Table of Contents
Journal of Geological Research
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 327037, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/327037
Research Article

A Fast Interpretation Method for Inverse Modeling of Residual Gravity Anomalies Caused by Simple Geometry

Geophysics Department, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, P.O. 12613, Giza, Egypt

Received 10 August 2011; Revised 24 November 2011; Accepted 16 December 2011

Academic Editor: Steven L. Forman

Copyright © 2012 Khalid S. Essa. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Chakravarthi and N. Sundararajan, “Ridge-regression algorithm for gravity inversion of fault structures with variable density,” Geophysics, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 1394–1404, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. S. M. Abdelrahman and T. M. El-Araby, “A least-squares minimization approach to depth determination from moving average residual gravity anomalies,” Geophysics, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 1779–1784, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. L. L. Nettleton, “Gravity and magnetic calculation,” Geophysics, vol. 7, pp. 293–310, 1942. View at Google Scholar
  4. W. M. Telford, L. P. Geldart, R. E. Sheriff, and D. A. Key, Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press, London, UK, 1976.
  5. L. L. Nettleton, Gravity and Magnetic in Oil Prospecting, McGraw-Hill Book, 1976.
  6. O. P. Gupta, “A least-squares approach to depth determination from gravity data,” Geophysics, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 357–360, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. E. M. Abdelrahman, “Discussion on: a least-squares approach to depth determination from gravity data by O. P. Gupta,” Geophysics, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 376–378, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  8. Y. Li and D. W. Oldenburg, “3-D inversion of gravity data,” Geophysics, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 109–119, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. X. Li and M. Chouteau, “Three-dimensional gravity modeling in all space,” Surveys in Geophysics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 339–368, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. O. Boulanger and M. Chouteau, “Constraints in 3D gravity inversion,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 265–280, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. S. Essa, “A simple formula for shape and depth determination from residual gravity anomalies,” Acta Geophysica, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 182–190, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. J. Asfahani and M. Tlas, “An automatic method of direct interpretation of residual gravity anomaly profiles due to spheres and cylinders,” Pure and Applied Geophysics, vol. 165, no. 5, pp. 981–994, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. Y. Li and D. W. Oldenburg, “3-D inversion of magnetic data,” Geophysics, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 394–408, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. E. M. Abdelrahman, S. Riad, E. Refai, and Y. Amin, “On the least-squares residual anomaly determinations,” Geophysics, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 473–480, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. B. N. P. Agarwal and C. Sivaji, “Separation of regional and residual anomalies by least-squares orthogonal polynomial and relaxation techniques: a performance evaluation,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 40, no. 2, pp. 143–156, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. S. Essa, “Gravity data interpretation using the s-curves method,” Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 204–213, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. E. M. Abdelrahman, A. I. Bayoumi, Y. E. Abdelhady, M. M. Gobashy, and H. M. El-Araby, “Gravity interpretation using correlation factors between successive least-squares residual anomalies,” Geophysics, vol. 54, no. 12, pp. 1614–1621, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. E. S. M. Abdelrahman and H. M. El-Araby, “Shape and depth solutions from gravity data using correlation factors between successive least-squares residuals,” Geophysics, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 1785–1791, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teukolsky, and W. T. Vetterling, Numerical Recipes, The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, 1986.
  20. F. S. Grant and G. F. West, Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics, McGraw-Hill Book, 1965.
  21. L. Roy, B. N. P. Agarwal, and R. K. Shaw, “A new concept in Euler deconvolution of isolated gravity anomalies,” Geophysical Prospecting, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 559–575, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus