Research Article

The Effect of Diabetes Self-Management Education on Body Weight, Glycemic Control, and Other Metabolic Markers in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Table 2

Comparison of ultrasound parameters of the carotid artery and metabolic markers between the baseline and follow-up assessments in the intervention and control groups.

Intervention ( )Control ( )
#BaselineFollow up value #BaselineFollow up value

Age, years
Gender, female/male, 22/1428/12
Duration of diabetes, years
IMT, m 0.025* 0.579
DC, 1/KPa 0.821 0.529
CC, mm2/KPa 0.660 0.525
0.122 0.124
0.099 0.677
PWV, m/s 0.177 0.584
Blood glucose, mmol/L 0.238 0.427
Total cholesterol, mmol/L 0.034* <0.001*
HDL, mmol/L 0.160 0.303
LDL, mmol/L 0.005* <0.001*
Triglyceride, mmol/L 0.626 0.850
HbA1c, % 0.039* 0.102
Weight, kg <0.001* 0.066
BMI, kg/m2 <0.001* 0.019*
SBP, mmHg 0.692 0.498
DBP, mmHg 0.916 0.221

No significant difference ( ) was found in age, gender, duration of type 2 diabetes, metabolic markers, CIMT, and CAS between the intervention and control groups in the baseline assessment.
value indicates significant difference between baseline and follow-up examination in either intervention group or control group. IMT: intima-media thickness; DC: distensibility coefficient; CC: compliance coefficient; PWV: pulse wave velocity; HDL: high density lipoprotein; LDL: low density lipoprotein; HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c; BMI: body mass index; SBP: systolic blood pressure; and DBP: diastolic blood pressure.