Animal Models of Diabetes and Metabolic DiseaseView this Special Issue
Foxp3+ Regulatory T Cells in Mouse Models of Type 1 Diabetes
Studies on human type 1 diabetes (T1D) are facilitated by the availability of animal models such as nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice that spontaneously develop autoimmune diabetes, as well as a variety of genetically engineered mouse models with reduced genetic and pathogenic complexity, as compared to the spontaneous NOD model. In recent years, increasing evidence has implicated CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (Treg) cells expressing the transcription factor Foxp3 in both the breakdown of self-tolerance and the restoration of immune homeostasis in T1D. In this paper, we provide an overview of currently available mouse models to study the role of Foxp3+ Treg cells in the control of destructive cell autoimmunity, including a novel NOD model that allows specific and temporally controlled deletion of Foxp3+ Treg cells.
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is a chronic disease manifested by the loss of functional insulin producing cells of pancreatic islets, caused by islet infiltrating self-reactive CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that mediate -cell destruction . Many of the immunological aspects of human T1D are mimicked by the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse model, which shows islet infiltration and destructive autoimmune insulitis as early as four weeks of age and spontaneously progresses to overt diabetes in the adult . Observations in mice and humans have demonstrated that CD4+CD25+ regulatory T (Treg) cells expressing the forkhead box transcription factor Foxp3 play an indispensable role in the maintenance of immune homeostasis by regulating inflammatory responses against invading pathogens and preventing destructive autoimmunity [3–6]. A particularly striking example of Foxp3+ Treg cell function that restrains destructive tissue-specific autoimmune responses is the observation that acute ablation of Treg cells in adult NOD mice carrying a pancreatic cell-reactive T cell receptor (TCR) as a transgene unleashes overt autoimmune diabetes within days (see Section 4.3). Given their nonredundant function in maintaining immune homeostasis, it is not surprising that Foxp3+ Treg cells have attracted considerable attention as particularly promising gain-of-function targets in clinical settings of unwanted immune responses, such as T1D. Here, we provide an overview of mouse models for T1D that, in our view, appear particularly suitable to study various aspects of Foxp3+ Treg cell-mediated control of cell autoimmunity, ranging from classical diabetes models adapted to the functional analysis of Treg cells to novel genetic tools for Treg cell depletion in NOD mice.
2. Pancreatic Cell Expression of Neo-Self-Antigens
2.1. Spontaneous Models
Double-transgenic mice that coexpress model antigens (such as ovalbumin, LCMV glycoprotein, or influenza hemagglutinin; HA) in pancreatic cells together with TCRs reactive to the respective cell neo-self-antigen (either MHC class I- or class II-restricted) spontaneously develop autoimmune diabetes, recapitulating some aspects of the spontaneous NOD model, albeit with faster kinetics . As an example, transgenic expression of an HA-reactive TCR on CD4+ [9, 10] or CD8+  T cells promotes spontaneous diabetes development in mice that additionally express HA under control of the rat insulin promoter (RIP-HA) . Potential limitations of the RIP-HA model, many of which are shared between the various double-transgenic diabetes models, have been discussed in detail elsewhere . Nevertheless, TCR-HA × RIP-HA mice offer some advantages that appear particularly relevant in the context of mechanistic studies on antigen-specific tolerance induction. While limiting cell pathogenicity to a single, well-defined neo-self-protein, and in contrast to many other transgenic TCRs (e.g., DO11.10), the TCR-HA is expressed only on a fraction of CD4+ T cells (ranging from 5% to 20% in different lymphoid tissues) that coexist with polyclonal populations of TCR-HA− CD4+ T cells expressing endogenous TCR gene rearrangements . In the TCR-HA × RIP-HA model, selective delivery of agonist ligand to steady-state DEC-205+ DCs has been shown to interfere with the development of autoimmune diabetes , probably due to the extrathymic induction of antigen-specific Foxp3+ Treg cells from initially naïve Foxp3−TCR-HA+ T cells [16, 17]. However, it appears desirable that findings observed in double-transgenic models of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes will subsequently be extended to the nontransgenic NOD model.
2.2. Adoptive Transfer Models
In immunodeficient (Rag−/−, nude) RIP-HA recipient mice, adoptive transfer of naïve CD4+TCR-HA+ T cells (i.e., without prior T cell activation in vitro) from TCR-HA donor mice induces autoimmune diabetes within 1-2 weeks [10, 14, 18]. In immunocompetent recipient mice, naïve CD4+TCR-HA+ T cell transfer (Figure 1(a)) fails to induce overt diabetes (Figure 1(c)), perhaps due to extrathymic induction of a Foxp3+ Treg cell phenotype in a significant proportion of initially Foxp3− T cells, upon recognition of the cognate antigen on antigen-presenting cells residing in peripheral lymphoid tissues (Figure 1(b)). Notably, initially naïve CD8+CL4+  and CD4+TCR-HA+ (Figure 1(c)) T cells, which had been preactivated in vitro as previously described , can promote autoimmune diabetes development shortly after injection into immunocompetent recipient mice. It is important to emphasize that kinetics and efficiency of diabetes induction critically depend on suitable culture conditions for preactivation.
Double-transgenic TCR-HA × Pgk-HA mice represent a convenient source of antigen-specific Foxp3+ Treg cells, as expression of HA under control of the phosphoglycerate kinase promoter (Pgk-HA) results in peripheral accumulation of intrathymically induced Foxp3+TCR-HA+ Treg cells . Foxp3−TCR-HA+ T regulatory 1 cells with potent suppressor capacity can be readily isolated from peripheral lymphoid tissues of TCR-HA mice that coexpress HA under the control of the Ig-κ promoter . Overall, the RIP-HA model offers unique opportunities to study mechanisms of antigen-specific suppression of cell autoimmunity, employing cotransfer of TCR-HA+ Treg cells, either with a Foxp3+ or Foxp3− phenotype, together with pathogenic T effector cells (CD4+TCR-HA+ or CD8+CL4+).
3. NOD Adoptive Transfer Models
3.1. Adoptive BDC2.5 T Cell Transfer
CD4+ T cells expressing the BDC2.5 TCR as a transgene, which is reactive to islet cells in the context of MHC class II Ag7 molecules, are highly diabetogenic in NOD mice [24, 25]. While agonistic mimotope peptides that stimulate BDC2.5+ T cells at nanomolar concentrations had been described some years ago , chromogranin A has only recently been proposed to represent the natural self-antigen responsible for pancreatic cell pathogenicity of BDC2.5+ T cells . Naïve BDC2.5+ T cells, FACS purified (Figure 2(a)) from peripheral lymphoid tissues of immunocompetent NOD.BDC2.5 mice with Foxp3-dependent GFP expression (see Section 4.3) and adoptively transferred into either TCR-−/−  or Rag1−/− (Figure 2(b)) NOD mice, undergo lymphopenia-driven proliferation, resulting in the acquisition of a Foxp3+ Treg cell phenotype in a significant proportion of initially Foxp3− T cells [29–31]. Nevertheless, without prior T cell activation in vitro, adoptive transfer of 5 × 105 naïve BDC2.5+ T cells consistently induces autoimmune diabetes in lymphopenic NOD mice within days, as revealed by high blood glucose concentrations (Figure 2(c)). In this adoptive transfer model, autoimmune diabetes onset can be further accelerated by TCR prestimulation in vitro and injection of increasing numbers of BDC2.5+ T cells (Figure 2(c)). In fact, adoptive transfer of in vitro activated BDC2.5+ T cells into neonatal or immunodeficient (scid, TCR-−/−, Rag1−/−) NOD recipient mice is commonly used as a standard protocol for the induction of autoimmune-mediated pancreatic islet inflammation. In contrast to T helper (Th) 2  and Th17  cells that had been generated from BDC2.5+ T cells in vitro, Th1-polarized BDC2.5+ T cells efficiently induce aggressive autoimmune diabetes upon injection into neonatal NOD mice , whereas Th17 BDC2.5+ cells have been reported to promote rapid onset of diabetes in adult NOD.scid mice .
In addition to providing diabetogenic CD4+BDC2.5+ T effector cells, NOD.BDC2.5 mice with Foxp3-dependent GFP expression [28, 34–37] represent a convenient source of Foxp3+ Treg cells with the same antigen specificity, which can be readily FACS purified (V4+CD4+CD25+GFP+) from CD25 bead enriched single cell suspensions of peripheral lymphoid donor tissues (Figure 3(a)). Importantly, cotransfer of as few as 5 × 104 Foxp3+BDC2.5+ Treg cells is sufficient to mediate long-term autoimmune protection of NOD.Rag1−/− mice that additionally received 5 × 105 diabetogenic naïve BDC2.5+ T cells (Figure 3(b)). Besides studies on the suppressor function of Foxp3+BDC2.5+ Treg cell populations naturally developing in NOD.BDC2.5 mice, the adoptive BDC2.5+ T cell transfer model provides the opportunity to assess the suppressive capacity of Foxp3+ Treg cells that had been artificially generated from initially Foxp3−BDC2.5+ T cells in experimental settings of extrathymic Treg cell induction, for example, by retrovirus-mediated ectopic expression of Foxp3 (Figure 3(c)). Note that, as compared to the adoptive transfer of naïve BDC2.5+ T cells alone (Figure 3(b)), cotransfer of [Empty]-IRES-YFP+ BDC2.5+ T cells substantially accelerates diabetes due to T cell prestimulation in vitro for retrovirus infection (Figure 3(c)).
In immunocompetent NOD mice, the in vivo application of in vitro expanded Foxp3+BDC2.5+ Treg cells [38, 39], as well as Foxp3+BDC2.5+ Treg cells, generated in vitro either by ectopic expression of Foxp3  or TGF--mediated induction of Foxp3 expression , can be effective in prevention or even reversal of spontaneously developing diabetes.
3.2. Adoptive Transfer of Polyclonal T Cells
Unfractionated splenocytes from diabetic, non-TCR transgenic NOD donor mice can induce autoimmune diabetes within 3 weeks after injection into immunodeficient NOD mice, such as NOD.Rag1−/− mice (Figure 3(d)) or irradiated NOD mice . Although the relative contribution of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells had remained controversial in previous studies [42, 43], more recent observations in NOD.scid mice using highly purified T cell populations revealed that the development of autoimmune diabetes in this adoptive transfer model requires both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells . Cotransfer of polyclonal Foxp3+ Treg cells, either purified populations or contained in unfractionated total cell populations, can be employed to assess their suppressive capacity in the context of autoimmune diabetes. After tolerogenic DEC-205+ dendritic cell vaccination to promote proinsulin-reactive Foxp3+ Treg cell activity, cotransfer of total spleen cells from autoimmune protected NOD donors can delay the onset of diabetogenic splenocyte-mediated diabetes in NOD.Rag1−/− recipients (Figure 3(d)) .
4. Abrogation of Foxp3+ Treg Cell Activity
4.1. Genetic Deficiency
Abrogated Treg cell function has been actively debated as a putative mechanism underlying various autoimmune disorders in humans . The important role of Foxp3+ Treg cells in protection from autoimmune diabetes is highlighted by the notion that T1D represents a major component of the IPEX (immune dysfunction, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X-linked) syndrome [46–48] that affects humans with abrogated Treg cell function due to mutations in the FOXP3 gene [49–51]. In mice, spontaneous  or gene-targeted  Foxp3 deficiency leads to death by 3-4 weeks of age due to the development of a fatal multiorgan autoimmune syndrome that recapitulates many clinical features of the human IPEX syndrome. Notably, the manifestation of autoimmune diabetes in Foxp3-deficient mice on non-autoimmune-prone genetic backgrounds has not been reported thus far. Moreover, Foxp3-deficient mice on the diabetes-prone NOD background develop exocrine pancreatitis and peri-insulitis, but do not manifest invasive insulitis and diabetes . Several nonmutually exclusive mechanisms may account for the absence of overt diabetes in Foxp3-deficient mice, which includes premature death and altered T cell repertoire selection due to severe defects in thymic T cell development . In any case, this striking difference to human IPEX patients regarding the manifestation of autoimmune diabetes limits the exploitation of mice with constitutive genetic Foxp3 deficiency and concomitant absence of functional Treg cells in studies on pancreatic cell autoimmunity.
4.2. Administration of Anti-CD25 mAbs
To examine the contribution of Foxp3+ Treg cells in the control of pancreatic cell autoimmunity, administration of anti-CD25 mAbs has been widely used as a loss-of-function approach, with the overwhelming majority of studies employing the clone PC61 (rather than 7D4). Whether abrogation of suppressor activity upon in vivo administration of anti-CD25 mAbs can be attributed to the functional inactivation  or the actual physical elimination (deletion) of CD25-expressing Foxp3+ Treg cells has been controversially discussed [56–58]. In otherwise nonmanipulated NOD mice, single dose  or repeated  injection of the anti-CD25 mAb PC61 can significantly accelerate the spontaneous development of autoimmune diabetes in adolescent but not adult  females. In experimental settings of tolerogenic regimens that result in long-term protection of NOD mice from autoimmune cell destruction, anti-CD25 mAbs have been employed as an approach to address the relative contribution of CD25+ Treg cells in tolerance induction, with PC61 administration resulting either in the rapid precipitation of overt diabetes [59, 61–63] or the failure to break established cell tolerance and maintenance of normoglycemia [64–66]. However, interpretation of results from such experiments is hampered by the fact that CD25 expression is not exclusive to Foxp3+ Treg cells. In fact, PC61 administration to adult NOD mice has also been reported to delay diabetes onset , perhaps due to its negative impact on activated CD4+ and CD8+ T effector cells with upregulated CD25 expression. Additionally, it appears important to emphasize that anti-CD25 treatment with the aim to interfere with Treg cell function, either by deletion or functional inactivation, will inevitably spare Foxp3+ Treg cells with a CD25low/− phenotype. Consistently, anti-CD25 treatment protocols preserve significant numbers of Foxp3+ cells [56–58, 67, 68].
4.3. Diphtheria Toxin-Mediated Deletion of Foxp3+ Treg Cells
Foxp3-dependent expression of the human diphtheria toxin (DT) receptor as a transgene, either from an internal ribosome entry site (IRES) downstream of the Foxp3coding region  or from a Foxp3 bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) (termed “depletion of regulatory T cell” mice, DEREG; ), provides an opportunity for specific and temporally controlled deletion of Foxp3+ Treg cells in mice on non-autoimmune-prone genetic backgrounds. In both mouse models, Foxp3+ Treg cell depletion by the in vivo administration of DT promotes the development of autoimmune disorders, albeit with differences in the severity of autoimmune symptoms [36, 69]. On the NOD genetic background, two independent mouse lines with DT receptor expression selectively in Foxp3+ Treg cells have been generated. While Feuerer et al. established a novel Foxp3 BAC transgenic line employing NOD embryos , we generated NOD.Foxp mice by backcrossing the transgene of the well-characterized DEREG mouse model [36, 70–73] onto the NOD/Lt background (Figure 4).
Transgenic expression of the BDC2.5 TCR efficiently prevents the development of spontaneous autoimmune diabetes in immunocompetent NOD females  but dramatically accelerates diabetes progression in immunodeficient NOD mice, such as NOD.TCR-−/− or NOD.Rag1−/− mice , as well as in NOD.Foxp3−/− mice . Acute ablation of Foxp3+ Treg cells (Figure 4(a)) can lead to transiently increased blood glucose concentration in some adult NOD.Foxp females, but fails to consistently promote overt diabetes (Figure 4(b)). In NOD.Foxp × BDC2.5 females, Foxp3+ Treg cell ablation triggers autoimmune cell destruction within 8 days after initiation of DT administration (Figure 4(b)). Notably, and in contrast to the spontaneous NOD model, the NOD.Foxp × BDC2.5 model additionally allows the induction of autoimmune diabetes in male mice, with similar efficiency and kinetics as compared to females (Figure 4(c)).
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
This work was supported by the Kompetenznetz Diabetes mellitus (Competence Network for Diabetes mellitus) funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ 01GI0805-07) by a grant from the BMBF to the German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD e.V., FKZ01GI0924) and by the FZT 111 (DFG, Center for Regenerative Therapies Dresden, Cluster of Excellence).
G. Kassiotis, A. Liston, and S. Sakaguchi, “Regulatory T cells: history and perspective,” in Regulatory T Cells, pp. 3–17, Humana Press, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
D. J. Morgan, R. Liblau, B. Scott et al., “CD8+ T cell-mediated spontaneous diabetes in noenatal mice,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 157, no. 3, pp. 978–983, 1996.View at: Google Scholar
D. Lo, J. Freedman, S. Hesse, R. D. Palmiter, R. L. Brinster, and L. A. Sherman, “Peripheral tolerance to an islet cell-specific hemagglutinin transgene affects both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 1013–1022, 1992.View at: Google Scholar
A. Sarukhan, O. Lechner, and H. von Boehmer, “Autoimmune insulitis and diabetes in the absence of antigen-specific contact between T cells and β-islet cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 3410–3416, 1999.View at: Google Scholar
C. Vizler, N. Bercovici, A. Heurtier et al., “Relative diabetogenic properties of islet-specific Tc1 and Tc2 cells in immunocompetent hosts,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 165, no. 11, pp. 6314–6321, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
C. Petzold, J. Riewaldt, T. Koenig, S. Schallenberg, and K. Kretschmer, “Dendritic cell-targeted pancreatic beta-cell antigen leads to conversion of self-reactive CD4+ T cells into regulatory T cells and promotes immunotolerance in NOD mice,” The Review of Diabetic Studies, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 47–61, 2010.View at: Google Scholar
W. Hansen, A. M. Westendorf, S. Reinwald et al., “Chronic antigen stimulation in vivo induces a distinct population of antigen-specific Foxp3-CD25- regulatory T cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 179, no. 12, pp. 8059–8068, 2007.View at: Google Scholar
K. Haskins, M. Portas, B. Bradley, D. Wegmann, and K. Lafferty, “T-lymphocyte clone specific for pancreatic islet antigen,” Diabetes, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1444–1448, 1988.View at: Google Scholar
V. Judkowski, C. Pinilla, K. Schroder, L. Tucker, N. Sarvetnick, and D. B. Wilson, “Identification of MHC class II-restricted peptide ligands, including a glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 sequence, that stimulate diabetogenic T cells from transgenic BDC2.5 nonobese diabetic mice,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 166, no. 2, pp. 908–917, 2001.View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Curotto De Lafaille, A. C. Lino, N. Kutchukhidze, and J. J. Lafaille, “CD25- T cells generate CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells by peripheral expansion,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 12, pp. 7259–7268, 2004.View at: Google Scholar
B. Knoechel, J. Lohr, E. Kahn, J. A. Bluestone, and A. K. Abbas, “Sequential development of interleukin 2-dependent effector and regulatory T cells in response to endogenous systemic antigen,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 202, no. 10, pp. 1375–1386, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Katz, C. Benoist, and D. Mathis, “T helper cell subsets in insulin-dependent diabetes,” Science, vol. 268, no. 5214, pp. 1185–1188, 1995.View at: Google Scholar
N. Martin-Orozco, Y. Chung, S. H. Chang, Y. H. Wang, and C. Dong, “Th17 cells promote pancreatic inflammation but only induce diabetes efficiently in lymphopenic hosts after conversion into Th1 cells,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 216–224, 2009.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. L. Bettini, F. Pan, M. Bettini et al., “Loss of epigenetic modification driven by the Foxp3 transcription factor leads to regulatory T cell insufficiency,” Immunity, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 717–730, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
J. Darce, D. Rudra, L. Li et al., “An N-terminal mutation of the Foxp3 transcription factor alleviates arthritis but exacerbates diabetes,” Immunity, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 731–741, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
K. V. Tarbell, S. Yamazaki, K. Olson, P. Toy, and R. M. Steinman, “CD25+ CD4+ T cells, expanded with dendritic cells presenting a single autoantigenic peptide, suppress autoimmune diabetes,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 199, no. 11, pp. 1467–1477, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Luo, K. V. Tarbell, H. Yang et al., “Dendritic cells with TGF-β1 differentiate naive CD4+CD25- T cells into islet-protective Foxp3+ regulatory T cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 8, pp. 2821–2826, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. J. Miller, M. C. Appel, J. J. O'Neil, and L. S. Wicker, “Both the Lyt-2+ and L3T4+ T cell subsets are required for the transfer of diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 140, no. 1, pp. 52–58, 1988.View at: Google Scholar
S. W. Christianson, L. D. Shultz, and E. H. Leiter, “Adoptive transfer of diabetes into immunodeficient NOD-scid/scid mice: relative contributions of CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells from diabetic versus prediabetic NOD.NON-Thy-1a donors,” Diabetes, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 44–55, 1993.View at: Google Scholar
M. Miyara, G. Gorochov, M. Ehrenstein et al., “Human Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in systemic autoimmune diseases,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 744–755, 2011.View at: Google Scholar
R. S. Wildin, S. Smyk-Pearson, and A. H. Filipovich, “Clinical and molecular features of the immunodysregulation, polyendocrinopathy, enteropathy, X linked (IPEX) syndrome,” Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 537–545, 2002.View at: Google Scholar
T. A. Chatila, F. Blaeser, N. Ho et al., “JM2, encoding a fork head-related protein, is mutated in X-linked autoimmunity-allergic disregulation syndrome,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 106, no. 12, pp. R75–R81, 2000.View at: Google Scholar
A. P. Kohm, J. S. McMahon, J. R. Podojil et al., “Cutting edge: anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody injection results in the functional inactivation, not depletion, of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 6, pp. 3301–3305, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
L. A. Stephens and S. M. Anderton, “Comment on ‘Cutting edge: anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody injection results in the functional inactivation, not depletion, of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells’,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 4, article 2036, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
S. Zelenay and J. Demengeot, “Comment on ‘Cutting edge: anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody injection results in the functional inactivation, not depletion, of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells’,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 4, pp. 2036–2037, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
K. Fukushima, N. Abiru, Y. Nagayama et al., “Combined insulin B:9-23 self-peptide and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid accelerate insulitis but inhibit development of diabetes by increasing the proportion of CD4+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells in the islets in non-obese diabetic mice,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 367, no. 4, pp. 719–724, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Ly, Q. S. Mi, S. Hussain, and T. L. Delovitch, “Protection from type 1 diabetes by invariant NK T cells requires the activity of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 6, pp. 3695–3704, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
F. Billiard, C. Lobry, G. Darrasse-Jeze et al., “Dll4-Notch signaling in Flt3-independent dendritic cell development and autoimmunity in mice,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 209, no. 5, pp. 1011–1028, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
X. Luo, K. L. Pothoven, D. McCarthy et al., “ECDI-fixed allogeneic splenocytes induce donor-specific tolerance for long-term survival of islet transplants via two distinct mechanisms,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 105, no. 38, pp. 14527–14532, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. P. Huebner, Y. Shi, M. N. Torrero et al., “Helminth protection against autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice is independent of a type 2 immune shift and requires TGF-β,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 2, pp. 559–568, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
K. Minamimura, W. Gao, and T. Maki, “CD4+ regulatory T cells are spared from deletion by antilymphocyte serum, a polyclonal anti-T cell antibody,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 176, no. 7, pp. 4125–4132, 2006.View at: Google Scholar
S. Schallenberg, C. Petzold, P.-Y. Tsai, T. Sparwasser, and K. Kretschmer, “Vagaries of fluorochrome reporter gene expression in Foxp3+ regulatory T cells,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 8, Article ID e41971.View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Baru, C. Untucht, V. Ganesh et al., “Optimal isolation of functional Foxp3+ induced regulatory T cells using DEREG mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, Article ID e44760, 2012.View at: Google Scholar
S. You, G. Slehoffer, S. Barriot, J. F. Bach, and L. Chatenoud, “Unique role of CD4+CD62L+ regulatory T cells in the control of autoimmune diabetes in T cell receptor transgenic mice,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, supplement 2, pp. 14580–14585, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar