Research Article

Association of Body Fat Percentage with Time in Range Generated by Continuous Glucose Monitoring during Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion Therapy in Type 2 Diabetes

Figure 2

Prevalence of obese participants stratified by body fat percentage, BMI, waist circumference, or visceral fat area among different tertiles of TIRa. (a) Prevalence of “normal fat” and “overfat” in different tertiles (T1-T3) of TIR. Overfat was defined as an amount of body fat of at least 25% of total body mass for men and at least 30% for women. The prevalence of overfat was 65.5% in T1 group, 41.4% in T2 group, and 33.3% in T3 group (). value for the significant difference among the groups was determined by test. (b) Prevalence of “” and “” in different tertiles (T1-T3) of TIR. The prevalence of “” was 48.3% in T1 group, 44.8% in T2 group, and 51.9% in T3 group (). value for the significant difference among the groups was determined by test. (c) Prevalence of “normal waist circumference” and “high waist circumference” in different tertiles (T1-T3) of TIR. A in women and >102 cm in men was classified as high waist circumference. The prevalence of high waist circumference was 28.6% in T1 group, 18.5% in T2 group, and 34.6% in T3 group (). value for the significant difference among the groups was determined by test. (d) Prevalence of “nonvisceral obesity” and “visceral obesity” in different tertiles (T1-T3) of TIR. The visceral obesity was defined as visceral fat . The prevalence of visceral obesity was 67.9% in T1 group, 50.0% in T2 group, and 53.8% in T3 group (). value for the significant difference among the groups was determined by test. aTIR , T2: 43.76-57.29%, T3: ≥57.30%.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)