Journal of Diabetes Research

Journal of Diabetes Research / 2021 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 |Article ID 6673525 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6673525

Maoyan Wu, Huiwen Xu, Jingyu Liu, Xiaozhen Tan, Shengrong Wan, Man Guo, Yang Long, Yong Xu, "Metformin and Fibrosis: A Review of Existing Evidence and Mechanisms", Journal of Diabetes Research, vol. 2021, Article ID 6673525, 11 pages, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6673525

Metformin and Fibrosis: A Review of Existing Evidence and Mechanisms

Academic Editor: Akira Sugawara
Received22 Nov 2020
Revised01 Apr 2021
Accepted05 Apr 2021
Published29 Apr 2021

Abstract

Fibrosis is a physiological response to organ injury and is characterized by the excessive deposition of connective tissue components in an organ, which results in the disruption of physiological architecture and organ remodeling, ultimately leading to organ failure and death. Fibrosis in the lung, kidney, and liver accounts for a substantial proportion of the global burden of disability and mortality. To date, there are no effective therapeutic strategies for controlling fibrosis. A class of metabolically targeted chemicals, such as adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activators and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists, shows strong potential in fighting fibrosis. Metformin, which is a potent AMPK activator and is the only recommended first-line drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, has emerged as a promising method of fibrosis reduction or reversion. In this review, we first summarize the key experimental and clinical studies that have specifically investigated the effects of metformin on organ fibrosis. Then, we discuss the mechanisms involved in mediating the antifibrotic effects of metformin in depth.

1. Introduction

Fibrosis is a response in organs to a trigger or injury and is described as a condition with excessive deposition of connective tissue components in an organ. The deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins leads to the disruption of physiological architecture, organ remodeling, and ultimately organ malfunction. Diseases including nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), cirrhosis, chronic kidney disease, heart failure, myocardial infarction (MI), diabetes, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and scleroderma are strongly associated with fibrosis. In total, the annualized incidence of major fibrosis-related conditions is approximately 4968 per 100,000 person-years. Furthermore, the global burden of liver fibrosis is significant, affecting 1 in 4 people [1, 2]. The prevalence of fibrosis is 1 in 6 persons for the kidneys, 1 in 60 for the heart, 1 in 1500 for the lungs, and 1 in 5400 for the skin [38].

The outcomes of fibrosis depend on the affected organ. Fibrosis of internal organs, such as the liver, kidney, heart, or lung, leads to organ dysfunction and failure and finally to death. However, there is currently no effective cure for fibrosis. It is meaningful to identify means of ameliorating the progression of tissue fibrogenesis. Metformin was initially developed as an antidiabetic drug in the 1950s and has gained further attention due to its many potential therapeutic benefits, excellent safety profiles, and relatively low risk of side effects [9]. Owing to its excellent performance in controlling glycemia, as well as its cost-effectiveness and safety, it is recommended as the only first-line drug for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Additionally, metformin also exerts weight loss [10], antioncogenic [11], anti-inflammatory [12], and antiaging [13] effects and influences the gut microbiota and immune system [14]. Interestingly, emerging experimental data from in vivo and in vitro studies indicate that metformin performs excellently in fighting fibrosis. It is suggested that metformin may have potential in clinical therapy, and some clinical trials have evaluated its potential in treating fibrosis in patients with liver, lung, and ovarian fibrosis. As mentioned above, metformin is a versatile drug that can act on multiple organs and tissues through a variety of potential mechanisms [15]. Most importantly, the liver and muscles are the main targets of metformin, which effectively lowers glucose by increasing glucose uptake in the liver and muscles and reducing gluconeogenesis. Metformin has been reported to inhibit intestinal glucose absorption, enhance intestinal glucose utilization, improve glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) secretion from intestinal enteroendocrine L cells, and modulate gut microbiota [16, 17]. Mitochondrial respiratory chain and adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation may play a central role in metformin-mediated regulation of energy metabolism and the redox state. Anti-inflammatory effects and modulation of immune cell function have also been reported. By searching the literature, we found that there are many studies on the mechanisms of metformin in fibrosis, which indicate that metformin mainly exerts antifibrosis effects by affecting the Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGF-β) signaling pathway, cell metabolism, and oxidative stress. In this review, we first summarize the key experimental and clinical studies that have specifically investigated the effects of metformin on organ fibrosis (shown in Figure 1). Then, we discuss the mechanisms involved in mediating the antifibrotic effects of metformin in depth (shown in Figures 2 and 3).

2. Experimental and Clinical Evidence of the Antifibrotic Effects of Metformin

Metabolic alterations are increasingly recognized as important in the pathogenesis of fibrosis in many organs. Metformin, which is a potent AMPK activator and is effective in ameliorating insulin resistance, has emerged as a promising method to fight against fibrosis.

Recently, a study published in Nature Medicine aroused wide interest. In this study, researchers found that metformin treatment effectively prevented and slowed the progression of fibrosis, and impressively, it was potent in promoting fibrosis resolution and reversing established fibrosis in a bleomycin-induced murine lung fibrosis model [18]. Consistently, positive outcomes were also observed in bronchopulmonary dysplasia induced by hyperoxia [19], PM2.5-induced lung injury [20], cultured precision-cut lung slices derived from human IPF patients [21], and radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis [22]. Some studies also found that metformin administration improved left ventricular function in a permanent left coronary artery occlusion mouse model [23] and in dogs with pacing-induced heart failure [24]. Metformin-mediated cardioprotective effects may be attributed to significantly reduced cardiac fibrosis induced by rapid right ventricular pacing [24], pressure overload [25], Ang II [26, 27], δ-sarcoglycan deficiency [28], MI [29], and PM2.5 [20]. Additionally, metformin treatment has been demonstrated to slow cystogenesis in a murine model of autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease [30]. It has also been reported to reduce renal fibrosis in high-fat diet-fed rats [31], unilateral ureteral obstruction (UUO) mice [32, 33], folic acid-induced renal fibrosis [32, 34], adenine-induced chronic kidney disease rats [35], and cyclosporine A-induced renal fibrosis rats [36]. Moreover, accumulating evidence has shown that metformin has great potential in alleviating the progression of fibrosis in various organs. Metformin produced antifibrotic effects and protected against aberrant ECM remodeling in visceral adipose tissue of ob/ob mice [37] and subcutaneous adipose tissue of doxorubicin-treated mice [38]. Metformin-mediated reduced fibrosis was also observed in ovarian and uterine tissues from a dehydroepiandrosterone-induced polycystic ovarian syndrome model [39], skin of bleomycin-induced scleroderma [40], peritoneal tissue of a peritoneal dialysis animal model [41], and peritendinous tissue of injury-induced peritendinous adhesion rats [42].

Clinically, it has been proven that metformin therapy results in isotropic collagen organization and reduced fibrosis in postmenopausal ovaries of patients taking metformin for T2DM treatment at the time of oophorectomy [43]. Given the ovarian cancer risk reduction observed with metformin use in T2DM women [44] and the role of metformin in suppressing age-associated fibrosis in ovaries, metformin is suggested to have potential for ovarian cancer prophylaxis. Consistently, an open-labeled, randomized trial in which 55 nondiabetic NAFLD patients were treated with metformin at a daily maximum dose of 2000 mg/day for 12 months showed that metformin treatment produced more than decreased fat percentage and necroinflammation, as it was surprising that a remarkable decrease in fibrosis score was observed in the posttreatment biopsy of 17 metformin-treated NAFLD patients [45]. It was disappointing that some clinical trials unexpectedly showed that metformin treatment was less effective in ameliorating liver fibrosis in NAFLD patients [4651]. Despite the lesser effects of metformin on liver fibrosis, it was shown that metformin effectively restricted damage to hepatocytes with decreased levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and resulted in improved necroinflammation and ballooning degeneration scores [47, 48, 51].

As mentioned above, in vitro and preclinical experiments showed how strong and potent metformin is in fighting fibrosis. However, evidence from clinical studies on the antifibrosis effect of metformin is insufficient. Next, we will discuss the mechanisms involved in mediating the antifibrotic effects of metformin in depth based on existing research, summarize the targets of metformin’s antifibrosis effects, and try to provide directions for future clinical trials of metformin’s antifibrosis effects.

3. The Underlying Mechanisms of Metformin in Antifibrosis

3.1. Metformin and TGF-β1 Signaling Pathways
3.1.1. Canonical TGF-β1 Signaling Pathways

Activation of the TGF-β1-Smad2/3 cascade plays an essential role in gene expression, including encoding ECM proteins. Activated TGF-β1 binds to its type II receptor, which recruits its type I receptor and then phosphorylates the COOH-terminal domains of Smad2 and Smad3. Phosphorylated Smad2 and Smad3 form a complex with Smad4 to translocate to the nucleus and transcriptionally activate fibrogenic target genes such as collagen 1α1 (col1a1) and collagen 3α1 (col3a1) [42, 52]. Most studies have shown that metformin directly exerts antifibrotic effects by inhibiting TGF-β1 production and subsequently decreasing the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Smad2/3 [25, 34, 5355]. Additionally, some studies have found that metformin exerts antifibrotic effects by blocking the phosphorylation of Smad2/3 [22, 42, 54, 56]. Furthermore, metformin treatment and subsequent AMPK activation inhibited the phosphorylation and nuclear translocation of Smad3 [37]. Decreased reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation induced by metformin treatment modulates TGF-β1-induced Smad2/3 phosphorylation and myofibroblast differentiation [41, 57]. ROS-sensitive regulation of tyrosine kinases and protein tyrosine phosphatases accounts for a decrease in Smad2/3 phosphorylation [58]. Moreover, metformin has also been shown to directly interact with TGF-β1 at its receptor-binding domain, thus suppressing the binding of TGF-β1 to its receptor and resulting in decreased activity of downstream signaling [59]. However, some studies reported that metformin did not reduce TGF-β1-stimulated Smad3 phosphorylation but inhibited TGF-β1-stimulated gene transcription driven by Smad3 [6062]. P300/CREB-binding protein (CBP), which is a coactivator with intrinsic acetyltransferase activity, often cooperates with Smads to regulate the transcription of target genes and plays a pivotal role in the fibrotic responses of various cell types. Upon TGF-β1 stimulation, the interaction of Smad2/3 with P300/CBP induces acetylation in the N-terminal region of Smad2/3, which results in Smad-dependent gene transcription [6365]. Activated AMPK induced by AICAR or metformin competes with Smad3 for interaction with P300 and targets it for degradation through a proteasome-dependent pathway [61]. This AMPK-dependent degradation of P300 and decreased interaction between P300 and Smad3 accounts for the decreased acetylation and transcriptional activity of Smad3, which inhibits the TGF-β1-induced fibrogenic property of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). Additionally, active AMPK blocks Smad3-mediated transcription by promoting the translocation of AMPKα2 to the nucleus without inhibiting Smad3 phosphorylation or nuclear translocation [62].

3.1.2. Noncanonical TGF-β1 Signaling Pathways

(1) MAPK Signaling Pathways. In addition to canonical Smad-mediated transcription, TGF-β1 also activates other noncanonical signaling cascades, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathways, which mediate a variety of cellular responses, including cell cycle control, apoptosis, and differentiation [66]. MAPKs are a family of serine-threonine protein kinases, the most extensively studied of which are extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2), c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), and p38 kinases [66]. MAPK activation results in serine/threonine phosphorylation in the linker region or MH1 domain in R-Smads, leading to transcriptional activation of the collagen promoter and enhancement of collagen synthesis [52, 67, 68]. Some studies reported that metformin treatment resulted in inhibition of the phosphorylation and activity of ERK1/2, which is an important mechanism in preventing fibrotic progression [33, 34, 41, 42, 54, 55, 6971]. AMPK-mediated inhibition of ERK1/2 phosphorylation blocked cell cycle progression and decreased the number of S- and G2/M-phase fibroblasts, leading to inhibition of fibroblast proliferation, migration, and differentiation [42, 72]. Integrin is an important cell receptor that mediates ECM remodeling and plays a vital role in regulating the ERK signaling pathway. Metformin treatment can modify integrin expression, decrease ERK1/2 phosphorylation, and ameliorate the expression of ECM components [73]. Furthermore, metformin administration significantly inhibits TGF-β1-induced monocyte chemotactic protein-1 expression through BMP and activin membrane-bound inhibitor- (Bambi-) mediated suppression of MEK/ERK1/2 signaling in cultured rat renal tubular epithelial cells [74]. Moreover, activation of p38 MAPK and JNK is involved in the fibrosis process [66]. Metformin treatment could also decrease the activities of p38 MAPK and JNK, contributing to fibroblast resistance to apoptosis and aggravation of fibrosis [55, 75]. However, inconsistent with these studies, metformin administration did not change the activity of AMPK and p38 MAPK or the collagen levels in TGF-β1- or high glucose-treated cardiac fibroblasts [76].

(2) Wnt Signaling Pathways. Wnt signaling pathways, which were initially discovered as major regulators of carcinogenesis and embryonic development, have been reported to play critical roles in regulating fibrotic progression. Activation of canonical Wnt/β-catenin signaling phosphorylates and inactivates GSK-3β and results in mobilization of β-catenin into the nucleus, where it promotes the transcription of various fibrogenic genes, including fibronectin, Snail, and matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) [7779]. Metformin blocked the effect of TGF-β1 on the phosphorylation of GSK-3β and nuclear translocation of β-catenin and subsequently suppressed the transcription of Snail and MMP-7 [41]. This metformin-mediated inhibition of the Wnt signaling pathway contributes to restoring the expression of E-cadherin and reversing the epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) induced by TGF-β1 in human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Furthermore, metformin impedes the canonical Wnt axis and deregulates Wnt-regulated gene expression by directly inhibiting the expression of DVL-3 (a Wnt mediator), leading to delayed onset of EMT and impaired neural crest development [80]. It has also been reported that metformin inactivated GSK-3β by enhancing the activity of protein kinase B (PKB, also known as AKT) and then alleviated cardiac fibrosis in STZ-induced diabetic rats [75]. In addition, metformin has been observed to upregulate TGF-β pseudoreceptor Bambi expression and to promote the survival of quiescent HSCs by activating the Wnt signaling pathway [81].

(3) PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathways. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT is a critical signaling pathway in regulating glucose metabolism, proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation. It is involved in regulating the TGF-β1 pathway and plays an important role in regulating fibrosis by promoting the activation and proliferation of fibroblasts and ECM synthesis. Metformin blocked the fibrogenic response of HSCs induced by platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) by inhibiting the activities of AKT and its downstream target mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) [69]. Metformin treatment may attenuate the hyperglycemia-induced inhibition of the cardiac liver kinase B1/AMPK/AKT pathway, activate GSK3-β, and prevent diabetes-induced cardiomyopathy [75]. Decreased expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog deleted on chromosome ten (PTEN) and activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway in the kidneys of diabetic nephropathy mice were reversed by metformin treatment, which may lead to decreased expression of miR192 [82]. Additionally, metformin-induced inactivation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway has also been reported as a consequence of AMPK activation and subsequent decreased NADPH oxidase- (NOX-) dependent ROS production [83]. Metformin administration upregulated the expression of the regulatory subunits of PI3K PIK3r1 and p53, which in turn suppressed forkhead box-O3 expression and ameliorated radiation-induced skin fibrosis in mice [84]. However, metformin administration decreased the expression of PI3K in the liver but not in the lungs of common bile duct ligation rats, and this effect of metformin on PI3K expression was independent of AMPK activation [85]. Furthermore, inconsistent with other studies, decreased activity of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and enhanced endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis were observed in an intrauterine adhesion model, and metformin treatment reversed these changes and protected the endometrium from fibrosis after mechanical injury [70]. Restoration of the PTEN/PI3K/AKT signaling pathway and protective effects against myocardial fibrosis were also reported in metformin-treated T2DM mice [86].

(4) mTOR Signaling Pathways. mTOR is a highly conserved serine/threonine protein kinase in the PI3K-related kinase family and is well known to adjust fibrogenetic processes by regulating autophagy, inflammation, and fibroblast proliferation and differentiation [87]. mTOR activity has been reported to be reduced by metformin in an AMPK-dependent manner and to mediate antifibrotic effects [18, 29, 69, 88]. Upon AMPK-mediated mTOR inactivation, metformin treatment significantly enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis and reversed reprogrammed aerobic glycolysis, which in turn enhanced collagen turnover via autophagy, restored the cell sensitivity to intrinsic apoptosis, and finally accelerated the resolution of bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis [18]. Cardiomyocyte-secreted galectin 3 (Gal-3), which is a member of the β-galactoside-binding protein family, has been reported to mediate cardiac fibroblast activation and promote myocardial fibrosis [89]. Reduced expression of Gal-3 has been observed in cardiomyocytes in metformin-treated MI mice and led to ameliorated cardiac fibrosis after MI [29]. Decreased NOX4 activity and mitochondrial oxidative stress and inhibited protein kinase C α (PKCα) activity, which accounted for the effect of metformin on Gal-3 expression, may be a consequence of increased levels of TSC2 phosphorylation and subsequent inactivation of the mTOR-S6K signaling pathway [29]. However, metformin treatment did not show any effects on methionine-choline-deficient- (MCD-) induced increases in mTOR activity or the NASH phenotype, such as inflammation and collagen deposition, in NASH mice [90].

3.2. Metformin and ROS

ROS play an important role in regulating multiple cellular processes, including proliferation, differentiation, migration, and apoptosis. Oxidative stress, which is characterized by excessive ROS generation, is known to be a central mechanism involved in promoting fibrotic progression. AMPK is a suppressor of oxidative stress and is critical in regulating ROS production. As expected, metformin, as a defined AMPK activator, has also been observed to reduce ROS production and to suppress oxidative stress [29, 41, 55, 57, 83, 9194]. Decreased expression and activity of NOX, especially NOX4, accounts for decreased ROS production induced by metformin [29, 41, 57, 83, 92, 94]. Metformin was also reported to decrease mitochondrial ROS production by protecting mitochondria from TGF-β1-induced damage and upregulating the mitochondrial antioxidant system [41]. Furthermore, metformin decreased ROS generation with enhanced antioxidant activity by reducing malondialdehyde (MDA) expression and the glutathione (GSH/GSSG) ratio and upregulating the expression of antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase 2 (SOD2), heme oxygenase-1, and thioredoxin [41, 55, 83, 93, 94]. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator-1α (PGC-1α), which is a versatile transcriptional coactivator, has been reported to be upregulated by metformin in an AMPK-dependent manner and to be involved in regulating the expression of the mitochondrial antioxidant enzyme SOD2 and the nonmitochondrial antioxidant enzyme catalase [83]. Reduced ROS production may interfere with the TGF-β1 signaling pathway by directly regulating Smad2/3 activity [57]. Metformin has also been reported to attenuate PDGF-induced intracellular ROS production and the subsequent PI3K/AKT signaling pathway. Additionally, reduced ROS-mediated PKC inactivation is involved in the effect of metformin on suppressing the activation and proliferation of myofibroblasts and reducing ECM production [29, 91]. Two isoforms of PKC, PKCα and PKCε, have been reported as targets of metformin in its antifibrotic effect. Metformin treatment also suppressed oxidative stress-associated inflammatory factor release by downregulating the expression of the oxidative stress-response cytoplasmic adaptor molecule TRAF3 interacting protein 2 (TRAF3IP2), consequently reversing aldosterone+salt-induced cardiac fibrosis [92].

3.3. Metformin and Metabolism

Metabolic alterations, such as enhanced glycolysis and arginine metabolism, dysregulated fatty acid metabolism, and suppressed sphingolipid metabolism, have been observed during the pathogenesis of fibrosis and play key fundamental roles in regulating ECM homeostasis and fibrosis [95]. Reversing these metabolic alterations has emerged as a promising strategy to fight fibrosis.

Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC), as a target for energy-sensing AMPK, is the major controller of the rate of intracellular fatty acid metabolism [96]. It has been observed that phosphorylation of ACC1 at Ser79 and ACC2 at Ser212, both of which respond to activation of AMPK and are associated with decreased catalytic activity, was associated with higher de novo lipogenesis and lower fatty acid oxidation (FAO), as well as increased levels of fibrosis in the liver [96]. Metformin therapy, which led to AMPK activation, increased phosphorylation of ACC1 at Ser79 and reduced lipid accumulation and fibrosis in the kidneys from a UUO model [32]. This AMPK/ACC-dependent antifibrotic effect of metformin was also confirmed in a carbon tetrachloride-induced liver fibrosis model and abrogated the development of hepatocellular carcinoma [97]. However, inconsistent consequences were observed in patients with IPF [21]. Similarly, metformin treatment accelerated fibrosis resolution in cultured lung tissue from patients with IPF and in a bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis mouse model. However, unlike the antilipogenic effect mentioned above, metformin triggered the transdifferentiation of myofibroblasts into lipofibroblasts by enhancing the activity and expression of lipogenic markers such as peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) and PLIN2 and induced lipid droplet accumulation in human IPF fibroblasts. Interestingly, metformin-induced AMPK activation accounted for the suppression of myofibroblast marker COL1A1 expression but not the expression of lipogenic markers. These antifibrotic effects of metformin responded to upregulated BMP2 and PPARγ phosphorylation.

Succinate, which is an intermediate metabolite of the Krebs cycle, is converted to fumarate by succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and is recognized as an important signaling molecule in regulating ROS production, inflammation, fibrosis, etc. [98, 99]. Succinate accumulation has been reported in palmitate-stimulated HSCs and NAFLD mice induced by an MCD diet or a high-fat diet and is associated with HSC activation and NAFLD-associated liver fibrosis [100, 101]. Metformin therapy has been observed to reduce succinate accumulation by inhibiting the expression of SDH and to downregulate hypoxia-inducible transcription factor-1α (HIF-1α) expression and ameliorate liver fibrosis [100]. Along with decreasing succinate accumulation, metformin inhibited the expression of GPR91, which is the specific receptor of succinate [102], and subsequently ameliorated HSC activation and hepatic fibrosis [101].

3.4. Metformin and Mitochondrial Function

Many progresses of fibrosis, such as fibroblast activation, ECM synthesis, secretion, and degradation, require significant energy input, which is provided by the ATP generated from upregulated glycolysis and (FAO) [95]. It has been reported that metformin ameliorates high-fat diet-, palmitate-, and hypoxia-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress and HIF-1α expression and simultaneously inhibits adipose fibrosis. This may be attributed to decreased ATP production, limited oxygen consumption, and low oxygen tension and effectively prevented hypoxia in adipocytes [103]. A recent study reported that deficiency in AMPK activity, which was observed in fibroblasts from IPF, diminished basal oxygen consumption, the ATP-linked O2 consumption rate (OCR), maximal respiration, and the mitochondrial reserve capacity. Metformin treatment triggers mitochondrial biogenesis by upregulating mitochondrial transcription factor (TFAM) and induces the expression of the major components of mitochondrial ETC complexes, such as NDUFB8, 30 kDa FeS, core protein 2, C-IV subunit I, and the α subunit, in human lung fibroblasts [18].

4. Conclusion

Metformin has been an excellent first-line oral hypoglycemic agent for T2DM for many years. Its efficacy, safety, and cost benefits have been widely recognized. In addition to hypoglycemic effects, other potential indications for metformin have emerged. As mentioned above, metformin exerts potentially favorable effects in relation to the prevention and treatment of organ fibrosis. These properties have attracted an enormous amount of attention from researchers. Unfortunately, most of the above studies are preclinical, and to date, effective evidence of metformin as an antifibrotic agent in the clinic is insufficient. There may be several explanations for such a discrepancy. First, variations among different species may partly account for these inconsistent results. Different Smad proteins are involved in TGF-β1 signal transduction. Furthermore, a single mouse model cannot fully recapitulate the human disease state. Additionally, one main reason is that AMPK activation is only relevant to certain fibrosis phenotypes. Another reason for such a discrepancy in results may be due to the difference between doses used in experimental studies and those achieved in clinical trials. Such inconsistent data call for more in-depth, well-organized, randomized, and controlled clinical trials to investigate its efficacy in this indication.

In this review, we also discuss the mechanisms involved in the antifibrotic effect of metformin. As mentioned above, the canonical TGF-β1 signaling pathway is the main target pathway, and noncanonical TGF-β1 signaling pathways, such as the MAPK, Wnt, mTOR, and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways, are also involved. It has also been reported that metformin can ameliorate fibrosis by regulating mitochondrial function and improving oxidative stress. In these proposed mechanisms, AMPK activation plays an important role but is not dispensable in the antifibrotic effect of metformin (as shown in Table 1).


OrgansMechanisms
TGF-β1 signaling pathwaysOther signaling pathways
CanonicalNoncanonical
TGF-β1-SmadMAPKWntP13K-AKTmTORROSMetabolismMitochondrial function

Kidney34&, 56#, 6033&, 34&82&889432
Heart25#75#7575, 86&2929, 91&, 92
Lung54, 55, 5754, 551855, 57, 9318
Liver53&, 6169, 7281#69, 83, 85#698397, 100&, 101
Adipose3773&103#
Peritoneal41#41#41#41#
Peritendinous4242
Endometrium70&70&
Skin84

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Y.X. provided the scope of the research. M.W. conducted the literature review and drafted the initial draft and final version of the manuscript. H.X. jointly completed the final version of the manuscript. M.W. and X.T. finished the drawing. J.L., X.T., S.W., and M.G. revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. Y.L. and Y.X. instructed and reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version for submission to the journal. Maoyan Wu and Huiwen Xu should be considered joint first author.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 81970676), the Department of Science and Technology of Sichuan Province (grant numbers 2019YFS0537 and 2020YFS0456), and grants from the Luzhou-Southwest Medical University cooperation project (grant number 2018LZXNYD-PT01).

References

  1. R. Harris, D. J. Harman, T. R. Card, G. P. Aithal, and I. N. Guha, “Prevalence of clinically significant liver disease within the general population, as defined by non-invasive markers of liver fibrosis: a systematic review,” The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 288–297, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. Z. M. Younossi, A. B. Koenig, D. Abdelatif, Y. Fazel, L. Henry, and M. Wymer, “Global epidemiology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-meta-analytic assessment of prevalence, incidence, and outcomes,” Hepatology, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 73–84, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. B. Ley and H. R. Collard, “Epidemiology of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis,” Clinical Epidemiology, vol. 5, pp. 483–492, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Conrad, A. Judge, J. Tran et al., “Temporal trends and patterns in heart failure incidence: a population-based study of 4 million individuals,” Lancet, vol. 391, no. 10120, pp. 572–580, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. D. E. Furst, A. W. Fernandes, S. R. Iorga, W. Greth, and T. Bancroft, “Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis in a large US managed care population,” The Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 784–786, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. M. Fleming, G. P. Aithal, M. Solaymani-Dodaran, T. R. Card, and J. West, “Incidence and prevalence of cirrhosis in the United Kingdom, 1992-2001: a general population-based study,” Journal of Hepatology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 732–738, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. C. van Blijderveen, S. M. Straus, R. Zietse, B. H. Stricker, M. C. Sturkenboom, and K. M. Verhamme, “A population-based study on the prevalence and incidence of chronic kidney disease in the Netherlands,” International Urology and Nephrology, vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 583–592, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. V. Jha, G. Garcia-Garcia, K. Iseki et al., “Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives,” Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9888, pp. 260–272, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. C. J. Bailey, “Metformin: historical overview,” Diabetologia, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1566–1576, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group, “Long-term safety, tolerability, and weight loss associated with metformin in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study,” Diabetes Care, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 731–737, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. A. Leone, E. Di Gennaro, F. Bruzzese, A. Avallone, and A. Budillon, “New perspective for an old antidiabetic drug: metformin as anticancer agent,” Cancer Treatment and Research, vol. 159, pp. 355–376, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. Y. Kita, T. Takamura, H. Misu et al., “Metformin prevents and reverses inflammation in a non-diabetic mouse model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis,” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 9, article e43056, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. M. Valencia, A. Palacio, L. Tamariz, and H. Florez, “Metformin and ageing: improving ageing outcomes beyond glycaemic control,” Diabetologia, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1630–1638, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Pollak, “The effects of metformin on gut microbiota and the immune system as research frontiers,” Diabetologia, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1662–1667, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Foretz, B. Guigas, and B. Viollet, “Understanding the glucoregulatory mechanisms of metformin in type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Nature Reviews. Endocrinology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 569–589, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. I. Pernicova and M. Korbonits, “Metformin--mode of action and clinical implications for diabetes and cancer,” Nature Reviews. Endocrinology, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 143–156, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. Rena, D. G. Hardie, and E. R. Pearson, “The mechanisms of action of metformin,” Diabetologia, vol. 60, no. 9, pp. 1577–1585, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Rangarajan, N. B. Bone, A. A. Zmijewska et al., “Metformin reverses established lung fibrosis in a bleomycin model,” Nature Medicine, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1121–1127, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. X. Chen, F. J. Walther, R. M. Sengers et al., “Metformin attenuates hyperoxia-induced lung injury in neonatal rats by reducing the inflammatory response,” American journal of physiology Lung cellular and molecular physiology, vol. 309, no. 3, pp. L262–L270, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Gao, J. Yuan, Q. Wang et al., “Metformin protects against PM2.5-induced lung injury and cardiac dysfunction independent of AMP-activated protein kinase α2,” Redox Biology, vol. 28, p. 101345, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. V. Kheirollahi, R. M. Wasnick, V. Biasin et al., “Metformin induces lipogenic differentiation in myofibroblasts to reverse lung fibrosis,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 2987, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. Wang, Y. Wang, J. Han et al., “Metformin attenuates radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis in a murine model,” Radiation Research, vol. 188, no. 1, pp. 105–113, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Gundewar, J. W. Calvert, S. Jha et al., “Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase by metformin improves left ventricular function and survival in heart failure,” Circulation Research, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 403–411, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. H. Sasaki, H. Asanuma, M. Fujita et al., “Metformin prevents progression of heart failure in dogs: role of AMP-activated protein kinase,” Circulation, vol. 119, no. 19, pp. 2568–2577, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. H. Xiao, X. Ma, W. Feng et al., “Metformin attenuates cardiac fibrosis by inhibiting the TGFbeta1-Smad3 signalling pathway,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 504–513, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. X. Tang, X. F. Chen, N. Y. Wang et al., “SIRT2 acts as a cardioprotective deacetylase in pathological cardiac hypertrophy,” Circulation, vol. 136, no. 21, pp. 2051–2067, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. R. Chen, Y. Feng, J. Wu et al., “Metformin attenuates angiotensin II-induced TGFβ1 expression by targeting hepatocyte nuclear factor-4-α,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 175, no. 8, pp. 1217–1229, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. H. Kanamori, G. Naruse, A. Yoshida et al., “Metformin enhances autophagy and provides cardioprotection in delta-sarcoglycan deficiency-induced dilated cardiomyopathy,” Circulation. Heart Failure, vol. 12, article e005418, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  29. M. D. C. Asensio-Lopez, A. Lax, M. J. Fernandez Del Palacio, Y. Sassi, R. J. Hajjar, and D. A. Pascual-Figal, “Pharmacological inhibition of the mitochondrial NADPH oxidase 4/PKCα/Gal-3 pathway reduces left ventricular fibrosis following myocardial infarction,” Translational Research, vol. 199, pp. 4–23, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. V. Takiar, S. Nishio, P. Seo-Mayer et al., “Activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) slows renal cystogenesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 2462–2467, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. K. Tikoo, E. Sharma, V. R. Amara, H. Pamulapati, and V. S. Dhawale, “Metformin improves metabolic memory in high fat diet (HFD)-induced renal dysfunction,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 291, no. 42, pp. 21848–21856, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Lee, M. Katerelos, K. Gleich et al., “Phosphorylation of acetyl-CoA carboxylase by AMPK reduces renal fibrosis and is essential for the anti-fibrotic effect of metformin,” J Am Soc Nephrol, vol. 29, no. 9, pp. 2326–2336, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Shen, N. Miao, J. Xu et al., “Metformin prevents renal fibrosis in mice with unilateral ureteral obstruction and inhibits Ang II-induced ECM production in renal fibroblasts,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 17, no. 2, p. 146, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. H. Yi, C. Huang, Y. Shi et al., “Metformin attenuates folic-acid induced renal fibrosis in mice,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 233, no. 9, pp. 7045–7054, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. E. Neven, B. Vervaet, K. Brand et al., “Metformin prevents the development of severe chronic kidney disease and its associated mineral and bone disorder,” Kidney International, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 102–113, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. X. Lin, Y. Li, S. Liang et al., “Metformin attenuates cyclosporine A-induced renal fibrosis in rats,” Transplantation, vol. 103, no. 10, pp. e285–e296, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. T. Luo, A. Nocon, J. Fry et al., “AMPK activation by metformin suppresses abnormal extracellular matrix remodeling in adipose tissue and ameliorates insulin resistance in obesity,” Diabetes, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 2295–2310, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. A. Biondo, H. A. Batatinha, C. O. Souza et al., “Metformin mitigates fibrosis and glucose intolerance induced by doxorubicin in subcutaneous adipose tissue,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 9, p. 452, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. X. Zhang, C. Zhang, S. Shen et al., “Dehydroepiandrosterone induces ovarian and uterine hyperfibrosis in female rats,” Human Reproduction, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 3074–3085, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. F. Ursini, R. D. Grembiale, L. D'Antona et al., “Oral metformin ameliorates bleomycin-induced skin fibrosis,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 136, no. 9, pp. 1892–1894, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. H. S. Shin, J. Ko, D. A. Kim et al., “Metformin ameliorates the phenotype transition of peritoneal mesothelial cells and peritoneal fibrosis via a modulation of oxidative stress,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 5690, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. Zheng, J. Song, Y. Zhang, S. Chen, H. Ruan, and C. Fan, “Metformin prevents peritendinous fibrosis by inhibiting transforming growth factor-β signaling,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 60, pp. 101784–101794, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. C. W. McCloskey, D. P. Cook, B. S. Kelly et al., “Metformin abrogates age-associated ovarian fibrosis,” Clinical Cancer Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 632–642, 2020. View at: Google Scholar
  44. C. H. Tseng, “Metformin reduces ovarian cancer risk in Taiwanese women with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 619–626, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. E. Bugianesi, E. Gentilcore, R. Manini et al., “A randomized controlled trial of metformin versus vitamin E or prescriptive diet in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” The American Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 1082–1090, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. S. Nair, A. M. Diehl, M. Wiseman, G. H. Farr Jr., and R. P. Perrillo, “Metformin in the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: a pilot open label trial,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–28, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. V. Nobili, M. Manco, P. Ciampalini et al., “Metformin use in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: an open-label, 24-month, observational pilot study,” Clinical Therapeutics, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1168–1176, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. J. E. Lavine, J. B. Schwimmer, M. L. Van Natta et al., “Effect of vitamin E or metformin for treatment of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: the TONIC randomized controlled trial,” JAMA, vol. 305, no. 16, pp. 1659–1668, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. Z. Omer, S. Cetinkalp, M. Akyildiz et al., “Efficacy of insulin-sensitizing agents in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease,” European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 18–23, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. J. W. Haukeland, Z. Konopski, H. B. Eggesbo et al., “Metformin in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized, controlled trial,” Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 853–860, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. A. Uygun, A. Kadayifci, A. T. Isik et al., “Metformin in the treatment of patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis,” Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 537–544, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. R. Derynck and Y. E. Zhang, “Smad-dependent and Smad-independent pathways in TGF-beta family signalling,” Nature, vol. 425, no. 6958, pp. 577–584, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. K. Fan, K. Wu, L. Lin et al., “Metformin mitigates carbon tetrachloride-induced TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling and liver fibrosis in mice,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 90, pp. 421–426, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. L. Li, W. Huang, K. Li et al., “Metformin attenuates gefitinib-induced exacerbation of pulmonary fibrosis by inhibition of TGF-β signaling pathway,” Oncotarget, vol. 6, no. 41, pp. 43605–43619, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. N. Gamad, S. Malik, K. Suchal et al., “Metformin alleviates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in rats: pharmacological effects and molecular mechanisms,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 97, pp. 1544–1553, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. Y. Feng, S. Wang, Y. Zhang, and H. Xiao, “Metformin attenuates renal fibrosis in both AMPKα2-dependent and independent manners,” Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology & Physiology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 648–655, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. N. Sato, N. Takasaka, M. Yoshida et al., “Metformin attenuates lung fibrosis development via NOX4 suppression,” Respiratory Research, vol. 17, no. 1, p. 107, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. F. Jiang, G. S. Liu, G. J. Dusting, and E. C. Chan, “NADPH oxidase-dependent redox signaling in TGF-β-mediated fibrotic responses,” Redox Biology, vol. 2, pp. 267–272, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. H. Xiao, J. Zhang, Z. Xu et al., “Metformin is a novel suppressor for transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 28597, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. J. Lu, J. Shi, M. Li et al., “Activation of AMPK by metformin inhibits TGF-β-induced collagen production in mouse renal fibroblasts,” Life Sciences, vol. 127, pp. 59–65, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. J. Y. Lim, M. A. Oh, W. H. Kim, H. Y. Sohn, and S. I. Park, “AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits TGF-β-induced fibrogenic responses of hepatic stellate cells by targeting transcriptional coactivator p300,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 227, no. 3, pp. 1081–1089, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. R. Mishra, B. L. Cool, K. R. Laderoute, M. Foretz, B. Viollet, and M. S. Simonson, “AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits transforming growth factor-β-induced Smad3-dependent transcription and myofibroblast transdifferentiation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 283, no. 16, pp. 10461–10469, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. Y. Inoue, Y. Itoh, K. Abe et al., “Smad3 is acetylated by p300/CBP to regulate its transactivation activity,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 500–508, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. A. W. Tu and K. Luo, “Acetylation of Smad2 by the co-activator p300 regulates activin and transforming growth factor β response,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 29, pp. 21187–21196, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. A. K. Ghosh and J. Varga, “The transcriptional coactivator and acetyltransferase p300 in fibroblast biology and fibrosis,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 213, no. 3, pp. 663–671, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. N. Sakai and A. M. Tager, “Fibrosis of two: epithelial cell-fibroblast interactions in pulmonary fibrosis,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1832, pp. 911–921, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  67. T. Hayashida, M. Decaestecker, and H. W. Schnaper, “Cross-talk between ERK MAP kinase and Smad signaling pathways enhances TGF-beta-dependent responses in human mesangial cells,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1576–1578, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. T. Hayashida, A. C. Poncelet, S. C. Hubchak, and H. W. Schnaper, “TGF-beta1 activates MAP kinase in human mesangial cells: a possible role in collagen expression,” Kidney International, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 1710–1720, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Z. Li, Q. Ding, L. P. Ling et al., “Metformin attenuates motility, contraction, and fibrogenic response of hepatic stellate cells in vivo and in vitro by activating AMP-activated protein kinase,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 819–832, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. X. X. Xu, S. S. Zhang, H. L. Lin et al., “Metformin promotes regeneration of the injured endometrium via inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress-induced apoptosis,” Reproductive Sciences, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 560–568, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. S. C. Tang, L. Y. Chan, J. C. Leung, A. S. Cheng, H. Y. Lan, and K. N. Lai, “Additive renoprotective effects of B2-kinin receptor blocker and PPAR-gamma agonist in uninephrectomized db/db mice,” Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, vol. 91, pp. 1351–1362, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  72. A. Caligiuri, C. Bertolani, C. T. Guerra et al., “Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase modulates the activated phenotype of hepatic stellate cells,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 668–676, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. Z. Malekpour-Dehkordi, S. Teimourian, M. Nourbakhsh, Y. Naghiaee, R. Sharifi, and J. Mohiti-Ardakani, “Metformin reduces fibrosis factors in insulin resistant and hypertrophied adipocyte via integrin/ERK, collagen VI, apoptosis, and necrosis reduction,” Life Sciences, vol. 233, p. 116682, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. D. Liang, Z. Song, W. Liang, Y. Li, and S. Liu, “Metformin inhibits TGF-beta 1-induced MCP-1 expression through BAMBI-mediated suppression of MEK/ERK1/2 signalling,” Nephrology, vol. 24, pp. 481–488, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  75. N. T. Al-Damry, H. A. Attia, N. M. Al-Rasheed et al., “Sitagliptin attenuates myocardial apoptosis via activating LKB-1/AMPK/Akt pathway and suppressing the activity of GSK-3β and p38α/MAPK in a rat model of diabetic cardiomyopathy,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 107, pp. 347–358, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. S. Guo, X. W. Meng, X. S. Yang, X. F. Liu, C. H. Ou-Yang, and C. Liu, “Curcumin administration suppresses collagen synthesis in the hearts of rats with experimental diabetes,” Acta Pharmacologica Sinica, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 195–204, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. O. Burgy and M. Konigshoff, “The WNT signaling pathways in wound healing and fibrosis,” Matrix Biology, vol. 68-69, pp. 67–80, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. W. R. Henderson Jr., E. Y. Chi, X. Ye et al., “Inhibition of Wnt/beta-catenin/CREB binding protein (CBP) signaling reverses pulmonary fibrosis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 32, pp. 14309–14314, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. R. J. Tan, D. Zhou, L. Zhou, and Y. Liu, “Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and kidney fibrosis,” Kidney international supplements, vol. 4, pp. 84–90, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  80. P. Banerjee, S. Dutta, and R. Pal, “Dysregulation of Wnt-signaling and a candidate set of miRNAs underlie the effect of metformin on neural crest cell development,” Stem Cells, vol. 34, pp. 334–345, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  81. N. Subramaniam, M. H. Sherman, R. Rao et al., “Metformin-mediated Bambi expression in hepatic stellate cells induces prosurvival Wnt/beta-catenin signaling,” Cancer prevention research, vol. 5, pp. 553–561, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  82. S. Yu, H. Zhao, W. Yang et al., “The alcohol extract of Coreopsis tinctoria Nutt ameliorates diabetes and diabetic nephropathy in db/db mice through miR-192/miR-200b and PTEN/AKT and ZEB2/ECM pathways,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2019, Article ID 5280514, 12 pages, 2019. View at: Google Scholar
  83. M. Adachi and D. A. Brenner, “High molecular weight adiponectin inhibits proliferation of hepatic stellate cells via activation of adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase,” Hepatology, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 677–685, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. J. M. Kim, H. Yoo, J. Y. Kim et al., “Metformin alleviates radiation-induced skin fibrosis via the downregulation of FOXO3,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 959–970, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. M. T. Ko, H. C. Huang, W. S. Lee et al., “Metformin reduces intrahepatic fibrosis and intrapulmonary shunts in biliary cirrhotic rats,” Journal of the Chinese Medical Association, vol. 80, no. 8, pp. 467–475, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. N. Hou, Y. Mai, X. Qiu et al., “Carvacrol attenuates diabetic cardiomyopathy by modulating the PI3K/AKT/GLUT4 pathway in diabetic mice,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 10, p. 998, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. R. A. Saxton and D. M. Sabatini, “mTOR signaling in growth, metabolism, and disease,” Cell, vol. 168, no. 6, pp. 960–976, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. D. Dong, G. Y. Cai, Y. C. Ning et al., “Alleviation of senescence and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in aging kidney by short-term caloric restriction and caloric restriction mimetics via modulation of AMPK/mTOR signaling,” Oncotarget, vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 16109–16121, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. U. C. Sharma, S. Pokharel, T. J. van Brakel et al., “Galectin-3 marks activated macrophages in failure-prone hypertrophied hearts and contributes to cardiac dysfunction,” Circulation, vol. 110, no. 19, pp. 3121–3128, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. Mahzari, S. Li, X. Zhou et al., “Matrine protects against MCD-induced development of NASH via upregulating HSP72 and downregulating mTOR in a manner distinctive from metformin,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 10, p. 405, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. J. Bai, N. Zhang, Y. Hua et al., “Metformin inhibits angiotensin II-induced differentiation of cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 9, article e72120, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. S. Mummidi, N. A. Das, A. J. Carpenter et al., “Metformin inhibits aldosterone-induced cardiac fibroblast activation, migration and proliferation in vitro, and reverses aldosterone+salt-induced cardiac fibrosis in vivo,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 98, pp. 95–102, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. C. S. Park, B. R. Bang, H. S. Kwon et al., “Metformin reduces airway inflammation and remodeling via activation of AMP-activated protein kinase,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 84, no. 12, pp. 1660–1670, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. J. H. Lee, J. H. Kim, J. S. Kim et al., “AMP-activated protein kinase inhibits TGF-β-, angiotensin II-, aldosterone-, high glucose-, and albumin-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition,” American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology, vol. 304, no. 6, pp. F686–F697, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. X. Zhao, J. Y. Y. Kwan, K. Yip, P. P. Liu, and F. F. Liu, “Targeting metabolic dysregulation for fibrosis therapy,” Nature Reviews. Drug Discovery, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 57–75, 2020. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. M. D. Fullerton, S. Galic, K. Marcinko et al., “Single phosphorylation sites in Acc1 and Acc2 regulate lipid homeostasis and the insulin-sensitizing effects of metformin,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 1649–1654, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. R. C. Shankaraiah, E. Callegari, P. Guerriero et al., “Metformin prevents liver tumourigenesis by attenuating fibrosis in a transgenic mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma,” Oncogene, vol. 38, no. 45, pp. 7035–7045, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. M. P. Murphy and L. A. J. O'Neill, “Krebs cycle reimagined: the emerging roles of succinate and itaconate as signal transducers,” Cell, vol. 174, no. 4, pp. 780–784, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. D. C. Macias-Ceja, D. Ortiz-Masia, P. Salvador et al., “Succinate receptor mediates intestinal inflammation and fibrosis,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 178–187, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. L. She, D. Xu, Z. Wang et al., “Curcumin inhibits hepatic stellate cell activation via suppression of succinate-associated HIF-1α induction,” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, vol. 476, pp. 129–138, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. G. Nguyen, S. Y. Park, C. T. Le, W. S. Park, D. H. Choi, and E. H. Cho, “Metformin ameliorates activation of hepatic stellate cells and hepatic fibrosis by succinate and GPR91 inhibition,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 495, no. 4, pp. 2649–2656, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. W. He, F. J. Miao, D. C. Lin et al., “Citric acid cycle intermediates as ligands for orphan G-protein-coupled receptors,” Nature, vol. 429, no. 6988, pp. 188–193, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. X. Li, J. Li, L. Wang et al., “The role of metformin and resveratrol in the prevention of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α accumulation and fibrosis in hypoxic adipose tissue,” British Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 173, no. 12, pp. 2001–2015, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2021 Maoyan Wu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views2536
Downloads791
Citations

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.