Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Energy
Volume 2019, Article ID 4531497, 17 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/4531497
Research Article

Sizing and Dynamic Modeling of a Power System for the MUN Explorer Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Using a Fuel Cell and Batteries

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada
2Department of Electrical Engineering, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL, Canada
3Department of Automation and Controls, University of West Scotland, Scotland, UK

Correspondence should be addressed to Mohamed M. Albarghot; ac.num@612amm

Received 5 January 2019; Accepted 27 February 2019; Published 16 April 2019

Academic Editor: Johan E. Hustad

Copyright © 2019 Mohamed M. Albarghot et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The combination of a fuel cell and batteries has promising potential for powering autonomous vehicles. The MUN Explorer Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) is built to do mapping-type missions of seabeds as well as survey missions. These missions require a great deal of power to reach underwater depths (i.e., 3000 meters). The MUN Explorer uses 11 rechargeable Lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries as the main power source with a total capacity of 14.6 kWh to 17.952 kWh, and the vehicle can run for 10 hours. The drawbacks of operating the existing power system of the MUN Explorer, which was done by the researcher at the Holyrood management facility, include mobilization costs, logistics and transport, and facility access, all of which should be taken into consideration. Recharging the batteries for at least 8 hours is also very challenging and time consuming. To overcome these challenges and run the MUN Explorer for a long time, it is essential to integrate a fuel cell into an existing power system (i.e., battery bank). The integration of the fuel cell not only will increase the system power, but will also reduce the number of batteries needed as suggested by HOMER software. In this paper, an integrated fuel cell is designed to be added into the MUN Explorer AUV along with a battery bank system to increase its power system. The system sizing is performed using HOMER software. The results from HOMER software show that a 1-kW fuel cell and 8 Li-ion batteries can increase the power system capacity to 68 kWh. The dynamic model is then built in MATLAB/Simulink environment to provide a better understanding of the system behavior. The 1-kW fuel cell is connected to a DC/DC Boost Converter to increase the output voltage from 24 V to 48 V as required by the battery and DC motor. A hydrogen gas tank is also included in the model. The advantage of installing the hydrogen and oxygen tanks beside the batteries is that it helps the buoyancy force in underwater depths. The design of this system is based on MUN Explorer data sheets and system dynamic simulation results.

1. Introduction

The MUN Explorer AUV is an autonomous underwater vehicle used for missions such as mapping, surveillance, oceanographic data gathering, environmental monitoring, mine detecting, and coastal defence [1]. One of the challenges facing the MUN Explorer is the power system’s capacity to complete its missions. To improve the system’s energy capacity, the MUN Explorer AUV is taken as a real example to do sizing and to build a dynamic model. The MUN AUV has a length of 5.3 m, a diameter of 0.69 m, and a dry weight of 820 kg. In water, the flooded front and back sections of the AUV make the mass around 1400 Kg, with an average speed of 1.5 m/s, graphing over 80 Km. Some components have also been integrated into the vehicle such as computers and sensors.

Hydrogen production by Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) water electrolysis is a promising method that has been successfully developed and integrated into renewable and hydrogen energy-based systems. Renewable energy sources, such as solar and wind, are desirable for hydrogen production due to random variations and significant current density capabilities [2]. PEM water electrolysis technology that generates hydrogen primarily emits water moisture, nitrogen, and oxygen [3]. Energy storage or backup power systems are needed for photovoltaic and wind energy systems due to their discontinuous energy production. Batteries can be a good solution for daily storage but not for seasonal storage due to self-discharge. Storing energy in the form of hydrogen gas that is generated from renewable sources is a possible solution for both daily and seasonal storage [4]. For example, Sopian et al. (2009) integrated a photovoltaic-wind-hydrogen energy production/storage system. The components of the system were a photovoltaic array, wind turbine, PEM electrolyzer, battery bank, and hydrogen tank. The system also had an automatic control system for battery charging and discharging. A hydrogen quantity of 130 ml/min to 140 ml/min was generated for an average global solar radiation between 200 W/m2 and 800 W/m2 and wind velocities ranging from 2.0 m/s to 5.0 m/s. For each system component, a mathematical model was built and compared to the experimental results [5]. Lithium–ion (Li-ion) battery technology has improved in the past decade. Li-ion batteries have higher energy and power density, higher efficiency, and lower self-discharge when compared to other batteries (NiCd, NiMH, and Lead Acid). To ensure the Li-ion battery is operating at a proper temperature and state of charge (SOC), a battery management supervision system (BMSS) must be applied [6]. Fuel cells’ high energy density, quiet operation, and high efficiency have allowed them to be used as a portable energy source. The capacity of fuel cells increased worldwide from 65 MW in 2009 to 181 MW in 2014 [7, 8]. Many types of fuel cells such as the proton exchange membrane fuel cell, alkaline fuel cell, and phosphoric acid fuel cell use hydrogen as fuel to produce electricity and water. Hydrogen-specific energy is high compared to other fuels’ specific energy. Fuel cells have many applications such as stationary, transportation, and portable applications. Proton exchange membrane fuel cells have a higher efficiency compared to phosphoric acid fuel cells and alkaline fuel cells [9].

Using compressed hydrogen in composite cylinders for fuel cells is an alternative for underwater vehicles. Composite cylinders have a low weight and can increase the total performance of a deep-diving AUV. Furthermore, hydrogen cylinders may help buoyancy compensation in underwater depths. The design for underwater depths makes the weight of the pressure hull increase, and as a result, the amount of energy carried in a vehicle with neutral buoyancy is minimized with the design depth. Considering this, the batteries inside the vehicle should be as light as possible [10]. AUV energy supply powered by a fuel cell has been integrated on an IFREMER survey AUV called IDEFX by HELION, an AREVA Renewable subsidiary. Several experiments have demonstrated the interest in underwater power sources by installing a fuel cell along with a hydrogen gas tank [11].

This paper aims to design, size, and integrate a fuel cell into an existing power system that uses a battery bank as the main energy source to power the MUN Explorer AUV. By adding a fuel cell into the MUN Explorer, the power system capacity will be increased. However, the weight and the number of batteries can be reduced accordingly, and the number of hours of operation will increase. In this work, the focus will be on the main four components: the oxygen and hydrogen tanks, PEM fuel cell, Li-ion battery, and DC motor (load). This paper is divided into three sections: the first section illustrates the components and system sizing using Hybrid Optimization Model for Electrical Renewable (HOMER) software; the second section demonstrates the dynamic modeling, simulation, and results; and the third section is the conclusion.

2. Components and System Sizing

2.1. Hydrogen/Oxygen Tanks and PEM Fuel Cell

The MUN Explorer Autonomous Underwater Vehicle as shown in Figure 1 has plenty of vacant space that could be used to install the hydrogen and oxygen tanks as well as the fuel cell.

Figure 1: Hull structure of the MUN Explorer AUV.

The hydrogen consumed by the proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) can be generated directly from the electrolyzer. The hydrogen gas also depends on the relationship between the output power and the hydrogen needed for the PEMFC system. Excess hydrogen is directed to the storage tank. Due to the lack of an oxygen gas underwater surface, the fuel cell operation in underwater vehicles requires oxygen gas storage to complete the reaction between the cathode and the anode. By carrying the oxygen into the AUV, the fuel cell performance is increased by 2 to 3 times. To remove the produced water from the fuel cell during the operation, extra oxygen must be brought into the vehicle. This should be measured when the sizing of the oxygen storage is completed [16]. There are many ways to store hydrogen and oxygen. For example, compressed gas or liquid hydrogen and oxygen can be applied. HOMER software is designed to deal with renewable/nonrenewable energy components and integrate them with each other. HOMER works by providing inputs (i.e., capital cost and size to consider kW) and design information about any given power system. HOMER simulation will give the system configurations and then create a list of feasible system designs and sort that list according to cost-effectiveness. Finally, a sensitivity analysis can be performed. The complete HOMER block diagram is illustrated in Figure 2.

Figure 2: HOMER block diagram.

This diagram consists of renewable energy sources such as solar and wind to generate electricity to power the electrolyzer and then charge the battery. After that, the electrolyzer will generate the hydrogen and oxygen gases. Finally, the fuel cell and the battery will power the DC motor. It is understood that the wind energy, solar energy, and electrolyzer will be onshore, and hydrogen and oxygen will be transferred to the AUV when it is docked. To run the HOMER software, the capital cost (i.e., commercial prices) of three different hydrogen tanks along with the sizes to consider (kg or kW) need to be entered into the hydrogen tank inputs. However, the reason for selecting three or more different hydrogen tanks is to give HOMER software more options to choose from so it can select the most optimal results. The same procedure is done for the fuel cell inputs, electrolyzer inputs, battery inputs, convertor inputs, PV inputs, and wind turbine inputs. The data sheet of each input and its price can be found in the attached Appendix. Figure 3 shows the simulation result of HOMER software in terms of the hydrogen tank storage level in kg and monthly statistics as well as frequency histogram. Since HOMER software does not have an oxygen tank input, the sizing will only be performed analytically in the next sections. After the capital cost and sizes to consider (0.2kW, 0.3kW, and 0.5kW) have been set for the fuel cell inputs, the simulation runs to give the results as shown in Figure 4. The values in the gray line have been chosen from HOMER software. The FC results are shown in Figure 5.

Figure 3: Simulation results from HOMER software for the hydrogen tank.
Figure 4: Suggested results simulation by HOMER software.
Figure 5: HOMER software results for the fuel cell inputs.
2.2. Lithium-Ion Battery and Converter

The MUN Explorer uses Li-ion batteries as its main source of energy to power loads, which include all electronics onboard and the emergency lights. That is because these batteries have high energy density and efficiency compared to other types of batteries. A Li-ion battery is more attractive in portable applications such as automotive and autonomous vehicles.

The cost of the Li-ion batteries and size to consider (i.e., number of batteries) have been entered into HOMER software inputs. Figure 6 shows the battery characteristic results. The battery has a nominal voltage of 48 V and nominal capacity of 34 Ah. The DC bus of the system is set to be 48 V, which means the battery also must be 48 V. Those characteristics were provided by the battery’s data sheet as well. The DC/DC boost converter is well known as a step-up converter, which takes a lower voltage to a higher voltage. The HOMER results suggested that a 2 kW DC/DC converter should be used in the system. The efficiency of a DC/DC converter is always above 90%, and it has a lifetime up to 15 years.

Figure 6: HOMER software results for the battery.
2.3. Permanent Magnetic DC Motor (PMDC)

In this case, the PMDC motor represents the load in HOMER software, and it is powered by the fuel cell and the battery. Permanent magnetic direct current (PMDC) motors are electrical machines that convert direct current electrical energy into mechanical energy. They are commonly used in many industrial, residential, and commercial applications [18]. The MUN Explorer AUV runs for ten hours, so that the load has been specified based on the hours of operations (i.e., 10 hours) to be 600 W as illustrated in Figure 7. The load is also divided into two sections: a DC load, which represents the electronics onboard, and the AC load, which is a variable speed motor. The MUN Explorer has only DC components, so the reason for selecting AC in HOMER is to represent the motor drive in our sizing.

Figure 7: The load for the DC motor in HOMER.

3. System Dynamic Model

3.1. Hydrogen/Oxygen Tank and PEM Fuel Cell

The storage system in the MUN Explorer could be challenging to install. As mentioned above, there are many ways to store compressed or liquid hydrogen and oxygen, especially for the MUN Explorer applications. Compressed or liquid hydrogen and oxygen storage gases can be implemented in terms of specific energies and energy densities. Effective storage systems that have higher energy density (ED) and specific energy (SE) are preferred [16].

The advantages of compressed hydrogen do not need preprocessing and are the easiest and cheapest solution for dealing with fuel storage. However, to maximize hydrogen content, high pressures (up to 700 bar) can be applied due to the low energy density of hydrogen gas. Liquid hydrogen has a higher density than gas. Liquid hydrogen also needs a temperature that is less than 20.15 K, so the stored liquid hydrogen must be in cryogenic Dewars (multi-shell flasks using an evacuated interstitial space) to eliminate heat transfer throughout the flask and prevent gas from reaching the boiling stage. Table 1 shows the specific energy and the energy density for compressed and liquid hydrogen storage systems, respectively [16].

Table 1: Hydrogen storage system for SE and ED.

Lightweight tanks for transporting the compressed oxygen applications are more accessible than the hydrogen ones because hydrogen tanks are used in automotive vehicle applications, while oxygen tanks are often used in medical applications. In short, hydrogen tanks can be modified for oxygen storage systems [17]. “Since high-pressure oxygen has a simple delivery mechanism, the desired oxygen tank wall thickness increases with pressure, which causes a reduction in the energy density advantages” [19]. Liquid oxygen storage can be a suitable solution for limited space applications. Some drawbacks of this storage system are its complexity due to the safety concerns associated with the handling and refueling process [19]. A liquid oxygen storage system prototype has been designed by Sierra Lobo, Inc. with a diameter of 54 cm (21 inches) [17]. This prototype can store 50 kg of liquid oxygen at 452 k to run a 1-kW output PEM fuel cell. The system is 0.94-m long and 0.32 m in diameter. The weight is 13.6 kg when it is empty and 63.6 kg when it is full [20]. Table 2 shows the specific energy and the energy density for compressed and liquid oxygen storage systems, respectively [17].

Table 2: Oxygen storage system for SE and ED.

In this paper, the model for the compressed oxygen/hydrogen tank corresponds to the one used by [12, 13]. The dynamic model of oxygen/hydrogen tank was built based on (1) and (2) in the MATLAB/Simulink environment as shown in Figures 8 and 9. The compressibility factor is defined as a function of temperature and pressure. Its value equals 1 when the pressure is less than 2000 psi and is higher than 1 when the pressure is higher than 2000 psi at room temperature [13].To evaluate the fuel cell in terms of specific energy and energy density, a commercial fuel cell (Horizon 100W PEM Fuel Cell) is integrated into the storage systems. It is selected due to the effectiveness of Horizon fuel cells and its recognised experience in AUV fuel cell applications. Table 3 shows the fuel cell parameters.

Table 3: Fuel cell parameters.
Figure 8: Oxygen tank in MATLAB/Simulink [12, 13].
Figure 9: Hydrogen tank in MATLAB/Simulink [12, 13].

The calculation of the ED and SE of the complete storage system is represented as follows [16]:Those equations were applied for reactant storage combinations of liquid hydrogen/liquid oxygen and compressed hydrogen/compressed oxygen.

A polymer electrolyte membrane is an important component of a PEM fuel cell that is connected between the electrodes (anode and cathode). The cathode must be supplied by oxygen gas, whereas the anode must be supplied with hydrogen. The overall electrochemical dynamic can be represented by the following equations [14]:For any fuel cell, both the anode and cathode can be represented by the mole conservation equations as follows [14]:The fuel cell dynamic is built in a model in Simulink using a controlled voltage source in series with a constant resistance as illustrated in Figure 10 [21].

Figure 10: Fuel cell stack model [14].

Equation (10) describes the controlled voltage source (E), so thatEquation (10) shows the fuel cell stack voltage as function of activation losses because of the slowness of chemical reactions at the electrode surfaces [21]. A parallel RC branch is used to model the losses electrically. Thus, for the rapid changes in the fuel cell current, the stack voltage will demonstrate a delay response that can be 3 times to the time constant prior to equilibrium. Equation (10) also illustrates a phenomenon which delays the activation losses with a first-order transfer function , where is the stack settling time. Equation (11) represents the total fuel cell voltage by taking the losses into account due to electrodes and electrolyte resistances (ohmic losses). This model is a simplified model that can simulate a fuel cell stack at a nominal condition of pressure and temperature operations. To eliminate the flow of negative current into the fuel cell, a diode is used [21]. Polarization curves (V-I and P-I) from the simulation and data sheet are presented in Figures 11 and 12, respectively. The results from both MALAB/Simulink and the manufacturer’s data sheet align well. The performance characteristics data of the stack are given for baseline operating conditions and defined at sea level and room ambient temperature. More information about the fuel cell is attached in the Appendix.

Figure 11: Polarization curves, voltage versus current and power versus current from simulation results.
Figure 12: Polarization curves, voltage versus current and power versus current from data sheet results.
3.2. Lithium-Ion Battery and Converter

MATLAB/Simulink already has a built-in dynamic model for a Li-ion battery that depends on a modified Shepherd curve-fitting model. The voltage polarization term was added to the battery discharge voltage expression to ensure the representation of the battery SOC effect on the battery performance. For the simulation stability, the filtered battery current is implemented instead of the actual battery current for the polarization resistance. The model uses two equations for discharging and charging as follows [15]:

Discharge Model When Is Greater Than Zero

Charge Model When Is Less Than ZeroFigure 13 illustrates the dynamic model for a Li-ion battery in MATLAB/Simulink. Table 4 also shows the battery model input parameters.

Table 4: Battery model input parameters.
Figure 13: Dynamic model for Li-ion battery [15].

The simulation discharge curves for the Li-ion battery system (i.e., 48 V and 34 Ah) are shown in Figure 14.

Figure 14: Simulation discharge curves for the Li-ion battery.

The average mode boost converter is used in this simulation, and its parameters are illustrated in Table 5. For the DC/DC converter parameters, some equations have been implemented to calculate the values for duty cycle (D), inductance (L), and capacitance (C) [22]:where D is the duty cycle, which equals the fraction of time where the switch is connected in position 1, and hence 0 ≤ D ≤ 1. is the minimum input voltage, and n is the efficiency set to 90%. The variable is the switching frequency, is the output voltage, is the input current, and dv is the output voltage ripple [23].

Table 5: Boost converter parameters.
3.3. Permanent Magnetic DC Motor (PMDC)

The dynamic model for any PMDC motor can be represented by the following equations [24]: Table 6 shows the parameters for the DC motor implemented in MATLAB/Simulink. Most of these values were collected from the DC motor datasheet. Figure 15 shows the system dynamic flow rate regulators and flow rate selector. The blue and green blocks represent the hydrogen and oxygen tanks, respectively. They both enter the fuel cell stack in order to get power. The fuel cell is connected to the boost converter to increase the voltage from 24 V to 48 V, which is required by the battery and the load (i.e., DC motor). The yellow block illustrates the MUN Explorer’s motor.

Table 6: PMDC motor parameters.
Figure 15: Dynamic model in MATLAB/Simulink Software.

4. Results and Discussion

The simulation in HOMER software was done to get the sizing results for the integrated power system. The system component inputs were specified based on the cost and sizes to consider for each block. From Figure 2, the components of the PV wind turbine and electrolyzer can not be applied to the MUN Explorer due to the lack of space available, and they will be used to generate the required oxygen and hydrogen gases to run the fuel cell. From Figure 4, the assumptions of the wind and PV energy are determined based on the wind speed directions and solar radiations of St. John’s, Newfoundland, which is where this technology will be integrated. The oxygen/hydrogen tanks and fuel cell along with the batteries are planned to be installed in the MUN Explorer. The gray line also shows the most optimal results. From my point of view, the results have shown the lowest operating cost and reduce the number of batteries from 11 to 8. The advantage of minimizing the number of batteries is that it leaves more space for installing the fuel cell and the tanks. The hydrogen stored in the cylinders can be generated from renewable energy sources as a step prior to running the MUN Explorer. Figures 16 and 17 show the pressure inside the oxygen and hydrogen tanks, respectively.

Figure 16: The pressure of compressed oxygen tank.
Figure 17: The pressure of compressed hydrogen tank.

A 6-kg hydrogen tank needs to be installed inside the explorer to run the fuel cell. In terms of the oxygen tank, it can be installed as the hydrogen tank specifications which was suggested in the literature. The oxygen tank size is considered the same as the one in [20]. The fuel cell has 1 kW of power to feed the DC motor and to charge the battery once it gets enough power. Firstly, the fuel cell is connected to the boost converter, which takes 24 V to 48 V, which is required by the battery and DC motor, as shown in Figure 18. The assumptions of the fuel cell model are as follows: all gases are ideal, pressure drops across flow channels are negligible, and cell voltage drops are due to reaction kinetics and charge transport [14]. A PI controller is used to control the output voltage from the boost converter to maintain the 48 V for the battery and DC motor. The PI coefficients are shown in Table 7.

Table 7: PI coefficients for boost converter.
Figure 18: The voltage and current of fuel cell and Boost converter.

From Figure 18, we can clearly see that after 20 seconds, the fuel cell started to run to power the DC motor. This starting time is recommended by the fuel cell manufacturer and controlled by the fuel cell regulator. The battery is set to 50% state of charge (SOC) to prevent any damage to the battery and does not allow it to charge to 100%. The nominal discharge current is 14.78 A. Figure 19 shows the fuel cell power profile in HOMER through the year.

Figure 19: The fuel cell power profile.

There are 11 batteries connected in series to power the AUV for 10 hours. Figure 20 illustrates the battery behavior in terms of SOC, current, and voltage from the Simulink model, whereas Figure 21 shows the state of charge profile from HOMER sizing during the year. Figure 22 illustrates the PMDC motor, which runs at a constant speed. This constant speed is maintained by the boost converter to run the AUV at a constant speed. After that, the DC motor runs at its highest efficiency. The armature current is 16, which is very close to the manufacturer data sheet value. Figure 23 demonstrates the DC motor power profile in HOMER software.

Figure 20: The battery characteristic SOC, current, and voltage.
Figure 21: The battery power profile.
Figure 22: PMDC motor characteristics.
Figure 23: The DC motor power profile.

The monthly average electric power production from the system (i.e., PV, wind, and fuel cell) is shown in Figure 24. The solar and wind energy are used to produce oxygen and hydrogen gas by powering an electrolyzer as well as recharging the batteries. The fuel cell power production is low compared to the PV and wind power due to the integration of the fuel cell into the battery system, which has a large amount of energy to power the DC motor. Table 8 shows the results for energy density and specific energy for the storage and total system with the fuel cell. The calculations are based on the total system’s mass and weight, which can be illustrated as summations of the storage and fuel cell systems. The estimated results are shown due to the main balance of plant components that were integrated into commercial fuel cells.

Table 8: SE and ED for storage and total fuel cell.
Figure 24: Monthly average electric production.

Table 8 shows a significant improvement in terms of specific energy and energy density, especially for liquid oxygen and hydrogen storage options. In [16], Li-ion batteries have specific energies from 0.165 kWh/kg to 0.207 kWh/kg and energy densities from 0.329 kWh/L to 0.490 kWh/L [16]. The largest improvements are in the specific energy of the fuel cell total systems when compared with the lithium-ion batteries. To show the buoyancy effect on the system, the density can be defined as energy density divided by specific energy [17]:Figure 25 shows the relationship between ED and SE; the plotting of ED as functions of SE on the X and Y axes is the slope (i.e., X and Y intercept at any point) which is equivalent density at any point. The seawater density (1.03 kg/L) is shown by the dotted line. However, if there is any point above the line, it indicates negative buoyancy or being denser than seawater. Any point below the line indicates positive buoyancy or being less dense than seawater. For any given fuel cell power system design that does not require buoyancy as shown in Figure 25, some ballast or float material must be added to meet the buoyancy requirement [17].

Figure 25: Buoyancy in terms of SE and ED [17].

The power system’s capacity is increased by integrating the fuel cell power system into the MUN Explorer according to the following calculations.The energy capacity is increased by integrating the fuel cell into the system and the number of batteries is reduced by applying (20) and (21). More details are attached in the Appendix.

5. Conclusions

The sizing and modeling of the MUN Explorer’s power system were studied and simulated in this paper. The oxygen and hydrogen tanks were successfully studied in terms of specific energy and energy density. They were also implemented in MATLAB/Simulink as compressed gas storage. The results showed that a fuel cell with hydrogen and oxygen storage options has a higher energy density than batteries alone. The system sizing by HOMER was studied and implemented. The power profiles from HOMER software were illustrated for the fuel cell and DC motor. A 1-kW fuel cell and 8 Li-ion batteries can increase the power system capacity to 68 kWh. Installing these options will greatly increase the hours of operation and will help the buoyancy force. The system components are simulated in MATLAB/Simulink.

Future work that builds on this paper should improve the dynamic model in MATLAB/Simulink by including some controllers in the system. The existing power system for the MUN Explorer should be built and compared with this system (i.e., fuel cell with batteries).

Appendix

ComponentsCost
Fuel cell (500/1k) W
Electrolyzer
Hydrogen Tank
Battery
Wind turbine
PV panel
DC Motor

Specifications

https://www.mun.ca/engineering/research/facilities/centres/oerc/facilities/merlin/explorerauv.php

Technical Data

https://www.fuelcellstore.com/fuel-cell-stacks/high-power-fuel-cell-stacks/horizon-1000watt-fuel-cell-h-1000

https://www.fuelcellstore.com/hydrogen-equipment/electrolyzer-230-e107

https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/cheapest-1000W-wind-alternator-48v-for_60158460072.html

https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/48v-brushless-dc-motor-nema34220w_60500232517.html?spm=a2700.7724838.2017115.96.57493907yRTCES

https://www.fuelcellstore.com/bl-30-metal-hydride

https://www.fuelcellstore.com/hydrogen-equipment/hydrogen-storage/bl-20-metal-hydride

https://www.fuelcellstore.com/bl-60-metal-hydride

For the selection of the three hydrogen tanks, the cost of each one has entered HOMER Software inputs based on their sizes (kg) as listed in the table below.

And the capacity and pressure are listed below:

For 0.307 KgHydrogen capacity of 20-21 standard liters (0.76-0.80 scf)Hydrogen pressure when charging or discharging is 1-12 bar at room temperature

For 0.400 KgHydrogen capacity of 30-34 standard liters (1.14-1.3 scf)Hydrogen pressure when charging or discharging is 1-12 bar at room temperature

For 0.636 KgHydrogen capacity of 60-69 standard liters (2.28-2.64 scf)Hydrogen pressure when charging or discharging is 1-12 bar at room temperature

Nomenclature

AUV:Autonomous underwater vehicle
DC:Direct current
Pb:Pressure of the tank (Pa)
:Initial pressure of the tank (Pa)
:Operating temperature (K)
:Normal hydrogen flow rate (Liter/min)
:Volume of the tank (m3)
T:Temperature (K)
Z:Compressibility factor
:Molar volume (m3)
P:Pressure (pa)
ED:Energy density (kWh/L)
SE:Specific energy (kWh/kg)
SS:Storage system
:Water
:Hydrogen gas
:Oxygen gas
:Hydrogen pressure Anode side (Pa)
R:Universal gas constant (J/ (mol.K)
:Anode’s volume (m3)
:Hydrogen input flow rate (kg/sec)
:Hydrogen output flow rate (kg/sec)
:Oxygen pressure cathode side (Pa)
:Cathode’s volume (m3)
:Oxygen input flow rate (kg/sec)
:Oxygen output flow rate (kg/sec)
E:Controlled voltage source (V)
:Open circuit voltage (V)
N:Number of cells
A:Tafel slope (V)
:Exchange current (A)
:Response time (sec)
:Internal resistance (ohm)
:Fuel cell current (A)
:Fuel cell voltage (V)
:Constant time
:Nonlinear voltage (V)
:Constant voltage (V)
:Exponential zone dynamics (V)
K:Polarization constant (Ah−1)
:Low frequency current dynamics (A)
i:Battery current (A)
it:Extracted capacity (Ah)
Q:Maximum battery capacity (Ah)
A:Exponential voltage (V)
B:Exponential capacity (Ah−1)
Ah:Ampere hour
COE:Levelized cost of energy ($/kWh)
NPC:Total net present cost of a system
D:Duty cycle
:Minimum input voltage (V)
n:Efficiency
:Switching frequency (V)
:Output voltage (V)
:Input current (A)
dv:Output voltage ripple (V)
L:Inductance (H)
C:Capacitance (F)
:DC source voltage (V)
:Armature current (A)
:Armature resistance (Ω)
:Armature inductance (H)
J:Inertia constant (kgm2)
:Constant (N ms)
:Torque constant (V·s/rad)
:Motor speed (rpm)
D:Density (kg/L)
V:Volume (m3)
M:Mass (kg).

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest in regard to this publication.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Libyan Government for financial support for this work.

References

  1. Q. Cai, D. J. Browning, D. J. Brett, and N. P. Brandon, “Hybrid fuel cell/battery power systems for underwater vehicles,” in Proceedings of the 3rd SEADS STC Technical Conference, Edinburgh, 2007.
  2. B. Lee, K. Park, and H.-M. Kim, “Dynamic simulation of PEM water electrolysis and comparison with experiments,” International Journal of Electrochemical Science, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 235–248, 2013. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. John Speranza, Proton OnSite, and C. T. Wallingford, “The effects of hydrogen purity on GC analysis and column life,” Electrolysis, 2015. View at Google Scholar
  4. A. Uluoglu, Solar- hydrogen stand- alone power system design and simulations [Ph.D. Thesis], Mechanical Engineering, 2010.
  5. K. Sopian, M. Z. Ibrahim, W. R. Wan Daud, M. Y. Othman, B. Yatim, and N. Amin, “Performance of a PV–wind hybrid system for hydrogen production,” Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 34, no. 8, pp. 1973–1978, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. S. N. Motapon, A. Lupien-Bedard, L. Dessaint, H. Fortin-Blanchette, and K. Al-Haddad, “A generic electrothermal Li-ion battery model for rapid evaluation of cell temperature temporal evolution,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 998–1008, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. V. K. Kumaraswamy and J. E. Quaicoe, “Tracking techniques for the PEMFC in portable applications,” in Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference, EPEC 2016, Canada, October 2016. View at Scopus
  8. S. Curtin and J. Gangi, “Fuel cell technologies market report 2014,” U.S. Department of Energy EERE, pp. 1–58, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. T-Raissi, “Current technology of fuel cell systems,” in Proceedings of the 32nd Intersociet In Energy Conversion Engineering Conference, (IECEC-97), vol. 3, pp. 1953–1957, 1997.
  10. Ø. Hasvold, N. J. Størkersen, S. Forseth, and T. Lian, “Power sources for autonomous underwater vehicles,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 935–942, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. E. Raugel, V. Rigaud, and C. Lakeman, “Sea experiment of a survey AUV powered by a fuel cell system,” in Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, AUV 2010, USA, September 2010. View at Scopus
  12. M. Uzunoglu, O. C. Onar, and M. S. Alam, “Modeling, control and simulation of a PV/FC/UC based hybrid power generation system for stand-alone applications,” Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 509–520, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. Gorgun, “Dynamic modelling of a proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolyzer,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 29–38, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. R. Gerasimos, S. Pierluigi, W. Patrice, and L. Vincenzo, “A PEM fuel cells control approach based on differential flatness theory,” Intelligent Industrial Systems 2, vol. no. 2, pp. 107–117, 2016. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Njoya Motapon, L. Dessaint, and K. Al-Haddad, “A comparative study of energy management schemes for a fuel-cell hybrid emergency power system of more-electric aircraft,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 1320–1334, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Alejandro, T. Leo, and M. Herreros, “Fuel cell power systems for autonomous underwater Vehicles: state of the art,” in Proceedings of the 1st International of ECE, 2014.
  17. L. Davies Kevin and M. Robert, UUV FCEPS Technology Assessment and Design Process, University of Hawaii, 2006.
  18. A. Chakravarty, T. K. Nizami, and C. Mahanta, “Real time implementation of an adaptive backstepping control of buck converter PMDC-motor combinations,” in Proceedings of the 3rd Indian Control Conference, ICC 2017, pp. 277–282, India, January 2017. View at Scopus
  19. K. E. Swider-Lyons, R. T. Carlin, R. L. Rosenfeld, and R. J. Nowak, “Technical issues and opportunities for fuel cell development for autonomous underwater vehicles,” in Proceedings of the 2002 Workshop on Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, pp. 61–64, USA, June 2002. View at Scopus
  20. G. Griffiths, D. Reece, P. Blackmore, M. Lain, S. Mitchell, and J. Jamieson, “Modeling Hybrid Energy Systems for Use in AUVs,” Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  21. N. M. Souleman, O. Tremblay, and L.-A. Dessaint, “A generic fuel cell model for the simulation of fuel cell vehicles,” in Proceedings of the 5th IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, VPPC '09, pp. 1722–1729, USA, September 2009. View at Scopus
  22. H. J. Sira-Ramirez and R. Silva-Ortigoza, Control Design Techniques in Power Electronics Devices, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany, 2006.
  23. R. W. Erickson, “DC–DC Power Converters,” Wiley Encyclopedia of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  24. M. M. Shebani and T. Iqbal, “Dynamic modeling, control, and analysis of a solar water pumping system for Libya,” Journal of Renewable Energy, vol. 2017, Article ID 8504283, 13 pages, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar