Research Article
[Retracted] A Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of Video Laryngoscopy versus Laryngoscopy for Emergency Orotracheal Intubation
Table 1
Characteristics of studies.
| Studies | Characteristics | [7] | [13] | [14] | [15] | [16] | [17] |
| Country of study | USA | USA | France | USA | France | Israel |
| Study type | Propensity matched analysis | Randomized clinical trial | Observational | Observational | Randomized clinical trial | Randomized clinical trial |
| Hospital setting | Intensive care unit | Intensive care unit | Intensive care unit | Intensive care unit | Intensive care unit | Intensive care unit |
| Intubation type | Emergency intubations | Emergency intubations | Emergency intubations | Emergency intubations | Emergency intubations | Emergency intubations |
| Video laryngoscopy type | Multiple | McGRATH/GlideScope/Olympus | McGRATHMAC | GlideScope | McGRATHMAC | GlideScope |
| Medical experts | 6 doctors (postgraduate) | Pulmonary experts and critical care supervised by physicians | ICU physicians and anesthetists | Pulmonary critical care experts and intensive care unit | ICU physicians | Pulmonary and critical care experts |
| Age, yrs (VL) | 59 (49–69) | 59 (49–68) | 63 (55–70) | 66 ± 16.96 | 62.7 (15.3) | 65.4 |
| Age, yrs (DL) | 60 (53–73) | 60 (51–67) | 59 (49–69) | 69 ± 16.88 | 62.8 (16.3) | 69.6 |
| Total number | 809 | 150 | 210 | 392 | 371 | 153 |
|
|