Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages 357-366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.1.3.357
Research Article

Inter-Observer Agreement Among Medical Professionals in Critical Care of Neonates and Children

Osnat Tourgeman-Bashkin,1 David Shinar,1 Yisrael Parmet,1 and Ehud Zmora2

1Department of Industrial Engineering & Management, Faculty of Engineering, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, PO Box 653, Beer Sheva, Israel
2Department of Neonatology, Soroka Medical Center, Faculty of Health Sciences, PO Box 653, Beer Sheva, Israel

Copyright © 2010 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Institute of Medicine, Committee on Quality of Health Care in America, In: Kohn L.T., Corrigan J.M., Donaldson M.S., eds. To Err is Human Building a Safer Health System, Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2000.
  2. M. S. Bogner, Human error in medicine, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1994.
  3. A. Theodossi, R. P. Knill-Jones, A. Skene et al., “Inter-observer variation of symptoms and signs in jaundice,” Liver, vol. 1, pp. 21–32, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  4. K. W. Lindsay, G. M. Teasdale, and R. P. Knill-Jones, “Observer variability in assessing the clinical features of subarachnoid hemorrhage,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 58, pp. 57–62, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  5. F. Tomasello, F. Mariani, C. Fieschi et al., “Assessment of inter-observer differences in the Italian multicenter study on reversible cerebral ischemia,” Stroke, vol. 13, pp. 32–35, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  6. J. S. Cowen and M. A. Kelly, “Errors and bias in using predictive scoring systems,” Critical Care Clinics, vol. 10, pp. 53–78, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  7. D. Teres, “Comment on “The case for using objective scoring systems to predict intensive care outcome”,” Critical Care Clinics, vol. 10, pp. 91–92, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  8. D. Teres and S. Lemeshow, “Why severity models should be used with caution,” Critical Care Clinics, vol. 10, pp. 93–110, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Badihi, The Formal Structure of Thinking and Its Implications to Communication and Performance Errors, Research Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Science. Technion, Israel. 1993.
  10. A. M. Joshua, D. S. Celermajer, and M. R. Stockler, “Beauty is in the eye of the examiner: reaching agreement about physical signs and their value,” Internal Medicine Journal, vol. 35, pp. 178–787, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. F. Cook, Disagreement on Medical Error Reporting May Place Patients at Risk, New American Journal of Nursing Study. Journal to Convene Special Symposia to Review and Address Challenges, Advancing Nursing Practice Excellence: State of the Science, 2004.
  12. O. Tourgeman-Bashkin, D. Shinar, and E. Zmora, “causes of near misses in critical care of neonates and children,” Acta Pediatrica, vol. 97, pp. 299–303, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. L. Fleiss, “Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 76, pp. 378–382, 1971. View at Google Scholar
  14. E. J. Thomas, J. B. Sexton, and R. L. Helmreich, “Discrepant attitudes about teamwork among critical care nurses and physicians,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 956–959, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  15. W. D. Croser, “The contemporary nurse-physician relationship: Insights from scholars outside the two professions,” Nurse Outlook, vol. 48, pp. 263–268, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  16. E. B. Raftery and W. W. Holland, “Examination of the Heart: an investigation into variation,” American Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 85, pp. 438–44, 1967. View at Google Scholar
  17. F. Tomasello, F. Mariani, C. Fieschi, C. Argentino, G. Bono, L. De Zanche et al., “Assessment of interobserver differences in the Italian multicenter study on reversible cerebral ischemia,” Stroke, vol. 13, pp. 32–5, 1982. View at Google Scholar
  18. W. B. Rouse and N. M. Morris, “On looking into the black box: prospects and limits in the search for mental models,” Psychological bulletin, vol. 100, pp. 349–363, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  19. R. J. Stout, J. A. Cannon-Bowers, E. Salas, and D. M. Milanovich, “Planning, Shared Mental Models, and Coordinated Performance: An Empirical Link Is Established,” Human Factors, vol. 41, pp. 61–71, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  20. D. P. Minionis, S. J. Zaccaro, and R. Perez, “Shared mental models, team coordination, and team performance,” in Paper presented at the 10th Annual Conference of the Society for Industrial/Organizational Psychology, Orlando, FL, 1995.