Journal of Environmental and Public Health

Journal of Environmental and Public Health / 2012 / Article
Special Issue

Environmental Pollution: Health Effects and Operational Implications for Pollutants Removal

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 352309 |

Fathi Alhashmi Bashir, Mohammad Shuhaimi-Othman, A. G. Mazlan, "Evaluation of Trace Metal Levels in Tissues of Two Commercial Fish Species in Kapar and Mersing Coastal Waters, Peninsular Malaysia", Journal of Environmental and Public Health, vol. 2012, Article ID 352309, 10 pages, 2012.

Evaluation of Trace Metal Levels in Tissues of Two Commercial Fish Species in Kapar and Mersing Coastal Waters, Peninsular Malaysia

Academic Editor: Mohammad Mehdi Amin
Received16 Jun 2011
Revised20 Jul 2011
Accepted15 Aug 2011
Published23 Oct 2011


This study is focused on evaluating the trace metal levels in water and tissues of two commercial fish species Arius thalassinus and Pennahia anea that were collected from Kapar and Mersing coastal waters. The concentrations of Fe, Zn, Al, As, Cd and Pb in these coastal waters and muscle, liver and gills tissues of the fishes were quantified. The relationship among the metal concentrations and the height and weight of the two species were also examined. Generally, the iron has the highest concentrations in both water and the fish species. However, Cd in both coastal waters showed high levels exceeding the international standards. The metal level concentration in the sample fishes are in the descending order livers > gills > muscles. A positive association between the trace metal concentrations and weight and length of the sample fishes was investigated. Fortunately the level of these metal concentrations in fish has not exceeded the permitted level of Malaysian and international standards.

1. Introduction

It is unfortunate that we, human beings without realizing the consequences of pollution, do a lot of activities that terribly ruin the nature, resulting in the denial of healthy environment to our successors. Water contamination is one of the serious concerns that affect the marine ecosystem with high concentration of trace level metals. Malaysia is one of the countries that critically face this issue since 1990. The reason for this alarming situation is due to the rapid economic growth that the country is experiencing for the past two decades. The contamination of water cannot be taken as price for this economic boom.

According to Paquin et al. [1] the coastal or river waters are contaminated by the dumping of industrial wastages. The metals accumulated in these waters infect the humans by direct consumption of water or through consuming the affected organisms like fishes [2, 3] claim that when the level of trace metal concentrations exceeds the stipulated level, it turns out to be toxic. Very recently, the work in [4] has stated that the higher level of metal concentration will bring shattering effect to the ecological balance by altering the range of organisms in water.

Several researchers, including [58], have studied the importance of fishes and their healthy benefits. They claim that fishes are the most healthy food with the high source of omega 3 fatty acids, that brings a lot of benefits to us, including the reduction of heart-related diseases. Apart from this, the fishes are rich source of vitamins, minerals, and proteins. Studies in [9, 10] reveal that 60 to 70% of protein needs are fulfilled by the consumption of fishes in Malaysia. But, [1113] have analysed the other side of high fish consumptions. They claim that other than cardiovascular benefits, the exceeding level of fish diet brings negative impact to the human society.

Researches in [14, 15] reveal that iron and zinc are essential for the metabolism of fishes. At the same time, aluminium, cadmium, arsenic, and lead are added to the food chain of these organisms though they do not play any important role in the metabolic activities. Whereas [16] ascertain that when we consuming fishes with high accumulation of theses metals, over a long period of time, will bring harmful effects to us. Reilly and Barton [17, 18] added that the continual high dosage of Al consumption will result in lung fibrosis, osteomalacia, defective bone mineralization, dialysis dementia, and ferric-independent microcytic anaemia. Further studies regarding diseases related to high dose of mineral consumption can be summarized as follows. High Cd Accumulation brings skeletal damage, kidney dysfunction, and reproductive deficiencies [19]; cardiovascular disease, skin disorders, cancer, and neurotoxicity are triggered by arsenic consumption [20]; Pb, termed as neurotoxins, brings cardiovascular diseases to adults and reduced mental development in children [19, 20].

According to Canli and Atli [21] Fe and Zn are very vital for the normal metabolism for the schools of fishes. At the same time iron is one of the important trace metals that highly benefits humans. It serves as the oxygen conductor between the tissues and lungs. Camara et al. [22] have established the health benefits of advocated level of mineral consumption. They claim that deficiency of Zn will cause loss of appetite, growth retardation, skin changes, and immunological abnormalities. But Tüzen [23] has stated that though Zn has biological significance, excessive consumption of these kinds of metals will affect the humans. The trace metal sewage from industries pollutes water and fishes in turn. The consumption of the affected fishes over a prolonged period will harm the health of humans.

Fortunately previous studies reveal that the trace metal concentration level in fishes is not that much alarming in South East Asian countries. The researchers have examined muscles, livers, and gills of fishes as these organs play different roles in bioaccumulation process [24]. Hamilton and Mehrle [25] say that the concentration level of metals in gills represents the level of metals in water, where they dwell. The concentrations of metals in liver represent their storage level. Metallothioneins (MTs) are the metal-binding proteins accumulated in livers, whereas [26, 27] assert that metal accumulation in the muscles of fishes is dangerous as they are the most edible part. They also established that, environmental evaluation in aquaecology shall be conducted in water, organisms, or sediments. Each of these components provides partial image of metal accumulation in the whole ecosystem.

According to Marcovecchio and Moreno [28], studying the trace level in organisms reflects the real degree of pollution in the related environment. References [2931] state that generally fishes are used as the medium for monitoring anthropogenic pollution level in the environment. As fishes are the last level of the food chain, the polluted varieties will easily pass the metals into the humans when they are consumed [3235].

The marine ecosystem of Kapar is selected as it is located in the Strait of Malacca which consists of many pollution sources situated around it. This locality gets infected by a great variety of pollutants due to the existence of large number of international shipping lanes and the concentration of agriculture, industrialization, and urbanization activities along the coast of Peninsular Malaysia [36]. Moreover, the Strait of Malacca is one of the most vulnerable areas to contamination by oil spills [37]. On the other hand, the Strait of Malacca is the most important fishing ground in Malaysia, accounting for approximately 70% of total fish landings of the country [37].

Apart from the above-mentioned sources of pollution, an electric power station that uses coal and discharges the polluted, preused water into the surface water systems surrounding Kapar, also contribute to the trace metal pollution of the marine ecosystem in this area. Moreover, Kapar has great importance for the local fishery industry therefore, it is vital to estimate the selected metals in fish of the Kapar coastal water, to define the current trace metal levels in the fish as well as to monitor the trends of change in fish trace metal levels with time.

However, evaluation of the levels of the same metals in Mersing allows for comparison between the two areas, particularly in terms of the kinds and effects of different pollution sources in the two areas. This study is focused on measuring the concentration level of selected metals (Al, Fe, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb) in the muscles, livers, and gills of selected species of fishes and the pollution level in the coastal areas in Malaysia. Moreover, the relationships between the trace metal levels in these tissues and the length and weight of fishes were also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents

The reagents with suprapur quality, analytical grade Nitric acid (65%), and hydrogen peroxide (30%) were acquired from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) along with the stock standard solutions of Al, Fe, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb in concentrations of 1,000 mg/L. Prior to the experiments the apparatus were sterilised by soaking them overnight in diluted nitric acid (10%) and were later rinsed with deionised water. The experiments were conducted using the distilled deionised water.

2.2. Apparatus

In this study we have used Perkin Elmer model Elan 9000 inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, USA), [40]. After calibrating the instrument with standard solutions derived from commercial materials, it was optimized according to the manufacturing standards. Besides these initiations, the cones and tubes were thoroughly cleaned to get rid of any possible residues. Table 1 shows the analytical conditions for determining the trace metals by the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

PerformanceOperating condition

RF Generator40 MHz
RF Power1000 W
Spray ChamberRyton Scott
Plasma gas flow15.0 L/min
Auxiliary gas flow1.0 L/min
Nebulizer gas flow0.60 L/min
Sampler & skimmer coneNickel

2.3. Study Area

Water and fish sampling were done at two different stations of coastal waters of Peninsular Malaysia in October 2009. Stations shown on the map (Figure 1) were chosen in relation to the contamination gradient.

The first station chosen was Kapar (3°11′54′′ N, 101°32′66′′ E) located in Selangor on the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia near the Sultan Salahuddin Abdul Aziz Power Plant station. In terms of pollution, the water quality of Kapar coast is influenced by various industrial outputs, discharged directly to the sea or by rivers. The second station was Mersing (2°25′60′′ N, 103°49′60′′ E) in Johor on the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia, it is relatively clean when compared with Kapar.

2.4. Samples Collection and Samples Preparation
2.4.1. Collection of Water Samples

For research purpose a stint of 200 ml of water was collected with the help of 21 cc capacity automated sampler. The sample was collected from the surface of the coastal water (depth range < 10 centimetre). The sample was then filtered using Whatman 0.45 μm membrane filter paper, and filled in polyethylene bottles (amber coloured). These bottles were pre washed with 1 (N) HNO3 and deionised water. Later 3 mL of concentrated HNO3 was added to the collected sample to avoid oxidation and preserved at 4°C, prior to analysis.

2.4.2. Collection of Fish Samples

Two commercially significant and nutritious fish species, namely, duri (Arius thalassinus) and gelama (Pennahia anea), were selected and collected with various fishing methods by fishermen (Table 2). Ten fresh fish specimens of both the species, from each station, were collected from local fishermen. The samples were stored in a cool box (−4°C) and transported to the laboratory for metal analysis. Total length (cm) and weight (g) of the fish samples were measured before dissection.

SpeciesSamples numberFamilyCommon nameHabitatTotal weight (g)Total length (cm)

A. thalassinus10AriidaeSea catfishDemersal300–50031–36
P. anea10SciaenidaeBig eye CroakerDemersal112–13021–25

The specimens were dissected with sterilized stainless steel equipment. The dissected parts such as muscle, liver, and gills were later dried in an oven at 80°C until constant weight was obtained. The homogenized samples (muscle, liver, and gills) were digested in triplicate in a microwave oven digestive system (Start D Microwave Digestive System) with HNO3 (65% Merck) and H2O2 (30% Merck) in Teflon vessels. The residues were filtered through 0.45 μm Whatman filter paper (Whatman international Ltd. Cat) and transferred to a 50 mL volumetric flask and diluted to level with deionised water in the case of muscle and gills. However, in the case of liver tissues, the final dilution volume was 25 mL rather than 50 mL [41].

Analytical blanks were run in the same way as the samples and determined using standard solutions, prepared in the same acid matrix. All chemical materials and standard solutions used in this study were obtained from Merck and were of analytical grade.

2.5. Analysis of Metals

As discussed earlier in Section 2.2, the concentrations of iron (Fe), zinc (Zn), aluminium (Al), arsenic (As), cadmium (Cd), and lead (Pb), in water and two species of fish, were examined using the inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The analytical findings were articulated in terms of micrograms of metal in every gram of fish on dry weight basis (μg/g dry weight). The performance assessment of this method was done by examining a standard reference material of marine biota sample (SRM2976, freeze-dried mussel tissue, National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA).

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Due to the lack of normal distribution of data, the log transformation was implemented for the normalization process. To examine the vital differences in the concentrations of heavy metals in the two research sites, the t-test was conducted. Moreover, to investigate the denoting dissimilarity of concentrations of trace metals among the three fish organs, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used. Pearson rank correlation analysis was employed, to measure the latent associations of metal concentrations with fish weight and length. For which a P value less than 0.05 was considered as suggestive of statistical significance. SPSS for windows, version 16.0 was used to perform all the above-mentioned tests.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Validation of Analytical Methods

The precision and accuracy of the applied analytical method was validated by accurate analysis of standard reference material of marine biota sample (SRM2976, freeze-dried mussel tissue, National Institute of Standards and Technology, USA). All the runs were carried out in triplicate. The results obtained on the SRMs are showed in Table 3 which was in a good agreement with the certified values for all metals. Recovered values of all metals were between 83% and 109% of the certified value.

ElementCertified valueMeasured valueSRD%Recovery (%)

Al134 ± 34128.230.296
Fe158 ± 8144.64192
Zn137 ± 13115.201.184
As13.3 ± 1.814.4522.5109
Cd0.82 ± 0.160.67912.583
Pb1.19 ± 0.181.0260.486

(1)Certified mussel standard reference material (SRM) 2976.
3.1.1. Quality Control

It is vital for the analytical instruments (ICP-MS) to meet the standard before it can produce a reliable data. Calibration curve of each element must be able to produce good correlation coefficient 𝑟 2 = 0 . 9 9 9 .

3.1.2. Instrument Detection Limit (IDL)

The IDL is the smallest signal that can be differentiated from background noise by a specific device. The method detection limit should be always higher than the IDL, whereas the IDL is thrice equal to the standard deviation of 10 replicates measurements of calibration blanks signal at the selected elements.

3.1.3. Limit of Detection (LOD)

The LOD is the least amount of a substance that can be distinguished from the absence of it (a blank value) within a stated confidence limit (generally 1%). The method detection limit is defined as the concentration corresponding thrice to the standard deviation of ten reagent blanks [42]. Table 4 shows the method detection limit (μg/g) of five metals and the FDA recommended health-criteria concentrations (μg/g) of five metals in seafood [38, 39]. The detection limit values were found to be 0.287 μg/g for Al, 0.492 μg/g for Fe, 0.474 μg/g for Zn, 0.403 μg/g for As, 0.193 μg/g for Cd, and 0.606 μg/g for Pb which were much lower than the recommended health-criteria values.

Trace metalsDetection limit (μg/g) *Health-criteria levels


*FDA recommended health criteria concentrations (μg/g), [38, 39].
3.1.4. Limit of Quantitation (LOQ)

The LOQ is mathematically expressed as equal to 10 times the standard deviation of the results for a sequence of replicates used to establish a reasonable boundary of detection. The LOQ values were found to be 2.87 for Al, 4.92 μg/g for Fe, 4.73 μg/g for Zn, 4.03 μg/g for As, 1.95 μg/g for Cd, and 6.16 μg/g for Pb.

3.2. Trace Metals Contents in Water

Analysis on water quality of baseline study for Kapar and Mersing seawater are necessary to predict the level of pollutant as well as to the environment in the study areas. Table 5 shows the water temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), and the trace metal levels in the seawater samples from Kapar and Mersing. The water temperature from Mersing and Kapar ranges from 19.6 to 22.5°C; the variation in water temperature was mainly due to prevailing weather conditions. The statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference between the two locations ( 𝑃 > 0 . 0 5 ). Moreover, the pH has ranged between 7.23–7.56. The standard pH for seawater is 6.5–8.5 [43], and the values obtained were within the recommended standard, and there was no significant difference in pH for the two sampling sites. The lowest dissolved oxygen (DO) value recorded was 4.37 mg/L at Kapar, while the highest was 7.90 mg/L at Mersing. Generally, the dissolved oxygen will be affected by water temperature, tides, and depths. Furthermore, the maximum concentration of the metals in the water samples in the descending order were Fe > Al > As > Zn > Pb > Cd and Fe > As > Cd > Zn > Al > Pb from Kapar and Mersing, respectively. Al, Zn, and As had higher concentration in Kapar, whereas the Fe and Cd had higher in Mersing. There was no significant difference in metal concentrations in the two sampling locations. Additionally, the comparison of trace metals level with NWQSM and WHO [44, 45] showed that all the metal concentrations were below the maximum acceptable concentration (MAC), except for Cd from both sites that showed high levels exceeding the international standards suggesting that adverse effects to aquatic organisms would frequently occur.

AlFeZnAsPbCdT (C°)pHDO (mg/L)




NWQSM* National Water Quality Standards for Malaysia. WHO**World Health Organization.
3.3. Trace Metals Contents in Various Organs in Fish

Knowledge about heavy metals concentration in fish is important with respect to nature management and human consumption. Levels of six metals (μg/g dry wt.) in muscle, liver, and gill tissues of two fish species collected from the coastal waters around Kapar and Mersing are shown in Tables 6 and 7. Generally, the highest concentrations of iron, zinc, aluminium, arsenic, and lead were found in the liver tissues of both examined fish species. The analysis of variance proved that the mean concentrations of metals in the organs of each species were significantly different ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ) in both the species except for Cd. The concentrations of the studied metals decreased in the following order Fe > Zn > Al > As > Pb > Cd in the two species. Iron exhibited the highest concentrations in all the examined organs of both species, followed by Zn. On the other hand, the levels of Pb and Cd were generally the lowest. Similar findings were reported by many researchers [14, 4648].


A. thalassinusMuscle 7 . 2 4 ± 0 . 0 5 3 . 8 4 ± 5 . 1 5 0 . 9 9 ± 5 . 3 4 1 2 . 5 8 ± 0 . 8 0 . 0 8 8 ± 0 . 0 1 0 . 1 2 ± 0 . 0 1
Liver 2 8 . 3 8 ± 1 . 9 2 1 0 0 7 . 1 ± 1 1 . 7 5 5 0 . 8 9 ± 6 . 7 5 1 4 . 1 7 ± 1 . 0 3 1 . 0 1 ± 0 . 0 7 1 . 5 4 ± 0 . 1 9
Gills 5 3 8 . 6 ± 3 . 4 8 8 0 5 . 6 ± 3 . 3 8 8 4 0 . 8 9 ± 5 . 2 1 3 . 5 9 ± 0 . 6 9 0 . 0 4 8 ± 0 . 0 1 2 . 0 3 ± 0 . 0 5

P. aneaMuscle 3 . 0 0 ± 0 . 1 1 2 1 . 6 2 ± 4 . 7 2 6 . 3 2 ± 1 . 6 3 . 2 8 ± 0 . 6 5 0 . 0 4 8 ± 0 . 0 1 0 . 1 3 ± 0 . 0 0 4
Liver 1 3 . 7 2 ± 1 . 1 2 1 9 7 5 . 0 ± 3 8 . 9 1 1 4 . 1 1 ± 2 . 1 6 1 1 . 7 5 ± 0 . 1 3 0 . 6 9 4 ± 0 . 0 5 0 . 5 7 ± 0 . 0 3
Gills 2 9 9 . 5 ± 0 . 7 5 8 9 1 . 6 ± 2 8 . 6 6 0 . 2 1 ± 0 . 4 4 4 . 7 5 ± 0 . 6 5 0 . 6 9 0 ± 0 . 0 5 0 . 2 6 ± 0 . 0 2


*WHO (1989), **FAO (1992), aFAO 1983, ***Malaysian Food regulation (1985).


A. thalassinusMuscle 5 . 4 4 ± 1 . 2 5 3 4 . 9 1 ± 1 . 7 4 2 5 . 3 9 ± 0 . 7 1 1 4 . 2 ± 2 . 3 4 0 . 0 2 ± 0 . 0 3 0 . 2 ± 0 . 0 2
Liver 1 0 . 0 5 ± 1 . 7 9 2 4 . 6 ± 2 4 . 7 3 4 1 . 9 ± 3 . 3 5 2 1 . 8 9 ± 0 . 9 2 . 0 7 5 ± 0 . 1 0 . 8 7 ± 0 . 0 7
Gills 8 5 0 . 1 ± 7 . 1 8 2 2 . 7 6 ± 9 . 9 2 4 6 . 5 5 ± 7 . 4 7 . 6 5 ± 0 . 1 0 . 0 2 ± 0 . 0 1 0 . 2 4 ± 0 . 0 2

P. aneaMuscle 1 . 4 6 ± 1 3 2 1 . 4 7 ± 1 . 8 6 1 8 . 1 ± 0 . 7 9 3 . 7 6 ± 0 . 2 0 . 0 2 3 ± 0 . 0 2 0 . 1 7 ± 0 . 0 5
Liver 5 . 1 3 ± 0 . 6 5 5 2 5 . 9 6 ± 1 7 1 0 4 . 8 4 ± 1 . 2 3 8 . 3 8 ± 0 . 2 2 2 . 4 6 ± 0 . 0 2 1 . 0 7 ± 0 . 0 7
Gills 9 1 . 0 3 ± 2 . 7 4 6 1 . 4 ± 8 . 6 6 6 . 2 4 ± 1 . 3 4 . 8 8 ± 0 . 1 3 0 . 0 5 ± 0 . 0 1 1 . 9 6 ± 0 . 1 6


*WHO (1989), **FAO (1992), aFAO 1983, ***Malaysian Food regulation (1985).

It is observed that Fe concentration was the highest in both species and both study areas. In the present study, with the exception of Al, liver had significantly higher trace element concentrations than gills and muscle. It is observed that the mean concentrations of metals in the muscle, liver, and gills of each fish species showed great variations, this may be related to the differences in ecological needs, swimming behaviours, and the metabolic activities among different fish species.

The differences in metal concentrations of the tissues might be due to their capacity to induce metal-binding proteins such as metallothioneins. Our study showed that the metal levels in liver and gills were highest in the sampled species. It is well known that large amount of metallothioneins induction occurs in the liver tissue of fishes. The adsorption of metals onto gill surface could also be an important influence in total metal levels of the gill [30].

The mean concentrations of Fe in the muscles of P. Anea and A. thalassinus in Kapar were 34.91 μg/g and 53.84 μg/g, respectively. However, in Mersing the mean concentrations were 21.47 μg/g in P. Anea and 21.62 μg/g in A. thalassinus. It is revealed that Fe concentrations varied significantly ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ) between the two stations. Higher Fe concentration in muscles of both species was found in the fish from Kapar than that of Mersing. The reason for this is that the Kapar area is polluted by various sources such as electrical power station, international shipping activities, and urban and agricultural activities. Similarly, the concentrations of Fe in the liver tissues of P. anea and A. thalassinus in Kapar were, approximately, 1976.0 μg/g and 1008.0 μg/g, respectively. But in the same tissues of the fish from Mersing the concentrations were 526.0 μg/g and 924.6 μg/g, respectively. The levels of iron in the muscles of Mediterranean Sea fish that are reported in the literature ranges from 59.6 and 73.4 μg/g [31]. The concentrations of Fe in the fish muscle were reported to have the range of 24.1–50.3 μg/g in Parangipettai Coast, India [49] and the range of 49.9–889 μg/g in the Turkish seas [47]. Therefore, the levels of iron in the fish muscles reported in this study are generally in accordance with the literature.

According to the results (Tables 6 and 7), concentrations of Zn in the livers of P. anea and A. thalassinus collected from Kapar and Mersing were 114.1 μg/g and 555.9 μg/g (Table 6), and 104.8 μg/g and 341.9 μg/g (Table 7), respectively. Generally, high concentrations of Zn were observed in the livers of A. thalassinus in both the studied areas. The mean concentrations of Zn in the muscle tissues of P. Anea and A. thalassinus collected from Kapar were around 26.3 μg/g and 51.0 μg/g, respectively. However, in Mersing the respective concentrations were 18.1 μg/g and 25.4 μg/g. Higher Zn concentrations in the muscle tissues of both species were found in Kapar than in Mersing.

The observed differences can be explained by the fact that the concentrations of these metals depend to a great extent on species, sex, biological cycle, and on the part of the fish analyzed [23]. Moreover, ecological factors such as season, location/environment of development, nutrient availability, and temperature and salinity of the water, may contribute to variations in the metal concentrations in fishes. Ranges of Zn concentrations reported earlier in the muscles and livers of Malaysian marine fish were 15.4–60.1 μg/g and 27.1–95.3 μg/g, respectively [40]. Another study conducted in Langkawi Island showed that all species had higher concentrations of Zn than of other metals and that the concentrations in muscles ranged from 34.3 μg/g to 49.4 μg/g [50]. Accordingly, the Zn concentrations in the fish muscles detected by the present study are similar to those reported by [50].

In this study, the concentrations of aluminium were the highest in the gills and it ranged from 13.7 μg/g in P. anea to 538.6 μg/g in A. thalassinus in Kapar, and from 91.0 μg/g in P.anea to 850.14 μg/g in A. thalassinus at Mersing, whereas in A. thalassinus, the Al concentration was 7.2 μg/g in muscle and 28.4 μg/g in liver at Kapar station and it was 5.4 μg/g and 10.0 μg/g in the fish muscle and liver tissues, respectively, at Mersing station.

On the other hand, the concentrations of Al in the muscle and liver tissues of P. anea was 3.0 μg/g and 13.7 μg/g, respectively, in Kapar while the respective concentrations in Mersing were 1.5 μg/g and 5.1 μg/g, respectively. The mean Al concentrations were higher in the three organs fish species captured from Kapar than its concentration in the same organs of the fish species collected from Mersing except gills of A. thalassinus from Mersing. The Al concentrations were reported to fall within the range 1.50–4.50 μg/g in fish muscles from the Parangipettai Coast, India [49]. On the other hand, the Al concentrations were reported earlier to fall in the range of 51.9–166.3 μg/g in muscles and in the range of 229.01–1412.7 μg/g in gills of Malaysian marine fish from Kapar [51]. As such, the Al concentrations observed in this study generally correspond with the values reported in the literature.

Arsenic levels in the muscles of the analyzed fish ranged from 3.8 μg/g in P. anea in Kapar to 14.2 μg/g in A. thalassinus in Mersing. Whereas, the arsenic levels in fish livers ranged from 11.8 μg/g in P. anea from Kapar to 21.9 μg/g in A. thalassinus from Mersing. The arsenic levels in the fish gills ranged from 4.9 μg/g in P. anea from Mersing to 13.6 μg/g in A. thalassinus from Kapar (Tables 6 and 7). Unfortunately we do not have sufficient data of arsenic levels in fish tissues from Malaysia, to be compared with our findings.

According to published literature, ranges of arsenic concentrations reported earlier in the muscles of Malaysian marine fish were 1.05–2.14 μg/g [52]. Another study conducted showed that arsenic content of fish from Indian coastal waters was within the range of 0.01–0.63 μg/g [53] which are well below the arsenic levels detected in fish tissues by this study.

In this study, the lead concentrations in muscles ranged from 0.1 μg/g in P. anea in Kapar to 0.2 μg/g in A. thalassinus in Mersing. While in the livers the concentrations ranged from 1.1 μg/g in P. anea from Mersing to 1.5 μg/g in A. thalassinus in Kapar. On the other hand, the concentration ranged in gills from 1.96 μg/g in P. anea in Mersing to 2.03 μg/g in A. thalassinus in Kapar. Lead levels reported earlier in the literature fall in the range of 0.018–0.023 μg/g for muscles and 0.115–0.380 μg/g for livers of fish from Mersing. Moreover, the lead level ranged from 0.026–0.72 μg/g in muscles and 0.041–0.872 μg/g in livers of fishes from Langkawi coastal waters of Malaysia [40]. Hence, the Pb concentrations reported herein comply with these ranges.

The results of this investigation reveal that there is no significant variation in Cd levels (P > 0.05). The highest concentrations were observed in the livers of the fish species from Mersing, where the mean Cd concentration ranged from 2.075 μg/g in livers of A. thalassinus to 2.458 μg/g in livers of P. anea from Mersing coastal water. While the highest levels of Cd in the muscles were recorded as 0.088μg/g in A. thalassinus from Kapar, in contrast, the lowest value of Cd detected was 0.021 μg/g in the muscles of P. anea from Mersing, whereas the Cd levels reported in the literature fall in the range of 0.14–0.57 mg/kg and 0.15–0.52 mg/kg for muscles of A. thalassinus and P. anea from the same study area Kapar [51]. Another study was conducted on commercial marine fish from Klang Valley, Malaysia, which concluded that the mean Cd concentrations in the fish muscles ranged from 0.121 mg/kg to 1.594 mg/kg [54]. The third study investigated the marine fin fish captured from the coast of Langkawi Island in Malaysia and reported that the mean Cd concentrations in the fish muscles ranged from 0.30 μg/g to 0.90 μg/g [50]. Compared with the literature from different Malaysian marine coastal waters, our results for Cd concentration is lower than the literature. Cd and Pb have higher tendencies to bioaccumulate in the fish liver tissues which involves in the detoxification process. The presence of free protein-thiol group content and metallothioneins binding proteins in the liver forms a strong fixation with the heavy metals [55]. Meanwhile fish liver acts as major site for homeostasis [56].

The variability in heavy metal levels in different species depends on feeding habits [26], ecological needs, and metabolism [30], age, size, and length of the fish [57], and fish habitat [21]. Concentrations of trace metals detected in the muscle, gill, and liver samples indicate different bioaccumulation potentials. Muscles seem to be a transitory tissue in the pathway of metal uptake and in metal storage, whereas the liver appears to be the tissue, specialized in metal storage and detoxification [58]. The gills comprise the chief exposure tissue and early uptake site of the soluble, waterborne metals in which metal concentrations are the highest in the early stages of exposure, before these metals are transported to other fish tissues [59]. Although human activity is concentrated in the west coast of Peninsular Malaysia, compared with the east coast, there is some contamination with heavy metals in the east coast. The results of the present study suggest that, at some point, sources of heavy metal contaminations are present in the east coast of Peninsular Malaysia in spite of the relatively low human activities.

The relationships between body size and trace element concentrations in the two fish species were also investigated and significant positive correlations between the total fish length and weight and heavy metal concentrations were found ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 5 ) (Figure 2). Particularly, the concentrations of some of the heavy metals of concern had positive, high correlations with fish weight and total length. On the other side, metal concentrations were more affected by fish weight than by length. Our findings were in agreement with results reported by [60].

4. Conclusion

This study was undertaken to provide information on trace metal concentrations in water and two fish species from Kapar and Mersing. The highest metal concentrations were found in the fish liver and gill tissues, while the muscles tend to accumulate relatively low metal levels. Generally, the Fe concentrations were the highest in water samples and all organs of the two species in both study areas except the muscles of P. anea from Kapar which had higher Zn concentration, and the gills of A. thalassinus from both Kapar and Mersing had higher Al and Zn levels, respectively. Moreover, the A. thalassinus species had higher metal concentrations than the P. anea. In water samples, Cd concentrations in both sites exceed the international standards, but still in the permissible levels of national standards. The mean concentrations of heavy metals, analyzed in the muscles of both species, were lower than the maximum concentrations recommended by [6163]. The concentrations of Al, Fe, Zn, As, Cd, and Pb in muscle tissues should pose no acute toxicological risks to human health. This study revealed that the studied metals concentrations are generally low in the tissues of the examined fish in the two study areas. Although the levels of these heavy metals are not high, a potential danger may emerge in the future depending on pollution sources. The data may be taken as a convenient base line against which any future pollution trends can be evaluated.


μg/g:Micrograms per gram
μg/L:Micrograms per liter
Mg/L:Milligrams per liter
SD:Standard deviation
RSD:Relative standard deviation.


The authors are grateful to the Libyan Ministry of High Education for the generous financial support they have kindly provided for this study. The authors would also like to thank the staff of the microwave and ICP-MS laboratory, Faculty of Science and Technology, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, for their help in running the analyses and for their extended assistance.


  1. R. R. Paquin, K. Farley, R. C. Santore et al., Metals in Aquatic Systems: A Review of Exposure, Bioaccumulation, and Toxicity Models, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola, Fla, USA, 2003.
  2. G. W. Goldstein, “Lead poisoning and brain cell function,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 89, pp. 91–94, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  3. A. Malik, “Metal bioremediation through growing cells,” Environment International, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 261–278, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. Y. Kamaruzzaman, Z. Rina, B. A. A. John, and K. C. A. Jalal, “Heavy metal accumulation in commercially important fishes of South West Malaysian coast,” Reaesrch Journal of Environmental Sciences, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 595–602, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  5. V. Wim, S. Issabelle, D. Karen, H. Stefan, and C. John, “Consumer perception versus scientific evidence of farmed and wild fish: exploratory insights from Belgium,” Aquaculture International, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 121–136, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. M. I. Castro-Gonzalez and M. Mendez-Armenta, “Heavy metals: implications associated to fish consumption,” Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 263–271, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. P. Hajeb, S. Jinap, A. Ismail, A. B. Fatimah, B. Jamilah, and M. Abdul Rahim, “Assessment of mercury level in commonly consumed marine fishes in Malaysia,” Food Control, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 79–84, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. Food and Agriculture Organization, “Nutritional elements of fish,” 2010, on 26/8/2010. View at: Google Scholar
  9. L. Tukiman, I. Norazura, M. Ahmad, and A. R. Sahibin, “Kandungan logam berat dalam makanan laut dan kadar pengambilannya oleh penduduk di Tanjung Karang, Selangor,” The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 197–204, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  10. A. Zuraini, M. N. Somchit, M. H. Solihah et al., “Fatty acid and amino acid composition of three local Malaysian Channa spp. fish,” Food Chemistry, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 674–678, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. Burger, M. Gochfeld, C. Jeitner, S. Burke, and T. Stamm, “Metal levels in flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon) and great sculpin (Myoxocephalus polyacanthocephalus) from Adak Island, Alaska: potential risk to predators and fishermen,” Environmental Research, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. M. Liao and M. P. Ling, “Assessment of human health risks for arsenic bioaccumulation in tilapia (Oreochromis mossambicus) and large-scale mullet (Liza macrolepis) from blackfoot disease area in Taiwan,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 264–272, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Díez, S. Delgado, I. Aguilera et al., “Prenatal and early childhood exposure to mercury and methylmercury in spain, a high-fish-consumer country,” Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 615–622, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. A. Farkas and S. J. Specziar, “Age and size specific patterns of heavy metals in the organs of fresh water fish Abramis brama L. populating a low-contaminated site,” Water Research, vol. 37, pp. 959–964, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  15. S. A. Mansour and M. M. Sidky, “Ecotoxicological studies. 3. Heavy metals contaminating water and fish from Fayoum Governorate, Egypt,” Food Chemistry, vol. 78, no. 1, pp. 15–22, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. U. Çelik and J. Oehlenschläger, “High contents of cadmium, lead, zinc and copper in popular fishery products sold in Turkish supermarkets,” Food Control, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 258–261, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. Reilly, Metal Contamination of Food, Blackwell Science, Axford, UK, 3rd edition, 2002.
  18. H. Barton, “Predicted intake of trace elements and minerals via household drinking water by 6-year-old children from Kraków, Poland,” Part 3: Aluminium. Food Additives and Contaminants, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 588–603, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. O. D. Uluozlu, M. Tuzen, D. Mendil, and M. Soylak, “Assessment of trace element contents of chicken products from turkey,” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 163, no. 2-3, pp. 982–987, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. Liu, R. A. Goyer, and M. P. Waalker, “Toxic effects of metals,” in Casarrett and Doull’s Toxicology the Basic Science of Poisons, C. D. Klaassen, Ed., pp. 931–979, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  21. M. Canli and G. Atli, “The relationships between heavy metal (Cd, Cr, Cu, Fe, Pb, Zn) levels and the size of six Mediterranean fish species,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 121, no. 1, pp. 129–136, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. Camara, M. A. Amaro, R. Barbera, and G. Clemente, “Bioaccessibility of minerals in school meals: comparision between dialysis and solubility methods,” Food Chemistry, vol. 92, pp. 481–489, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  23. M. Tüzen, “Determination of heavy metals in fish samples of the middle Black Sea (Turkey) by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry,” Food Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 119–123, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. T. Agusa, T. Kunito, A. Sudaryanto et al., “Exposure assessment for trace elements from consumption of marine fish in Southeast Asia,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 766–777, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. S. J. Hamilton and P. M. Mehrle, “Methallothionein in fish: review of its importance in assessing stress from metal contaminants,” Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, vol. 115, no. 4, pp. 596–609, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  26. M. Roméo, Y. Siau, Z. Sidoumou, and M. Gnassia-Barelli, “Heavy metal distribution in different fish species from the Mauritania coast,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 232, no. 3, pp. 169–175, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. B. Yilmaz, “Levels of heavy metals (Fe, Cu, Ni, Cr, Pb, and Zn) in tissue of Mugil cephalus and Trachurus mediterraneus from Iskenderun Bay, Turkey,” Environmental Research, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 277–281, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. J. E. Marcovecchio and V. J. Moreno, “Cadmium, zinc and total mercury levels in the tissues of several fish species from La Planta river estuary, Argentina,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 119–130, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  29. G. W. Bryan and W. J. Langston, “Bioavailability, accumulation and effects of heavy metals in sediments with special reference to United Kingdom estuaries,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 89–131, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. Canli and R. W. Furness, “Toxicity of heavy metals dissolved in sea water and influences of sex and size on metal accumulation and tissue distribution in the Norway lobster Nephrops norvegicus,” Marine Environmental Research, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 217–236, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. M. Kalay, O. Aly, and M. Canli, “Heavy metal concentrations in fish tissues from the Northeast Mediterranean Sea,” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 673–681, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. U. Förstner and G. T. W. Wittmann, Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1981.
  33. A. T. Khan and J. S. Weis, “Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in two populations of mummichog (Fundulus heteroclitus),” Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–5, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  34. E. I. Adeyeye, N. J. Akinyugha, M. E. Fesobi, and V. O. Tenabe, “Determination of some metals in Clarias gariepinus (Cuvier and Vallenciennes), Cyprinus carpio (L.) and Oreochromis niloticus (L.) fishes in a polyculture fresh water pond and their environments,” Aquaculture, vol. 147, no. 3-4, pp. 205–214, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Burger, M. Gochfeld, C. Jeitner, S. Burke, and T. Stamm, “Metal levels in flathead sole (Hippoglossoides elassodon) and great sculpin (Myoxocephalus polyacanthocephalus) from Adak Island, Alaska: potential risk to predators and fishermen,” Environmental Research, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 62–69, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. A. R. Abdullah, N. M. Tahir, T. S. Loong, T. M. Hoque, and A. H. Sulaiman, “The GEF/UNDP/IMO Malacca Straits demonstration project: sources of pollution,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 39, no. 1-12, pp. 229–233, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. C. T. Eng, J. N. Paw, and F. Y. Guarin, “The environmental impact of aquaculture and the effects of pollution on coastal aquaculture development in Southeast Asia,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 335–343, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  38. K. Swami, C. D. Judd, J. Orsini, K. X. Yang, and L. Husain, “Microwave assisted digestion of atmospheric aerosol samples followed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry determination of trace elements,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 369, no. 1, pp. 63–70, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  39. R. Bou, F. Guardiola, A. Padró, E. Pelfort, and R. Codony, “Validation of mineralisation procedures for the determination of selenium, zinc, iron and copper in chicken meat and feed samples by ICP-AES and ICP-MS,” Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1361–1369, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. T. Agusa, T. Kunito, G. Yasunaga et al., “Concentrations of trace elements in marine fish and its risk assessment in Malaysia,” Marine Pollution Bulletin, vol. 51, no. 8-12, pp. 896–911, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. O. C. Vaidya and R. T. T. Rantala, “A comparative study of analytical methods: determination of heavy metals in mussels (Mytilus edulis) from eastern Canada,” International Journal of Environmental Analytical Chemistry, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 179–185, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  42. D. Mendil, Ö. F. Ünal, M. Tüzen, and M. Soylak, “Determination of trace metals in different fish species and sediments from the River Yeşili{dotless}rmak in Tokat, Turkey,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 1383–1392, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. DOE, “Environmental Quality Report,” Tech. Rep., Department of Environment, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  44. A. K. Ahmad, I. Mushrifah, and M. Shuhaimi-Othman, “Water quality and heavy metal concentrations in sediment of Sungai Kelantan, Kelantan, Malaysia: A baseline study,” Sains Malaysiana, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 435–442, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  45. WHO, Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality Volume 2: Health Criteria and Other Supporting Information, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1996.
  46. M. Dural, M. Z. L. Göksu, and A. A. Özak, “Investigation of heavy metal levels in economically important fish species captured from the Tuzla lagoon,” Food Chemistry, vol. 102, no. 1, pp. 415–421, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. Y. Tepe, M. Türkmen, and A. Türkmen, “Assessment of heavy metals in two commercial fish species of four Turkish seas,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 146, no. 1–3, pp. 277–284, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Türkmen, A. Türkmen, Y. Tepe, A. Ateş, and K. Gökkuş, “Determination of metal contaminations in sea foods from Marmara, Aegean and Mediterranean seas: twelve fish species,” Food Chemistry, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 794–800, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. P. Raja, S. Veerasingam, G. Suresh, G. Marichamy, and R. Venkatachalapath, “Heavy metals concentration in four commercially valuable marine edible fish species from Parangipettai coast, south east coast of India,” International Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–14, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  50. J. Irwandi and O. Farida, “Mineral and heavy metal contents of marine fin fish in Langkawi island, Malaysia,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 105–112, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  51. C. A. R. Mohamed, A. Samat, M. R. Otman, and W. M. Muda, “Kandungan Cd, Cr, Fe, Mn dan Al di dalam ikan di persekitaran stesen janakuasa electric, TNB, kapar. selangor,” Malaysia Journal of Analytical Sciences, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 87–92, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  52. T. Budiati, “The presence of arsenic as heavy metal contaminant on salmon : a risk assessment,” International Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 6–12, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  53. A. Deshpande, S. Bhendigeri, T. Shirsekar, D. Dhaware, and R. N. Khandekar, “Analysis of heavy metals in marine fish from Mumbai Docks,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 159, no. 1–4, pp. 493–500, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. K. Nor Hasyimah, V. J. Noik, Y. Y. Teh, C. Y. Lee, and H. C. Pearline, “Assessment of cadmium (Cd) and lead (Pb) levels in commercial marine fish organs between wet markets and supermarkets in Klang Valley, Malaysia,” International Food Research Journal, vol. 18, pp. 770–777, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  55. C. M. A. Iwegbue, “Heavy metal composition of livers and kidneys of cattle from southern Nigeria,” Veterinarski Arhiv, vol. 78, no. 5, pp. 401–410, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  56. H. Reynders, K. van Campenhout, L. Bervoets, W. M. De Coen, and R. Blust, “Dynamics of cadmium accumulation and effects in common carp (Cyprinus carpio) during simultaneous exposure to water and food (Tubifex tubifex),” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1558–1567, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. A. R. Linde, S. Sánchez-Galán, J. I. Izquierdo, P. Arribas, E. Marañón, and E. García-Vázquez, “Brown trout as biomonitor of heavy metal pollution: effect of age on the reliability of the assessment,” Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, vol. 40, no. 1-2, pp. 120–125, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. P. Kotze, H. H. Du Preez, and J. H. J. Van Vuren, “Bioaccumulation of copper and zinc in Oreochromis mossambicus and Clarias gariepinus, from the Olifants River, Mpumalanga, South Africa,” Water SA, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 99–110, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  59. Jezierska and M. Witeska, “Metal toxicity to fish. University of Podlasie,” Monografic, no. 42, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  60. B. Y. Kamaruzzaman, M. C. Ong, S. Z. Rina, and B. Joseph, “Levels of some heavy metals in fishes from Pahang river estuary, Pahang, Malaysia,” Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 157–161, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), “Compilation of legal limits for hazardous substances in fish and fishery products,” FAO Fishery Circular, no. 464, pp. 5–10, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
  62. World Health Organization, “Heavy metals-environmental aspects,” Environment Health Criteria , no. 85, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  63. H. I. Nasser and Y. T. Huat, “Malaysian Food and Regulations,” in Malaysian Law on Food and Drugs, Malaysia Law, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 1985. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Fathi Alhashmi Bashir et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.