Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Energy
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 4107614, 13 pages
Review Article

Japan’s 2014 Strategic Energy Plan: A Planned Energy System Transition

Graduate School of Energy Science, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan

Correspondence should be addressed to Jeffrey B. Kucharski

Received 13 February 2017; Accepted 11 May 2017; Published 12 June 2017

Academic Editor: Umberto Desideri

Copyright © 2017 Jeffrey B. Kucharski and Hironobu Unesaki. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. METI, “Cabinet Decision on the New Strategic Energy Plan 2014,”, 2016.
  2. J. S. Duffield and B. Woodall, “Japan's new basic energy plan,” Energy Policy, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 3741–3749, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Y. Kobayashi, “Enhancing energy resilience: challenging tasks for japans energy policy,” Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2014.
  4. D. V. Vivoda, Energy Security in Japan: Challenges After Fukushima, Ashgate, 2014.
  5. V. Vivoda and G. Graetz, “Nuclear policy and regulation in japan after fukushima: navigating the crisis,” Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 490–509, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. K. Koyama, “Japan's post-fukushima energy policy challenges,” Asian Economic Policy Review, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 274–293, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. J. Meltzer, After fukushima: what’s next for japan’s energy and climate change policy?2011.
  8. P. J. Scalise, “Hard choices: Japan’s post-fukushima energy policy in the 21st century,” in Natural Disaster and Nuclear Crisis in Japan, J. Kingston, Ed., Routledge, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  9. V. Vivoda, “Japan's energy security predicament post-Fukushima,” Energy Policy, vol. 46, pp. 135–143, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Hayashi and L. Hughes, “The policy responses to the Fukushima nuclear accident and their effect on Japanese energy security,” Energy Policy, vol. 59, pp. 86–101, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. Harada, T. Ichikawa, H. Takagi, and H. Uchida, “14-Building a hydrogen infrastructure in Japan A2 - Veziroğlu, Michael BallAngelo BasileT,” in Compendium of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 4, pp. 321–335, Woodhead, Oxford, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  12. N. Behling, M. C. Williams, and S. Managi, “Fuel cells and the hydrogen revolution: Analysis of a strategic plan in Japan,” Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 48, pp. 204–221, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Kuramochi, “Review of energy and climate policy developments in Japan before and after Fukushima,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 43, pp. 1320–1332, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. Wakiyama, E. Zusman, and J. E. Monogan III, “Can a low-carbon-energy transition be sustained in post-Fukushima Japan? Assessing the varying impacts of exogenous shocks,” Energy Policy, vol. 73, pp. 654–666, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. S. Cornot-Gandolphe and C. Mathieu, “Japan’s Energy and Climate Policy: Towards Dispelling the Uncertainties. Institut Francais des Relations Internationales (IFRI),” 2015.
  16. T. N. Srinivasan and T. S. Gopi Rethinaraj, “Fukushima and thereafter: Reassessment of risks of nuclear power,” Energy Policy, vol. 52, pp. 726–736, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. H. Rohracher, “Transforming energy systems toward sustainability: critical issues from a socio-technical perspective,” Int J Environ Technol Manag, vol. 9, pp. 144–161, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  18. A. Rip and R. Kemp, Technological change, Battelle Press, 1998.
  19. F. W. Geels, “Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study,” Research Policy, vol. 31, no. 8-9, pp. 1257–1274, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. F. W. Geels, “From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory,” Research Policy, vol. 33, no. 6-7, pp. 897–920, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J-P. Voss and B. Bornemann, “The politics of reflexive governance: challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management,” in Ecol Soc, vol. 16, 9 edition, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Meadowcroft, “What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions,” Policy Sciences, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 323–340, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. V. Smil, Energy transitions: history, requirements, prospects, vol. 1, ABC-CLIO, prospects, 2010.
  24. F. Berkhout, A. Smith, and A. Stirling, “Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts,” Syst Innov Transit Sustain Theory Evid Policy Edw Elgar Chelten, pp. 48–75, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Smith, A. Stirling, and F. Berkhout, “The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions,” Research Policy, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1491–1510, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Simmie and R. Martin, “The economic resilience of regions: towards an evolutionary approach,” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 27–43, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. F. W. Geels and J. Schot, “Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways,” Research Policy, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 399–417, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. H. Heclo, Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden, Yale University Press, 2nd edition, 1974.
  29. P. M. Sacks, G. A. Dorfman, W. Grant et al., “State structure and the asymmetrical society: an approach to public policy in britain,” Comparative Politics, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 349, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. P. A. Hall, “Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain,” Comparative Politics, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 275–296, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. P. Andrews-Speed, “The Institutions of Energy Governance in China,” in Cent Energy Pet Miner Law Policy, pp. 1–49, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  32. D. Helm, The New Energy Paradigm, Oxford University Press, 2007.
  33. METI, “New National Energy Strategy. Agency for Natural Resources and Energy,” Japan; 2006.
  34. S. Itoh, “Japan’s energy strategy and development of energy cooperation in the Asia-pacific,” in ERINA Rep, vol. 77, pp. 35–48, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  35. METI, “METI’s mission. Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan (METI),” 2014.
  36. Cabinet Office (Kantei) of Japan, Japan Revitalization Strategy (2015 revision), Cabinet Office, Government of Japan, 2015.
  37. METI, “Long-term Energy Supply and Demand Outlook (Energy mix targets),” Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan (METI); 2015.
  38. METI, METI FY2015 Budget 2015. (accessed February 8, 2016).
  39. Kankyō Business Online. Ministry of the Environment requesting an increase of 62% in its FY 2016 budget for energy conservation and renewable energy (Japanese) 環境ビジネスオンライン 2015. (accessed February 13, 2016).
  40. A. Shimbun, Asahi Shimbun poll 2011 (accessed July 22, 2015).
  41. A. Shimbun, 80% distrust government’s nuke safety measures 2012. (accessed May 10, 2015).
  42. A. Shimbun, (accessed July 22, 2015).
  43. Consumers Union of Japan, CUJ Resolutions at the 42nd Annual Meeting in June, 2015 | Consumers Union of Japan 2015. (accessed April 25, 2017).
  44. Consumers Union. Do Not Shift Nuclear Power Plant Related Costs to Our Electricity Bills | Consumers Union of Japan 2017. (accessed April 25, 2017).
  45. R. Kilisek, “"Policy Costs" Impact Japan’s International Competitiveness. Break Energy, 2014,” Energy “Policy Costs” Impact Japan’s International Competitiveness. Break Energy 2014. (accessed April 25, 2017).
  46. Carbon Pulse. Japan business lobby wants scaled-back renewables target in 2030 plan | Carbon Pulse 2015. (accessed February 12, 2016).
  47. METI, Major discussion points toward the establishment of a new "Basic Energy Plan for Japan." Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan (METI), 2011.
  48. METI, Annual Report on Energy, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan (METI), 2013.
  49. METI, Report of the Electricity System Reform Expert Subcommittee, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry of Japan (METI), 2013.
  50. ANRE, “Japan’s Electricity Market Deregulation,” METI (ANRE), 2015.
  51. IEEJ, IEEJ e-Newsletter, No. 29, 2014.
  52. Japan for Sustainability, New Power Companies Soar in Japan in 2014, Increase of 1.8 times from 2013. JFS Jpn Sustain 2015, (accessed February 13, 2016).
  53. Japan Times, “Power retail deregulation,” Jpn Times 2016.
  54. Nikkei Asian Review. Japan’s electricity deregulation: 54,000 clients jump to other power companies. Nikkei Asian Rev 2016.
  55. Renewable Energy Institute, Renewable Energy Institute 2017, (accessed April 26, 2017).
  56. M. Aoki and G. Rothwell, A Comparative Institutional Analysis of the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster: Lessons and Policy Implications, Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY, USA, 2012.
  57. R. J. Samuels, Disaster and Change in Japan, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY, USA, 2013.