Research Article  Open Access
Svetlana N. Khonina, Andrei V. Ustinov, "Sharper Focal Spot for a Radially Polarized Beam Using Ring Aperture with Phase Jump", Journal of Engineering, vol. 2013, Article ID 512971, 8 pages, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/512971
Sharper Focal Spot for a Radially Polarized Beam Using Ring Aperture with Phase Jump
Abstract
We study analytically and numerically in which way the width of ring aperture containing a phase jump affects the size and intensity of the focal spot generated with a radially polarized beam. It is shown that by means of destructive interference of beams coming from the differentphase rings it becomes possible to overcome the scalar diffraction limit corresponding to the first zero of the zeroorder Bessel function. The minimal focal spot size (FWHM ) is found to be attained when the annular aperture width amounts to 20% of the fullaperture radius. In this case, the sidelobe intensity is not larger than 30% of the central peak. A wider annular aperture with the phase jump introduced is also shown to form a focal spot not exceeding the diffraction limit for a narrow annular aperture, simultaneously providing a nearly six times higher intensity. In this case, the side lobes amount to 35% of the central peak.
1. Introduction
A narrow annular pupil that blocks the light from propagating practically through the entire central part of the lens [1–3] is a simple, albeit lowefficiency technique to generate narrowextended beams in the focal plane.
More complicated techniques for the fullaperture apodization of the pupil’s function that employ both purely phase and amplitudephase distributions have also been reported [4–9]. In this case, a tighter focal spot is normally obtained at a sacrifice of the energy redistribution from the central peak to the side lobes. This situation is in full compliance with the Toraldo di Francia theory [10], which states that the central focal spot can be made as small as one likes but at a sacrifice of increasing side lobes, which sometimes become several times [11], or even orders [8, 9], larger than the central peak.
The presence of the substantial side lobes limits the use of “superresolution” elements in the imaging and optical data recording systems, in which the acceptable sidelobe level is 30% of the central peak [12].
The optimization procedures aimed at controlling the growth of the side lobes inevitably lead to a widened central spot [12, 13]. With the side lobes’ intensity being less than 30% of the central peak intensity, they can be filtered out [14] or leveled as a result of nonlinear light interaction with the recording medium [15].
The focal spot can be made tighter without an essential increase in the side lobes by introducing a radial phase jump which leads to the destructive interference between two light beams generated by each of the pupil’s rings [15, 16]. The destructive action of the πphase jump is well known in the coding methods also [17, 18].
Note that although the fullaperture apodization of the lens pupil with binary radial elements is usually considered [4, 6–8, 16, 19–21], it has been numerically demonstrated [22] that by diaphragming the lens central part (~75% in terms of radius) the focus can be made considerably tighter.
In this paper, we study analytically and numerically in which way the size of an annular pupil with a radial phase jump affects the focal spot size generated by a radially polarized beam. It has been shown that the destructive interference between the beams passing differentphase rings enables going beyond a scalar limit corresponding to the zeroorder Bessel function . A tighter focal spot is attained at a sacrifice of a lower focal intensity and higher side lobes that corresponds to the Toraldo di Francia theory. However, due to increase of width of the ring aperture, we can increase energy in the central spot and keep a level of side lobes below 30% of the central peak.
The analysis of the sharp focusing based on the RichardsWolf integrals [23] has shown that the dependence of the focal spot size on the width of the narrow annular pupil is different for the scalar and vector models. In the former case, the diffractionlimited focal spot size is attained when the width of the ring that transmits the peripheral rays tends to zero, while the focal intensity drops quadratically with decreasing width. In the latter case, the minimal focal spot size is attained at a fixed annular pupil width, with the focal intensity being proportional to the ring width to the ()th power.
The numerical simulation has shown that notwithstanding the destructive interference, by choosing a fairly wide annular pupil, the focal point intensity can be essentially increased without exceeding the limit corresponding to the narrow annular pupil.
2. Analysis of Generating a Sharper Focal Spot: Scalar Model
The focusing of a bounded plane wave with a lens of radius and focal length is described by a FourierBessel transform, with the intensity in the focal plane given by which describes an Airy pattern generated in the lens focal plane.
Formally, obtaining a Bessel beam in the focal plane requires taking a FourierBessel transform of an infinitely narrow annular pupil:
The numerical aperture (NA) of the lens of radius and focal length is defined by the following relationship: or, in the paraxial case, where is refractive index of media.
The resulting focal spot size in the cases under study is characterized by the following parameters.
When focusing on the full aperture of (1), the central focal spot radius is determined by the first zero of the firstorder Bessel function ():
In the paraxial case,
The estimate for the focal spot size at half level of maximum intensity is and for the spot area is
When focusing on the narrow annular diaphragm of (2), the focal spot radius is determined by the first zero of the zeroorder Bessel function ():
In the paraxial case,
The comparison of (5) and (9) suggests that introducing the narrow ring enables generating a 1.6 times smaller focal spot even at high NA (Figure 1).
The estimate for the focal spot size at half level of maximum intensity is which is 1.44 times lower than for the fullaperture illumination, whereas the spot area at halfmaximum intensity is defined as which, accordingly, is 2.1 times smaller.
Note, however, that (2) disregards the amplitude decrease associated with increasing illuminated area, as the value of the δfunction is assumed to be equal to infinity.
Assume that the ring is not infinitely narrow, as is the case in (2), but of a finite width that comprises a small fraction Δ of the lens radius. In this case, the complex amplitude is given by
In view of the small Δ, the integral (13) can be approximately calculated by multiplying the integrand value at the middle point: by the line length
We can see that although this approximation gives the same focal spot size as that for the infinitely narrow ring (2), this relation also takes into account that the amplitude decreases at the center proportionally to the decreasing annular aperture width Δ. If is not replaced with in the Bessel function argument, the spot radius estimate becomes a bit larger.
Below, we discuss in which way the focal spot size can be made smaller by introducing a phase jump of πradian along the central radius of the narrow annular aperture:
A radial phase jump which leads to the destructive interference between two light beams generated by each of the pupil’s rings was used for sharp focusing [15, 16]. The destructive action of the πphase jump is well known in the coding methods also [17, 18].
The resulting distribution in the focal spot will correspond to the destructive interference of beams generated by the individual rings:
In view of (15), we obtain
From (18) it is clear that in spite of destructive interference there is any nonzero intensity at the focal point because the inner and outer areas of the annular aperture are not equal.
To estimate the resulting equation (18) for small , let us recall that the Bessel function can be approximately expressed through a Taylor series [24]:
Then, (18) is approximately reduced to
The first coefficient in the righthand side of (20) shows that the central spot amplitude falls proportionally to the annular aperture width squared. This effect is due to the fact that the radius of πphase jump is the middle of the ring. The negative value at the zero point means that there is a phase shift by π with respect to the incident beam.
The focal spot radius is derived by setting the expression in the square brackets equal to zero, so that
Because , the smallest radius in (21) is attained at , being equal to
Note that the estimate in (22) is understated since with the quadratic approximation of the Bessel function in (19), the resulting value appears to be 20% lower than the true value. Therefore, we will consider the following value as more accurate:
This estimate predicts that the radius should be 2.8 times smaller than for the fullaperture lens and 1.7 times smaller than for the narrow annular aperture.
The estimates for the focal spot diameter and area at halfmaximum intensity are as follows:
Note that, in this case, the focal spot diameter FWHM in (24) appears to be larger than the radius measured as far as the zerointensity point (23). This situation differs from the one occurred for the first and zeroorder Bessel functions, for which the spot size FWHM was smaller than the zerointensity radius, showing that the central peak walls are steeper.
3. Analysis of the Focal Spot Size Decrease When a Radially Polarized Beam Is Tightly Focused
When doing the tight focusing of a radially polarized beam with the use of a narrow annular pupil, the major contribution to the focal plane has been known to be from the longitudinal field component [1–3]. The significant predominance of one component over the other vector field components creates a situation similar to the scalar regime. Thus, scalar theory instruments can be successfully utilized, producing fairly accurate results. The tightly focused focal spot usually appears to be larger in size than the scalar estimate as different components really contribute to the focal spot.
Regarding the above considerations, only the longitudinal component will be taken into account when analyzing the tight focusing of radially polarized light.
For a narrow annular pupil, we obtain [9]
Thus, similar to the scalar case (see (15)), the focal spot size is determined by the first zero of the zeroorder Bessel function. Hence, with decreasing annular pupil’s width , we obtain in the limit
The focal spot size can be further decreased without an essential sidelobe increase based on the destructive interference if a πradian phase jump is introduced along the central radius of the narrow annular aperture (16). Then, the field distribution in the focal plane is given by
To calculate the integrals in (28), we write down
Then, retaining the Δ terms up to the second order, we obtain
From (30) an estimate for the focal spot radius then takes the form with the minimum attained at .
Thus, the minimal estimate of the central spot radius is given by
4. Numerical Results
Although the estimates discussed in Section 3 are approximate, they enable us to analyze in which way the focal spot size and intensity depend on the annular aperture’s width. For analytical calculations, it was convenient to use the middle radius of the ring. We understand that the radius of phase jump is additional parameter for optimization of the focal distribution; however, experience of other researchers [4, 6–8, 19–21] shows that even a plenty of free parameters does not allow to reduce the focal spot simultaneously keeping energy. Therefore, we have decided to vary only the width of the ring with the middle πphase jump. This limitation may be convenient for the experimental realization.
In this section, the sharp focusing of a radially polarized beam is numerically simulated using the RichardsWolf integral relations [23] for an aplanatic focusing system.
Figure 2 shows the focal spot size (FWHM) as a function of the annular aperture width (Δ) for an element without and with the radial phase jump of (16). The dotted horizontal line denotes the scalar limit for the lens , whereas the solid line denotes the scalar limit for the infinitely narrow ring .
Figure 2 suggests that with a simple annular aperture, to go beyond the lens scalar limit, it is necessary to block a lens central portion of radius (), which amounts to ~20% of the lens area. Note that all field components are accounted for in the total intensity. Meanwhile, the results corresponding to the infinitely narrow aperture remain unattained even at a very small width (at , ).
If there is a radial phase jump (16), there is no need to block any part of the lens to go beyond the scalar limit. At the same time, blocking the central rays on the radius (, with ~20% of the area got covered) enables obtaining a focal spot smaller than the scalar limit for the infinitely narrow ring.
Note that the minimal size of is attained when the annular aperture’s width is (Figure 2). This value is approximately 1.2 times larger than the spot size derived in the previous section and employed in the estimate of (32).
Figure 3 shows the plot of the normalized focal point intensity against the annular aperture’s width (Δ) without and with a radial phase jump. The vertical dotted lines mark the annular aperture’s width at which the focal spot of size is formed: for a conventional annular aperture the width is , and for aperture with the introduced phase jump the width is . Ring size of is rather narrow. Thus, for practical reasons, we decided to start from this value rather than the limit of . It is seen that when the phase jump was introduced, the focal point intensity generated with the wider annular aperture is several times larger than that generated with the conventional narrow ring.
Table 1 gives the numerical simulation results when a radially polarized beam is tightly focusing (, ) and a narrow annular aperture with the phase jump of (16) is used: Δ is the annular slit width, is the total intensity in the focus, is the ratio of the total intensity of the first side lobe to that of the central focal spot, FWHM is the central focal spot diameter in terms of fullwidth halfmaximum intensity, and is the central spot diameter at halfmaximum intensity of the longitudinal component.

Table 1 suggests that the smallest central focal spot (, see 2nd row of Table 1) has been attained without an unacceptable increase in the side lobes . However, there is an essential loss of the central spot energy, with the intensity being half of that provided by the narrow annular aperture (1st row of Table 1). The longitudinal distribution suggests that the focal spot becomes tighter due to the destructive interference of the beams transmitted by different aperture’s rings.
However, by increasing the pupil’s width, the central spot energy can be significantly increased with spot size smaller than that generated with the narrow ring. In particular, at (3rd row of Table 1), the focal spot is slightly smaller , whereas the intensity is ~6 times larger when compared with that generated by the narrow annular aperture. A disadvantage consists in somewhat higher side lobes .
For the fullaperture case with πphase jump (, 4th row of Table 1), what we observe is not only a larger focal intensity but also lower side lobes. In this case, the focal spot size does not exceed the Airy pattern’s scalar limit.
Results for the case of fullaperture illumination without any apodization are shown (5th row of Table 1) for comparison: it is possible to see that the focal spot size exceeds the Airy pattern’s scalar limit.
5. Conclusions
The analysis of the sharp focusing has shown that the dependence of the focal spot size on the narrow annular pupil’s width is different for the scalar and vector models.
In the scalar model, when describing the focusing based on the Fourier transform, the smallest focal spot is attained when the peripheral ring width tends to zero, while the focus intensity drops quadratically with decreasing ring width.
In the vector model of the sharp focusing of the radially polarized beam (Debye’s approximation), the smallest focal spot is obtained at a fixed annular aperture’s width equal to 20% of the fullaperture radius. The amplitude at the focus is proportional to the ring width to the power . It is one of the most important analytical results which allows us to estimate the energy that is stored in a central spot.
It has been analytically and numerically shown that the destructive interference between the beams passing differentphase rings enables going beyond a scalar limit corresponding to the zeroorder Bessel function . A tighter focal spot is attained at a sacrifice of a lower focal intensity and higher side lobes, with the latter not becoming larger than 30% of the central peak.
We have numerically shown that by introducing a radial πphase jump along the aperture’s middle radius the scalar limit can be broken: we have got (for the Airy pattern ). In the meantime, blocking out the central rings with a stop (covering ~20% of the area) enables obtaining a smaller focal spot with intensity nearly 6 times higher than for simple narrow ring. The lack is higher sidelobes reaching up to 35% of the central peak intensity.
Certainly, reduction of the focal spot size just by factor 1.65 (from for open aperture to for ring with jump) is accompanied with huge losses of energy in this spot (by factor 50). It is a significant disadvantage for the applications based on high energy such as a nonlinear scanning microscopy. Nevertheless, optical microscopy applications can tolerate very high losses: scanning microscopes can work with only a few photons per second providing sensitivity to tens orders below of laser power [11].
Acknowledgments
The work was financially supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (Project 8231) and by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grants 130700266 and 130797004r_povolzhe_a).
References
 S. Quabis, R. Dorn, M. Eberler, O. Glöckl, and G. Leuchs, “Focusing light to a tighter spot,” Optics Communications, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2000. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 R. Dorn, S. Quabis, and G. Leuchs, “Sharper focus for a radially polarized light beam,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 91, no. 23, pp. 2339011–2339014, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 C. J. R. Sheppard and A. Choudhury, “Annular pupils, radial polarization, and superresolution,” Applied Optics, vol. 43, no. 22, pp. 4322–4327, 2004. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 L. E. Helseth, “Mesoscopic orbitals in strongly focused light,” Optics Communications, vol. 224, no. 4–6, pp. 255–261, 2003. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. Kozawa and S. Sato, “Sharper focal spot formed by higherorder radially polarized laser beams,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1793–1798, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 C.C. Sun and C.K. Liu, “Ultrasmall focusing spot with a long depth of focus based on polarization and phase modulation,” Optics Letters, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 99–101, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 H. Wang, L. Shi, B. Lukyanchuk, C. Sheppard, and C. T. Chong, “Creation of a needle of longitudinally polarized light in vacuum using binary optics,” Nature Photonics, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 501–505, 2008. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. N. Khonina and S. G. Volotovsky, “Controlling the contribution of the electric field components to the focus of a highaperture lens using binary phase structures,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2188–2197, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 S. N. Khonina, A. V. Ustinov, and E. A. Pelevina, “Analysis of wave aberration influence on reducing focal spot size in a highaperture focusing system,” Journal of Optics, vol. 13, no. 9, Article ID 095702, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 G. Toraldo di Francia, “Degrees of freedom of an image,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 799–804, 1969. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 F. M. Huang and N. I. Zheludev, “Superresolution without evanescent waves,” Nano Letters, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 1249–1254, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 T. R. M. Sales and G. M. Morris, “Diffractive superresolution elements,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1637–1646, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 S. N. Khonina and I. Golub, “Enlightening darkness to dif fraction limit and beyond: comparison and optimization of different polarizations for dark spot generation,” Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1470–1474, 2012. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 J. Bewersdorf, A. Egner, and S. W. Hell, “4piconfocal microscopy is coming of age,” Imaging & Microscopy, vol. 4, pp. 24–25, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
 L. E. Helseth, “Breaking the diffraction limit in nonlinear materials,” Optics Communications, vol. 256, no. 4–6, pp. 435–438, 2005. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 N. Bokor and N. Davidson, “Tight parabolic dark spot with high numerical aperture focusing with a circular π phase plate,” Optics Communications, vol. 270, no. 2, pp. 145–150, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 V. V. Kotlyar, S. N. Khonina, A. S. Melekhin, and V. A. Soifer, “Fractional encoding method for spatial filters computation,” Asian Journal of Physics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 273–286, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 S. N. Khonina, S. A. Balalayev, R. V. Skidanov, V. V. Kotlyar, B. Päivänranta, and J. Turunen, “Encoded binary diffractive element to form hypergeometric laser beams,” Journal of Optics A, vol. 11, no. 6, Article ID 065702, 7 pages, 2009. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 W. Chen and Q. Zhan, “Threedimensional focus shaping with cylindrical vector beams,” Optics Communications, vol. 265, no. 2, pp. 411–417, 2006. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 X. Gao, J. Wang, H. Gu, and W. Xu, “Focusing properties of concentric piecewise cylindrical vector beam,” Optik, vol. 118, no. 6, pp. 257–265, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 K. Huang, P. Shi, X.L. Kang, X. Zhang, and Y. P. Li, “Design of DOE for generating a needle of a strong longitudinally polarized field,” Optics Letters, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 965–967, 2010. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Tian and J. Pu, “Tight focusing of a doubleringshaped, azimuthally polarized beam,” Optics Letters, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 2014–2016, 2011. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 B. Richards and E. Wolf, “Electromagnetic diffraction in optical systems. II. Structure of the image field in an aplanatic system,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, vol. 253, no. 1274, pp. 358–379, 1959. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Courier Dover Publications, North Chelmsford, Mass, USA, 1972.
Copyright
Copyright © 2013 Svetlana N. Khonina and Andrei V. Ustinov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.