Research Article

Food Integrity and Food Technology Concerns in Canada: Evidence from Two Public Surveys

Table 4

Summary statistics for variables included in the models.

20162017
Food Integrity
and GM subsample
Nanotechnology
subsample
Food integrity
and GM
subsample
Nanotechnology subsample

Food integrity concern
(0–5)
3.58
(1.00)
3.58
(0.98)
3.51
(1.00)
3.48
(0.98)
GM concern
(1–5)
3.32
(1.21)
3.29
(1.23)
Nanotechnology concern
(1–5)
3.13
(1.13)
3.13
(1.13)
Sociodemographic variables
French18.7%18.5%18.3%17.7%
Age45.5
(16.8)
44.6
(16.8)
46.2
(16.8)
45.1
(16.9)
Male48.4%51.3%47.9%50.5%
Presence of children < 18 years19.4%19.5%18.0%18.1%
Education15.2
(1.99)
15.3
(1.96)
15.2
(1.98)
15.1
(2.00)
City70.4%70.5%71.1%71.5%
Church (0–5)1.98
(1.39)
2.05
(1.42)
2.02
(1.43)
2.05
(1.43)
Farm11.0%11.0%10.9%11.3%
Income ($1,000.00)77.7
(35.7)
76.7
(35.7)
77.7
(35.9)
76.6
(36.2)
Regular shopper 
(1–5)
4.44
(0.86)
4.41
(0.90)
4.39
(0.89)
4.37
(0.89)
Self-rated knowledge
Knowledge of science and technology (0–10)5.39
(2.36)
5.55
(2.36)
5.29
(2.35)
5.49
(2.35)
Knowledge of environmental problems (0–10)5.82
(2.20)
5.90
(2.20)
5.78
(2.18)
5.85
(2.18)
Science benefit attitude (0–10)7.12
(2.08)
7.05
(2.13)
6.95
(2.14)
6.92
(2.14)
Trust
Generalized trust in people49.9%49.0%46.9%47.4%
Trust in government (1–5)2.95
(1.05)
2.93
(1.07)
2.91
(1.01)
2.91
(1.02)
Trust in industry (1–5)2.77
(0.75)
2.76
(0.77)
2.76
(0.70)
2.75
(0.71)
Trust in research organizations/universities (1–5)3.37
(0.96)
3.34
(0.96)
3.34
(0.92)
3.31
(0.93)
Trust in advocacy groups 
(1–5)
2.90
(0.85)
2.88
(0.85)
2.86
(0.75)
2.83
(0.75)
Environmental concern
NHIP (0–25)20.1
(3.73)
19.9
(3.81)
19.7
(3.87)
19.5
(3.97)
Myth of nature 149.2%49.4%44.3%42.6%
Myth of nature 239.3%38.4%41.0%41.7%
Myth of nature 32.14%2.26%2.97%3.47%
Myth of nature 48.94%9.46%10.9%11.5%
Health engagement (0–40)27.4
(5.17)
27.2
(5.15)
27.1
(4.95)
26.8
(4.84)
Sample size1633119516181240