Journal of Diabetes Research

Journal of Diabetes Research / 2015 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2015 |Article ID 341583 |

Alicia A. Thorp, Markus P. Schlaich, "Relevance of Sympathetic Nervous System Activation in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome", Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2015, Article ID 341583, 11 pages, 2015.

Relevance of Sympathetic Nervous System Activation in Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome

Academic Editor: Janet H. Southerland
Received15 Dec 2014
Accepted30 Mar 2015
Published30 Apr 2015


Sympathetic tone is well recognised as being implicit in cardiovascular control. It is less readily acknowledged that activation of the sympathetic nervous system is integral in energy homeostasis and can exert profound metabolic effects. Accumulating data from animal and human studies suggest that central sympathetic overactivity plays a pivotal role in the aetiology and complications of several metabolic conditions that can cluster to form the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS). Given the known augmented risk for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality associated with the MetS understanding the complex pathways underlying the metabolic derangements involved has become a priority. Many factors have been proposed to contribute to increased sympathetic nerve activity in metabolic abnormalities including obesity, impaired baroreflex sensitivity, hyperinsulinemia, and elevated adipokine levels. Furthermore there is mounting evidence to suggest that chronic sympathetic overactivity can potentiate two of the key metabolic alterations of the MetS, central obesity and insulin resistance. This review will discuss the regulatory role of the sympathetic nervous system in metabolic control and the proposed pathophysiology linking sympathetic overactivity to metabolic abnormalities. Pharmacological and device-based approaches that target central sympathetic drive will also be discussed as possible therapeutic options to improve metabolic control in at-risk patient cohorts.

1. Introduction

Activation of the sympathetic nervous system exerts a number of physiological responses either directly through stimulation of postganglionic sympathetic nerves localised in target organs or indirectly through the activation of powerful humoral systems. While the importance of sympathetic tone is readily acknowledged for cardiovascular and blood pressure regulation it is less well appreciated that activation of the sympathetic nervous system forms an integral part of energy homeostasis and can exert profound metabolic effects.

Insufficient physical activity and excess energy intake, coupled with genetic programming, have been attributed to the rising incidence of obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, insulin resistance, and hyperglycemia in western societies. More importantly, the clustering of these metabolic conditions, referred to as the Metabolic Syndrome (MetS) [1], has become increasingly more common with one-quarter of all adults predicted to have MetS. Given the augmented risk for type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality associated with the MetS [24] there is growing interest in understanding the complex pathways underlying the metabolic derangements seen in the condition.

Accumulating data from animal and human studies suggest that central sympathetic activity plays a pivotal role in the aetiology and complications of MetS and its associated conditions. This is evidenced by a distinct preponderance for patients with the MetS to exhibit clinical signs of chronic sympathoexcitation such as elevated urinary noradrenaline levels, increased efferent muscle sympathetic nerve activity, and elevated rates of plasma noradrenaline spillover, even in the absence of hypertension [59]. Lifestyle modification is recommended as a first-line treatment of the MetS. Interestingly, recent evidence indicates that the benefits derived from diet and exercise induced weight loss are in part mediated by a reduction in sympathetic nerve activity [10]. Latest findings from clinical studies suggest pharmacological and device-based therapies (i.e., imidazoline agonists and catheter-based renal denervation) that specifically target central sympathetic outflow may also assist in improving metabolic control in these subjects. However, their long-term efficacy in ameliorating metabolic disease requires further investigation.

The purpose of this review is to present an overview of the evidence supporting the role of the sympathetic nervous system in metabolic control. This review will also focus on the possible mechanisms linking central sympathetic overactivity to the pathophysiology of the MetS, with particular emphasis on the putative role of the sympathetic nervous system in two key metabolic alterations, central obesity and insulin resistance. It will conclude by highlighting some of the emerging therapeutic options available for the treatment of MetS-related conditions that specifically target a reduction in central sympathetic activity.

2. Central Sympathetic Control and Its Role in Regulation of Metabolism

Central sympathetic outflow is principally driven by a network of neurons located in the rostral ventrolateral medulla. These neurons provide excitatory output to preganglionic neurons located in the intermediolateral cell column of the spinal cord that innervate several target organs through postganglionic sympathetic fibers. Excitatory drive can be intrinsically generated, chemically mediated, or differentially controlled via the cortical, limbic, and midbrain regions of the central nervous system. A number of afferent inputs from peripheral reflexes (i.e., arterial baroreflexes, chemoreceptors, and hormonal mediators) can stimulate the rostral ventrolateral medulla and alter sympathetic nerve activity via neurons that terminate in the nucleus tractus solitarius of the medulla oblongata. Additionally, circulating factors that are able to cross the blood-brain barrier via circumventricular organs can also influence central sympathetic outflow.

While the neuroanatomical interactions that govern the sympathetic nervous system are yet to be fully elucidated, sympathetic tone is recognised as an important mediator of cardiovascular function predominantly through its direct effects on beta-adrenergic receptors in the heart to modulate cardiac output and on alpha-adrenergic receptors in blood vessels to modulate arteriolar resistance and venous capacitance. Activation of adrenergic receptors in the kidney is also important for modulating blood pressure as neuronal noradrenaline promotes the release of renin from the juxtaglomerular apparatus, sodium retention, and vasoconstriction.

In terms of metabolism, the sympathetic nervous system is fundamental in controlling daily energy expenditure via the regulation of resting metabolic rate and initiation of thermogenesis in response to physiologically relevant stimuli, that is, changing energy states, food intake, carbohydrate consumption, hyperinsulinemia, and exposure to cold. Activation of sympathetic nerves innervating the liver, pancreas, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissue can also elicit acute catabolic responses (i.e., glycogenolysis and lipolysis). It is important to note that not all organs are targeted equally by the sympathetic nervous system with the metabolic effects ensuing from increased central sympathetic outflow dependent on the adrenergic receptors present in the target organ, the number of neurons recruited, and whether an individual is in a fasted or postprandial state.

As shown in Figure 1, acute activation of splanchnic sympathetic nerves innervating parenchymal cells in the liver is shown to produce a rapid and marked production of glucose following a meal but promotes gluconeogenesis when fasted [11]. Activation of the adrenal medulla can also stimulate the release of catecholamines to further promote hepatic glucose production. In the pancreas, activation of splanchnic sympathetic nerves promotes glucagon secretion via beta-adrenergic receptors on islet cells, which is secondary to the inhibition of insulin secretion via alpha-adrenergic receptor activation. Sympathetic nerves innervating skeletal muscle can modulate glucose uptake independent of a concomitant increase in plasma insulin levels via activation of beta-adrenergic receptors using cAMP as the second messenger. Conversely, neuronal stimulation of alpha-adrenergic receptors in arterioles, which elicits vasoconstriction, impairs glucose uptake in skeletal muscle.

Compared to the liver, pancreas, and skeletal muscle, which are also under parasympathetic control, adipose tissue is only innervated by sympathetic nerves making it an important regulator of lipid mobilization. Central sympathetic outflow directly stimulates adipocyte lipolysis by binding to beta-adrenergic receptors in white adipose tissue to activate cAMP-dependent pathways to translocate inactive lipase. Equally, if alpha-adrenergic receptors are activated, lipolysis is inhibited. Noradrenaline has also been shown to decrease the uptake of triglyceride-rich lipoprotein into white adipose tissue via the inhibition of the rate limiting enzyme lipoprotein lipase (LPL), while beta-adrenergic activation in skeletal muscle stimulates LPL activity and promotes lipid uptake. Due to its ability to express various adipokines, white adipose tissue can also regulate sympathetic output through the production of centrally acting peptide hormones. Of those adipokines that are secreted from adipose tissue and modulate central sympathetic activity, leptin is the best described. It is able to cross the blood-brain barrier to act directly on leptin receptors in higher brain regions involved in the regulation of sympathetic tone. In brown adipose tissue, direct neuronal activation of beta-adrenergic receptors during exposure to different environmental stimuli (i.e., exposure to cold) is shown to promote thermogenesis via the uncoupling of mitochondria.

While the metabolic processes that ensue from acute sympathetic activation may be desirable under certain circumstances, it is clear that chronic stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system has the potential to augment risk for MetS, through the development of obesity, hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance, and hypertension.

3. Metabolic Syndrome, Prediabetes, and Diabetes Risk

The MetS is a constellation of metabolic abnormalities characterized by central (abdominal) obesity, insulin resistance, hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and systemic inflammation that confers significant risk for the development of both type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease [1]. Central obesity is considered the cardinal feature of MetS with several major organizations recognizing waist circumference as the primary screening tool for MetS [12]. It is notable that subjects with central obesity often have more metabolic disorders and consequently are at greater risk of developing diabetes than those without central obesity [13]. Prediabetes is defined by impaired fasting glucose and/or impaired glucose tolerance with a glycosylated hemoglobin level (HbA1c) between 5.7 and 6.4% [14, 15]. Given that hyperglycemia is a component of the MetS and most individuals with MetS are insulin-resistant [16], it is often considered a prediabetic state. The observation that older, nondiabetic adults are two times more likely to have the MetS with hyperglycemia than hyperglycemia only confirms an overlap between the conditions [17].

The MetS is associated with a 5-fold increased risk for diabetes [18]. While most assume this to be driven by hyperglycemia, MetS without prediabetes carries a similar level of risk [19]. One of the reasons why the MetS is as strong a predictor of diabetes with or without prediabetes is the presence of central obesity [17] which not only acts to promote insulin resistance but can potentiate beta cell dysfunction through lipotoxicity [20].

4. Evidence of Sympathetic Dysfunction in Metabolic Conditions

There is substantial evidence in support of the sympathetic nervous system being exceedingly active in individuals with the MetS and its key metabolic alterations, central obesity, and insulin resistance. Compared to healthy lean individuals, obese adults are consistently shown to have raised urinary noradrenaline and metabolite levels [5] and elevated rates of whole-body noradrenaline spillover in plasma [21]. Furthermore, direct sympathetic nerve recording using microneurography demonstrates that obese individuals display increased resting sympathetic outflow to skeletal muscle [6, 22, 23]. Interestingly, the degree of sympathetic overactivity observed in obese individuals appears to be dependent on body fat distribution with central obesity shown to be associated with greater sympathetic nerve activation than subcutaneous obesity [7, 24]. The link between obesity and sympathetic overactivity is further strengthened by the observation that weight loss in obese individuals causes a marked decrease in muscle sympathetic nerve activity [6, 25] and increase in muscle sympathetic nerve activity following weight gain [26].

After a meal, the normal physiological response in healthy humans is to increase sympathetic nerve activity, as indicated by a rise in plasma noradrenaline concentrations and increase in muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Increased central sympathetic activity in the postprandial state is important to not only promote thermogenesis but induce compensatory peripheral vasoconstriction to maintain blood pressure following splanchnic vasodilatation [27]. Insulin-resistant individuals, particularly those whose insulin resistance is associated with central adiposity, display blunted sympathetic neuronal responses to physiological hyperinsulinemia, glucose consumption, and changes in energy states [8]. Indeed, Straznicky et al. confirmed that insulin-resistant subjects display a blunted sympathetic neural response to glucose ingestion compared with age- and blood pressure-matched insulin-sensitive subjects, despite a 2-fold greater increase in plasma insulin concentrations [28].

Evidence for sympathetic overactivity being linked to the onset of diabetes comes from several long-term prospective cohort studies that show both baseline noradrenaline levels and sympathetic reactivity predict future risk of insulin resistance and diabetes [2931]. Experimental studies in patients with type 2 diabetes show significantly augmented resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity compared to individuals with prediabetes [32] or obesity [33]. Blunted sympathetic responsiveness to glucose and elevated arterial noradrenaline levels are also more exaggerated in treatment naive type 2 diabetics compared to individuals with impaired glucose tolerance [32] suggesting that the progression from prediabetes to diabetes is characterized by profound disturbances in central sympathetic nerve activity.

5. Sympathetic Overactivity as a Consequence of Metabolic Dysfunction

Several pathophysiological mechanisms linking central sympathetic overactivity with the MetS and its core components of central obesity and insulin resistance have been proposed [34] with ongoing debate as to whether sympathetic overactivity is a consequence or a cause of metabolic dysfunction.

Landsberg first proposed a link between the development of metabolic abnormalities and the sympathetic nervous system 25 years ago when he hypothesised that elevated circulating insulin levels, resulting from insulin resistance associated with obesity, caused an elevation in central sympathetic activity, which precipitated the development of hypertension [35]. His hypothesis was based on observations in rodents that showed that overfeeding leads to an increase in sympathetic nerve activity and rise in blood pressure. Subsequent studies in healthy adults confirmed this occurrence with the infusion of insulin, in the presence of stable glucose levels, shown to increase muscle sympathetic nerve activity independent of insulin’s vasodilatory effects [36].

Figure 2 highlights some of the proposed neurohumoral pathways that potentiate sympathetic overactivity. These include direct activation of the sympathetic nervous system by higher cerebral nuclei during overfeeding and disruption of hypothalamic insulin-signalling. Other indirect mechanisms (in the presence of obesity) include hyperinsulinemia, increased leptin and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs) release from excess visceral fat, and reduced baroreceptor sensitivity and activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. The proposed mechanisms for sympathetic overactivity as a distinct consequence of metabolic dysfunction are discussed.

5.1. Overeating

Animal and human studies clearly show that over- and underfeeding can modulate sympathetic nerve activity [3739]. It has been proposed that chronic sympathetic activity in obesity is an adaptive physiological response used to stimulate thermogenesis and stabilize body weight during periods of overeating [40]. The notion that the autonomic nervous system acts to oppose weight change is supported by evidence from both normal weight and obese subjects that show modest weight gain is associated with an increase in sympathetic nerve activity and decrease in parasympathetic activity [38]. Chronic centrally mediated thermogenesis as a consequence of overfeeding does, however, come at the expense of sustained beta-adrenergic activation in the peripheral vasculature and kidneys which can precipitate a secondary rise in blood pressure via sodium retention and impaired pressure-natriuresis leading to obesity-related hypertension.

5.2. Hyperinsulinemia

The physiological association between insulin and sympathetic regulation is complex. In the body, insulin serves to reduce endogenous glucose production by directly inhibiting hepatic glycogenolysis or indirectly through the inhibition of lipolysis in adipose tissue, pancreatic glucagon production, or stimulation of insulin-dependent signalling pathways in the hypothalamus.

There are several lines of evidence to suggest that insulin exerts sympathoexcitatory effects via actions in the central nervous system [41]. Indeed, animal studies clearly show intracerebroventricular administration of insulin can augment central sympathetic activity [42]. Although insulin is not produced in significant amounts within the central nervous system, circulating insulin can gain access via saturable transport-mediated uptake across the blood-brain barrier [43, 44]. Cassaglia et al. recently identified the arcuate nucleus in the hypothalamus as one of the critical sites where insulin acts to increase sympathetic nerve activity and the sympathetic baroreflex [45]. It is postulated that the sympathoexcitatory effects of insulin result from suppressed inhibition of neuropeptide Y (NPY) neurons that project from the arcuate nucleus to the paraventricular nucleus. Following a meal, centrally acting insulin exerts anorexigenic effects in the hypothalamus via stimulation of proopiomelanocortin (POMC) and inhibition of NYP neurons. However, during chronic overfeeding, NPY gene expression in the arcuate nucleus is paradoxically elevated [46] as a consequence of hyperinsulinemia-mediated alterations in insulin receptor and insulin-signalling pathways potentiating “central insulin resistance.” Activation of NPY neurons promotes potent orexigenic effects via increased sympathetic outflow to the liver resulting in hepatic insulin resistance and increased endogenous glucose production. In animals, intracerebroventricular administration of NPY is shown to promote hyperphagia, hyperinsulinemia, insulin resistance, and obesity [4749].

In humans, systemic but not local infusion of insulin stimulates an increase in sympathetic nerve activity supporting the notion that insulin’s sympathoexcitatory effects are not mediated by a local mechanism [50]. Of note, the sympathetic response elicited by insulin in humans is far more heterogeneous than in animals. In healthy young adults, insulin infusion during constant plasma glucose concentration is shown to cause regionalised elevations in sympathetic nerve activity to skeletal muscle [51] but not the kidneys [52]. Furthermore the effect of acute hyperinsulinemia on muscle sympathetic nerve activity is more pronounced in lean adults compared to obese [36]. In hyperinsulinemic obese individuals with chronically elevated levels of circulating insulin, the normal central effects of insulin are blunted leading to increased endogenous glucose production (via activation of sympathetic outflow to the liver) and sustained sympathetic activation via the insulin feedback loop.

Given the observation that hyperinsulinemia causes regionalised sympathetic activity only (specifically to skeletal muscle) and subjects with obesity and hypertension are shown to have elevated renal noradrenaline spillover to plasma it is questionable whether hyperinsulinemia is the main mediator of central sympathetic overactivity observed in the MetS.

5.3. Increased Visceral Adiposity

Visceral white adipose tissue is a highly metabolic organ that not only accompanies but antedates other components of the MetS including insulin resistance, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and inflammation. Among the various indices of obesity, it is abdominal visceral obesity that is shown to be the strongest determinant of muscle sympathetic nerve activity in adults, with sympathetic nerve firing 55% greater in males with abdominal visceral obesity compared to men with subcutaneous obesity [24, 53].

Animal and human data show certain adipokines expressed by white adipose tissue, namely, leptin and nonesterified fatty acids, can contribute indirectly towards sympathetic nerve activity. Leptin is present in serum concentrations directly proportionate to adipose tissue mass and is shown to be elevated in human obesity [54]. It can act directly on skeletal muscle to impair glucose transporter-4 (GLUT-4) translocation and induce hyperinsulinemia resulting in coactivation of the sympathetic nervous system. Alternatively, leptin can act centrally in several brain regions (primarily the hypothalamus and brainstem) that control multiple metabolic functions via melanocortin-system-dependent pathways to increase sympathetic activity [55]. Very recent data suggests that leptin also acts at the level of the nucleus of the solitary tract to alter neurons involved in baroreflex sensitivity [56]. The main central effect of leptin is a reduction in appetite and increase in energy expenditure via sympathetic activation. It has been postulated that, in obesity, neurons located in the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus that express leptin receptors become desensitized to chronically elevated levels of leptin (hyperleptinemia) suppressing its anorexigenic effects while selectively preserving sympathoexcitation (known as “selective leptin resistance”) [57, 58]. Animal models of obesity support this with leptin resistance in the hypothalamus shown to decrease satiety but preserve sympathetic activity [59].

While acute administration of leptin elicits a marked rise in muscle sympathetic activity in healthy lean men [60] there is some doubt as to whether leptin is the principal driver of chronic sympathetic activation in the MetS. Compared to nonobese adults, adults with high levels of subcutaneous fat who display 2-3-fold higher plasma leptin levels do not exhibit increased muscle sympathetic nerve activity [53]. Furthermore longitudinal studies in young Japanese adults reveal elevations in plasma noradrenaline levels precede both weight gain and increases in plasma leptin levels [29, 61] suggesting hyperleptinemia is ancillary to sympathetic stimulation associated with obesity.

Several studies in human show a positive correlation between circulating plasma nonesterified fatty acids (NEFAs), obesity, and insulin resistance [62]. As with leptin, NEFAs are able to act locally in peripheral tissue to disrupt insulin signaling and impair glucose uptake or can act centrally. Although it is unclear how NEFAs activate central sympathetic nerve activity, the infusion of NEFA is shown to increase muscle sympathetic activity in lean healthy adults [63]. There is also evidence that central sympathetic activation contributes to the increased alpha-adrenoceptor mediated pressor sensitivity observed with acute elevations in NEFA [64]. Despite evidence to support a possible interaction between NEFA and the sympathetic nervous system, others have shown no change in whole-body and renal noradrenaline spillover during NEFA infusion [65] highlighting the need for further research in this area.

5.4. Activation of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis (HPA)

Stress-induced elevations in glucocorticoids are associated with profound metabolic abnormalities including insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, dyslipidemia, increased central adiposity, and hypertension suggesting that chronic stress may in part contribute to the development of the MetS [66]. Findings from a nested, case-control study of the Whitehall II study show both the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal HPA axis and sympathetic nerve activity are elevated in MetS subjects [67] providing a possible causal link between chronic stress and sympathetic activation. Experimental findings from animal and human studies lend further support to the coactivation of these brain centres during metabolic abnormalities, that is, obesity-induced hyperinsulinemia. Direct intracerebroventricular administration of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) in primates is shown to promote sympathoexcitatory effects that lead to an increase in plasma noradrenaline levels, hyperglycemia, and elevations in blood pressure. Importantly, these effects are only attenuated following administration of a ganglionic blocker not a CRH antagonist [68] suggesting hyperglycemia associated with HPA axis activation is secondary to central sympathetic activation. In obese adults with increased sympathetic nerve activity, chronic administration of dexamethasone is shown to attenuate elevations in both plasma cortisol and muscle sympathetic nerve activity but not in lean adults [69].

5.5. Reduced Baroreflex Sensitivity

The arterial baroreflex is designed to buffer beat-to-beat fluctuations in arterial blood pressure. It exerts profound sympathoinhibitory effects during increasing arterial pressure [70]. In patients with MetS, the sympathoinhibition and sympathoexcitatory effects induced by baroreceptor stimulation and deactivation, respectively, are impaired [8]. Arterial baroreflex activity is also blunted in patients with visceral obesity [71], hypertension [72], insulin resistance, and early onset diabetes [28] suggesting baroreflex impairment may play a causal role in the sympathoexcitatory state observed in the MetS. Baroreceptors located in the carotid sinus and aortic arch are highly sensitive to stretch in the vessel wall and it has been postulated that reduced arterial distensibility can blunt baroreceptor discharge during increased arterial pressure resulting in chronic stimulation of efferent sympathetic outflow to the periphery.

6. Sympathetic Overactivity as a Cause of Metabolic Dysfunction

In support of a primary role of the sympathetic nervous system in metabolic abnormalities that cluster to form the MetS, several prospective studies clearly show that elevated noradrenaline levels can precede clinical manifestations of obesity and hypertension. In an elegant study of Japanese ship builders, Masuo et al. showed increased levels of circulating plasma noradrenaline independently predicted weight gain, elevated insulin levels, and blood pressure elevation during a 10-year follow-up period [29, 61]. Similar results over a 20-year follow-up period have been observed for weight gain in Norwegian men [73].

6.1. Obesity

Julius et al. first proposed that increased sympathetic activity was the primary defect leading to insulin resistance and weight gain in obese adults [74]. Increased sympathetic nerve activity is vital in the dissipation of energy following food consumption via activation of beta-receptors and it is proposed that chronic sympathetic nerve activity can potentiate weight gain leading to obesity as a consequence of diminished sensitivity of beta-adrenoceptors. In vitro and in vivo studies clearly show that prolonged adrenergic stimulation results in desensitization of beta-receptor mediated responses [75, 76]. Downregulation of beta-adrenoceptors leading to a blunted thermogenic response to food can potentiate insulin resistance and perpetuate the negative feedback cycle between insulin governing sympathetic outflows. Evidence in support of weight gain being directly related to decreased beta-adrenergic responsiveness comes from studies that show that both short-term [77] and chronic [78, 79] pharmacological blockade of beta-receptors leads to an increase in body weight.

6.2. Insulin Resistance

Due to the complex interactions between the sympathetic nervous system, hyperglycemia, hyperinsulinemia, metabolism, and insulin resistance it is difficult to define the primary insult that leads to metabolic dysfunction. As alluded to above, there is evidence in support of hyperinsulinemia promoting sympathetic nerve activity. It has also been proposed that insulin resistance is a secondary phenomenon precipitated by an increase in sympathetic tone [20, 80]. Evidence that sympathetic overactivity precedes the development of insulin resistance and prediabetes is supported by findings from a study of young Norwegian males where elevation in plasma norepinephrine during a cold pressor test was shown to predict hyperglycemia and impaired insulin sensitivity (as measured by HOMA-IR index) at 18-year follow-up [30].

Increased sympathetic outflow to skeletal muscle plays an important role in glucose metabolism primarily through eliciting reductions in skeletal muscle blood flow [81]. Indeed, an acute increase in sympathetic nerve activity has been shown to cause insulin resistance in the forearm of healthy adults [81]. Alpha-adrenergic vasoconstriction resulting from chronic sympathetic activity can blunt postprandial increases in skeletal muscle blood flow impairing glucose uptake and stimulating additional insulin production by the pancreas leading to insulin resistance [82]. In support of elevated sympathetic nerve activity promoting insulin resistance through peripheral vasoconstriction, administration of peripherally acting vasoactive agents has been shown to improve insulin sensitivity in obese hypertensive patients [83, 84].

7. Targeting Central Sympathetic Inhibition to Improve Metabolic Control

Given the important role sympathetic overactivity plays in metabolic abnormalities, inhibition of the sympathetic nervous system represents a logical and attractive therapeutic approach to treat the MetS and potentially reduce overall diabetes and CVD risk. It is possible to reduce central sympathetic activity through lifestyle modification, namely, energy-restricted diets and physical training [6, 10, 85] although recent evidence suggests pharmacological and device-based interventions targeting central sympathetic outflow are also likely to be of benefit.

7.1. Lifestyle Intervention

Evidence from the Diabetes Prevention Program and Oslo Diet and Exercise study clearly demonstrate the important metabolic benefits that can be derived from intensive lifestyle interventions [86, 87]. Whilst exercise training is shown to improve sympathoinhibition (preferentially to the kidneys) [88] and potentiate baroreflex sensitivity [25, 89] there is strong evidence to suggest that weight loss, in particular abdominal fat loss, is the most important determinant of sympathetic neural adaption to improve hemodynamic and metabolic parameters in adults with the MetS. In an elegant study by Straznicky et al., middle-aged subjects with the MetS who lost 9% of their body weight after undergoing a 12-week hypocaloric diet were shown to have significantly improved resting muscle sympathetic nerve activity, whole-body noradrenaline spillover, and whole-body insulin sensitivity. Fasting serum triglycerides and plasma leptin levels were also reduced. The addition of moderate-intensity physical activity may help augment the improvements observed in sympathoinhibition and metabolic outcomes [10].

7.2. Pharmacological Therapy

Pharmacological inhibition of sympathetic nerve activity to achieve sustained weight loss and improvements in insulin sensitivity, glucose tolerance, dyslipidemia, and hypertension is currently under intense investigation. Therapies targeting central sympathetic outflow, in particular, are thought to offer the greatest benefits as they may not only improve metabolic control but also help to regress end-organ damage.

Imidazoline I1 agonists act centrally at the level of the rostral ventrolateral medulla to inhibit sympathetic drive. Moxonidine is a second-generation imidazoline I1 agonist for the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension via inhibition of central sympathetic outflow. Moxonidine is also shown to exert beneficial effects on a diverse range of metabolic parameters including improvements in indices of glycaemic control, insulin sensitivity, dyslipidemia, and inflammation [9093]. It also promotes weight loss by lowering leptin plasma levels in obese patients [94] and has been associated with improved renal function [95, 96], endothelial homeostatic mechanisms [97], and a reduction in left ventricular hypertrophy [91].

The capacity of moxonidine to improve several metabolic measures in addition to its effect on blood pressure makes it an attractive therapeutic option for the treatment of MetS and to reduce overall CVD risk. In a recent large, multinational, open-label 6-month uncontrolled observational study daily moxonidine use (either as a monotherapy or as an adjunct therapy) was shown to not only reduce blood pressure but also lower the CVD risk profile of MetS patients. This was achieved by improving, albeit modestly, several metabolic indices ranging from weight reduction of 2.1 kg, decrease of 0.6 mmol/L in triglycerides, and decline of 5 beats/minute in heart rate [93]. Larger studies with longer duration of follow-up are needed to confirm these promising findings.

7.3. Device-Based Therapeutics

Catheter-based renal denervation has emerged as a safe and effective therapy to lower central sympathetic nerve activity. Indeed, several studies show renal denervation lowers (by 50%) renal sympathetic nerve activity (as assessed by renal noradrenaline spillover) [98], whole-body sympathetic nerve activity, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity [99]. The therapy, which involves selective radiofrequency ablation of efferent and afferent sympathetic nerves in the renal artery lumen, is currently only recommended for use in patients with resistant hypertension to lower uncontrolled blood pressure. However, distinct benefits have been reported in relation to glucose metabolism [100]. Most recently, Mahfoud et al. reported for 37 drug-resistant hypertensive patients who underwent renal denervation, improvements in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were accompanied by significant reductions in fasting plasma glucose, insulin, and C-peptide as well as 2-hour postload glucose levels at 3-month follow-up. Insulin sensitivity as measured by the HOMA-IR and IS QUICKI index measures was also improved at 6-month follow-up. These beneficial metabolic alterations were not observed in the control group () who continued their usual medication regime [100].

Further support of the beneficial effects on glucose metabolism following renal denervation has been reported in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome [101] and obstructive sleep apnea [102], two conditions that are characterised by multiple metabolic disturbances. In women with polycystic ovary syndrome, renal denervation was shown to lower fasting plasma glucose, improve insulin sensitivity (assessed by euglycaemic hyperinsulinemic clamp), and reduce both muscle sympathetic nerve activity and whole-body noradrenaline spillover at 3-month follow-up [101]. Importantly these metabolic effects were shown to occur in the absence of any changes in body weight. In a small study of 10 patients with obstructive sleep apnea, renal denervation was associated with improved 2-hour glucose levels during an oral glucose tolerance test and reduced HbA1c levels at 6 months following renal denervation [102].

8. Summary

The sympathetic nervous system plays a pivotal role in regulating metabolic control. While acute sympathetic activation may be desirable under certain circumstances, it is clear that chronic stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system has the potential to augment risk for the MetS through the development of obesity, hyperglycaemia, insulin resistance, and hypertension. While the exact mechanisms are yet to be fully elucidated, several lines of evidence suggest that sympathetic nervous system overactivity is important both in the initiation and the maintenance of metabolic abnormalities commonly seen in the MetS. Latest findings from pharmaceutical and device-based clinical trials are encouraging for targeting central sympathetic activity to improve metabolic control in patients with the MetS who are at heightened risk for diabetes and cardiovascular disease. From a research perspective, studies are needed to ascertain whether these latest therapies can ameliorate metabolic disease and attenuate future end-organ damage commonly associated with chronic sympathetic nerve activity.

Conflict of Interests

Markus P. Schlaich is an investigator in studies sponsored by Medtronic and has received honoraria and lecture fees. Alicia A. Thorp has no conflict of interests to disclose.


Markus P. Schlaich is supported by a Senior Research Fellowship from the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) of Australia. Alicia A. Thorp is supported by an NHMRC of Australia Grant. This research was funded in part by the grants from the National Health and Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) and the Victorian Government’s Operational Infrastructure Support Program.


  1. K. G. M. M. Alberti, P. Zimmet, and J. Shaw, “The metabolic syndrome—a new worldwide definition,” The Lancet, vol. 366, no. 9491, pp. 1059–1062, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. E. S. Ford, “Risks for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes associated with the metabolic syndrome: a summary of the evidence,” Diabetes Care, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1769–1778, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. Malik, N. D. Wong, S. S. Franklin et al., “Impact of the metabolic syndrome on mortality from coronary heart disease, cardiovascular disease, and all causes in United States adults,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 10, pp. 1245–1250, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. M. Dekker, C. Girman, T. Rhodes et al., “Metabolic syndrome and 10-year cardiovascular disease risk in the Hoorn Study,” Circulation, vol. 112, no. 5, pp. 666–673, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Z. S. K. Lee, J. A. J. H. Critchley, B. Tomlinson et al., “Urinary epinephrine and norepinephrine interrelations with obesity, insulin, and the metabolic syndrome in Hong Kong Chinese,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 135–143, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. N. E. Straznicky, E. A. Lambert, G. W. Lambert, K. Masuo, M. D. Esler, and P. J. Nestel, “Effects of dietary weight loss on sympathetic activity and cardiac risk factors associated with the metabolic syndrome,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 90, no. 11, pp. 5998–6005, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. E. Straznicky, N. Eikelis, E. A. Lambert, and M. D. Esler, “Mediators of sympathetic activation in metabolic syndrome obesity,” Current Hypertension Reports, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 440–447, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. Grassi, R. Dell'Oro, F. Quarti-Trevano et al., “Neuroadrenergic and reflex abnormalities in patients with metabolic syndrome,” Diabetologia, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1359–1365, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. M. Schlaich, N. Straznicky, E. Lambert, and G. Lambert, “Metabolic syndrome: a sympathetic disease?” The Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 148–157, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. N. E. Straznicky, E. A. Lambert, P. J. Nestel et al., “Sympathetic neural adaptation to hypocaloric diet with or without exercise training in obese metabolic syndrome subjects,” Diabetes, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Jarhult, B. Falck, S. Ingemansson, and A. Nobin, “The functional importance of sympathetic nerves to the liver and endocrine pancreas,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 189, no. 1, pp. 96–100, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. K. G. M. M. Alberti, R. H. Eckel, S. M. Grundy et al., “Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; national heart, lung, and blood institute; American heart association; world heart federation; international atherosclerosis society; and international association for the study of obesity,” Circulation, vol. 120, no. 16, pp. 1640–1645, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. Y. Matsuzawa, “Pathophysiology and molecular mechanisms of visceral fat syndrome: the Japanese experience,” Diabetes/Metabolism Reviews, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 3–13, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  14. World Health Organization, Definition and Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus and Intermediate Hyperglycemia: Report of a WHO/IDF Consultation, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
  15. American Diabetes Association, “Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, supplement 1, pp. S62–S69, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. A. J. G. Hanley, L. E. Wagenknecht, R. B. D'Agostino Jr., B. Zinman, and S. M. Haffner, “Identification of subjects with insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction using alternative definitions of the metabolic syndrome,” Diabetes, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2740–2747, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. M. Alexander, P. B. Landsman, and S. M. Grundy, “Metabolic syndrome and hyperglycemia: congruence and divergence,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 98, no. 7, pp. 982–985, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. P. Stern, K. Williams, C. González-Villalpando, K. J. Hunt, and S. M. Haffner, “Does the metabolic syndrome improve identification of individuals at risk of type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease?” Diabetes Care, vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 2676–2681, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. C. Lorenzo, K. Williams, K. J. Hunt, and S. M. Haffner, “The National Cholesterol Education Program—Adult Treatment Panel III, International Diabetes Federation, and World Health Organization definitions of the metabolic syndrome as predictors of incident cardiovascular disease and diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 8–13, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. D. Baron, M. Laakso, G. Brechtel, B. Hoit, C. Watt, and S. V. Edelman, “Reduced postprandial skeletal muscle blood flow contributes to glucose intolerance in human obesity,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 1525–1533, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Vaz, G. Jennings, A. Turner, H. Cox, G. Lambert, and M. Esler, “Regional sympathetic nervous activity and oxygen consumption in obese normotensive human subjects,” Circulation, vol. 96, no. 10, pp. 3423–3429, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. G. Grassi, G. Seravalle, B. M. Cattaneo et al., “Sympathetic activation in obese normotensive subjects,” Hypertension, vol. 25, no. 4, Part 1, pp. 560–563, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. Grassi, R. Dell'Oro, A. Facchini, F. Q. Trevano, G. B. Bolla, and G. Mancia, “Effect of central and peripheral body fat distribution on sympathetic and baroreflex function in obese normotensives,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 2363–2369, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. G. E. Alvarez, S. D. Beske, T. P. Ballard, and K. P. Davy, “Sympathetic neural activation in visceral obesity,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 20, pp. 2533–2536, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. G. Grassi, G. Seravalle, M. Colombo et al., “Body weight reduction, sympathetic nerve traffic, and arterial baroreflex in obese normotensive humans,” Circulation, vol. 97, no. 20, pp. 2037–2042, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. L. Gentile, J. S. Orr, B. M. Davy, and K. P. Davy, “Modest weight gain is associated with sympathetic neural activation in nonobese humans,” The American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 292, no. 5, pp. R1834–R1838, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. J. Fagius, “Sympathetic nerve activity in metabolic control—some basic concepts,” Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 337–343, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. E. Straznicky, G. W. Lambert, K. Masuo et al., “Blunted sympathetic neural response to oral glucose in obese subjects with the insulin-resistant metabolic syndrome,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 27–36, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. Masuo, H. Mikami, T. Ogihara, and M. L. Tuck, “Sympathetic nerve hyperactivity precedes hyperinsulinemia and blood pressure elevation in a young, nonobese Japanese population,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 77–83, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. A. Flaa, T. A. Aksnes, S. E. Kjeldsen, I. Eide, and M. Rostrup, “Increased sympathetic reactivity may predict insulin resistance: an 18-year follow-up study,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1422–1427, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. R. Carnethon, S. H. Golden, A. R. Folsom, W. Haskell, and D. Liao, “Prospective investigation of autonomic nervous system function and the development of type 2 diabetes: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study, 1987–1998,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 17, pp. 2190–2195, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. N. E. Straznicky, M. T. Grima, C. I. Sari et al., “Neuroadrenergic dysfunction along the diabetes continuum: a comparative study in obese metabolic syndrome subjects,” Diabetes, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 2506–2516, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  33. R. J. Huggett, E. M. Scott, S. G. Gilbey, J. B. Stoker, A. F. Mackintosh, and D. A. S. G. Mary, “Impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on sympathetic neural mechanisms in hypertension,” Circulation, vol. 108, no. 25, pp. 3097–3101, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. G. W. Lambert, N. E. Straznicky, E. A. Lambert, J. B. Dixon, and M. P. Schlaich, “Sympathetic nervous activation in obesity and the metabolic syndrome—causes, consequences and therapeutic implications,” Pharmacology and Therapeutics, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 159–172, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. Landsberg, “Diet, obesity and hypertension: an hypothesis involving insulin, the sympathetic nervous system, and adaptive thermogenesis,” Quarterly Journal of Medicine, vol. 61, no. 236, pp. 1081–1090, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  36. P. Vollenweider, L. Tappy, D. Randin et al., “Differential effects of hyperinsulinemia and carbohydrate metabolism on sympathetic nerve activity and muscle blood flow in humans,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 92, no. 1, pp. 147–154, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. O'Dea, M. Esler, P. Leonard, J. R. Stockigt, and P. Nestel, “Noradrenaline turnover during under- and over-eating in normal weight subjects,” Metabolism, vol. 31, no. 9, pp. 896–899, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. J. Aronne, R. Mackintosh, M. Rosenbaum, R. L. Leibel, and J. Hirsch, “Autonomic nervous system activity in weight gain and weight loss,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 269, no. 1, part 2, pp. R222–R225, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  39. S. Welle, R. G. Schwartz, and M. Statt, “Reduced metabolic rate during β-adrenergic blockade in humans,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 619–622, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. Landsberg, “Insulin-mediated sympathetic stimulation: role in the pathogenesis of obesity-related hypertension (or, how insulin affects blood pressure, and why),” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 19, no. 3, part 2, pp. 523–528, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. S. Muntzel, E. A. Anderson, A. K. Johnson, and A. L. Mark, “Mechanisms of insulin action on sympathetic nerve activity,” Clinical and Experimental Hypertension, vol. 17, no. 1-2, pp. 39–50, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. M. S. Muntzel, D. A. Morgan, A. L. Mark, and A. K. Johnson, “Intracerebroventricular insulin produces nonuniform regional increases in sympathetic nerve activity,” The American Journal of Physiology—Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 267, no. 5, pp. R1350–R1355, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  43. W. A. Banks, “The source of cerebral insulin,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 490, no. 1–3, pp. 5–12, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. C. Woods, R. J. Seeley, D. G. Baskin, and M. W. Schwartz, “Insulin and the blood-brain barrier,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 795–800, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. P. A. Cassaglia, S. M. Hermes, S. A. Aicher, and V. L. Brooks, “Insulin acts in the arcuate nucleus to increase lumbar sympathetic nerve activity and baroreflex function in rats,” Journal of Physiology, vol. 589, no. 7, pp. 1643–1662, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Wang, S. Obici, K. Morgan, N. Barzilai, Z. Feng, and L. Rossetti, “Overfeeding rapidly induces leptin and insulin resistance,” Diabetes, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 2786–2791, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. B. G. Stanley, S. E. Kyrkouli, S. Lampert, and S. F. Leibowitz, “Neuropeptide Y chronically injected into the hypothalamus: a powerful neurochemical inducer of hyperphagia and obesity,” Peptides, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1189–1192, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. R. Vettor, N. Zarjevski, I. Cusin, F. Rohner-Jeanrenaud, and B. Jeanrenaud, “Induction and reversibility of an obesity syndrome by intracerebroventricular neuropeptide Y administration to normal rats,” Diabetologia, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1202–1208, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. N. Zarjevski, I. Cusin, R. Vettor, F. Rohner-Jeanrenaud, and B. Jeanrenaud, “Chronic intracerebroventricular neuropeptide-Y administration to normal rats mimics hormonal and metabolic changes of obesity,” Endocrinology, vol. 133, no. 4, pp. 1753–1758, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. G. Lembo, R. Napoli, B. Capaldo et al., “Abnormal sympathetic overactivity evoked by insulin in the skeletal muscle of patients with essential hypertension,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 27–29, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  51. E. A. Anderson, R. P. Hoffman, T. W. Balon, C. A. Sinkey, and A. L. Mark, “Hyperinsulinemia produces both sympathetic neural activation and vasodilation in normal humans,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 87, no. 6, pp. 2246–2252, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. S. Gudbjornsdottir, P. Friberg, M. Elam, S. Attvall, P. Lonnroth, and B. G. Wallin, “The effect of metformin and insulin on sympathetic nerve activity, norepinephrine spillover and blood pressure in obese, insulin resistant, normoglycemic, hypertensive men,” Blood Pressure, vol. 3, no. 6, pp. 394–403, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. G. E. Alvarez, T. P. Ballard, S. D. Beske, and K. P. Davy, “Subcutaneous obesity is not associated with sympathetic neural activation,” The American Journal of Physiology—Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 287, no. 1, pp. H414–H418, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Mapfei, J. Halaas, E. Ravussin et al., “Leptin levels in human and rodent: measurement of plasma leptin and ob RNA in obese and weight-reduced subjects,” Nature Medicine, vol. 1, no. 11, pp. 1155–1161, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. A. da Silva, J. M. D. Carmo, and J. E. Hall, “Role of leptin and central nervous system melanocortins in obesity hypertension,” Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 135–140, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. Ciriello, “Leptin in nucleus of the solitary tract alters the cardiovascular responses to aortic baroreceptor activation,” Peptides, vol. 44, pp. 1–7, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. L. Mark, M. L. G. Correia, K. Rahmouni, and W. G. Haynes, “Selective leptin resistance: a new concept in leptin physiology with cardiovascular implications,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1245–1250, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. M. G. Myers, M. A. Cowley, and H. Münzberg, “Mechanisms of leptin action and leptin resistance,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 70, pp. 537–556, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. K. Rahmouni, D. A. Morgan, G. M. Morgan, A. L. Mark, and W. G. Haynes, “Role of selective leptin resistance in diet-induced obesity hypertension,” Diabetes, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 2012–2018, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. F. Machleidt, P. Simon, A. F. Krapalis, M. Hallschmid, H. Lehnert, and F. Sayk, “Experimental hyperleptinemia acutely increases vasoconstrictory sympathetic nerve activity in healthy humans,” Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 98, no. 3, pp. E491–E496, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. K. Masuo, H. Mikami, T. Ogihara, and M. L. Tuck, “Weight gain-induced blood pressure elevation,” Hypertension, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1135–1140, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. G. Boden, “Free fatty acids—the link between obesity and insulin resistance,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. J. P. Florian and J. A. Pawelczyk, “Sympathetic and haemodynamic responses to lipids in healthy human ageing,” Experimental Physiology, vol. 95, no. 4, pp. 486–497, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. T. Haastrup, K. T. Stepniakowski, T. L. Goodfriend, and B. M. Egan, “Intralipid enhances α1-adrenergic receptor-mediated pressor sensitivity,” Hypertension, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 693–698, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. R. J. Grekin, C.-O. Ngarmukos, D. M. Williams, and M. A. Supiano, “Renal norepinephrine spillover during infusion of nonesterified fatty acids,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 422–426, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. Wang, “The role of glucocorticoid action in the pathophysiology of the Metabolic Syndrome,” Nutrition & Metabolism (London), vol. 2, no. 1, p. 3, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  67. E. J. Brunner, H. Hemingway, B. R. Walker et al., “Adrenocortical, autonomic, and inflammatory causes of the metabolic syndrome: nested case-control study,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 21, pp. 2659–2665, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. R. Brown, L. A. Fisher, J. Spiess, C. Rivier, J. Rivier, and W. Vale, “Corticotropin-releasing factor: actions on the sympathetic nervous system and metabolism,” Endocrinology, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 928–931, 1982. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. G. Grassi, G. Seravalle, R. Dell'Oro et al., “Participation of the hypothalamus-hypophysis axis in the sympathetic activation of human obesity,” Hypertension, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 1316–1320, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. G. Mancia, G. Grassi, C. Giannattasio, and G. Seravalle, “Sympathetic activation in the pathogenesis of hypertension and progression of organ damage,” Hypertension, vol. 34, no. 4, part 2, pp. 724–728, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. I. Skrapari, N. Tentolouris, D. Perrea, C. Bakoyiannis, A. Papazafiropoulou, and N. Katsilambros, “Baroreflex sensitivity in obesity: relationship with cardiac autonomic nervous system activity,” Obesity, vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 1685–1693, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. G. Grassi, G. Seravalle, R. Dell'Oro, C. Turri, G. B. Bolla, and G. Mancia, “Adrenergic and reflex abnormalities in obesity-related hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 538–542, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. H. Gudmundsdottir, A. Strand, S. Kjeldsen, A. Hoieggen, and I. Os, “Arterial noradrenaline predicts rise in body mass index in a 20-year follow-up of lean normotensive and hypertensive men,” Jounral of Hypertension, vol. 26, p. S347, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  74. S. Julius, M. Valentini, and P. Palatini, “Overweight and hypertension: a 2-way street?” Hypertension, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 807–813, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. M. J. Lohse, “Molecular mechanisms of membrane receptor desensitization,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta—Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1179, no. 2, pp. 171–188, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. W. P. Hausdorff, M. G. Caron, and R. J. Lefkowitz, “Turning off the signal: desensitization of β-adrenergic receptor function,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 4, no. 11, pp. 2881–2889, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  77. R. R. Townsend and S. Klein, “Lipolytic sensitivity and response to fasting in normotensive and hypertensive obese humans,” Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental, vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1080–1084, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. H. Lithell, T. Pollare, C. Berne, and B. Saltin, “The metabolic and circulatory response to beta-blockade in hypertensive men is correlated to muscle capillary density.,” Blood pressure, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. S. Rossner, C. L. Taylor, R. P. Byington, and C. D. Furberg, “Long term propranolol treatment and changes in body weight after myocardial infarction,” British Medical Journal, vol. 300, no. 6729, pp. 902–903, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. S. Julius, T. Gudbrandsson, K. Jamerson, and O. Andersson, “The interconnection between sympathetics, microcirculation, and insulin resistance in hypertension,” Blood Pressure, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–19, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. K. A. Jamerson, S. Julius, T. Gudbrandsson, O. Andersson, and D. O. Brant, “Reflex sympathetic activation induces acute insulin resistance in the human forearm,” Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 618–623, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. S. Julius and M. Valentini, “Consequences of the increased autonomic nervous drive in hypertension, heart failure and diabetes,” Blood Pressure, Supplement, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 5–13, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  83. T. Pollare, H. Lithell, and C. Berne, “A comparison of the effects of hydrochlorothiazide and captopril on glucose and lipid metabolism in patients with hypertension,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 321, no. 13, pp. 868–873, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. T. Pollare, H. Lithell, I. Selinus, and C. Berne, “Application of prazosin is associated with an increase of insulin sensitivity in obese patients with hypertension,” Diabetologia, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 415–420, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. N. E. Straznicky, G. W. Lambert, M. T. McGrane et al., “Weight loss may reverse blunted sympathetic neural responsiveness to glucose ingestion in obese subjects with metabolic syndrome,” Diabetes, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1126–1132, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. T. J. Orchard, M. Temprosa, R. Goldberg et al., “The effect of metformin and intensive lifestyle intervention on the metabolic syndrome: the Diabetes Prevention Program randomized trial,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 142, no. 8, pp. 611–619, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. S. A. Anderssen, S. Carroll, P. Urdal, and I. Holme, “Combined diet and exercise intervention reverses the metabolic syndrome in middle-aged males: Results from the Oslo Diet and Exercise Study,” Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 687–695, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. I. T. Meredith, P. Friberg, G. L. Jennings et al., “Exercise training lowers resting renal but not cardiac sympathetic activity in humans,” Hypertension, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 575–582, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. G. Grassi, G. Seravalle, D. A. Calhoun, and G. Mancia, “Physical training and baroreceptor control of sympathetic nerve activity in humans,” Hypertension, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 294–301, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. M. K. Pöyhönen-Alho, K. Manhem, P. Katzman et al., “Central sympatholytic therapy has anti-inflammatory properties in hypertensive postmenopausal women,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 26, no. 12, pp. 2445–2449, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. E. Topal, A. S. Cikim, K. Cikim, I. Temel, and R. Ozdemir, “The effect of moxonidine on endothelial dysfunction in metabolic syndrome,” The American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 343–348, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. I. Chazova, V. A. Almazov, and E. Shlyakhto, “Moxonidine improves glycaemic control in mildly hypertensive, overweight patients: a comparison with metformin,” Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 456–465, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. I. Chazova and M. P. Schlaich, “Improved hypertension control with the imidazoline agonist moxonidine in a multinational metabolic syndrome population: principal results of the mersy study,” International Journal of Hypertension, vol. 2013, Article ID 541689, 9 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. E. Karlafti, C. H. Savopoulos, M. Baltatzi et al., “The position of central acting sympatholytic agents on arterial hypertension therapy,” Arterial Hypertension (Greek), vol. 19, pp. 32–43, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  95. K. Strojek, W. Grzeszczak, J. Górska, M. I. Leschinger, and E. Ritz, “Lowering of microalbuminuria in diabetic patients by a sympathicoplegic agent: novel approach to prevent progression of diabetic nephropathy?” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 602–605, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  96. O. Vonend, P. Marsalek, H. Russ, R. Wulkow, V. Oberhauser, and L. C. Rump, “Moxonidine treatment of hypertensive patients with advanced renal failure,” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1709–1717, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. P. G. Krespi, T. K. Makris, A. N. Hatzizacharias et al., “Moxonidine effect on microalbuminuria, thrombomodulin, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels in patients with essential hypertension,” Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 463–467, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. H. Krum, M. Schlaich, R. Whitbourn et al., “Catheter-based renal sympathetic denervation for resistant hypertension: a multicentre safety and proof-of-principle cohort study,” The Lancet, vol. 373, no. 9671, pp. 1275–1281, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. D. Hering, E. A. Lambert, P. Marusic et al., “Substantial reduction in single sympathetic nerve firing after renal denervation in patients with resistant hypertension,” Hypertension, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 457–464, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. F. Mahfoud, M. Schlaich, I. Kindermann et al., “Effect of renal sympathetic denervation on glucose metabolism in patients with resistant hypertension: A pilot study,” Circulation, vol. 123, no. 18, pp. 1940–1946, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. M. P. Schlaich, N. Straznicky, M. Grima et al., “Renal denervation: a potential new treatment modality for polycystic ovary syndrome?” Journal of Hypertension, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 991–996, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. A. Witkowski, A. Prejbisz, E. Florczak et al., “Effects of renal sympathetic denervation on blood pressure, sleep apnea course, and glycemic control in patients with resistant hypertension and sleep apnea,” Hypertension, vol. 58, no. 4, pp. 559–565, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2015 Alicia A. Thorp and Markus P. Schlaich. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.