Research Article
Simultaneous Functional and Morphological Assessment of Left Atrial Appendage by 3D Virtual Models
Table 1
Comparison between measurements performed by 2D-S and 3D-S methods.
| | LAA parameter | 3D-S | 2D-S |
| | Diastolic ostium area (cm2) | 4.54 ± 1.80 | 4.77 ± 1.53 | | Systolic ostium area (cm2) | 3.58 ± 1.82 | 3.79 ± 1.69 | | Diastolic LAA volume (cm3) | 10.26 ± 5.25 | 10.55 ± 4.88 | | Systolic LAA volume (cm3) | 7.39 ± 3.35 | 7.46 ± 4.71 | | Normalized diastolic ostium area (cm2/m2) | 2.63 ± 1.22 | 2.76 ± 1.08 | | Normalized systolic ostium area (cm2/m2) | 2.07 ± 1.15 | 2.20 ± 1.09 | | Normalized diastolic LAA volume (cm3/m2) | 5.98 ± 3.71 | 6.19 ± 3.63 | | Normalized systolic LAA volume (cm3/m2) | 4.32 ± 3.35 | 4.38 ± 3.27 | | EFLAA | 32.19 ± 17.83 | 32.76 ± 16.46 |
|
|
EFLAA: LAA ejection fraction. No significant difference was found for all measurements.
|
