The Importance of the Model Choice for Experimental Semivariogram Modeling and Its Consequence in Evaluation Process

Table 2

Comparison between kriging results and true values.

Point_id	point_z	Surfer interpolation			Geostatistical analyst interpolation			KA interpolaton
		Point_z	Delta	Delta^∧2	Point_z	Delta	Delta^∧2	Point_z	Delta	Delta^∧2
162	271.43	271.82	0.39	0.15	271.36	−0.07	0.01	271.58	0.15	0.02
193	146.55	147.29	0.74	0.54	147.32	0.77	0.59	147.29	0.74	0.55
329	214.69	214.77	0.08	0.01	214.80	0.11	0.01	214.75	0.06	0.00
411	188.64	188.24	−0.40	0.16	188.36	−0.29	0.08	188.32	−0.32	0.10
616	181.56	181.63	0.07	0.00	181.48	−0.08	0.01	181.55	−0.01	0.00
645	207.62	207.59	−0.03	0.00	207.61	−0.01	0.00	207.62	0.00	0.00
679	287.69	287.84	0.14	0.02	287.34	−0.35	0.12	287.68	−0.01	0.00
877	184.05	183.76	−0.28	0.08	183.83	−0.22	0.05	183.80	−0.25	0.06
917	155.31	155.06	−0.25	0.06	155.27	−0.04	0.00	155.17	−0.15	0.02
1272	183.97	183.43	−0.54	0.29	183.84	−0.13	0.02	183.64	−0.33	0.11
1309	243.56	243.39	−0.17	0.03	243.70	0.14	0.02	243.54	−0.02	0.00
1398	172.85	172.56	−0.29	0.09	172.87	0.02	0.00	172.72	−0.14	0.02
1422	210.67	211.08	0.41	0.16	211.19	0.52	0.27	211.14	0.46	0.21
1722	278.81	278.57	−0.24	0.06	278.61	−0.20	0.04	278.59	−0.22	0.05
1733	236.76	236.81	0.05	0.00	236.66	−0.10	0.01	236.73	−0.02	0.00
1844	206.62	206.43	−0.18	0.03	206.59	−0.03	0.00	206.51	−0.11	0.01
1935	274.15	273.53	−0.62	0.39	273.87	−0.28	0.08	274.12	−0.03	0.00
1960	201.38	201.10	−0.28	0.08	201.22	−0.16	0.02	201.16	−0.22	0.05
2075	177.02	176.67	−0.35	0.12	177.12	0.10	0.01	176.89	−0.13	0.02
2169	211.48	210.92	−0.56	0.31	211.27	−0.21	0.04	211.45	−0.03	0.00
2261	223.21	223.28	0.07	0.00	223.42	0.20	0.04	223.35	0.14	0.02
2428	204.57	205.09	0.52	0.27	204.65	0.08	0.01	204.87	0.30	0.09
2499	236.47	235.82	−0.65	0.43	236.14	−0.33	0.11	236.45	−0.02	0.00
2508	258.17	257.89	−0.28	0.08	257.94	−0.23	0.05	257.92	−0.25	0.06
2598	183.74	183.26	−0.48	0.23	183.80	0.06	0.00	183.53	−0.21	0.05
		SUM	−3.15	3.60	SUM	−0.71	1.59	SUM	−0.62	1.45