Research Article
Comparison of Risk Assessment Strategies for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Stable Chest Pain: A Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Study
Table 5
Reclassification table comparing the RF-CL model, NICE strategy, and ESC strategy in patients with ESC-PTP below 5% and above 15%.
| | Low | High | Total | Reclassification | NRI† | | Up | Down | | |
| | Risk groups by ESC strategy | | | | | | Risk groups by NICE strategy | | | | | | | | Negative patients | | | | 2.28% | 9.59% | 19.88% | <0.0001 | Low | 125 | 5 | 130 | | | | | High | 21 | 68 | 89 | | | | | Total | 146 | 73 | 219 | | | | | Positive patients | | | | 13.14% | 0.57% | | | Low | 3 | 23 | 26 | | | | | High | 1 | 148 | 149 | | | | | Total | 4 | 171 | 175 | | | | | | Risk groups by RF-CL model | | | | | | Risk groups by NICE strategy | | | | | | | | Negative patients | | | | 2.28% | 14.61% | 24.33% | <0.0001 | Low | 125 | 5 | 130 | | | | | High | 32 | 57 | 89 | | | | | Total | 157 | 62 | 219 | | | | | Positive patients | | | | 12.57% | 0.57% | | | Low | 4 | 22 | 26 | | | | | High | 1 | 148 | 149 | | | | | Total | 5 | 170 | 175 | | | | | | Risk groups by ESC strategy | | | | | | Risk groups by RF-CL model | | | | | | | | Negative patients | | | | 6.85% | 1.83% | -4.45% | 0.0598 | Low | 142 | 15 | 157 | | | | | High | 4 | 58 | 62 | | | | | Total | 146 | 73 | 219 | | | | | Positive patients | | | | 1.71% | 1.14% | | | Low | 2 | 3 | 5 | | | | | High | 2 | 168 | 170 | | | | | Total | 4 | 171 | 175 | | | | |
|
|
Abbreviations as in Table 3. |