Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Volume 2016, Article ID 4789803, 20 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/4789803
Research Article

User Adaptive and Context-Aware Smart Home Using Pervasive and Semantic Technologies

1Intelligent Systems Content and Interaction Laboratory, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytexneiou 9, 15780 Zografou, Greece
2Department of Cultural Technology and Communication, University of the Aegean, Mytilene, Lesvos, Greece
3Department of Informatics, Ionian University, Corfu, Greece

Received 17 January 2016; Revised 6 July 2016; Accepted 17 July 2016

Academic Editor: John N. Sahalos

Copyright © 2016 Aggeliki Vlachostergiou et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. Shneiderman, Universal Usability: Pushing Human-Computer Interaction Research to Empower Every Citizen, 1999.
  2. B. Kules, “User modeling for adaptive and adaptable software systems,” in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability (CUU '00), pp. 16–17, November 2000.
  3. A. Kobsa, “Generic user modeling systems,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 49–63, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  4. L. Nielsen, Personas. The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, The Interaction Design Foundation, Aarhus, Denmark, 2nd edition, 2013.
  5. A. Cooper, The Inmates Are Running the Asylum: Why High Tech Products Drive Us Crazy and How to Restore the Sanity, 2004.
  6. D. Saffer, Designing for Interaction: Creating Smart Applications and Clever Devices, New Riders Press, 2007, http://www.designingforinteraction.com.
  7. J. Pruitt and T. Adlin, The Persona Lifecycle: Keeping People in Mind Throughout the Design Process, 2006.
  8. D. Norman, “Ad-hoc personas empathetic focus,” 2004, http://jnd.org/.
  9. A. Zimmermann, A. Lorenz, and R. Oppermann, “An operational definition of context,” in Modeling and Using Context, B. Kokinov, D. C. Richardson, T. R. Roth-Berghofer, and L. Vieu, Eds., vol. 4635 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 558–571, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. M. Baldauf, S. Dustdar, and F. Rosenberg, “A survey on context-aware systems,” International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 263–277, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Bettini, O. Brdiczka, K. Henricksen et al., “A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques,” Pervasive and Mobile Computing, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 161–180, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Eisenhauer, P. Rosengren, and P. Antolin, “A development platform for integrating wireless devices and sensors into ambient intelligence systems,” in Proceedings of the 6th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks Workshops, pp. 1–3, IEEE, Rome, Italy, June 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. SandS, “Sands-project,” 2015, http://www.sands-project.eu/.
  14. SmartSantander, 2015, https://www.fi-xifi.eu/fiware-ops/service-offer-management.html.
  15. G. Fischer, “User modeling in human-computer interaction,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 11, no. 1-2, pp. 65–86, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. P. Gregor, A. F. Newell, and M. Zajicek, “Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people,” in Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS '02), pp. 151–156, ACM, Edinburgh, UK, July 2002.
  17. M. Hatala and R. Wakkary, “Ontology-based user modeling in an augmented audio reality system for museums,” User Modelling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 15, no. 3-4, pp. 339–380, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. F. Pereira, “A triple user characterization model for video adaptation and quality of experience evaluation,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 7th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP '05), pp. 1–4, IEEE, Shanghai, China, November 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. U. Persad, P. Langdon, and J. Clarkson, “Characterising user capabilities to support inclusive design evaluation,” Universal Access in the Information Society, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 119–135, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Heckmann, E. Schwarzkopf, J. Mori, D. Dengler, and A. Kroner, “The user model and context ontology GUMO revisited for future web 2.0 extensions,” in Contexts and Ontologies Representation and Reasoning, p. 42, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  21. C. Evers, R. Kniewel, K. Geihs, and L. Schmidt, “Achieving user participation for adaptive applications,” in Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, pp. 200–207, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. Casas, R. Blasco Marín, A. Robinet et al., “User modelling in ambient intelligence for elderly and disabled people,” in Computers Helping People with Special Needs: 11th International Conference, ICCHP 2008, Linz, Austria, July 9–11, 2008. Proceedings, vol. 5105 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 114–122, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Castillejo, A. Almeida, D. López-De-Ipiña, and L. Chen, “Modeling users, context and devices for ambient assisted living environments,” Sensors, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 5354–5391, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. A. Johnson and N. Taatgen, User Modeling, Handbook of Human Factors in Web Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2005.
  25. P. T. Aquino Jr. and L. V. L. Filgueiras, “User modeling with personas,” in Proceedings of the Latin American Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (CLIHC '05), pp. 277–282, October 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. P. Castells, M. Fernández, D. Vallet, P. Mylonas, and Y. Avrithis, “Self-tuning personalized information retrieval in an ontology-based framework,” in On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: OTM 2005 Workshops, pp. 977–986, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  27. D. L. McGuinness and F. Van Harmelen, “Owl web ontology language overview,” W3C Recommendation, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  28. M. Hepp, “Possible ontologies: how reality constrains the development of relevant ontologies,” IEEE Internet Computing, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 90–96, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. F. Baader, The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2003. View at MathSciNet
  30. T. R. Gruber, “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 199–220, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. S. Miyamoto, Fuzzy Sets in Information Retrieval and Cluster Analysis, vol. 4 of Theory and Decision Library, Series D: System Theory, Knowledge Engineering and Problem Solving, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  32. G. J. Klir and B. Yuan, Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 1995. View at MathSciNet
  33. S. Calegari and D. Ciucci, “Fuzzy ontology, fuzzy description logics and fuzzy-owl,” in Applications of Fuzzy Sets Theory, pp. 118–126, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  34. E. Y. Song and K. B. Lee, “Service-oriented sensor data interoperability for IEEE 1451 smart transducers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Intrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC '09), pp. 1043–1048, IEEE, Singapore, May 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. F. Bonin, R. Bock, and N. Campbell, “How do we react to context? Annotation of individual and group engagement in a video corpus,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust (PASSAT '12) and International Confernece on Social Computing (SocialCom '12), pp. 899–903, IEEE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. P. J. Brown, J. D. Bovey, and X. Chen, “Context-aware applications: from the laboratory to the marketplace,” IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 58–64, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. Z. Zeng, M. Pantic, G. I. Roisman, and T. S. Huang, “A survey of affect recognition methods: audio, visual, and spontaneous expressions,” IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 39–58, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. R. Böck, S. Glüge, A. Wendemuth et al., “Intraindividual and interindividual multimodal emotion analyses in human-machine-interaction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA '12), pp. 59–64, IEEE, New Orleans, La, USA, March 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. Z. Hammal and J. F. Cohn, “Intra-and interpersonal functions of head motion in emotion communication,” in Proceedings of the 2014 Workshop on Roadmapping the Future of Multimodal Interaction Research including Business Opportunities and Challenges (RFMIR '14), pp. 19–22, ACM, Istanbul, Turkey, 2014.
  40. R. El Kaliouby, P. Robinson, and S. Keates, “Temporal context and the recognition of emotion from facial expression,” in Proceedings of the HCI International Conference, pp. 631–635, American Psychological Association, 2003.
  41. H. R. Knudsen and L. H. Muzekari, “The effects of verbal statements of context on facial expressions of emotion,” Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 202–212, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. T. Masuda, P. C. Ellsworth, B. Mesquita, J. Leu, S. Tanida, and E. Van de Veerdonk, “Placing the face in context: cultural differences in the perception of facial emotion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 365–381, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. R. Böck, S. Glüge, I. Siegert, A. Wendemuth, and S. Glüge, “Annotation and classification of changes of involvement in group conversation,” in Proceedings of the Humaine Association Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction (ACII '13), pp. 803–808, Geneva, Switzerland, September 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. J. Joshi, H. Gunes, and R. Goecke, “Automatic prediction of perceived traits using visual cues under varied situational context,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR '14), pp. 2855–2860, IEEE, Stockholm, Sweden, August 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. B. Schilit, N. Adams, and R. Want, “Context-aware computing applications,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, pp. 85–90, December 1994. View at Scopus
  46. N. S. Ryan, J. Pascoe, and D. R. Morse, “Enhanced reality fieldwork: the context-aware archaeological assistant,” in Computer Applications in Archaeology, British Archaeological Reports, V. Gaffney, M. van Leusen, and S. Exxon, Eds., pp. 182–196, Tempus Reparatum, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  47. P. J. Brown, “The stick-e document: a framework for creating context-aware applications,” j-EPODD, vol. 8, no. 2-3, pp. 259–272, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  48. D. Franklin and J. Flaschbart, “All gadget and no representation makes jack a dull environment,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Intelligent Environments, pp. 155–160, Menlo Park, Calif, USA, 1998.
  49. A. Ward, A. Jones, and A. Hopper, “A new location technique for the active office,” IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 42–47, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. T. Rodden, K. Cheverst, K. Davies, and A. Dix, “Exploiting context in HCI design for mobile systems,” in Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices, pp. 21–22, Citeseer, Glasgow, UK, May 1998.
  51. R. Hull, P. Neaves, and J. Bedford-Roberts, “Towards situated computing,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 146–153, October 1997. View at Scopus
  52. G. D. Abowd, A. K. Dey, P. J. Brown, N. Davies, M. Smith, and P. Steggles, “Towards a better understanding of context and context-awareness,” in Handheld and Ubiquitous Computing, H.-W. Gellersen, Ed., vol. 1707 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 304–307, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  53. Z. Duric, W. D. Gray, R. Heishman et al., “Integrating perceptual and cognitive modeling for adaptive and intelligent human-computer interaction,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 90, no. 7, pp. 1272–1289, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. K. Henricksen, J. Indulska, and A. Rakotonirainy, “Modeling context information in pervasive computing systems,” in Pervasive Computing, pp. 167–180, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  55. T. Gu, X. H. Wang, H. K. Pung, and D. Q. Zhang, “An ontology-based context model in intelligent environments,” in Proceedings of the Communication Networks and Distributed Systems Modeling and Simulation Conference, pp. 270–275, 2004.
  56. A. Schmidt, M. Beigl, and H.-W. Gellersen, “There is more to context than location,” Computers & Graphics, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 893–901, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. T. Gu, H. K. Pung, and D. Q. Zhang, “Toward an OSGi-based infrastructure for context-aware applications,” IEEE Pervasive Computing, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 66–74, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Almeida and D. López-de-Ipiña, “Assessing ambiguity of context data in intelligent environments: towards a more reliable context managing system,” Sensors, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 4934–4951, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. G. Stoilos, G. Stamou, V. Tzouvaras, J. Pan, and I. Horrocks, “Fuzzy owl: uncertainty and the semantic web,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop of OWL: Experiences and Directions, Galway, Ireland, November 2005.
  60. T. Lukasiewicz and U. Straccia, “Managing uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the semantic web,” Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 291–308, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. A. Dhall, R. Goecke, S. Lucey, and T. Gedeon, “Collecting large, richly annotated facial-expression databases from movies,” IEEE MultiMedia, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 34–41, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. J. R. Curhan and A. Pentland, “Thin slices of negotiation: predicting outcomes from conversational dynamics within the first 5 minutes,” Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 802–811, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. G. B. Huang, M. Ramesh, T. Berg, and E. Learned-Miller, “Labeled faces in the wild: a database for studying face recognition in unconstrained environments,” Tech. Rep. 07-49, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Mass, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  64. V. Jain and E. G. Learned-Miller, “FDDB: a benchmark for face detection in unconstrained settings,” UMass Amherst Technical Report, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  65. C. Sagonas, G. Tzimiropoulos, S. Zafeiriou, and M. Pantic, “300 Faces in-the-wild challenge: the first facial landmark localization challenge,” in Proceedings of the 14th IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops (ICCVW '13), pp. 397–403, Sydney, Australia, December 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. J. Shen, S. Zafeiriou, G. G. Chrysos, J. Kossaifi, G. Tzimiropoulos, and M. Pantic, “The first facial landmark tracking in-the-wild challenge: benchmark and results,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision Workshop (ICCVW '15), pp. 1003–1011, Santiago, Chile, December 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  67. I. J. Goodfellow, D. Erhan, P. Luc Carrier et al., “Challenges in representation learning: a report on three machine learning contests,” Neural Networks, vol. 64, pp. 59–63, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Dhall, R. Goecke, J. Joshi, M. Wagner, and T. Gedeon, “Emotion recognition in the wild challenge 2013,” in Proceedings of the 15th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '13), pp. 509–516, ACM, Sydney, Australia, December 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. A. Dhall, R. Goecke, J. Joshi, K. Sikka, and T. Gedeon, “Emotion recognition in the wild challenge 2014: baseline, data and protocol,” in Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '14), pp. 461–466, ACM, Istanbul, Turkey, November 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. A. Dhall, O. Ramana Murthy, R. Goecke, J. Joshi, and T. Gedeon, “Video and image based emotion recognition challenges in the wild: Emotiw 2015,” in Proceedings of the 2015 ACM on International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (ICMI '15), pp. 423–426, ACM, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2015.
  71. S. Zafeiriou, A. Papaioannou, I. Kotsia, M. A. Nicolaou, and G. Zhao, “Facial affect ‘in-the-wild’: a survey and a new database,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR '16) Workshops, Affect “In-the-Wild” Workshop, June 2016.
  72. P. Over, G. M. Awad, J. Fiscus et al., TRECVID 2010—An Overview of the Goals, Tasks, Data, Evaluation Mechanisms, and Metrics, 2011.
  73. J. L. Lemke, “Analyzing verbal data: principles, methods, and problems,” in Second International Handbook of Science Education, vol. 24, pp. 1471–1484, Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  74. J. J. Godfrey, E. C. Holliman, and J. McDaniel, “Switchboard, telephone speech corpus for research and development,” in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASP '92), vol. 1, pp. 517–520, San Francisco, Calif, USA, March 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. D. O. Olguın, P. A. Gloor, and A. S. Pentland, “Capturing individual and group behavior with wearable sensors,” in Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on Human Behavior Modeling, SSS, vol. 9, Stanford, Calif, USA, March 2009.
  76. J. Staiano, B. Lepri, N. Aharony, F. Pianesi, N. Sebe, and A. Pentland, “Friends don't Lie— Inferring personality traits from social network structure,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '12), pp. 321–330, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA, September 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. A. Vinciarelli and A. S. Pentland, “New social signals in a new interaction world: the next frontier for social signal processing,” IEEE Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Magazine, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 10–17, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. M. Raento, A. Oulasvirta, and N. Eagle, “Smartphones: an emerging tool for social scientists,” Sociological Methods & Research, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 426–454, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. M. Minelli, M. Chambers, and A. Dhiraj, Big Data, Big Analytics: Emerging Business Intelligence and Analytic Trends for Today's Businesses, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2012.
  80. K.-H. Chang, D. Fisher, J. Canny, and B. Hartmann, “How's my mood and stress?: an efficient speech analysis library for unobtrusive monitoring on mobile phones,” in Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Body Area Networks (BodyNets '11), pp. 71–77, Beijng, China, November 2011.
  81. A. Wendemuth and S. Biundo, “A companion technology for cognitive technical systems,” in Cognitive Behavioural Systems, A. Esposito, A. M. Esposito, A. Vinciarelli, R. Hoffmann, and V. C. Müller, Eds., vol. 7403 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 89–103, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. Y. Wilks, “Artificial companions as a new kind of interface to the future internet,” Research Report 13, Oxford Internet Institute, Oxford, UK, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  83. Y. Wilks, “Artificial companions,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Machine Learning for Multimodal Interaction, pp. 36–45, Springer, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  84. R. A. Calvo and S. D'Mello, “Affect detection: an interdisciplinary review of models, methods, and their applications,” IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 18–37, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. H. Gunes and B. Schuller, “Categorical and dimensional affect analysis in continuous input: current trends and future directions,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 120–136, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. A. Vlachostergiou, G. Caridakis, and S. Kollias, “Context in affective multiparty and multimodal interaction: why, which, how and where?” in Proceedings of the ACM Workshop on Understanding and Modeling Multiparty, Multimodal Interactions, pp. 3–8, Istanbul, Turkey, November 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. D. Gatica-Perez, “Automatic nonverbal analysis of social interaction in small groups: a review,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1775–1787, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. M. Yang, R. Bock, D. Zhang et al., “do you like a cup of ‘coffee?’-the casia coffee house corpus,” in Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Multimodal Corpora (MMC '16), pp. 13–16, IEEE, Portoroz, Slovenia, May 2016.
  89. A. Vinciarelli, M. Pantic, and H. Bourlard, “Social signal processing: survey of an emerging domain,” Image and Vision Computing, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 1743–1759, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. H. C. Traue, F. Ohl, A. Brechmann et al., “A framework for emotions and dispositions in man-companion interaction,” in Chapter in Coverbal Synchrony in Human-Machine Interaction, M. Rojc and N. Campbell, Eds., pp. 99–140, Science, New Hampshire, NH, USA, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  91. R. Akerkar, Big Data Computing, CRC Press, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  92. A. C.-R. Tsai, C.-E. Wu, R. T.-H. Tsai, and J. Y.-J. Hsu, “Building a concept-level sentiment dictionary based on commonsense knowledge,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 22–30, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. S. Poria, A. Gelbukh, A. Hussain, N. Howard, D. Das, and S. Bandyopadhyay, “Enhanced senticnet with affective labels for concept-based opinion mining,” Intelligent Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 31–38, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  94. C. Hung and H.-K. Lin, “Using objective words in sentiwordnet to improve word-of-mouth sentiment classification,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 47–54, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. C. Bosco, V. Patti, and A. Bolioli, “Developing corpora for sentiment analysis: the case of irony and senti-TUT,” IEEE Intelligent Systems, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 55–63, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. A. McEwen and H. Cassimally, Designing the Internet of Things, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA, 2013.
  97. J. Bosch and P. M. Bosch-Sijtsema, “Softwares product lines, global development and ecosystems: collaboration in software engineering,” in Collaborative Software Engineering, I. Mistrík, J. Grundy, A. Hoek, and J. Whitehead, Eds., pp. 77–92, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  98. S. Jansen, A. Finkelstein, and S. Brinkkemper, “A sense of community: a research agenda for software ecosystems,” in Proceedings of the In 31st International Conference on Software Engineering-Companion, pp. 187–190, IEEE, Vancouver, Canada, May 2009.
  99. W3C OWL Working Group, “OWL 2 web ontology language: document overview,” W3C Recommendation, 2009, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/. View at Google Scholar
  100. Stanford University, “Protégé,” April 2015, http://protege.stanford.edu/.
  101. I. Horrocks, P. F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean, “Swrl: a semantic web rule language combining owl and ruleml,” W3C Member Submission, vol. 21, article 79, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  102. B. Parsia and E. Sirin, “Pellet: a practical OWL-DL reasoner,” in Proceedings of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference-Poster, vol. 18, Citeceer, 2004.
  103. F. LAB, Fiware lab, April 2015, http://www.fi-ware.org/lab/.
  104. F. Ops, Fiware, April 2015, https://www.fi-xifi.eu/fiware-ops/service-offer-management.html.