Research Article
A Thermodynamic Analysis of Two Competing Mid-Sized Oxyfuel Combustion Combined Cycles
Table 2
Cycle performance for the Graz cycle from earlier papers.
| Paper | Year | ASU kW/(kg/s) | Output MW | TIT ∘C | PR | % |
| [21] | 2002 | 1080 | 92.251 | 1400 | 40 | 57.51 | [22] | 2003 | 900 | 92.251 | 1400 | 40 | 55 | [30] | 2004 | 972 | 400 | 1328 | 40 | 42.8 | [26] | 2005 | 1355 | 100 | 1400 | 40 | 55.3 | [24] | 2005 | 900 | 92.2 | 1312 | 40 | 52.5 | [32] | 2007 | 812 | 400 | 1328 | 40 | 48.6 | [28] | 2008 | | 403 | 1400 | 40 | 53.12 | [29] | 2008 | 1225 | 597 | 1500 | 50 | 54.14 | [33] | 2008 | 1225 | 400 | 1400 | 40 | 53.09 | [35] | 2012 | 1225 | 106 | 1400 | 44.7 | 49 |
|
|
Delivery pressure from ASU is the operating pressure. Delivery pressure from ASU is 1 bar. Energy cost for CO2 compression not taken into account.
|