Research Article
Urban Dog Parks as Sources of Canine Parasites: Contamination Rates and Pet Owner Behaviours in Lisbon, Portugal
Table 1
Prevalence of the parasites detected in faecal samples collected in three dog parks (A, B, and C) of Greater Lisbon, Portugal.
| | A () (95% CI) | B () (95% CI) | C () (95% CI) | Total () (95% CI) |
| Hookworms | 14.4% (9.0–22.1) | 18.5% (12.4–26.7) | 16.7% (10.7–24.8) | 16.5% (13.0–20.8) | Cryptosporidium spp. | 12.0% (7.1–19.3) | 15.3% (9.7–23.2) | 8.3% (4.3–15.2) | 11.9% (8.9–15.8) | Giardia spp. | 16.0% (10.3–23.9) | 6.5% (3.0–12.7) | 11.7% (6.8–19.1) | 11.4% (8.4–15.2) | Cystoisospora spp. | 0.8% (0.0–5.0) | 1.6% (0.3–6.3) | 0.8% (0.0–5.2) | 1.1% (0.4–2.9) | Toxascaris leonina | 0 | 0 | 3.3% (1.1–8.8) | 1.1% (0.4–2.9) | Toxocara spp. | 0.8% (0.0–5.0) | 0.8% (0.0–5.1) | 0 | 0.5% (0.1–2.2) | Sarcocystis sp. | 0.8% (0.0–5.0) | 0 | 0 | 0.3% (0.0–1.7) |
| Total of positive samples | 35.2% (27.0–44.3) | 31.5% (23.6–40.5) | 32.5% (24.4–41.7) | 33.1% (28.3–38.2) |
|
|