Sirt1 Mediates Vitamin D Deficiency-Driven Gluconeogenesis in the Liver via mTorc2/Akt Signaling
As an active form of vitamin D (VD), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D3) is involved in the development of many metabolic diseases, such as diabetes, autoimmune diseases, and tumours. While prospective epidemiological studies have consistently implicated VD deficiency in the regulation of glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity, the specific mechanism remains unclear. Here, we generated 1α(OH)ase-null mice (targeted ablation of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D 1α hydroxylase enzyme) and found that these mice developed hepatic glucose overproduction, glucose intolerance, and hepatic insulin resistance accompanied by reduced Sirtuin 1 (Sirt1) expression. The chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and a luciferase reporter assay revealed that 1,25(OH)2D3-activated VD receptor (VDR) directly interacted with one VD response element (VDRE) in the Sirt1 promoter to upregulate Sirt1 transcription, triggering a cascade of serine/threonine kinase (AKT) phosphorylation at S473 and FOXO1 phosphorylation at S256. This phosphorylation cascade reduced the expression of gluconeogenic genes, eventually attenuating glucose overproduction in the liver. In addition, a signaling pathway was found to modulate gluconeogenesis involving VDR, Sirt1, Rictor (a component of mTOR complex 2 [mTorc2]), AKT, and FOXO1, and Sirt1 and FOXO1 were identified as key modulators of dysregulated gluconeogenesis due to VD deficiency.
Type 2 diabetes is caused by a combination of genetic and environmental factors. Long-term observational studies have consistently linked vitamin D (VD) deficiency or VD receptor (VDR) gene polymorphism to impaired glucose metabolism [1–4], although Pittas et al. reported in 2019 that extra VD supplementation did not contribute to the prevention of diabetes regardless of the baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level . In addition to the small amount of VD absorbed by the intestine, the main source of VD is synthesis in the skin. VD forms 25-hydroxyvitamin D under the action of 25-hydroxylase in the liver, which is then converted into the active form of VD, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 [1,25(OH)2D3], by the action of the 1α-hydroxylase enzyme in the kidney. 1,25(OH)2D3, a nuclear hormone, modulates gene transcription and exerts its effects through directly binding its receptor, VDR, which forms a complex with the retinoic acid receptor (RXR) to act on various VD response elements (VDREs) located in the DNA promoter . Type 2 diabetes is primarily characterized by abnormal hepatic gluconeogenesis and insulin resistance; nevertheless, the mechanism by which VD regulates gluconeogenesis under physiological conditions should be further investigated.
FOXO1, a transcription factor primarily regulated through its phosphorylation on multiple residues, plays important roles in the modulation of gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis through insulin/Akt signaling [7, 8]. Feeding can invoke insulin signaling in the liver by activating the phosphorylation of serine/threonine kinase (AKT) and downstream FOXO1, which results in the exclusion of FOXO1 from the nucleus, inducing the suppression of fasting-induced transcription of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6Pase) and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PCK1), thus reducing gluconeogenesis . FOXO1 has been reported to mediate VD deficiency-induced insulin resistance in the skeletal muscle ; however, the mechanistic links between VD signaling, gluconeogenesis, and insulin resistance in the liver remain unclear. The enzyme Sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) which is a member of the sirtuin protein family is responsible for deacetylating the proteins critical for cellular regulation [11, 12], and its gain of function increases energy efficiency and prevents diabetes in mice . It has been reported that liver-specific deletion of Sirt1 upregulates the expression of G6Pase and PCK1 by impairing the mTorc2/AKT/FOXO1 pathway and thus increases hepatic glucose production and chronic hyperglycaemia . Our preliminary experiments revealed that 1,25(OH)2D3-deficient mice had downregulated expression of Sirt1. However, whether VD deficiency affects gluconeogenesis and insulin resistance in the liver through regulating Sirt1 expression and AKT/FOXO1 signaling remains unclear.
Here, we investigated the impact of 1,25(OH)2D3 deficiency on the gluconeogenesis with deletion of 1α(OH)ase in vivo and in VDR-knockdown HepG2 cells in vitro. Our results indicated that 1,25(OH)2D3 positively regulated the expression of Sirt1, an important deacetylase engaged in modulating glucose and lipid metabolism, by binding to its receptor, VDR. Reduced Sirt1 levels in 1α(OH)ase-/- mice downregulated the expression of Rictor, a key component of the mTorc2 complex, impaired the phosphorylation of AKT at S473 and FOXO1 at S256, and increased the expression of G6pase and PCK1, which resulted in hepatic glucose overproduction, hepatic insulin resistance, and, eventually, chronic hyperglycaemia.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Animals and Treatments
The strain of all mice used in our study was C57BL/6J. The 1α(OH)ase-/- mice were generated and characterized as previously described by Panda et al. . Age- and sex-matched 1α(OH)ase-/-, 1α(OH)ase-/-Sirt1Tg, and wild-type (WT) littermates were randomly divided into four groups (>10 mice per group). To avoid the effects of hormones, all the mice used in this study were male. After weaning, male WT, 1α(OH)ase-/-, and 1α(OH)ase-/-Sirt1Tg mice were divided into one of the following different groups: (1) WT mice were fed with a rescue diet (RD) (containing 2.0% calcium, 1.25% phosphorus, and 20% lactose), (2) 1α(OH)ase-/- mice were fed with a RD, (3) 1α(OH)ase-/- mice were fed with a normal diet (ND) (containing 1.0% calcium and 0.67% phosphorus) and subcutaneously injected with 1,25(OH)2D3 (Sigma, #705942, the normal diet plus three weekly subcutaneous injections of 1,25(OH)2D3 at a dose of 1 μg/kg per mouse), and (4) 1α(OH)ase-/-Sirt1Tg mice were fed with a RD. All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of Nanjing Medical University.
2.2. Measurements of Serum Calcium and Phosphorus Levels
Serum calcium and phosphorus levels were analysed with an autoanalyser (Hitachi 7180, Japan) using corresponding kits from MedicalSystem Biotechnology Co., Ltd.
2.3. Glucose Measurement
The mice were maintained under feeding or fasting conditions. The blood glucose level in the experiments was measured with a glucose meter (Bayer) and corresponding glucose test strips (Bayer).
2.4. Pyruvate Tolerance Test (PTT)/Glucose Tolerance Test (GTT)
After fasting for 16 hours, the body weight and blood glucose level were measured, and 20% pyruvate (PTT, Sigma, #792500)/20% glucose (GTT) was injected into each mouse i.p. at 100 μL/10 g body weight. The blood glucose level was monitored with a glucose meter at 15- or 30-minute intervals over 2 hours. Meanwhile, the blood was collected at 0, 15, and 120 minutes after glucose injection during the GTT, and the insulin level was measured.
2.5. Insulin Tolerance Test (ITT)
After measuring the body weight and glucose level, insulin was injected into each mouse fasting for 4 hours i.p. at 0.8 μL/kg body weight. The blood glucose level was measured as in GTT/PTT.
2.6. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay
Mouse serum 1,25(OH)2D3 and insulin levels were assayed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay with a mouse 1,25(OH)2D3 ELISA kit (Cusabio, #CSE-E1369m) and rat/mouse insulin ELISA kit (Millipore, #EZRMI-13K) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.7. Cell Culture
HepG2 human hepatoma cells obtained from Cobioer Biosciences (Nanjing, China) were cultured in high-glucose Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) (Gibco, Carlsbad, CA, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), 100 IU/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.
2.8. RNAi Transfection
Control siRNA (si-NC) and si-VDR (si-VDR1, si-VDR2) for VDR knockdown were purchased from the GenePharma Company (Shanghai, China). The siRNA target sequence was 5-GUGCCAUUGAGGUCAUCAUTT-3. Cells were plated in 6-well plates and grown to a cell density of 70%. Then, transient transfection was performed using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Invitrogen, #13778-075) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
2.9. VD and SRT1720 HCL Treatment
HepG2 cells were grown with high-glucose DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) in the absence or presence of 10-7 M 1,25(OH)2D3 (Sigma-Aldrich, #705942) for 48 hours. In addition, after transfection for 48 hours, HepG2 cells were maintained with high-glucose DMEM containing 10% FBS in the presence of 100 nM SRT1720 HCL (a selective SIRT1 activator, Selleck, #S1129) for another 6 hours for a subsequent glucose production assay with the supernatant.
2.10. Glucose Production Assay
HepG2 cells were cultured for 48 hours, washed in PBS to remove glucose, and then incubated in glucose production buffer [2 mM pyruvate and 20 mM lactate (Sigma, #1614308) in PBS]. Then, 100 nM insulin was added to the culture and incubated for 30 minutes before the samples were collected. Afterwards, glucose concentrations were measured 6 hours later with a glucose assay kit (Invitrogen, #A22189). The glucose concentration was calculated based on the difference between cells cultured in lactate/pyruvate-free medium and those cultured in pyruvate/lactate-supplemented medium.
2.11. Western Blotting
Western blotting was carried out with Tiangen using antibodies against VDR (Proteintech, #67192-1-Ig), Sirt1 (Cell Signaling Technology, #9475), Rictor (Cell Signaling Technology,#9476), FOXO1 (Cell Signaling Technology, #2880), FOXO1 phosphorylated at S256 (Cell Signaling Technology, #84192), AKT (Cell Signaling Technology), AKT phosphorylated at S473 (Cell Signaling Technology, #4060), G6pase (Bioss, #bs-4044R), PCK1 (Abcam, ab70358), and GAPDH (Proteintech, #60004-1-Ig). Immunoprecipitation was carried out according to standard procedures.
Immunohistochemical staining for FOXO1 phosphorylated at S256, AKT phosphorylated at S473, and Sirt1 was carried out using the avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex technique with antibodies against FOXO1 phosphorylated at S256 (Cell Signaling Technology, #84192), AKT phosphorylated at S473 (Cell Signaling Technology, #4060), and Sirt1 (Abcam, #ab189494).
2.13. Quantitative Real-Time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Total RNA was isolated from liver tissues or HepG2 cells with a TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, #12183555). cDNA was synthesized using the PrimeScript RT reagent (Takara, #639506) reverse transcription kit. Quantitative RT-PCR was performed using the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, #4309155) and analysed using the ABI 7500 real-time PCR system. The primers used are shown in supplemental Table 1.
2.14. Luciferase Assay
The plasmids of Luc-SIRT1 and VDR overexpression were transfected into 293T cells. Two VDR binding sites and one RXR binding site on SIRT1 and their corresponding characteristic binding motif were used for point mutation design. The plasmids of Luc-SIRT1-mut1, Luc-SIRT1-mut2, and Luc-SIRT1-mut3 were amplified by PCR using the Neb Q5 point mutation method. The plasmids of Luc-SIRT1 and VDR overexpression or VDR siRNA were transfected into 293T cells and so were the Luc-Sirt1-mut1, Luc-Sirt1-mut2, and Luc-Sirt1-mut3 plasmids with the VDR overexpression plasmid. After incubation for forty-eight hours, the luciferase activity was evaluated with the dual-luciferase assay system (Promega, #E2920). The primers used in this assay are shown in supplemental Table 2.
2.15. Chromatin Immunoprecipitation- (ChIP-) qPCR Assay
HepG2 cells treated with 10-7 M 1,25(OH)2D3 and cultured for 24 hours were collected and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde (Sigma) for 15 minutes, and ChIP was performed with anti-VDR (Proteintech, #67192-1-Ig) antibody. qRT-PCR was performed as previously described. The primers used in this qPCR assay are shown in supplemental Table 3.
2.16. Statistical Analyses
Student’s -test was used to compare differences between the analysed samples. A value of was considered statistically significant. Data are expressed as . GraphPad Prism 6.0 was applied to draw graphs.
3.1. The Role of High Calcium and Phosphorus Dietary Supplementation in Correcting Hypocalcemia Caused by 1,25(OH)2D3 Deficiency
The levels of serum calcium, phosphate, and 1,25(OH)2D3 in 1α(OH)ase-/- mice fed with a ND were significantly lower than those in their WT littermates. To rule out the possible influence of hypocalcaemia on glucose homeostasis, a RD rich in calcium and phosphorus was used to feed WT and 1α(OH)ase-/- mice until 6 months of age. No significant changes were found in the serum calcium or phosphorus levels (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)), while serum 1,25(OH)2D3 was undetectable in the 1α(OH)ase-/- mice (Figure 1(c)). These results suggest that a high calcium phosphorus diet can correct hypocalcemia caused by deficiency of active vitamin D, excluding the influence of this factor on the development and progression of glucose metabolism disorder induced by deficiency of active vitamin D.
3.2. 1,25(OH)2D3 Deficiency Increased Hepatic Gluconeogenesis
To clarify the role of VD in glucose metabolism, the blood glucose levels were detected and results showed markedly higher blood glucose level in the 1α(OH)ase-/- mice than in WT littermates under both feeding and fasting conditions (Figure 2(a)). Subsequently, a PTT was performed to elucidate whether the elevated blood glucose level in 1α(OH)ase-/- mice was caused by glucose overproduction in the liver. The results showed that 1α(OH)ase-/- mice displayed higher blood glucose levels after pyruvate administration (Figure 2(b)). Consistently, the expression of G6pase and PCK1, two gluconeogenetic genes, showed a 2- to 3-fold increase at both mRNA and protein levels (Figures 2(c) and 2(d)). 1α(OH)ase-/- mice also displayed glucose intolerance during the GTT (Figure 2(e)). However, we did not find a significant difference in insulin secretion between 1α(OH)ase-/- mice and their WT littermates during the GTT (Figure 2(f)). Consistently, HepG2 cells with VDR knockdown (Figure 2(g)) produced approximately 2-folds more glucose than control cells (Figure 2(h)). The mRNA and protein expression levels of G6Pase and PCK1 also significantly increased in the VDR-knockdown group (Figures 2(i) and 2(j)). Taken together, these results demonstrate that hepatic gluconeogenesis can be enhanced by 1,25(OH)2D3 deficiency or the knockdown of its receptor.
3.3. 1,25(OH)2D3 Deficiency Increased Gluconeogenesis and Hepatic Insulin Resistance Potentially through Impairing the Phosphorylation of AKT and FOXO1
The liver’s response to insulin is essential in suppressing glucose production by lowering down the transcription of PCK1 and G6pase after a meal under normal physiological condition [16, 17]. To clarify whether 1α(OH)ase deletion would reduce insulin sensitivity, an ITT was performed, but results showed no difference in the decline in glucose levels upon insulin injection between 1α(OH)ase-/- mice and control mice (Figure 3(a)), indicative of normal peripheral insulin responsiveness in 1α(OH)ase-/- mice. Insulin has been shown to repress most hepatic genes, which is mostly mediated through a phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway [18–20]. To further test hepatic insulin sensitivity, the control and mutant animals that had been fasted for 6 hours were treated with insulin, and their livers were collected 30 minutes later. Results showed insulin markedly stimulated the phosphorylation of AKT at S473 in WT mouse livers but failed to do so in the mutant ones, as measured by Western blotting (Figure 3(b)) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) (Figure 3(c)), suggesting hepatic insulin resistance in 1α(OH)ase-/- mice. Meanwhile, HepG2 cells transfected with si-VDR also failed to exhibit insulin-mediated activation of AKT/FOXO1 signaling in vitro (Figure 3(d)).
Given the above findings, the mechanism by which AKT regulates the expression of G6pase and PCK1 was further investigated. AKT modulates gluconeogenesis via directly phosphorylating FOXO1 at S256, causing its nuclear exclusion [21, 22]. Figures 3(b) and 3(c) showed a dramatically reduced expression of p-FOXO1 S256 in the livers of 1α(OH)ase-/- mice as compared to WT mice (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)). Consistently, insulin-induced phosphorylation of FOXO1 at S256 was also reduced in the HepG2 cells with VDR deletion as compared to control HepG2 cells, as revealed by Western blotting (Figure 3(d)).
In the livers of 1α(OH)ase-deletion mice, reduced phosphorylation of FOXO1 at S256 suggests increased activity of FOXO1, which has been proven to be able to enhance the transcription of G6pase and Pepck genes [23, 24]. In HepG2 cells, the ectopic expression of FOXO1 activated the PCK1 promoter using a luciferase reporter construct for the PCK1 gene (Figure 3(e)). Consistent with the above findings showing that 1,25(OH)2D3 deficiency enhances the activity of FOXO1, the ablation of VDR by siRNA, together with the overexpression of FOXO1, synergistically enhanced the above effect (Figure 3(e)). Together with our finding that the transcription of G6pase and PCK1 increased in the 1,25(OH)2D3-deficient mouse livers, we speculate that the activation of FOXO1 was responsible for the glucose overproduction observed in the livers of 1α(OH)ase-knockout mice. Thus, it can be concluded that impaired VD signaling may induce hepatic gluconeogenesis and hepatic insulin resistance through attenuating the activity of the AKT/FOXO1 axis.
3.4. Sirt1 Mediated the Effects of 1,25(OH)2D3 Deficiency on AKT/FOXO1 Signaling and Dysregulation of Glucose Metabolism through Affecting Rictor Transcription
The potential mechanisms through which 1,25(OH)2D3 regulates AKT/FOXO1 activity was further explored. Sirt1 is known to positively regulate the AKT/FOXO1 signaling pathway . We identified three VDREs in different regions of the Sirt1 promoter by bioinformatics analysis (Figure 4(a)); thus, we investigated whether VD could change Sirt1 activity at the transcriptional level in the liver. Both the mRNA and protein expression levels of Sirt1 in the livers of 1α(OH)ase-/- mice were downregulated as compared to those in WT littermates (Figures 4(b)–4(d)), and similar results were observed in HepG2 cells in which VDR had been silenced (Figures 4(e) and 4(f)). Previous studies have shown that Rictor, an integral component of the mTorc2 complex, can negatively regulate hepatic glucose production and that AKT can be phosphorylated at S473 by the mTorc2 complex in response to stimulation of growth factor [25, 26]. As shown in the study of Wang et al., SIRT1 controls the expression of Rictor through interaction with NRF1 on the NRF1-binding sites of Rictor promoter, thus modulating glucose metabolism and insulin sensitivity through the AKT/FOXO1 axis . Thus, whether Rictor takes part in the regulation of attenuated activity of the AKT/FOXO1 pathway in the livers of 1,25(OH)2D3-deficient mice was further investigated. Results showed that both the mRNA and protein expressions of Rictor were markedly downregulated in the livers of 1α(OH)ase-/- mice as compared to their WT littermates (Figures 4(g) and 4(h)); a consistent trend regarding Rictor expression was also observed in HepG2-si-VDR cells (Figures 4(i) and 4(j)). Meanwhile, the mTOR2 protein expression showed no difference between the above groups, implying Rictor functions as the effective unit. To further test the role of Sirt1 in this axis, we bred 1α(OH)ase-/-Sirt1Tg mice to specify whether overexpression of Sirt1 could normalize the glucose intolerance observed in 1α(OH)ase-/- mice. In comparison to those from 1α(OH)ase-/- mice, the liver samples of 1α(OH)ase-/-Sirt1Tg mice showed increased Sirt1 and Rictor protein expression (Figure 5(c)), and the tolerance of 1α(OH)ase-/-Sirt1Tg mice to pyruvic acid stimulation (Figure 5(a)) and glucose (Figure 5(b)) was partially improved, as revealed by the PTT and GTT. Meanwhile, 1α(OH)ase-/-Sirt1Tg mouse livers exhibited enhanced pAKT-S473 and pFOXO1-S256 expression in response to insulin compared to that in the livers of 1α(OH)ase-/- mice (Figure 5(d)), suggesting that overexpression of Sirt1 restored the impaired hepatic insulin signaling pathway induced by 1,25(OH)2D3 deficiency in vivo.
In addition, Figure 5(e) shows a marked elevation in Sirt1 expression in HepG2 cells treated with 100 nM SRT1720HCL for 6 hours compared to control cells (Figure 5(e)). Therefore, HepG2 cells were treated with 100 nM SRT1720HCL, and the changes in pyruvate- and lactate-stimulated glucose production and related gene expression were observed. Consistent with the results observed in animals, the administration of SRT1720HCL enhanced the expression of Rictor as well as the FOXO1 target genes G6pase and PCK1, as measured by qRT-PCR (Figure 5(g)) and Western blotting (Figure 5(h)). Meanwhile, increased insulin-stimulated phosphorylation of AKT at S473 and FOXO1 at S256 (Figure 5(i)) and reduced pyruvate- and lactate-stimulated glucose production were also observed in the HepG2 cells treated with SRT1720HCL (Figure 5(f)). Thus, these findings demonstrate that Sirt1 and downstream Rictor are required for VD-mediated induction of FOXO1 nuclear exclusion to control hepatic gluconeogenesis and glucose metabolism.
3.5. VDR Positively Regulated the Expression of Sirt1 through Binding to the VDRE in the SIRT1 Promoter
1,25(OH)2D3, a nuclear hormone, regulates gene transcription and exerts its effects through binding its receptor, VDR . To determine whether VD exerts its effect through binding its receptor to directly modulate Sirt1 expression, a luciferase reporter gene assay was performed and results showed that VDR overexpression significantly enhanced the activity of the Sirt1 promoter while VDR ablation by siRNA conversely inhibited it, indicating a positive regulation between VDR and Sirt1 (Figures 6(a) and 6(b)). As three VDREs were identified in different regions of the Sirt1 promoter by bioinformatics analysis, we next explored which one functions mostly. After site-specific mutation of VDR and RXR binding sites in Sirt1 promoter region, VDR overexpression could still significantly enhance the level of the Sirt1-mut3 promoter but had no significant enhancement effect on the level of Sirt1-mut1 and Sirt1-mut2 promoter (in VDR) (Figure 6(b)), indicating that the mut3 sequence (in RXR) is not a functional region. Meanwhile, a ChIP-qPCR assay in HepG2 cells verified that VDR was physically enriched at the Sirt1 promoter region (Figure 6(c)). Thus, the above findings suggest that VDR positively regulates the expression of Sirt1 at the transcriptional level through binding to the VDRE in the SIRT1 promoter. According to the above findings, either 1,25(OH)2D3 deficiency or inhibition of VDR leads to the impairment of the Sirt1-mTOR2-AKT/FOXO1 signaling pathway both in vivo and in vitro. Thus, to the best of our knowledge, these findings for the first time show that Sirt1, a target gene of VDR, directly mediates the influence of impaired VD signaling on the hepatic glucose production and insulin sensitivity.
3.6. Supplementation with 1,25(OH)2D3 Reversed the Phenotype of 1α(OH)ase-/- Mice
Subsequently, 1,25(OH)2D3 to 1α(OH)ase-/- mice with administered with 1,25(OH)2D3 to explore whether supplementation with 1,25(OH)2D3 could reverse the glucose metabolism phenotype of the 1,25(OH)2D3-deficient mice. The GTT and PTT revealed an improvement in the response to pyruvic acid (Figure 5(a)) or glucose (Figure 5(b)) stimulation. Western blotting revealed that the administration of 1,25(OH)2D3 enhanced VDR and Sirt1 expression in the livers of 1α(OH)ase-/- mice fed with a ND; furthermore, Rictor expression was significantly upregulated, while the expression of key gluconeogenesis genes G6Pase and PCK1 was markedly downregulated as compared to their levels in the 1α(OH)ase-/- littermates on a RD (Figure 5(c)). In addition, insulin failed to phosphorylate AKT at S473 and FOXO1 at S256 in the livers of 1α(OH)ase-/- mice but could do so in the livers of 1α(OH)ase-/- mice supplemented with 1,25(OH)2D3 (Figure 5(d)), suggesting that 1,25(OH)2D3 administration improved the impaired hepatic insulin signaling pathway. Consistently, in HepG2 cells treated with 1,25(OH)2D3, qRT-PCR (Figure 5(g)) and Western blotting (Figure 5(h)) also revealed the reduced expression of FOXO1 target genes G6pase and PCK1. Meanwhile, insulin-stimulated levels of AKT phosphorylated at S473 and FOXO1 phosphorylated at S256 (Figure 5(i)) increased and pyruvate-stimulated glucose production significantly reduced (Figure 5(f)). The above observations demonstrate that enhanced VDR signaling by 1,25(OH)2D3 promotes FOXO1 phosphorylation and nuclear exclusion in the hepatocytes through positively regulating SIRT1 expression and subsequently activating the mTOR2-AKT/FOXO1 pathway (Figure 7).
Epidemiological investigations have clearly shown that VD deficiency is positively correlated with the occurrence and progression of the metabolic syndrome . However, the specific mechanism by which 1,25(OH)2D3 deficiency causes hyperglycaemia and insulin resistance remains elusive. Abnormal hepatic glucose production has been implicated as a major contributor to several human diseases, such as liver cirrhosis, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes. Furthermore, Sirt1 activity in the liver affects gluconeogenesis and insulin resistance . However, whether VD-deficient signaling in the liver increases gluconeogenesis and insulin resistance or triggers the dysregulation of Sirt1 activity is unknown. Our results showed that 1α(OH)ase-/- mice had enhanced gluconeogenesis and hepatic insulin resistance and decreased expression of Sirt1 in the liver. In contrast, enhanced VDR signaling by 1,25(OH)2D3 upregulated Sirt1 expression in the 1α(OH)-/- mice and HepG2 cells. The VD3-dependent activation of Sirt1 expression disappeared when VDR was knocked down. These results suggest that Sirt1 is a major target that mediates 1α(OH)ase-null signaling in the liver. Administration of Sirt1 agonist SRT1720 HCL normalized the gluconeogenesis and hepatic insulin sensitivity and prevented the glucose and pyruvate intolerance that occurred in 1α(OH)ase-/- mice. These novel findings indicate that suppression of Sirt1 expression in the liver may be responsible for the enhanced gluconeogenesis, hepatic insulin resistance, and impaired glucose metabolism in the 1α(OH)ase-/- mice.
Hepatic insulin signaling plays a key role in the gluconeogenesis and glucose metabolism. FOXO1 is a critical target that mediates VDR signaling in the skeletal muscle . Under physiological conditions, insulin inhibits FOXO1 activity by activating the insulin receptor (IR)/phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway, which induces the phosphorylation of FOXO1 and its transportation to the cytoplasm and degradation, reducing G6Pase and PCK1 expression, diminishing hepatic glucose production, and elevating glycogen synthesis [9, 29, 30]. However, in the case of VD deficiency, the expression of gluconeogenesis-related genes G6pase and PCK1 increased in the 1,25(OH)2D3-deficient mice and HepG2 cells with VDR knockdown, demonstrating that impaired VD signaling (1α(OH)ase deletion or VDR knockdown) may increase hepatic gluconeogenesis and thus result in hyperglycaemia. In addition, our results indicate a significant decrease in the phosphorylation of AKT (S473) and FOXO1 (S256) in the livers of 1α(OH)ase-/- mice, increasing FOXO1 accumulation in the nucleus and enhancing the expression of downstream PCK1 and G6Pase. Our results clearly show that 1,25(OH)2D3 negatively regulates FOXO1 expression and activity in the liver (Figure 3). 1,25(OH)2D3 activates the AKT/FOXO1 axis, providing evidence of a mechanism linking gluconeogenesis to FOXO1.
Several studies have shown that decreased insulin/PI3K/AKT signaling inhibits FOXO1 phosphorylation at the three sites (T24, S256, and S319), enhancing the subsequent nuclear translocation and activity of FOXO1, inducing insulin resistance . The VD- and insulin-mediated pathways converge on AKT, working together to promote AKT phosphorylation at S473 and subsequent FoxO1 phosphorylation at S256. As shown in Figure 3(b), 1α(OH)ase-/- mice had impaired AKT phosphorylation under insulin treatment. However, as shown in Figure 3(a), the ITT failed to show a significant difference in insulin tolerance between WT and KO mice, which indicates that the impairment of insulin-induced AKT phosphorylation in 1α(OH)ase-/- mice fails to affect insulin activity. In addition, no abnormalities in serum insulin levels were detectable in the normal and mutant groups, suggesting that the enhanced hepatic gluconeogenesis induced by 1,25(OH)2D3 deficiency may not cause whole-body insulin resistance in mice aged 6 months; however, we cannot exclude the possibility that skeletal muscle and adipose tissues will also exhibit insulin resistance similar to that in the liver as the 1,25(OH)2D3-deficient mice grow older. Studies that investigate the biological mechanism by which VD modulates hepatic gluconeogenesis free from insulin are ongoing.
Previous studies have shown that Sirt1, an important gene that regulates glucose and lipid metabolism, can regulate the levels of AKT/FOXO1 phosphorylation through the mediation of Rictor [14, 31]. Given that 1,25(OH)2D3 deficiency downregulated the expression of Sirt1 and Rictor, we further bred 1α(OH)ase-/-Sirt1Tg mice and found that the tolerance to glucose and pyruvic acid of these mice was improved as compared to that of WT littermates, suggesting restored glucose metabolism and reduced glucose production. Notably, the activation of the VD signaling pathway by 1,25(OH)2D3 or the upregulation of Sirt1 through Sirt1Tg or chemical activation by a Sirt1 agonist (SRT1720 HCL) normalized the glucose overproduction and glucose metabolism in vivo and in vitro through upregulating the AKT phosphorylation at S473 and FOXO1 phosphorylation at S256, leading to reduced expression of PCK1 and G6Pase. However, it remains to be elucidated whether impaired VD/VDR signaling inhibits Sirt1 transcription by direct binding to VDR elements in the Sirt1 promoter, indirect binding to DNA via some contiguous transcription factors, or indirect modulation of other genes.
VDR, a member of the nuclear receptor superfamily, can regulate gene transcription by binding VD-responsive elements in the promoter region of target genes. In most cases, VDR and RXR form a complex that serves to positively regulate gene expression . Therefore, a VDR ChIP assay was performed on the Sirt1 promoter regions, and results showed VDR enrichment in the VDRE of Sirt1 promoter and confirmed the positive regulation between VDR and Sirt1, demonstrating that VDR can directly regulate Sirt1 gene expression at the transcriptional level. Meanwhile, our findings showed that VDR was bound to the VDRE in the Sirt1 promoter and enhanced Sirt1 transcription, which are consistent with the positive role of VDR in gene expression. Study has reported that young liver-specific Sirt1-knockout mice suffer from hyperglycaemia and gradually develop an impaired insulin response as they grow up, finally exhibiting whole-body insulin resistance [33–37]. Consistent with these results, our study indicated that 1,25(OH)2D3 deletion negatively regulated the mTOR2/AKT pathway by directly inhibiting the transcription of Sirt1 and subsequent Rictor, thereby enhancing hepatic glucose production and causing hyperglycaemia as well as glucose metabolism dysfunction. These novel findings indicate that Sirt1 reduction in the liver may be responsible for the hepatic insulin resistance and impaired glucose metabolism in the 1,25(OH)2D3-deficient mice. Although our findings suggest that VDR regulates Sirt1 at the transcriptional level, we cannot exclude the possibility that there is posttranscriptional modification of Sirt1. Mutt et al.  reported that long-term VD deficiency caused hepatic insulin resistance through impairing the PI3K-AKT-FOXO1 pathway while VD ameliorated the above dysfunction via activating the AKT/GSK3β and AKT/FOXO1 signaling pathways, which was consistent with our findings. However, they did not further investigate the underlying mechanisms between VD deficiency and impaired activation of the AKT-FOXO1 pathway. In our study, we, for the first time, identified VDR-Sirt1 as the key genes mediating the pathology and the downstream critical canonical AKT/FOXO1 pathway.
As reviewed by Bouillon et al., there are several reports that examined the effects of vitamin D signaling on glucose metabolism . Some reports show positive findings, and others are negative. Our study revealed that the serum insulin level of mice with low calcium and low phosphorus caused by vitamin D deficiency did not decrease significantly compared with wild-type mice when fed with high calcium and phosphorus diet, which may be related to the removal of the low calcium due to lack of VD intake. In addition, VDR-null mice are often used for the establishment of VD deficiency models in previous studies. Here, we generated homozygous mice with targeted deletion of the 1α(OH)ase gene which still had VDR expression in cells in spite of decreased VDR level, which is in line with the real physiology of VD deficiency in humans. The main pathological manifestations of 1α(OH)ase-null mice were glucose overproduction and insulin resistance in the liver in the present study, although the serum insulin did not appear abnormal in the 1,25(OH)2D3-deficient mice.
In summary, our study shows that VDR and RXR form a protein complex that binds the VDRE on the Sirt1 promoter, positively regulating Sirt1 expression. 1α(OH)ase deletion decreases the expression of Sirt1 and Rictor, causing a reduction in the phosphorylation of AKT at S473. This event maintains the nuclear localization of FOXO1 and induces increases in the transcription and translation of G6pase and PCK1, two gluconeogenetic genes, giving rise to glucose overproduction in the liver and hyperglycaemia and uncovering a mechanism by which VD deficiency eventually leads to chronic hyperglycaemia and hepatic insulin resistance. By understanding how 1,25(OH)2D3 deletion stimulates G6PC and PCK1 transcription through suppression of the Sirt1-mTOR2/AKT/FOXO1 axis and determining the role of Sirt1 in VD deficiency-induced impairment of insulin sensitivity and glucose intolerance, we provide critical evidence about a significant metabolic pathway involved in the type 2 diabetes.
The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Qi Yuan and Ridong Zhang contributed equally to this manuscript.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81400789) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China (No. BK20140459).
Supplemental Table 1: qRT-PCR primers. Supplemental Table 2: primers used in Luciferase assay. Supplemental Table 3: ChIP-qPCR primers. (Supplementary Materials)
L. K. Billings and J. C. Florez, “The genetics of type 2 diabetes: what have we learned from GWAS?” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1212, no. 1, pp. 59–77, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. González-Molero, G. Rojo-Martínez, S. Morcillo et al., “Vitamin D and incidence of diabetes: a prospective cohort study,” Clinical Nutrition, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 571–573, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Pittas, J. Lau, F. B. Hu, and B. Dawson-Hughes, “The role of vitamin D and calcium in type 2 diabetes. A systematic review and meta-analysis,” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 2017–2029, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Pittas, J. Nelson, J. Mitri et al., “Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin D and progression to diabetes in patients at risk for diabetes: an ancillary analysis in the diabetes prevention program,” Diabetes Care, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 565–573, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. G. Pittas, B. Dawson-Hughes, P. Sheehan et al., “Vitamin D supplementation and prevention of type 2 diabetes,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 381, no. 6, pp. 520–530, 2019.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. F. Holick, “Vitamin D deficiency,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 357, no. 3, pp. 266–281, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Cheng and M. F. White, “Targeting Forkhead box O1 from the concept to metabolic diseases: lessons from mouse models,” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 649–661, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Crossland, D. Constantin-Teodosiu, S. M. Gardiner, D. Constantin, and P. L. Greenhaff, “A potential role for Akt/FOXO signalling in both protein loss and the impairment of muscle carbohydrate oxidation during sepsis in rodent skeletal muscle,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 586, no. 22, pp. 5589–5600, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Nakae, B. C. Park, and D. Accili, “Insulin stimulates phosphorylation of the forkhead transcription factor FKHR on serine 253 through a Wortmannin-sensitive pathway,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 23, pp. 15982–15985, 1999.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Chen, S. A. Villalta, and D. K. Agrawal, “FOXO1 mediates vitamin D deficiency-induced insulin resistance in skeletal muscle,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 585–595, 2016.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Motta, N. Divecha, M. Lemieux et al., “Mammalian SIRT1 represses forkhead transcription factors,” Cell, vol. 116, no. 4, pp. 551–563, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nemoto, M. M. Fergusson, and T. Finkel, “Nutrient availability regulates SIRT1 through a forkhead-dependent pathway,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5704, pp. 2105–2108, 2004.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Banks, N. Kon, C. Knight et al., “SirT1 gain of function increases energy efficiency and prevents diabetes in mice,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 333–341, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Wang, H. S. Kim, C. Xiao, X. Xu, O. Gavrilova, and C. X. Deng, “Hepatic Sirt1 deficiency in mice impairs mTorc2/Akt signaling and results in hyperglycemia, oxidative damage, and insulin resistance,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 121, no. 11, pp. 4477–4490, 2011.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. K. Panda, D. Miao, M. L. Tremblay et al., “Targeted ablation of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D 1alpha -hydroxylase enzyme: evidence for skeletal, reproductive, and immune dysfunction,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 98, no. 13, pp. 7498–7503, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. O'Brien and D. K. Granner, “Regulation of gene expression by insulin,” Physiological Reviews, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 1109–1161, 1996.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. O'Brien, R. S. Streeper, J. E. Ayala, B. T. Stadelmaier, and L. A. Hornbuckle, “Insulin-regulated gene expression,” Biochemical Society Transactions, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 552–558, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. M. Agati, D. Yeagley, and P. G. Quinn, “Assessment of the roles of mitogen-activated protein kinase, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, protein kinase B, and protein kinase C in insulin inhibition of cAMP-induced phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene transcription,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 30, pp. 18751–18759, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Schmoll, K. S. Walker, D. R. Alessi et al., “Regulation of glucose-6-phosphatase gene expression by protein kinase Bα and the forkhead transcription factor FKHR,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 275, no. 46, pp. 36324–36333, 2000.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sutherland, R. M. O'Brien, and D. K. Granner, “Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, but not p70/p85 ribosomal S6 protein kinase, is required for the regulation of phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase (PEPCK) gene expression by insulin,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 270, no. 26, pp. 15501–15506, 1995.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Foufelle and P. Ferré, “New perspectives in the regulation of hepatic glycolytic and lipogenic genes by insulin and glucose: a role for the transcription factor sterol regulatory element binding protein-1c,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 366, no. 2, pp. 377–391, 2002.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Huang and D. J. Tindall, “Dynamic FoxO transcription factors,” Journal of Cell Science, vol. 120, no. 15, pp. 2479–2487, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Barthel, D. Schmoll, K. D. Krüger et al., “Differential regulation of endogenous glucose-6-phosphatase and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase gene expression by the forkhead transcription factor FKHR in H4IIE-hepatoma cells,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 285, no. 4, pp. 897–902, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. T. Vander Kooi, H. Onuma, J. K. Oeser et al., “The glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit gene promoter contains both positive and negative glucocorticoid response elements,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 3001–3022, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. T. Cunningham, J. T. Rodgers, D. H. Arlow, F. Vazquez, V. K. Mootha, and P. Puigserver, “mTOR controls mitochondrial oxidative function through a YY1-PGC-1α transcriptional complex,” Nature, vol. 450, no. 7170, pp. 736–740, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. D. Sarbassov, D. A. Guertin, S. M. Ali, and D. M. Sabatini, “Phosphorylation and regulation of Akt/PKB by the Rictor-mTOR complex,” Science, vol. 307, no. 5712, pp. 1098–1101, 2005.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. M. Evans, “The steroid and thyroid hormone receptor superfamily,” Science, vol. 240, no. 4854, pp. 889–895, 1988.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Gagnon, Z. X. Lu, D. J. Magliano et al., “Low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is associated with increased risk of the development of the metabolic syndrome at five years: results from a national, population-based prospective study (the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study: AusDiab),” The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1953–1961, 2012.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Capeau, “Insulinoresistance et steatose hepatique chez l'homme,” Diabetes & Metabolism, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 649–657, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. N. Gross, A. P. van den Heuvel, and M. J. Birnbaum, “The role of FoxO in the regulation of metabolism,” Oncogene, vol. 27, no. 16, pp. 2320–2336, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Jacinto, V. Facchinetti, D. Liu et al., “SIN1/MIP1 maintains Rictor-mTOR complex integrity and regulates Akt phosphorylation and substrate specificity,” Cell, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 125–137, 2006.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Haussler, G. K. Whitfield, C. A. Haussler et al., “The nuclear vitamin D receptor: biological and molecular regulatory properties revealed,” Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 325–349, 1998.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Brownlee, “Biochemistry and molecular cell biology of diabetic complications,” Nature, vol. 414, no. 6865, pp. 813–820, 2001.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Kim, Y. Wei, and J. R. Sowers, “Role of mitochondrial dysfunction in insulin resistance,” Circulation Research, vol. 102, no. 4, pp. 401–414, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Y. Lee, C. S. Choi, A. L. Birkenfeld et al., “Targeted expression of catalase to mitochondria prevents age-associated reductions in mitochondrial function and insulin resistance,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 668–674, 2010.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Newsholme, E. P. Haber, S. M. Hirabara et al., “Diabetes associated cell stress and dysfunction: role of mitochondrial and non-mitochondrial ROS production and activity,” The Journal of Physiology, vol. 583, no. 1, pp. 9–24, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. A. Veal, A. M. Day, and B. A. Morgan, “Hydrogen peroxide sensing and signaling,” Molecular Cell, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2007.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Mutt, G. S. Raza, M. J. Mäkinen, S. Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi, M. R. Järvelin, and K. H. Herzig, “Vitamin D deficiency induces insulin resistance and re-supplementation attenuates hepatic glucose output via the PI3K-AKT-FOXO1 mediated pathway,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, vol. 64, no. 1, article e1900728, 2020.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Bouillon, G. Carmeliet, L. Verlinden et al., “Vitamin D and human health: lessons from vitamin D receptor null mice,” Endocrine Reviews, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 726–776, 2008.View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar