Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Food Quality
Volume 2017 (2017), Article ID 7807292, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7807292
Research Article

A Decision-Making Model for Deterring Food Vendors from Selling Harmless Low-Quality Foods as High-Quality Foods to Consumers

Department of Advertising and Strategic Marketing, Ming Chuan University, No. 250 Zhong Shan N. Rd., Sec. 5, Taipei, Taiwan

Correspondence should be addressed to Po-Yu Chen

Received 3 November 2016; Accepted 29 December 2016; Published 31 January 2017

Academic Editor: Latiful Bari

Copyright © 2017 Po-Yu Chen. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. C. Ritson and L. W. Mai, “The economics of food safety,” Nutrition & Food Science, vol. 98, no. 5, pp. 253–259, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Henson and B. Traill, “The demand for food safety: market imperfections and the role of government,” Food Policy, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 152–162, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. D. Mensah and D. Julien, “Implementation of food safety management systems in the UK,” Food Control, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 1216–1225, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. E. Hanak, E. Boutrif, and M. Pineiro, “Food safety management in developing countries,” in Proceedings of the International Workshop, CIRAD-FAO, pp. 11–13, Montpellier, France, 2000.
  5. S. Henson and J. Caswell, “Food safety regulation: an overview of contemporary issues,” Food Policy, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 589–603, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Garcia Martinez, A. Fearne, J. A. Caswell, and S. Henson, “Co-regulation as a possible model for food safety governance: opportunities for public-private partnerships,” Food Policy, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 299–314, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. F. Wendler, “The public-private regulation of food safety through HACCP: what does it mean for the governance capacity of public and private actors?” in European Risk Governance: Its Science, Its Inclusiveness and Its Effectiveness, E. Vos, Ed., pp. 223–256, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  8. K. G. Grunert, “Food quality and safety: consumer perception and demand,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 369–391, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. B. E. Steiner, “Australian wines in the British wine market: a hedonic price analysis,” Agribusiness, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 287–307, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. R. Scarpa, M. Thiene, and L. Galletto, “Consumers wtp for wine with certified origin: preliminary results from latent classes based on attitudinal responses,” Journal of Food Products Marketing, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 231–248, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. E. Brentari, R. Levaggi, and P. Zuccolotto, “Pricing strategies for Italian red wine,” Food Quality and Preference, vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 725–732, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. S. Szathvary and S. Trestini, “A hedonic analysis of nutrition and health claims on fruit beverage products,” Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 505–517, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Brentari, R. Levaggi, and P. Zuccolotto, “A hedonic price analysis for the Italian wine in the domestic market,” Quality and Quantity, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 999–1012, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. Bonnet and M. Simioni, “Assessing consumer response to protected designation of origin labelling: a mixed multinomial logit approach,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 433–449, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. U. Enneking, “Willingness-to-pay for safety improvements in the German meat sector: the case of the Q&S label,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 205–223, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. Z. Pieniak, W. Verbeke, F. Vanhonacker, L. Guerrero, and M. Hersleth, “Association between traditional food consumption and motives for food choice in six European countries,” Appetite, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 101–108, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. Boccaletti and M. Nardella, “Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide-free fresh fruit and vegetables in Italy,” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 297–310, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Maruyama and M. Kikuchi, “Risk-learning process in forming willingness-to-pay for egg safety,” Agribusiness, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 167–179, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. A. Tarkiainen and S. Sundqvist, “Subjective norms, attitudes and intentions of Finnish consumers in buying organic food,” British Food Journal, vol. 107, no. 11, pp. 808–822, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. A. Botonaki, K. Polymeros, E. Tsakiridou, and K. Mattas, “The role of food quality certification on consumers' food choices,” British Food Journal, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 77–90, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. J. L. Lusk, J. A. Fox, T. C. Schroeder, J. Mintert, and M. Koohmaraie, “In-store valuation of steak tenderness,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 539–550, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. J. L. Lusk, L. O. House, C. Valli et al., “Effect of information about benefits of biotechnology on consumer acceptance of genetically modified food: evidence from experimental auctions in the United States, England, and France,” European Review of Agricultural Economics, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 179–204, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. L. Loureiro and W. J. Umberger, “A choice experiment model for beef: what US consumer responses tell us about relative preferences for food safety, country-of-origin labeling and traceability,” Food Policy, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 496–514, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. T. Bech-Larsen and K. G. Grunert, “The perceived healthiness of functional foods: a conjoint study of Danish, Finnish and American consumers' perception of functional foods,” Appetite, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 9–14, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. K. G. Grunert, T. Bech-Larsen, L. Lähteenmäki, Ø. Ueland, and A. Åström, “Attitudes towards the use of GMOs in food production and their impact on buying intention: the role of positive sensory experience,” Agribusiness, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 95–107, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. I. Siró, E. Kápolna, B. Kápolna, and A. Lugasi, “Functional food. Product development, marketing and consumer acceptance—a review,” Appetite, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 456–467, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. R. Adaval and K. B. Monroe, “Automatic construction and use of contextual information for product and price evaluations,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 572–588, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. Adaval and R. S. Wyer Jr., “Conscious and nonconscious comparisons with price anchors: effects on willingness to pay for related and unrelated products,” Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 355–365, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. J. R. Bettman, M. F. Luce, and J. W. Payne, “Constructive consumer choice processes,” Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 187–217, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus