Table of Contents
Journal of Ecosystems
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 726594, 16 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/726594
Research Article

Spatial Assessment of a Biocriteria Applied to Texas Tidal Streams

1Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 6300 Ocean Drive, NRC 2501, Corpus Christi, TX 78412, USA
2Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, 4200 Smith School Road, Austin, TX 78744, USA

Received 2 May 2013; Revised 20 August 2013; Accepted 24 August 2013

Academic Editor: Henry M. Page

Copyright © 2013 James M. Tolan and Janet M. Nelson. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. B. C. Pease, “A spatially oriented analysis of estuaries and their associated commercial fisheries in New South Wales, Australia,” Fisheries Research, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp. 67–86, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. M. Tolan, “Larval fish assemblage response to freshwater inflows: a synthesis of five years of ichthyoplankton monitoring within Nueces bay, Texas,” Bulletin of Marine Science, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 275–296, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. R. P. Vasconcelos, P. Reis-Santos, A. Maia et al., “Nursery use patterns of commercially important marine fish species in estuarine systems along the Portuguese coast,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 613–624, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. K. Wieski, H. Guo, C. B. Craft, and S. C. Pennings, “Ecosystem functions of tidal fresh, brackish, and salt marshes on the Georgia coast,” Estuaries and Coasts, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 161–169, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. TCEQ, “2010 Texas Integrated Report—Texas 303(d) List (Category 5),” The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality website, 2011, http://www.tceq.texas.gov/assets/public/compliance/monops/water/10twqi/2010_303d.pdf.
  6. D. Nicolas, J. Lobry, O. Le Pape, and P. Boët, “Functional diversity in European estuaries: relating the composition of fish assemblages to the abiotic environment,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 88, no. 3, pp. 329–338, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. C. Contreras, J. Nelson, and J. Tolan, “Proposed methodology for determining site-specific uses and criteria within tidally influenced portions of the River Basin and Coastal Basin waters of texas,” Contract 582-2-48657, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  8. TCEQ, “Texas Surface Water Quality Standards,” Tech. Rep. 307. 1-107. 10., 2000. View at Google Scholar
  9. S. Marshall and M. Elliott, “Environmental influences on the fish assemblage of the Humber estuary, UK,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 175–184, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. A. McQuatters-Gollop, A. J. Gilbert, L. D. Mee et al., “How well do ecosystem indicators communicate the effects of anthropogenic eutrophication?” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 82, no. 4, pp. 583–596, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Nicolas, J. Lobry, M. Lepage et al., “Fish under influence: a macroecological analysis of relations between fish species richness and environmental gradients among European tidal estuaries,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 137–147, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. M. Tolan, “Coast-wide assessment of Texas tidal stream communities,” Contract 582-8-80180, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  13. G. J. Guillen, Development of a rapid bioassessment method and index of biotic intergrity for tidal streams and bayous located along the Northwest Gulf of Mexico [Ph.D. thesis], Texas Natural Resource Conservation Commission, 1996.
  14. APA (Alan Plummer Associates), “Determination of aquatic life use classification nueces river tidal,” Final Report, City of Corpus Christi, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Contreras and A. Whisenant, “Cow bayou tidal (Segment 0511) use attainability analysis,” Contract 582-2-48657, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  16. J. Tolan, J. Nelson, N. Kuhn, and D. German, “Final report for determining site-specific uses and criteria within the tidally influenced portions of tres palacios river and garcitas creek,” Contract 582-2-48657, Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  17. K. R. Clarke and R. M. Warwick, Change in Marine Communities: An Approach to Statistical Analysis and Interpretation, PRIMER-E, Plymouth, UK, 2nd edition, 2001.
  18. C. J. Walters and J. S. Collie, “Is research on environmental factors useful to fisheries management?” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1848–1854, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. Sosa-Lopez and D. Mouillot, “Spatiotemporal segregation regulates species richness along biomass gradients in estuarine fish assemblages,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 342, pp. 217–226, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. N. M. Bacheler, L. M. Paramore, J. A. Buckel, and J. E. Hightower, “Abiotic and biotic factors influence the habitat use of an estuarine fish,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 377, pp. 263–277, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. B. P. Piazza and M. K. La Peyre, “Nekton community response to a large-scale Mississippi River discharge: examining spatial and temporal response to river management,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 379–387, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. A. Wiens, “Spatial scaling in ecology,” Functional Ecology, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 385–397, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. A. Levin, “The problem of pattern and scale in ecology,” Ecology, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1943–1967, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. J. Kennard, J. D. Olden, A. H. Arthington, B. J. Pusey, and N. L. Poff, “Multiscale effects of flow regime and habitat and their interaction on fish assemblage structure in eastern Australia,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1346–1359, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. H. F. Wilson and M. A. Xenopoulos, “Landscape influences on stream fish assemblages across spatial scales in a northern Great Plains ecoregion,” Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 245–257, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. M. A. Palmer, “Reforming watershed restoration: science in need of application and applications in need of science,” Estuaries and Coasts, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 1–17, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. G. A. Rose and W. C. Leggett, “The importance of scale to predator-prey spatial correlations: an example of Atlantic fishes,” Ecology, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. E. Núñez-Lara, J. E. Arias-González, and P. Legendre, “Spatial patterns of Yucatan reef fish communities: testing models using a multi-scale survey design,” Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, vol. 324, no. 2, pp. 157–169, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. H. Hillebrand, “Strength, slope and variability of marine latitudinal gradients,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 273, pp. 251–267, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. T. D. Harrison and A. K. Whitfield, “Estuarine typology and the structuring of fish communities in South Africa,” Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 269–293, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. J. M. Tolan and J. M. Nelson, “Relationships among nekton assemblage structure and abiotic conditions in three Texas tidal streams,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 159, no. 1–4, pp. 15–34, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. S. França, M. J. Costa, and H. N. Cabral, “Inter- and intra-estuarine fish assemblage variability patterns along the Portuguese coast,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 91, no. 2, pp. 262–271, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. S. Akin, E. Buhan, K. O. Winemiller, and H. Yilmaz, “Fish assemblage structure of Koycegiz Lagoon-Estuary, Turkey: spatial and temporal distribution patterns in relation to environmental variation,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 671–684, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. A. D. Jassby, W. J. Kimmerer, S. G. Monismith et al., “Isohaline position as a habitat indicator for estuarine populations,” Ecological Applications, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 272–289, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. E. J. Martino and K. W. Able, “Fish assemblages across the marine to low salinity transition zone of a temperate estuary,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 56, no. 5-6, pp. 969–987, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. L. P. Rozas and C. T. Hackney, “Use of oligohaline marshes by fishes and macrofaunal crustaceans in North Carolina,” Estuaries, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 213–224, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. M. S. Peterson and S. T. Ross, “Dynamics of littoral fishes and decapods along a coastal river-estuarine gradient,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 467–483, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. D. M. Baltz, C. Rakocinski, and J. W. Fleeger, “Microhabitat use by marsh-edge fishes in a Louisiana estuary,” Environmental Biology of Fishes, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 109–126, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. M. V. Ogburn Matthews and D. M. Allen, “Interactions among some dominant estuarine nekton species,” Estuaries, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 840–850, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. L. P. Rozas and T. J. Minello, “Restoring coastal habitat using marsh terracing: the effect of cell size on nekton use,” Wetlands, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 595–609, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. M. E. Pattillo, T. E. Czapla, D. M. Nelson, and M. E. Monaco, “Distribution and abundance of fishes and invertebrates in Gulf of Mexico estuaries, volume II: species life history summaries,” ELMR Report no. 11, NOAA/NOS Strategic, Environmental Assessments Division, Silver Spring, Md, USA, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  42. H. Remmert, “Studies and thoughts about the zonation along the rocky shores of the Baltic,” Zoologica, vol. 22, pp. 121–125, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  43. F. E. Clements, “Nature and structure of the climax,” Ecology, vol. 24, pp. 252–284, 1936. View at Google Scholar
  44. H. Caswell, “Community structure: a neural model analysis,” Ecological Monographs, vol. 46, pp. 327–354, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  45. R. J. Livingston, G. J. Kobylinski, F. G. Lewis III, and P. F. Sheridan, “Long-term fluctuations of epibenthic fish and invertebrate populations in Apalachicola Bay,” Florida Fishery Bulletin, vol. 74, pp. 311–322, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  46. S. T. Ross, R. H. McMichael Jr., and D. L. Ruple, “Seasonal and diel variation in the standing crop of fishes and macroinvertebrates from a Gulf of Mexico surf zone,” Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 391–412, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. T. P. Glancy, T. K. Frazer, C. E. Cichra, and W. J. Lindberg, “Comparative patterns of occupancy by Decapod Crustaceans in Seagrass, oyster, and marsh-edge Habitats in a Northeast Gulf of Mexico Estuary,” Estuaries and Coasts, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1291–1301, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. W. D. N. Busch, M. Treadwell, L. Ross, and R. S. Jones, “A summary of progress and challenges in the use of an ecosystem-based approach for marine resource management,” in Proceedings of the Mini-Symposium, p. 24, U.S. House of Representatives, Washington, DC, USA, 2002.
  49. L. A. Deegan, J. T. Finn, S. G. Ayvazian, C. A. Ryder-Kieffer, and J. Buonaccorsi, “Development and validation of an estuarine biotic integrity index,” Estuaries, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 601–617, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. K. A. Rose, “Why are quantitative relationships between environmental quality and fish populations so elusive?” Ecological Applications, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 367–385, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. J. E. Cloern, “Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem,” Marine Ecology Progress Series, vol. 210, pp. 223–253, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. D. J. Conley, S. Markager, J. Andersen, T. Ellermann, and L. M. Svendsen, “Coastal eutrophication and the Danish National Aquatic Monitoring and Assessment Program,” Estuaries, vol. 25, no. 4 B, pp. 848–861, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. C. Rönnberg and E. Bonsdorff, “Baltic sea eutrophication: area-specific ecological consequences,” Hydrobiologia, vol. 514, pp. 227–241, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. G. B. Jones, P. Mercurio, and F. Olivier, “Zinc in fish, crabs, oysters, and mangrove flora and fauna from Cleveland Bay,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 41, no. 7-12, pp. 345–352, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. J. H. Andersen, L. Schlüter, and G. Aertebjerg, “Coastal eutrophication: recent developments in definitions and implications for monitoring strategies,” Journal of Plankton Research, vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 621–628, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. F.-L. Xu, J.-Y. Hao, S. Tao, R. W. Dawson, K. C. Lam, and Y. D. Chen, “Restoration of marine coastal ecosystem health as a new goal for integrated catchment management in Tolo Harbor, Hong Kong, China,” Environmental Management, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 540–552, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. E. Padmini and B. V. Geetha, “A comparative seasonal pollution assessment study on Ennore Estuary with respect to metal accumulation in the grey mullet, Mugil cephalus,” Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 91–103, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. T. Clark, K. Clark, S. Paterson, D. Mackay, and R. J. Norstrom, “Wildlife monitoring, modeling, and fugacity,” Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 120–127, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus