Research Article

Comparative Analysis of Households Solid Waste Management in Rural and Urban Ghana

Table 6

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects.
(a)

SourceDependent variablesType III sum of squareDfMean square valuePartial eta square

Corrected modelPrincipal street16.039116.03914.4900.0000.033
Mkt center2.42412.4244.6790.0310.012
Lorry parks30.224130.22478.7370.0000.165
Dump sites2.84112.8417.2400.0070.018
Homes0.18610.1860.1240.7250.000

InterceptPrincipal street3853.79913853.7993241.3520.0000.891
Mkt center3057.78413057.7845901.5760.0000.937
Lorry parks810.3841810.3842111.1460.0000.841
Dump sites4712.00114712.00112009.3700.0000.968
Homes2505.44612505.4461668.1980.0000.807

LocationPrincipal street16.039116.03913.4900.0000.033
Mkt center2.42412.4244.6790.0310.012
Lorry parks30.224130.22478.7370.0000.165
Dump sites2.84112.8417.2400.0070.018
Homes0.18610.1860.1240.7250.000

ErrorPrincipal street473.2013981.189
Mkt center206.2163980.518
Lorry parks152.7763980.384
Dump sites156.1593980.392
Homes597.7513981.502

Source: field survey, 2015.
(b)

SourceDependent variablesType III sum of squareDf

TotalPrincipal street4408.000400
Mkt center3300.000400
Lorry parks1024.000400
Dump sites4920.000400
Homes3123.000400

Corrected TotalPrincipal street489.240399
Mkt center208.640399
Lorry parks183.000399
Dump sites159.000399
Homes597.937399

Source: field survey, 2015.