Table of Contents
Journal of Gravity
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 549824, 28 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/549824
Review Article

Spin Foam Models with Finite Groups

1DAMTP, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
2MPI for Gravitational Physics, Albert Einstein Institute, Am Mühlenberg 1, 14476 Potsdam, Germany

Received 30 March 2013; Accepted 3 June 2013

Academic Editor: Kazuharu Bamba

Copyright © 2013 Benjamin Bahr et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. P. Reisenberger, “World sheet formulations of gauge theories and gravity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9412035.
  2. J. Iwasaki, “A Definition of the Ponzano-Regge quantum gravity model in terms of surfaces,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 36, no. 11, p. 6288, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. M. P. Reisenberger and C. Rovelli, “Sum over surfaces form of loop quantum gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 3490–3508, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Reisenberger and C. Rovelli, “Spin foams as Feynman diagrams,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0002083.
  5. M. P. Reisenberger and C. Rovelli, “Space-time as a Feynman diagram: the connection formulation,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 121–140, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. C. Baez, “Spin foam models,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 1827, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. A. Perez, “Spin foam models for quantum gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 20, no. 6, p. R43, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. A. Perez, “Introduction to loop quantum gravity and spin foams,” http://arxiv.org/abs/grqc/0409061.
  9. R. Loll, “Discrete approaches to quantum gravity in four dimensions,” Living Reviews in Relativity, vol. 1, p. 13, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. F. J. Wegner, “Duality in generalized Ising models and phase transitions without local order parameters,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 2259–2272, 1971. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Rovelli, Quantum Gravity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
  12. T. Thiemann, Modern Canonical Quantum General Relativity, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2005.
  13. J. Ambjorn, “Quantum gravity represented as dynamical triangulations,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 2079, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. Ambjorn, D. Boulatov, J. L. Nielsen, J. Rolf, and Y. Watabiki, “The spectral dimension of 2D quantum gravity,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 02, p. 010, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Ambjorn, B. Durhuus, and T. Jonsson, Quantum Geometry. A Statistical Field Theory Approach, Cambridge Monographs in Mathematical Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1997.
  16. J. Ambjorn, J. Jurkiewicz, and R. Loll, “The universe from scratch,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 103–117, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. J. Ambjorn, A. Gorlich, J. Jurkiewicz, R. Loll, J. Gizbert-Studnicki, and T. Trzesniewski, “The semiclassical limit of causal dynamical triangulations,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 849, no. 1, pp. 144–165, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. R. Gurau and J. P. Ryan, “Colored tensor models-a review,” SIGMA, vol. 8, article 020, 78 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. D. Oriti, “The Group field theory approach to quantum gravity,” in Approaches to Quantum Gravity, D. Oriti, Ed., pp. 310–331, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  20. D. Oriti, “Group field theory as the microscopic description of the quantum spacetime fluid: a new perspective on the continuum in quantum gravity,” PoS QG, p. 030, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  21. L. Freidel, “Group field theory: an Overview,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 44, no. 10, pp. 1769–1783, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. T. Krajewski, J. Magnen, V. Rivasseau, A. Tanasa, and P. Vitale, “Quantum corrections in the group field theory formulation of the Engle-Pereira-Rovelli-Livine and Freidel-Krasnov models,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 12, Article ID 124069, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. B. Geloun, R. Gurau, and V. Rivasseau, “EPRL/FK group field theory,” EPL, vol. 92, no. 6, Article ID 60008, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. E. R. Livine and D. Oriti, “Coupling of spacetime atoms and spin foam renormalisation from group field theory,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 0702, p. 092, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. A. Baratin and D. Oriti, “Quantum simplicial geometry in the group field theory formalism: reconsidering the Barrett-Crane model,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, Article ID 125011, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Baratin and D. Oriti, “Group field theory and simplicial gravity path integrals: a model for Holst-Plebanski gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 4, Article ID 044003, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. T. Konopka, F. Markopoulou, and L. Smolin, “Quantum graphity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0611197.
  28. T. Konopka, F. Markopoulou, and S. Severini, “Quantum graphity: a model of emergent locality,” Physical Review D, vol. 77, no. 10, Article ID 104029, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. D. Benedetti and J. Henson, “Imposing causality on a matrix model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 678, no. 2, pp. 222–226, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. B. Dittrich and R. Loll, “A hexagon model for 3D Lorentzian quantum cosmology,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 8, Article ID 084016, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  31. B. Dittrich and R. Loll, “Counting a black hole in Lorentzian product triangulations,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 11, Article ID 3849, pp. 3849–3878, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  32. D. Benedetti, R. Loll, and F. Zamponi, “(2+1)-dimensional quantum gravity as the continuum limit of causal dynamical triangulations,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 10, Article ID 104022, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  33. P. Hasenfratz and F. Niedermayer, “Perfect lattice action for asymptotically free theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 414, no. 3, pp. 785–814, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  34. P. Hasenfratz, “Prospects for perfect actions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 63, no. 1–3, pp. 53–58, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  35. W. Bietenholz, “Perfect scalars on the lattice,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 15, no. 21, p. 3341, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  36. B. Bahr and B. Dittrich, “Improved and perfect actions in discrete gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 12, Article ID 124030, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. B. Bahr and B. Dittrich, “Breaking and restoring of diffeomorphism symmetry in discrete gravity,” in Proceedings of the 25th Max Born Symposium on the Planck Scale, pp. 10–17, July 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. B. Bahr, B. Dittrich, and S. Steinhaus, “Perfect discretization of reparametrization invariant path integrals,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 10, Article ID 105026, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. B. Dittrich, “Diffeomorphism symmetry in quantum gravity models,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0810.3594.
  40. B. Bahr and B. Dittrich, “(Broken) Gauge symmetries and constraints in Regge calculus,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, no. 22, Article ID 225011, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. B. Dittrich and P. A. Hoehn, “From covariant to canonical formulations of discrete gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 27, no. 15, Article ID 155001, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  42. M. Rocek and R. M. Williams, “Quantum Regge Calculus,” Physics Letters B, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 31–37, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. M. Rocek and R. M. Williams, “The Quantization Of Regge Calculus,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 371–381, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. P. A. Morse, “Approximate diffeomorphism invariance in near at simplicial geometries,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 9, no. 11, p. 2489, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  45. H. W. Hamber and R. M. Williams, “Gauge invariance in simplicial gravity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 487, no. 1-2, pp. 345–408, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  46. B. Dittrich, L. Freidel, and S. Speziale, “Linearized dynamics from the 4-simplex Regge action,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 10, Article ID 104020, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  47. T. Regge, “General relativity without coordinates,” Il Nuovo Cimento, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 558–571, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  48. T. Regge and R. M. Williams, “Discrete structures in gravity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 41, no. 6, p. 3964, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. L. Freidel and D. Louapre, “Diffeomorphisms and spin foam models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 662, no. 1-2, pp. 279–298, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. G. T. Horowitz, “Exactly soluble diffeomorphism invariant theories,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 417–437, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. Dijkgraaf and E. Witten, “Topological gauge theories and group cohomology,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 129, no. 2, pp. 393–429, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. M. de Wild Propitius and F. A. Bais, “Discrete gauge theories,” in Banff 1994, Particles and Fields, pp. 353–439, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  53. M. Mackaay, “Finite groups, spherical 2-categories, and 4-manifold invariants,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 153, no. 2, pp. 353–390, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. A. Y. Kitaev, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons,” Annals of Physics, vol. 303, no. 1, pp. 2–30, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. M. A. Levin and X. -G. Wen, “String-net condensation: a physical mechanism for topological phases,” Physical Review B, vol. 71, no. 4, Article ID 045110, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. J. F. Plebański, “On the separation of Einsteinian substructures,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 18, no. 12, pp. 2511–2520, 1976. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. W. Barrett and L. Crane, “Relativistic spin networks and quantum gravity,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 39, no. 6, Article ID 3296, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  58. J. Engle, R. Pereira, and C. Rovelli, “The loop-quantum-gravity vertex-amplitude,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 16, Article ID 161301, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. J. Engle, E. Livine, R. Pereira, and C. Rovelli, “LQG vertex with finite Immirzi parameter,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 799, no. 1-2, pp. 136–149, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. E. R. Livine and S. Speziale, “A new spinfoam vertex for quantum gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 8, Article ID 084028, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  61. L. Freidel and K. Krasnov, “A new spin foam model for 4d gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, no. 12, Article ID 125018, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  62. S. Alexandrov, “Simplicity and closure constraints in spin foam models of gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 4, Article ID 044033, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  63. S. Alexandrov, “The new vertices and canonical quantization,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 2, Article ID 024024, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  64. B. Dittrich and J. P. Ryan, “Simplicity in simplicial phase space,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, Article ID 064026, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  65. R. Oeckl, “Generalized lattice gauge theory, spin foams and state sum invariants,” Journal of Geometry and Physics, vol. 46, no. 3-4, pp. 308–354, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. R. Oeckl, Discrete Gauge Theory: From Lattices to Tqft, Imperial College, London, UK, 2005.
  67. J. W. Barrett, R. J. Dowdall, W. J. Fairbairn, H. Gomes, and F. Hellmann, “Asymptotic analysis of the EPRL four-simplex amplitude,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 50, no. 11, Article ID 112504, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. J. W. Barrett, R. J. Dowdall, W. J. Fairbairn, H. Gomes, F. Hellmann, and R. Pereira, “Asymptotics of 4d spin foam models,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 43, p. 2421, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  69. F. Conrady and L. Freidel, “On the semiclassical limit of 4D spin foam models,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 10, Article ID 104023, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  70. S. Liberati, F. Girelli, and L. Sindoni, “Analogue models for emergent gravity,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0909.3834.
  71. Z. C. Gu and X. G. Wen, “Emergence of helicity ±2 modes (gravitons) from qubit models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 863, no. 1, pp. 90–129, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  72. A. Hamma and F. Markopoulou, “Background independent condensed matter models for quantum gravity,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, Article ID 095006, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  73. T. Fleming, M. Gross, and R. Renken, “Ising-Link quantum gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 7363–7371, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. W. Beirl, H. Markum, and J. Riedler, “Two-dimensional lattice gravity as a spin system,” International Journal of Modern Physics C, vol. 5, p. 359, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  75. E. Bittner, A. Hauke, H. Markum, J. Riedler, C. Holm, and W. Janke, “Z(2)-Regge versus standard Regge calculus in two dimensions,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 12, Article ID 124018, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. E. Bittner, W. Janke, and H. Markum, “Ising spins coupled to a four-dimensional discrete Regge skeleton,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 2, Article ID 024008, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. H. A. Kramers and G. H. Wannier, “Statistics of the two-dimensional ferromagnet. Part i,” Physical Review, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 252–262, 1941. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. R. Savit, “Duality in field theory and statistical systems,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 453–487, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. W. Fulton and J. Harris, RepresentAtion Theory: A First Course, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  80. F. Girelli and H. Pfeiffer, “Higher gauge theory: differential versus integral formulation,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 45, no. 10, Article ID 3949, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. F. Girelli, H. Pfeiffer, and E. M. Popescu, “Topological higher gauge theory: from BF to BFCG theory,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 49, no. 3, Article ID 032503, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. J. Oitmaa, C. Hamer, and W. Zheng, Series Expansion Methods for Strongly Interacting Lattice Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2006.
  83. F. Conrady, “Geometric spin foams, Yang-Mills theory and background-independent models,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0504059.
  84. J. Drouffe and J. Zuber, “Strong coupling and mean field methods in lattice gauge theories,” Physics Reports, vol. 102, no. 1-2, pp. 1–119, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. M. Bojowald and A. Perez, “Spin foam quantization and anomalies,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 877–907, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. B. Bahr, “On knottings in the physical Hilbert space of LQG as given by the EPRL model,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 4, Article ID 045002, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  87. B. Bahr, F. Hellmann, W. Kaminski, M. Kisielowski, and J. Lewandowski, “Operator spin foam models,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 10, Article ID 105003, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  88. C. Rovelli and M. Smerlak, “In quantum gravity, summing is refining,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, Article ID 055004, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  89. G. De Las Cuevas, W. Dür, H. J. Briegel, and M. A. Martin-Delgado, “Mapping all classical spin models to a lattice gauge theory,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 12, Article ID 043014, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. J. B. Kogut, “An introduction to lattice gauge theory and spin systems,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 659–713, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. R. Oeckl and H. Pfeiffer, “The dual of pure non-Abelian lattice gauge theory as a spin foam model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 598, no. 1-2, pp. 400–426, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. F. Conrady, “Analytic derivation of dual gluons and monopoles from SU(2) lattice Yang-Mills theory. I. BF Yang-Mills representation,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610236.
  93. F. Conrady, “Analytic derivation of dual gluons and monopoles from SU(2) lattice Yang-Mills theory. II. Spin foam representation,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0610237.
  94. M. Rakowski, “Topological modes in dual lattice models,” Physical Review D, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 354–357, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. I. Montvay and G. Münster, Quantum Fields on a Lattice, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1994.
  96. M. Martellini and M. Zeni, “Feynman rules and beta-function for the BF Yang-Mills theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 401, no. 1-2, pp. 62–68, 1997. View at Google Scholar
  97. A. S. Cattaneo, P. Cotta-Ramusino, F. Fucito et al., “Four-dimensional Yang-Mills theory as a deformation of topological BF theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 197, no. 3, pp. 571–621, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. L. Smolin and A. Starodubtsev, “General relativity with a topological phase: an action principle,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0311163.
  99. A. Starodubtsev, Topological methods in quantum gravity [Ph.D. thesis], University of Waterloo, 2005.
  100. D. Birmingham and M. Rakowski, “State sum models and simplicial cohomology,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 135–154, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  101. D. Birmingham and M. Rakowski, “On Dijkgraaf-Witten type invariants,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 363–374, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. S. w. Chung, M. Fukuma, and A. D. Shapere, “Structure of topological lattice field theories in three-dimensions,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 1305, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. M. Asano and S. Higuchi, “On three-dimensional topological field theories constructed from Dω(G) for finite groups,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 9, no. 25, p. 2359, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. J. C. Baez, “An introduction to spin foam models of BF theory and quantum gravity,” in Geometry and Quantum Physics, vol. 543 of Lecture Notes in Physics, pp. 25–93, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  105. V. Bonzom and M. Smerlak, “Bubble divergences from cellular cohomology,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 295–305, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  106. V. Bonzom and M. Smerlak, “Bubble divergences from twisted cohomology,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 312, no. 2, pp. 399–426, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. B. Dittrich and J. P. Ryan, “Phase space descriptions for simplicial 4d geometries,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 6, Article ID 065006, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. L. Freidel and K. Krasnov, “Spin foam models and the classical action principle,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 2, pp. 1183–1247, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  109. H. Pfeiffer, “Dual variables and a connection picture for the Euclidean Barrett-Crane model,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1109–1137, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. P. Cvitanovic, Group Theory: Birdtracks, Lie's, and Exceptional Groups, Princeton University Pres, New Jersey, NJ, USA, 2008.
  111. J. Kogut and L. Susskind, “Hamiltonian formulation of Wilson's lattice gauge theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 395–408, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  112. J. Smit, Introduction to Quantum Fields on a lattice: A Robust Mate, vol. 15 of Cambridge Lecture Notes in Physics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2002.
  113. J. J. Halliwell and J. B. Hartle, “Wave functions constructed from an invariant sum over histories satisfy constraints,” Physical Review D, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1170–1194, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  114. C. Rovelli, “The projector on physical states in loop quantum gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 59, no. 10, Article ID 104015, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  115. K. Noui and A. Perez, “Three-dimensional loop quantum gravity: physical scalar product and spin-foam models,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 1739–1761, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  116. T. Thiemann, “Anomaly-free formulation of non-perturbative, four-dimensional Lorentzian quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 380, no. 3-4, pp. 257–264, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  117. T. Thiemann, “Quantum spin dynamics (QSD),” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 839, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  118. T. Thiemann, “QSD III: quantum constraint algebra and physical scalar product in quantum general relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 1207–1247, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  119. R. Sorkin, “Time evolution problem in Regge Calculus,” Physical Review D, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 385–396, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  120. R. Sorkin, “Erratum: time-evolution problem in Regge calculus,” Physical Review D, vol. 23, no. 2, p. 565, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  121. J. W. Barrett, M. Galassi, W. A. Miller, R. D. Sorkin, P. A. Tuckey, and R. M. Williams, “A Paralellizable implicit evolution scheme for Regge calculus,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 815–835, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  122. B. Bahr, B. Dittrich, and S. He, “Coarse-graining free theories with gauge symmetries: the linearized case,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, Article ID 045009, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  123. T. Thiemann, “The Phoenix project: master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 7, Article ID 2211, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  124. B. Dittrich and T. Thiemann, “Testing the master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity: I. General framework,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1025–1065, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  125. B. Dittrich and T. Thiemann, “Testing the master constraint programme for loop quantum gravity. II: finite dimensional systems,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 4, Article ID 1067, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  126. D. Marolf, “Group averaging and refined algebraic quantization: where are we now?” http://arxiv.org/abs/grqc/0011112.
  127. P. G. Bergmann, “Observables in general relativity,” Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 510–514, 1961. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  128. C. Rovelli, “What is observable in classical and quantum gravity?” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 297, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  129. C. Rovelli, “Partial observables,” Physical Review D, vol. 65, Article ID 124013, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  130. B. Dittrich, “Partial and complete observables for Hamiltonian constrained systems,” General Relativity and Gravitation, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1891–1927, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  131. B. Dittrich, “Partial and complete observables for canonical general relativity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, no. 22, Article ID 6155, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  132. C. G. Torre, “Gravitational observables and local symmetries,” Physical Review D, vol. 48, no. 6, pp. 2373–2376, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  133. S. Elitzur, “Impossibility of spontaneously breaking local symmetries,” Physical Review D, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 3978–3982, 1975. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  134. L. Freidel and D. Louapre, “Ponzano-Regge model revisited. I: Gauge fixing, observables and interacting spinning particles,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 24, Article ID 5685, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  135. K. Noui and A. Perez, “Three dimensional loop quantum gravity: coupling to point particles,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 22, no. 21, Article ID 4489, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  136. K. Noui, “Three dimensional loop quantum gravity: particles and the quantum double,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 47, no. 10, Article ID 102501, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  137. A. Perez, “On the regularization ambiguities in loop quantum gravity,” Physical Review D, vol. 73, Article ID 044007, 18 pages, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  138. J. C. Baez and A. Perez, “Quantization of strings and branes coupled to BF theory,” Advances in Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, vol. 11, Article ID 060508, pp. 451–469, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  139. W. J. Fairbairn and A. Perez, “Extended matter coupled to BF theory,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 2, Article ID 024013, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  140. W. J. Fairbairn, “On gravitational defects, particles and strings,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2008, no. 9, p. 126, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  141. H. Bombin and M. A. Martin-Delgado, “Family of non-Abelian Kitaev models on a lattice: topological condensation and confinement,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 11, Article ID 115421, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  142. Z. Kadar, A. Marzuoli, and M. Rasetti, “Braiding and entanglement in spin networks: a combinatorical approach to topological phases,” International Journal of Quantum Information, vol. 7, p. 195, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  143. Z. Kadar, A. Marzuoli, and M. Rasetti, “Microscopic description of 2d topological phases, duality, and 3D state sums,” Advances in Mathematical Physics, vol. 2010, Article ID 671039, 18 pages, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  144. L. Freidel, J. Zapata, and M. Tylutki, Observables in the Hamiltonian formulation of the Ponzano-Regge model [M.S. thesis], Uniwersytet Jagiellonski, Krakow, Poland, 2008.
  145. H. Waelbroeck and J. A. Zapata, “Translation symmetry in 2+1 Regge calculus,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 10, no. 9, Article ID 1923, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  146. H. Waelbroeck and J. A. Zapata, “2 +1 covariant lattice theory and t'Hooft's formulation,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 13, p. 1761, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  147. V. Bonzom, “Spin foam models and the Wheeler-DeWitt equation for the quantum 4-simplex,” Physical Review D, vol. 84, Article ID 024009, 13 pages, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  148. A. Ashtekar, “New variables for classical and quantum gravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 57, no. 18, pp. 2244–2247, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  149. A. Ashtekar, New Perspepectives in Canonical Gravity, Monographs and Textbooks in Physical Science, Bibliopolis, Napoli, Italy, 1988.
  150. A. Ashtekar, Lectures on Non-Perturbative Canonical Gravity, World Scientific, Singapore, 1991.
  151. M. Campiglia, C. Di Bartolo, R. Gambini, and J. Pullin, “Uniform discretizations: a new approach for the quantization of totally constrained systems,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 12, Article ID 124012, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  152. E. Alesci, K. Noui, and F. Sardelli, “Spin-foam models and the physical scalar product,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 10, Article ID 104009, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  153. E. Alesci and C. Rovelli, “A regularization of the hamiltonian constraint compatible with the spinfoam dynamics,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 4, Article ID 044007, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  154. P. Di Francesco, P. Ginsparg, and J. Zinn-Justin, “2D gravity and random matrices,” Physics Report, vol. 254, no. 1-2, pp. 1–133, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  155. F. David, “Simplicial quantum gravity and random lattices,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9303127.
  156. F. David, “Planar diagrams, two-dimensional lattice gravity and surface models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 257, pp. 45–58, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  157. V. A. Kazakov, “Bilocal regularization of models of random surfaces,” Physics Letters B, vol. 150, no. 4, pp. 282–284, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  158. D. J. Gross and A. A. Migdal, “Nonperturbative two-dimensional quantum gravity,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 127–130, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  159. D. J. Gross and A. A. Migdal, “A nonperturbative treatment of two-dimensional quantum gravity,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 340, no. 2-3, pp. 333–365, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  160. V. A. Kazakov, “Ising model on a dynamical planar random lattice: exact solution,” Physics Letters A, vol. 119, no. 3, pp. 140–144, 1986. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  161. D. V. Boulatov and V. A. Kazakov, “The ising model on a random planar lattice: the structure of the phase transition and the exact critical exponents,” Physics Letters B, vol. 186, no. 3-4, pp. 379–384, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  162. V. A. Kazakov and A. A. Migdal, “Induced QCD at large N,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 397, no. 1-2, Article ID 920601, pp. 214–238, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  163. P. H. Ginsparg and G. W. Moore, “Lectures on 2-D gravity and 2-D string,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/9304011.
  164. P. Zinn-Justin and J. B. Zuber, “Matrix integrals and the counting of tangles and links,” http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/9904019.
  165. J. L. Jacobsen and P. Zinn-Justin, “A Transfer matrix approach to the enumeration of knots,” http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0102015.
  166. P. Zinn-Justin, “The General O(n) quartic matrix model and its application to counting tangles and links,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 238, pp. 287–304, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  167. P. Zinn-Justin and J. Zuber, “Matrix integrals and the generation and counting of virtual tangles and links,” Journal of Knot Theory and its Ramifications, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 325–355, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  168. M. L. Mehta, Random Matrices, Academic Press, New York, NY, USA, 1991.
  169. G. T. Hooft, “A planar diagram theory for strong interactions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 461–473, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  170. G. T. Hooft, “A two-dimensional model for mesons,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 461–470, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  171. E. Brézin, C. Itzykson, G. Parisi, and J. B. Zuber, “Planar diagrams,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 35–51, 1978. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  172. M. L. Mehta, “A method of integration over matrix variables,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 327–340, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  173. C. Itzykson and J.-B. Zuber, “The planar approximation. II,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 411–421, 1979. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  174. D. Bessis, C. Itzykson, and J. B. Zuber, “Quantum field theory techniques in graphical enumeration,” Advances in Applied Mathematics, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 109–157, 1980. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  175. P. Di Francesco and C. Itzykson, “A Generating function for fatgraphs,” Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincaré (A) Physique Théorique, vol. 59, pp. 117–140, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  176. V. A. Kazakov, M. Staudacher, and T. Wynter, “Character expansion methods for matrix models of dually weighted graphs,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 451–468, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  177. J. Ambjørn, D. V. Boulatov, A. Krzywicki, and S. Varsted, “The vacuum in three-dimensional simplicial quantum gravity,” Physics Letters B, vol. 276, no. 4, pp. 432–436, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  178. R. Gurau, “Colored group field theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 304, pp. 69–93, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  179. J. Ben Geloun, R. Gurau, and V. Rivasseau, “EPRL/FK group field theory,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 92, no. 6, Article ID 60008, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  180. R. Gurau, “Lost in translation: topological singularities in group field theory,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 27, no. 23, Article ID 235023, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  181. M. Smerlak, “Comment on ‘Lost in translation: topological singularities in group field theory’,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 17, Article ID 178001, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  182. R. Gurau, “Reply to comment on ‘Lost in translation: topological singularities in group field theory’,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 17, Article ID 178002, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  183. L. Freidel, R. Gurau, and D. Oriti, “Group field theory renormalization in the 3D case: power counting of divergences,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 4, Article ID 044007, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  184. J. Magnen, K. Noui, V. Rivasseau, and M. Smerlak, “Scaling behavior of three-dimensional group field theory,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 26, no. 18, Article ID 185012, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  185. J. B. Geloun, T. Krajewski, J. Magnen, and V. Rivasseau, “Linearized group field theory and power-counting theorems,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 27, no. 15, Article ID 155012, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  186. R. Gurau, “The 1/N Expansion of Colored Tensor Models,” Annales Henri Poincare, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 829–847, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  187. R. Gurau and V. Rivasseau, “The 1/N expansion of colored tensor models in arbitrary dimension,” EPL, vol. 95, no. 5, Article ID 50004, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  188. R. Gurau, “The Complete 1/N Expansion of Colored Tensor Models in Arbitrary Dimension,” Annales Henri Poincare, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 399–423, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  189. V. Bonzom, “New 1/N expansions in random tensor models,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1306, p. 062, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  190. V. Bonzom, R. Gurau, A. Riello, and V. Rivasseau, “Critical behavior of colored tensor models in the large N limit,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 853, no. 1, pp. 174–195, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  191. V. Bonzom, R. Gurau, A. Riello, and V. Rivasseau, “Critical behavior of colored tensor models in the large N limit,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 853, no. 1, pp. 174–195, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  192. V. Bonzom, R. Gurau, and V. Rivasseau, “The Ising model on random lattices in arbitrary dimensions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 711, no. 1, pp. 88–96, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  193. V. Bonzom, “Multicritical tensor models and hard dimers on spherical random lattices,” Physics Letters A, vol. 377, no. 7, pp. 501–506, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  194. V. Bonzom and H. Erbin, “Coupling of hard dimers to dynamical lattices via random tensors,” Journal of Statistical Mechanics, vol. 1209, Article ID P09009, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  195. D. Benedetti and R. Gurau, “Phase transition in dually weighted colored tensor models,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 855, no. 2, pp. 420–437, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  196. J. Ambjørn, B. Durhuus, and T. Jónsson, “Summing over all genera for d> 1: a toy model,” Physics Letters B, vol. 244, no. 3-4, pp. 403–412, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  197. P. Bialas and Z. Burda, “Phase transition in uctuating branched geometry,” Physics Letters B, vol. 384, no. 1–4, pp. 75–80, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  198. R. Gurau and J. P. Ryan, “Melons are branched polymers,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1302.4386.
  199. R. Gurau, “Universality for random tensors,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0519.
  200. R. Gurau, “A generalization of the Virasoro algebra to arbitrary dimensions,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 852, no. 3, pp. 592–614, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  201. R. Gurau, “The Schwinger Dyson equations and the algebra of constraints of random tensor models at all orders,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 865, no. 1, pp. 133–147, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  202. V. Bonzom, “Revisiting random tensor models at large N via the Schwinger-Dyson equations,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1303, p. 160, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  203. R. De Pietri and C. Petronio, “Feynman diagrams of generalized matrix models and the associated manifolds in dimension four,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 41, no. 10, pp. 6671–6688, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  204. D. V. Boulatov, “A Model of three-dimensional lattice gravity,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 7, no. 18, p. 1629, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  205. H. Ooguri, “Topological lattice models in four-dimensions,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 7, no. 30, pp. 2799–2810, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  206. R. De Pietri, L. Freidel, K. Krasnov, and C. Rovelli, “Barrett-Crane model from a Boulatov-Ooguri field theory over a homogeneous space,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 574, no. 3, pp. 785–806, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  207. A. Baratin, F. Girelli, and D. Oriti, “Diffeomorphisms in group field theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 83, no. 10, Article ID 104051, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  208. J. Ben Geloun and V. Bonzom, “Radiative corrections in the Boulatov-Ooguri tensor model: the 2-point function,” International Journal of Theoretical Physics, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 2819–2841, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  209. J. B. Geloun and V. Rivasseau, “A renormalizable 4-dimensional tensor field theory,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, vol. 318, no. 1, pp. 69–109, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  210. J. B. Geloun and D. O. Samary, “3D tensor field theory: renormalization and one-loop β-functions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1201.0176.
  211. J. B. Geloun, “Two and four-loop β-functions of rank 4 renormalizable tensor field theories,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, Article ID 235011, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  212. J. B. Geloun and V. Rivasseau, “Addendum to ‘A renormalizable 4-dimensional tensor field theory’,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.4606.
  213. J. B. Geloun, “Asymptotic freedom of rank 4 tensor group field theory,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.5490.
  214. J. B. Geloun and E. R. Livine, “Some classes of renormalizable tensor models,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.0416.
  215. S. Carrozza and D. Oriti, “Bounding bubbles: the vertex representation of 3d group field theory and the suppression of pseudomanifolds,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 4, Article ID 044004, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  216. S. Carrozza and D. Oriti, “Bubbles and jackets: new scaling bounds in topological group field theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 1206, p. 092, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  217. S. Carrozza, D. Oriti, and V. Rivasseau, “Renormalization of tensorial group field theories: Abelian U(1) models in four dimensions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.6734.
  218. S. Carrozza, D. Oriti, and V. Rivasseau, “Renormalization of an SU(2) tensorial group field theory in three dimensions,” http://arxiv.org/abs/1303.6772.
  219. D. Oriti and L. Sindoni, “Toward classical geometrodynamics from the group field theory hydrodynamics,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, Article ID 025006, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  220. L. Freidel, D. Oriti, and J. Ryan, “A group field theory for 3d quantum gravity coupled to a scalar field,” http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0506067.
  221. D. Oriti and J. Ryan, “Group field theory formulation of 3-D quantum gravity coupled to matter fields,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 23, pp. 6543–6576, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  222. R. J. Dowdall, “Wilson loops, geometric operators and fermions in 3d group field theory,” http://arxiv.org/abs/0911.2391.
  223. F. Girelli and E. R. Livine, “A deformed Poincaré invariance for group field theories,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 27, no. 24, Article ID 245018, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  224. M. Dupuis, F. Girelli, and E. R. Livine, “Spinors group field theory and Voros star product: first contact,” Physical Review D, vol. 86, Article ID 105034, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  225. W. J. Fairbairn and E. R. Livine, “3D spinfoam quantum gravity: matter as a phase of the group field theory,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 5277–5297, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  226. F. Girelli, E. R. Livine, and D. Oriti, “4D deformed special relativity from group field theories,” Physical Review D, vol. 81, no. 2, Article ID 024015, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  227. E. R. Livine, D. Oriti, and J. P. Ryan, “Effective Hamiltonian constraint from group field theory,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 24, Article ID 245010, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  228. J. B. Geloun, “Classical group field theory,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, Article ID 022901, p. 53, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  229. G. Calcagni, S. Gielen, and D. Oriti, “Group field cosmology: a cosmological field theory of quantum geometry,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 29, no. 10, Article ID 105005, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  230. V. Bonzom, R. Gurau, and V. Rivasseau, “Random tensor models in the large N limit: uncoloring the colored tensor models,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 8, Article ID 084037, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  231. V. A. Kazakov, “The appearance of matter fields from quantum fluctuations of 2D-gravity,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 4, p. 2125, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  232. V. A. Kazakov, “Exactly solvable Potts models, bond- and tree-like percolation on dynamical (random) planar lattice,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 4, pp. 93–97, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  233. V. Bonzom and M. Smerlak, “Bubble divergences from cellular cohomology,” Letters in Mathematical Physics, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 295–305, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  234. V. Bonzom and M. Smerlak, “Bubble Divergences from Twisted Cohomology,” Communications in Mathematical Physics, pp. 1–28, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  235. V. Bonzom and M. Smerlak, “Bubble divergences: sorting out topology from cell structure,” Annales Henri Poincare, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 185–208, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  236. F. Markopoulou, “An algebraic approach to coarse graining,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0006199.
  237. F. Markopoulou, “Coarse graining in spin foam models,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 777–799, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  238. R. Oeckl, “Renormalization of discrete models without background,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 657, no. 1–3, pp. 107–138, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  239. M. Levin and C. P. Nave, “Tensor renormalization group approach to two-dimensional classical lattice models,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 99, no. 12, Article ID 120601, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  240. Z.-C. Gu, M. Levin, and X.-G. Wen, “Tensor-entanglement renormalization group approach as a unified method for symmetry breaking and topological phase transitions,” Physical Review B, vol. 78, no. 20, Article ID 205116, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  241. L. Tagliacozzo and G. Vidal, “Entanglement renormalization and gauge symmetry,” Physical Review B, vol. 83, no. 11, Article ID 115127, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  242. B. Dittrich, F. C. Eckert, and M. Martin-Benito, “Coarse graining methods for spin net and spin foam models,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 14, Article ID 35008, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  243. B. Dittrich, “From the discrete to the continuous: towards a cylindrically consistent dynamics,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 14, Article ID 123004, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  244. L. Freidel and E. R. Livine, “Effective 3D quantum gravity and effective noncommutative quantum field theory,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 96, no. 22, Article ID 221301, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  245. L. Freidel and S. Majid, “Noncommutative harmonic analysis, sampling theory and the Duflo map in 2+1 quantum gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 25, no. 4, Article ID 045006, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  246. A. Baratin, B. Dittrich, D. Oriti, and J. Tambornino, “Non-commutative flux representation for loop quantum gravity,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 17, Article ID 175011, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus