Research Article
Comparative Evaluation of Single-Channel MMSE-Based Noise Reduction Schemes for Speech Recognition
Table 2
Results of frequency-domain algorithms on AURORA2.
| | Test A | Test B | Test C | A-B-C AVG |
| | C | M | C | M | C | M | C | M |
| LSA | 76.83 | 87.02 | 77.06 | 85.24 | 78.97 | 88.48 | 77.62 | 86.91 | | 78.69 | 89.45 | 79.95 | 88.33 | 79.80 | 89.95 | 79.48 | 89.24 | | 76.44 | 87.12 | 77.34 | 85.97 | 77.61 | 87.66 | 77.13 | 86.92 | OMLSA | 76.81 | 89.13 | 78.15 | 88.22 | 78.34 | 90.20 | 77.77 | 89.18 | | 77.28 | 89.88 | 79.00 | 89.13 | 78.10 | 90.23 | 78.13 | 89.75 | | 75.49 | 88.88 | 77.77 | 88.59 | 76.49 | 89.56 | 76.58 | 89.01 |
| baseline | 65.00 | 88.11 | 69.89 | 89.09 | 65.87 | 89.18 | 66.92 | 88.79 |
|
|