Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Healthcare Engineering
Volume 2018, Article ID 6183468, 8 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6183468
Research Article

The Evolving Role of Information Technology in Haemovigilance Systems

1Instituto Português do Sangue e da Transplantação, IP, Rua de Bolama 133, 4200-139 Porto, Portugal
2Department of Computer Science, ESEI, University of Vigo, Campus Universitario As Lagoas, s/n, 32004 Ourense, Spain
3LuxConsulTrans, Banglamung, Thailand
4Centro de Investigaciones Biomédicas (CINBIO), University of Vigo, Campus Universitario Lagoas-Marcosende, 36310 Vigo, Spain
5Centre of Biological Engineering (CEB), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal

Correspondence should be addressed to Anália Lourenço; se.ogivu@ailana

Received 29 September 2017; Accepted 9 January 2018; Published 8 March 2018

Academic Editor: Reima Suomi

Copyright © 2018 Augusto Ramoa et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M.-P. Vo Mai, L. Fauveau, N. Ounnoughene, I. Sandid, and P. Renaudier, “Dix-sept ans d’hémovigilance en France : bilan, perspectives,” Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 140–150, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. Poles and on behalf of the Serious Hazards of Transfusion (SHOT) Steering Group, The 2016 Annual SHOT Report (2017), 2016, https://www.shotuk.org/wp-content/uploads/SHOT-Report-2016_web_11th-July.pdf.
  3. R. R. P. de Vries, J.-C. Faber, and P. F. W. Strengers, “Haemovigilance: an effective tool for improving transfusion practice,” Vox Sanguinis, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 60–67, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. J. Nel, “Clinical guidelines, audits and hemovigilance in managing blood transfusion needs,” Transfusion Alternatives in Transfusion Medicine, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 61–69, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. E. Brodheim, W. Ying, and R. L. Hirsch, “An evaluation of the CODABAR symbol in blood-banking automation,” Vox Sanguinis, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 175–180, 1980. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. I. R. Clark, J. Parekh, M. Peters, I. Frew, and R. N. Ibbotson, “Hospital blood bank laboratory data processing system,” Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1157–1166, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Sharma, A. V. Parwani, J. S. Raval, D. J. Triulzi, R. J. Benjamin, and L. Pantanowitz, “Contemporary issues in transfusion medicine informatics,” Journal of Pathology Informatics, vol. 2, no. 1, p. 3, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. Sampson, R. Nozick, P. Ashford et al., “ISBT guidelines for validation of automated systems in blood establishments,” Vox Sanguinis, vol. 98, pp. 1–19, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Ashford, D. Gozzard, J. Jones et al., “Guidelines for blood bank computing,” Transfusion Medicine, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 307–314, 2000, Available from:. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) C of, Guide to the Preparation, Use and Quality Assurance of Blood Components, Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 19th edition, 2017.
  11. European Parliament C of the EU, Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 Setting Standards of Quality and Safety for the Collection, Testing, Processing, Storage and Distribution of Human Blood and Blood Components and Amending Directive 2001, pp. 30–40, 2003, https://ec.europa.eu/health//sites/health/files/files/eudralex/vol-1/dir_2002_98/dir_2002_98_en.pdf.
  12. Commission E, Commission Directive 2005/62/EC of 30 September 2005 Implementing Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards Community Standards and Specifications Relating to a Quality System for Blood Establishments, pp. 41–48, 2005.
  13. European Commission, Commission Directive 2005/61/EC of 30 September 2005 Implementing Directive 2002/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council as Regards Traceability Requirements and Notification of Serious Adverse Reactions and Events, pp. 32–40, 2005, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32005L0061&from=EN.
  14. J. C. Faber, “Haemovigilance in Europe: the European haemovigilance network,” Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 285–290, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J.-C. Faber, “Work of the European Haemovigilance Network (EHN),” Transfusion Clinique et Biologique, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 2–10, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. C. Politis, J. C. Wiersum, C. Richardson et al., “The International Haemovigilance Network database for the surveillance of adverse reactions and events in donors and recipients of blood components: technical issues and results,” Vox Sanguinis, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 409–417, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Robillard, K. I. Nawej, and K. Jochem, “The Quebec hemovigilance system: description and results from the first two years,” Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 111–122, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. D. M. Mota, D. R. Freitas, and W. N. Araújo, “Evaluation of the system of sanitary vigilance of blood at the federal level, Brazil, 2007,” Ciencia & Saude Coletiva, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 191–202, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. T. Vuk, M. Barišić, T. Očić, I. Mihaljević, D. Šarlija, and I. Jukić, “Error management in blood establishments: results of eight years of experience (2003-2010) at the Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine,” Blood Transfusion, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 311–320, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. D. Rebibo, L. Hauser, A. Slimani, P. Hervé, and G. Andreu, “The French haemovigilance system: organization and results for 2003,” Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 145–153, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. D. Lundy, S. Laspina, H. Kaplan, B. Rabin Fastman, and E. Lawlor, “Seven hundred and fifty-nine (759) chances to learn: a 3-year pilot project to analyse transfusion-related near-miss events in the Republic of Ireland,” Vox Sanguinis, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 233–241, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. A. Giampaolo, V. Piccinini, L. Catalano, F. Abbonizio, and H. J. Hassan, “The first data from the haemovigilance system in Italy,” Blood Transfusion, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 66–74, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. J. C. Wiersum-Osselton and M. R. Schipperus, “Transfusion reactions in patients: haemovigilance reports to the Dutch National Haemovigilance Office in 2003,” Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd, vol. 149, no. 47, pp. 2622–2627, 2005, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/. View at Google Scholar
  24. C. T. Steinsvåg, A. Espinosa, and Ø. Flesland, “Eight years with haemovigilance in Norway. What have we learnt?” Transfusion and Apheresis Science, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 548–552, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. F. Murphy, “Surveillance of transfusion errors: putting data to use in the U.K,” Developments in Biological, vol. 120, pp. 179–187, 2005, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16050172. View at Google Scholar
  26. S. L. Sime, “Strengthening the service continuum between transfusion providers and suppliers: enhancing the blood services network,” Transfusion, vol. 45, no. s4, pp. 206S–223S, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus