Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume 6 (2015), Issue 2, Pages 145-158
Research Article

A Computer-aided Method for Improving the Reliability of Lenke Classification for Scoliosis

Junhua Zhang,1 Hongjian Li,2 Liang Lv,3 Xinling Shi,1 Fei Guo,3 and Yufeng Zhang1

1Department of Electronic Engineering, Yunnan University, China
2Department of Orthopedics, China
3Department of Radiology, the First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Province, China

Received 1 September 2014; Accepted 1 March 2015

Copyright © 2015 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. A. F. Stokes, “Three-dimensional terminology of spinal deformity. A report presented to the Scoliosis Research Society by the Scoliosis Research Society Working Group on 3-D terminology of spinal deformity,” Spine, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 236–248, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  2. L. G. Lenke, R. R. Betz, J. Harms et al., “Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume, vol. 83-A, no. 8, pp. 1169–1181, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  3. H. A. King, J. H. Moe, D. S. Bradford, and R. B. Winter, “The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis,” The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - American Volume, vol. 65, no. 9, pp. 1302–1313, 1983. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. Ogon, K. Giesinger, H. Behensky et al., “Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of Lenke’s new scoliosis classification system,” Spine, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 858–863, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  5. B. S. Richards, D. J. Sucato, D. E. Konigsberg, and J. A. Ouellet, “Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured,” Spine, vol. 28, no. 11, pp. 1148–1157, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  6. P. Phan, N. Mezghani, C. E. Aubin, J. de Guise, and H. Labelle, “Computer algorithms and applications used to assist the evaluation and treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a review of published articles 2000-2009,” Eur Spine J, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1058–1068, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  7. I. A. F. Stokes and D. D. Aronsson, “Computer-assisted algorithms improve reliability of King classification and Cobb angle measurement of scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 665–670, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  8. I. A. F. Stokes and D. D. Aronsson, “Rule-based algorithm for automated King-type classification of idiopathic scoliosis,” Stud Health Technol Inform, vol. 88, pp. 149–152, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  9. I. A. F. Stokes and D. D. Aronsson, “Identifying sources of variability in scoliosis classification using a rule-based automated algorithm,” Spine, vol. 27, no. 24, pp. 2801–2805, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  10. P. Phan, N. Mezghani, E. K. Wai, J. de Guise, and H. Labelle, “Artificial neural networks assessing adolescent idiopathic scoliosis comparison with Lenke classification,” The Spine Journal, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 1527–1533, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  11. N. Mezghani, R. Chav, L. Humbert, S. Parent, W. Skalli, and J. de Guise, “A computer-based classifier of three-dimensional spinal scoliosis severity,” Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  12. P. Poncet, J. Dansereau, and H. Labelle, “Geometric Torsion in Idiopathic Scoliosis: Three-Dimensional Analysis and Proposal for a New Classification,” Spine, vol. 26, no. 20, pp. 2235–2243, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Phan, N. Mezghani, M. L. Nault et al., “A decision tree can increase accuracy when assessing curve types according to Lenke classification of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,” Spine, vol. 35, no. 10, pp. 1054–1059, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  14. N. Mezghani, P. Phan, H. Labelle, C. E. Aubin, and J. de Guise, “Computer-aided Lenke classification of scoliotic spines. World Academy of Science,” Engineering and Technology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 646–649, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Zhang, X. Shi, L. Lv, X. Wang, Y. Zhang, and F. Guo, “Computerized Lenke classification of scoliotic spine,” in Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, pp. 945–948, 2013.
  16. L. Duong, F. Cheriet, H. Labelle et al., “Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the identification of the Lenke classification lumbar modifier in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis,” J Spinal Disorders & Techniques, vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 448–455.
  17. L. Duong, F. Cheriet, and H. Labelle, “Three-Dimensional Classification of Spinal Deformities Using Fuzzy Clustering,” Spine, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 923–930, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  18. H. Lin, “Identification of spinal deformity classification with total curvature analysis and artificial neural network,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 376–382, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  19. H. Lin and D. Sucato, “Identification of Lenke spine deformity classification by simplified 3D spine model,” in Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc, vol. 5, pp. 3144–3146, 2004.
  20. A. P. Sangole, C. E. Aubin, H. Labelle et al., “Three-dimensional classification of thoracic scoliotic curves,” Spine, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 91–99.
  21. I. A. F. Stokes, A. P. Sangole, and C. E. Aubin, “Classification of scoliosis deformity three-dimensional spinal shape by cluster analysis,” Spine, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 584–590, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Zhang, E. Lou, X. Shi et al., “Computer-aided assessment of scoliosis on posteroanterior radiographs,” Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 185–195, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  23. J. Canny, “A computational approach to edge detection,” IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 679–714, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  24. J. R. Landis and G. G. Koch, “The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data,” Biometrics, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 159–174, 1977. View at Google Scholar