Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages 551-569
http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.3.4.551
Research Article

Information-Guided Surgery of Intracranial Gliomas: Overview of an Advanced Intraoperative Technology

Yoshihiro Muragaki,1,2 Mikhail Chernov,1,2 Kitaro Yoshimitsu,1 Takashi Suzuki,1 Hiroshi Iseki,1,2 Takashi Maruyama,1,2 Manabu Tamura,1,2 Soko Ikuta,1 Masayuki Nitta,1 Atsushi Watanabe,1 Taiichi Saito,1,2 Jun Okamoto,1 Chiharu Niki,1 Motohiro Hayashi,1,2 and Kintomo Takakura1,2

1Faculty of Advanced Techno-Surgery, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
2Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Received 1 November 2011; Accepted 1 August 2012

Copyright © 2012 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Y. Muragaki, H. Iseki, T. Maruyama et al., “Usefulness of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging for glioma surgery,” Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol. 98, pp. 67–75, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  2. H. Iseki, R. Nakamura, Y. Muragaki et al., “Advanced computer-aided intraoperative technologies for information-guided surgical management of gliomas: Tokyo Women's Medical University experience,” Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 285–291, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  3. N. Ozawa, Y. Muragaki, R. Nakamura, and H. Iseki, “Intraoperative diffusion-weighted imaging for visualization of the pyramidal tracts. Part I: pre-clinical validation of the scanning protocol,” Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 63–66, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  4. N. Ozawa, Y. Muragaki, R. Nakamura, and H. Iseki, “Intraoperative diffusion-weighted imaging for visualization of the pyramidal tracts. Part II: clinical study of usefulness and efficacy,” Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 67–71, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  5. Y. Muragaki, H. Iseki, T. Maruyama et al., “Advanced surgical management of gliomas: technological requirements, concept of information-guided resection, and clinical results,” in Diagnostic Techniques and Surgical Management of Brain Tumors, A. L. Abujambra, Ed., pp. 517–534, InTech, Croatia, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  6. N. Ozawa, Y. Muragaki, R. Nakamura, and H. Iseki, “Identification of the pyramidal tract by neuronavigation based on intraoperative diffusion-weighted imaging combined with subcortical stimulation,” Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, vol. 87, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. T. Ando, E. Kobayashi, H. Liao et al., “Precise comparison of protoporphyrin IX fluorescence spectra with pathological results for brain tumor tissue identification,” Brain Tumor Pathology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 43–51, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  8. K. Yoshimitsu, T. Maruyama, Y. Muragaki et al., “Wireless modification of the intraoperative examination monitor for awake surgery,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 472–476, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  9. Y. Muragaki, H. Iseki, T. Maruyama et al., “Information-guided surgical management of gliomas using low-field-strength intraoperative MRI,” Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol. 109, pp. 67–72, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. M. K. Belhawi, F. W. A. Hoefnagels, J. C. Baaijen et al., “Early postoperative MRI overestimates residual tumour after resection of gliomas with no or minimal enhancement,” European Radiology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 1526–1534, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  11. “Report of brain tumor registry of Japan (1984–2000) 12th edition,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 49, Suppl., pp. 1–101, 2009.
  12. K. Lutz, A. Radbruch, B. Wiestler, P. Baumer, W. Wick, and M. Bendszus, “Neuroradiological response criteria for high-grade gliomas,” Clinical Neuroradiology, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 199–205, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  13. M. A. Vogelbaum, S. Jost, M. K. Aghi et al., “Application of novel response/progression measures for surgically delivered therapies for gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) working group,” Neurosurgery, vol. 70, no. 1, pp. 234–244, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  14. C. Shinohara, Y. Muragaki, T. Maruyama et al., “Long-term prognostic assessment of 185 newly diagnosed gliomas: Grade III glioma showed prognosis comparable to that of Grade II glioma,” Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 730–733, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  15. W. Stummer, M. J. van den Bent, and M. Westphal, “Cytoreductive surgery of glioblastoma as the key to successful adjuvant therapies: new arguments in an old discussion,” Acta Neurochirurgica, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 1211–1218, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. A. Proescholdt, C. Macher, C. Woertgen, and A. Brawanski, “Level of evidence in the literature concerning brain tumor resection,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 95–98, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  17. W. Stummer, H. J. Reulen, T. Meinel et al., “Extent of resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: identification of and adjustment for bias,” Neurosurgery, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 564–576, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  18. M. J. van den Bent, A. F. Carpentier, A. A. Brandes et al., “Adjuvant procarbasine, lomustine, and vincristine improves progression-free survival but not overall survival in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendrogliomas and oligoastrocytomas: a randomized European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer phase III trial,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 18, pp. 2715–2722, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  19. M. Lacroix, D. Abi-Said, D. R. Fourney et al., “A multivariate analysis of 416 patients with glioblastoma multiforme: prognosis, extent of resection, and survival,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 95, no. 2, pp. 190–198, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  20. N. Sanai, M. Y. Polley, M. W. McDermott, A. T. Parsa, and M. S. Berger, “An extent of resection threshold for newly diagnosed glioblastomas,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 3–8, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  21. U. Pichlmeier, A. Bink, G. Schackert, W. Stummer, and the ALA Glioma Study Group, “Resection and survival in glioblastoma multiforme: an RTOG recursive partitioning analysis of ALA study patients,” Neuro-Oncology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 1025–1034, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  22. T. Gasser, A. Szelenyi, C. Senft et al., “Intraoperative MRI and functional mapping,” Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol. 109, pp. 61–65, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  23. M. Hadani, R. Spiegelman, Z. Feldman, H. Berkenstadt, and Z. Ram, “Novel, compact, intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging-guided system for conventional neurosurgical operating rooms,” Neurosurgery, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 799–809, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  24. C. Senft, K. Franz, C. T. Ulrich et al., “Low field intraoperative MRI-guided surgery of gliomas: a single center experience,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 112, no. 3, pp. 237–243, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  25. W. A. Hall and C. L. Truwit, “Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging,” Acta Neurochirurgica Supplement, vol. 109, pp. 119–129, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  26. C. Nimsky, O. Ganslandt, B. Von Keller, J. Romstock, and R. Fahlbusch, “Intraoperative high-field-strength MR imaging: implementation and experience in 200 patients,” Radiology, vol. 233, no. 1, pp. 67–78, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  27. M. N. Pamir, K. Ozduman, A. Dincer, E. Yildiz, S. Peker, and M. M. Ozek, “First intraoperative, shared resource, ultrahigh-field 3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system and its application in low-grade glioma resection,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 112, no. 1, pp. 57–69, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  28. A. Fransson, P. Andreo, and R. Potter, “Aspects of MR image distortions in radiotherapy treatment planning,” Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, vol. 177, no. 2, pp. 59–73, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  29. C. Senft, A. Bink, K. Franz, H. Vatter, T. Gasser, and V. Seifert, “Intraoperative MRI guidance and extent of resection in glioma surgery: a randomized, controlled trial,” Lancet Oncology, vol. 12, no. 11, pp. 997–1003, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  30. W. Stummer, U. Pichlmeier, T. Meinel et al., “Fluorescence-guided surgery with 5-aminolevulinic acid for resection of malignant glioma: a randomized controlled multicenter phase III trial,” Lancet Oncology, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 392–401, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  31. G. Ojemann, J. Ojemann, E. Lettich, and M. Berger, “Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere: an electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 316–326, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  32. N. Sanai, Z. Mirzadeh, and M. S. Berger, “Functional outcome after language mapping for glioma resection,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 358, no. 1, pp. 18–27, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  33. N. Mikuni and S. Miyamoto, “Surgical treatment of glioma: extent of resection applying functional neurosurgery,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 720–726, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  34. C. Senft, M. T. Forster, A. Bink et al., “Optimizing the extent of resection in eloquently located gliomas by combining intraoperative MRI guidance with intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 109, no. 1, pp. 81–90, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  35. L. Bello, M. Galucci, M. Fava et al., “Intraoperative subcortical language tract mapping guides surgical removal of gliomas involving speech areas,” Neurosurgery, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 67–82, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  36. S. S. Kim, I. E. McCutcheon, D. Suki et al., “Awake craniotomy for brain tumors near eloquent cortex: correlation of intraoperative cortical mapping with neurological outcomes in 309 consecutive patients,” Neurosurgery, vol. 64, no. 5, pp. 836–846, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  37. N. Otani, M. Bjeljac, C. Muroi et al., “Awake surgery for glioma resection in eloquent areas: Zurich's experience and review,” Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 501–511, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  38. T. Suzuki, Y. Sakurai, K. Yoshimitsu, K. Nambu, Y. Muragaki, and H. Iseki, “Intraoperative multichannel audio-visual information recording and automatic surgical phase and incident detection,” in Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, pp. 1190–1193.
  39. L. Zamorano, Q. Li, S. Jain, and G. Kaur, “Robotics in neurosurgery: state of the art and future technological challenges,” International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 7–22, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  40. K. Hongo, S. Kobayashi, Y. Kakizawa et al., “NeuRobot: telecontrolled micromanipulator system for minimally invasive microneurosurgery-preliminary results,” Neurosurgery, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 985–988, 2002. View at Google Scholar