Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume 4, Issue 3, Pages 427-451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1260/2040-2295.4.3.427
Research Article

Design of Electronic Medical Record User Interfaces: A Matrix-Based Method for Improving Usability

Kushtrim Kuqi,1 Tim Eveleigh,1 Thomas Holzer,1 Shahryar Sarkani,1 James E. Levin,2 and Rebecca S. Crowley3

1Department of Engineering Management and Systems Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington DC, USA
2Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
3Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA

Received 1 December 2012; Accepted 1 April 2013

Copyright © 2013 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, “Defining and testing EMR usability: principles and proposed methods of EMR usability evaluation and rating,” 2009, http://www.himss.org/files/HIMSSorg/content/files/HIMSS_DefiningandTestingEMRUsability.pdf, Accessed Feb 25, 2013.
  2. J. B. Smelcer, H. Jacobs-Miller, and L. Kantrovich, “Usability of electronic medical records,” Journal of Usability Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 70–84, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  3. P. Sengstack, “CPOE configuration to reduce medication errors: a literature review on the safety of CPOE systems and design recommendations,” The Journal of Healthcare Information Management, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 26–34, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  4. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Guidance on usability. 1998, http://www.it.uu.se/edu/course/homepage/acsd/vt09/ISO9241part11.pdf.
  5. E. Jamoom, M. S. Beatty, A. Bercovitz, D. Woodwell, and K. Palso, Rechtsteiner, E. Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems: United States, 2011, NCHS data brief, no 98, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD, 2012.
  6. J. C. Pham, M. S. Aswani, M. Rosen et al., “Reducing medical errors and adverse events,” Annual Review of Medicine, vol. 63, pp. 447–463, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Koppel, J. P. Metlay, A. Cohen et al., “Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors,” The Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 293, no. 10, pp. 1197–1203, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  8. K. E. Walsh, W. G. Adams, H. Bauchner et al., “Medication errors related to computerized order entry for children,” Pediatrics, vol. 118, no. 5, pp. 1872–1879, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  9. J. Nielsen, Usability Engineering, Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1993.
  10. Department of Health and Human Services, Digital Communications Division. Page Layout. http://www.usability.gov/pdfs/chapter6.pdf, Accessed Feb 10, 2013.
  11. T. Halverson and A. J. Hornof, “Local density guides visual search: sparse groups are first and faster,” in Conf Proc of Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 1–5, 2004.
  12. T. S. Tullis, “The formatting of alphanumeric displays: a review and analysis,” Human Factors, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 657–682, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. W. Kushniruk and V. L. Patel, “Cognitive and usability engineering methods for the evaluation of clinical information systems,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, pp. 37–56, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  14. Y. Liu, A. L. Osvalder, and S. Dahlman, “Exploring user background settings in cognitive walkthrough evaluation of medical prototype interfaces: a case study,” International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, vol. 35, pp. 379–390, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  15. C. Wharton, J. Rieman, C. Lewis, and P. Polson, “The cognitive walkthrough method: A practitioner's guide,” in Usability Inspection Methods, J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack, Eds., pp. 106–139, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  16. M. Hertzum and N. E. Jacobsen, “The evaluator effect: a chilling fact about usability evaluation methods,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 183–204, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  17. A. Sears and D. J. Hess, “Cognitive walkthroughs: Understanding the effect of task-description detail on evaluator performance,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 185–200, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  18. T. Tullis and B. Albert, Measuring the User Experience, Morgan Kaufman, Burlington, MA, 2008.
  19. S. K. Card, T. P. Moran, and A. Newell, “The keystroke-level model for user performance time with interactive systems,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 396–410, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  20. L. Teo, B. E. John, and M. H. Blackmon, “CogTool explorer: a model of goal-directed user exploration that considers information layout,” in Conf Proc of Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2479–2488, 2012.
  21. B. E. John and B. S. Utesch, “Experiences with collaborative, distributed predictive human performance modeling,” in Conf Proc of Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 437–452, 2012.
  22. R. Bellamy, B. E. John, J. Richards, and J. Thomas, “Using CogTool to model programming tasks,” in Conf Proc of Evaluation and Usability of Programming Languages and Tools, pp. 1–6, 2010.
  23. B. E. John, K. Prevas, D. D. Salvucci, and K. Koedinger, “Predictive human performance made easy,” in Conf Proc of Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 455–462, 2004.
  24. P. M. Fitts, “The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 47, pp. 381–391, 1954. View at Google Scholar
  25. S. E. Hudson, B. E. John, K. Knudsen, and M. D. Byrne, “A tool for creating predictive performance models from user interface demonstrations,” in Conf Proc of the ACM Symposium on User Interface and Technology, pp. 93–102, 1999.
  26. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Information Technology: Standards, Implementation Specifications, and Certification Criteria for Electronic Health Record Technology, 2014 Edition, Final Rule. (2012)http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-03-07/html/2012-4430.htm.
  27. S. Z. Lowry and R. M. Schumacher, “NIST guide to the process approach for improving the usability of electronic health records,” NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) – 7741, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  28. C. M. Johnson, T. R. Johnson, and J. Zhang, “A user-centered framework for redesigning healthcare interfaces,” Journal of Biomedical Informatics, vol. 38, pp. 75–87, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  29. S. D. Eppinger and T. R. Browning, Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012.
  30. D. V. Steward, “The design structure system: a method for managing the design of complex systems,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 71–74, 1981. View at Google Scholar
  31. T. R. Browning, “Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 48, no. 3, pp. 292–306, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  32. A. Yassine and D. Braha, “Complex concurrent engineering and the design structure matrix method,” Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 165–176, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  33. M. Danilovic, “Bring your suppliers into your projects – Managing the design of work packages in product development,” Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, vol. 12, pp. 246–257, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  34. E. S. Suh and O. Weck, “Xerox digital printing technology infusion,” in Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications, S. D. Eppinger and T. R. Browning, Eds., pp. 43–48, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  35. J. Nielsen, “Heuristic evaluation,” in Usability Inspection Methods, J. Nielsen and R. L. Mack, Eds., pp. 25–61, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  36. D. C. Wynn, D. F. Wyatt, S. M. T. Nair, and P. J. Clarkson, “An introduction to the Cambridge advanced modeler,” in Conf Proc of the International Conference on Modelling and Management of Engineering Processes, pp. 1–4, 2010.
  37. M. C. Lovett, L. M. Reder, and C. Lebiere, “Modeling working memory in a unified architecture: an ACT-R perspective,” in Models of Working Memory, A. Miyake and P. Shah, Eds., pp. 135–182, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  38. R. Hillestad, J. Bigelow, A. Bower et al., “Can electronic medical record systems transform health care? Potential health benefits, savings, and costs,” Health Affairs, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1103–1117, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  39. B. Kaplan and K. D. Harris-Salamone, “Health IT success and failure: Recommendations from literature and an AMIAWorkshop,” Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, vol. 16, pp. 291–299, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  40. S. I. MacKenzie, “Fitts' law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 7, pp. 91–139, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  41. S. C. Seow, “Information theoretic models of HCI: a comparison of the Hick-Hyman law and Fitts' law,” Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 20, pp. 315–352, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  42. W. Ding and X. Lin, Information Architecture: the Design and Integration of Information Spaces, Morgan Claypool, 2009.
  43. K. Kuqi, T. Eveleigh, T. Holzer, and S. Sarkani, “Using design structure matrix for improving electronic medical record usability,” in Conf Proc of IEEE International Systems Conference, pp. 1–6, 2012.
  44. W. O. Galitz, The Essential Guide To User Interface Design: An Introduction To GUI Design Principles and Techniques, John Wiley & Sons, Canada, 2nd edition, 2002.
  45. L. L. Constantine and L. A. Lockwood, Software for User: A Practical Guide to the Models and Methods of Usage-Centered Design, Addison Wesley, Reading, MA, 1999.