Research Article

AHP-FSE-Based Risk Assessment and Mitigation for Slurry Balancing Shield Tunnel Construction

Table 7

Weight of safety risk assessment index system of slurry balancing tunnel.

Target layerFirst layerWeightsecond layerWeightThe third layerWeight

Risk of slurry shield constructionPersonnel risk (A)0.27Professional skills and experience (A1)0.56Working experience (A11)0.38
Safety skills (A12)0.20
Emergency capacity (A13)0.18
Safety consciousness (A14)0.24
Physical condition (A2)0.24Working strength (A21)0.59
Physical health (A22)0.41
Mental health status (A3)0.20Sense of discipline (A31)0.66
Working pressure (A32)0.34
Mechanical risk (B)0.25Mechanical use status (B1)0.41Mechanical failure condition (B11)0.48
Mechanical aging condition (B12)0.22
Mechanical wear condition (B13)0.30
Mechanical qualification status (B2)0.59Qualification rate of installation (B21)0.42
Qualification rate of maintenance (B22)0.58
Material risk (C)0.14Material quality status (C1)0.52Physical property (C11)0.63
Dimensional discrepancy (C12)0.37
Material storage status (C2)0.48Storage conditions (C21)0.46
Stacking condition (C22)0.54
Method risk (D)0.11Security system (D1)0.34Integrity degree (D11)0.26
Executive capacity (D12)0.44
Implementation effect (D13)0.30
Construction schemes (D2)0.66Work method (D21)0.42
Drawings change (D22)0.58
Environmental risk (E)0.23Geological environment (E1)0.47Geological conditions (E11)0.65
Geological disaster situation (E12)0.35
Social environment (E2)0.22Surrounding traffic conditions (E21)0.09
Settlement level of surrounding buildings (E22)0.49
Underground pipeline relocation (E23)0.42
Site environment (E3)0.31Safety facilities (E31)0.63
Water pollution (E32)0.37