Journal of Food Quality

Journal of Food Quality / 2017 / Article
Special Issue

Natural Preservatives to Improve Food Quality and Safety

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2017 |Article ID 9017452 | 8 pages | https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9017452

Development of a Chemically Defined Medium for Better Yield and Purification of Enterocin Y31 from Enterococcus faecium Y31

Academic Editor: Moreno Bondi
Received31 Mar 2017
Revised17 Jul 2017
Accepted02 Aug 2017
Published06 Sep 2017

Abstract

The macro- and micronutrients in traditional medium, such as MRS, used for cultivating lactic acid bacteria, especially for bacteriocin production, have not been defined, preventing the quantitative monitoring of metabolic flux during bacteriocin biosynthesis. To enhance Enterocin Y31 production and simplify steps of separation and purification, we developed a simplified chemically defined medium (SDM) for the growth of Enterococcus faecium Y31 and production of its bacteriocin, Enterocin Y31. We found that the bacterial growth was unrelated to Enterocin Y31 production in MRS; therefore, both the growth rate and the Enterocin Y31 production were set as the index for investigation. Single omission experiments revealed that 5 g/L NaCl, five vitamins, two nucleic acid bases, MgSO47H2O, MnSO44H2O, KH2PO4, K2HPO4, CH3COONa, fourteen amino acids, and glucose were essential for the strain’s growth and Enterocin Y31 production. Thus, a novel simplified and defined medium (SDM) was formulated with 30 components in total. Consequently, Enterocin Y31 production yield was higher in SDM as compared to either MRS or CDM. SDM improved the Enterocin Y31 production and simplified the steps of purification (only two steps), which has broad potential applications.

1. Introduction

Bacteriocins are ribosomally synthesised antimicrobial proteins or protein complexes that inhibit other bacteria, and they either have a narrow antimicrobial spectrum (against the same species) or broad antimicrobial spectrum (against across genera) [1, 2]. Bacteriocin produced by lactic acid bacteria (LAB) is generally regarded as safe (GRAS) and Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) status [3, 4], and it is a desirable trait as a food additive for extending the shelf-life of the fermented food and controlling the safety of foods [5, 6]. Based on their molecular structure, bacteriocins can be divided into four groups: class I bacteriocins contain posttranslational modifications (lantibiotics and molecular weight ≤ 5 kDa); class II bacteriocins are unmodified and include small, heat-stable nonlanthionine-containing peptides [7]. The third class includes large heat-labile bacteriocins. Finally, the fourth class comprises complex bacteriocins containing a protein moiety with one or more other lipids or carbohydrates [8]. Most bacteriocins produced by the Enterococcus faecium group of LAB are class II bacteriocins. One subgroup, class IIa, contains bacteriocins with certain sequence motifs in their N-terminal halves and is active against the food pathogen, Listeria monocytogenes [9]. Class IIa bacteriocins have become a focus of research owing to their low molecular weight, good dispersity, and high thermostability. This is also a case of Enterocin Y31 produced by E. faecium Y31 in the current work [10].

Enterocin Y31 is a class IIa bacteriocin produced by E. faecium Y31 [11]. Previous research results showed that Enterocin Y31 had broad spectrum inhibition activity against Bacillus subtilis ATCC 6633, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Listeria monocytogenes ATCC 19111, Bacillus cereus CICC 20463, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium ATCC 14028. The isoelectric point of Enterocin Y31 was 8.25; it was stable in both acidity and alkalescence conditions; hence, Enterocin Y31 has a broad application prospect (not published). However, two main drawbacks of Enterocin Y31 with regard to application in foods are as follows: () bacteriocins are secreted in very small quantities in the production media; and () the media used to grow the bacteriocin-producing strains are very complex [12], as the LAB are fastidious organisms requiring amino acids, B vitamins, and various minerals for their growth. These components are normally provided by sources such as soybean meal, yeast extract, and meat extract. All of these sources contain proteins and peptides as sources of amino acids, which are often very closely related to the bacteriocin produced. Therefore, purification of bacteriocin from such a complex medium requires a series of steps. At each step, there is some loss, and sometimes after the final purification, the antimicrobial activity may be completely lost. Complex media do not allow the examination of all individual medium factors [13, 14] affecting bacteriocin production.

Ricciardi reported a modified chemically defined medium to promote the growth of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus plantarum groups [15]. In the present study, we improved the chemically defined medium to improve the yield of Enterocin Y31 produced by E. faecium Y31. There are four objectives of this study: () to develop a new and improved production method for Enterocin Y31 (produced by E. faecium Y31), () to determine the macro- and micronutrients necessary for cultivating E. faecium Y31 and improving Enterocin Y31 production, () to develop a novel and simple separation and purification method for Enterocin Y31 (avoiding a series of chromatography steps and the loss of Enterocin Y31 activity), and () to compare Enterocin Y31 production in a defined medium with that in a complex medium. This is feasible using a completely defined medium, and a minimal medium for bacteriocin production can thus be established.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Strains and Growth Conditions

The bacteriocin-producer strain E. faecium Y31 isolated from Chinese traditional fermented foods (fermented vegetable juice from Lanzhou) was previously found to produce class IIa bacteriocin [10], which was maintained as stock cultures in MRS medium with 18% glycerol at −80°C.

Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was selected as a sensitive strain for antimicrobial activity assays, because the bacteriocin produced by E. faecium Y31 has the highest activity against E. coli ATCC 25922 in gram-negative bacteria.

2.2. Medium

The growth of E. faecium Y31 and production of Enterocin Y31 in a defined medium in a fermenter were compared with those in MRS (reference medium) used for the optimisation of the growth of E. faecium Y31 and the production of Enterocin Y31. This medium CDM consisted of 44 components described by Khan et al. [12] (listed in Table 1). All chemicals used for the preparation of the defined medium were of analytical grade and obtained from either Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA) or BDH Chemicals Ltd. (Poole, UK). For all the experiments, aqueous stock solutions of the individual components were prepared in the appropriate concentrations and sterilized by autoclaving, with the exception of the heat-sensitive components. The heat-sensitive amino acids (asparagine, glutamine, and tryptophan), all of the B vitamins, and FeSO4 were filter-sterilized (pore size 0.22 μm membrane; Millipore Corp., Billerica, MA, USA). All the stock solutions were then stored at 4°C except FeSO4 which was freshly prepared before each experiment because it is prone to oxidation during storage. In addition to the defined medium, MRS medium was used as a reference for comparison with the defined medium before each experiment.


ConstituentContent
CDMSDM

Amino acids (g L−1)
 L-Asparagine1.001.00
 L-Aspartic acid1.00
 L-Glutamic acid1.001.00
 L -Glutamine1.00
 L-Cys1.001.00
 L-Alanine1.00
 L-Arginine1.001.00
 Glycine1.001.00
 L-Histidine1.001.00
 L-Isoleucine1.001.00
 L-Leucine1.001.00
 L-Lysine1.001.00
 L-Methionine1.001.00
 L-Phenylalanine1.001.00
 L-Proline1.00
 L-Serine1.001.00
 L-Threonine1.001.00
 L-Tryptophan1.001.00
 L-Tyrosine1.00
 L-Valine1.00
Nucleic acid bases (g L−1)
 Ademome.SO40.020.02
 Guanine0.02
 Inosine0.02
 Xanthine0.02
 Uracil0.020.02
 Thymine0.02
 Orotic acid0.02
B vitamins (mgL−1)
 Biotin20.0020.00
 Para-aminobenzoic acid10.00
 Nicotinic acid2.002.00
 Ca-pantothenic acid20.0020.00
 Riboflavin2.002.00
 Folic acid2.002.00
 Cyanocobalamin2.00
 Thiamine10.00
 Pyridoxal20.00
Minerals (gL−1)
 Manganese sulfate0.050.05
 Magnesium sulfate0.10.10
 Ferrous sulfate.7H2O0.02
 CaCl2
 Sodium citrate5.005.00
 Potassium dihydrogen phosphate2.002.00
 Dipotassium hydrogen phosphate7.007.00
Carbon source (gL−1)
 Glucose15.0015.00
Others (gL−1)
 Tween 801.001.00
 Glycerol
 NaCl5.00

2.3. Determination of the Antimicrobial Activity of Enterocin Y31

The antimicrobial activity of bacteriocin was monitored using the agar well diffusion assay (AWDA) as described previously [16] with some modifications. E. faecium Y31 was cultured for two or three generations, and then the cell-free supernatants (CFSs) of E. faecium Y31 were prepared by centrifuging for 30 min at 10000 ×g. Aliquots (80 μL) of the cell-free supernatants (CFSs) of E. faecium Y31 were added to the wells (6 mm diameter) on double-layer agar plates previously inoculated with 0.2 mL overnight culture of the indicator strain E. coli ATCC 25922. Plates were kept static at room temperature for 3 h to allow diffusion of the CFSs evenly in the agar, and then the plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The bacteriocin titre was determined by eliminating the effect of the organic acid, eliminating the effect of H2O2, and protease verification. The diameter of the zone of inhibition (not including the wells) was measured using a Vernier caliper. An arbitrary unit (AU/mL) was defined as the reciprocal of the highest dilution that produced an inhibition zone. Specific activity was expressed as that unit per milligram of protein.

2.4. Protein Concentration Determination

Protein concentration was determined by the BCA (bicinchoninic acid) microassay method (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) [17].

2.5. Monitoring of the Growth of E. faecium Y31

The OD value of the fermentation liquid of E. faecium Y31 was monitored with UV spectrophotometry at 600 nm each hour. Sterile culture medium was used as blanks to subtract the background value. Samples having an OD600 nm value of more than 0.7 were diluted with the sterile culture medium, and the corrected OD value was obtained by multiplying the dilution factor. ODmax (600 nm) represents the maximum OD value of the growth of E. faecium Y31. ODmax (600 nm) was calculated before any centrifugation.

2.6. Determination of the Relative Growth Rate

The relative growth rate was calculated according to Monod [18]. The following equation was used to calculate the growth rate:where is the relative growth rate (h−1), ln is the symbol for natural logarithm, and OD1 and OD2 are the corrected OD.

2.7. Effects of NaCl, CaCl2, and Glycerol on the Growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 Production

To determine the effects of these components, 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 15 g/L, and 20 g/L NaCl, 10 g/L CaCl2, and 50 g/L glycerol were individually added to 1000 mL CDM, and CDM medium with no addtions was used as a control, wherein the inoculum size was 2%, fermentation temperature was 37°C, and inoculum time was 24 h. The culturing liquid was then centrifuged for 20 min at 10000 ×g, and then the CFSs were used to determine Enterocin Y31 activity and ODmax (24 h).

2.8. Effects of Individually Omitting Each Amino Acid, B Vitamin, Mineral, and Nucleic Acid Base on the Growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 Production

According to the Leave One Out (LOO) technique, each amino acid, B vitamin, mineral, and nucleic acid base was sequentially and individually omitted from 1000 mL CDM medium, and CDM without additions was used as a control. The inoculum size was 2%, fermentation temperature was 37°C, and inoculation time was 24 h. The culture liquid was then centrifuged for 20 min at 10,000 ×g, and then the CFSs were used to determine Enterocin Y31 activity and ODmax (24 h).

The following terms were used to describe the relationship between each medium component and growth, as determined by the single omission technique. A constituent was considered essential if its omission resulted in less than half the maximum strain growth rate and production of bacteriocin of the positive control, stimulatory when its absence resulted in the fact that the growth rate and the bacteriocin production was between 50% and 80% of that observed in complete CDM, and nonessential if the growth rate and Enterocin Y31 production was 80% (or more) of that obtained in the complete CDM.

2.9. Purification of Enterocin Y31

E. faecium Y31 was allowed to grow in the SDM (Table 1) for 24 h. The cells were then removed by centrifugation (11,800 ×g, 25 min). The CFSs were then filtered through a 022 μm filter (low-protein-binding HVLP filter; Millipore Corp.) to remove any remaining cells. These filtered CFSs were referred to as crude bacteriocin. The crude bacteriocin was subjected to ultrafiltration of 1 kDa and 30 kDa. The retentate from the 1 kDa step was then subjected to Tricine-SDS-PAGE.

2.10. Statistical Analyses

All experiments were preformed separately three times, and mean standard deviation (SD) values were calculated from triplicate determinations. All data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (one-way ANOVA). Comparison of means was performed with Duncan’s multiple range tests. Statistical significance was set at .

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Relationship between the Growth of the Strain and Enterocin Y31 Activity

The growth of E. faecium Y31 was unrelated to Enterocin Y31 activity in MRS medium, as shown in Figure 1. The result was consistent with the result of Bacterocin J23 produced by Lactobacillus paracasei J23 as described by Huaxi Yi in our research group (not published), which was inconsistent with the result of Salivaricin produced by L. salivarius CRL 1328 [19]; thus, the growth rate of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 activity were used as detection indexes for developing a novel chemical defined medium. Enterocin Y31 activity could be detected at the exponential phase of the producing strain (9 h) and reached its highest value of  mm at stationary phase of producing strain (24 h). ODmax remained stable at 16 h of fermentation of strain Y31; thus, ODmax (16 h) was used as an index of the strain growth status.

3.2. Effect of NaCl Concentration on the Growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 Production

The effect of NaCl at 5 g/L, 10 g/L, 15 g/L, and 20 g/L was determined in CDM with CDM with no additives as the control. The results indicated that the growth of E. faecium Y31 and production of Enterocin Y31 were not significant difference when adding 5 g/L or 10 g/L NaCl and 0 g/L and 15 g/L NaCl had no effect on the growth of strain Y31 and production of Enterocin Y31. When the concentration of NaCl was 20%, the growth of E. faecium Y31 and production of Enterocin Y31 reduced, which showed the significant difference when compared to 0 g/L and 15 g/L NaCl. We can conclude that 20 g/L NaCl have a negative effect on the growth of strain Y31 and the production of Enterocin Y31. When the adding concentration of NaCl was 5 g/L, the ODmax (16 h) of E. faecium Y31 was highest , and the antibacterial activity also reached the maximum value  AU/mg protein. Based the significant difference analysis, we could conclude that 5 g/L NaCl stimulated the growth of strain Y31 () and had no effect on the production of Enterocin Y31 (Figure 2). Similar results have been reported in a study of nutritional requirements of L. salivarius CRL 1328 producing Salivaricin [19]. Considering that the condition for the growth of E. faecium Y31 was crucial, 5 g/L NaCl was added to the novel chemically defined medium SDM (the medium ingredients of SDM were listed in Table 1).

3.3. Effect of CaCl2 and Glycerol on the Growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 Production

The results shown in Table 2 indicated that adding 10 g/L CaCl2 to CDM had no effect on the growth of E. faecium Y31 but had a negative effect on the production of Enterocin Y31 (), whereas adding 50 g/L glycerol had a slight negative effect on the growth of E. faecium Y31 () and a negative influence on Enterocin Y31 production ().


Added componentsODmax (600 nm) after 16 hEnterocin Y31 production (AU/mg protein)

None (CDM)
10 g/L CaCl2
50 g/L glycerol

Note: CDM is explained in Table 1, and means in the same row not sharing a common superscript letter are significantly different from each other ().
3.4. Effect of Individually Omitting Each Amino Acid, B Vitamin, Mineral, and Nucleic Acid Base on the Growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 Production

According to the Leave One Out (LOO) technique, each amino acid, B vitamin, mineral, and nucleic acid base was sequentially omitted in a series of prepared formulations, along with CDM as a control. The results shown in Table 3 indicated that L-Arg, L-Gly, L-His, L-Leu, L-Met, L-Phe, L-Thr, L-Ser, and L-Cys are essential amino acids which had an effect on the growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 production, and the stimulatory amino acids mainly included L-Asn, L-Glu, L-Iso, L-Lys, and L-Try. Omitting the stimulatory amino acids resulted in the slow growth of E. faecium Y31 and low production of Enterocin Y31. Therefore, the essential amino acids and stimulatory amino acids were included in the SDM (listed in Table 1). A previous study reported the similar results, as Zhang et al. found that six amino acids (arginine, histidine, isoleucine, leucine, methionine, and valine) were necessary for the lactococci, enterococci, and streptococci [20].


Omitted amino acidODmax (16 h)Relative growth rateEnterocin Y31 production (AU/mg protein)

None (CDM)100
L-Ala90
L-Argn.g.
L-Asp93
L-Asn60
L-Cys44
L-Glu72
L-Gln84
L-Glyn.g.
L-Hisn.g.
L-Iso79
L-Leun.g.
L-Lys80
L-Metn.g.
L-Phen.g.
L-Pro71
L-Sern.g.
L-Thrn.g.
L-Try80
L-Tyr100
L-Val98

Note: “n.g.” represents that the strain did not grow and “—” represents that there was no inhibition activity. CDM is explained in Table 1, and means in the same row not sharing a common superscript letter are significantly different from each other ().

Pyridoxal and pantothenic acid are essential B vitamins which had an effect on the growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 production, and the stimulatory B vitamins mainly included niacin and riboflavin. Wherein the stimulatory B vitamins could not result in the growth arrest of E. faecium Y31 and the biosynthesis arrest of Enterocin Y31, they could cause low growth rate and low biosynthesis volume. Therefore, the essential and stimulatory B vitamins were needed in the SDM. Omitting folic acid would cause a reduction of 80% in the ODmax (16 h) of E. faecium Y31; therefore folic acid is also needed for the growth of E. faecium Y31 and the production of Enterocin Y31 (Figure 3). It has been reported that nutritional requirements of L. delbrueckii ssp. lactis CRL 581 growth were nicotinic acid and pyridoxal and pantothenic acid, whereas the growth of L. delbrueckii ssp. lactis CRL 654 requires niacin and pantothenic acid, and riboflavin and cyanocobalamin were found to be stimulatory for both strains [21]. Research results about S. thermophilus strains (ST1, ST7, ST8, ST11, ST18, and ST21) indicated that riboflavin was essential for the growth of all strains, whereas Ca-pantothenic acid and nicotinic acid were also required [22].

In the present study, MgSO47H2O was an essential mineral and MnSO44H2O, KH2PO4, K2HPO4, and CH3COONa were stimulatory minerals which had an effect on the growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 production (Figure 4). The necessity of magnesium and phosphate has previously been reported by other researchers for various LAB species [20, 23, 24].

Adenine and uracil are stimulatory nucleic acids which had an effect on the growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 production (Figure 5). No nucleic acid was essential for the growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 production.

3.5. Comparison of Enterocin Y31 Production on MRS Medium and SDM

A novel chemical defined medium (SDM) was developed (Table 1 and Figures 3, 4, and 5), and SDM contained NaCl, L-Arg, L-Gly, L-His, L-Leu, L-Met, L-Phe, L-Thr, L-Ser, L-Cys, L-Asn, L-Glu, L-Iso, L-Lys, L-Try, pyridoxal, pantothenic acid, niacin, riboflavin, folic acid, MgSO47H2O, MnSO4·4H2O, KH2PO4, K2HPO4, CH3COONa, adenine, and uracil. Strain Y31 grew better on SDM than on MRS medium (Figure 6). As shown in Figure 7, Enterocin Y31 production on SDM was 1.6 times than that on MRS.

3.6. Purification and Characterization of Enterocin Y31

After the removal of cells from the defined medium, the cell-free supernatant was subjected to ultrafiltration through a 30 kDa ultrafiltration membrane. The active permeate liquor was then subjected to a second ultrafiltration step using a 1 kDa NMWL. The antimicrobial activity was again found in the retentate (10240 AU/L). Enterocin Y31 was purified by Tricine-SDS-PAGE and its molecular weight was 6.74 kDa (showed in Figure 8).

4. Conclusion

When culturing E. faecium Y31 using novel chemical defined medium (SDM) Enterocin Y31 production increased 1.6 times than that on MRS. The ingredients were composed of NaCl, L-Arg, L-Gly, L-His, L-Leu, L-Met, L-Phe, L-Thr, L-Ser, L-Cys, L-Asn, L-Glu, L-Iso, L-Lys, L-Try, pyridoxal, pantothenic acid, niacin, riboflavin, folic acid, MgSO47H2O, MnSO44H2O, KH2PO4, K2HPO4, CH3COONa, adenine, uracil, and glucose, which were the macro- and micronutrients needed by biosynthesis of Enterocin Y31. SDM was helpful to the growth of E. faecium Y31 and Enterocin Y31 production improvement. In addition, SDM avoided a series of chromatography steps and the loss of Enterocin Y31 activity; only two steps of ultrafiltration and Tricine-SDS-PAGE were needed to separate and purify Enterocin Y31. Therefore, chemically defined medium has better potential for improving the bacteriocin production and reducing the steps of separation and purification. Chemically defined media is useful for purification of not only large bacteriocins such as Enterocin Y31, but also small peptide bacteriocins. The alternative use of a chemically defined medium meets the nutritional requirements of strains producing bacteriocins and therefore is an excellent alternative to reduce the load of contaminating peptides from the medium, thereby decreasing the purification steps. To our knowledge, no such studies have been conducted to improve class IIa bacteriocin Enterocin Y31 production and purify Enterocin Y31.

Ethical Approval

This study complies with the research ethics guidelines and it does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was financially supported by the 60th Financial Grant from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant no. 2016M602534), the Youth Innovation Talents Project of General Higher School in Guangdong Province (2016KQNCX144), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants nos. 31571850, 31771988, and 31701621).

References

  1. R. C. R. Martinez, M. Wachsman, N. I. Torres, J. G. LeBlanc, S. D. Todorov, and B. D. G. D. M. Franco, “Biochemical, antimicrobial and molecular characterization of a noncytotoxic bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus plantarum ST71KS,” Food Microbiology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 376–381, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. I. M. Aasen, T. Møretrø, T. Katla, L. Axelsson, and I. Storrø, “Influence of complex nutrients, temperature and pH on bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus sakei CCUG 42687,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 159–166, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. P. Alvarez-Sieiro, M. Montalbán-López, D. Mu, and O. P. Kuipers, “Bacteriocins of lactic acid bacteria: extending the family,” Applied microbiology and biotechnology, vol. 100, no. 7, pp. 2939–2951, 2016. View at: Google Scholar
  4. F. A. C. Martinez, E. M. Balciunas, A. Converti, P. D. Cotter, and R. P. De Souza Oliveira, “Bacteriocin production by Bifidobacterium spp. A review,” Biotechnology Advances, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 482–488, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. E. F. O'Shea, P. D. Cotter, R. P. Ross, and C. Hill, “Strategies to improve the bacteriocin protection provided by lactic acid bacteria,” Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 130–134, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. A.-M. Zouhir, E. Kheadr, I. Tahiri, J. Ben Hamida, and I. Fliss, “Combination with plant extracts improves the inhibitory action of divergicin m35 against Listeria monocytogenes,” Journal of Food Quality, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 13–33, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. J. Pei, Y. Yuan, and T. Yue, “Primary characterization of bacteriocin paracin C - A novel bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus paracasei,” Food Control, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 168–176, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. D. Drider and S. Rebuffat, “Classification of Bacteriocins from Gram-Positive Bacteria,” in Prokaryotic Antimicrobial Peptides, pp. 29–53, Springer New York, NY, USA, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. T. Aymerich, H. Holo, L. S. Håvarstein, M. Hugas, M. Garriga, and I. F. Nes, “Biochemical and genetic characterization of enterocin A from Enterococcus faecium, a new antilisterial bacteriocin in the pediocin family of bacteriocins,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 1676–1682, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  10. W. Liu, L. Zhang, H. Yi et al., “Qualitative detection of class IIa bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria from traditional Chinese fermented food using a YGNGV-motif-based assay,” Journal of Microbiological Methods, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 121–127, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. W. Liu, L. Zhang, J. Shi et al., “Assessment of the safety and applications of bacteriocinogenic Enterococcus faecium Y31 as an adjunct culture in North-eastern Chinese traditional fermentation paocai,” Food Control, vol. 50, pp. 637–644, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. H. Khan, S. H. Flint, and P.-L. Yu, “Development of a chemically defined medium for the production of enterolysin A from Enterococcus faecalis B9510,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 1092–1102, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. M. Silva d, M. Andrade d S, A. Bauermeister et al., “A Simple Defined Medium for the Production of True Diketopiperazines in Xylella Fastidiosa and Their Identification by Ultra-Fast Liquid Chromatography-Electrospray Ionization Ion Trap Mass Spectrometry,” Molecules, vol. 22, no. 6, p. 985, 2017. View at: Google Scholar
  14. E. Texeira, J. Checa, A. Ríal et al., “A New Chemically Defined Medium for Cultivation of Streptococcus Pneumoniae Serotype,” Journal of Biotech Research, vol. 6, p. 54, 2015. View at: Google Scholar
  15. A. Ricciardi, R. G. Ianniello, E. Parente, and T. Zotta, “Modified chemically defined medium for enhanced respiratory growth of Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus plantarum groups,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 776–785, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. U. Schillinger and K. Lücke F, “Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus sake isolated from meat,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1901–1906, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  17. P. K. Smith, R. I. Krohn, G. Hermanson et al., “Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid,” Analytical biochemistry, vol. 150, no. 1, pp. 76–85, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. Monod, “The Growth of Bacterial Cultures,” Annual Reviews in Microbiology, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 371–394, 1949. View at: Google Scholar
  19. E. V. Pingitore, E. M. Hebert, F. Sesma, and M. E. Nader-Macías, “Influence of vitamins and osmolites on growth and bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus salivarius CRL 1328 in a chemically defined medium,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 304–310, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. G. Zhang, D. A. Mills, and D. E. Block, “Development of chemically defined media supporting high-cell-density growth of Lactococci, Enterococci, and Streptococci,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 75, no. 4, pp. 1080–1087, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. E. M. Hébert, R. R. Raya, and G. S. De Giori, “Nutritional requirements of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis in a chemically defined medium,” Current Microbiology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 341–345, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. C. Letort and V. Juillard, “Development of a minimal chemically-defined medium for the exponential growth of Streptococcus thermophilus,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 1023–1029, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. N. Terrade and R. Mira de Orduña, “Determination of the essential nutrient requirements of wine-related bacteria from the genera Oenococcus and Lactobacillus,” International Journal of Food Microbiology, vol. 133, no. 1-2, pp. 8–13, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. F. M. Saguir and M. C. M. De Nadra, “Improvement of a chemically defined medium for the sustained growth of Lactobacillus plantarum: nutritional requirements,” Current Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 414–418, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2017 Wenli Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1561 Views | 400 Downloads | 1 Citation
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.