Journal of Diabetes Research

Journal of Diabetes Research / 2011 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 |Article ID 623472 |

Eva Ludvigsen, Mats Stridsberg, Eva T. Janson, Stellan Sandler, "Altered Expression of Somatostatin Receptors in Pancreatic Islets from NOD Mice Cultured at Different Glucose Concentrations In Vitro and in Islets Transplanted to Diabetic NOD Mice In Vivo", Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2011, Article ID 623472, 8 pages, 2011.

Altered Expression of Somatostatin Receptors in Pancreatic Islets from NOD Mice Cultured at Different Glucose Concentrations In Vitro and in Islets Transplanted to Diabetic NOD Mice In Vivo

Academic Editor: Francesco Chiarelli
Received11 Apr 2011
Accepted02 Jul 2011
Published05 Sep 2011


Somatostatin acts via five receptors (sst1-5). We investigated if the changes in pancreatic islet sst expression in diabetic NOD mice compared to normoglycemic mice are a consequence of hyperglycemia or the ongoing immune reaction in the pancreas. Pancreatic islets were isolated from NOD mice precultured for 5 days and further cultured for 3 days at high or low glucose before examined. Islets were also isolated from NOD mice and transplanted to normal or diabetic mice in a number not sufficient to cure hyperglycemia. After three days, the transplants were removed and stained for sst1-5 and islet hormones. Overall, changes in sst islet cell expression were more common in islets cultured in high glucose concentration in vitro as compared to the islet transplantation in vivo to diabetic mice. The beta and PP cells exhibited more frequent changes in sst expression, while the alpha and delta cells were relatively unaffected by the high glucose condition. Our findings suggest that the glucose level may alter sst expressed in islets cells; however, immune mechanisms may counteract such changes in islet sst expression.

1. Introduction

Somatostatin is a peptide hormone, known to have several biological functions, and its effects are mediated via five specific membrane-bound receptors (sst1-5). In rodents, somatostatin inhibits secretion of several hormones such as insulin, glucagon, GH, TSH, and prolactin. It can also regulate gastrointestinal motility, gastric acid, and exocrine pancreatic secretion [15]. Immunohistochemical studies have shown that all five ssts are expressed on the pancreatic islets of rodents and that the intensity and distribution of ssts varies between the subtypes, the islet cell type, and species [68].

Type 1 diabetes mellitus is considered to be caused by autoimmune destruction of the pancreatic beta cells, rendering the pancreas unable to synthesize and secrete sufficient amounts of insulin. The nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse is an animal model with many features resembling human type 1 diabetes, such as infiltrating immune cells (insulitis) accompanied by spontaneous hyperglycaemia [9]. We have shown that diabetic NOD mice have a higher sst expression in the pancreatic islets as compared to normoglycemic NOD mice [1]. The mechanism behind this receptor upregulation in diabetic mice is not clear, but it may be either a consequence of hyperglycemia or due to immune reactions in the NOD mouse. To address this issue, we have performed both in vivo syngeneic islet transplantations to diabetic as well as normoglycemic NOD mice and cultured NOD mouse islets in vitro at different glucose concentrations and subsequently evaluated islet sst expression. The rationale for this design is that the in vitro system would provide an environment with only an elevated glucose concentration, whilst in vivo after islet transplantation both an influence from autoimmunity and a diabetic milieu can be envisaged.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals, Islet Isolation, and Culture

Inbred NOD mice (Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden), originally obtained from the Clea Company, Aobadi, Japan, were used for this study. The animals had free access to water and pelleted food and were housed in a room with a 12-hour light/dark cycle. All experiments were approved by the local animal ethics committee at Uppsala University (Uppsala, Sweden) and were in accordance with international guidelines (NIH publications 85–23). Blood glucose determinations (Medisense, Waltham, MA, USA) were performed on blood samples taken from the tail tip, and the weight of the animal was measured.

For islet isolation, male NOD mice (4–7 weeks of age) were killed by cervical dislocation followed by resection of the pancreas. Pancreatic islets were isolated by collagenase digestion procedure [10], and islets were hand picked with a braking pipette under stereomicroscope. Islets were precultured 5–7 days in 4.5 mL RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo, USA) containing 11.1 mM glucose, supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS, vol/vol), benzylpenicillin (100 U/mL), and streptomycin (0.1 mg/mL), in an atmosphere of humidified air +5% CO2 before experiments. Medium was changed every second day.

To investigate the effect of glucose on sst expression in vitro, groups of 100 pancreatic islets ( ) were cultured in RPMI 1640 + 10% FCS supplemented with 5.6 mM or 28.8 mM glucose for three days (e.g., [11]). The medium was changed on the second day.

2.2. Islet Transplantation beneath the Kidney Capsule

A female NOD mouse was considered diabetic when the nonfasting blood glucose concentration exceeded 10 mM and served as recipient of grafted islets to diabetic mice, whereas females with blood glucose below 10 mM were designated as normoglycemic. Normoglycemic ( ) and diabetic female ( ) NOD mice were anaesthetised with an intraperitoneal injection of 0.02 mL/g body weight of Avertin (a 2.5% solution of 10 g 97% 2,2,2-tribromoethanol (Sigma-Aldrich) in 10 mL 2-methyl-2-butanol (Kemila, Stockholm, Sweden)). Cultured pancreatic islets, 200 islets per graft, were collected in a braking pipette and implanted beneath the left kidney capsule. It should be noted that the number of implanted islets was on purpose chosen to be too low to normalize the hyperglycemia of the diabetic mice. The blood glucose levels were determined daily, and the animals were killed after three days, and the graft-bearing kidney was dissected free. The part of the kidney containing the islet graft was excised leaving a margin of 1 mm of each side of the graft.

2.3. Staining with sst1–5 Antibodies

The production and specificity of subtype-specific somatostatin receptor antibodies has been described earlier [7, 12]. The grafts or cultured islets were fixed in 10% buffered formalin (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) for 24 hours at room temperature and then changed to 70% ethanol and embedded in paraffin. Sections, 5 μm thick, were cut and attached to Polysine glass slides (Menzel-Gläser, Braunschweig, Germany).

The specimens were single stained for the five sst receptors [7]. The immune reaction was amplified by an avidin-biotin complex coupled to alkaline phosphates (Vectastain ABC-AP, Vector Laboratories Inc, Burlingame, Calif, USA) and visualized with Vector Red (Vector Laboratories), as substrate [7]. When the ssts-specific antibodies were preincubated with the peptides used for immunization, the immunoreactivity for each receptor was blocked (data not shown), [7]. Moreover, an extensive description of the generation, peptide specificity, and other characteristics of the sst antibodies is given in [7].

2.4. Coexpression of sst1–5 and Islet Cells

To investigate the coexpression of sst1-5 on the transplanted islet cells as well as the cultured islets, we used the immunofluorescence method described previously [7]. The transplants from normoglycemic female NOD mice and diabetic female NOD mice or islets cultured in different glucose concentrations were collected, paraffin embedded, and stained for sst1-5 in a cocktail with chicken anti-insulin (1 : 750, Immunsystem, Uppsala, Sweden), chicken antiglucagon (1 : 400, a kind gift from Professor Anders Larsson, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; raised against human glucagon (Novo Nordisk, Bagsvaerd, Denmark)), sheep antisomatostatin (1 : 25, Guildhay, Guildford, UK), or sheep anti-PP (1 : 25, SeroTech, Oxford, UK) as previously described [7]. The immune reaction was visualized by a cocktail consisting of secondary antibodies Cy3-conjugated donkey antirabbit IgG (1 : 100, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, Pa) and Cy2-conjugated donkey antisheep IgG (1 : 100, Jackson ImmunoResearch) or Cy2-conjugated donkey antichicken IgG (1 : 100, Jackson ImmunoResearch). The specificity of the commercially employed antihormone antibodies was tested by using different dilutions of the antibodies as well as omitting the primary antibodies. Concerning the generation, peptide specificities, and characterization of antibodies against the different sst-receptors, an in-depth description can be found in [7].

2.5. Morphological Evaluation

In the double fluorescence study, the kidney grafts or cultured islets were examined in a Leica Leitz DMR fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) equipped with filters of 492 nm to 510 nm for Cy2 (green) and 550 nm to 570 nm for Cy3 (red). Pictures from a Zeiss Axiocam camera (Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) of each transplants, using both filters, were merged together with Adobe Photoshop 7.0 software (Adobe, San Jose, Calif, USA), in which a yellow colour indicated coexpression of the sst subtype with any of the four islet hormones tested in this study. The results are expressed as a percentage of ssts-positive cells in relation to the total number of the respective islet cell type in a specific pancreatic islet.

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as means ± SEM, and groups of data were compared using Student’s -test, where P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The computer program used was SigmaStat 2.0 (SPSS Science, Chicago, Ill, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Animals

The blood glucose concentrations for the transplanted mice during three days are shown in Figure 1. The value on day 0 was obtained immediately before the operation and the day 3 value when the graft was removed. As can be seen in the figure, the implanted number of islets was not sufficient to cure the hyperglycemia, thus the mice remained diabetic, and the implanted islets were exposed to a diabetic state in vivo at least during the last two days. NOD mouse islets grafted into normoglycemic female NOD mice were used as control, and these mice remained normoglycemic throughout.

3.2. Coexpression of sst1–5 with Islets Hormones

To investigate the influence of elevated glucose concentrations on the islet sst expression pattern, grafts or cultured islets were double stained with sst1-5 antibodies together with the islet hormones insulin, glucagon, somatostatin, and PP.

In Figure 2, the quantitative analysis of the coexpression of sst1-5 with insulin, that is, beta cells in in vitro cultured islets (Figure 2(a)) or transplanted islets (Figure 2(b) is shown. The sst3 expression in beta-cells was significantly upregulated in islets cultured at 28.8 mM glucose, while the sst5 expression was significantly decreased as compared to islets cultured at 5.6 mM. No significant differences in expression were observed for sst1, sst2, and sst4. In the in vivo setting, the expression of all ssts remained unchanged except for sst1 which was significantly reduced in the islets removed from diabetic animals.

Figure 3 shows the distribution of insulin-positive cells (green, Figures 3(a)–3(e)) and the merged picture of cells coexpressing sst1-5 (yellow, Figures 3(f)–3(j)) in a representative section of a transplanted pancreatic islet from a diabetic NOD mouse. Sections of transplanted NOD mouse islets under the kidney capsule single stained for sst1-5 are shown in Figures 3(k)–3(o). The grafts were harvested already on day 3 with the intent that the process of so-called recurrence of disease with immune cell infiltration should be minimal [12, 13]. The kidney tissue was also weakly stained by the ssts antibodies suggesting that renal tissue also expresses sst.

There was no significant difference in sst1–sst4 expression on alpha cells between islets cultured at 5.6 mM and 28.8 mM glucose, while sst5 was significantly decreased when islets were cultured at high glucose levels (Figure 4(a)). All ssts remained unchanged on alpha cells from transplanted islets (Figure 4(b)).

Overall, the sst expression on delta cells in cultured islets was fairly low (Figure 5(a)). However, the sst5 expression was significantly increased at the high glucose concentration. The overall sst expression on delta cells in transplanted islets was higher, but equal when comparing transplants from normoglycemic and diabetic animals (Figure 5(b)).

On PP cells in islets cultured at 28.8 mM glucose, an increase of sst1 and a decrease in sst3 expression was observed (Figure 6(a)), while the expression of the other sst remained unchanged. In transplanted islets, PP cells showed a decrease in sst2 and an increase in sst4 expression, while the other ssts remained unchanged (Figure 6(b)).

4. Discussion

We have previously shown that all sst subtypes are expressed in rodent pancreatic islets, but on the expression varies between the four major islet cell types [7]. Furthermore, this sst expression was increased in diabetic compared to normoglycemic NOD mice, particularly for sst2–sst5 [1]. The reason for this latter finding was not clear and the aim of the present study was to investigate if the increased ssts expression observed in pancreatic islets of diabetic NOD mice depends on an elevated glucose concentration in vivo or merely reflects a response to the ongoing immune reaction in the pancreas of the NOD mice.

NOD mouse pancreatic islets were cultured in vitro for three days in media containing either 5.6 mM glucose or 28.8 mM glucose to elucidate the effect of an elevated glucose concentration without a putative influence of immune-related factors present in vivo, for example, cytokines. In parallel precultured islets isolated from young normoglycemic NOD mice were transplanted under the kidney capsule of diabetic NOD mice. A suboptimal number of islets were implanted, which means that the diabetic animals remained hyperglycaemic, and the grafted islets were exposed to a prolonged period of high glucose in vivo. The grafts were removed after three days, before any marked signs of graft destruction by invading immune cells following so-called recurrence of disease [13, 14]. If a later time point after transplantation had been selected, it is anticipated that the evolving graft destruction and further increasing blood glucose concentrations would become confounding factors when evaluating the current data.

The changes in sst expression observed after either culture at high glucose or after islet transplantation to diabetic recipients are schematically summarized in Table 1. More alterations in islet cell expression of ssts were induced in the in vitro setting compared to those observed in vivo following islet transplantation. It cannot be excluded that the in vitro environment allows more glucose-induced changes in sst expression to become manifest than in vivo, since compensatory extraislet mechanisms conveyed by nerves and blood flow may counteract such changes. In addition, the ambient experimental glucose concentration (28.8 mM) in vitro was higher in comparison to the glucose concentration of the transplanted diabetic mice (15–20 mM). It is possible that this difference in islet exposure to glucose had an impact on changes in islet cell sst expression. Moreover, the changes observed in vitro did not correspond to changes obtained in vivo, which could argue in favour of the assumption that the level of glucose is of importance.

Cultured isletsTransplanted islets
28 mM glucose versus 5.6 mM glucoseDiabetic versus normoglycemic

Cell PP PP

denotes no significant change, denotes a decline in the fraction of cells expressing the sst, and denotes an increase in the fraction of cells expressing the sst.

The combined analysis of the in vivo and in vitro data suggests that the alpha and delta cells were relatively unaffected by the high-glucose conditions, whilst beta and PP cells exhibited more dynamic changes. Concerning the specific sst, it was found that in vitro exposure to high glucose affected sst5 expression on alpha, beta, and delta cells. Sst5 activation is suggested to inhibit the insulin secretion in rodents [8, 1517]. Higher insulin levels are needed to meet the demand of an elevated glucose concentration. It may therefore be suggested that the decrease in sst5 expression seen in this study is a downregulation of receptor expression to avoid signalling which may inhibit the insulin secretion from beta cells. Interestingly a similar decrease in beta cell sst5 expression was found in the spontaneously diabetic NOD mice [1]. The effect of the increased sst5 expression on delta cells is unclear, but it might contribute to an autocrine-mediated dampered secretion of somatostatin which would promote insulin secretion.

The expression of sst3 was increased on beta cells in isolated islets cultured at higher glucose concentrations. The insulin-producing cell line MIN6 has previously been reported to express sst3, and this was suggested to be related to MAP kinase and c-fos signalling in inhibition of cell growth by somatostatin [18]. An upregulation of sst3 by a high glucose concentration could result in a restriction on beta-cell proliferation promoted in a milieu of a high-functional demand on the beta cells. Moreover, sst3 may also affect signal transduction associated with adenyl cyclase activity [2], which could be of relevance for beta-cell function since cAMP is an important amplifier of insulin secretion [19].

PP secretion is inhibited by somatostatin and by elevated blood glucose levels [20]. At higher concentrations of glucose in vitro, the sst1 expression was increased and sst3 expression decreased on PP cells. It is possible that these combined changes in expression of sst is part of the regulation of the PP-cell response to high glucose. Further studies, however, are needed to address this question.

5. Conclusion

In our earlier study in NOD mice, we reported a higher sst expression in the pancreatic islets of diabetic mice as compared to normoglycemic NOD mice [1]. The mechanism behind this upregulation in diabetic mice was unclear, but it may be either a consequence of hyperglycemia or due to immune reactions in the NOD mouse. Our data from this study indicates that hyperglycemia alone is not enough to explain the changes observed in NOD mice in vivo. Either immune-related mechanisms or other in vivo regulatory mechanisms may counteract effects of elevated glucose on islet cell sst expression. Future studies should address the mechanisms of the immune response for the changes in sst expression in pancreatic islets observed in NOD mice with a spontaneously developed diabetes.


The technical expertise of Ing-Britt Hallgren and Astrid Nordin is gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by Grants from the Swedish Research Council (no. 72X-8273), the Swedish Diabetes Association, the Swedish Cancer Foundation, the Novo Nordisk Fund, the Family Ernfors Fund, the Wallenberg Fund, and the Lions Foundations for Cancer Research at the University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.


  1. E. Ludvigsen, M. Stridsberg, E. T. Janson, and S. Sandler, “Expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes 1-5 in pancreatic islets of normoglycaemic and diabetic NOD mice,” European Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 445–454, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. L. N. Møller, C. E. Stidsen, B. Hartmann, and J. J. Holst, “Somatostatin receptors,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1616, no. 1, pp. 1–84, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. Y. C. Patel, “Somatostatin and its receptor family,” Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 157–198, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. I. Shimon, J. E. Taylor, J. Z. Dong et al., “Somatostatin receptor subtype specificity in human fetal pituitary cultures. Differential role of SSTR2 and SSTR5 for growth hormone, thyroid- stimulating hormone, and prolactin regulation,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 789–798, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  5. M. C. Zatelli, D. Piccin, F. Tagliati et al., “Somatostatin receptor subtype 1 selective activation in human growth hormone (GH)- and prolactin (PRL)-secreting pituitary adenomas: effects on cell viability, GH, and PRL secretion,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2797–2802, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  6. B. Hunyady, R. W. Hipkin, A. Schonbrunn, and A. Mezey, “Immunohistochemical localization of somatostatin receptor SST2A in the rat pancreas,” Endocrinology, vol. 138, no. 6, pp. 2632–2635, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. E. Ludvigsen, R. Olsson, M. Stridsberg, E. T. Janson, and S. Sandler, “Expression and distribution of somatostatin receptor subtypes in the pancreatic islets of mice and rats,” Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 391–400, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  8. S. W. Mitra, E. Mezey, B. Hunyady et al., “Colocalization of somatostatin receptor sst5 and insulin in rat pancreatic β-cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 3790–3796, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  9. M. A. Atkinson and E. H. Leiter, “The NOD mouse model of type 1 diabetes: as good as it gets?” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 601–604, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. S. Sandler, A. Andersson, and C. Hellerstrom, “Inhibitory effects of interleukin 1 on insulin secretion, insulin biosynthesis, and oxidative metabolism of isolated rat pancreatic islets,” Endocrinology, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 1424–1431, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  11. S. Sandler, K. Bendtzen, D. L. Eizirik, E. Strandell, M. Welsh, and N. Welsh, “Metabolism and β-cell function of rat pancreatic islets exposed to human interleukin-1β in the presence of a high glucose concentration,” Immunology Letters, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 245–251, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. G. M. Portela-Gomes, M. Stridsberg, L. Grimelius, K. Öberg, and E. T. Janson, “Expression of the five different somatostatin receptor subtypes in endocrine cells of the pancreas,” Applied Immunohistochemistry and Molecular Morphology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 126–132, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. I. N. Nomikos, S. J. Prowse, P. Carotenuto, and K. J. Lafferty, “Combined treatment with nicotinamide and desferrioxamine prevents islet allograft destruction in NOD mice,” Diabetes, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 1302–1304, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. E. Panerai, F. Nicoletti, P. Sacedote et al., “MFP14, a multifunctional emerging protein with immunomodulatory properties, prevents spontaneous and recurrent autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice,” Diabetologia, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 839–847, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. Ludvigsen, M. Stridsberg, J. E. Taylor et al., “Regulation of insulin and glucagon secretion from rat pancreatic islets in vitro by somatostatin analogues,” Regulatory Peptides, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. Z. Strowski, R. M. Parmar, A. D. Blake, and J. M. Schaeffer, “Somatostatin inhibits insulin and glucagon secretion via two receptor subtypes: an in vitro study of pancreatic islets from somatostatin receptor 2 knockout mice,” Endocrinology, vol. 141, no. 1, pp. 111–117, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Z. Strowski, M. Kohler, H. Y. Chen et al., “Somatostatin receptor subtype 5 regulates insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 93–106, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. H. Yoshitomi, Y. Fujii, M. Miyazaki, N. Nakajima, N. Inagaki, and S. Seino, “Involvement of MAP kinase and c-fos signaling in the inhibition of cell growth by somatostatin,” American Journal of Physiology, vol. 272, no. 5, pp. E769–E774, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  19. B. Furman, N. Pyne, P. Flatt, and F. O'Harte, “Targeting β-cell cyclic 3′5′ adenosine monophosphate for the development of novel drugs for treating type 2 diabetes mellitus. A rewiew,” Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 1477–1492, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. T. E. Adrian, S. R. Bloom, and M. G. Bryant, “Distribution and release of human pancreatic polypeptide,” Gut, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 940–944, 1976. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2011 Eva Ludvigsen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.