Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Function Spaces
Volume 2015 (2015), Article ID 245436, 5 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/245436
Research Article

The Randomized American Option as a Classical Solution to the Penalized Problem

American University of Sharjah, P.O. Box 26666, Sharjah, UAE

Received 13 August 2015; Accepted 7 October 2015

Academic Editor: Hugo Leiva

Copyright © 2015 Guillaume Leduc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. P. Carr, “Deriving derivatives of derivative securities,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/IAFE/INFORMS Conference on Computational Intelligence for Financial Engineering (CIFEr '00), pp. 101–128, IEEE, New York, NY, USA, March 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. M. Broadie and J. B. Detemple, “ANNIVERSARY ARTICLE: option pricing: valuation models and applications,” Management Science, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 1145–1177, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. S.-R. Ahn, H.-O. Bae, H.-K. Koo, and K.-J. Lee, “A survey on american options: old approaches and new trends,” Bulletin of the Korean Mathematical Society, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 791–812, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S.-P. Zhu, “On various quantitative approaches for pricing american options,” New Mathematics and Natural Computation, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 313–332, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. S. D. Howison, C. Reisinger, and J. H. Witte, “The effect of nonsmooth payoffs on the penalty approximation of american options,” SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 539–574, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. P. A. Forsyth and K. R. Vetzal, “Quadratic convergence for valuing American options using a penalty method,” SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 2095–2122, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. F. Nielsen, O. Skavhaug, and A. Tveito, “Penalty and front-fixing methods for the numerical solution of american option problems,” Journal of Computational Finance, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 69–98, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Q. M. Khaliq, D. A. Voss, and S. H. K. Kazmi, “A linearly implicit predictor-corrector scheme for pricing American options using a penalty method approach,” Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 489–502, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. S. Wang, X. Q. Yang, and K. L. Teo, “Power penalty method for a linear complementarity problem arising from American option valuation,” Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 227–254, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. J. Liang, B. Hu, L. Jiang, and B. Bian, “On the rate of convergence of the binomial tree scheme for American options,” Numerische Mathematik, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 333–352, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. B. Hu, J. Liang, and L. Jiang, “Optimal convergence rate of the explicit finite difference scheme for American option valuation,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, vol. 230, no. 2, pp. 583–599, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Christara and D. M. Dang, “Adaptive and high-order methods for valuing american options,” Journal of Computational Finance, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 73–113, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  13. Z. Cen, A. Le, and A. Xu, “A second-order difference scheme for the penalized black–scholes equation governing american put option pricing,” Computational Economics, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 49–62, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Memon, “Finite element method for American option pricing: a penalty approach,” International Journal of Numerical Analysis and Modelling, Series B: Computing and Information, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 345–370, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  15. G. Leduc, “Exercisability randomization of the American option,” Stochastic Analysis and Applications, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 832–855, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH · View at Scopus
  16. D. Lamberton, “Error estimates for the binomial approximation of American put options,” Annals of Applied Probability, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 206–233, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. D. Lamberton, “Brownian optimal stopping and random walks,” Applied Mathematics and Optimization, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 283–324, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. Lamberton, Optimal Stopping and American Options, Summer School on Financial Mathematics, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2009.
  19. P. Dupuis and H. Wang, “Optimal stopping with random intervention times,” Advances in Applied Probability, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 141–157, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. X. Guo and J. Liu, “Stopping at the maximum of geometric Brownian motion when signals are received,” Journal of Applied Probability, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 826–838, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. P. Carr, “Randomization and the American put,” Review of Financial Studies, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 597–626, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. Leduc, “A European option general first-order error formula,” The ANZIAM Journal, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 248–272, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus