Research Article
Combination of an E-Nose and an E-Tongue for Adulteration Detection of Minced Mutton Mixed with Pork
Table 4
Comparison results of discriminant analysis for responses of E-nose and E-tongue to minced mutton adulterated with pork.
| Discrimination method | Evaluation indices | E-nose | E-tongue | 75th s | 120th s |
| Bayesian discriminant analysis | Number of misclassified | 7 | 0 | Percentage of misclassified (%) | 5.83 | 0 | CDA-linear discriminant function | Number of misclassified | 13 | 3 | Percentage of misclassified (%) | 10.83 | 2.5 | CDA-quadratic discriminant function | Number of misclassified | 13 | 2 | Percentage of misclassified (%) | 10.83 | 1.67 | ā | Averaged percentage of misclassified (%) | 9.16 | 1.39 |
|
|