Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Clinical and Developmental Immunology
Volume 11 (2004), Issue 2, Pages 129-133

Serial Analysis of Antimitochondrial Antibody in Patients with Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

1Department of Medicine, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, NJ, USA
2Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
3Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
4Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of California at Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, CA, USA

Copyright © 2004 Hindawi Publishing Corporation. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMAs) are the classic serologic marker in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). However, there have been only limited attempts to study changes in titer or isotype analysis of such AMAs in patients followed for long periods of time

We took advantage of stored sera from well-characterized patients with PBC followed for a period of 7-28 years (mean duration of 13.5 years). Immunoblot and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays were performed against PDC-E2, BCOADC-E2 and OGDC-E2 as well as isotype analysis of antigen-specific IgG, IgA and IgM antibodies against each of these mitochondrial autoantigens. Sera were analyzed for total IgG, IgA and IgM by radial immunodiffusion. The sera titer of AMAs was significantly higher in younger patients with PBC. Indeed, age of onset of clinical PBC was a significant predictor for the highest values of sera AMAs. In contrast, the AMA titer did not significantly change over time in this prolonged longitudinal study. The total sera levels of the individual immunoglobulins did not show a time-dependent change, when based on age of onset of the disease. Higher titers of AMAs were noted in the younger patients. Furthermore, despite this long follow-up, there was no evidence for a significant change in AMA levels; also, levels were not influenced by drug therapy used during the period of observation.