Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume 2017, Article ID 2634389, 7 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/2634389
Research Article

An Evaluation of the Benefits of Simultaneous Acquisition on PET/MR Coregistration in Head/Neck Imaging

IRCCS SDN, Naples, Italy

Correspondence should be addressed to Serena Monti; ti.ilopan-nds@itnoms

Received 24 February 2017; Revised 2 May 2017; Accepted 16 May 2017; Published 18 July 2017

Academic Editor: Pan Lin

Copyright © 2017 Serena Monti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Aiello, S. Monti, M. Inglese et al., “A multi-modal fusion scheme for the enhancement of PET/MR viewing,” EJNMMI Physics, vol. 2, 2015, Springer. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. Monti, S. Cocozza, P. Borrelli et al., “MAVEN: an algorithm for multi-parametric automated segmentation of brain veins from gradient echo acquisitions,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1054–1065, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. S. Monti, G. Palma, P. Borrelli et al., “A multiparametric and multiscale approach to automated segmentation of brain veins,” in 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), pp. 3041–3044, Milan, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. H. Zaidi and A. D. Guerra, “An outlook on future design of hybrid PET/MRI systems,” Medical Physics, vol. 38, no. 10, pp. 5667–5689, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Delso, S. Fürst, B. Jakoby et al., “Performance measurements of the Siemens mMR integrated whole-body PET/MR scanner,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 52, no. 12, pp. 1914–1922, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. G. Antoch and A. Bockisch, “Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging?” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 36, Supplement 1, pp. S113–S120, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  7. P. Veit-Haibach, F. P. Kuhn, F. Wiesinger, G. Delso, and G. von Schulthess, “PET–MR imaging using a tri-modality PET/CT–MR system with a dedicated shuttle in clinical routine,” Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 25–35, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. C. Buchbender, T. A. Heusner, T. C. Lauenstein, A. Bockisch, and G. Antoch, “Oncologic PET/MRI, part 1: tumors of the brain, head and neck, chest, abdomen, and pelvis,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 928–938, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. T. Kanda, K. Kitajima, Y. Suenaga et al., “Value of retrospective image fusion of 18F-FDG PET and MRI for preoperative staging of head and neck cancer: comparison with PET/CT and contrast-enhanced neck MRI,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 82, no. 11, pp. 2005–2010, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. J. Loeffelbein, M. Souvatzoglou, V. Wankerl et al., “PET-MRI fusion in head-and-neck oncology: current status and implications for hybrid PET/MRI,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 473–483, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. D. Loeffelbein, M. Souvatzoglou, V. Wankerl et al., “Diagnostic value of retrospective PET-MRI fusion in head-and-neck cancer,” BMC Cancer, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 846, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  12. S. Partovi, A. Kohan, C. Rubbert et al., “Clinical oncologic applications of PET/MRI: a new horizon,” American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 202, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  13. S. Leibfarth, D. Mönnich, S. Welz et al., “A strategy for multimodal deformable image registration to integrate PET/MR into radiotherapy treatment planning,” Acta Oncologica, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 1353–1359, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. L. Bridges, “Software fusion: an option never fully explored,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 834–836, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. D. Rueckert, L. I. Sonoda, C. Hayes, D. L. Hill, M. O. Leach, and D. J. Hawkes, “Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. 712–721, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. F. Maes, A. Collignon, D. Vandermeulen, G. Marchal, and P. Suetens, “Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 187–198, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. D. Mattes, D. R. Haynor, H. Vesselle, T. K. Lewellen, and W. Eubank, “PET-CT image registration in the chest using free-form deformations,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 120–128, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. V. Fortunati, R. F. Verhaart, F. Angeloni et al., “Feasibility of multimodal deformable registration for head and neck tumor treatment planning,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, and Physics, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 85–93, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Becker and H. Zaidi, “Imaging in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: the potential role of PET/MRI,” The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 87, no. 1036, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. Klein, M. Staring, K. Murphy, M. A. Viergever, and J. P. Pluim, “Elastix: a toolbox for intensity-based medical image registration,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 196–205, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. J. Gooding, C. L. Eccles, M. Fuss et al., “Assessing the quality of deformable CT-MR registration for the purpose of multimodal radiotherapy contouring,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, and Physics, vol. 81, no. 2, pp. S812–S813, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. S. Klein, U. A. van der Heide, I. M. Lips, M. van Vulpen, M. Staring, and J. P. Pluim, “Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information,” Medical Physics, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 1407–1417, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. S. Klein, J. P. Pluim, M. Staring, and M. A. Viergever, “Adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimisation for image registration,” International Journal of Computer Vision, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 227–239, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. W. M. Wells III, P. Viola, H. Atsumi, S. Nakajima, and R. Kikinis, “Multi-modal volume registration by maximization of mutual information,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–51, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. N. Toussaint, J.-C. Souplet, and P. Fillard, “MedINRIA: medical image navigation and research tool by INRIA,” in Proceedings of MICCAI Workshop on Interaction in Medical Image Analysis and Visualization, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. P. A. Yushkevich, J. Piven, H. C. Hazlett et al., “User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: significantly improved efficiency and reliability,” NeuroImage, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 1116–1128, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. L. Pace, E. Nicolai, A. Luongo et al., “Comparison of whole-body PET/CT and PET/MRI in breast cancer patients: lesion detection and quantitation of 18F-deoxyglucose uptake in lesions and in normal organ tissues,” European Journal of Radiology, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 289–296, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus