Table of Contents
Journal of Industrial Engineering
Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 128542, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/128542
Research Article

A Multiobjective Iterated Greedy Algorithm for Truck Scheduling in Cross-Dock Problems

1Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Kharazmi, Karaj, Iran
2Department of Industrial Engineering, Islamic Azad University, South Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran

Received 27 January 2014; Accepted 8 April 2014; Published 8 May 2014

Academic Editor: Wen-Chiung Lee

Copyright © 2014 B. Naderi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. W. Yu and P. J. Egbelu, “Scheduling of inbound and outbound trucks in cross docking systems with temporary storage,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 377–396, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. A. Boloori Arabani, M. Zandieh, and S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi, “A cross-docking scheduling problem with sub-population multi-objective algorithms,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 58, no. 5–8, pp. 741–761, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. Boloori Arabani, M. Zandieh, and S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi, “Multi-objective genetic-based algorithms for a cross-docking scheduling problem,” Applied Soft Computing Journal, vol. 11, no. 8, pp. 4954–4970, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. W. Yu, Operational strategies for cross docking systems [Ph.D. dissertation], Iowa State University, 2002.
  5. A. R. Boloori Arabani, S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi, and M. Zandieh, “Meta-heuristics implementation for scheduling of trucks in a cross-docking system with temporary storage,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1964–1979, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. B. Vahdani and M. Zandieh, “Scheduling trucks in cross-docking systems: robust meta-heuristics,” Computers and Industrial Engineering, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 12–24, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. R. Boloori Arabani, S. M. T. Fatemi Ghomi, and M. Zandieh, “A multi-criteria cross-docking scheduling with just-in-time approach,” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 49, no. 5–8, pp. 741–756, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. Ruiz and T. Stützle, “A simple and effective iterated greedy algorithm for the permutation flowshop scheduling problem,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 2033–2049, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. J. M. Framinan and R. Leisten, “A multi-objective iterated greedy search for flowshop scheduling with makespan and flowtime criteria,” OR Spectrum, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 787–804, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Minella, R. Ruiz, and M. Ciavotta, “Restarted Iterated Pareto Greedy algorithm for multi-objective flowshop scheduling problems,” Computers and Operations Research, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 1521–1533, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. J. Knowles, L. Thiele, and E. Zitzler, “A tutorial on the performance assessment of stochastic multi-objective optimizers,” Tech. Rep. 214, revised version, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory (TIK), ETH, Zurich, Switzerland, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Deb, A. Pratap, S. Agarwal, and T. Meyarivan, “A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 182–197, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Zitzler, J. Knowles, and L. Thiele, “Quality assessment of Pareto set approximations,” in Multi-Objective Optimization: Interactive and Evolutionary Approaches, pp. 373–404, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  14. E. Zitzler and L. Thiele, “Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 257–271, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, C. M. Fonseca, and V. G. Da Fonseca, “Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review,” IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 117–132, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus