Review Article

Static Progressive Orthoses for Elbow Contracture: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Methodological quality ratings for each article.

ReferenceParent-Weiss and King 2006 [26]Doornberg et al. 2006 [25]McGrath et al. 2009 [27]Bhat et al. 2010 [9]Ulrich et al. 2010 [15]Marinelli et al. 2010 [12]R. Suksathien and Y. Suksathien 2010 [24]Liu et al. 2011 [28]

A clearly stated aim22222222
Inclusion of consecutive patients22222200
Prospective collection of data00000000
Endpoints appropriate to the aim of the study00202102
Unbiased assessment of the study endpoint00200000
Follow-up period appropriate to the aim of the study02020202
Loss to follow-up less than 5%00202220
Prospective calculation of the study size02200000
Total score481268946

MINORS (methodological index for nonrandomized studies) for 8 pre-post intervention design studies. The items are scored 0 (not reported), 1 (reported but inadequate), or 2 (reported and adequate).