Journal of Diabetes Research

Journal of Diabetes Research / 2021 / Article
Special Issue

Diabetes Mellitus and its Cardiovascular Complications: New Insights into an Old Disease 2021

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 4461311 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4461311

Haipeng Yao, Zhen Sun, Guangyao Zang, Lili Zhang, Lina Hou, Chen Shao, Zhongqun Wang, "Epidemiological Research Advances in Vascular Calcification in Diabetes", Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2021, Article ID 4461311, 15 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/4461311

Epidemiological Research Advances in Vascular Calcification in Diabetes

Academic Editor: Gaetano Santulli
Received12 May 2021
Revised27 Aug 2021
Accepted11 Sep 2021
Published01 Oct 2021

Abstract

Vascular calcification is the transformation of arterial wall mesenchymal cells, particularly smooth muscle cells (SMCs), into osteoblast phenotypes by various pathological factors. Additionally, vascular transformation mediates the abnormal deposition of calcium salts in the vascular wall, such as intimal and media calcification. Various pathological types have been described, such as calcification and valve calcification. The incidence of vascular calcification in patients with diabetes is much higher than that in nondiabetic patients, representing a critical cause of cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes. Because basic research on the clinical transformation of vascular calcification has yet to be conducted, this study systematically expounds on the risk factors for vascular calcification, vascular bed differences, sex differences, ethnic differences, diagnosis, severity assessments, and treatments to facilitate the identification of a new entry point for basic research and subsequent clinical transformation regarding vascular calcification and corresponding clinical evaluation strategies.

1. Introduction

The global prevalence of diabetes is currently rapidly increasing. According to data released by the International Diabetes Federation (IDF), in 2019, 463 million adults aged 20–79 years worldwide had diabetes (9.3% of all adults in this age group). By 2030, estimates indicate that 578.4 million people will have diabetes; by 2045, 702 million adults are expected to have diabetes. Vascular calcification is a common complication in patients with diabetes and a critical cause of cardiovascular disease and death. However, the mechanism underlying vascular calcification in patients with diabetes remains unclear. In recent years, vascular calcification was identified as a complex, active, and highly adjustable pathophysiological process mediated by various cells. Vascular calcification is characterized by the transformation of vascular cells from their original contractile phenotype into an osteoblast-like phenotype following stimulation with various factors [1, 2]. Vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) are the primary cells responsible for vascular calcification. The degradation products of smooth muscle cells after apoptosis or necrosis (apoptotic bodies and stromal vesicles, respectively) are involved in the initiation of VSMC calcification [2]. When vascular smooth muscle cells are exposed to stimuli, such as oxidative stress and high-glucose levels, they differentiate into osteoblast-like cells and secrete large amounts of bone-related proteins. Examples include alkaline phosphatase (ALP), core-binding factor a1 (Cbfa1), osteocalcin (OCN), type I collagen (Col I), and bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2). These proteins facilitate the deposition of calcium phosphate in the extracellular matrix and the occurrence of vascular calcification [36]. Additionally, many dynamic changes also trigger or promote vascular calcification. For example, matrix Gla protein (MGP), inorganic pyrophosphate, osteoprotegerin, osteopontin (OPN), fetuin A (FA), and other vascular calcification inhibitors are lost, or high blood sugar levels, reactive oxygen species (ROS), inflammatory cytokines, G protein-coupled receptors- (GPCR-) β 2-Ar signaling pathway, AGE and its receptors (RAGE), which constitute the AGE/RAGE signaling pathway, and other cartilage factors are induced or enhanced [711]. Although these factors explain the pathogenesis of vascular calcification from several different aspects, many links between basic science and clinical transformation have not been elucidated. This study systematically discusses the clinical aspects of vascular calcification risk factors, vascular bed differences, sex differences, and ethnic differences, along with the diagnosis, severity assessments, and treatment options to identify a new entry point for the basic and clinical transformation of vascular calcification and corresponding clinical evaluation strategies.

2. Risk Factors for Vascular Calcification in Patients with Diabetes

2.1. High Blood Sugar Levels

In recent years, many studies have investigated the mechanism by which hyperglycemia promotes vascular calcification. VSMCs cultured under high-glucose conditions express RUNX2, BMP-2, and OCN at high levels and exhibit enhanced matrix calcification [12]. In a study using mice [13], high glucose promoted the transformation of mouse VSMCs into osteoblasts with high expression of decorin (DCN). DCN is an essential component of the extracellular mechanism. Exogenous DCN inhibits the activity of extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes and collagen degradation while increasing matrix deposition and calcification. Similarly, in vitro studies have found that high-glucose levels induce the calcification of VSMCs [5]. When vascular smooth muscle cells undergo oxidative stress following exposure to high-glucose levels and other stimulating factors, they differentiate into osteoblast-like cells and secrete large amounts of bone-related proteins. Kawakami and colleagues [14] found that the S100 family is closely related to vascular calcification. Hyperglycemia promotes increased S100A9 secretion and increased expression of RAGE protein receptors. In a high-glucose environment, proinflammatory macrophages release calcified extracellular vesicles (EVs), which form atherosclerotic microcalcifications through the S100A9-RAGE axis [15]. High-glucose-dependent mitochondrial superoxide production becomes excessive, leading to NF-κB activation [16], and NF-κB induces S100A9 expression. The interaction of S100A9 and RAGE activates the NF-κB pathway, resulting in a positive feedback loop. S100A9 induces the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines through mechanisms such as ROS generation and activation of ROS-sensitive transcription factors (NF-κB). Hyperglycemia also promotes increased expression of BMP-2/4 proteins. In patients with diabetes, BMP-2/4 expression in the aorta increases [17]. The protein induces the osteogenic differentiation of VSMCs, leading to cellular calcification.

2.2. Lipid Metabolism Disorder

A high-fat diet can lead to obesity, high blood pressure, diabetes, and vascular calcification. In the high-glucose state of diabetes, oxidized low-density lipoprotein further promotes atherosclerosis and calcification of the vascular media. Previous studies have suggested that HDL cholesterol exerts an antiarteriosclerotic effect, and related in vitro cell-based experiments have shown that HDL cholesterol lacking oxidative modifications inhibits vascular calcification [18]. Decreased HDL cholesterol levels are often accompanied by increased leptin levels in blood circulation. Increased leptin levels upregulate the BMP osteogenic signaling pathway, stimulate the differentiation of VSMCs into osteoblasts, and mediate the formation of vascular calcification [19]. Proudfoot and colleagues [20] found that when dyslipidemia occurred, acetylated low-density lipoprotein (LDL) increased the osteogenic phenotype of VSMCs by 3-fold. Thus, LDL induces VSMC differentiation and increases ALP activity. In contrast, HDL inhibits the osteogenic differentiation pathway [21]. Additionally, hypercholesterolemia increases oxidative stress and accelerates VD-induced vascular calcification [22]. Bjornstad and colleagues [23] found that triglycerides independently predict the progression of coronary artery calcification (CAC) in patients with diabetes. Some studies have found that hyperlipidemia is related to Wnt/β-catenin signaling, which plays a vital role in vascular calcification [24].

2.3. Insulin Abnormalities

Insulin exerts a protective effect on arterial vascular calcification. Numerous studies have shown that NO inhibits platelet activation and limits the migration and proliferation of VSMCs [25]. Insulin stimulates the vascular endothelium to release NO that subsequently oxidizes lipoproteins, thereby reducing the rate of intimal calcification and inhibiting the formation of VSMCs [26]. When insulin resistance (IR) occurs, more free fatty acids enter the liver, and the body compensates by increasing the hepatic absorption of triglycerides and the production and secretion of VLDL; thus, the risk of vascular calcification also increases. As shown in the study by Iguchi and colleagues, patients with higher levels of IR are more likely to develop thin cap fibrous atherosclerosis (TCFA), and the cap is significantly thinner [27]. IR promotes atherosclerosis by inducing the inflammatory activity of blood vessels and immune cells. Additionally, the higher the IR index is, the higher the CAC is [28]. However, another study conducted in 1632 nondiabetic people showed that IR is only related to CAC and not to abdominal aortic calcification or thoracic aortic calcification [29]. Additionally, hyperinsulinemia decreases OPG and MGP levels, activates BMP-2, and increases CBFA-1 and ALP levels, leading to the bone-like transformation of interstitial cells. When hyperinsulinemia occurs, the clearance of Kupffer cells in the liver decreases [30]. This change leads to decreased clearance of lipopolysaccharides absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and a corresponding increase in circulating lipopolysaccharide and insulin levels. Additionally, in a rat study, inhibition of Kupffer cells caused increased glucose levels in the body and stimulated excessive insulin secretion, leading to IR [31]. Stefan and colleagues [32] found that plasma globulin A inhibits insulin signal transduction and induces IR, leading to atherosclerosis.

2.4. Obesity

Obesity is an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular disease. Obesity is common in patients with T2DM, while the average obesity rate in patients with T1DM is not higher than that of the general population. In patients with type 1 diabetes, obesity is closely related to the existence and progression of CAC. Currently, the relationship between obesity and T2DM is unclear. In a British study on all-cause mortality in patients with T2DM, patients with a BMI of 35–54 kg/m2 or 20–24 kg/m2 had an increased risk of all-cause mortality [33]. However, in a study of subclinical atherosclerosis in 52 overweight and obese patients with T2DM, obesity showed a weaker correlation with CAC [34]. Therefore, obesity may be less of a risk factor for vascular calcification in patients with diabetes. Studies have shown that epicardial fat is related to CAC, and the interaction between epicardial fat tissue and the coronary artery occurs through paracrine activity involving inflammatory markers, which may mediate and induce calcification [35]. In a study of 1414 African Americans, CAC and AAC were associated with epicardial fat [36]. Katsiki et al. also confirmed that epicardial fat is related to risk factors for vascular calcification [37].

2.5. Hypertension

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is a major pathogenic factor contributing to VSMC apoptosis, growth, and differentiation, thus suggesting the possible involvement of the system in arterial calcification. Ang II promotes VSMC differentiation into osteoblasts by activating RANKL [38]. Similarly, once aldosterone (Aldo) is overactivated, it promotes the progression of cardiovascular disease events. When Aldo is abnormally activated, it exerts a negative effect on blood vessel function and promotes vascular stress, proliferation, and vascular inflammation [39]. Studies have also shown that the promoter sequence of the pit-1 gene may contain an MRE, and Aldo triggers osteoinduction through pit-1. Pit-1 regulates phosphate absorption and is essential for phenotypic transformation and vascular calcification of VSMCs [40]. Li and colleagues [41] revealed that silencing pit-1 with a small interfering RNA reduced the mRNA levels of Cbfa1 and ALP and inhibited vascular calcification. Although many studies have investigated the role of aldosterone in vascular calcification, these findings provide a new target to treat vascular calcification (VC) [42]. The contribution of hypertension to VC remains unclear.

2.6. Kidney Disease

Epidemiological surveys have shown that people with diabetes are approximately twice as likely to develop chronic kidney disease as those without diabetes. A study of calcification in Chinese patients undergoing dialysis shows that the overall calcification rate in patients receiving dialysis is 77.4%. The incidence of CAC in nondialysis patients with type 2 diabetes presenting renal damage was higher than that in patients with type 2 diabetes without renal damage (95% and 59%), and the median CAC score was significantly higher [43]. With the continuous deterioration of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease, the probability of calcium and phosphorus metabolism disorder increases, and the degree of vascular calcification will be significantly increased. The microinflammatory state plays a key role in promoting the occurrence and development of vascular calcification. The microinflammatory state is a nondominant inflammatory state caused by an infection with a nonpathogenic microorganism and is characterized by low levels and continuous increases in inflammatory proteins and inflammatory cytokines in the systemic circulation and is common in patients with chronic kidney disease. A slight increase in these indexes is positively correlated with calcification-promoting factors, indicating that the microinflammatory state plays a role in promoting calcification.

2.7. Aging

Vascular calcification is a sign of aging. According to recent studies, aging promotes vascular calcification by inducing the osteogenic transformation of vascular smooth muscle cells, release of vesicles by endothelial cells, remodeling of extracellular matrix, imbalance of phosphorus metabolism, DNA damage, inflammatory response, and reduced expression of antiaging factors [4446]. At the same time, age also reflects the cumulative exposure of arterial media to other influencing factors. For example, advanced glycation end products (AGEs) are the end products of nonenzymatic glycosylation reactions. They are proteins that are generated and accumulate in tissues with age. In particular, the AGE concentration in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes is significantly higher than that in nondiabetic patients [47]. During hyperglycemia, AGE/RAGE signals are transmitted through PKC, p38 MAPK, TGF-β, and NF-κB, and other signaling pathways increase bone matrix proteins [4850]. Moreover, AGE/RAGE signaling has been shown to increase oxidative stress and promote diabetes-mediated vascular calcification by activating Nox-1 and decreasing SOD-1 expression [51, 52]. In addition, the risk of lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) in patients with diabetes and a history of more than 20 years of drinking was significantly higher than that in nondrinkers [53], suggesting that the relationship between alcohol consumption and vascular calcification also indicates that age plays an important role in vascular disease.

3. Distribution of Different Vascular Beds

Vascular calcification occurs in the intima and media. Intimal calcification occurs in cerebral arteries, carotid arteries, coronary arteries, aorta, renal arteries, and peripheral arteries of the limbs. Media calcification often coexists with intimal calcification but also exists independently of intimal calcification. In particular, it is common in lower extremity arterial disease in patients with diabetes [54]. When observed using ultrasound, the media and intima are distinct. Ultrasound reveals that calcification of the arterial media is continuous, smooth, and linearly hyperechoic in the blood vessel wall. Intimal calcification manifests as patchy protrusions from the lumen, disconnected calcification, and irregular hyperechoic calcification [55].

Differences in vascular calcification in different vascular beds have also been reported in recent years. One of the most studied types is CAC, which is a critical predictor of cardiovascular events independent of traditional risk factors. Similarly, the presence of thoracic aortic calcification is independently associated with total mortality [56], and the presence of abdominal aortic calcification is associated with fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events [57]. Allison and colleagues [58] found a difference in the prevalence of calcification among different vascular beds in 4544 patients who had undergone whole-body CT scans during an 8-year follow-up. Among them, calcification in the coronary artery had the highest prevalence (55.8%), followed by the abdominal aorta (54.8%), while calcification in the carotid artery had the lowest prevalence rate (32.2%). In a multiethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA), the association between abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) and diabetes was the strongest among all vascular beds [59]. Patients with calcification in the carotid, coronary, and iliac arteries have a significantly higher body mass index, and patients with calcification in any vascular bed other than the carotid artery have a higher probability of a family history of cardiovascular disease [58]. Cox and colleagues [60] found that for all-cause mortality, each increase in the standard deviation of CAC was associated with an approximately 1.8-fold increase in risk, while risks of CarCP and AACP increased by approximately 1.5-fold and 1.4-fold, respectively. This trend was also observed for the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality. However, in a study of 4,544 elderly individuals (average age: 56.8 years), Allison and colleagues [58] found that the abdominal aorta was associated with the highest all-cause mortality and CVD mortality among all vascular beds. Compared with changes in the coronary arteries, carotid arteries, and iliac arteries, the changes detected in the thoracic aorta are associated with a more than 2-fold increase in all-cause mortality, and this correlation is smallest in the coronary arteries. These different results may be attributed to the different prevalence rates of T2DM among study subjects and the low prevalence of early vascular calcification.

4. Sex Differences in Vascular Calcification

Many studies have shown sex differences in vascular calcification. Kronmal and colleagues found that the male sex was a significant risk factor for CAC. Compared with women, the prevalence of CAC in men is 43% higher [61]. The first appearance of atherosclerosis in women occurs 10 years later than in men [62]. Allison and colleagues evaluated 650 asymptomatic subjects and found that 47% of women younger than 50 years had calcifications compared with 70% of men [63]. This difference persists in the 50- to 60-year-old and 60- to 70-year-old age groups. However, after females undergo menopause, the prevalence of vascular calcification in women becomes significantly higher than that in men. This finding suggests that hormones related to menopause in females, such as estrogen, may exert a protective effect on the development of vascular calcification. However, studies have also shown that estrogen does not exert a protective effect on the more common plaque erosion in women [64].

The size of the sex difference in vascular calcification varies between races [65]. White men have the highest prevalence of CAC. However, another study of 16,560 asymptomatic subjects found no significant sex difference in vascular bed calcification between Hispanic and Caucasian subjects [66].

Currently, the explanation for the racial/ethnic differences in CAC sex differences remains speculative. Vitamin D gene polymorphisms are related to CAC levels [67]. Sex differences were found in vitamin D polymorphisms, and the size of the difference varied with ethnicity [65]. This finding suggests that vitamin D may be a mediating factor of sex differences in CAC. Among other vascular beds, white and Hispanic men are more likely to have aortic calcification (AVC) than women. Regarding the prevalence of thoracic aortic calcification (TAC), this sex difference seems to be reversed.

Except for African Americans, men of other races negatively correlate with the prevalence of TAC [68]. Niccoli et al. found that women have a higher prevalence of TAC than men [69]. Regarding abdominal calcification, Hess and Grant found that women have a higher incidence of abdominal calcification [70]. Additionally, sex differences were found in the earliest calcifications in the vascular bed. Men and women show the earliest calcifications in the coronary arteries and distal aorta, respectively.

5. Ethnic Differences in Vascular Calcification in Patients with Diabetes

In recent years, an increasing number of studies have identified significant ethnic differences in the prevalence of vascular calcification (Table 1). Among African Americans, each increase in standard deviation of individuals of European descent was associated with an 8% increase in the prevalence of coronary calcification [71]. However, another study did not appear to prove this result. Villadsen et al. conducted a study involving 420 Caucasian men and 543 men from South Asia, and reported that the Agatston calcium score in the diabetic group was significantly higher than that in the black group, but in the nondiabetic group, the difference was not confirmed [72]. Another study also confirmed that the CAC of white individuals is significantly higher than that of black individuals. Even after adjusting for CVD risk factors, this difference persisted [73]. Bild and colleagues [74] conducted the MESA study and found that compared with white individuals, the relative risks for coronary calcification were 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74–0.82) in black individuals, 0.85 (95% CI: 0.79–0.91) in Hispanic individuals, and 0.92 (95% CI 0.85–0.99) in Chinese individuals. Although the prevalence of CAC in individuals of African descent is lower than that in Caucasians, the incidence and mortality of coronary heart disease in individuals of African descent are higher than that of Caucasians [75]. Matthew and others [66] observed a significantly higher prevalence of CAC in Caucasians and Hispanics than in African and Asian men. After adjusting for related risk factors that increase the presence and severity of atherosclerosis because of the occurrence of kidney disease, these differences persisted, whereas the effect of diabetes ranged from 105% for more severe calcification () in Caucasians to 236% for more severe calcification in Asians. This conclusion confirms that vascular calcification caused by diabetes exerts a greater effect on Asians. In addition, compared with Japanese men, Caucasian American men had a heavier burden of coronary atherosclerosis, although Japanese men had higher blood pressure, total cholesterol levels, low-density lipoprotein levels, and smoking rates. Moreover, ethnic differences also increase with age, especially among people aged 45–74 years [76]. Another very interesting phenomenon is that the mortality rate of ASCVD (atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) in South Asians (people from Bangladesh, India, Bhutan, the Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka) is higher than that in other Asian groups and Caucasians, which is in sharp contrast to the finding that Asian Americans have a lower risk of ASCVD as a group [77]. The greatest risk factor contributing to this racial difference is the high incidence rate of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance in South Asians. The Agatston score of Caucasians is also slightly higher than that of South Asians (SA), and the burden of calcified plaques is also heavier, but the CAC scores of Germans and Caucasians are similar [78].


ReferenceAuthorSample sizeEthnicCalcification siteConclusion

[76]Akira Fujiyoshi et al.1899Caucasian men
Japanese men
Coronary artery calcificationCaucasian men in the United States had a higher burden of coronary atherosclerosis than Japanese men, but the ethnic difference was smaller in younger age groups.

[74]Diane E. Bild et al.6814Whites
Blacks
Hispanics
Chinese
Coronary artery calcificationAfter adjusting the relevant factors, whites have most coronary calcifications, followed by Chinese and Hispanics, and blacks have the least calcifications.

[66]Matthew J. Budoff et al.16,560Asians
African Americans
Hispanics
Coronary artery calcificationIncreasing prevalence of calcification is noted for all ethnicities with increasing ages. Men had greater prevalence of calcification than women for each ethnicity. Among men, Caucasians are most likely to develop severe CAC (), while African Americans are the least likely to develop. But among women, African Americans are the most prone to severe CAC.

[78]Erbel R et al.5346Americans
Germans
Coronary artery calcificationCoronary artery calcification prevalence was lower in the United States cohort than the German cohort.

[81]George Youssef et al.5886Whites
Blacks
Hispanics
Chinese
Thoracic aortic calcificationCompared with whites, the progression of thoracic aortic calcification in blacks and Hispanics is significantly slower, and this change is not significant among Chinese.

[82]A. Bellasi et al.142Blacks
Whites
Thoracic aortic calcificationPrevalence and severity of calcification of the thoracic aorta were similar among whites and blacks.

[83]Tulika Jain et al.6106Non-Hispanic Caucasian
African American
Coronary artery calcificationThere is no significant difference in coronary artery calcification between black and white men, but it is often higher in black women than in white women. At the same time, the death rate of coronary heart disease in blacks is not significantly higher than that of whites.

[71]Christina L. Wassel et al.1417Blacks
Hispanics
Coronary artery calcificationAmong African Americans, each SD increase in European ancestry was associated with an 8% (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.15; ) higher coronary artery calcification prevalence.

[72]Peter R. Villadsen et al.963Caucasians
South Asian
Coronary artery calcificationThe per cent noncalcified plaque composition was lower in Caucasians compared with SA. But the difference of Agatston calcium score () was seen in the nondiabetic group, but not in the diabetic group.

[73]Erqou et al.776Blacks and whitesCoronary artery calcificationBlacks had less CAC than whites and 50% lower odds of a significant CAC score compared with whites. After adjusting for CVD risk factors, this difference still exists.

HNR = Heinz Nixdorf Recall study; MESA = multiethnic study of atherosclerosis; SESSA = Shiga Epidemiological Study of Subclinical Atherosclerosis; SA = South Asian; CAC = coronary artery calcification; CVD = cardiovascular disease; SD = standard deviation.

Intra-arterial media thickness (IMT) is also a reliable indicator of atherosclerosis and can be used to quantify the burden of atherosclerotic disease in different ethnic groups. Compared with white individuals, black individuals usually have a thicker common carotid artery IMT and thinner internal carotid artery IMT. Using ultrasound to evaluate internal carotid artery atherosclerosis and predict subsequent coronary events, we found that black individuals had the highest common carotid artery IMT, but the internal carotid artery IMT was similar to that of white and Spanish individuals, and Chinese individuals had the lowest carotid IMT, particularly with respect to the internal carotid artery. Ethnic differences exist in the relationship between coronary artery calcification and carotid IMT [79]. For every 10% increase in the CAC score, the adjusted increase in internal carotid artery IMT was highest among Hispanic individuals (approximately 18.5%) and lowest among black individuals (approximately 6.1%). The prevalence and score of internal carotid artery IMT and CAC increased significantly with age [74]. Among these populations, Spanish men exhibited the smallest increase in coronary calcification with age, while white individuals exhibited the largest increase in IMT and calcification scores. Regardless of race, the common carotid artery IMT in patients with CAC is greater than that in patients without CAC. Regardless of whether CAC occurs, the greatest thickness of the carotid artery intima is observed in black individuals.

Wong and colleagues [80] reported that the prevalence of TAC ranges from 10% in men without CAC to 64% in men with CAC and from 15% to 82% in women (). Although the incidence of TAC among Chinese, black, and Hispanic individuals is lower than that among white individuals, only black individuals have a significantly lower relative risk of TAC than white individuals. In the multivariate model, the TAC progression of Hispanic individuals was significantly lower than that of white individuals by 14.8 units and that of black individuals was lower than that of white individuals by 18.4 units [81]. However, a cross-sectional survey of elderly hemodialysis patients with a high prevalence of diabetes in the United States showed no difference in the prevalence of coronary and thoracic aortic calcification between white and African American individuals [82]. Other studies also indicate no difference in the prevalence of coronary artery calcification between black and non-Hispanic white individuals [83].

In conclusion, compared with white individuals, the prevalence and severity of CAC and TAC in African American and Asian individuals are much lower, but the incidence and mortality of coronary heart disease in black individuals are higher. The reasons for ethnic differences might be related to differences in calcium metabolism [84], VD metabolism, and genetic and environmental factors. However, the specific reasons for this difference require further study.

6. Diagnosis and Severity Assessments

Patients with T2DM are at increased risk of adverse atherosclerotic events, including acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and ischemic stroke [85]. Early identification and prediction of severity are critical. Previously, various risk assessment algorithms, such as the Framingham risk score (FRS) and systematic coronary artery risk assessment (SCORE), were used to predict the likelihood of cardiovascular events [86]. Although these algorithms are considered useful tools for risk stratification in the general population, they lack sufficient capabilities and accuracy in patients with T2DM [87]. Currently, they are surrogate indicators for evaluating the risk of arterial calcification. Brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (FMD), carotid atherosclerotic burden, ankle-brachial index (ABI), arterial stiffness, CT coronary artery calcification scores (CACs), and invasive imaging testing have been increasingly used to predict cardiovascular events [8890].

6.1. Invasive Imaging Testing

Invasive imaging has become increasingly widely used in the detection of arterial calcification. As the clinical gold standard for evaluating coronary atherosclerosis disease, coronary angiography (CAG) is used to diagnose and quantify the degree of stenosis of the arterial lumen and has a high specificity. However, compared to other invasive imaging methods, the sensitivity (40%) is relatively low [91]. With the continuous increase in CAC, the lesions involve the vascular wall, preventing clinicians from accurately evaluating the imaging data [91].

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) involves an imaging technique performed by a special catheter with an ultrasound probe attached to the end to achieve cross-sectional imaging. IVUS has a higher sensitivity (90%) and specificity (100%) for the detection of CAC than CAG [92]. However, since ultrasound does not penetrate calcium deposits, the thickness and volume of calcifications cannot be calculated [93]. The high price of the test prevents this technology from being widely promoted.

Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is a new high-resolution cross-sectional imaging mode using light waves whose wavelength is similar to infrared. It has high sensitivity and specificity [94]. Compared to IVUS, it also has a high resolution. OCT is able to calculate the volume of calcification when light penetrates calcium to determine the thickness of the surface calcification [95].

6.2. Noninvasive Imaging Testing

Advances in the spatial and temporal resolution of CT have enabled the evaluation of vascular calcification lesions. CT represents the most commonly used noninvasive tool to detect and quantify calcification. The Agatston score, the standard CAC scoring method, classifies the severity of CAC. Many studies conducted in the past decade have also determined the prognostic value of CAC in mortality and overall cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients, which is now reflected in the main cardiology guidelines [96]. However, in patients with diabetes, CAC and carotid artery intima-media thickness (CIMT) both increase [97]. Studies have also shown that in the entire MESA cohort, CAC scores are more effective than CIMT for predicting cardiovascular events [98]. Traditionally, nonzero calcium scores have been stratified into low (1–100), moderate (101–400), and severe (>400), and a stepwise increase in risk for each category has been noted [99]. A comprehensive meta-analysis tested the prognostic significance of CAC in 29,312 individuals who were followed for 50 months and found that the risk of individuals with CAC was reduced by 85% compared with individuals with CAC . An interesting subgroup is the stratum with minimal but nonzero CAC scores (CAC score 1–10). Compared with subjects without CAC on CT, this group experienced a 3-fold increase in cardiac events [100, 101]. Another large review of 44,052 patients who received a CAC score found no clinical risk factors with a CAC . The event rate of patients was significantly higher than that of subjects with ≥3 risk factors but a CAC score of 0 [102]. In patients with type 2 diabetes, a coronary calcium score greater than 10 predicts cardiovascular events, all-cause mortality, or both and independently predicts cardiovascular events with high sensitivity but low specificity. As a tool for the early evaluation of asymptomatic arterial calcification, it not only is useful as a risk stratification tool for future cerebrovascular events in cardiovascular prevention programs but also provides prognostic information for asymptomatic people.

In recent years, positron emission tomography (PET) has been used for vascular imaging [103]. 18-NaF, the imaging agent used for PET, can be located in specific arterial calcifications. Compared to CT, PET detects microcalcifications better [104]. However, due to the high price, the examination is often not considered first when screening for asymptomatic patients for arterial calcification.

Measurement of the IMT has proven to be a powerful indicator of subclinical atherosclerosis and future cardiovascular risk in patients with and without T2DM. The carotid arterial IMT is a well-established surrogate marker for cardiovascular disease. Ultrasonic measurement of the IMT has the advantages of noninvasiveness, good repeatability, and simple operation and is widely used in clinical practice. Several studies have shown that the IMT predicts future myocardial infarction and cerebrovascular disease [105].

6.3. Serological Indicators to Assess Severity

Some serological indicators play an important role in the occurrence and development of diabetic vascular calcification. The detection of these indicators plays a key role in the early diagnosis and severity evaluation of complications of diabetic vascular calcification. von Scholten and colleagues [106] found that tumor necrosis factor-α is a powerful determinant of cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and is independently associated with vascular calcification mortality. OPG is a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor family implicated in the bone turnover process, osteoporosis, and premature vessel calcification. A recent study identified OPG as an important regulatory molecule in vascular diseases, including cerebral atherosclerosis, and showed its contribution to vessel calcifications in patients with T2DM, suggesting its possible role in the progression of vessel calcification lesions of other vascular beds, such as lower extremity PAD, in patients with diabetes [107]. hsCRP is one of the most sensitive biomarkers of inflammation that induces the release of HMGB-1. In patients with and without T2DM, elevated serum HMGB-1 levels are related to coronary heart disease and are closely related to the severity of coronary artery stenosis [108]. Omentin is an adipokine with anti-inflammatory effects. Yoo et al. and Liu and colleagues [109, 110] performed a cross-sectional study and showed that patients with T2DM and metabolic syndrome, particularly those with carotid artery calcification, exhibited lower omentin-1 levels than healthy subjects. Additionally, Biscetti and colleagues [111] analyzed serum omentin-1 levels in 600 patients with T2DM and found decreased serum omentin-1 levels in patients with T2DM presenting peripheral vascular disease (PAD), and omentin-1 levels are related to disease severity. IL-33/ST2L signaling exerts a cardioprotective effect and protects the myocardium from hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis after pressure overload. Sst2, the soluble form of suppression of tumorigenicity 2, blocks the binding of interleukin 33 (IL-33) to its transmembrane receptor and the subsequent cardioprotective cascade. Cardellini and colleagues [112] observed significantly increased plasma Sst2 levels in patients with type 2 diabetes. When Sst2 levels increased by one standard deviation, the risk of cardiovascular death was 1.050 (95% CI: 1.006–1.097; ), suggesting a role for Sst2 in the deterioration of cardiovascular function in high-risk groups. Haptoglobin (Hp) regulates the toxicity of hemoglobin in vitro. Simpson and colleagues found that the HP genotype may help predict the rate of progression of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with type 1 diabetes [113]. This result is consistent with previous studies by Roguin et al., Suleiman et al., and other teams [114, 115].

In previous studies, circulating cardiac biomarkers, including troponin T (TnT) and N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide (NTproBNP), were considered predictors of cardiovascular adverse events in the general population and patients with diabetes [116]. Recently, in a 13-year follow-up of 8402 participants without cardiovascular disease, the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that a troponin T  ng/L (HR: 1.96 (95% confidence interval: 1.57–2.46)) and NTproBNP  pg/mL (HR: 1.61 (95% confidence interval: 1.29–1.99)) were independent predictors of cardiovascular events [117]. This finding helps distinguish individuals with a high diabetes risk from those with a low diabetes risk and provides incremental risk prediction in addition to commonly used risk markers.

Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a severe complication of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) that dramatically increases the risk of limb amputation and mortality [118]. Many indicators have been identified to determine the severity of DFI and DFU, but relatively few studies are available on their relationship with the prognosis. Procalcitonin (PCT) is a peptide precursor of the hormone calcitonin, which is often undetectable or present at very low concentrations (<0.05 ng/mL) in healthy individuals. Furthermore, PCT is a prognostic marker of severity linked to mortality rates associated with infectious processes [119]. Meloni et al. [120] found that patients who were positive for PCT at admission exhibited a worse prognosis in terms of amputation and mortality than those with normal values. PCT is considered a predictor of death in patients with CLI and hospitalized patients with moderate to severe infections. Regardless of the clinical severity of the infection, its prognostic role should be considered when evaluating these patients.

6.4. Glycated Hemoglobin

The UKPDS study found that higher baseline HbA1c levels predicted coronary artery disease in patients with T2DM [121]. For every 1% increase in the glycosylated hemoglobin level, the incidence of cardiovascular events is estimated to increase by 11% to 16% [122]. Epidemiological evidence shows that for every 1% increase in HbA1c levels, cardiovascular events increase by 11%-16%, the incidence of PAD increases by 20%, and the rates of mortality, microvascular complications, and amputation also increase [123]. Anand and colleagues [124] used a multivariate model and found that baseline CAC and HbA1c were powerful predictors of the progression of CAC in patients with type 2 diabetes. Flammer et al. showed that the percentage of circulating OCN+ monocytes increased significantly and the number of OCN+ EPCs increased in patients with elevated HbA1c levels compared with those with normal HbA1c levels, indicating a correlation between the osteoblastic drift of EPCs and prediabetes HbA1c levels [125].

6.5. Ankle-Brachial Index

The ankle-brachial index (ABI) is critical for the diagnosis of cardiovascular complications of diabetes. The normal range of ABI is 1.00 to 1.40, and a higher prevalence of PAD and its values are all related to an increased risk of cardiovascular events [88]. A low ABI value has a strong predictive value for the occurrence of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular diseases and the overall mortality rate [126]. However, a high ABI value has a stronger correlation with stroke (HR: 2.69) [127]. Additionally, the ABI measurement is also commonly used to diagnose PAD. International guidelines addressing the diagnosis, treatment, and overall management of patients with PAD suggest the ABI as an initial diagnostic test for PAD. However, the ABI evaluation has a low sensitivity for detecting the initial stages of PAD and may not be applicable in patients with diabetes because of calcification of the arterial walls that potentially increases vessel stiffness.

7. Treatment and Outcomes of Vascular Calcification in Patients with Diabetes

7.1. Blood Sugar Control

Metformin, thiazolidinedione (TZD), sulfonylurea, and insulin are traditionally used to treat diabetes, and their benefits for patients with VC and CVD have also been documented in clinical studies in recent years. As a first-line hypoglycemic drug used in patients with type 2 diabetes, the hypoglycemic effect of metformin is mainly derived from increasing the activity of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) in the liver and reducing gluconeogenesis and adipogenesis. Its vascular protective effect is primarily achieved by inhibiting RANKL, increasing the activity of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS), and alleviating ROS-related damage [128130]. In a DIACART cross-sectional cohort study of 198 patients with T2DM, the CAC score of patients treated with metformin was significantly lower than that of patients without metformin treatment [131]. Similarly, 2029 patients with prediabetes had a low CAC score after 14 years of metformin treatment [132]. TZDS exerts its hypoglycemic and anti-inflammatory effects primarily by activating nuclear peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ (PPARγ). In a rat model induced by β-glycerophosphate, pioglitazone, a PPARγ receptor agonist, reduced VSMC calcification through the Wnt pathway [133]. Additionally, studies have shown that pioglitazone reverses tumor necrosis factor-α-induced endothelial dysfunction in patients with diabetes [134]. Sulfonylureas play a role by stimulating islet β-cells to release insulin. In diabetic mice, glibenclamide downregulates the levels of IL-10, IL-18, and TGF-β mRNAs, which are involved in the development of VC [135]. However, the exact mechanism by which sulfonylureas are involved in regulating VC is unclear, and further research is warranted.

Additionally, new hypoglycemic drugs, such as SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists, have been widely discussed because of their beneficial effects on cardiovascular diseases. SGLT-2 inhibitor is a recently developed ADDS that inhibits glucose reuptake in the proximal tubules of the nephron [136]. SGLT-2 inhibitors not only control blood glucose levels but also control blood pressure, improve renal function, and inhibit proinflammatory cytokines to inhibit calcification [137]. GLP-1 receptor agonists control blood sugar levels by promoting insulin production and inhibiting the release of glucagon. GLP-1 receptor agonists improve inflammation, endothelial function, and myocardial ischemia and lower blood pressure, which are the key protective factors for VC [138]. A comparative review of 20 studies also confirmed these findings [139]. However, to date, no clinical evidence has shown that SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLGLP1 agonists directly affect VC. Thus, further studies are required to improve our understanding of their roles in regulating VC.

7.2. Statins

Research by Son and colleagues showed that statins inhibit cellular apoptosis, thereby inhibiting vascular calcification [140]. However, some studies have reached different conclusions: statins help reduce LDL levels, preventing the development of flow-limiting lesions and reducing inflammation. However, their effects on preventing atherosclerosis and calcification are negligible [141].

7.3. OPG

The inactivation of osteoprotegerin (OPG) accelerates the progression of calcification [142], and OPG inhibits the differentiation and maturation of osteoclasts (OCs). Treatment with recombinant OPG prevents the occurrence of osteoporosis and vascular calcification and reverses osteoporosis [143]. Currently, continuous research on the mechanism of OPG is identifying its potential as a new target to treat vascular calcification.

7.4. Diet

Diabetes is a known risk factor for CAC. A high-sugar diet can induce calcification of human VSMCs by increasing the expression of bone formation markers [144]. In an animal experiment, Zhou and colleagues found that starch or sugar increases the incidence of CV calcification in mice [145]. Another study showed that a high-protein diet reduces renal calcification [146], while low protein intake leads to more severe renal calcification [147].

Unlike traditional methods, reduced calcium intake also causes increased renal calcification and aortic calcification, although high calcium intake is typically not related to vascular calcification in healthy people [148, 149]. Like calcium, phosphate is essential for cell signaling and energy storage in the form of ATP; thus, its concentration must be strictly controlled in the blood. Animal studies have shown a positive correlation between phosphorus intake and aortic and renal calcification [150], but studies on the effects of dietary phosphorus have shown no relationship with CAC [151]. In contrast, higher magnesium intake exerts a more obvious protective effect on CAC. Magnesium is a natural calcium channel blocker that plays an important role in CV. An in vitro study showed that increasing the concentration of magnesium reduces calcification of VSMCs [152]. Additionally, Kang and colleagues performed animal studies and found that high vitamin D intake leads to CV calcification [153], but other studies have indicated that a diet lacking vitamin D leads to an increase in calcified lesions [154]. The relationship between vitamin D disorder and MVC (internally measured vascular calcification) is U-shaped, indicating that excessive or insufficient vitamin D will increase MVC [155].

Oxidative damage is the primary cause of vascular calcification. In patients with diabetes, CV is particularly common, primarily due to increased ROS and lipid oxidation products, such as malondialdehyde. A cross-sectional study showed that the risk of CAC in people who were supplemented with vitamin E (α-tocopherol) was significantly higher than that in those who did not receive the supplement [156]. The combination of vitamin C (ascorbic acid) and vitamin E (α-tocopherol) reduces the induced calcification of VSMCs [157]. No study has reported a clear association between vitamin A and vascular calcification. Additionally, according to a retrospective analysis, in most studies, the increase in homocysteine levels was significantly positively correlated with coronary artery calcification [158]. Vitamin B12, vitamin B6, and folic acid reduce sulfur-containing amino acids and homocysteine in the body [159].

Vitamin K indirectly prevents calcification through the γ-carboxylation of its dependent protein, calcium-binding γ-carboxymethylglutamate (MGP). Many patients with CV calcification may also be taking the vitamin K antagonist warfarin, which blocks the γ-carboxylation of MGP and further increases calcification [160]. In the only human trial to study cardiovascular calcification, supplementation of 500 μg of phylloquinone daily in the elderly for three years reduced plasma ucMGP levels, significantly slowing the progression of calcification [161].

In summary, regarding diet, patients with a high risk of vascular calcification or extant vascular calcification should avoid eating processed foods rich in trans fatty acids and preservatives. We recommend that the intake of calcium, magnesium, vitamin B, vitamin D, vitamin K, and vitamin C be increased, particularly in patients with diabetes, along with reduced intake of excessive carbohydrates and increased consumption of protein.

8. Conclusions

Due to its high incidence and various complications, diabetes decreases the quality of life of patients, causing disability and even death. Among these complications, vascular calcification is one of the most important causes of arteriosclerosis and promotes various macrovascular complications. Currently, diabetic vascular calcification is difficult to completely reverse and eliminate; thus, the prevention of its occurrence and development is very important. Therefore, controllable risk factors should be evaluated in a timely manner, controlled, and corrected, and earlier preventive treatment with a higher cost-benefit ratio should be implemented. Additionally, differences were found in the incidence and prognosis among various vascular beds and in different ethnic groups, but the reasons for these differences remain unclear. Targeted detection and treatment of vascular calcification in various vascular beds and various ethnic groups are the top priority for ameliorating vascular calcification in patients with diabetes.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Consent is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Authors’ Contributions

Zhongqun Wang and Haipeng Yao conceived the topic and wrote the first draft. Zhen Sun, Guangyao Zang, Lili Zhang, Lina Hou, and Chen Shao went through the manuscript. All authors revised and approved the final draft.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported as follows: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82070455 and 81770450), the related Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20201225, M2020016, WSN-044, LGY2018092, and QNRC2016836), the Open Project Program of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Centre of Diabetic Systems Medicine (GKLCDSM-20210101-02), the Research and Innovation Funding Project for College Students in Experimental Animal Center of Jiangsu University, the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (KYCX20_2881 and SJKY19_2585), and the Zhenjiang Cardiovascular Clinical Research Center Project (SS2018008).

References

  1. J. Hjortnaes, S. E. New, and E. Aikawa, “Visualizing novel concepts of cardiovascular calcification,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 71–79, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. X. Xue, C. Zhizhi, and L. Zhaoyu, “Research progress on the regulatory mechanism of vascular smooth muscle cells in vascular calcification,” Journal of Clinical Cardiovascular Disease, vol. 36, no. 327, pp. 93–96, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  3. N. X. Chen, D. Duan, K. D. O'Neill, and S. M. Moe, “High glucose increases the expression of Cbfa1 and BMP-2 and enhances the calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells,” Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 3435–3442, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. N. Kapustin, J. D. Davies, J. L. Reynolds et al., “Calcium regulates key components of vascular smooth muscle cell-derived matrix vesicles to enhance mineralization,” Circulation Research, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. e1–e12, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. Y. Wang, J. Shan, W. Yang, H. Zheng, and S. Xue, “High mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) mediates high-glucose-induced calcification in vascular smooth muscle cells of saphenous veins,” Inflammation, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1592–1604, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. Yan, S. E. Stringer, A. Hamilton et al., “Decorin GAG synthesis and TGF-β signaling mediate Ox-LDL-induced mineralization of human vascular smooth muscle cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 608–615, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. L. L. Demer and Y. Tintut, “Inflammatory, metabolic, and genetic mechanisms of vascular calcification,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 715–723, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. P. Sage, Y. Tintut, and L. L. Demer, “Regulatory mechanisms in vascular calcification,” Nature Reviews Cardiology, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 528–536, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. M. Shanahan, M. H. Crouthamel, A. Kapustin, and C. M. Giachelli, “Arterial calcification in chronic kidney disease: key roles for calcium and phosphate,” Circulation Research, vol. 109, no. 6, pp. 697–711, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Gambardella, X. Wang, P. Mone, W. Khondkar, and G. Santulli, “Genetics of adrenergic signaling drives coronary artery calcification,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 310, pp. 88–90, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. M. Kay, C. L. Simpson, and J. A. Stewart Jr., “The role of AGE/RAGE signaling in diabetes-mediated vascular calcification,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2016, Article ID 6809703, 8 pages, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. M. Heath, Y. Sun, K. Yuan et al., “Activation of AKT by O-linked N-acetylglucosamine induces vascular calcification in diabetes mellitus,” Circulation Research, vol. 114, no. 7, pp. 1094–1102, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. Lanzhong and C. Zhong, “High glucose environment promotes the expression of cell core proteoglycan in mouse vascular calcification,” Prescription Drugs in China, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 13–15, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  14. R. Kawakami, S. Katsuki, R. Travers et al., “S100A9-RAGE axis accelerates formation of macrophage-mediated extracellular vesicle microcalcification in diabetes mellitus,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 1838–1853, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. E. Aikawa, M. Aikawa, P. Libby et al., “Arterial and aortic valve calcification abolished by elastolytic cathepsin S deficiency in chronic renal disease,” Circulation, vol. 119, no. 13, pp. 1785–1794, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. Nishikawa, D. Edelstein, X. L. Du et al., “Normalizing mitochondrial superoxide production blocks three pathways of hyperglycaemic damage,” Nature, vol. 404, no. 6779, pp. 787–790, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. I. Boström, M. Jumabay, A. Matveyenko, S. B. Nicholas, and Y. Yao, “Activation of vascular bone morphogenetic protein signaling in diabetes mellitus,” Circulation Research, vol. 108, no. 4, pp. 446–457, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. A. Allison, P. Pavlinac, and C. M. Wright, “The differential associations between HDL, non-HDL and total cholesterols and atherosclerotic calcium deposits in multiple vascular beds,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 194, no. 2, pp. e87–e94, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. R. C. Johnson, J. A. Leopold, and J. Loscalzo, “Vascular calcification: pathobiological mechanisms and clinical implications,” Circulation Research, vol. 99, no. 10, pp. 1044–1059, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. D. Proudfoot, J. D. Davies, J. N. Skepper, P. L. Weissberg, and C. M. Shanahan, “Acetylated low-density lipoprotein stimulates human vascular smooth muscle cell calcification by promoting osteoblastic differentiation and inhibiting phagocytosis,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 24, pp. 3044–3050, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. F. Parhami, B. Basseri, J. Hwang, Y. Tintut, and L. L. Demer, “High-density lipoprotein regulates calcification of vascular cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 570–576, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. T. Tang, S. R. Chen, X. Q. Wu et al., “Hypercholesterolemia accelerates vascular calcification induced by excessive vitamin D via oxidative stress,” Calcified Tissue International, vol. 79, no. 5, pp. 326–339, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. P. Bjornstad, D. M. Maahs, R. P. Wadwa et al., “Plasma triglycerides predict incident albuminuria and progression of coronary artery calcification in adults with type 1 diabetes: the Coronary Artery Calcification in Type 1 Diabetes Study,” Journal of Clinical Lipidology, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 576–583, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. N. M. Rajamannan, F. J. Evans, E. Aikawa et al., “Calcific aortic valve disease: not simply a degenerative process: a review and agenda for research from the National Heart and Lung and Blood Institute Aortic Stenosis Working Group. Executive summary: calcific aortic valve disease-2011 update,” Circulation, vol. 124, no. 16, pp. 1783–1791, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. L. A. Suzuki, M. Poot, R. G. Gerrity, and K. E. Bornfeldt, “Diabetes accelerates smooth muscle accumulation in lesions of atherosclerosis: lack of direct growth-promoting effects of high glucose levels,” Diabetes, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 851–860, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. Y. Xue, S. Lin, J. Y. Jia, and T. Yan, “Analysis of vascular calcification and its risk factors in uremic patients with diabetic nephropathy,” Journal of Jilin University (Medical Edition), vol. 5, pp. 946–951, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  27. T. Iguchi, T. Hasegawa, K. Otsuka et al., “Insulin resistance is associated with coronary plaque vulnerability: insight from optical coherence tomography analysis,” European Heart Journal Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 284–291, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. I. E. Schauer, J. K. Snell-Bergeon, B. C. Bergman et al., “Insulin resistance, defective insulin-mediated fatty acid suppression, and coronary artery calcification in subjects with and without type 1 diabetes: the CACTI study,” Diabetes, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 306–314, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. L. Ong, R. L. McClelland, K. A. Rye et al., “The relationship between insulin resistance and vascular calcification in coronary arteries, and the thoracic and abdominal aorta: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 236, no. 2, pp. 257–262, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Walrand, C. Guillet, Y. Boirie, and M. P. Vasson, “In vivo evidences that insulin regulates human polymorphonuclear neutrophil functions,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 1104–1110, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. R. P. Cornell, “Endogenous gut-derived bacterial endotoxin tonically primes pancreatic secretion of insulin in normal rats,” Diabetes, vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1253–1259, 1985. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. N. Stefan, A. M. Hennige, H. Staiger et al., “Alpha2-Heremans-Schmid glycoprotein/fetuin-A is associated with insulin resistance and fat accumulation in the liver in humans,” Diabetes Care, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 853–857, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. E. Mulnier, H. E. Seaman, V. S. Raleigh, S. S. Soedamah-Muthu, H. M. Colhoun, and R. A. Lawrenson, “Mortality in people with type 2 diabetes in the UK,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 516–521, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. R. A. Hegazi, K. Sutton-Tyrrell, R. W. Evans et al., “Relationship of adiposity to subclinical atherosclerosis in obese patients with type 2 diabetes,” Obesity Research, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 1597–1605, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. R. Nakanishi, R. Rajani, V. Y. Cheng et al., “Increase in epicardial fat volume is associated with greater coronary artery calcification progression in subjects at intermediate risk by coronary calcium score: a serial study using non-contrast cardiac CT,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 218, no. 2, pp. 363–368, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. Liu, C. S. Fox, D. Hickson et al., “Pericardial adipose tissue, atherosclerosis, and cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Jackson heart study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1635–1639, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. N. Katsiki, D. P. Mikhailidis, and A. S. Wierzbicki, “Epicardial fat and vascular risk: a narrative review,” Current Opinion in Cardiology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 458–463, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. M. K. Osako, H. Nakagami, M. Shimamura et al., “Cross-talk of receptor activator of nuclear factor-κB ligand signaling with renin-angiotensin system in vascular calcification,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 1287–1296, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. A. McCurley and I. Z. Jaffe, “Mineralocorticoid receptors in vascular function and disease,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 350, no. 2, pp. 256–265, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. J. Voelkl, I. Alesutan, C. B. Leibrock et al., “Spironolactone ameliorates PIT1-dependent vascular osteoinduction in klotho-hypomorphic mice,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 123, no. 2, pp. 812–822, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. X. Li, H. Y. Yang, and C. M. Giachelli, “Role of the sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter, Pit-1, in vascular smooth muscle cell calcification,” Circulation Research, vol. 98, no. 7, pp. 905–912, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. S. Y. Wu, Y. R. Yu, Y. Cai et al., “Endogenous aldosterone is involved in vascular calcification in rat,” Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.), vol. 237, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. Wang and Z. Li, “Diabetes and vascular calcification,” Chinese Journal of Arteriosclerosis, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 458–463, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  44. Y. Liu, I. Drozdov, R. Shroff, L. E. Beltran, and C. M. Shanahan, “Prelamin A accelerates vascular calcification via activation of the DNA damage response and senescence-associated secretory phenotype in vascular smooth muscle cells,” Circulation Research, vol. 112, no. 10, pp. e99–109, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. L. Hénaut, M. D. Sanchez-Nino, G. Aldamiz-Echevarría Castillo, A. B. Sanz, and A. Ortiz, “Targeting local vascular and systemic consequences of inflammation on vascular and cardiac valve calcification,” Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 89–105, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. M. Alique, M. P. Ruíz-Torres, G. Bodega et al., “Microvesicles from the plasma of elderly subjects and from senescent endothelial cells promote vascular calcification,” Aging, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 778–789, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. F. Giacco and M. Brownlee, “Oxidative stress and diabetic complications,” Circulation Research, vol. 107, no. 9, pp. 1058–1070, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. P. Geraldes and G. L. King, “Activation of protein kinase C isoforms and its impact on diabetic complications,” Circulation Research, vol. 106, no. 8, pp. 1319–1331, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. Tanikawa, Y. Okada, R. Tanikawa, and Y. Tanaka, “Advanced glycation end products induce calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells through RAGE/p38 MAPK,” Journal of Vascular Research, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 572–580, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. R. M. Liu and K. A. Gaston Pravia, “Oxidative stress and glutathione in TGF-beta-mediated fibrogenesis,” Free Radical Biology and Medicine, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. G. Daffu, C. H. del Pozo, K. M. O'Shea, R. Ananthakrishnan, R. Ramasamy, and A. M. Schmidt, “Radical roles for RAGE in the pathogenesis of oxidative stress in cardiovascular diseases and beyond,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 19891–19910, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. N. Stefan, A. Fritsche, C. Weikert et al., “Plasma fetuin-A levels and the risk of type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 2762–2767, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. S. Yang, S. Wang, B. Yang, J. Zheng, Y. Cai, and Z. Yang, “Alcohol consumption is a risk factor for lower extremity arterial disease in Chinese patients with T2DM,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2017, Article ID 8756978, 6 pages, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. M. Nativel, L. Potier, L. Alexandre et al., “Lower extremity arterial disease in patients with diabetes: a contemporary narrative review,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 17, no. 1, Article ID 138, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. Y. Lao, B. M. Luo, C. Yang et al., “Study on the influencing factors of intima-media calcification of lower extremity arteries in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Modern Hospital, vol. 18, no. 190, pp. 82–87, 2018. View at: Google Scholar
  56. R. D. Santos, J. A. Rumberger, M. J. Budoff et al., “Thoracic aorta calcification detected by electron beam tomography predicts all-cause mortality,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 131–135, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. P. W. Wilson, L. I. Kauppila, C. J. O'Donnell et al., “Abdominal aortic calcific deposits are an important predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality,” Circulation, vol. 103, no. 11, pp. 1529–1534, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. M. A. Allison, S. Hsi, C. L. Wassel et al., “Calcified atherosclerosis in different vascular beds and the risk of mortality,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 140–146, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. M. A. Allison, M. J. Budoff, K. Nasir et al., “Ethnic-specific risks for atherosclerotic calcification of the thoracic and abdominal aorta (from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis),” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 812–817, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. J. Cox, F. C. Hsu, S. Agarwal et al., “Prediction of mortality using a multi-bed vascular calcification score in the Diabetes Heart Study,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 13, p. 160, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. R. A. Kronmal, R. L. McClelland, R. Detrano et al., “Risk factors for the progression of coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic subjects: results from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA),” Circulation, vol. 115, no. 21, pp. 2722–2730, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. J. A. Hoff, E. V. Chomka, A. J. Krainik, M. Daviglus, S. Rich, and G. T. Kondos, “Age and gender distributions of coronary artery calcium detected by electron beam tomography in 35,246 adults,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 87, no. 12, pp. 1335–1339, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. M. A. Allison, M. H. Criqui, and C. M. Wright, “Patterns and risk factors for systemic calcified atherosclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 331–336, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. P. Burke, A. Farb, G. Malcom, and R. Virmani, “Effect of menopause on plaque morphologic characteristics in coronary atherosclerosis,” American Heart Journal, vol. 141, 2 Suppl, pp. S58–S62, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. A. Ginde, M. C. Liu, and C. A. Camargo Jr., “Demographic differences and trends of vitamin D insufficiency in the US population, 1988-2004,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 169, no. 6, pp. 626–632, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. M. J. Budoff, K. Nasir, S. Mao et al., “Ethnic differences of the presence and severity of coronary atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 343–350, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. K. A. Young, J. K. Snell-Bergeon, R. G. Naik et al., “Vitamin D deficiency and coronary artery calcification in subjects with type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 454–458, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. K. Nasir, R. Katz, J. Takasu et al., “Ethnic differences between extra-coronary measures on cardiac computed tomography: multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA),” Atherosclerosis, vol. 198, no. 1, pp. 104–114, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. G. Niccoli, S. Giubilato, L. Di Vito et al., “Severity of coronary atherosclerosis in patients with a first acute coronary event: a diabetes paradox,” European Heart Journal, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 729–741, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. K. Hess and P. J. Grant, “Inflammation and thrombosis in diabetes,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 105, Suppl 1, pp. S43–S54, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. C. L. Wassel, J. S. Pankow, C. A. Peralta, S. Choudhry, M. F. Seldin, and D. K. Arnett, “Genetic ancestry is associated with subclinical cardiovascular disease in African-Americans and Hispanics from the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 629–636, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. P. R. Villadsen, S. E. Petersen, D. Dey et al., “Coronary atherosclerotic plaque burden and composition by CT angiography in Caucasian and South Asian patients with stable chest pain,” European Heart Journal–Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 556–567, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. S. Erqou, K. E. Kip, S. R. Mulukutla, A. N. Aiyer, and S. E. Reis, “Racial differences in the burden of coronary artery calcium and carotid intima media thickness between Blacks and Whites,” Netherlands Heart Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 44–51, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. D. E. Bild, R. Detrano, D. Peterson et al., “Ethnic differences in coronary calcification: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA),” Circulation, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 1313–1320, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. Y. Liao and R. S. Cooper, “Continued adverse trends in coronary heart disease mortality among blacks, 1980-91,” Public Health Reports, vol. 110, no. 5, pp. 572–579, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  76. A. Fujiyoshi, K. Miura, T. Ohkubo et al., “MESA Research Group. Cross-sectional comparison of coronary artery calcium scores between Caucasian men in the United States and Japanese men in Japan: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis and the Shiga epidemiological study of subclinical atherosclerosis,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 180, no. 6, pp. 590–598, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. A. S. Volgman, L. S. Palaniappan, N. T. Aggarwal et al., “Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in South Asians in the United States: epidemiology, risk factors, and treatments: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 138, no. 1, pp. e1–e34, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. R. Erbel, J. A. Delaney, N. Lehmann et al., “Signs of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis in relation to risk factor distribution in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and the Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study (HNR),” European Heart Journal, vol. 29, no. 22, pp. 2782–2791, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. T. A. Manolio, A. M. Arnold, W. Post et al., “Ethnic differences in the relationship of carotid atherosclerosis to coronary calcification: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 132–138, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. N. D. Wong, M. Sciammarella, Y. Arad et al., “Relation of thoracic aortic and aortic valve calcium to coronary artery calcium and risk assessment,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 951–955, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. G. Youssef, M. Guo, R. L. McClelland et al., “Risk factors for the development and progression of thoracic aorta calcification: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis,” Academic Radiology, vol. 22, no. 12, pp. 1536–1545, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. A. Bellasi, E. Veledar, E. Ferramosca, C. Ratti, G. Block, and P. Raggi, “Markers of vascular disease do not differ in black and white hemodialysis patients despite a different risk profile,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 197, no. 1, pp. 242–249, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. T. Jain, R. Peshock, D. K. McGuire et al., “African Americans and Caucasians have a similar prevalence of coronary calcium in the Dallas Heart Study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 5, pp. 1011–1017, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. T. M. Doherty, L. A. Fitzpatrick, A. Shaheen, T. B. Rajavashisth, and R. C. Detrano, “Genetic determinants of arterial calcification associated with atherosclerosis,” Mayo Clinic Proceedings, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 197–210, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. W. B. Kannel and D. L. McGee, “Diabetes and cardiovascular disease,” The Framingham study. JAMA, vol. 241, no. 19, pp. 2035–2038, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. R. B. D'Agostino Sr., S. Grundy, L. M. Sullivan, P. Wilson, and CHD Risk Prediction Group, “Validation of the Framingham coronary heart disease prediction scores: results of a multiple ethnic groups investigation,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 286, no. 2, pp. 180–187, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. A. A. van der Heijden, M. M. Ortegon, L. W. Niessen, G. Nijpels, and J. M. Dekker, “Prediction of coronary heart disease risk in a general, pre-diabetic, and diabetic population during 10 years of follow-up: accuracy of the Framingham, SCORE, and UKPDS risk functions: The Hoorn Study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2094–2098, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. Ankle Brachial Index Collaboration, “Ankle brachial index combined with Framingham Risk Score to predict cardiovascular events and Mortality,” JAMA, vol. 300, no. 2, pp. 197–208, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. G. F. Mitchell, S. J. Hwang, R. S. Vasan et al., “Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study,” Circulation, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 505–511, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. R. S. Elkeles, I. F. Godsland, M. D. Feher et al., “Coronary calcium measurement improves prediction of cardiovascular events in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes: the PREDICT study,” European Heart Journal, vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 2244–2251, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. E. M. Tuzcu, B. Berkalp, A. C. De Franco et al., “The dilemma of diagnosing coronary calcification: angiography versus intravascular ultrasound,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 832–838, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. G. J. Friedrich, N. Y. Moes, V. A. Mühlberger et al., “Detection of intralesional calcium by intracoronary ultrasound depends on the histologic pattern,” American Heart Journal, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 435–441, 1994. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. J. B. Lee, G. S. Mintz, J. B. Lisauskas et al., “Histopathologic validation of the intravascular ultrasound diagnosis of calcified coronary artery nodules,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 108, no. 11, pp. 1547–1551, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. H. Yabushita, B. E. Bouma, S. L. Houser et al., “Characterization of human atherosclerosis by optical coherence tomography,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 13, pp. 1640–1645, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. T. Kume, H. Okura, T. Kawamoto et al., “Assessment of the coronary calcification by optical coherence tomography,” EuroIntervention, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 768–772, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. G. H. Tison, M. J. Blaha, and K. Nasir, “Atherosclerosis imaging in multiple vascular beds--enough heterogeneity to improve risk prediction?” Atherosclerosis, vol. 214, no. 2, pp. 261–263, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. N. D. Wong, M. G. Sciammarella, D. Polk et al., “The metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and subclinical atherosclerosis assessed by coronary calcium,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 1547–1553, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. A. R. Folsom, R. A. Kronmal, R. C. Detrano et al., “Coronary artery calcification compared with carotid intima-media thickness in the prediction of cardiovascular disease incidence: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA),” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 168, no. 12, pp. 1333–1339, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. R. Nakanishi, D. Li, M. J. Blaha et al., “All-cause mortality by age and gender based on coronary artery calcium scores,” European Heart Journal–Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1305–1314, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. A. Sarwar, L. J. Shaw, M. D. Shapiro et al., “Diagnostic and prognostic value of absence of coronary artery calcification,” JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 675–688, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. K. Nasir, J. Rubin, M. J. Blaha et al., “Interplay of coronary artery calcification and traditional risk factors for the prediction of all-cause mortality in asymptomatic individuals,” Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 467–473, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. K. Yahagi, F. D. Kolodgie, C. Lutter et al., “Pathology of human coronary and carotid artery atherosclerosis and vascular calcification in diabetes mellitus,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 191–204, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. N. V. Joshi, A. T. Vesey, M. C. Williams et al., “18F-fluoride positron emission tomography for identification of ruptured and high-risk coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a prospective clinical trial,” Lancet, vol. 383, no. 9918, pp. 705–713, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. M. R. Dweck, M. W. Chow, N. V. Joshi et al., “Coronary arterial 18F-sodium fluoride uptake: a novel marker of plaque biology,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 17, pp. 1539–1548, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. P. J. Touboul, A. Elbaz, C. Koller et al., “Common carotid artery intima-media thickness and brain infarction : the Etude du Profil Génétique de l’Infarctus Cérébral (GENIC) case-control study. The GENIC Investigators,” Circulation, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 313–318, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. B. J. von Scholten, H. Reinhard, T. W. Hansen et al., “Markers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction are associated with incident cardiovascular disease, all-cause mortality, and progression of coronary calcification in type 2 diabetic patients with microalbuminuria,” Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 248–255, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. E. Harper, H. Forde, C. Davenport, K. D. Rochfort, D. Smith, and P. M. Cummins, “Vascular calcification in type-2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease: Integrative roles for OPG, RANKL and TRAIL,” Vascular Pharmacology, vol. 82, pp. 30–40, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. X. X. Yan, L. Lu, W. H. Peng et al., “Increased serum HMGB1 level is associated with coronary artery disease in nondiabetic and type 2 diabetic patients,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 205, no. 2, pp. 544–548, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. H. J. Yoo, S. Y. Hwang, H. C. Hong et al., “Association of circulating omentin-1 level with arterial stiffness and carotid plaque in type 2 diabetes,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 10, p. 103, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. R. Liu, X. Wang, and P. Bu, “Omentin-1 is associated with carotid atherosclerosis in patients with metabolic syndrome,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 93, no. 1, pp. 21–25, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  111. F. Biscetti, E. Nardella, N. Bonadia et al., “Association between plasma omentin-1 levels in type 2 diabetic patients and peripheral artery disease,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 18, no. 1, p. 74, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  112. M. Cardellini, S. Rizza, V. Casagrande et al., “Soluble ST2 is a biomarker for cardiovascular mortality related to abnormal glucose metabolism in high-risk subjects,” Acta Diabetologica, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 273–280, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  113. M. Simpson, J. K. Snell-Bergeon, G. L. Kinney et al., “Haptoglobin genotype predicts development of coronary artery calcification in a prospective cohort of patients with type 1 diabetes,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 10, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  114. A. Roguin, W. Koch, A. Kastrati, D. Aronson, A. Schomig, and A. P. Levy, “Haptoglobin genotype is predictive of major adverse cardiac events in the 1-year period after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in individuals with diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2628–2631, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  115. M. Suleiman, D. Aronson, R. Asleh et al., “Haptoglobin polymorphism predicts 30-day mortality and heart failure in patients with diabetes and acute myocardial infarction,” Diabetes, vol. 54, no. 9, pp. 2802–2806, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  116. G. S. Hillis, P. Welsh, J. Chalmers et al., “The relative and combined ability of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to predict cardiovascular events and death in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 295–303, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  117. M. Gori, D. K. Gupta, B. Claggett et al., “Natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin for cardiovascular risk prediction in diabetes: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 677–685, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  118. L. A. Lavery, D. G. Armstrong, R. P. Wunderlich, M. J. Mohler, C. S. Wendel, and B. A. Lipsky, “Risk factors for foot infections in individuals with diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1288–1293, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  119. K. L. Becker, R. Snider, and E. S. Nylen, “Procalcitonin in sepsis and systemic inflammation: a harmful biomarker and a therapeutic target,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 159, no. 2, pp. 253–264, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  120. M. Meloni, V. Izzo, L. Giurato et al., “Procalcitonin is a prognostic marker of hospital outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia and diabetic foot infection,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2019, Article ID 4312737, 5 pages, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  121. R. C. Turner, H. Millns, H. A. Neil et al., “Risk factors for coronary artery disease in non-insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS: 23),” BMJ, vol. 316, no. 7134, pp. 823–828, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  122. R. R. Holman, S. K. Paul, M. A. Bethel, D. R. Matthews, and H. A. Neil, “10-year follow-up of intensive glucose control in type 2 diabetes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 15, pp. 1577–1589, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  123. E. B. Jude, S. O. Oyibo, N. Chalmers, and A. J. Boulton, “Peripheral arterial disease in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: a comparison of severity and outcome,” Diabetes Care, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1433–1437, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  124. D. V. Anand, E. Lim, D. Darko et al., “Determinants of progression of coronary artery calcification in type 2 diabetes role of glycemic control and inflammatory/vascular calcification markers,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 23, pp. 2218–2225, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  125. A. J. Flammer, M. Gössl, J. Li et al., “Patients with an HbA1c in the prediabetic and diabetic range have higher numbers of circulating cells with osteogenic and endothelial progenitor cell markers,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 97, no. 12, pp. 4761–4768, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  126. G. C. Leng, F. G. Fowkes, A. J. Lee, J. Dunbar, E. Housley, and C. V. Ruckley, “Use of ankle brachial pressure index to predict cardiovascular events and death: a cohort study,” Bmj, vol. 313, no. 7070, pp. 1440–1444, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  127. M. H. Criqui, R. L. McClelland, M. M. McDermott et al., “The Ankle-Brachial Index and Incident Cardiovascular Events in the MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) - ScienceDirect,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 56, no. 18, pp. 1506–1512, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  128. E. Cuyàs, B. Martin-Castillo, J. Bosch-Barrera, and J. A. Menendez, “Metformin inhibits RANKL and sensitizes cancer stem cells to denosumab,” Cell Cycle, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1022–1028, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  129. X. Cao, H. Li, H. Tao et al., “Metformin inhibits vascular calcification in female rat aortic smooth muscle cells via the AMPK-eNOS-NO pathway,” Endocrinology, vol. 154, no. 10, pp. 3680–3689, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  130. W. Q. Ma, X. J. Sun, Y. Wang, Y. Zhu, X. Q. Han, and N. F. Liu, “Restoring mitochondrial biogenesis with metformin attenuates β-GP-induced phenotypic transformation of VSMCs into an osteogenic phenotype via inhibition of PDK4/oxidative stress-mediated apoptosis,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 479, pp. 39–53, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  131. A. Mary, A. Hartemann, S. Liabeuf et al., “Association between metformin use and below-the-knee arterial calcification score in type 2 diabetic patients,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 24, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  132. R. B. Goldberg, V. R. Aroda, D. A. Bluemke et al., “Diabetes Prevention Program Research GroupEffect of long-term metformin and lifestyle in the diabetes prevention program and its outcome study on coronary artery calcium,” Circulation, vol. 136, no. 1, pp. 52–64, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  133. M. Gao, T. Chen, L. Wu, X. Zhao, H. Mao, and C. Xing, “Effect of pioglitazone on the calcification of rat vascular smooth muscle cells through the downregulation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 6208–6213, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  134. F. M. Martens, T. J. Rabelink, J. Roodt, E. J. de Koning, and F. L. Visseren, “TNF-alpha induces endothelial dysfunction in diabetic adults, an effect reversible by the PPAR-gamma agonist pioglitazone,” European Heart Journal, vol. 27, no. 13, pp. 1605–1609, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  135. R. E. Mirza, M. M. Fang, E. M. Weinheimer-Haus, W. J. Ennis, and T. J. Koh, “Sustained inflammasome activity in macrophages impairs wound healing in type 2 diabetic humans and mice,” Diabetes, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 1103–1114, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  136. A. Gupta, E. Lau, R. Varshney et al., “The identification of calcified coronary plaque is associated with initiation and continuation of pharmacological and lifestyle preventive therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 833–842, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  137. C. Loutradis, E. Papadopoulou, E. Angeloudi, A. Karagiannis, and P. Sarafidis, “The beneficial hemodynamic actions of SGLT-2 inhibitors beyond the management of hyperglycemia,” Current Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 27, no. 39, pp. 6682–6702, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  138. M. I. Del Olmo-Garcia and J. F. Merino-Torres, “GLP-1 receptor agonists and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2018, Article ID 4020492, 12 pages, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  139. I. R. Marlet, J. N. E. Ölmestig, T. Vilsbøll, J. Rungby, and C. Kruuse, “Neuroprotective mechanisms of glucagon-like peptide-1-based therapies in ischaemic stroke: a systematic review based on pre-clinical studies,” Basic & Clinical Pharmacology & Toxicology, vol. 122, no. 6, pp. 559–569, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  140. B. K. Son, K. Kozaki, K. Iijima et al., “Statins protect human aortic smooth muscle cells from inorganic phosphate-induced calcification by restoring Gas6-Axl survival pathway,” Circulation Research, vol. 98, no. 8, pp. 1024–1031, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  141. A. B. Rossebø, T. R. Pedersen, K. Boman et al., “SEAS Investigators. Intensive lipid lowering with simvastatin and ezetimibe in aortic stenosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 359, no. 13, pp. 1343–1356, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  142. B. J. Bennett, M. Scatena, E. A. Kirk et al., “Osteoprotegerin inactivation accelerates advanced atherosclerotic lesion progression and calcification in older ApoE-/- mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2117–2124, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  143. H. Min, S. Morony, I. Sarosi et al., “Osteoprotegerin reverses osteoporosis by inhibiting endosteal osteoclasts and prevents vascular calcification by blocking a process resembling osteoclastogenesis,” Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 192, no. 4, pp. 463–474, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  144. F. Liu, H. Zhong, J. Y. Liang et al., “Effect of high glucose levels on the calcification of vascular smooth muscle cells by inducing osteoblastic differentiation and intracellular calcium deposition via BMP-2/Cbfα-1 pathway,” Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE B, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 905–911, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  145. Y. B. Zhou, J. Zhang, Y. Cai et al., “Insulin resistance induces medial artery calcification in fructose-fed rats,” Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.), vol. 237, no. 1, pp. 50–57, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  146. J. C. Gigliotti, A. L. Smith, J. Jaczynski, and J. C. Tou, “Consumption of krill protein concentrate prevents early renal injury and nephrocalcinosis in female Sprague-Dawley rats,” Urological Research, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  147. S. F. Wen, T. P. Huang, and A. V. Moorthy, “Effects of low-protein diet on experimental diabetic nephropathy in the rat,” The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 589–597, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  148. U. Agata, J. H. Park, S. Hattori et al., “The effect of different amounts of calcium intake on bone metabolism and arterial calcification in ovariectomized rats,” Journal of Nutritional Science and Vitaminology (Tokyo), vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  149. H. H. Hsu and N. C. Culley, “Effects of dietary calcium on atherosclerosis, aortic calcification, and icterus in rabbits fed a supplemental cholesterol diet,” Lipids in Health and Disease, vol. 5, p. 16, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  150. M. S. Calvo and J. Uribarri, “Public health impact of dietary phosphorus excess on bone and cardiovascular health in the general population,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 98, no. 1, pp. 6–15, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  151. S. M. Kwak, J. S. Kim, Y. Choi et al., “Dietary intake of calcium and phosphorus and serum concentration in relation to the risk of coronary artery calcification in asymptomatic adults,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1763–1769, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  152. S. Salem, H. Bruck, F. H. Bahlmann et al., “Relationship between magnesium and clinical biomarkers on inhibition of vascular calcification,” American Journal of Nephrology, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 31–39, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  153. Y. H. Kang, J. S. Jin, D. W. Yi, and S. M. Son, “Bone morphogenetic protein-7 inhibits vascular calcification induced by high vitamin D in mice,” The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 221, no. 4, pp. 299–307, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  154. N. Schmidt, C. Brandsch, H. Kühne, A. Thiele, F. Hirche, and G. I. Stangl, “Vitamin D receptor deficiency and low vitamin D diet stimulate aortic calcification and osteogenic key factor expression in mice,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 4, article e35316, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  155. T. B. Drüeke and Z. A. Massy, “Role of vitamin D in vascular calcification: bad guy or good guy?” Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1704–1707, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  156. C. Hatzigeorgiou, A. J. Taylor, I. M. Feuerstein, L. Bautista, and P. G. O'Malley, “Antioxidant vitamin intake and subclinical coronary atherosclerosis,” Preventive Cardiology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 75–81, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  157. G. Muteliefu, A. Enomoto, and T. Niwa, “Indoxyl sulfate promotes proliferation of human aortic smooth muscle cells by inducing oxidative stress,” Journal of Renal Nutrition, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 29–32, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  158. A. L. Cancela, R. D. Santos, S. M. Titan et al., “Phosphorus is associated with coronary artery disease in patients with preserved renal function,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 5, article e36883, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  159. O. Stanger, W. Herrmann, K. Pietrzik et al., “DACH-LIGA Homocystein e.V. DACH-LIGA homocystein (German, Austrian and Swiss homocysteine society): consensus paper on the rational clinical use of homocysteine, folic acid and B-vitamins in cardiovascular and thrombotic diseases: guidelines and recommendations,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 41, no. 11, pp. 1392–1403, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  160. C. Palaniswamy, W. S. Aronow, A. Sekhri et al., “Warfarin use and prevalence of coronary artery calcification assessed by multislice computed tomography,” American Journal of Therapeutics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 148–151, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  161. M. K. Shea, C. J. O'Donnell, U. Hoffmann et al., “Vitamin K supplementation and progression of coronary artery calcium in older men and women,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1799–1807, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Haipeng Yao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views129
Downloads99
Citations

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.