Relationships of Insulin Action to Age, Gender, Body Mass Index, and Waist Circumference Present Diversely in Different Glycemic Statuses among Chinese Population
Table 1
Demographics and clinical characteristics of the participants by glycemic status.
Overall ()
Previously diagnosed ()
Newly diagnosed ()
IFG ()
NFG ()
value
Age (years)
56.2 (56.1–56.4)
60.1 (59.8–60.4)a,b,c
57.0 (56.6–57.4)a
57.0 (56.7–57.3)a
54.8 (54.6–55.1)
<0.001
Gender, (male, %)
49.4 (49.0–49.8)
46.9 (46.7–47.1)a,b,c
51.1 (50.9–51.3)a
49.4 (49.1–49.6)
49.6 (49.4–49.8)
<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)
24.8 (24.8-24.8)
25.7 (25.6–25.8)a
25.6 (25.5–25.8)a
25.6 (25.5–25.7)a
24.1 (24.0-24.1)
<0.001
WC (cm)
84.8 (84.7–84.9)
88.2 (87.9–88.5)a,b
87.6 (87.3–88.0)a,b
86.9 (86.7–87.2)a
82.6 (82.4–82.7)
<0.001
WHtR
0.53 (0.53-0.53)
0.55 (0.54-0.55)a
0.54 (0.54-0.55)a
0.54 (0.54-0.54)a
0.52 (0.51-0.52)
<0.001
SBP (mmHg)
137.6 (137.4–137.8)
142.9 (142.3–143.6)a,b
141.9 (141.3–142.6)a
141.1 (140.6–141.6)a
134.0 (133.7–134.3)
<0.001
DBP (mmHg)
80.0 (79.9–80.1)
80.5 (80.2–80.8)a,b,c
82.2 (81.8–82.5)a
81.7 (81.4–82.0)a
78.7 (78.6–78.9)
<0.001
TC (mmol/L)
4.9 (4.9-4.9)
4.9 (4.9-5.0)a,b,c
5.1 (5.1-5.2)a,b
5.0 (5.0-5.1)a
4.8 (4.8-4.8)
<0.001
TG (mmol/L)
1.8 (1.7-1.8)
2.0 (2.0-2.0)a,c
2.3 (2.2-2.3)a,b
2.0 (1.9-2.0)a
1.5 (1.5-1.5)
<0.001
LDL (mmol/L)
3.1 (3.1-3.1)
3.1 (3.1-3.2)a,b,c
3.2 (3.2-3.3)a
3.2 (3.2-3.2)a
3.0 (3.0-3.0)
<0.001
HDL (mmol/L)
1.3 (1.2-1.3)
1.2 (1.2-1.2)a,b,c
1.2 (1.2-1.2)a,b
1.2 (1.2-1.3)a
1.3 (1.3-1.3)
<0.001
FPG (mmol/L)
6.3 (6.2-6.3)
8.4 (8.3-8.4)a,b,c
9.1 (9.0-9.1)a,b
6.4 (6.4-6.4)a
5.1 (5.1-5.1)
<0.001
HbA1c (%)
5.5 (5.4-5.5)
6.8 (6.7-6.8)a,b
6.7 (6.7-6.8)a,b
5.5 (5.5-5.5)a
4.9 (4.8-4.9)
<0.001
HbA1c (mmol/mol)
36.1 (35.9–36.2)
50.6 (50.0–51.2)
50.0 (49.4–50.7)
36.5 (36.4–36.7)
29.4 (29.3–29.5)
Insulin
2.1 (2.0-2.1)
2.1 (2.1-2.2)a,b,c
2.5 (2.4-2.5)a,b
2.3 (2.3-2.3)a
1.9 (1.8-1.9)
<0.001
HOMA-IR
0.7 (0.7-0.8)
1.1 (1.1-1.1)a,b,c
1.5 (1.5-1.5)a,b
1.0 (1.0-1.0)a
0.4 (0.1–0.4)
<0.001
Mean values (95% confidence interval) or percentages (95% confidence interval) were shown. IFG: impaired fasting glucose; NFG: normal fasting glucose. Insulin and HOMA-IR values were logarithmically transformed. compared with NFG; compared with IFG; compared with newly diagnosed.