Sugar Sweetened Beverage Consumption among Primary School Students: Influence of the Schools’ Vicinity

Table 4

Sequential modeling strategy.

	⁢Null model			Model 2			Model 3			Model 4
	OR	95% CI		OR	95% CI		OR	95% CI		OR	95% CI
Fixed part
Students ()
Gender
Girls				1.00			1.00			1.00
Boys				0.99	0.87	1.13	0.99	0.87	1.14	0.99	0.87	1.13
School cycle
1st cycle				1.00			1.00			1.00
2nd cycle				1.26	1.06	1.51	1.27	1.07	1.52	1.27	1.06	1.51
3rd cycle				1.46	1.23	1.73	1.48	1.24	1.76	1.47	1.24	1.74
Cultural origin
QC French				1.00			1.00			1.00
Others				1.26	1.02	1.56	1.23	0.99	1.53	1.25	1.01	1.55
Unknown				1.70	1.24	2.33	1.67	1.22	2.29	1.68	1.23	2.31
Physical activity
Organized				1.00			1.00			1.00
None				1.96	1.68	2.28	1.95	1.68	2.26	1.95	1.68	2.26
Unknown				1.79	1.47	2.18	1.79	1.47	2.19	1.78	1.46	2.16
Schools ()
SES
High							1.00
Middle							0.87	0.59	1.28
Low							1.57	1.08	2.28
Urban density
Lowest										1.00
Low										1.98	1.19	3.29
High										1.67	1.03	2.69
Highest										1.88	1.16	3.06
Random part
Variance (SE^†)	0.325 (0.101)			0.255 (0.085)			0.191 (0.070)			0.228 (0.079)
MOR^†	1.72			1.62			1.52			1.58
DIC^†	5796.5			5696.7			5696.4			5694.7
DIC change	—			99.83			0.275			2.019

SE: standard error, MOR: median odd ratio, and DIC: deviance information criterion.