Identification of RD5-Encoded <i>Mycobacterium tuberculosis</i> Proteins As B-Cell Antigens Used for Serodiagnosis of Tuberculosis

Zhang, Miao-Miao; Zhao, Jun-Wei; Sun, Zhan-Qiang; Liu, Jun; Guo, Xiao-Kui; Liu, Wen-Di; Zhang, Shu-Lin

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/738043

Journal of Immunology Research

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 | Article ID 738043 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/738043

Identification of RD5-Encoded Mycobacterium tuberculosis Proteins As B-Cell Antigens Used for Serodiagnosis of Tuberculosis

Miao-Miao Zhang,^1,2Jun-Wei Zhao,¹Zhan-Qiang Sun,³Jun Liu,⁴Xiao-Kui Guo,¹Wen-Di Liu,^2,5and Shu-Lin Zhang^1,5

Academic Editor: Mario Clerici

Received31 Dec 2011

Accepted01 Apr 2012

Published04 Jun 2012

Abstract

Comparative genomic studies have identified several Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific genomic regions of difference (RDs) which are absent in the vaccine strains of Mycobacterium bovis BCG and which may be useful in the specific diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB). In this study, all encoded proteins from DNA segment RD5 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, that is, Rv3117–Rv3121, were recombined and evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for antibody reactivity with sera from HIV-negative pulmonary TB patients () and healthy controls (). The results identified two immunodominant antigens, that is, Rv3117 and Rv3120, both of which revealed a statistically significant antigenic distinction between healthy controls and TB patients (). In comparison with the well-known early-secreted antigen target 6 kDa (ESAT-6) (sensitivity 21.7%, specificity 90.6%), the higher detection sensitivity and higher specificity were achieved (Rv3117: sensitivity 25%, specificity 96.9%; Rv3120: sensitivity 31.7%, specificity 96.9%). Thus, the results highlight the immunosensitive and immunospecific nature of Rv3117 and Rv3120 and indicate promise for their use in the serodiagnosis of TB.

1. Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis) and is still a serious global health care problem. In 2010, there were 8.8 million incident cases of TB with 1.45 million deaths [1]. Over the past two decades, drug-resistant TB [2] and TB/HIV coinfection [3] further threatened to undermine tuberculosis control. Until now, there is no simple, rapid, sensitive, and specific test that can be used for diagnosis of tuberculosis. The gold standard for TB diagnosis is the demonstration of M. tuberculosis in various body fluids. However, this is often impossible due to the paucibacillary nature of the illness in some cases, especially in smear-negative TB patients. Currently, diagnosis of TB relies mainly on clinical examination and radiographical findings and is further confirmed by bacterial culture and acid-fast bacilli (AFB) smear microscopy [4]. However, it requires long time, and it is also not very sensitive; sometimes other mycobacteria found in sputum [5] may decrease the specificity. In recent years several rapid diagnostic techniques have been investigated to determine their ability to improve the diagnosis of TB, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and other methods for amplifying DNA and RNA, though they permit the diagnosis of tuberculosis in as little as several hours, their applicability is limited by low sensitivity, high level of training required, and high cost [6, 7].

In search for rapid and cost-effective diagnostic methods for TB, immunodiagnosis is considered an attractive option, which uses the specific humoral and cellular immune responses of the host to infer the presence of infection or disease. Recently, the antigen-specific ex vivo induction of interferon gamma (IFN-γ) had been used to detect infection with M. tuberculosis. However, the IFN-γ release assay could not differentiate the latent tuberculosis infection and active tuberculosis efficiently and cannot be recommended for the diagnosis of tuberculosis in developing countries, as large proportions of the populations in such countries are likely to harbor latent infection with M. tuberculosis [8–10]. Historically speaking, serology for the diagnosis of TB has been explored since 1898, when crude cell preparations containing carbohydrates, lipids, and proteins from M. tuberculosis or M. bovis BCG were used as antigen preparations showing high sensitivity but low specificity [11]. Modern developments in the purification of antigens, generation of monoclonal antibodies and chromatographic techniques, have led to a considerable improvement in specificity [12–18]. Serology has additional advantages in situations when the patient is unable to produce adequate sputum or sputum smear results are negative and TB is extrapulmonary.

Comparative genomic studies have identified several M. tuberculosis-specific genomic regions of difference (RDs) which are absent in the avirulent M. bovis Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) strains [19, 20] and which may be useful in the specific diagnosis of TB. For example, ESAT-6, culture filtrate protein 10 kDa (CFP-10) [16, 17], Rv3872 [21], and Rv3873 [22] from RD1 were identified as promising diagnostic antigens. Previous studies had also described a protein antigen Rv3425, which was encoded by an open reading frame (ORF) found in RD11 of M. tuberculosis and had a strong immunogenicity, suggesting it was a potential candidate for the serodiagnosis of active TB [12, 23]. In this study, we cloned, expressed, and purified the RD5-encoded M. tuberculosis recombinant proteins and evaluated the immunoreactivity of the target proteins with sera from HIV-negative pulmonary TB patients and healthy controls, respectively. We aimed at revealing other serological antigens to improve serodiagnostic sensitivity for TB.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Genomic DNA Extraction. M. tuberculosis

H₃₇Rv was cultured on the Lowenstein-Jensen medium at 37°C for four weeks, and the bacteria (2 mg) were heat-killed at 95°C for 1 h and then treated with 2 mg lysozyme in 1 mL TE buffer at 37°C for 2 h. Subsequently, the cells were subjected to 1% SDS and 50 μg/mL protease K treatments at 55°C for 2 h. The contained DNA was extracted with phenol and chloroform and precipitated with ethanol and 3 mol/L sodium acetate (pH 5.2), followed by being dissolved in TE buffer and stored at −20°C.

2.2. Generation of Recombined RD5-Encoded M. tuberculosis Proteins

The ORFs corresponding to Rv3117, Rv3118, Rv3119, Rv3120, and Rv3121 were amplified by PCR from the genomic DNA of H₃₇Rv, respectively. The primers, restriction endonucleases used, vectors, and annealing temperature for thermal cycle amplification are shown in Table 1. The PCR products were cloned into N-terminal or C-terminal His-tagged expression vector pET-21a, pET-32a, or pET-28b (Novagen, CA, USA) at the restriction sites indicated, and the generated recombinant plasmids were transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS for expression. After DNA sequencing, individual transformant was cultured overnight in LB medium containing 50 μg/mL kanamycin or ampicillin, and then the target proteins were induced with 1–50 mmol/L isopropyl-b-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) for 3 h. The recombinant proteins were purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC) according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Bio-Rad Laboratories Ltd., Shanghai, China). Finally, the recombinant protein purity and content were assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) analysis and Bradford’s assay using bovine serum albumin (BSA) as the protein standard [24], respectively.

2.3. Serum Samples

A total of 60 serum samples () from HIV-seronegative active TB patients (age range, 1–81 years) and 32 serum samples () from healthy control subjects (age range, 20–63 years) were collected from the Wuxi No. 5 people's hospital, Jiangsu, China. Active TB patients were diagnosed as previously [25] and were further classified into two groups: (i) smear-positive for acid-fast bacilli (AFB) and culture-positive pulmonary TB () and (ii) smear-negative culture-positive pulmonary TB (). All of health controls had not previously suffered from TB and had negative chest X-rays and negative sputum culture results for M. tuberculosis. Twelve of these were PPD positive at the time the serum samples were taken. All patients had not yet been started with antituberculous chemotherapy when the serum samples were taken. Sera were stored at −20°C.

2.4. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays (ELISAs)

ELISAs were performed to check the B-cell immune response in humans to RD5-encoded M. tuberculosis recombinant proteins and to the well-known antigen ESAT-6 as our previous studies [26, 27]. In brief, 96-well polystyrene flat-bottomed microtiter plates (Costar, USA) were coated with 2–16 μg/mL of either RD5-encoded recombinant proteins or control antigen (Linc-Bio Science Co. LTD, Shanghai, China), incubated overnight at 4°C, washed four times with PBST wash buffer (Tween-20 0.05% v/v in PBS), and blocked with 300 μL of blocking buffer (bovine serum albumin 2% w/v in phosphate-buffered saline) for 2 h at 37°C. The plates were then washed four times with PBST wash buffer. 50-fold diluted serums (50 μL) in blocking buffer were then added to antigen-coated wells and incubated for 1 h at 37°C. All the samples were tested in duplicate. The plates were thoroughly washed with PBST and then incubated with a 1 : 5000 dilution of anti-human IgG-horseradish peroxidase (Sigma, Poole, UK) at 37°C for 1 h. Then, the plates were thoroughly washed again four times, followed by the addition of 100 μL of TMB substrate solution (0.04% TMB, 0.04% urea peroxide in 0.1 M sodium acetate-citric acid buffer, pH 4.0). After 10 min incubation in the dark at room temperature, the reaction was stopped by the addition of 50 μL of 2 M H₂SO₄ to each well, and the values of the optical density at 450 nm (OD₄₅₀) were measured with a microtiter plate reader (Bio-Rad, USA).

2.5. Statistical Analysis

The ELISA results were analyzed using cut-off values equal to the mean OD value for the healthy control serum samples plus three standard deviations (SDs). Any sample exhibiting absorbance above the cut-off value was considered to be positive. Sensitivity was determined by dividing the number of positive cases by the total number of TB patients. Specificity was determined by dividing the number of negative controls by the total number of healthy controls. For statistical analysis, the differences between different TB patients and healthy controls were calculated by the one-way ANOVA and independent-sample -test using the Statistics Package for Social Science 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), with considered to be significant. Furthermore, the receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves of the OD values for antibody responses to each RD5-encoded recombinant proteins were plotted using the SPSS17.0 software; the areas of under the curve (AUC) were calculated, accordingly.

3. Results

3.1. Expression and Purification of RD5-Encoded Recombinant Proteins

To evaluate the antigenic ability of RD5-encoded recombinant proteins, the corresponding genes were expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) PLysS and purified as a His-tag fusion protein. The Rv3117, Rv3118, and Rv3119 recombinant proteins were largely present in the soluble fraction, and purification of them was carried out under non-denaturing conditions without urea. However, the Rv3120 and Rv3121 recombinant proteins were largely present in the insoluble fraction, and therefore the purification was carried out under denaturing conditions in the presence of 6 M urea, with a yield of 6.5 mg of protein/L of culture. The overexpressed N-terminal or C-terminal His-tagged recombinant proteins from RD5 genes were purified and confirmed by SDS-PAGE analysis (Figure 1). Then, they were dialyzed overnight against 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, containing 100 mM NaCl and glycerol 3% (v/v) and used for immunoreactivity analyses.

3.2. Immunoreactivity Analyses of RD5-Encoded Recombinant Proteins

The serum IgG antibody responses to the RD5-encoded recombinant proteins or ESAT-6 antigen were compared with TB patients and healthy controls by ELISAs. Antibody responses to the individual protein in TB patients were analyzed with cut-off values obtained from 32 healthy individuals. As shown in Table 2, the sensitivity for detecting antibody responses to ESAT-6, Rv3117, Rv3118, Rv3119, Rv3120, and Rv3121 was 21.7%, 25.0%, 11.7%, 11.7%, 31.7%, and 5.0%, respectively, and the specificity was 90.6%, 96.9%, 90.6%, 96.9%, 96.9%, and 87.5%, respectively. Most importantly, the sensitivity and specificity of antibody detection by Rv3117 and Rv3120 were higher than those of antibody detection by ESAT-6 antigen. By combining the reactivity with recombinant proteins Rv3117 and Rv3120, a total test sensitivity of 35.0% for active TB patients was achieved, while good specificity (96.9%) still remained (Table 2).

Furthermore, all the OD₄₅₀ values of antibodies against RD5-encoded recombinant proteins and ESAT-6 antigen were used for the generation of ROC curves. The AUC of ESAT-6 antigen is 0.680 and those of Rv3117–Rv3121 recombinant proteins were 0.757, 0.656, 0.632, 0.735, and 0.609, respectively (figure not shown), suggesting Rv3117 and Rv3120 have a better overall diagnostic performance than any other individual antigen. In the study, all the TB patients compared with the healthy controls showed statistically significant responses against recombinant Rv3117 (), Rv3118 (), Rv3119 (), and Rv3120 proteins () other than Rv3121 () and ESAT-6 (). But antibody responses to EAST-6, Rv3117, Rv3118, Rv3119, Rv3120, and Rv3121 in the smear-positive TB patients were no stronger than that in the smear-negative TB patients () (Figure 2). Meanwhile, the sera from smear-positive TB also showed a statistically significant response against ESAT-6 antigen () compared with the healthy controls. However, the sera form the smear negative TB patients showed no statistically significant response against ESAT-6 antigen () compared with the healthy controls (data not shown). Apparently, characterization of antibodies against recombinant proteins Rv3117 and Rv3120 can effectively distinguish between TB patients and healthy controls.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

4. Discussion

The rapid screening test of active TB remains a serious problem in clinical practice, although it has been improved by the serodiagnostic methods [23]. These years, comparative genomic studies using subtractive DNA hybridization [19] and DNA microarray [20] have identified several M. tuberculosis-specific genomic regions of difference, designated RD1 to RD16, which are absent in the vaccine strains of M. bovis BCG, indicating that the RD-encoded recombinant proteins may be useful for improving the sensitivity and specificity of serodiagnosis TB. Accordingly, RD5 genes are present at M. tuberculosis but missed from BCG (BCG-Danish, BCG-pasteur, etc.) [20, 28]. Therefore, in this study, we successfully prepared five RD5-encoded recombinant proteins and evaluated by ELISA for their diagnostic potential in detecting serum antibodies comparison with ESAT-6 antigen which have been used for the diagnosis of TB [12, 14, 29] in a population of active TB patients and healthy controls.

Our results revealed that Rv3117 and Rv3120 were potential candidate antigens for the serodiagnosis of tuberculosis. The gene product of open reading frame Rv3117 of M. tuberculosis H₃₇Rv was annotated as encoding a probable rhodanese-like thiosulfate sulfurtransferase, and it may be involved in intermediary metabolism and respiration [30–32]. And Rv3120-encoded protein was annotated as a conserved hypothetical protein. It was illustrated that the intactness of the RD5 region might be associated with increased virulence of the organism [33]. In this study, the sensitivity of detecting antibody responses to single recombinant protein Rv3117 or Rv3120 in TB patients and healthy controls was higher than that to ESAT-6 antigen, suggesting that they may be valuable for the rapid diagnosis of TB (Table 2). Notably, we found that no single serum sample reacted with six proteins tested and no single protein was recognized by all sera. These findings further indicated the heterogeneous antibody responses in tuberculosis [34] and the importance of the research on TB antibody profile for improving serodiagnosis of tuberculosis [35, 36], for any single M. tuberculosis antigen is not enough to be used to cover the antibody profiles of TB patients, but combinations of antigens may yield improved level of sensitivity, without affecting specificity. Since negligible anti-Rv3117 and anti-Rv3120 responses were obtained in the healthy controls; it was likely that they were expressed during the course of M. tuberculosis infection and that they may be associated with disease manifestation and progression. Our results also revealed that the specificity of Rv3117 and Rv3120 in healthy controls was higher than that of ESAT-6 antigen (Table 2). They both revealed a statistically significant antigenic distinction between healthy controls and TB patients () (Figure 2). Therefore, the Rv3117 and Rv3120 recombinant proteins may be used for diagnosis of M. tuberculosis infection.

However, in a recent study, a total of 72 synthetic peptides covering the sequences of five RD5-encoded proteins had been tested by ELISAs for antibody reactivity with sera from HIV-negative pulmonary TB patients () and M. bovis BCG-vaccinated healthy subjects (), but the pooled peptides were not strongly reactive with TB sera [37]. On the other hand, by using pools of overlapping synthetic peptides covering the sequence of RD5-encoded proteins, the CMI responses have been determined, the INF-γ data showed that the 11% responses in pulmonary tuberculosis patients and 2% responses in healthy blood donors, and the IL-10 data showed that the 33% responses in pulmonary tuberculosis patients and 17% responses in healthy blood donors, as discussed by Mustafa and Al-Attiyah [38]. Further studies are in progress to investigate the CMI response to recombinant protein Rv3117 and Rv3120, with the aim of evaluating its use in the cellular immunity-based immunodiagnosis of TB. And it is interesting to speculate on the possible use of the Rv3117 and Rv3120 proteins with other immunodominant antigens for vaccine development.

5. Conclusion

In this study, we successfully recombined five RD5-encoded proteins and evaluated for their diagnostic potential in detecting serum antibodies comparison with ESAT-6 antigen with sera from HIV-negative pulmonary TB patients and healthy control subjects. The results identified two immunodominant antigens, that is, Rv3117 and Rv3120, which show promise for use in the serodiagnosis of M. tuberculosis. They both revealed a statistically significant antigenic distinction between healthy controls and TB patients.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the China Mega-Projects of Science Research for the 11th Five Year Plan (no. 2009ZX10004-313; no. 2009ZX10003-017) and the Doctor Innovation Fund of the Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (no. BXJ201204). M.-M. Zhang and J.-W. Zhao contributed equally to the work.

References

WHO, “Global tuberculosis control,” WHO Report, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Stokstad, “Infectious disease—drug-resistant TB on the rise,” Science, vol. 287, no. 5462, p. 2391, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Koenig, “Drug-resistant tuberculosis—in South Africa, XDR TB and HIV prove a deadly combination,” Science, vol. 319, no. 5865, pp. 894–897, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. L. Kasper, E. Braunwald, A. S. Fauci et al., Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine, McGraw-Hill Companies, New York, NY, USA, 16th edition, 2005.
Z. Y. Zhang, Z. Q. Sun, Z. L. Wang et al., “Complete genome sequence of a novel clinical isolate, the Nontuberculous mycobacterium strain JDM601,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 193, no. 16, pp. 4300–4301, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Bergmann, W. E. Keating, and G. L. Woods, “Clinical evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET System for rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 863–865, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Mazzarelli, L. Rindi, P. Piccoli, C. Scarparo, C. Garzelli, and E. Tortoli, “Evaluation of the BDProbeTec ET system for direct detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in pulmonary and extrapulmonary samples: a multicenter study,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 1779–1782, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Sester, G. Sotgiu, C. Lange et al., “Interferon-γ release assays for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 100–111, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. B. E. Chee, T. M. S. Barkham, K. W. KhinMar, S. H. Gan, and Y. T. Wang, “Quantitative T-cell interferon-gamma responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens in active and latent tuberculosis,” European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 667–670, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Janssens, P. Roux-Lombard, T. Perneger, M. Metzger, R. Vivien, and T. Rochat, “Quantitative scoring of an interferon-γ assay for differentiating active from latent tuberculosis,” European Respiratory Journal, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 722–727, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Aloring, “Agglutination du bacilli de la tuberculose vraie,” Comptes Rendus de l'Académie des Sciences, vol. 126, pp. 1398–1400, 1898.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Zhang, J. Wang, J. Lei et al., “PPE protein (Rv3425) from DNA segment RD11 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a potential B-cell antigen used for serological diagnosis to distinguish vaccinated controls from tuberculosis patients,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 139–145, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Khan, K. Alam, S. Nair, V. L. Valluri, K. J. R. Murthy, and S. Mukhopadhyay, “Association of strong immune responses to PPE protein Rv1168c with active tuberculosis,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 974–980, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Rosenkrands, C. Aagaard, K. Weldingh et al., “Identification of Rv0222 from RD4 as a novel serodiagnostic target for tuberculosis,” Tuberculosis, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 335–343, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. K. Choudhary, S. Mukhopadhyay, P. Chakhaiyar et al., “PPE antigen Rv2430c of Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces a strong B-cell response,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 6338–6343, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. S. Jackett, G. H. Bothamley, H. V. Batra, A. Mistry, D. B. Young, and J. Ivanyi, “Specificity of antibodies to immunodominant mycobacterial antigens in pulmonary tuberculosis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 2313–2318, 1988.
View at: Google Scholar
B. Brust, M. Lecoufle, E. Tuaillon et al., “Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipolytic enzymes as potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of active tuberculosis,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 9, Article ID e25078, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
J.-W. Zhao, Z.-Q. Sun, H.-G. Yang et al., “Cloning, expression and immunological evaluation of a short fragment from Rv3391 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 345–353, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. G. Mahairas, P. J. Sabo, M. J. Hickey, D. C. Singh, and C. K. Stover, “Molecular analysis of genetic differences between Mycobacterium bovis BCG and virulent M. bovis,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 1274–1282, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
M. A. Behr, M. A. Wilson, W. P. Gill et al., “Comparative genomics of BCG vaccines by whole-genome DNA microarray,” Science, vol. 284, no. 5419, pp. 1520–1523, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Mukherjee, M. Dutta, P. Datta et al., “The RD1-encoded antigen Rv3872 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis as a potential candidate for serodiagnosis of tuberculosis,” Clinical Microbiology and Infection, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 146–152, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. N. Brusasca, R. Colangeli, K. P. Lyashchenko et al., “Immunological characterization of antigens encoded by the RD1 region of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 54, no. 5, pp. 448–452, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Zhang, J. W. Zhao, Z. Q. Sun et al., “Development and evaluation of a novel multiple-antigen ELISA for serodiagnosis of tuberculosis,” Tuberculosis, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 278–284, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Davidow, G. V. Kanaujia, L. Shi et al., “Antibody profiles characteristic of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection state,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 10, pp. 6846–6851, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Zhang, J. W. Zhao, Z. Q. Sun et al., “Development and evaluation of a novel multiple-antigen ELISA for serodiagnosis of tuberculosis,” Tuberculosis, vol. 89, no. 4, pp. 278–284, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Zhao, Z. Q. Sun, H. G. Yang et al., “Cloning, expression and immunological evaluation of a short fragment from Rv3391 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Annals of Microbiology, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 345–353, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Cheng, J. W. Zhao, Z. Q. Sun et al., “Evaluation of a novel fusion protein antigen for rapid serodiagnosis of tuberculosis,” Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 344–349, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
O. Parkash, B. P. Singh, and M. Pai, “Regions of differences encoded antigens as targets for immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis in humans,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 345–357, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Lyashchenko, R. Colangeli, M. Houde, H. Al Jahdali, D. Menzies, and M. L. Gennaro, “Heterogeneous antibody responses in tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 3936–3940, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Song, R. Sandie, Y. Wang, M. A. Andrade-Navarro, and M. Niederweis, “Identification of outer membrane proteins of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Tuberculosis, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 526–544, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Krawczyk, T. A. Kohl, A. Goesmann, J. Kalinowski, and J. Baumbach, “From Corynebacterium glutamicum to Mycobacterium tuberculosis—towards transfers of gene regulatory networks and integrated data analyses with MycoRegNet,” Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 37, no. 14, article e97, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Wolfe, S. B. Mahaffey, N. A. Kruh, and K. M. Dobos, “Proteomic definition of the cell wall of Mycobacterium tuberculosis,” Journal of Proteome Research, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 5816–5826, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. R. Rao, F. Kauser, S. Srinivas et al., “Analysis of genomic downsizing on the basis of region-of-difference polymorphism profiling of Mycobacterium tuberculosis patient isolates reveals geographic partitioning,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 5978–5982, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Lyashchenko, R. Colangeli, M. Houde, H. Al Jahdali, D. Menzies, and M. L. Gennaro, “Heterogeneous antibody responses in tuberculosis,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 3936–3940, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Kunnath-Velayudhan, H. Salamon, H. Y. Wang et al., “Dynamic antibody responses to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 33, pp. 14703–14708, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Sartain, R. A. Slayden, K. K. Singh, S. Laal, and J. T. Belisle, “Disease state differentiation and identification of tuberculosis biomarkers via native antigen array profiling,” Molecular and Cellular Proteomics, vol. 5, no. 11, pp. 2102–2113, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Y. Al-Khodari, R. Al-Attiyah, and A. S. Mustafa, “Identification, diagnostic potential, and natural expression of immunodominant seroreactive peptides encoded by five Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific genomic regions,” Clinical and Vaccine Immunology, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 477–482, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. S. Mustafa and R. Al-Attiyah, “Identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific genomic regions encoding antigens inducing protective cellular immune responses,” Indian Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 498–504, 2009.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2012 Miao-Miao Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1491

Downloads

2031

Citations