Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Diabetes Research
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 1673081, 15 pages
Review Article

The Role of Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Function, and Autophagy in Diabetic Polyneuropathy

1Institute of Experimental and Clinical Therapeutics, Department of Physiology, University Health Sciences Centre, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico
2Department of Chemistry, University Centre for Exact and Engineering Sciences, University of Guadalajara, Guadalajara, JAL, Mexico

Correspondence should be addressed to Alejandra Guillermina Miranda-Díaz

Received 10 July 2017; Revised 25 August 2017; Accepted 12 September 2017; Published 24 October 2017

Academic Editor: Hao Wu

Copyright © 2017 Sonia Sifuentes-Franco et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) is the most frequent and prevalent chronic complication of diabetes mellitus (DM). The state of persistent hyperglycemia leads to an increase in the production of cytosolic and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and favors deregulation of the antioxidant defenses that are capable of activating diverse metabolic pathways which trigger the presence of nitro-oxidative stress (NOS) and endoplasmic reticulum stress. Hyperglycemia provokes the appearance of micro- and macrovascular complications and favors oxidative damage to the macromolecules (lipids, carbohydrates, and proteins) with an increase in products that damage the DNA. Hyperglycemia produces mitochondrial dysfunction with deregulation between mitochondrial fission/fusion and regulatory factors. Mitochondrial fission appears early in diabetic neuropathy with the ability to facilitate mitochondrial fragmentation. Autophagy is a catabolic process induced by oxidative stress that involves the formation of vesicles by the lysosomes. Autophagy protects cells from diverse stress factors and routine deterioration. Clarification of the mechanisms involved in the appearance of complications in DM will facilitate the selection of specific therapeutic options based on the mechanisms involved in the metabolic pathways affected. Nowadays, the antioxidant agents consumed exogenously form an adjuvant therapeutic alternative in chronic degenerative metabolic diseases, such as DM.

1. Introduction

Distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy is considered the most frequent diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN) and is the most prevalent chronic complication of diabetes mellitus (DM) [1]. It is possible that DPN is present in 10% of patients with an initial diagnosis of type 2 DM. In fact, emerging data suggest that DPN can occur before the development of hyperglycemia in the diabetic range in people with metabolic syndrome or altered tolerance to glucose [2]. The DPN can affect ~50% of patients with long-term DM [3]. The prevalence of DPN increases with age and history of the disease and is typically characterized by deficient control of glycemia [4]. The objective of the present review was to describe the mechanisms of functional and structural damage in DPN, the role and participation of oxidative stress, the oxidative stress of the endoplasmic reticulum, the behavior of the antioxidants, the effect on mitochondrial function, and autophagy in DPN.

2. Functional and Structural Damage to the Nervous Tissue in DPN

The potential mechanisms that lead to the damage of the nervous tissue in DPN include the activation of the different pathways: (a) the polyol pathway (glucose metabolism), (b) the deposit of end-products of advanced glycosylation, (c) the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, (d) the hexosamine pathway, and (e) the protein kinase C pathway. All these pathways are activated in the state of hyperglycemia (Figure 1). Each one of the pathways has the capacity to produce vascular insufficiency and oxidative stress [5]. The hyperglycemic state triggers the increase in the production of mitochondrial and cytoplasmic ROS, which, in conjunction with the deregulation of the antioxidant defenses, activates new pathways capable of producing oxidative damage in DPN [6, 7].

Figure 1: Interaction of hyperglycemia pathways with oxidative stress in DPN.

3. Oxidative Stress

Free radicals such as hydroxyl radical (HO•), nitric oxide (•NO), peroxynitrite (ONOO−), superoxide anion (O2•−), nitrogen dioxide (•NO2), peroxyl radicals (ROO•), and lipid peroxyl (LOO•) are highly reactive, unstable molecules that have an unpaired electron in their outer shell. ROS comprehends free radical and nonradical molecules. Nonradicals include hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), singlet oxygen (1O2), and lipid peroxide (LOOH), among others. H2O2 is a major ROS in cells and can diffuse long distances crossing membranes and causing cell damage at high concentrations by reacting with transition metals (copper, iron (Fe), and cobalt) yielding HO• via the Fenton reaction [8]:

ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) are formed during normal metabolic activity in a variety of biochemical reactions and cellular function. Their beneficial effects occur at low concentrations and involve physiological roles in cellular signaling systems. For example, H2O2 is produced in response to cytokines and growth factors and is involved in regulating immune cell activation and vascular remodeling in mammals [9]. NO• is generated in vivo by specific NO synthases (NOS) and the nitrate-nitrite-NO pathway and is a critical regulator of vascular homeostasis, neurotransmission, and host defense [10]. Excessive NO• production, under pathological conditions, leads to detrimental effects of this molecule on tissues, which can be attributed to its reaction with superoxide anion (O2•−) to form ONOO−. ONOO− is 1000 times more potent as an oxidizing compound than H2O2 [11].

The main sources of ROS are the mitochondrial electron transport chain and enzymatic reactions catalyzed by NOS, NADPH oxidases, xanthine oxidase, and hemeperoxidase enzymes, such as myeloperoxidase. The nonenzymatic production of O2•− occurs when a single electron is directly transferred to oxygen by reduced coenzymes or prosthetic groups (Flavin’s or iron sulfur clusters) or by xenobiotics previously reduced. Ubisemiquinone autoxidation (ubisemiquinone donates one electron to molecular oxygen yielding O2•− and ubiquinone) is the major source of O2•− in mitochondria, and because the ubiquinone or coenzyme Q pool faces both the intermembrane space and the mitochondrial matrix, O2•− is vectorially released into both compartments. O2•− released in the intermembrane space can cross the outer mitochondrial membrane into the cytosol through the porin protein. Furthermore, the mitochondrial electron transport chain contains several redox centers that may leak electrons to oxygen [12].

Under physiological conditions, the steady-state formation of ROS and RNS is normally balanced by a similar rate of consumption by antioxidants. Thus, oxidative stress results from the overproduction of ROS in the organism that exceeds the endogenous antioxidant capacity for them to be eliminated. The oxidative and nitrosative stress induced by hyperglycemia is considered one of the primary links between DM and diabetic complications [13]. The mechanism by which hyperglycemia leads to the generation of ROS is primarily due to autooxidation of the glucose and the glycosylation of proteins. The persistent increase in ROS and RNS favors the presence of oxidative and nitrosative stress, with the capacity to produce endothelial dysfunction, insulin resistance, and alterations in the number and functions of the pancreatic β-cells, favoring the appearance of micro- and macrovascular complications of DM [14]. The ROS and the RNS cause structural deterioration of the macromolecules (carbohydrates, proteins, lipids, and nucleic acids) causing loss of function [15]. Also, the ROS and the RNS are capable of activating cellular signaling cascades that lead to the transcription of genes that facilitate the development of diabetic complications. The nuclear factor-ĸB (NF-κB) is a nuclear transcription factor that can be activated by the increase in ROS, resulting in the transcription of proinflammatory proteins that aggravate the conditions of the illness. The chemokines and proinflammatory cytokines like the monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) of the macrophages, the tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), and the interleukins (interleukin-1β and interleukin-6) are implicated in the progression and complications of DM [16]. The increase in ROS and RNS, together with the significant reduction of the antioxidant defense mechanisms in the neurons, contributes to the clinical manifestations of DPN, which include the deterioration of nervous blood flow, endoneurial hypoxia, deterioration of the motor conduction and nerve sensation, degeneration of the peripheral nerves, sensorial loss, axonal atrophy of the large myelinated fibers, and characteristic neuropathic pain [17].

3.1. Oxidative Stress of the Endoplasmic Reticulum

The functions of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) include the protein synthesis and transport, protein folding, lipid biogenesis, maintenance of calcium homeostasis, and the participation of other crucial cellular functions [18]. The ER can control and maintain cellular homeostasis acting as a sensor for stressors in the intra- and extracellular medium, on providing a platform for the interaction between environmental signals and the basic biological cellular functions, and acting as an intersection to integrate multiple responses to stress [19]. The interruption of cellular homeostasis can lead to the gradual reduction in the function of a determinant organ on decreasing the capacity to respond to physiological stress. In fact, it has been suggested that the interruption in ER homeostasis is involved in the pathogenesis of DM and its complications [20]. Study of the behavior of the ER in DPN emerges as an interesting opportunity to investigate the functions of the ER and its signaling network in relation to DM, to develop possible therapeutic strategies [21]. The state of hyperglycemia has the ability to induce oxidative stress of the ER through the accumulation of unfolded or poorly folded proteins into the lumen. When oxidative stress is extreme, or of lengthy duration, the unfolded protein response can be overwhelming, unchaining diverse apoptotic processes including the factor 2 associated with the receptor of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and the kinase 1 regulator of the apoptosis signal through activation of the c-Jun N-terminal kinase [22, 23], liberation of calcium from the cytosol, depolarization of the mitochondrial membrane, and the liberation of cytochrome c [24], with excision of the procaspase 12 [25]. Other mechanisms that are altered include the perfusion of nerves [26], the C-peptide release [27], the appearance of dyslipidemia with an increase in the levels of circulating unsaturated fatty acids [28], a decrease in the levels of the glycolysis and intermediaries of the tricarboxylic acid cycle [29], and alterations of the redox state and calcium homeostasis [30]. Furthermore, alterations in the mitochondrial energy metabolism in the neurons of the dorsal root ganglia modulated by the heat shock protein 70 and the ciliary neurotrophic factor are produced [31, 32].

3.2. Oxidative Damage to Peripheral Nerves in DPN

The increase in ROS and RNS is capable of causing damage to the lipids present in the myelinated structures of the nerves, resulting in the loss of axons and interruption of the microvasculature in the peripheral nervous system [33]. The oxidative damage to the peripheral nerves causes hyperexcitability in the afferent nociceptors and the central neurons, causing the generation of spontaneous impulses in the axons and the dorsal root ganglia of the nerves, causing neuropathic pain [34].

3.3. Oxidative Damage to DNA in DPN

The oxidative stress that can be produced by the persistent hyperglycemic state in type 2 DM leads to modifications in the mitochondrial genetic material (mtDNA) and the nuclear DNA (nDNA) [35]. The persistence of oxidative damage to the mtDNA is capable of causing mutations in the mitochondrial genome, causing mitochondrial dysfunction that unchains an increase in ROS, forming a vicious cycle within the mitochondria, producing intense oxidative damage that can lead to cell death [3638]. The mitochondria are the primary source of the production of ROS and RNS and are the first organelles to suffer oxidative damage, putting the cells that are highly susceptible, like neurons, at risk while favoring the progression of DPN. The axons are highly susceptible to the metabolic and endothelial imbalances that lead to the progression of DPN because the axons normally contain a large number of mitochondria. Thus, oxidative damage favors mitochondrial damage of the DNA, mitochondrial dysfunction, and axonal degeneration [39]. On the other hand, H2O2 has the capacity to move into the cellular nucleus and subsequently the HO• is generated through the Fenton reaction. Then, the reaction of the HO• with the bases of the DNA strand, such as guanine, leads to the generation of radical adducts, then by one electron abstraction, the 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OH-dG) is formed. Other bases of DNA react with HO• in a similar manner; however, the 8-oxodG product is the most abundant and it is relatively easily formed and is promutagenic. In normal conditions, the 8-OHdG can be repaired by the endonuclease 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) enzyme through mechanisms of base excision [40]. However, experimental studies in animals and clinical studies have demonstrated that there are elevated levels of the 8-OHdG marker and deficiency of the DNA repair enzyme in patients with type 2 DM with DPN [41, 42]. The ROS induce activation of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP-1) that undertakes an important role in the repair of damaged DNA through a costly process of energy consumption that causes rapid depletion of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) with a concomitant decrease in ATP production [43]. Therefore, the control of oxidative damage to the DNA seems to be an important therapeutic target in patients with type 2 DM with DPN (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Hypothetical drawing of the effect of hyperglycemia on the increase of oxidative metabolism that induces damage to the mtDNA, which leads to mitochondrial dysfunction. The increase in the production of ROS augments damage to the nDNA with the generation of the product 8-OHdG and the decrease in repair of the DNA in DPN, which can ultimately cause axonal degeneration and cell death.

In neurons and other cell types, steady-state ATP production is necessary for ion homeostasis, particularly for impulse conduction, as maintenance and post-impulse restoration of the membrane potential are dependent on the activity of Na+/K+ ATPase. Therefore, ATP depletion elicits sodium to accumulate intracellularly and potassium to diffuse out of the cell causing cell swelling and dilation of the endoplasmic reticulum [44].

4. The DAMPs in Diabetes Mellitus

The damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) are intracellularly sequestered molecules involved in the pathogenesis of many human diseases. DAMPs are characterized by being hidden from recognition by the immune system under normal physiological conditions. However, under conditions of stress or cell injury, they may be actively secreted by stressed immune cells or by stress cells in which the neoantigens bind to natural immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies. DAMPs can be passively released into the extracellular environment of dying cells or when the extracellular matrix is damaged [45]. DAMPs are recognized by cells of the receptor recognition pattern (PRR) of the innate immune system, including macrophages, leukocytes, dendritic cells, vascular cells, fibroblasts, and epithelial cells for the purpose of promoting proinflammatory and profibrotic pathways [46]. PRRs include RIG-I-like receptors, NOD-like receptors, and Toll-like receptors (TLR) to activate intracellular signaling cascades resulting in the production of cytokines and immunomodulators released from immune cells [47]. In metabolic diseases such as DM, class V DAMPs play a crucial role. This class of DAMPs can be generated by intracellular stress even in nondying cells. This can occur due to minimal metabolic disturbances of homeostasis within the intra/extracellular microenvironment observed in type 2 DM, metabolic syndrome, and obesity. Primary ER disturbances elicit different classes of DAMPs which, through recognition by PRR cells, promote innate inflammation of immune tissue resulting in cell dysfunction. It is essential to consider that metabolism and innate immunity are linked since both systems involve the recognition of exogenous stressors. However, proper management leads to the maintenance of the individual homeostasis of each individual. Recent studies reveal molecular associations between immunity and metabolism because they could be substantial therapeutic targets for sterile inflammatory diseases such as type 2 DM [48]. Therefore, type 2 DM represents the prototype of an innate immune disease where sterile autoinflammatory processes induced by PRR cells trigger dysfunction of β-cells and favor cell death (pyroptosis) [49]. It is currently argued that metabolic insults such as insulin resistance, prolonged hyperglycemia, and increased free fatty acids (depletion of calcium levels in the ER) lead to excessive stimulation of insulin production by associated β-cells with the accumulation of proinsulin in the ER [50]. Proinsulin overload leads to alterations in ER homeostasis, resulting in accumulation of newly synthesized unfolded or misfolded proteins in the ER lumen that may be considered class V DAMPs [51]. Metabolic disturbances favor ER depletion associated with oxidative stress [52]. The intersection and crosstalk between the innate immune system, stress of ER, and the machinery of the inflammamosome seem to regulate the quality, intensity, and duration of innate proinflammatory and proapoptotic immune responses [53]. It is clear that further studies are required to determine whether the DAMP axis reflects an innate immune pathway that contributes to the pathogenesis of metabolic inflammatory diseases such as DM and its involvement in PND [54].

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) contains a higher frequency of hypomethylated cytosine-phosphate-guanine motifs which are natural ligands for PRR and, therefore, can be recognized by the innate immune system [55]. The mtDNA is highly sensitive to ROS-induced damage, and oxidative stress promoted the fragmentation of mtDNA. It has been shown that after induction of mitochondrial damage by oxidative stress, mtDNA fragments of low molecular weight were released to cytosol via the permeability transition pore [56]. Then, mtDNA fragments can serve as DAMPs when liberated into the extracellular space [57]. Interestingly, mtDNA that escapes from autophagy cell autonomously leads to TLR 9-mediated inflammatory responses. This mechanism might work in inflammation-related diseases such as diabetes mellitus. [58]. In fact, high levels of mtDNA have been reported in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in patients with type 2 diabetes [59] and diabetic retinopathy [60].

5. The Role of the Mitochondria in DPN

Mitochondria are the primary source of cellular oxidants, taking into account that about 2% of molecular oxygen is not completely reduced to water at the electron transport chain and, therefore, is the primary site for the potential overproduction of ROS and a prime target of cumulative oxidative damage. The mitochondria play a critical role in the regulation of the metabolic imbalance observed in DM, since both H2O2 and ONOO− can cross the mitochondrial membranes and damage macromolecules in other cellular regions [61]. An increase in the levels of O2•− in the mitochondrial electron transport chain as a result of the hyperglycemic state that favors the increase of oxidative stress has been reported [62]. Other metabolic pathways involved in ROS production, which augments the oxidative stress in DM, are the synthesis of metabolites through the xanthine oxidase pathway, the production of neurotransmitters, and the detoxification of the xenobiotics through the cytochrome P450 system and the NADPH oxidase [63].

Because diabetic cells exhibit high glucose content, excess of glucose-derived pyruvate is oxidized through the tricarboxylic acid cycle which causes higher levels of electron donors (NADH and FADH2) to the electron transport chain. This exceeds the capacity of the electron transport chain and blocks the electron transfer in the ubiquinol-cytochrome c reductase complex, causing the electrons to return to coenzyme Q. Thus, an increasing level of O2•− is observed. O2•− is a relatively small anion; in fact, the hydration shell of the superoxide anion is relatively small, with only four protons being strongly coupled to the unpaired electrons. The superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzyme degrades this oxygen-free radical to H2O2, which is then converted to H2O and O2 by other enzymes such as catalase and glutathione peroxidase [64] (Figure 3). H2O2 affects lipids and intramembranous proteins. It is a ROS whose biological actions are governed by its chemical reactivity towards biological targets, among which are metalloenzymes such as hemoperoxidases and amino acid residues sensitive to oxidants such as cysteine [65].

Figure 3: Formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species in mitochondria. The process is mediated by oxidative phosphorylation and the activity of the mitochondrial NO synthase: in physiological conditions the production of ROS and RNS are reduced by multiple steps that involved SOD, GPx and catalase. When the mitochondria suffers an insult the increase of the leakage of electrons to the matrix leads to an overload to the capacity of the enzymatic systems and leads to toxicity of the cell. Black arrows: vectors of reactions and products. Green arrows: the physiological pathway for formation of oxidative stress. Red arrows: leakage of electron to matrix. Dotted red and orange arrows: pathophysiological pathway for formation of ROS and RNS.

HO• is actively involved in lipid peroxidation and is associated with the genesis of harmful factors involved in many chronic degenerative diseases [66]. HO• can attack macromolecules (lipids, nucleic acids, and amino acids). Phenylalanine can be converted enzymatically into a physiological para-tyrosine. The attack of HO• on phenylalanine can produce para-tyrosine, meta-tyrosine, and ortho-tyrosine. The target and ortho-tyrosine are considered markers of HO•-induced damage. The use of resveratrol to treat patients with type 2 DM leads to decreased urinary excretion of ortho-tyrosine and concomitantly improves insulin signaling and sensitivity to this hormone [67]. Thus, the administration of resveratrol may be an attractive therapeutic tool along with strict metabolic control in patients with DM and chronic complications of DM.

6. Nitric Oxide

The production of •NO occurs from the L-arginine by the nitric oxide synthase (NOS) (Figure 3). The NOS has four isoforms: neuronal (nNOS), inducible (iNOS), endothelial (eNOS), and mitochondrial (mtNOS) [68]. The •NO is implicated in physiological processes like vasodilation, the modulation of nociception, the immune function, neurotransmission, and the excitation-contraction coupling [69]. The •NO is considered an atypical neurotransmitter and a second messenger in the nervous system [70] or as a hormone [71]. The majority of the effects of •NO are mediated through activation of the guanylate-cyclase enzyme that produces cyclic guanosine-3,5-monophosphate (cGMP) [29]. The •NO has pronociceptor properties in the neural crest and in the dorsal root ganglia that positively regulate as a result of cutaneous or visceral inflammation and by the peripheral lesions of the fibers. This effect could be potentiated or inhibited by the •NO donors [72].

O2•− interacts with •NO, forming the potent ONOO− that attacks several biomolecules, conditioning the production of a modified amino acid: nitrotyrosine [73]. Nitrotyrosine was initially considered a specific marker of ONOO− generation, but other pathways such as mieloperoxidase may also induce nitrosation of tyrosine. Nitrotyrosine is often described as a stable marker of oxidative/nitrosative stress [74]. Nitrosative stress-induced damage plays a crucial role in multiple interrelated aspects of the pathogenesis of DM and its complications. In the state of hyperglycemia, it stimulates the production of ONOO− capable of damaging the vascular endothelium and the peri-neuro in DPN [75]. Angiotensin II is also capable of inducing intraendothelial ONOO− production and activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) [76]. Angiotensin II is capable of inducing direct prooxidant effects on the vascular endothelium. The effects of angiotensin II are mediated in part by the formation of intraendothelial ROS through the family of nonphagocytic NAD(P)H oxidase subunits. ROS produced after angiotensin II-mediated stimulation have the ability to exert direct oxidative effects through pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinases, tyrosine kinases, and transcription factors that promote inflammation, hypertrophy, remodeling, and angiogenesis [77]. Inhibition of angiotensin II by the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) in vivo seems to reduce the formation of ONOO− [78]. Neutralization of RNS or inhibition of PARP activation pathways may emerge as a new approach, first as experimental therapy of DM, even for the prevention or reversal of complications caused by DM.

7. Mitochondrial Dysfunction in DPN

Mitochondria are the major sites of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis by the processes of oxidative phosphorylation. Mitochondria also mediate amino acid biosynthesis, fatty acid oxidation, steroid metabolism, calcium homeostasis, and ROS production and detoxification. Often, the mitochondria accumulate in the synapses and play a predominant role in synapse maintenance through attenuation of the Ca2+. A lot of neurons depend on the mitochondria, and so there is a strong link between neuronal dysfunction and mitochondrial dysfunction [79]. The indicators of mitochondrial dysfunction present in neurodegenerative illnesses include ultrastructural changes, inhibition of the respiratory chain, decrease in ATP production, an increase in the production of FR, deletions of the mtDNA, loss of calcium buffer effect, and loss of the mitochondrial membrane potential [80]. Mitochondria are dynamic bodies that constantly divide and fuse within the cell as the environment demands [81]. These processes can facilitate formation of new mitochondria, repair of defective mitochondrial DNA through mixing, and redistribution of mitochondria to sites requiring high-energy production [82]. Both processes effectively lower the percentage of defective mitochondria in the cell and ensure stability in cellular proliferation; indeed, metabolism, energy production, calcium signaling, reactive oxidative species production, apoptosis, and senescence all depend on the balance of fission and fusion. Conversely, dynamic distortion (i.e., excessive fragmentation/elongation) results in inefficiencies in cell functioning, if not cell death [83, 84]. Mitochondrial dynamics is a tightly regulated cellular process, with sophisticated molecular machinery involving GTPases. Fission is regulated by at least two proteins: a large GTPase, dynamin-like protein 1 (Drp1), and a small molecule, Fis1, and fusion involves three large mitochondrial transmembrane proteins localized to the outer membrane: mitofusin 1 (Mfn1), mitofusin 2 (Mfn2), and optic atrophy protein 1 [82, 85]. One model of mitochondrial fission suggests that the Drp1 is formed into rings or spirals that surround the external mitochondrial membrane with the help of hFis1 and other cofactors and regulators yet to be discovered. It is thought that GTP hydrolysis causes a conformational change in Drp1 that drives the fission event of the external mitochondrial membrane [86]. The excess of mitochondrial fission is an early and important event in neurodegenerative illnesses. The oxidative and nitrosative stress appear to play a predominant role as inductors of mitochondrial fission [87]. Several studies suggest that the damage to DNA and hyperglycemia can stimulate mitochondrial fission and indicate that the aberrant activation of components of the cellular cycle in postmitotic neurons plays an important role in the regulation of the mechanics of mitochondrial fission [88, 89]. Damage to the DNA is an event that can unchain mitochondrial fission, which can contribute to neuronal loss [90]. Mitochondrial fusion requires components of the external and internal membrane. Mfn1 and Mfn2 facilitate fusion of the external membrane in mammals, probably through transinteractions that promote the curvature and fusion of the membrane [91]. Some studies suggest that the GTPase is the principle mediator of fusion of the internal membrane and of the maintenance of the mtDNA in mammals. The mutations in the proteins of mitochondrial fusion give way to greater mitochondrial fragmentation, which could favor the appearance of neurodegenerative illnesses such as Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and Huntington’s diseases, among others [92, 93]. The dorsal root ganglion neurons (DRGs) exposed to hyperglycemia present with mitochondrial dysfunction, fragmented mitochondria, and an increase in the expression of Drp1 and oxidative stress [94]. Hyperglycemia stimulates an increase of the Drp1/Bax complexes, which mediate apoptotic mitochondrial fragmentation [95].

8. Autophagy

Autophagy is a catabolic process induced by oxidative stress that involves the delivery of cytoplasmic materials to the lysosome for degradation and component recycling. It is considered a protector of the cells against diverse factors of stress and routine wear and tear and is characterized by the sequestration of organelles/senescent or damaged proteins, forming autophagosomes to recycle those products [96]. Autophagy is involved in the elimination of cells that have suffered programmed cell death type 1 (classic) and in one form of nonapoptotic cell death or cell death type 2. Therefore, autophagy protects the cells on promoting cell death, depending on the state and cellular environment in which they are found [97]. The increase in ROS is essential for autophagy to prosper because in the presence of ROS it is possible to control the Atg4 activity, a family of cysteine proteases that are necessary for the formation of autophagosomes [98]. Autophagy can be inhibited by the regulator protein the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) [99]. Recently, it was reported that the activation of PARP-1 induced by the ROS promotes autophagy through the activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK), likely by suppression of the mTOR [43]. The deregulation of autophagy is related to pathologies like cancer, myopathies, neurodegenerative illnesses, heart diseases, liver diseases, gastrointestinal disturbances, and the complications of DM [100]. Autophagy can be categorized in three classes: macroautophagy, chaperone-mediated autophagy (CMA), and microautophagy [101]. The primary focus of the macroautophagy involves the formation of autophagosomes (double-membrane vesicles) in a multistep process. The autophagosomes combine with the liposomes and degrade the content through diverse acid hydrolases. This process is mediated by more than 30 autophagy-related proteins (Atg). Macroautophagy consists of two subsets: autophagy of specific organelles and selective macroautophagy. Although substantial progress has been made in the understanding of the complex mechanisms that regulate autophagy, many interactions involved in the control of the process have not yet been adequately described [102]. The ROS inhibit the activity of the mTOR signaling protein on invoking the dephosphorylation of the Atg13, the activation of the serine/threonine protein kinase ULK, and the recruitment of the focal adhesion kinase family-interacting protein of 200 kD (FIP200). The ULK-Atg13-FIP200 complex plays a critical role in the formation of autophagic double-membrane vacuoles in forming autophagosomes capable of disposing cellular waste. Microautophagy has been discussed little in chronic degenerative diseases [43].

8.1. Autophagy in DPN

Numerous metabolic and cellular alterations in neural tissue because of DM have been described, including the state of dyslipidemia, the excessive generation of ROS and RNS, and, obviously, the state of hyperglycemia [103]. These alterations cause mitochondrial and cytosolic oxidative stress with the generation of abnormal glycated proteins and dysfunctional mitochondrial proteins [104]. These alterations are a growing field of research which suggests that autophagy occurs as a cytoprotective response [105]. Autophagy in neural tissue has been described as a mechanism of cleansing that eliminates the damage caused by cellular stressors [106]. Mounting evidence shows that autophagy plays a potentially significant role in the pathophysiology of DPN, which requires additional research to completely understand the mechanisms that unchain the induction of autophagy in the nerves of diabetics and the relationship with neuronal injury during the natural history of DPN. Still pending to answer are numerous questions with regard to the relative contribution of the different stress factors in the process of autophagy and the cascade of interactions of autophagy with other cellular signals [66].

Rapamycin, an immunosuppressive drug that induces autophagy, has the ability to affect other aspects of cellular function, and it could be a focus of therapeutic interest in DM and its complications [107]. It has been reported that rapamycin improves tolerance to glucose in experimental animals fed with a diet rich in fats supplemented with branched chain amino acids, but not with high fat diets [108], which suggests the possible role of rapamycin or rapamycin-related compounds in type 2 DM [109]. Thus, the development of treatments that favor the cytoprotective effect of autophagy in the complications of DM is a potentially promising research path.

9. Management Alternatives in DPN

Currently, an absolute cure has not been defined for DPN or any other complications of DM, although some medications are conventionally useful. However, it is interesting to consider the pathophysiological links between hyperglycemia and oxidative stress. As well, the superior adjuvant effect of the antioxidants and FR scavengers continues to be essential in the prevention of DPN in diabetic patients.

9.1. Glycemia Control

Achieving control of stable glycemia is the only, most effective, and most difficult goal to achieve therapeutic target for the management of the complications of DM. According to reports from the follow-up study, “Diabetes Control and Complications and Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications” (EDIC), the intensive glycemic control designed to achieve nearly normal blood glucose levels, implemented early in the course of the diabetes, delays the development of DPN in patients with type 1 DM, without obtaining the same results in type 2 DM [110]. To date, an absolute cure for DN has not been defined. Although some drugs are conventionally used, some may be found in which some aspects of the pathophysiological links with oxidative stress are known.

9.2. Antioxidants

Antioxidants diminish or delay the oxidation of other molecules by inhibiting the initiation or propagation of oxidizing chain reactions, thus reducing its capacity to damage. Antioxidants may act as radical scavengers, peroxide decomposers, hydrogen donors, electron donors, singlet oxygen quenchers, enzyme inhibitors, or metal-chelating agents [111]. Their effect depends on concentration [112], polarity, and the medium [113], and also the presence of other antioxidants [114]. In fact, antioxidants may act from directly scavenging free radicals to increasing antioxidative defenses. There are several types of antioxidants in cells: dietary antioxidants (vitamins A, C, and E), endogenous antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione reductase (GPx), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and peroxiredoxins), and antioxidant molecules (glutathione (GSH), coenzyme Q, ferritin, bilirubin, uric acid, lipoic acid, melatonin, carotenoids, and flavonoids). Under physiological conditions, these molecules and enzymes work synergistically and together with each other to protect the cells [115]. The SOD dismutates the O2•− to form H2O2 upon which acts as the catalase or the GPx to produce water. The GST converts the reactive electrophilic species to form easily excretable hydrophilic products as a result of the conjugation with GSH. Vitamins C and E and the alpha-lipoic acid are involved in the elimination of the products of lipoperoxidation (LPO) [116]. As well, the flavonoids are capable of eliminating FR [117]. Some specialized proteins have regulator functions of the redox signaling with an antioxidant effect, like the peroxiredoxins (Pxr), thioredoxins (Trx), and glutaredoxins (Grx), with intracellular effects on the ROS and RNS [118]. The members of these families of proteins are ubiquitously expressed in all organisms, tissues, types of cells, and organelles. Some of these proteins can also move between cellular compartments and the extracellular space [119].

The stoichiometric number of antioxidants that capture FR by an antioxidant molecule and the effectiveness of FR scavenging can be evaluated by performing in vitro tests. The biological functions of antioxidants have been widely evaluated for their effects on the expression of antioxidant enzymes. For example, γ-tocopherol is a relatively mild ROS scavenger when compared to α-tocopherol. However, the oxidized product, γ-tocopheryl-quinone, reacts readily with the thiols to release the nuclear factor (Nrf-2) resulting in the expression of antioxidant enzymes such as hemooxygenase-1 [120].

There are several existing strategies with the use of different antioxidants to manage DPN. The choice of antioxidant depends on its chemical structure and concentration, the type of DPN, and stage of the illness, its severity, and the prevalence and primary causes from which it originated [121]. The antioxidants have different mechanisms and action sites through which they exert their biochemical effects and improve nerve dysfunction produced by oxidative stress in DPN.

9.3. Metformin

Metformin is a widely prescribed oral antidiabetic agent that reduces the production of hepatic glucose and improves peripheral sensitivity to insulin. The antihyperglycemic mechanisms of action of metformin include decrease of the absorption of glucose by the small intestine, increase in glucose uptake by the cells, decrease in concentrations of fatty acids free in plasma, and inhibition of gluconeogenesis through the activation of protein kinase activated by the AMP (AMPK). Other mechanisms of action of metformin are related to its antiatherosclerotic action, hypotensive and anticarcinogenic action, and its impact on the endothelial function in the veins. The pleiotropic actions of metformin include the impact on plasma lipid profiles, the decrease of oxidative stress, and the increase in the fibrinolytic activity in the plasma. Metformin is actively transported to the hepatocytes and the renal tubular epithelium by organic cation transporters 1 and 2 coded by the corresponding SLC22A1 and SLC22A2 genes, respectively. The transporter of the multi-antimicrobial extrusion protein 1 (MATE1) coded by the gene SLC47A1 facilitates the excretion of metformin through bile and urine [122]. It seems that metformin reduces the accumulation of autophagic vesicles and death of the pancreatic β-cells in patients with type 2 DM. These effects can be associated with the restored expression of the lysosome membrane-associated protein-2 [123]. Metformin is capable of inhibiting the mTOR pathway independently of the AMPK, and it promotes the generation of and elimination of autophagic vesicles [124].

9.4. Vitamins

The antioxidant vitamins A, C, and E are ingested with food and are capable of directly neutralizing and detoxifying FR and interacting with the recycling processes to create reduced forms of the vitamins [125]. The antioxidant vitamins have diverse biological activities in stimulating the immune system and preventing genetic changes through inhibiting the oxidative damage to DNA [126]. There is little information on the role of vitamin C in DPN, though there is evidence that it normalizes the concentration of sorbitol in blood and diminishes LPO and regenerates GSH in DM [127].

Vitamin E or tocopherols react with the OH• to form a stable phenolic radical that is reduced to a phenol by the ascorbate and the NADPH enzyme dependent on the reductase enzymes [70]. Vitamin E has a preventative effect in diabetic complications through the decrease in LPO, although without demonstrating significant improvement in symptomatology of the micro- and macrovascular complications despite reducing the markers of oxidative stress [128]. Vitamin E output is directed toward DPN because it has the ability to reduce neuropathic pain through modulating oxidative stress in the dorsal root ganglia [129]. Supplementation with vitamin E has been reported to significantly reduce blood glucose levels and glycated hemoglobin and has a neuroprotector effect in the myenteric nerves without affecting the intestinal area, the thickness of the intestinal wall, or muscular tone [130, 131].

L-Methylfolate, the active form of folic acid, is 7 times more bioavailable than folate and 3 times more effective in reducing homocysteine levels than folic acid [132]. Although the role of folic acid in vascular disease is not well established, active folate (5-methyltetrahydrofolate) can regenerate tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4). L-Methylfolate plays a role as an enzymatic cofactor for the conversion of the guanidinium nitrogen of L-arginine (L-Arg) to NO [133].

Benfotiamine is a synthetic lipid form of thiamine (B1) developed in Japan in the late 1950s to treat alcoholic neuropathy, sciatica, and other painful nerve conditions. Benfotiamine increases intracellular levels of thiamine di-phosphate (transketolase cofactor). This enzyme reduces AGE and LPO by directing its substrates to the pentose phosphate pathway. Reduction of AGE has been shown to contribute to the prevention of macro- and microvascular endothelial dysfunction in individuals with type 2 DM. Prospective cohort studies involving folic acid, benfotiamine, and its metabolites in PND patients will yield interesting results [134].

9.5. Flavonoids

The flavonoids are the largest and most important group of polyphenolic compounds. The flavonoids are widely distributed in plants, fruits, vegetables, grains, roots, stems, flowers, tea, and wine [135]. The antidiabetic properties of the flavonoids are primarily based on their effect on diverse molecular objectives and in the regulation of various pathways, like the reduction of apoptosis, improvement of proliferation of the pancreatic β-cells, promoting the secretion of insulin through regulation of glucose metabolism in hepatocytes on improving hyperglycemia, and decreasing insulin resistance, inflammation, and oxidative stress in adipocytes and skeletal myofibrils. They also favor the uptake of glucose by the skeletal muscle and adipose tissue [136]. Some subclasses of flavonoids can eliminate FR and chelate metals [137]. Taurine, acetyl-L-carnitine, and acetylcysteine have also reportedly demonstrated reducing the progression of DPN [15]. Polyphenols are potent antioxidants capable of contributing to the prevention of type 2 DM through its anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and immunomodulating properties. Citrus fruits contain polyphenols that have antioxidant and antidiabetic activity. Citrus polyphenols are mainly contained in the shell and have the ability to capture free radicals, in addition to antioxidant activity [138] (Figure 4).

Figure 4: We show the theoretical mechanism of how hyperglycemia favors the activation of several metabolic pathways that favor the production of ROS causing mitochondrial dysfunction. The beneficial action of antioxidants in the regeneration of antioxidant vitamins and the effect of flavonoids in the regulation of hyperglycemia.
9.6. Aldose Reductase Inhibitors

Inhibitors of aldose reductase in humans belong to the superfamily of aldo-keto-reductase proteins, characterized by catalyzing and limiting the polyol pathway of glucose metabolism by reducing glucose to sorbitol. Inhibitors of aldose reductase also reduce a wide range of aldehydes by detoxifying toxic lipids generated by oxidative stress by combining them with glutathione [139]. Accelerated flow of sorbitol through the polyol pathway has been implicated in the pathogenesis of secondary diabetic complications such as PND [140]. Previously, it was reported that the administration of albinase reductase inhibitors sorbinil or fidarestat in diabetic rats was able to correct depletion of glutathione and ascorbate induced by DM. At the same time, they are capable of correcting the negative regulation of SOD enzyme activity and the accumulation of LPO products in the peripheral nerves of the formation of O2•− vasa nervorum of the retina associated with oxidative and nitrosative stress with the ability to inhibit the accumulation of poly(ADP-ribose), a marker of PARP activation in the diabetic nerve and retina [141]. Although in experimental animals, aldose reductase inhibitors have demonstrated the potential inhibition of secondary diabetic complications, none of the aldose reductase inhibitors have been subjected to phase III clinical trials for the prevention of PND [142]. Recent studies suggest that increasing the polyol pathway could alter the NADPH/NADP ratio and attenuate GPx the GR by decreasing the reduced glutathione/oxidized glutathione which would cause oxidative stress [143]; it is interesting to explore the role of inhibition of aldose reductase in PND patients with a minimum follow-up of 5 years.

9.7. Free Radical Scavengers
9.7.1. Alpha-Lipoic Acid

Alpha-lipoic acid is a hydrophilic and lipophilic acid that can be synthesized by plants and animals where it is metabolized to dihydrolipoic acid when captured by the cells [144]. The alpha-lipoic acid and the dihydrolipoic acid are potent eliminators of FR and are involved in the regeneration of vitamins C and E and the GSH in the cell. Alpha-lipoic acid is also a cofactor for the production of diverse mitochondrial enzymes [145]. The ingestion of alpha-lipoic acid at a dose of 200–600 mg can provide up to 1000 times the quantity of available alpha-lipoic acid present in a regular diet. Preclinical and clinical data indicate that alpha-lipoic acid is safe and can be bioavailable in moderate doses. Gastrointestinal absorption of alpha-lipoic acid is variable and requires the consumption of food: its intake is recommended 30–60 min before food or 120 min after a meal [76]. It is rapidly absorbed and reaches maximum levels in the blood in 30–60 min, with a parenteral half-life of 30 min [146], and its consumption is considered safe in liver and kidney diseases [147]. One study done with alpha-lipoic acid over a four-year period reported that it is well tolerated in mild-moderate DPN and demonstrated significant clinical improvement and prevented the progression of the neuropathic disturbances without, at the end, impacting improvements in the neurophysiologic tests [148].

9.7.2. Resveratrol

Resveratrol is a stilbene compound and a phytoalexin. It is abundantly present in red wine, berries, red grapes, blueberries, peanuts, teasadori, hops, pistachios and grape juice, and cranberry. The antihyperglycemic effects of resveratrol appear to be the result of increased action of the glucose transporter on the cytoplasmic membrane. Neurons are extremely susceptible to damage induced by oxidative stress due to their high rate of oxygen consumption and low levels of antioxidant defense enzymes. The protective actions of resveratrol in DPN are attributed to its intrinsic FR scavenger properties. However, many other associated or separate mechanisms have recently been proposed such as the upregulation of Nrf2, SIRT1, and inhibition of the NF-κB transcriptional factor with a beneficial effect against nerve dysfunction [149]. Resveratrol emerges as an interesting management alternative to glycemic control in patients suffering from DPN.

10. In conclusion

The fundamental characteristic of patients with DPN is hyperglycemia with the capacity to unchain multiple and diverse processes among which are oxidative stress, RE oxidative stress, oxidative damage to DNA, mitochondrial dysfunction, alterations in the physiology of autophagy, the deregulation of endogenous antioxidants, and the variable effect of exogenous antioxidants in relation to metabolic control. Oxidative stress induced by hyperglycemia is mediated by several widely identified traditional signaling pathways, which at the same time are interesting therapeutic targets: (a) polyol, (b) hexosamine, (c) protein kinase C, (d) advanced glycosylation end-products, and (e) glycolysis. Management alternatives of these alterations emerge as interesting therapeutic targets in the study of the mechanisms of action at the molecular level as the FR scavengers and some nutrients with an antioxidant effect, always trying to correct the state of hyperglycemia.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to report.


  1. A. J. Boulton, A. I. Vinik, J. C. Arezzo et al., “Diabetic neuropathies: a statement by the American Diabetes Association,” Diabetes Care, vol. 28, pp. 956–962, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. G. Smith and J. R. Singleton, “Diabetic neuropathy,” CONTINUUM: Lifelong Learning in Neurology, vol. 18, pp. 60–84, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Peltier, S. A. Goutman, and B. C. Callaghan, “Painful diabetic neuropathy,” British Medical Journal, vol. 348, article g1799, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. A. I. Vinik, B. D. Mitchell, R. E. Maser, and R. Freeman, “Diabetic autonomic neuropathy,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, pp. 1553–1579, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. A. Ceriello, “New insights on oxidative stress and diabetic complications may lead to “casual” antioxidant therapy,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, pp. 1589–1596, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Brownlee, “The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism,” Diabetes, vol. 54, pp. 1615–1625, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. M. Vincent, J. W. Russell, P. Low, and E. L. Feldman, “Oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 25, pp. 612–628, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. Prousek, “Fenton chemistry in biology and medicine,” Pure and Applied Chemistry, vol. 79, no. 12, pp. 2325–2338, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. E. A. Veal, A. M. Day, and B. A. Morgan, “Hydrogen peroxide sensing and signaling,” Molecular Cell, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. O. Lundberg, E. Weitzberg, and M. T. Gladwin, “The nitrate-nitrite-nitric oxide pathway in physiology and therapeutics,” Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 156–167, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. Van Dyke, “The possible role of peroxynitrite in Alzheimer’s disease: a simple hypothesis that could be tested more thoroughly,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 48, pp. 375–380, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. F. Turrens, “Mitochondrial formation of reactive oxygen species,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 552, no. 2, pp. 335–344, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. R. Stavniichuk, H. Shevalye, S. Lupachyk et al., “Peroxynitrite and protein nitration in the pathogenesis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 669–678, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. de M Bandeira, L. J. da Fonseca, G. da S Guedes, L. A. Rabelo, M. O. Goulart, and S. M. Vasconcelos, “Oxidative stress as an underlying contributor in the development of chronic complications in diabetes mellitus,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 3265–3284, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. Negre-Salvayre, C. Coatrieux, C. Ingueneau, and R. Salvayre, “Advanced lipid peroxidation end products in oxidative damage to proteins. Potential role in diseases and therapeutic prospects for the inhibitors,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 153, no. 1, pp. 6–20, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. O. R. Ayepola, N. N. Chegou, N. L. Brooks, and O. O. Oguntibeju, “Kolaviron, a Garcinia biflavonoid complex ameliorates hyperglycemia-mediated hepatic injury in rats via suppression of inflammatory responses,” BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine, vol. 13, p. 363, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. G. Deli, E. Bosnyak, G. Pusch, S. Komoly, and G. Feher, “Diabetic neuropathies: diagnosis and management,” Neuroendocrinology, vol. 98, no. 4, pp. 267–280, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. H. Smith, H. L. Ploegh, and J. S. Weissman, “Road to ruin: targeting proteins for degradation in the endoplasmic reticulum,” Science, vol. 334, no. 6059, pp. 1086–1090, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. G. S. Hotamisligil, “Endoplasmic reticulum stress and the inflammatory basis of metabolic disease,” Cell, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 900–917, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. M. Balasubramanyam, L. P. Singh, and S. Rangasamy, “Molecular intricacies and the role of ER stress in diabetes,” Experimental Diabetes Research, vol. 2012, Article ID 958169, 2 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. O'Sullivan-Murphy and F. Urano, “ER stress as a trigger for β-cell dysfunction and autoimmunity in type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 780-781, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. D. O’Brien, L. M. Hinder, S. A. Sakowski, and E. L. Feldman, “ER stress in diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a new therapeutic target,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 621–633. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Urano, X. Wang, A. Bertolotti et al., “Coupling of stress in the ER to activation of JNK protein kinases by transmembrane protein kinase IRE1,” Science, vol. 287, pp. 664–666, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. J. M. Timmins, L. Ozcan, T. A. Seimon et al., “Calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II links ER stress with Fas and mitochondrial apoptosis pathways,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 119, pp. 2925–2941, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. T. Nakagawa, H. Zhu, N. Morishima et al., “Caspase-12 mediates endoplasmic-reticulum-specific apoptosis and cytotoxicity by amyloid-β,” Nature, vol. 403, pp. 98–103, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. A. Low, K. K. Nickander, and H. J. Tritschler, “The roles of oxidative stress and antioxidant treatment in experimental diabetic neuropathy,” Diabetes, vol. 46, 2 Supplement, pp. S38–S42, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. A. A. Sima, W. Zhang, and G. Grunberger, “Type 1 diabetic neuropathy and C-peptide,” Experimental Diabesity Research, vol. 5, pp. 65–77, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. L. M. Hinder, A. M. Vincent, J. M. Hayes, L. L. McLean, and E. L. Feldman, “Apolipoprotein E knockout as the basis for mouse models of dyslipidemia-induced neuropathy,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 239, pp. 102–110, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. L. M. Hinder, A. Vivekanandan-Giri, L. L. McLean, S. Pennathur, and E. L. Feldman, “Decreased glycolytic and tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates coincide with peripheral nervous system oxidative stress in a murine model of type 2 diabetes,” The Journal of Endocrinology, vol. 216, pp. 1–11, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. A. M. Vincent, B. C. Callaghan, A. L. Smith, and E. L. Feldman, “Diabetic neuropathy: cellular mechanisms as therapeutic targets,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 7, pp. 573–583, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. Ma, K. L. Farmer, P. Pan et al., “Heat shock protein 70 is necessary to improve mitochondrial bioenergetics and reverse diabetic sensory neuropathy following KU-32 therapy,” The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 348, pp. 281–292, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. A. Saleh, S. K. Roy-Chowdhury, D. R. Smith et al., “Ciliary neurotrophic factor activates NF-B to enhance mitochondrial bioenergetics and prevent neuropathy in sensory neurons of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rodents,” Neuropharmacology, vol. 65, pp. 65–73, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. A. Vinik, J. Ullal, H. K. Parson, and C. M. Casellini, “Diabetic neuropathies: clinical manifestations and current treatment options,” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 269–281, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. Kasznicki, M. Kosmalski, A. Sliwinska et al., “Evaluation of oxidative stress markers in pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 8669–8678, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. P. Fernyhough, T. J. Huang, and A. Verkhratsky, “Mechanism of mitochondrial dysfunction in diabetic sensory neuropathy,” Journal of the Peripheral Nervous System, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 227–235, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. S. B. Hollensworth, C. Shen, J. E. Sim, D. R. Spitz, G. L. Wilson, and S. P. LeDoux, “Glial cell type-specific responses to menadione-induced oxidative stress,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 28, no. 8, pp. 1161–1174, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. S. Srinivasan, M. Stevens, and J. W. Wiley, “Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: evidence for apoptosis associated mitochondrial dysfunction,” Diabetes, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 1932–1938, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. P. Ghafourifar, U. Schenk, S. D. Klein, and C. Richter, “Mitochondrial nitric-oxide synthase stimulation causes cytochrome c release from isolated mitochondria. Evidence for intramitochondrial peroxynitrite formation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, pp. 31185–31188, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. G. M. Leinninger, J. L. Edwards, M. J. Lipshaw, and E. L. Feldman, “Mechanisms of disease: mitochondria as new therapeutic targets in diabetic neuropathy,” Nature Clinical Practice Neurology, vol. 2, pp. 620–628, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. A. Banerjee, W. Yang, M. Karplus, and G. L. Verdine, “Structure of a repair enzyme interrogating undamaged DNA elucidates recognition of damaged DNA,” Nature, vol. 434, pp. 612–618, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. T. Nishikawa, T. Sasahara, S. Kiritoshi et al., “Evaluation of urinary 8-hydroxydeoxy-guanosine as a novel biomarker of macrovascular complications in type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1507–1512, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. Q. Y. Dong, Y. Cui, L. Chen, J. Song, and L. Sun, “Urinary 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine levels in diabetic retinopathy patients,” European Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 94–98, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  43. V. Burkart, Z. Q. Wang, J. Radons et al., “Mice lacking the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase gene are resistant to pancreatic beta-cell destruction and diabetes development induced by streptozocin,” Nature Medicine, vol. 5, pp. 314–319, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. M. Sajic, “Mitochondrial dynamics in peripheral neuropathies,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 601–620, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. W. G. Land, “Emerging role of innate immunity in organ transplantation part II: Potential of damage-associated molecular patterns to generate immunostimulatory dendritic cells,” Transplantation Reviews, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 73–87, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. M. Zhang and M. C. Carroll, “Natural IgM-mediated innate autoimmunity: A new target for early intervention of ischemia-reperfusion injury,” Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy, vol. 7, pp. 1575–1582, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. S. E. Weinberg, L. A. Sena, and N. S. Chandel, “Mitochondria in the regulation of innate and adaptive immunity,” Immunity, vol. 42, pp. 406–417, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. C. Cheng, L. A. Joosten, and M. G. Netea, “The interplay between central metabolism and innate immune responses,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 25, pp. 707–713, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. D. L. Eizirik, M. Miani, and A. K. Cardozo, “Signalling danger: endoplasmic reticulum stress and the unfolded protein response in pancreatic islet inflammation,” Diabetologia, vol. 56, pp. 234–241, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. W. G. Land, “The role of damage associated molecular patterns in human diseases: part I: promoting inflammation and immunity,” Sultan Qaboos University Medical Journal, vol. 15, pp. 9–12, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  51. C. M. Oslowski and F. Urano, “The binary switch that controls the life and death decisions of ER stressed β cells,” Current Opinion in Cell Biology, vol. 23, pp. 207–215, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. G. Landau, V. K. Kodali, J. D. Malhotra, and R. J. Kaufman, “Detection of oxidative damage in response to protein misfolding in the endoplasmic reticulum,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 526, pp. 231–235, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. F. Martinon and L. H. Glimcher, “Regulation of innate immunity by signaling pathways emerging from the endoplasmic reticulum,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 23, pp. 35–40, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. I. Tabas and D. Ron, “Integrating the mechanisms of apoptosis induced by endoplasmic reticulum stress,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 13, pp. 184–190, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. A. M. Krieg, “The role of CpG motifs in innate immunity,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 35–43, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. N. Garcia and E. Chavez, “Mitochondrial DNA fragments released through the permeability transition pore correspond to specific gene size,” Life Sciences, vol. 81, pp. 1160–1166, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. Q. Zhang, M. Raoof, Y. Chen et al., “Circulating mitochondrial DAMPs cause inflammatory responses to injury,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7285, pp. 104–107, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. T. Oka, S. Hikoso, O. Yamaguchi et al., “Mitochondrial DNA that escapes from autophagy causes inflammation and heart failure,” Nature, vol. 485, no. 7397, pp. 251–255, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. J. L. Fetterman, M. Holbrook, D. G. Westbrook et al., “Mitochondrial DNA damage and vascular function in patients with diabetes mellitus and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 53, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. A. N. Malik, C. K. Parsade, S. Ajaz et al., “Altered circulating mitochondrial DNA and increased inflammation in patients with diabetic retinopathy,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 110, pp. 257–265, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. L. I. Rachek, N. P. Thornley, V. I. Grishko, S. P. LeDoux, and G. L. Wilson, “Protection of INS-1 cells from free fatty acid-induced apoptosis by targeting hOGG1 to mitochondria,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 1022–1028, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. A. Ceriello and R. Testa, “Antioxidant anti-inflammatory treatment in type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 32, pp. S232–S236, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. J. S. Johansen, A. K. Harris, D. J. Rychly, and A. Ergul, “Oxidative stress and the use of antioxidants in diabetes: linking basic science to clinical practice,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 4, p. 5, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. S. S. Korshunov, V. P. Skulachev, and A. A. Starkov, “High protonic potential actuates a mechanism of production of reactive oxygen species in mitochondria,” FEBS Letters, vol. 416, no. 1, pp. 15–18, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. A. van der Vliet, “NADPH oxidases in lung biology and pathology: host defense enzymes, and more,” Free Radical Biology & Medicine, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 938–955, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. G. Asano, E. Takashi, T. Ishiwata et al., “Pathogenesis and protection of ischemia and reperfusion injury in myocardium!,” Journal of Nippon Medical School, vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 384–392, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. G. A. Molnár, E. Z. Mikolás, I. A. Szijártó, S. Kun, E. Sélley, and I. Wittmann, “Tyrosine isomers and hormonal signaling: a possible role for the hydroxyl free radical in insulin resistance,” World Journal of Diabetes, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 500–507, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. P. Ghafourifar and E. Cadenas, “Mitochondrial nitric oxide synthase,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 190–195, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. B. A. Kingwell, “Nitric oxide-mediated metabolic regulation during exercise: effect of training in health and cardiovascular disease,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 14, no. 12, pp. 1685–1696, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. H. Schulman, “Nitric oxide: a spatial second messenger,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 296–299, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. A. Ghasemi and S. Zahediasl, “Is nitric oxide a hormone?” Iranian Biomedical Journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 59–65, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  72. M. J. Millan, “The induction of pain: an integrative review,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 57, pp. 1–164, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. J. S. Beckman and W. H. Koppenol, “Nitric oxide, superoxide, and peroxynitrite: the good, the bad, and ugly,” The American Journal of Physiology, vol. 271, pp. 1424–1437, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  74. J. P. Eiserich, M. Hristova, C. E. Cross et al., “Formation of nitric oxide-derived inflammatory oxidants by myeloperoxidase in neutrophils,” Nature, vol. 391, pp. 393–397, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. L. J. Coppey, J. S. Gellett, E. P. Davidson, J. A. Dunlap, D. D. Lund, and M. A. Yorek, “Effect of antioxidant treatment of streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats on endoneurial blood flow, motor nerve conduction velocity, and vascular reactivity of epineurial arterioles of the sciatic nerve,” Diabetes, vol. 50, no. 8, pp. 1927–1937, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. M. J. Mihm, S. K. Wattanapitayakul, S. F. Piao, D. G. Hoyt, and J. A. Bauer, “Effects of angiotensin II on vascular endothelial cells: formation of receptor-mediated reactive nitrogen species,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 1189–1197, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. H. Cai, K. K. Griendling, and D. G. Harrison, “The vascular NAD(P)H oxidases as therapeutic targets in cardiovascular diseases,” Trends in Pharmacological Sciences, vol. 24, pp. 471–478, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. J. M. Forbes, M. E. Cooper, V. Thallas et al., “Reduction of the accumulation of advanced glycation end products by ACE inhibition in experimental diabetic nephropathy,” Diabetes, vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 3274–3282, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. S. Hoppins, L. Lackner, and J. Nunnari, “The machines that divide and fuse mitochondria,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 76, pp. 751–780, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. M. T. Lin and M. F. Beal, “Mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress in neurodegenerative diseases,” Nature, vol. 443, pp. 787–795, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. D. C. Chan, “Mitochondria: dynamic organelles in disease, aging, and development,” Cell, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 1241–1252, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. A. B. Knott, G. Perkins, R. Schwarzenbacher, and E. Bossy-Wetzel, “Mitochondrial fragmentation in neurodegeneration,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 505–518, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. P. A. Parone, S. Da Cruz, D. Tondera et al., “Preventing mitochondrial fission impairs mitochondrial function and leads to loss of mitochondrial DNA,” PLoS One, vol. 3, no. 9, article e3257, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. X. Wang, B. Su, H. G. Lee et al., “Impaired balance of mitochondrial fission and fusion in Alzheimer’s disease,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 28, pp. 9090–9103, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. E. Smirnova, L. Griparic, D. L. Shurland, and A. M. van der Bliek, “Dynamin-related protein Drp1 is required for mitochondrial division in mammalian cells,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 12, no. 8, pp. 2245–2256, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. E. Ingerman, E. M. Perkins, M. Marino et al., “Dnm1 forms spirals that are structurally tailored to fit mitochondria,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 170, no. 7, pp. 1021–1207, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. S. Nakagomi, M. J. Barsoum, E. Bossy-Wetzel, C. Sütterlin, V. Malhotra, and S. A. Lipton, “A Golgi fragmentation pathway in neurodegeneration,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 221–231, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. A. Jahani-Asl, E. C. Cheung, and M. Neuspiel, “Mitofusin 2 protects cerebellar granule neurons against injury-induced cell death,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, pp. 23788–23798, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. T. Yu, J. L. Robotham, and Y. Yoon, “Increased production of reactive oxygen species in hyperglycemic conditions requires dynamic change of mitochondrial morphology,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 103, pp. 2653–2658, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. L. McGahan, A. M. Hakim, and G. S. Robertson, “Hippocampal Myc and p53 expression following transient global ischemia,” Brain Research Molecular Brain Research, vol. 56, pp. 133–145, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. N. Ishihara, Y. Eura, and K. Mihara, “Mitofusin 1 and 2 play distinct roles in mitochondrial fusion reactions via GTPase activity,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 117, pp. 6535–6546, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. A. Olichon, L. Baricault, N. Gas et al., “Loss of OPA1 perturbates the mitochondrial inner membrane structure and integrity, leading to cytochrome c release and apoptosis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, pp. 7743–7746, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. S. Meeusen, R. DeVay, J. Block et al., “Mitochondrial inner-membrane fusion and crista maintenance requires the dynamin-related GTPase Mgm1,” Cell, vol. 127, pp. 383–395, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. G. M. Leinninger, C. Backus, A. M. Sastry, Y. B. Yi, C. W. Wang, and E. L. Feldman, “Mitochondria in DRG neurons undergo hyperglycemic mediated injury through Bim, Bax and the fission protein Drp1,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 23, pp. 11–22, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. M. Karbowski, Y. J. Lee, B. Gaume et al., “Spatial and temporal association of Bax with mitochondrial fission sites, Drp1, and Mfn2 during apoptosis,” The Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 159, pp. 931–938, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. B. Levine and G. Kroemer, “Autophagy in the pathogenesis of disease,” Cell, vol. 132, pp. 27–42, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. J. O. Pyo, M. H. Jang, Y. K. Kwon et al., “Essential roles of atg5 and FADD in autophagic cell death: dissection of autophagic cell death into vacuole formation and cell death,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, pp. 20722–20729, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. R. Scherz-Shouval, E. Shvets, E. Fass, H. Shorer, L. Gil, and Z. Elazar, “Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 26, pp. 1749–1760, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. Q. Huang, Y. T. Wu, H. L. Tan, C. N. Ong, and H. M. Shen, “A novel function of poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase-1 in modulation of autophagy and necrosis under oxidative stress,” Cell Death and Differentiation, vol. 16, pp. 264–277, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. Y. Chen and D. J. Klionsky, “The regulation of autophagy – unanswered questions,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. N. Rodríguez-Muela, H. Koga, L. García-Ledo et al., “Balance between autophagic pathways preserves retinal homeostasis,” Aging Cell, vol. 12, pp. 478–448, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. C. De Duve and R. Wattiaux, “Functions of lysosomes,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 28, pp. 435–492, 1966. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. T. Askwith, W. Zeng, M. C. Effo, and M. J. Stevens, “Oxidative stress and dysregulation of the taurine transporter in high-glucose-exposed human Schwann cells: implications for pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy,” American Journal of Physiology. Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 297, pp. 620–628, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  104. I. G. Obrosova, “Diabetes and the peripheral nerve,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1792, pp. 931–940, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  105. N. Mizushima, B. Levine, A. M. Cuervo, and D. J. Klionsky, “Autophagy fights disease through cellular self-digestion,” Nature, vol. 451, pp. 1069–1075, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. M. Martinez-Vicente and A. M. Cuervo, “Autophagy and neurodegeneration: when the cleaning crew goes on strike,” Lancet Neurology, vol. 6, pp. 352–361, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. A. M. Shapiro, J. R. Lakey, E. A. Ryan et al., “Islet transplantation in seven patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus using a glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 343, pp. 230–238, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. C. B. Newgard, J. An, J. R. Bain et al., “A branched-chain amino acid-related metabolic signature that differentiates obese and lean humans and contributes to insulin resistance,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 9, pp. 311–326, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  109. W. Martinet, S. Verheye, and G. R. De Meyer, “Everolimus-induced mTOR inhibition selectively depletes macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques by autophagy,” Autophagy, vol. 3, pp. 241–244, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  110. J. W. Albers, W. H. Herman, R. Pop-Busui et al., “Effect of prior intensive insulin treatment during the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) on peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes during the Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (EDIC) study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, pp. 1090–1096, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  111. B. Frie, R. Stocker, and B. N. Ames, “Antioxidant defences and lipid peroxidation in human blood plasma,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 37, pp. 569–571, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  112. E. N. Frankel, S. W. Huang, E. Prior, and R. Aeschbach, “Evaluation of antioxidant activity of rosemary extracts, carnosol and carnosic acid in bulk vegetable oils and fish oils and their emulsions,” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, vol. 72, pp. 201–208, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  113. U. Samotyja and M. Malecka, “Effects of blackcurrant seeds and rosemary extracts on oxidative stability of bulk and emulsified lipid substrates,” Food Chemistry, vol. 104, pp. 317–323, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  114. E. A. Decker Antioxidant mechanisms, Food Lipids, M. D. B. AkohCC, Ed., Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, 2nd edition, 2002.
  115. B. Marengo, N. Nitti, A. L. Furfaro et al., “Redox homeostasis and cellular antioxidant systems: crucial players in cancer growth and therapy,” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, vol. 2016, Article ID 6235641, 16 pages, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. M. Valko, D. Leibfritz, J. Moncol, M. T. Cronin, M. Mazur, and J. Telser, “Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease,” The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 44–84, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  117. A. Sathya and P. Siddhuraj, “Role of phenolics as antioxidants, biomolecule protectors and as anti-diabetic factors—evaluation on bark and empty pods of Acacia auriculiformis,” Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 757–765, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  118. C. H. Lillig, C. Berndt, and A. Holmgren, “Glutaredoxin systems,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects, vol. 1780, pp. 1304–1317, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  119. I. Rahman, S. K. Biswas, and A. Kode, “Oxidant and antioxidant balance in the airways and airway diseases,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 533, no. 1-3, pp. 222–239, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  120. Y. Ogawa, Y. Saito, K. Nishio, Y. Yoshida, H. Ashida, and E. Niki, “γ-Tocopheryl quinone, not α-tocopheryl quinone, induces adaptive response through up-regulation of cellular glutathione and cysteine availability via activation of ATF4,” Free Radical Research, vol. 42, pp. 674–687, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  121. A. B. Oyenihi, A. O. Ayeleso, E. Mukwevho, and B. Masola, “Antioxidant strategies in the management of diabetic neuropathy,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2015, Article ID 515042, 15 pages, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  122. M. Grzybowska, J. Bober, and M. Olszewska, “Metformin - mechanisms of action and use for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Postȩpy Higieny i Medycyny Doświadczalnej (Online), vol. 65, pp. 277–285, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  123. M. Masini, R. Bugliani, S. Lupi et al., “Autophagy in human type 2 diabetes pancreatic beta cells,” Diabetologia, vol. 52, pp. 1083–1086, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  124. A. Kalender, A. Selvaraj, S. Y. Kim et al., “Metformin, independent of AMPK, inhibits mTORC1 in a rag GTPase-dependent manner,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 11, pp. 390–401, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. A. C. Maritim, R. A. Sanders, and J. B. Watkins 3rd, “Diabetes, oxidative stress, and antioxidants: a review,” Journal of Biochemical and Molecular Toxicology, vol. 17, pp. 24–38, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  126. J. S. Lewis, N. V. Dolgova, Y. Zhang et al., “A combination dual-sized microparticle system modulates dendritic cells and prevents type 1 diabetes in prediabetic NOD mice,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 160, no. 1, pp. 90–102, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  127. Z. Mazloom, N. Hejazi, M. H. Dabbaghmanesh, H. R. Tabatabaei, A. Ahmadi, and H. Ansar, “Effect of vitamin C supplementation on postprandial oxidative stress and lipid profile in type 2 diabetic patients,” Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 14, no. 19, pp. 900–904, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  128. I. M. Lee, N. R. Cook, J. M. Gaziano et al., “Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: the women’s health study: a randomized controlled trial,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 294, no. 1, pp. 56–65, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  129. S. Wang, L. Zhang, G. Lim et al., “A combined effect of dextromethorphan and melatonin on neuropathic pain behavior in rats,” Brain Research, vol. 1288, pp. 42–49, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  130. M. Naziroğlu, M. Simşek, H. Simşek, N. Aydilek, Z. Ozcan, and R. Atilgan R., “The effects of hormone replacement therapy combined with vitamins C and E on antioxidants levels and lipid profiles in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 344, no. 1-2, pp. 63–71, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  131. L. P. Roldi, R. V. Pereira, E. A. Tronchini et al., “Vitamin E (α-tocopherol) supplementation in diabetic rats: effects on the proximal colon,” BMC Gastroenterology, vol. 9, p. 88, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  132. J. V. Boykin, “Ischemic vascular disease, nitric oxide deficiency, and impaired wound healing,” Vascular Disease Management, vol. 3, pp. 2–11, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  133. P. F. Jacques, A. G. Bostom, R. R. Williams et al., “Relation between folate status, a common mutation in methylene-tetrahydrofolate reductase, and plasma homocysteine concentrations,” Circulation, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 7–9, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  134. A. Stirban, M. Negrean, B. Stratmann et al., “Benfotiamine prevents macro- and microvascular endothelial dysfunction and oxidative stress following a meal rich in advanced glycation end products in individuals with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2064–2071, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  135. C. H. Leo and O. L. Woodman, “Flavonols in the prevention of diabetes-induced vascular dysfunction,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 532–544, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  136. B. A. Graf, P. E. Milbury, and J. B. Blumberg, “Flavonols, flavones, flavanones, and human health: epidemiological evidence,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 8, pp. 281–290, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  137. R. J. Nijveldt, E. van Nood, D. E. van Hoorn, P. G. Boelens, K. van Norren, and P. A. van Leeuwen, “Flavonoids: a review of probable mechanisms of action and potential applications,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 74, no. 4, pp. 418–425, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  138. A. Hirata, Y. Murakami, M. Shoji, Y. Kadoma, and S. Fujisawa, “Kinetics of radical-scavenging activity of hesperetin and hesperidin and their inhibitory activity on COX-2 expression,” Anticancer Research, vol. 25, pp. 3367–3374, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  139. S. Srivastava, A. Chandra, A. Bhatnagar, S. K. Srivastava, and N. H. Ansari, “Lipid peroxidation product, 4-hydroxynonenal and its conjugate with GSH are excellent substrates of bovine lens aldose reductase,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 217, pp. 741–746, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  140. P. J. Oates, “Aldose reductase, still a compelling target for diabetic neuropathy,” Current Drug Targets, vol. 9, pp. 14–36, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  141. I. G. Obrosova, P. Pacher, C. Szabo et al., “Aldose reductase inhibition counteracts oxidative-nitrosative stress and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase activation in tissue sites for diabetes complications,” Diabetes, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 234–242, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. S. Suzen and E. Buyukbingol, “Recent studies of aldose reductase enzyme inhibition for diabetic complications,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 10, pp. 1329–1352, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  143. S. K. Srivastava, K. V. Ramana, and A. Bhatnagar, “Role of aldose reductase and oxidative damage in diabetes and the consequent potential for therapeutic options,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 26, pp. 380–392, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  144. N. Vallianou, A. Evangelopoulos, and P. Koutalas, “Alpha-lipoic acid and diabetic neuropathy,” The Review of Diabetic Studies, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 230–236, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  145. L. Packer, K. Kraemer, and G. Rimbach, “Molecular aspects of lipoic acid in the prevention of diabetes complications,” Nutrition, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 888–895, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  146. K. Breithaupt-Grogler, G. Niebch, E. Schneider et al., “Dose-proportionality of oral thioctic acid-coincidence of assessments via pooled plasma and individual data,” European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, vol. 8, pp. 57–65, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  147. Z. X. Poh and K. P. Goh, “A current update on the use of alpha lipoic acid in the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Endocrine, Metabolic & Immune Disorders Drug Targets, vol. 9, pp. 392–398, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  148. D. Ziegler, P. A. Low, W. J. Litchy et al., “Efficacy and safety of antioxidant treatment with α-lipoic acid over 4 years in diabetic polyneuropathy: the NATHAN 1 trial,” Diabetes Care, vol. 34, no. 9, pp. 2054–2060, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. A. Kumar, G. Negi, and S. S. Sharma, “Neuroprotection of resveratrol in diabetic neuropathy: concepts and mechanisms,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 20, no. 36, pp. 4640–4645, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus