Abstract

The embedding theorems in weighted Besov-Lions type spaces 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝑞,𝛾 (Ω;𝐸0,𝐸) in which 𝐸0,𝐸 are two Banach spaces and 𝐸0𝐸 are studied. The most regular class of interpolation space 𝐸𝛼 between 𝐸0 and E is found such that the mixed differential operator 𝐷𝛼 is bounded from 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝑞,𝛾 (Ω;𝐸0,𝐸) to 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝑞,𝛾 (Ω;𝐸𝛼) and Ehrling-Nirenberg-Gagliardo type sharp estimates are established. By using these results, the uniform separability of degenerate abstract differential equations with parameters and the maximal B-regularity of Cauchy problem for abstract parabolic equations are obtained. The infinite systems of the degenerate partial differential equations and Cauchy problem for system of parabolic equations are further studied in applications.

1. Introduction

Embedding theorems in function spaces have been elaborated in [13]. A comprehensive introduction to the theory of embedding of function spaces and historical references may also be found in [4, 5]. Embedding theorems in abstract function spaces have been studied in [2, 618]. The anisotropic Sobolev spaces 𝑊𝑙𝑝(Ω;𝐻0,𝐻), Ω𝑅𝑛, and corresponding weighted spaces have been investigated in [11, 1316, 18], respectively. Embedding theorems in Banach-valued Besov spaces have been studied in [68, 17, 19]. Moreover, boundary value problems (BVPs) for differential-operator equations (DOEs) have been studied in [4, 5, 20, 21]. The solvability and the spectrum of BVPs for elliptic DOEs have also been refined in [7, 1318, 2226]. A comprehensive introduction to the differential-operator equations and historical references may be found in [4, 5]. In these works, Hilbert-valued function spaces essentially have been considered.

Let 𝑙=(𝑙1,𝑙2,,𝑙𝑛) and 𝑠=(𝑠1,𝑠2,,𝑠𝑛). Let 𝐸0 and 𝐸 be Banach spaces such that 𝐸0 is continuously and densely embedded in 𝐸. In the present paper, the weighted Banach-valued Besov space 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸0,𝐸) is to be introduced. The smoothest interpolation class 𝐸𝛼 between 𝐸0, 𝐸 (i.e., to find the possible small 𝜎𝛼 for 𝐸𝛼=(𝐸0,𝐸)𝜎𝛼,𝑝) is found such that the appropriate mixed differential operators 𝐷𝛼 are bounded from 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸0,𝐸) to 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸𝛼). By applying these results, the maximal 𝐵-regularity of certain classes of anisotropic partial DOE with parameters is derived. The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 collects notations and definitions. Section 3 presents embedding theorems in Besov-Lions space 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸0,𝐸). Section 4 contains applications of corresponding embedding theorems to vector-valued function spaces, and Section 5 is devoted to applications of these embedding theorems to anisotropic DOE with parameters for which the uniformly maximal 𝐵-regularity is obtained. Then, in Section 6, by using these results, the maximal 𝐵-regularity of parabolic Cauchy problem is shown. In Section 7, this DOE is applied to BVP and Cauchy problem for infinite systems of quasielliptic and parabolic PDE, respectively.

2. Notations and Definitions

Let 𝐸 be a Banach space and 𝛾=𝛾(𝑥) a nonnegative measurable weighted function defined on a domain Ω𝑅𝑛. Let 𝐿𝑝,𝛾(Ω;𝐸) denote the space of strongly measurable 𝐸-valued functions that are defined on Ω with the norm 𝑓𝐿𝑝,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)=𝑓(𝑥)𝑝𝐸𝛾(𝑥)𝑑𝑥1/𝑝,1𝑝<,𝑓𝐿,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)=esssup𝑥Ω𝑓(𝑥)𝐸.𝛾(𝑥)(2.1)

Let 𝑅,𝑚𝑁, and 𝑒𝑖,𝑖=1,2,,𝑛 be the standard unit vectors in 𝑅𝑛. Let (see [1, Section  16])Δ𝑖()𝑓(𝑥)=𝑓𝑥+𝑒𝑖𝑓(𝑥),,Δ𝑚𝑖()𝑓(𝑥)=Δ𝑖Δ()𝑖𝑚1=()𝑓(𝑥)𝑚𝑘=0(1)𝑚+𝑘𝐶𝑘𝑚𝑓𝑥+𝑘𝑒𝑖.(2.2)

Let Δ𝑚𝑖Δ(Ω,)=𝑚𝑖(),for𝑥,𝑥+𝑚𝑦𝑒𝑖Ω,0,for𝑥,𝑥+𝑚𝑦𝑒𝑖𝑅𝑛Ω.(2.3)

Let 𝐿𝜃(𝐸) be a 𝐸-valued function space such that𝑢𝐿𝜃(𝐸)=0𝑢(𝑡)𝜃𝐸𝑑𝑡𝑡1/𝜃<.(2.4)

Let 𝑚𝑖 be positive integers, 𝑘𝑖 nonnegative integers, 𝑠𝑖 positive numbers, and 𝑚𝑖>𝑠𝑖𝑘𝑖>0,𝑖=1,2,,𝑛,𝑠=(𝑠1,𝑠2,,𝑠𝑛),  1𝑝,1𝜃,0<𝑦0<. Let 𝐹 denote the Fourier transform. The Banach-valued Besov space 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸) is defined as 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)=𝑓𝑓𝐿𝑝(Ω;𝐸),𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(Ω;𝐸)=𝑓𝐿𝑝,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)+𝑛𝑖=100[(𝑠𝑖𝑘𝑖)𝑞+1]Δ𝑚𝑖𝑖(,Ω)𝐷𝑘𝑖𝑖𝑓𝜃𝐿𝑝,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)𝑑𝑦1/𝜃<,1𝜃<,𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)=𝑛𝑖=1sup0<<0Δ𝑚i𝑖(,Ω)𝐷𝑘𝑖𝑖𝑓𝐿𝑝,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)𝑠𝑖𝑘𝑖for𝜃=.(2.5)

For 𝐸=𝑅 and 𝛾(𝑥)1, we obtain a scalar-valued anisotropic Besov space 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω) [1, Section  18].

Let 𝐂 be the set of complex numbers and𝑆𝜑=||||𝜆;𝜆𝐂,arg𝜆𝜑{0},0𝜑<𝜋.(2.6)

A linear operator 𝐴 is said to be a 𝜑-positive in a Banach space 𝐸 with bound 𝑀>0 if 𝐷(𝐴) is dense on 𝐸 and (𝐴+𝜆𝐼)1𝐿(𝐸)𝑀(1+|𝜆|)1with 𝜆𝑆𝜑,𝜑[0𝜋), where 𝐼 is the identity operator in 𝐸 and 𝐿(𝐸) is the space of bounded linear operators in 𝐸.

It is known [3, Section  1.15.1] that there exist the fractional powers 𝐴𝜃of the positive operator 𝐴. Let 𝐸(𝐴𝜃) denote the space 𝐷(𝐴𝜃) with a graph norm defined as𝑢𝐸(𝐴𝜃)=𝑢𝑝+𝐴𝜃𝑢𝑝1/𝑝,1𝑝<,<𝜃<.(2.7)

The operator 𝐴(𝑡) is said to be 𝜑-positive in 𝐸 uniformly with respect to 𝑡 with bound 𝑀>0 if 𝐷(𝐴(𝑡)) is independent of 𝑡, 𝐷(𝐴(𝑡)) is dense in 𝐸, and (𝐴(𝑡)+𝜆𝐼)1𝑀(1+|𝜆|)1 for all 𝜆𝑆𝜑, 0𝜑<𝜋,where 𝑀 does not depend on 𝑡 and 𝜆.

Let 𝑙=(𝑙1,𝑙2,,𝑙𝑛),𝑠=(𝑠1,𝑠2,,𝑠𝑛), where 𝑙𝑘 are positive integers. Let 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸) denote a 𝐸-valued weighted Sobolev-Besov space of functions 𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸) that have generalized derivatives 𝐷𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢=(𝜕𝑙𝑘/𝜕𝑥𝑙𝑘𝑘)𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸),𝑘=1,2,,𝑛, with the norm𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)=𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)+𝑛𝑘=1𝐷𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)<.(2.8)

Suppose 𝐸0 is continuously and densely embedded into 𝐸. Let 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸0,𝐸) denote the space with the norm𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾=𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸0,𝐸)=𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸0)+𝑛𝑘=1𝐷𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)<.(2.9)

Let 𝑡=(𝑡1,𝑡2,,𝑡𝑛), where 𝑡𝑘 are parameters. We define the following parameterized norm in 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃(Ω;𝐸0,𝐸):𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾,𝑡(Ω;𝐸0,𝐸)=𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸0)+𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐷𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)<.(2.10)

Let 𝑚 be a positive integer. 𝐶(𝑚)(Ω;𝐸) denotes the spaces of 𝐸-valued bounded and 𝑚-times continuously differentiable functions on Ω. For two sequences {𝑎𝑗}1 and {𝑏𝑗}1 of positive numbers, the expression 𝑎𝑗𝑏𝑗 means that there exist positive numbers 𝐶1 and 𝐶2 such that𝐶1𝑎𝑗𝑏𝑗𝐶2𝑎𝑗.(2.11)

Let 𝐸1,  and 𝐸2 be two Banach spaces. Let 𝐹 denote the Fourier transformation and let be some parameter. We say that the function Ψ dependent of is a uniform collection of multipliers if there exists a positive constant 𝑀 independent of such that 𝐹1Ψ𝐹𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸2)𝑀𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸1)for all 𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸1). The set of all multipliers from 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸1) to 𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸2) will be denoted by 𝑀𝑞,𝜃,𝛾𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝐸1,𝐸2). For 𝐸1=𝐸2=𝐸, it will be denoted by 𝑀𝑞,𝜃,𝛾𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝐸). The exposition of the theory of Fourier multipliers and some related references can be found in [3, Sections  2.2.1–2.2.4]. In weighted 𝐿𝑝 spaces, Fourier multipliers have been investigated in several studies like [27, 28]. Operator-valued Fourier multipliers in Banach-valued 𝐿𝑝 spaces studied, for example, in [4, 6, 25, 2733].

Let 𝛽=(𝛽1,𝛽2,,𝛽𝑛) be multi-indexes and𝜉𝛽=𝜉𝛽11𝜉𝛽22,,𝜉𝛽𝑛𝑛,𝑈𝑛=||𝛽||1𝛽𝑛,𝜂=𝑝1𝑞.(2.12)

Definition 2.1. A Banach space 𝐸 satisfies a 𝐵-multiplier condition with respect to 𝑝,𝑞,𝜃,𝑠 (or with respect to 𝑝,𝜃,𝑠 for 𝑝=𝑞), and the weight 𝛾, when Ψ𝐶𝑛(𝑅𝑛;𝐵(𝐸)), 1𝑝𝑞, 𝛽𝑈𝑛 and 𝜉𝑉𝑛, if the estimate (1+|𝜉|)|𝛽|+𝜂𝐷𝛽Ψ(𝜉)𝐿(𝐸)𝐶,𝑘=0,1,,|𝛽| implies Ψ𝑀𝑞,𝜃,𝛾𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝐸).
It is well known (e.g., see [32]) that any Hilbert space satisfies the 𝐵-multiplier condition. There are, however, Banach spaces which are not Hilbert spaces but satisfy the 𝐵-multiplier condition (see [7, 30]). However, additional conditions are needed for operator-valued multipliers in 𝐿𝑝 spaces, for example, UMD spaces (e.g., see [25, 33]). Let 𝛼1,𝛼2,,𝛼𝑛 be nonnegative and 𝑙1,𝑙2,,𝑙𝑛 positive integers: ||||=𝛼𝑙𝑛𝑘=1𝛼𝑘𝑙𝑘𝛼,𝛼=1,𝛼2,,𝛼𝑛𝑙,𝑙=1,𝑙2,,𝑙𝑛,𝐷𝛼=𝐷𝛼11𝐷𝛼22D𝛼𝑛𝑛=𝜕|𝛼|𝜕𝑥𝛼11𝜕𝑥𝛼22𝜕𝑥𝛼𝑛𝑛,|𝛼|=𝑛𝑘=!𝛼𝑘.(2.13)
Consider the following differential-operator equation: 𝐿𝑢=𝑛𝑘=1(1)𝑙𝑘𝑡𝑘𝐷2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢+𝐴𝜆𝑢+||||𝛼2𝑙<1𝛼(𝑡)𝐴𝛼(𝑥)𝐷𝛼𝑢=𝑓,(2.14) where 𝐴(𝑥), 𝐴𝛼(𝑥) are linear operators in a Banach space 𝐸,  𝑎𝑘 are complex-valued functions and 𝑡𝑘 are some parameters 𝛼(𝑡)=𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝛼𝑘/2𝑙𝑘𝑘. For 𝑙1=𝑙2==𝑙𝑛=𝑚, we obtain the elliptic class of DOE.
The function belonging to 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) and satisfying (2.14) a.e. on 𝑅𝑛 is said to be a solution of (2.14) on 𝑅𝑛.

Definition 2.2. The problem (2.14) is said to be uniform weighted 𝐵-separable (or weighted 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)-separable) if, for all 𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸), the problem (2.14) has a unique solution 𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) and the following estimate holds: 𝐴𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)+𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐷2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)𝐶𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸).(2.15)
Consider the following degenerate DOE: 𝐿𝑢=𝑛𝑘=1(1)𝑙𝑘𝑡𝑘𝐷[2𝑙𝑘]𝑘𝑢+𝐴𝜆𝑢+||||𝛼2𝑙<1𝛼(𝑡)𝐴𝛼(𝑥)𝐷[𝛼]𝑢=𝑓,(2.16) where 𝐴(𝑥), 𝐴𝛼(𝑥) are linear operators in a Banach space 𝐸,𝑎𝑘 are complex-valued functions, 𝑡𝑘 are some parameters and 𝐷𝑥[𝑖]𝑘=𝛾𝑥𝑘𝜕𝜕𝑥𝑘𝑖,𝑘=1,2,,𝑛.(2.17)

Remark 2.3. Under the substitution 𝜏𝑘=𝑥𝑘0𝛾1(𝑦)𝑑𝑦,(2.18)𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸),  𝐵[𝑙],𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) are mapped isomorphically onto the spaces 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,̃𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸),  𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,̃𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸), respectively, where 𝛾=𝑛𝑘=1𝛾𝑥𝑘,̃𝛾=̃𝛾(𝜏)=𝑛𝑘=1𝛾𝑥𝑘𝜏𝑘.(2.19) Moreover, under the substitution (2.18), the degenerate problem (2.16) is mapped to the undegenerate problem (2.14).

3. Embedding Theorems

Let𝜘=𝑛𝑘=1𝛼𝑘+1/𝑝1/𝑞𝑙𝑘,𝜈(𝑙)=max𝑘,𝑗{1,2,,𝑛}1𝑙𝑘1𝑙𝑗,𝜎(𝑡)=𝑛𝑘=1𝑡(𝛼𝑘+1/𝑝1/𝑞)/𝑙𝑘𝑘.(3.1)

Theorem 3.1. Suppose the following conditions hold:(1)𝐸 is a Banach space satisfying the 𝐵-multiplier condition with respect to 𝑝, 𝑞, 𝑠;(2)𝑡=(𝑡1,𝑡2,,𝑡𝑛),  0<𝑡𝑘𝑇<, 𝑘=1,2,,𝑛, 1<𝑝𝑞<, 𝜃[1,];(3)𝑙𝑘 are positive, 𝛼𝑘 nonnegative integers such that 0<𝜘+𝜈(𝑙)1 and 0𝜇1𝜘𝜈(𝑙);(4)𝐴 is a 𝜑-positive operator in 𝐸.
Then, the embedding 𝐷𝛼𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸)𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴1𝜘𝜇)) is continuous, and there exists a constant 𝐶𝜇>0, depending only on 𝜇 such that 𝜎(𝑡)𝐷𝛼𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴1𝜘𝜇))𝐶𝜇𝜇𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾,𝑡+(1𝜇)𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸)(3.2) for all 𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) and 0<0<.

Proof. Denoting 𝐹𝑢 by ̂𝑢, it is clear that 𝐷𝛼𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴1𝜘𝜇))𝐹1(𝑖𝜉)𝛼𝐴1𝜘𝜇̂𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸).(3.3) Similarly, from the definition of 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸), we have 𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾,𝑡(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸)=𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴))+𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐷𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸)𝐹1𝐴̂𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸)+𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐹1𝑖𝜉𝑘𝑙𝑘̂𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸).(3.4) Thus, proving the inequality (3.2) is equivalent to proving 𝐹𝜎(𝑡)1(𝑖𝜉)𝛼𝐴1𝜘𝜇̂𝑢𝑋𝑠𝜇𝐹1𝐴̂𝑢𝑋𝑠+𝜇𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐹1𝑖𝜉𝑘𝑙𝑘̂𝑢𝑋𝑠+(1𝜇)𝑢𝑋𝑠.(3.5) So, the inequality (3.2) will be followed if we prove the following inequality: 𝐹𝜎(𝑡)1(𝑖𝜉)𝛼𝐴1𝜘𝜇̂𝑢𝑋𝑠𝐶𝜇𝐹1𝜇(𝐴+𝜓(𝑡,𝜉))̂𝑢𝑋𝑠(3.6) for a suitable 𝐶𝜇>0 and for all 𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸), where 𝜓=𝜓(𝑡,𝜉)=𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘||𝜉𝑘||𝑙𝑘+1,𝑋𝑠=𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸).(3.7)
Let us express the left-hand side of (3.6) as 𝐹𝜎(𝑡)1(𝑖𝜉)𝛼𝐴1𝜘𝜇̂𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸)=𝐹𝜎(𝑡)1(𝑖𝜉)𝛼𝐴1𝜘𝜇𝜇(𝐴+𝜓)1𝜇(𝐴+𝜓)𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸).(3.8) (Since 𝐴 is a positive operator in 𝐸 and 𝜓(𝑡,𝜉)𝑆(𝜑), it is possible.) By virtue of Definition 2.1, it is clear that the inequality (3.6) will be followed immediately from (3.8) if we can prove that the operator-function Ψ𝑡=Ψ𝑡,,𝜇=𝜎(𝑡)(𝑖𝜉)𝛼𝐴1𝜘𝜇[𝜇(𝐴+𝜓)]1 is a multiplier in 𝑀𝑞,𝜃,𝛾𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝐸), which is uniform with respect to and 𝑡. Since 𝐸 satisfies the multiplier condition with respect to 𝑝 and 𝑞, it suffices to show the following estimate: ||𝜉||𝑘+𝜂𝐷𝛽Ψ𝑡(𝜉)𝐿(𝐸)||𝛽||𝐶,𝑘=0,1,,(3.9) for all 𝛽𝑈𝑛, 𝜉𝑅𝑛/{𝜉𝑘=0} and 𝜂=1/𝑝1/𝑞. In a way similar to [18,Lemma  3.1], we obtain that |𝜉|𝜂Ψ𝑡(𝜉)𝐿(𝐸)𝑀𝜇for all 𝜉𝑅𝑛. This shows that the inequality (3.9) is satisfied for 𝛽=(0,,0). We next consider (3.9) for 𝛽=(𝛽1,,𝛽𝑛), where 𝛽𝑘=1 and 𝛽=0 for 𝑗𝑘. By using the condition 𝜘+𝜈(𝑙)1 and well-known inequality 𝑦𝛼11𝑦𝛼22𝑦𝛼𝑛𝑛𝐶(1+𝑛𝑘=1𝑦𝑙𝑘𝑘),𝑦𝑘0 and by reasoning according to [18, Theorem  3.1], we have ||𝜉||1+𝜂||𝜉𝑘||𝐷𝑘Ψ𝑡(𝜉)𝐿(𝐸)𝑀𝜇,𝑘=1,2,,𝑛.(3.10)
Repeating the above process, we obtain the estimate (3.9). Thus, the operator-function Ψ𝑡,,𝜇(𝜉) is a uniform collection of multiplier, that is, Ψ𝑡,,𝜇Φ𝑀𝑞,𝜃,𝛾𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝐸). This completes the proof of the Theorem 3.1.

It is possible to state Theorem 3.1 in a more general setting. For this, we use the extension operator in 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸).

Condition 1. Let 𝐴 be a 𝜑-positive operator in Banach spaces 𝐸 satisfying the 𝐵-multiplier condition. Let a region Ω𝑅𝑛 be such that there exists a bounded linear extension operatorfrom 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) to 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸), for 1𝑝,  𝜃.

Remark 3.2. If Ω𝑅𝑛 is a region satisfying a strong 𝑙-horn condition (see [23, Section  18]) 𝐸=𝑅,𝐴=𝐼, then there exists a bounded linear extension operator from 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω)=𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝑅,𝑅) to 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛)=𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝑅,𝑅).

Theorem 3.3. Suppose all conditions of Theorem 3.1 and Condition 1 are satisfied. Then, the embedding 𝐷𝛼𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸)𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴1𝜘𝜇)) is continuous and there exists a constant 𝐶𝜇 depending only on 𝜇 such that 𝜎(𝑡)𝐷𝛼𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴1𝜘𝜇))𝐶𝜇𝜇𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾,𝑡+(1𝜇)𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)(3.11) for all 𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) and 0<0<.

Proof. It suffices to prove the estimate (3.11). Let 𝑃 be a bounded linear extension operator from 𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸) to 𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸) and also from 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) to 𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸). Let 𝑃Ω be a restriction operator from 𝑅𝑛 to Ω. Then, for any 𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸), we have 𝐷𝛼𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴1𝜘𝜇))=𝐷𝛼𝑃Ω𝑃𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴1𝜘𝜇))𝐶𝜇𝜇𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸)+(1𝜇)𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸).(3.12)

Result 1. Let all conditions of Theorem 3.3 hold. Then, for all 𝑢𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) we get 𝐷𝛼𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴1𝜘𝜇))𝐶𝜇𝑢𝐵1𝜇𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸)𝑢𝜇𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸).(3.13) Indeed, setting =𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸)𝑢𝐵1𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) in (3.13), we obtain (3.11).

Result 2. If 𝑙1=𝑙2==𝑙𝑛=𝑚 and 𝑠1=𝑠2==𝑠𝑛=𝜎, then we obtain that embedding 𝐷𝛼𝐵𝑚,𝜎𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸)𝐵𝜎𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(Ω;𝐸(𝐴1𝜘)) for 𝜘=|𝛼|/𝑚 and the corresponding estimate (3.11). For 𝐸=𝐂,  𝐴=𝐼, we obtain the embedding of weighted Besov spaces 𝐷𝛼𝐵𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(Ω)𝐵𝑠𝑞,𝜃,𝛾(Ω).

4. Application to Vector-Valued Functions

Let 𝑠>0, and consider the space [3,Section  1.18.2]𝑙𝜎𝑞=𝑢𝑢;𝑢=𝑖1,𝑢𝑖𝐶,𝑢𝑙𝜎𝑞=𝑖=12𝑖𝑞𝜎||𝑢𝑖||𝑞1/𝑞<.(4.1)

Note that 𝑙0𝑞=𝑙𝑞. Let 𝐴 be an infinite matrix defined in 𝑙𝑞 such that 𝐷(𝐴)=𝑙𝜎𝑞,𝐴=[𝛿𝑖𝑗2𝜎𝑖],where 𝛿𝑖𝑗=0, when 𝑖𝑗,𝛿𝑖𝑗=1, when 𝑖=𝑗,  𝑖, 𝑗=1,2,,. It is clear to see that 𝐴 is positive in 𝑙𝑞. Then, by Theorem 3.3, we obtain the embedding𝐷𝛼𝐵𝑝𝑙,𝑠1,𝜃,𝛾Ω;𝑙𝜎𝑞,𝑙𝑞𝐵𝑠𝑝2,𝜃,𝛾Ω;𝑙𝑞𝜎(1𝜘𝜇),𝜘=𝑛𝑘=1𝛼𝑘+1/𝑝11/𝑝2𝑙𝑘,(4.2) and the corresponding estimate (3.11), where 0𝜇+𝜈(𝑙)1𝜘.

It should be noted that the above embedding has not been obtained with classical methods up to this time.

5. 𝐵-Separable DOE in 𝑅𝑛 with Parameters

Let us consider the differential-operator equation (2.14). Let𝑋𝑠=𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸),𝑌𝑠=𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅𝑛;𝐸).(5.1)

Theorem 5.1. Suppose the following conditions hold:
(1)𝑠𝑘>0, 1<𝑝<,1𝜃<, 𝑡𝑘>0, 𝑘=1,2,,𝑛; (2)𝐸 is a Banach space satisfying the 𝐵-multiplier condition;(3)𝐴 is a 𝜑-positive operator in 𝐸 and𝐴𝛼(𝑥)𝐴(1|𝛼2𝑙|𝜇)𝐿(𝑅𝑛||||.;𝐿(𝐸)),0<𝜇<1𝛼2𝑙(5.2)

Then, for all 𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸) and for sufficiently large |𝜆|>0, 𝜆𝑆(𝜑), the equation (2.18) has a unique solution 𝑢(𝑥) that belongs to space 𝐵2𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) and the following uniform coercive estimate holds:𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐷2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸)+𝐴𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸)𝐶𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸).(5.3)

Proof. At first, we will consider the principal part of (2.14), that is, the differential-operator equation 𝐿0+𝜆𝑢=𝑛𝑘=1(1)𝑙𝑘𝑡𝑘𝐷2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢+(𝐴+𝜆)𝑢=𝑓.(5.4) Then, by applying the Fourier transform to (5.4), we obtain 𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝜉2𝑙𝑘𝑘̂𝑢(𝜉)+(𝐴+𝜆)̂𝑢(𝜉)=𝑓̂(𝜉).(5.5)
Since 𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝜉2𝑙𝑘𝑘0 for all 𝜉=(𝜉1,,𝜉𝑛)𝑅𝑛, we can say that 𝜔=𝜔(𝑡,𝜆,𝜉)=𝜆+𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝜉2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑆(𝜑) for all 𝜉𝑅𝑛, that is, operator 𝐴+𝜔 is invertible in 𝐸. Hence, (5.5) implies that the solution of (5.4) can be represented in the form 𝑢(𝑥)=𝐹1(𝐴+𝜔)1𝑓̂. It is clear to see that the operator-function𝜑𝜆,𝑡(𝜉)=[𝐴+𝜔]1 is a multiplier in 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸) uniformly with respect to 𝜆𝑆(𝜑). Actually, by definition of the positive operator, for all 𝜉𝑅𝑛 and𝜆0, we get 𝜑𝜆(𝜉)𝐿(𝐸)=(𝐴+𝜔)1𝑀(1+|𝜔|)1𝑀0.(5.6) Moreover, since 𝐷𝑘𝜑𝜆,𝑡(𝜉)=2𝑙𝑘𝑡𝑘(𝐴+𝜔)2𝜉2𝑙𝑘𝑘1, then 𝜉𝑘𝐷𝑘𝜑𝜆,𝑡𝐿(𝐸)𝑀. By using this estimate for 𝛽𝑈𝑛, we get ||𝜉||𝛽𝐷𝛽𝜉𝜑𝜆,𝑡(𝜉)𝐿(𝐸)𝐶.(5.7) In a similar way to Theorem 3.1, we prove that 𝜑𝑘,𝜆,𝑡(𝜉)=𝜉2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝜑𝜆,𝑡,  𝑘=1,2,,𝑛, and 𝜑0,𝜆,𝑡=𝐴𝜑𝜆,𝑡 satisfy the estimates ||𝜉||1+|𝛽|𝐷𝛽𝜉𝜑𝑘,𝜆,𝑡(𝜉)𝐿(𝐸)||𝜉||𝐶,1+|𝛽|𝐷𝛽𝜉𝜑0,𝜆,𝑡(𝜉)𝐿(𝐸)𝐶.(5.8) Since the space 𝐸 satisfies the multiplier condition with respect to 𝑝, then, in view of estimates (5.7) and (5.8), we obtain that the operator-functions 𝜑𝜆,𝑡,𝜑𝑘,𝜆,𝑡,𝜑0,𝜆,𝑡 are multipliers in 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸). Then, we obtain that there exists a unique solution of (5.4) for 𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸) and the following estimate holds: 𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐷2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾+𝐴𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾𝐶𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾.(5.9) Consider now the differential operator 𝐺0𝑡 generated by problem (5.4), that is, 𝐷𝐺0𝑡=𝐵2𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸),𝐺0𝑡𝑢=𝑛𝑘=1(1)𝑙𝑘𝑡𝑘𝐷2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢+𝐴𝑢.(5.10) The estimate (5.9) implies that the operator 𝐺0𝑡+𝜘 has a bounded inverse from 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸) into 𝐵2𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) for all 𝜘0. Let 𝐺𝑡 denote the differential operator in 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸) generated by problem (2.14). In view of (2.18) condition, by virtue of Theorem 3.1, for all 𝑢𝐵2𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸), we have 𝐿1𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾||||𝛼2𝑙<1𝐴𝛼(𝑡)1|𝛼2𝑙|𝜇𝐷𝛼𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾𝐶𝜇𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐷2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾+𝐴𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾+(1𝜇)𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾.(5.11) Then, from (5.11), we have 𝐿1𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾𝐶𝜇(𝐺0𝑡+𝜆)𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾+(1𝜇)𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾.(5.12) Since 𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾=(1/𝜆)(𝐺0𝑡+𝜆)𝑢𝐺0𝑡𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾 for all 𝑢𝐵2𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸), we get 𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾1||𝜆||𝐺0𝑡𝑢+𝜆𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾+𝐺0𝑡𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾.(5.13) From estimates (5.11)–(5.13), we obtain 𝐿1𝑢𝑋𝑠𝐶𝜇𝐺0𝑡𝑢+𝜆𝑋𝑠+𝐶1||𝜆||1(1𝜇)𝐺0𝑡𝑢+𝜆𝑋𝑠.(5.14) Then, by choosing and 𝜆, such that 𝐶𝜇<1,𝐶1|𝜆|1(1𝜇)<1 from (5.14), we get the following uniform estimate: 𝐿1𝐺0𝑡+𝜆1𝐿(𝐸)<1.(5.15) Then, using the estimates of (5.9), (5.15) and the perturbation theory of linear operators, we obtain that the operator 𝐺𝑡+𝜆 is invertible from 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛,𝐸) into 𝐵2𝑙,𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸). This implies the estimate (5.3).

Result 1. Let all conditions of Theorem 5.1 hold. Then,(1)for𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅𝑛,𝐸),  𝜆𝑆(𝜑), (2.16) has a unique solution 𝑢𝐵[2𝑙],𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝐸(𝐴),𝐸) and 𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐷[2𝑙𝑘]𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅𝑛;𝐸)+𝐴𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅𝑛;𝐸)𝐶𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅𝑛;𝐸),(5.16)(2)the operator 𝑄𝑡 has a resolvent (𝑄𝑡+𝜆)1 for |arg𝜆|𝜑, and the following uniform estimate holds: ||||𝛼2𝑙1||𝜆||𝛼(𝑡)1|𝛼2𝑙|𝐷[𝛼]𝑄𝑡+𝜆1𝐿(𝑌𝑠)+𝐴𝑄𝑡+𝜆1𝐿(𝑌𝑠)𝐶.(5.17)

Remark 5.2. Result 1 implies that operator 𝑄𝑡 is uniformly positive in 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅𝑛;𝐸). Then, by virtue of [3, Section  1.14.5], the operator 𝑄𝑡 is a generator of an analytic semigroup in 𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅𝑛;𝐸).

6. Cauchy Problem for Degenerate Parabolic DOE with Parameters

Consider the Cauchy problem for the degenerate parabolic DOE𝜕𝑢+𝜕𝑦𝑛𝑘=1(1)𝑙𝑘𝑡𝑘𝐷[2𝑙𝑘]𝑘𝑢+𝐴𝑢+||||𝛼2𝑙<1𝛼(𝑡)𝐴𝛼(𝑥)𝐷[𝛼]𝑢=𝑓(𝑦,𝑥),𝑢(0,𝑥)=0,(6.1) where 𝐴 and 𝐴𝛼(𝑥) are linear operators in a Banach space in 𝐸. Let 𝐹=𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅𝑛;𝐸).

Theorem 6.1. Assume all conditions of Theorem 5.1 hold for 𝜑(𝜋/2,𝜋) and 𝑠>0. Then, for 𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+;𝐹), (6.1) has a unique solution 𝑢𝐵1𝑝,𝑞(𝑅+;𝐷(𝑄𝑡),𝐹) satisfying 𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+;𝐹)+𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐷[2𝑙𝑘]𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+;𝐹)+𝐴𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+;𝐹)𝐶𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+;𝐹).(6.2)

Proof. The problem (6.1) can be expressed as 𝑑𝑢𝑑𝑦+𝑄𝑡𝑢(𝑦)=𝑓(𝑦),𝑢(0)=0,𝑦(0,).(6.3)
Result 1 implies the uniform positivity of 𝐺𝑡. So, by [6, Application D], we obtain that, for 𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+;𝐹), the Cauchy problem (6.3) has a unique solution 𝑢𝐵1+𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+;𝐷(𝑄𝑡),𝐹) satisfying 𝐷𝑡𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+;𝐹)+𝑄𝑡𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+;𝐹)𝐶𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝑞(𝑅+;𝐹).(6.4)
In view of Result 1, the operator 𝑄𝑡 is uniform separable in 𝐹; therefore, the estimate (6.4) implies (6.2).

7. Infinite Systems of the Quasielliptic Equation

Consider the following infinity systems:(𝐿+𝜆)𝑢𝑚=𝑛𝑘=1(1)𝑙𝑘𝑡𝑘𝐷2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝑚𝑑(𝑥)+𝑚𝑢+𝜆𝑚(𝑥)+||||𝛼𝑙<1𝛼(𝑡)𝑘=1𝑑𝛼𝑘𝑚(𝑥)𝐷𝛼𝑢𝑚=𝑓𝑚(𝑥),𝑥𝑅𝑛,𝑚=1,2,,.(7.1)

Let 𝑑𝑑(𝑥)=𝑚(𝑥),𝑑𝑚𝑢>0,𝑢=𝑚𝑑,𝑑𝑢=𝑚𝑢𝑚,𝑑𝑄(𝑥)=𝑚(𝑥),𝑑𝑚𝑢>0,𝑢=𝑚𝑑,𝑄𝑢=𝑚𝑢𝑚,𝑙𝑞(𝑄)==𝑢𝑢𝑙𝑞,𝑢𝑙𝑞(𝑄)=𝑄𝑢𝑙𝑞=𝑚=1||𝑑𝑚𝑢𝑚||𝑞1/𝑞,<(7.2) and let 𝑡𝑘 be positive parameters. Let 𝑂𝑡 denote the differential operator in 𝐵=𝐿(𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝑙𝑞)) generated by problem (7.1).

Theorem 7.1. Let 𝑎𝛼𝐶𝑏(𝑅𝑛), 𝑑𝑚𝐶𝑏(𝑅𝑛),  𝑑𝛼𝑘𝑚𝐿(𝑅𝑛) such that max𝛼sup𝑚𝑘=1𝑑𝛼𝑘𝑚(𝑥)𝑑𝑘(1|𝛼𝑙|𝜇)<𝑀 for all 𝑥𝑅𝑛,  𝑝, 𝑞(1,),  𝜃[1,] and 0<𝜇<1|𝛼𝑙|.
Then,(a)for all 𝑓(𝑥)={𝑓𝑚(𝑥)}1𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝑙𝑞), for |arg𝜆|𝜑 and for sufficiently large |𝜆|, the problem (7.1) has a unique solution 𝑢={𝑢𝑚(𝑥)}1 that belongs to space 𝐵𝑠+2𝑙𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛,𝑙𝑞(𝑑),𝑙𝑞) and the uniform coercive estimate holds ||||𝛼2𝑙1𝐷𝛼𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝑙𝑞)+𝑄𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝑙𝑞)𝐶𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝑙𝑞),(7.3)(b)for |arg𝜆|𝜑 and for sufficiently large |𝜆|, there exists a resolvent (𝑂𝑡+𝜆)1 of operator 𝑂𝑡 and ||||𝛼2𝑙1||𝜆||𝛼(𝑡)1|𝛼𝑙|𝐷𝛼𝑂𝑡+𝜆1𝐵+𝑄𝑂𝑡+𝜆1𝐵𝑀.(7.4)

Proof. Really, let 𝐸=𝑙𝑞,  𝐴(𝑥), and let 𝐴𝛼(𝑥) be infinite matrices such that 𝑑𝐴=𝑚(𝑥)𝛿𝑘𝑚,𝐴𝛼𝑑(𝑥)=𝛼𝑘𝑚(𝑥),𝑘,𝑚=1,2,,.(7.5) It is clear that the operator 𝐴 is positive in 𝑙𝑞. Therefore, from Theorem 6.1, we obtain that the problem (7.1) has a unique solution 𝑢𝐵𝑠+2𝑙𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝑙𝑞(𝑄),𝑙𝑞) for all 𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝑙𝑞), |arg𝜆|𝜑, sufficiently large |𝜆| and estimate (7.3) holds. From estimate (7.3), we obtain (7.4).

8. Cauchy Problem for Infinite Systems of Parabolic Equations

Consider the following infinity systems of parabolic Cauchy problem𝜕𝑢𝑚+𝜕𝑦𝑛𝑘=1(1)𝑙𝑘𝑡𝑘𝐷2𝑙𝑘𝑘𝑢𝑚+𝑑𝑚(𝑥)𝑢𝑚+||||𝛼𝑙<1𝛼(𝑡)𝑑𝛼𝑘𝑚(𝑥)𝐷𝛼𝑢𝑚=𝑓𝑚(𝑦,𝑥),𝑦𝑅+,𝑥𝑅𝑛,𝑢𝑚(0,𝑥)=0,𝑚=1,2,,.(8.1)

Theorem 8.1. Let all conditions of Theorem 7.1 hold. Then, the parabolic systems (8.1) for sufficiently large 𝜘>0 have a unique solution 𝑢𝐵1,𝑠+2𝑙𝑝,𝜃,𝛾(𝑅𝑛;𝑙𝑞(𝑄),𝑙𝑞), and the following estimate holds: 𝜕𝑢𝜕𝑦𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+𝑛+1;𝑙𝑞)+𝑛𝑘=1𝑡𝑘𝐷[2𝑙𝑘]𝑘𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+𝑛+1;𝑙𝑞)+𝑄𝑢𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+𝑛+1;𝑙𝑞)𝐶𝑓𝐵𝑠𝑝,𝜃(𝑅+𝑛+1;𝑙𝑞).(8.2)

Proof. Really, let 𝐸=𝑙𝑞,  and let 𝐴 and 𝐴𝛼(𝑥) be infinite matrices, such that 𝑑𝐴=𝑚(𝑥)𝛿𝑘𝑚,𝐴𝛼𝑑(𝑥)=𝛼𝑘𝑚(𝑥),𝑘,𝑚=1,2,.(8.3)
Then, the problem (8.1) can be expressed in the form (6.3), where 𝑑𝐴=𝑚(𝑥)𝛿𝑘𝑚,𝐴𝛼𝑑(𝑥)=𝛼𝑘𝑚(𝑥),𝑘,𝑚=1,2,.(8.4) Then, by virtue of Theorems 6.1 and 7.1, we obtain the assertion.

Acknowledgment

The author would like to express gratitude to proofreader Amy Spangler for her useful advice while preparing this paper.