Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2013 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2013 |Article ID 526860 |

Wycliffe Omurwa Masanta, Markus M. Heimesaat, Stefan Bereswill, Abdul Malik Tareen, Raimond Lugert, Uwe Groß, Andreas E. Zautner, "Modification of Intestinal Microbiota and Its Consequences for Innate Immune Response in the Pathogenesis of Campylobacteriosis", Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2013, Article ID 526860, 10 pages, 2013.

Modification of Intestinal Microbiota and Its Consequences for Innate Immune Response in the Pathogenesis of Campylobacteriosis

Academic Editor: Bartholomew Akanmori
Received22 Jun 2013
Revised01 Oct 2013
Accepted08 Oct 2013
Published14 Nov 2013


Campylobacter jejuni is the leading cause of bacterial food-borne gastroenteritis in the world, and thus one of the most important public health concerns. The initial stage in its pathogenesis after ingestion is to overcome colonization resistance that is maintained by the human intestinal microbiota. But how it overcomes colonization resistance is unknown. Recently developed humanized gnotobiotic mouse models have provided deeper insights into this initial stage and host’s immune response. These studies have found that a fat-rich diet modifies the composition of the conventional intestinal microbiota by increasing the Firmicutes and Proteobacteria loads while reducing the Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes loads creating an imbalance that exposes the intestinal epithelial cells to adherence. Upon adherence, deoxycholic acid stimulates C. jejuni to synthesize Campylobacter invasion antigens, which invade the epithelial cells. In response, NF-κB triggers the maturation of dendritic cells. Chemokines produced by the activated dendritic cells initiate the clearance of C. jejuni cells by inducing the actions of neutrophils, B-lymphocytes, and various subsets of T-cells. This immune response causes inflammation. This review focuses on the progress that has been made on understanding the relationship between intestinal microbiota shift, establishment of C. jejuni infection, and consequent immune response.

1. Introduction

Campylobacter jejuni is a Gram-negative, spiral-shaped, nonspore forming, and highly motile bacterium that grows optimally under microaerophilic conditions at 42°C. The genome of C. jejuni is roughly 1.6 to 1.7 Mbp with a G+C ratio of approximately 31% [1]. C. jejuni has a wide spectrum of hosts ranging from wild birds, chicken, and turkey to mammals such as cattle, swine, sheep, and humans and can also be found in milk, meat, and stock water.

C. jejuni is a highly prevalent commensal bacterium in all its hosts except for humans causing a bacterial food-borne illness known as campylobacteriosis. Campylobacteriosis has been found to be a usually self-limiting disease that is characterized by symptoms such as fever, abdominal cramps, bloody diarrhea, dizziness, and myalgia. However, in rare cases campylobacteriosis may lead to postinfectious complications like the Guillain-Barré syndrome (including the most severe form: the Miller-Fisher syndrome), reactive arthritis (Reiter’s syndrome), postinfectious irritable bowel syndrome, and potentially immunoproliferative small intestinal disease [2, 3]. Epidemiological studies have shown that the bacterium infects all age groups of different social-economic regions all over the world, resulting in characteristic diarrhea. In developed countries, the disease has a prevalence peak in young adults and is characterized by bloody diarrhea with mucus. On the other hand, in developing countries the disease mainly affects children below the age of five manifesting as watery diarrhea leading to exsiccosis and electrolyte loss [4]. The incidence of C. jejuni infection varies throughout the world but remains to be a major cause of diarrheal disease in both developed and developing countries. The major sources of human infections have been found to be consumption of cross-contaminated food, contaminated milk, milk products and water, consumption of undercooked chicken, pig, and beef as well as contact with a mammalian host (e.g., pets), wild-birds, chicken, and bird droppings [2].

During the course of infection the bacterium has to pass several obstacles and to survive in different environments. After ingestion of at least 500 viable bacteria [5], C. jejuni has to establish in the intestinal milieu, which is influential by host antibacterial mechanisms like secretion of bile acids into the intestines and the intestinal microbiota.

It is hypothesized that the prevailing conditions (individually or collectively) within the human digestive system stimulate C. jejuni to synthesize virulence-associated factors that are involved in the development of campylobacteriosis [6, 7]. To support this hypothesis, studies on the mechanisms facilitating colonization and survival of C. jejuni in the human gut as well as on adherence, entry, endurance, and replication of the pathogen in human epithelial cells have received a lot of attention in the past.

Nowadays, distinct factors involved in the disruption of physiological colonization resistance maintained by commensal intestinal bacteria [8], are of increasing interest.

2. Intestinal Microbiota and Colonization Resistance

2.1. Intestinal Microbiota

The human digestive tract houses a plethora of commensal microbial, fungal, and protozoan species as well as viruses that are collectively referred to as intestinal “microbiota”. The intestinal microbiota is composed of bacteria from different phyla, bacteriophages, and a single phylum of archaea, yeast, and filamentous fungi [9]. The different phyla of bacteria in the microbiota are consistent from childhood to adulthood but the species distribution is not constant due to various factors. Between the delivery time of a child and an age of 5 years, the intestinal microbiota is determined by mode of delivery, breast feeding and other types of feeding, gestational age, infant hospitalization, and antibiotic treatment(s) [10, 11]. During this stage of life, bacteria of the following genera are dominant: Bifidobacterium, Bacteroides, Lactobacillus, Escherichia, Klebsiella, and Clostridium. In adult age and in children above 6 years, the composition of intestinal microbiota is complex with bacterial genera varying considerably among individuals due to age, genetics, health status, geographical location, stress, antibiotic exposure, and diet [10, 12]. In spite of the existence of various factors that influence the composition of bacterial genera in the intestines among various adults, the following bacteria phyla, namely, Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Tenericutes, have been found to make up the adult intestinal microbiota with Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes being more dominant as compared to Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Fusobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Tenericutes [9, 13]. In addition to the bacterial species differences existing in microbiota of children ≤5 years, children >6 years, and adults, the bacterial loads in distinct regions of the intestinal tract vary considerably. For example, stomach and duodenum harbor a rather low jejunum and ileum a relatively intermediate and the distal colon by far the highest bacterial load within the gastrointestinal tract [14]. Importantly, the human host benefits from the intestinal microbiota by (i) fermentation of indigestible complex carbohydrates to absorbable short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), (ii) detoxification of potentially harmful substances such as bile acids and bilirubin, (iii) providing an important layer of defense against invasion by pathogenic microorganisms also known as colonization resistance, and (iv) playing an important role in the proper development of immune system (see [15, 16] for detailed reviews).

2.2. Colonization Resistance

Colonization resistance is a physiological phenomenon exerted by the commensal intestinal microbiota, which deter pathogens from causing infections. In 1950 Bohnhoff and coworkers observed that treating mice with antibiotics prior to Salmonella enterica infection resulted in reduction of pathogen loads required to cause S. enterica associated infection [17]. Since then several studies have been carried out to understand the underlying mechanisms of colonization resistance in humans. So far, murine in vivo studies revealed that intestinal microbiota accomplish colonization resistance by (i) blocking pathogens from attaching to their target sites [18], (ii) depleting nutrients hence preventing pathogens from colonizing the intestines, and (iii) SCFAs and particularly bacteriocins produced as a result of intestinal microbiota metabolic activities, which prevent pathogenic bacteria from expressing distinct virulence genes. For example, butyrate has been shown to prevent S. enterica from expressing its type III secretion system (T3SS) and thus weakens its ability to invade epithelial cells [19]. Further, (iv) organic acids generated by intestinal microbiota metabolic activities alter intraluminal pH to levels that cannot support growth and replication of pathogens such as Salmonella spp. and Escherichia coli O157 [20], and (v) intestinal microbiota utilize most oxygen available in the gut leading to the creation of an anaerobic and capnophilic environment that affects the ability of some enteric pathogens to colonize the gut [21]. However, the role of archaea, yeast, filamentous fungi, protozoan, and helminthic parasites as well as viruses including bacteriophages in colonization resistance is not fully understood so far.

3. Products of Intestinal Microbiota Metabolism Affecting C. jejuni

The colonic microbiota utilizes dietary compounds, which remain undigested and/or unabsorbed in the small intestine as growth and replication substrates. This process leads to formation of a number of metabolic products that (i) help microbiotic bacteria species to grow and replicate, (ii) are beneficial but, (iii) have also been found to be harmful to the human host (see [14, 22] for detailed reviews). Interestingly, metabolic end products derived from the intestinal microbiota aid C. jejuni, for instance, to colonize the human gut and invasion of epithelia cells in the following ways.

(a) Short Chain Fatty Acids as a Carbon Source. Like other undigested food compounds, complex dietary carbohydrates and proteins that remain undigested in the human small intestinal lumen are transported to the large intestinal tract for further digestion and absorption. The large intestine of a healthy human adult mainly harbors bacteria of the following phyla: Bacteroidetes, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Verrucomicrobia, and Proteobacteria. These bacteria are capable of anaerobically breaking polysaccharides, oligosaccharides, proteins, peptides, and glycoproteins down to form SCFAs, principally, acetate, formate, lactate, butyrate, propionate, valerate, caproate, and succinate [23]. However, the SCFA yield depends on the availability of carbon sources within the large intestine. In conditions of higher carbon availability (“excess”), the major SCFAs generated are acetate and formate, whereas in situations of low carbon availability, lactate and acetate are the major SCFA generated [24]. Interestingly, previous reports showed that C. jejuni utilizes acetate and lactate as carbon sources [25, 26]. Furthermore, lactate and acetate consequently contribute to colonization of C. jejuni in human gut.

(b) Signaling the Synthesis of Virulence-Associated Factors. C. jejuni has been shown to utilize the end products of the gut microbiotical biotransformation of bile salts and it has been demonstrated that bile salts function as induction signals for synthesis and secretion of some C. jejuni virulence-associated factors via the flagellar type III homologue secretion system [6].

Bile salts are initially synthesized in the human liver. Cholic acid (CA; 3α, 7α, 12α-trihydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oic acid) and chenodesoxycholic acid (CDCA; 3α, 7α-dihydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oic acid) are the only bile salts that are synthesized by hepatocytes. Hence, they are named primary bile salts. Upon synthesis, these bile salts circulate in a process known as enterohepatic circulation, in which they are secreted into the gallbladder, then into the duodenum, from which they reach jejunum and ileum as well as in the large intestine. There they are reabsorbed by active transport into the blood system and finally transported to the liver for resynthesis and subsequently released into the gallbladder (again) [27, 28]. The unabsorbed bile salts are transported along with other undigested products to the large intestine. There reside anaerobic gut bacteria of the genera Lactobacillus, Eubacterium, Bacteroides, Clostridium, and Escherichia, which express different bile salt hydrolases. These transform the unabsorbed bile salts by deconjugation and oxidation of hydroxyl-groups at C-3, C-7, and C-12, as well as 7α/β-dehydroxylation into their respective unconjugated free bile acids commonly known as secondary bile acids [22]. Ridley et al. used the term biotransformation to describe deconjugation, oxidation of hydroxyl-groups at C-3, C-7 and C-12, and 7α/β-dehydroxylation of unabsorbed primary bile salts [29]. During biotransformation, cholic acid (CA; 3α, 7α, 12α-trihydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oic acid) is transformed into deoxycholic acid (DOC; 3α, 12α-dihydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oic acid) while chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA; 3α, 7α-dihydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oic acid) is transformed into lithocholic acid (LCA; 3α-hydroxy-5β-cholan-24-oic acid) [29]. Human gut bacteria transform unabsorbed primary bile salts to enhance their colonization of the human gut by reducing the toxicity of the primary bile salts, to obtain carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur and to generate substances for cellular biosynthetic reactions and electron transport phosphorylation [3033].

Interestingly, various studies have found secondary bile salts in particular DOC to induce the expression of genes that encode for so-called Campylobacter invasion antigens (Cia) that have been shown to play a pivotal role in the invasion of epithelial cells and survival within the epithelial cells [6, 7, 34]. A microarray study carried out by Malik-Kale and coworkers in 2008 revealed that a total of 202 genes in the C. jejuni strain F38011 were affected when C. jejuni was cultured in media containing DOC [6]; in particular, 150 genes were up-, whereas 48 were downregulated [6].

These results amend earlier studies, which revealed that C. jejuni synthesizes at least 14 additional proteins upon cocultivation with cultured mammalian cells that are not thermotolerance-associated [35, 36]. Furthermore, these findings underline previous experiments, which revealed that C. jejuni synthesizes a number of proteins during growth in rabbit ileal loops that are not expressed under standard laboratory (in vitro) conditions [37]. The findings derived from these three studies might support results obtained in a recent study showing that eight proteins were excreted into the medium when C. jejuni was cultured with INT 407 cells or in INT 407-conditioned medium [38]. The Cia proteins are secreted via a flagellar type III homologue secretion system [39]. The role of lithocholic acid in pathogenesis of C. jejuni is unknown until now.

(c) Serving as Electron Acceptors for the C. jejuni Highly Branched Electron Transport Chains. As mentioned above, the bile salt metabolism of intestinal microbiota yields fumarate as one of its end products. C. jejuni has been shown to express a methylmenaquinol fumarate reductase (Mfr) located in the periplasm, which utilizes, as the name suggests, methylmenaquinol (mMKH2, Em,7 −124 mV) in fumarate reduction [40]. This enzyme enables C. jejuni to use fumarate as an electron acceptor in oxygen limited conditions [41]. This and other oxygen-independent electron-transport chains, namely, nitrate, nitrite, and trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) as well as dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), are believed to contribute to C. jejuni’s unique ability to colonize different environments [42].

4. Shifts in Intestinal Microbiota Composition and C. jejuni Enteritis

Reduced bacterial phyla ratio numbers in the intestinal microbiota of a healthy individual are accompanied by an abrogated physiological colonization resistance facilitating infection with pathogens. Furthermore, diseases such as type 1 diabetes [43], type 2 diabetes [44], obesity [45], inflammatory bowel disease (including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis) [46], irritable bowel syndrome [47], and celiac disease [48], among others, have been shown to be associated with shifted microbiota composition. Table 1 provides a summary of altered bacteria phyla ratios in the respective diseases and disorders.

Noninfectious diseaseNames of bacteria alteredReferences

Type 1 diabetesDecrease in Lactobacillus spp.[43]

Type 2 diabetesIncrease in Bacillus spp. and Lactobacillus spp.[44]

ObesityIncrease in Bacteroidetes  
Decrease (to low numbers) in Bifidobacteria spp.
[49, 50]

Inflammatory bowel disease (including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis)Increase in Enterobacteriaceae  
Decrease in Bacteroidetes and certain Firmicutes
[46, 51]

Irritable bowel syndromeTwofold increase in Firmicutes compared to Bacteroidetes with increase in Clostridia spp. and decrease in Bifidobacteria spp.[47]

Celiac diseaseIncrease in Lactobacillus spp., Bacteroides spp., Staphylococcus spp., and E. coli. In some cases levels of Bifidobacteria spp. increase, while there is reduction in some cases.
In children, there is increase in Firmicutes and low levels of Bacteroidetes.
[48, 5254]

As aforementioned, several factors including genetics, geographical location, diet, and antibiotic exposure, among others, can affect intestinal colonization resistance. Most recent studies have unequivocally revealed that the diet is a primary factor causing disruption of the intestinal microbiota-mediated colonization resistance. Recently, a study was carried out to compare the intestinal microbiota of children aged 1–6 in a rural African village situated in an environment that is still comparable to that of Neolithic subsistence farmers with the intestinal microbiota of western European children of the same age, consuming typical western diet. The study revealed that Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes were abundant in the children living in the rural African village, whereas Firmicutes and Proteobacteria were abundant in the European children [55]. Furthermore, the relative abundance of Firmicutes in the European children cohort was twofold higher as compared to the children population in the rural African village. Prevotella, Xylanibacter, and Treponema were exclusively present only in African children, whereas Enterobacteriaceae that are commonly abundant in European children were not detected in the rural African children. These findings are well in line with an earlier study by Turnbaugh and coworkers, detecting increased bacterial abundance (levels) of two classes of the phylum Firmicutes: (i) class Erysipelotrichi (Clostridium innocuum, Eubacterium dolichum, and Catenibacterium mitsuokai) and (ii) class Bacilli (mainly Enterococcus sp.). In addition, a drastic reduction in bacteria levels of the phylum Bacteroidetes was assessed when humanized C57BL/6J mice, initially kept on a standard low-fat-plant-polysaccharide-rich diet were switched to a high-fat, high-sugar western diet [56]. For a detailed review on how diet disrupts the intestinal microbiota, refer to [57].

Interestingly, a diet-induced intestinal microbiota shift was recently linked to susceptibility for C. jejuni infection [58]. Gnotobiotic mice fed a human western-style diet for six weeks displayed a microbiota composition more comparable to humans than to conventional mice controls. In turn, these “humanized” mice were susceptible to C. jejuni infection, whereas gnotobiotic mice that were fed standard murine chow established a murine microbiota composition accounting for colonization resistance against the pathogen-like conventionally colonized controls [58]. A quantitative survey of the bacterial species abundant in the colonic lumen of the mice on human western-style diet, standard murine diet, and gnotobiotic mice reconstituted with a complete human microbiota revealed that western-style diet fed mice harbored higher E. coli and Clostridium/Eubacterium spp. counts and lower Enterococcus and Lactobacillus spp. loads as compared to standard murine diet fed mice. This study may support the observation that individuals consuming western diet are more prone to C. jejuni infections as compared to those on a rather low-fat plant polysaccharide-rich diet [55]. The role of commensal E. coli in abrogating intestinal colonization resistance against C. jejuni has been previously shown by Haag et al. [59]. As long as the intestinal E. coli loads of adult mice harboring a conventional microbiota were artificially elevated by feeding a commensal murine E. coli strain via the drinking water, mice could be stably infected by C. jejuni at high loads, whereas conventional control animals could not. Current and future studies will further dissect the impact of distinct bacterial species within the triangle relationship of commensal bacteria, intestinal pathogens, and innate host responses [8, 59].

5. Stage Model for the Pathogenesis of C. jejuni

After overcoming the intestinal microbiota barrier located on and within the intestinal mucin layer, C. jejuni has to pass the mucosal epithelial barrier. Although not all C. jejuni virulence-associated factors are known up to now, the present findings have led to the construction of a stage model that attempts to explain to role of the associated virulence determinants involved in the pathogenesis of C. jejuni infection at this point. These stages are (1) motility and chemotaxis, (2) adherence to, translocation, and invasion of intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), (3) toxin production, (4) survival in the epithelial cells, and (5) immune response and inflammation of the intestinal epithelium [7, 60].

The expression of specific gene sets could be attributed to these different stages: Firstly, the flaA and flaB genes (flagellin A & B that assemble flagella) and the regulatory gene cheY (chemotaxis regulatory protein) are expressed. Flagella are responsible for motility while cheY plays a role in chemotaxis [6163]. Secondly, the gene products of peb1A (periplasmic bifunctional adhesin/ABC transporter aspartate/glutamate-binding protein), cadF (cadherin F—outer membrane fibronectin-binding protein), jlpA (surface lipoprotein), pflA (paralysed flagellum protein), ciaB, ciaC, ciaI (Campylobacter invasion antigens B, C & I), and a cluster of lipooligosaccharide (LOS) biosynthesis genes as well as pseudaminic acid and legionaminic acid biosynthesis genes are synthesized. They play a distinct role in adhesion and invasion [7, 38, 6469].

Thirdly, the gene products of cdtA, cdtB, and cdtC assemble the trimeric cytolethal distending toxin (CDT). CDT contributes to the cytopathic effect associated with C. jejuni infection [70]. Fourthly, the genes chuABCD, ceuBCDE, cfrA, fhuABD, feoB, tonB-exbB-exbD, cft, and perR essentially involved in iron homeostasis are expressed [29, 60, 7175]. It should be noted, however, that in a subgroup of C. jejuni isolates, that exhibit an extended amino acid metabolism [76], the ferric uptake receptor cfrA is replaced by a protein of unknown function and a second iron uptake transport system encoded by the genes cj0173c-cj0182 is missing critical components, such as cj0178 and tonB3, for instance [77, 78]. Fifthly, gene sodB (superoxide dismutase) and the genes katA (catalase) and ahpC (alkyl hydroperoxide reductase) contributing to superoxide stress defense and peroxide stress defense, respectively, are expressed [7981]. Finally, the genes groES (cochaperonin), groEL (chaperone), dnaJ (chaperone), dnaK (chaperone), and clpB (ATP-dependent Clp protease ATP-binding subunit) that play a role in thermotolerance are expressed [36, 8284]. It has been shown that C. jejuni changes its respiration mode to fumarate respiration and undergoes metabolic downshift in order to survive in mammalian cells [33].

6. C. jejuni Induced Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses in the Gastrointestinal Tract

The human gastrointestinal tract is endowed with a complex immune system that is made up of cells, tissues, and immune effector molecules constantly and efficiently communicating with each other in order to eliminate invading microbial pathogens. As discussed above, a shift in the intestinal microbiota composition leaves the intestinal epithelial cells (IECs) vulnerable to invasion by C. jejuni consequently activating both the innate and adaptive immune system [85]. The major site of bacteria mediated inflammation and tissue destruction is located in the colon, but there is evidence showing that the mucosal immune responses include the ileum because C. jejuni is transported across the epithelial barrier via ileal M-cells [86].

Upon adhesion and invasion of the colonic epithelium, C. jejuni induces IL-8 secretion, which to some extent is initiated by the cytolethal distending toxin (CDT) [87]. The IL-8 response is the initial trigger for acute mucosal inflammation characterized by neutrophil infiltration and macrophage activation, as well as proliferation of T- and B-lymphocytes. Besides these immune cell aggregates immunopathological features observed in colonic biopsies of infected patients include apoptotic crypt drop-outs, microabscesses, and focal ulcerations [88, 89]. The corresponding IgA and IgG antibodies produced by mature B-cells against C. jejuni are considered to contribute to long-term protection against reinfection, but they might be detrimental when cross-reacting with gangliosides in neurons which in turn results in neurological sequelae such as GBS in about 1 out of 900 infected patients [90].

C. jejuni induced innate immune responses are initiated by binding of bacterial cell wall compounds to nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD) or to Toll-like receptors (TLRs). At the cellular level adhering and invading C. jejuni are detected by Toll-like-receptor 4 and NOD1/CARD4, respectively. Innate immune signaling results in the activation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) [91]. Further, NF-κB stimulates production of various cytokines, which in turn mediate maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) into antigen presenting cells (APCs) and shape subsequent B- and T-cell responses (Table 2 provides a summary of these cytokines), whereas the activation of Mφ-phagocytic cells, monocytes, and neutrophils finally leads to direct elimination of C. jejuni [9294]. Within this scenario, human β-defensins have been shown to attack C. jejuni by rupturing the cell membrane [95]. While the role of B-cells and the role of the antibody responses in GBS on one hand and protection against disease on the other is well understood [90], innate immunity of campylobacteriosis and corresponding T-cell responses await further investigation and are thus in the focus of current and ongoing research. The lipooligosaccharide (LOS) of C. jejuni and the corresponding innate receptor toll-like-receptor (TLR) 4 were shown to be of pivotal importance for induction and progression of experimental [96] and human campylobacteriosis [97]. Notably, the LOS structure of C. jejuni is highly variable and it was shown that decoration of LOS with sialic acid residues aggravates the inflammatory response and the outcome of human campylobacteriosis [97]. The elevated pathogenic potential of C. jejuni strains with sialylated LOS (subtypes A, B, and C) is explained by the increased binding of sialylated LOS to TLR-4 [98, 99]. The resulting hyper-activation of TLR-4 signaling further drives ulcerative enteritis, bloody diarrhea, fever, and postinfectious sequelae including GBS [97]. The important role of TLR-4 signaling in C. jejuni immunopathology was confirmed in murine models of disease [87, 90] and corresponding results demonstrate that LOS is a key virulence factor of C. jejuni. Besides TLR-4, other TLRs such as TLR-2 and TLR-5 play only a minor role in C. jejuni enteritis [90] indicating that C. jejuni flagellin and lipoproteins are not crucial for activation of the immune system [100].

CytokinesPossible functionReferences

Chemokines: CC families: MIP-1α, MIP-1β, RANTES, and MCP-1They act as chemoattractant agents for monocytes and T-lymphocytes.[92]

Chemokines: CXC families: GRO-α, GRO-γ, IP-10, and MIGGRO-α and GRO-γ attract neutrophils to sites of inflammation. IP-10 and MIG promote the chemotaxis of monocytes and activated T-lymphocytes.[101]

Interleukins: IL-1B, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17A, IL-17F, IL-22, and IL-23 These chemoattractants and immune cells activators initiate Th1 and Th17 response. IL-5 and IL-6 activate STAT3. IL-22 maintains epithelial cell function and activation of macrophages.[69, 93, 96, 100, 102, 103]

Interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)[59, 69, 86, 93]

Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)Plays a major role in production of IL-1 and IL-6[86, 93]

Nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer (NF-κB)signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3)Stimulates production of chemokines
limits host inflammatory response in the gut
[86, 92, 104, 105]

The C. jejuni induced adaptive T-cell responses in the intestines have been recently dissected in an elegant study using ex vivo infected explants of human colon tissue [69]. In these biopsies C. jejuni reached the subepithelial compartments following adhesion and invasion of IECs. The direct contact of the invading bacteria with neutrophils, macrophages, and dendritic cells initiated Th1 and responses characterized by the release of IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-12, and IL-6 [69]. Increased IL-12 and IL-23 levels in these artificially infected biopsies were indicative of DC activation and maturation, which is subsequently driving the response of distinct Th17 cell subsets. Elevated numbers of Th17, Th1, and Th17/Th1 double-positive cells in the ex vivo infected biopsies were well in line with increased concentrations of IL-22 and IL-17 which finally orchestrate the eradication of the pathogen by induction of innate responses and defensin production in the epithelium [69].

7. Recent Advances in Developing Murine Models Mimicking Human Campylobacteriosis

Although human campylobacteriosis is of global importance, efforts geared towards understanding the underlying molecular mechanisms of C. jejuni infection and associated immune responses have not yielded profound insights due to the lack of appropriate in vivo models. Chicken, newborn piglets, weanling ferrets, gnotobiotic canine pups, primates, and isolator-raised germ-free mice models have been more or less successfully used for studying the interaction between C. jejuni and the human host. Numerous studies are hampered for several reasons; a detailed discussion, however, is beyond the scope of this review. In a nutshell, all mentioned models are expensive to construct and maintain, some are challenging in handling and availability, or lack of reproducibility [106]. Most murine models overcome these shortcomings, but suffer from sporadic colonization and/or absence of clinical disease manifestation [107]. Recently, combinations of various strategies have been used to construct gnotobiotic mice (GB), gnotobiotic humanized flora-associated mice (hfa), and gnotobiotic murine flora-associated mice (mfa) models [94]. The GB mice model was developed by treating 10- to 12-week old mice with a quintuple antibiotic regimen (consisting of ampicillin, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, and metronidazole) for six to eight weeks [108]. These gnotobiotic mice had been raised and housed under regular conditions and exhibited a fully developed immune system as opposed to isolator-raised germfree animals. Hfa mice and mfa mice were then generated by peroral recolonization of GB mice with complex human or murine microbiota, respectively. While mfa and conventional control mice expel the pathogen within a few days post infection, hfa mice are highly susceptible to C. jejuni infection and harbor the pathogen at high loads, further underlining that colonization resistance against (and susceptibility for) intestinal pathogens such as C. jejuni is due to the distinct host microbiota composition. Upon stable infection, GB and hfa mice display C. jejuni induced immunopathological features as seen in humans such as proinflammatory immune responses in the intestinal tract accompanied by significant apoptosis of the colonic epithelial cells, whereas severe clinical campylobacteriosis symptoms such as bloody diarrhea are lacking. In the following, Haag et al. showed that conventionally colonized infant mice infected with C. jejuni right after weaning at the age of three weeks developed self-limiting acute ulcerative enterocolitis like in “classical” human campylobacteriosis [109]. Interestingly, infant mice were susceptible to C. jejuni infection—again—due to relatively high commensal E. coli loads in their intestines by the age of three weeks, whereas over time E. coli burdens decreased subsequently rendering mice resistant to the pathogen [109]. Surprisingly, after the acute phase of infection, infant mice were asymptomatic carriers of C. jejuni over months. Strikingly, despite the absence of clinical sequelae, distinct inflammatory responses could be detected within the intestinal tract but also at extraintestinal tissue sites such as liver, kidney, and the lungs [109]. The infiltrating immune cells were mostly consisting of CD3+ T-lymphocytes, and to a lesser extent of B220+ B-lymphocytes. Thus, the infant C. jejuni infection model is not only mimicking “classical” self-limiting human campylobacteriosis, but might also be helping to unravel chronic (postinfectious) sequelae. Furthermore, gnotobiotic mice deficient in TLR-2, TLR-4, TLR-9, MyD88, and IL-10 genes have immensely contributed to our present understanding of the innate and adaptive immune responses and accompanying pro-inflammatory responses following C. jejuni infection [94, 96]. Remarkably, within six days upon C. jejuni infection, gnotobiotic IL-10-deficient mice developed severe ulcerative enterocolitis, which was not self-limiting and thus mimicking severe human campylobacteriosis like in immunocompromized (e.g., AIDS) patients [96]. Immunopathology was significantly less pronounced, however, when gnotobiotic IL-10−/− mice were additionally lacking the TLR-4 or, to a lesser extent, TLR-2 gene. Thus, signaling of C. jejuni lipooligosaccharide and lipoproteins play pivotal roles in the immunopathology of campylobacteriosis [94, 96].

8. Concluding Remarks

Although the exact species composition of the intestinal microbiota facilitating C. jejuni infection has not completely unraveled to date, the recent progress in establishing a plethora of reliable murine models for different degrees of C. jejuni infection such as the development of GB and hfa, gene-knockout, and weaned infant mice models are and will be useful to further understand the underlying molecular mechanisms of interactions between C. jejuni and the human intestinal microbiota as well as the human immune system. Ultimately, this could help to support the development of preventive or therapeutic strategies against C. jejuni-associated disease for instance through the establishment of appropriate diet schemes.


The authors’ work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG GR906/13-1, GO363/12-1, SFB633, and TP A7 and B6; ministry for education and research (BMBF) program “Lab in a hanky” TP1.1 and TP8.2) and the Forschungsförderungsprogramm of the Universitätsmedizin Göttingen (UMG), Germany. This paper was funded by the Open Access support program of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and the publication fund of the Georg August Universität Göttingen.


  1. J. Parkhill, B. W. Wren, K. Mungall et al., “The genome sequence of the food-borne pathogen Campylobacter jejuni reveals hypervariable sequences,” Nature, vol. 403, no. 6770, pp. 665–668, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. J. I. Dasti, A. M. Tareen, R. Lugert, A. E. Zautner, and U. Groß, “Campylobacter jejuni: a brief overview on pathogenicity-associated factors and disease-mediating mechanisms,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 300, no. 4, pp. 205–211, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. E. Zautner, S. Herrmann, and U. Groß, “Campylobacter jejuni—the search for virulence-associated factors,” Archiv für Lebensmittelhygiene, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 91–101, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. C. ML, “Causes and management of diarrhea in children in a clinical setting,” South African Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 10, p. 5, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  5. T. Alter, S. Bereswill, G. Glünder et al., “Campylobacteriosis of man: livestock as reservoir for Campylobacter species,” Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 728–734, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. P. Malik-Kale, C. T. Parker, and M. E. Konkel, “Culture of Campylobacter jejuni with sodium deoxycholate induces virulence gene expression,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 190, no. 7, pp. 2286–2297, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. E. Konkel, M. R. Monteville, V. Rivera-Amill, and L. A. Joens, “The pathogenesis of Campylobacter jejuni-mediated enteritis,” Current Issues in Intestinal Microbiology, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 55–71, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  8. T. D. Lawley and A. W. Walker, “Intestinal colonization resistance,” Immunology, vol. 138, pp. 1–11, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  9. P. B. Eckburg, E. M. Bik, C. N. Bernstein et al., “Microbiology: diversity of the human intestinal microbial flora,” Science, vol. 308, no. 5728, pp. 1635–1638, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Penders, C. Thijs, C. Vink et al., “Factors influencing the composition of the intestinal microbiota in early infancy,” Pediatrics, vol. 118, no. 2, pp. 511–521, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. R. Bennet and C. E. Nord, “Development of the faecal anaerobic microflora after caesarean section and treatment with antibiotics in newborn infants,” Infection, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 332–336, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  12. C. A. Lozupone, J. I. Stombaugh, J. I. Gordon, J. K. Jansson, and R. Knight, “Diversity, stability and resilience of the human gut microbiota,” Nature, vol. 489, pp. 220–230, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  13. H. J. Flint, K. P. Scott, P. Louis, and S. H. Duncan, “The role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health,” Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology, vol. 9, pp. 577–589, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. Blaut and T. Clavel, “Metabolic diversity of the intestinal microbiota: implications for health and disease,” The Journal of Nutrition, vol. 137, no. 3, pp. 751S–755S, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. M. Kosiewicz, A. L. Zirnheld, and P. Alard, “Gut microbiota, immunity, and disease: a complex relationship,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 2, p. 180, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M. J. Molloy, N. Bouladoux, and Y. Belkaid, “Intestinal microbiota: shaping local and systemic immune responses,” Seminars in Immunology, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 58–66, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Bohnhoff, B. L. Drake, and C. P. Miller, “The effect of an antibiotic on the susceptibility of the mouse's intestinal tract to Salmonella infection,” Antibiotics Annual, vol. 3, pp. 453–455, 1955. View at: Google Scholar
  18. L. Lu and W. A. Walker, “Pathologic and physiologic interactions of bacteria with the gastrointestinal epithelium,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 1124S–1130S, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  19. I. Gantois, R. Ducatelle, F. Pasmans et al., “Butyrate specifically down-regulates Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 gene expression,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 946–949, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. C. A. Cherrington, M. Hinton, G. R. Pearson, and I. Chopra, “Short-chain organic acids at pH 5.0 kill Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. without causing membrane perturbation,” The Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 161–165, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  21. B. Marteyn, F. B. Scorza, P. J. Sansonetti, and C. Tang, “Breathing life into pathogens: the influence of oxygen on bacterial virulence and host responses in the gastrointestinal tract,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 171–176, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. J. K. Nicholson, E. Holmes, J. Kinross et al., “Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions,” Science, vol. 336, pp. 1262–1267, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  23. J. H. Cummings and G. T. Macfarlane, “The control and consequences of bacterial fermentation in the human colon,” The Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 443–459, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  24. S. Macfarlane and G. T. Macfarlane, “Regulation of short-chain fatty acid production,” Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 67–72, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. A. Wright, A. J. Grant, D. Hurd et al., “Metabolite and transcriptome analysis of Campylobacter jejuni in vitro growth reveals a stationary-phase physiological switch,” Microbiology, vol. 155, no. 1, pp. 80–94, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. M. T. Thomas, M. Shepherd, R. K. Poole, A. H. M. van Vliet, D. J. Kelly, and B. M. Pearson, “Two respiratory enzyme systems in Campylobacter jejuni NCTC 11168 contribute to growth on l-lactate,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 48–61, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. K. W. Heaton, “The importance of keeping bile salts in their place,” Gut, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 857–863, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  28. A. F. Hofmann, “The continuing importance of bile acids in liver and intestinal disease,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 159, no. 22, pp. 2647–2658, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. K. A. Ridley, J. D. Rock, Y. Li, and J. M. Ketley, “Heme utilization in Campylobacter jejuni,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 188, no. 22, pp. 7862–7875, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. I. de Smet, L. van Hoorde, M. Vande Woestyne, H. Christiaens, and W. Verstraete, “Significance of bile salt hydrolytic activities of lactobacilli,” The Journal of Applied Bacteriology, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 292–301, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  31. J. van Eldere, P. Celis, G. de Pauw, E. Lesaffre, and H. Eyssen, “Tauroconjugation of cholic acid stimulates 7α-dehydroxylation by fecal bacteria,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 656–661, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  32. A. M. Cook and K. Denger, “Dissimilation of the C2 sulfonates,” Archives of Microbiology, vol. 179, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. X. Liu, B. Gao, V. Novik, and J. E. Galan, “Quantitative proteomics of intracellular Campylobacter jejuni reveals metabolic reprogramming,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 8, Article ID e1002562, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  34. A. M. Tareen, J. I. Dasti, A. E. Zautner, U. Groß, and R. Lugert, “Campylobacter jejuni proteins Cj0952c and Cj0951c affect chemotactic behaviour towards formic acid and are important for invasion of host cells,” Microbiology, vol. 156, no. 10, pp. 3123–3135, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. M. E. Konkel and W. Cieplak Jr., “Altered synthetic response of Campylobacter jejuni to cocultivation with human epithelial cells is associated with enhanced internalization,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 4945–4949, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  36. M. E. Konkel, B. J. Kim, J. D. Klena, C. R. Young, and R. Ziprin, “Characterization of the thermal stress response of Campylobacter jejuni,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 3666–3672, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  37. P. Panigrahi, G. Losonsky, L. J. deTolla, and J. G. Morris Jr., “Human immune response to Campylobacter jejuni proteins expressed in vivo,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 4938–4944, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. E. Konkel, B. J. Kim, V. Rivera-Amill, and S. G. Garvis, “Bacterial secreted proteins are required for the internalization of Campylobacter jejuni into cultured mammalian cells,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 691–701, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. M. E. Konkel, J. D. Klena, V. Rivera-Amill et al., “Secretion of virulence proteins from Campylobacter jejuni is dependent on a functional flagellar export apparatus,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 186, no. 11, pp. 3296–3303, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. E. Guccione, A. Hitchcock, S. J. Hall et al., “Reduction of fumarate, mesaconate and crotonate by Mfr, a novel oxygen-regulated periplasmic reductase in Campylobacter jejuni,” Environmental Microbiology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 576–591, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. M. J. Sellars, S. J. Hall, and D. J. Kelly, “Growth of Campylobacter jejuni supported by respiration of fumarate, nitrate, nitrite, trimethylamine-N-oxide, or dimethyl sulfoxide requires oxygen,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 184, no. 15, pp. 4187–4196, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. D. R. Weerakoon, N. J. Borden, C. M. Goodson, J. Grimes, and J. W. Olson, “The role of respiratory donor enzymes in Campylobacter jejuni host colonization and physiology,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 8–15, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. L. Wen, R. E. Ley, P. Y. Volchkov et al., “Innate immunity and intestinal microbiota in the development of type 1 diabetes,” Nature, vol. 455, no. 7216, pp. 1109–1113, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. N. Larsen, F. K. Vogensen, F. W. J. van den Berg et al., “Gut microbiota in human adults with type 2 diabetes differs from non-diabetic adults,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 2, Article ID e9085, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. P. J. Turnbaugh, R. E. Ley, M. A. Mahowald, V. Magrini, E. R. Mardis, and J. I. Gordon, “An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest,” Nature, vol. 444, no. 7122, pp. 1027–1031, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. D. N. Frank, A. L. St. Amand, R. A. Feldman, E. C. Boedeker, N. Harpaz, and N. R. Pace, “Molecular-phylogenetic characterization of microbial community imbalances in human inflammatory bowel diseases,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 34, pp. 13780–13785, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Rajilić-Stojanović, E. Biagi, H. G. H. J. Heilig et al., “Global and deep molecular analysis of microbiota signatures in fecal samples from patients with irritable bowel syndrome,” Gastroenterology, vol. 141, no. 5, pp. 1792–1801, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. E. Nistal, A. Caminero, S. Vivas et al., “Differences in faecal bacteria populations and faecal bacteria metabolism in healthy adults and celiac disease patients,” Biochimie, vol. 94, pp. 1724–1729, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. F. Bäckhed, H. Ding, T. Wang et al., “The gut microbiota as an environmental factor that regulates fat storage,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 101, no. 44, pp. 15718–15723, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. S. H. Duncan, G. E. Lobley, G. Holtrop et al., “Human colonic microbiota associated with diet, obesity and weight loss,” International Journal of Obesity, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 1720–1724, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. H. Sokol, P. Lepage, P. Seksik, J. Doré, and P. Marteau, “Temperature gradient gel electrophoresis of fecal 16S rRNA reveals active Escherichia coli in the microbiota of patients with ulcerative colitis,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 3172–3177, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. Y. Sanz, G. D. Pama, and M. Laparra, “Unraveling the ties between celiac disease and intestinal microbiota,” International Reviews of Immunology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 207–218, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. E. Sánchez, G. de Palma, A. Capilla et al., “Influence of environmental and genetic factors linked to celiac disease risk on infant gut colonization by Bacteroides species,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 15, pp. 5316–5323, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. G. de Palma, I. Nadal, M. Medina et al., “Intestinal dysbiosis and reduced immunoglobulin-coated bacteria associated with coeliac disease in children,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 10, article 63, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. C. de Filippo, D. Cavalieri, M. Di Paola et al., “Impact of diet in shaping gut microbiota revealed by a comparative study in children from Europe and rural Africa,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 33, pp. 14691–14696, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. P. J. Turnbaugh, V. K. Ridaura, J. J. Faith, F. E. Rey, R. Knight, and J. I. Gordon, “The effect of diet on the human gut microbiome: a metagenomic analysis in humanized gnotobiotic mice,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 1, no. 6, p. 6ra14, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. K. Brown, D. DeCoffe, E. Molcan, and D. L. Gibson, “Diet-induced dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota and the effects on immunity and disease,” Nutrients, vol. 4, pp. 1095–1119, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  58. S. Bereswill, R. Plickert, A. Fischer et al., “What you eat is what you get: novel campylobacter models in the quadrangle relationship between nutrition, obesity, microbiota and susceptibility to infection,” European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 1, pp. 237–248, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  59. L.-M. Haag, A. Fischer, B. Otto et al., “Intestinal microbiota shifts towards elevated commensal Escherichia coli loads abrogate colonization resistance against Campylobacter jejuni in mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 5, Article ID e35988, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. H. M. van Vliet, M.-L. A. Baillon, C. W. Penn, and J. M. Ketley, “The iron-induced ferredoxin FdxA of Campylobacter jejuni is involved in aerotolerance,” FEMS Microbiology Letters, vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 189–193, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. P. J. M. Nuijten, F. J. A. M. van Asten, W. Gaastra, and B. A. M. van der Zeijst, “Structural and functional analysis of two Campylobacter jejuni flagellin genes,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 265, no. 29, pp. 17798–17804, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  62. R. Yao, D. H. Burr, and P. Guerry, “CheY-mediated modulation of Campylobacter jejuni virulence,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1021–1031, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  63. A. E. Zautner, A. M. Tareen, U. Groß, and R. Lugert, “Chemotaxis in Campylobacter jejuni,” European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 2, pp. 24–31, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  64. Z. Pei, C. Burucoa, B. Grignon et al., “Mutation in the peb1A locus of Campylobacter jejuni reduces interactions with epithelial cells and intestinal colonization of mice,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 938–943, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  65. M. E. Konkel, S. G. Garvis, S. L. Tipton, D. E. Anderson Jr., and W. Cieplak Jr., “Identification and molecular cloning of a gene encoding a fibronectin- binding protein (CadF) from Campylobacter jejuni,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 953–963, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  66. S. Jin, A. Joe, J. Lynett, E. K. Hani, P. Sherman, and V. L. Chan, “JlpA, a novel surface-exposed lipoprotein specific to Campylobacter jejuni, mediates adherence to host epithelial cells,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 1225–1236, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. A. Malik Tareen, J. I. Dasti, A. E. Zautner, U. Groß, and R. Lugert, “Sulphite: cytochrome c oxidoreductase deficiency in Campylobacter jejuni reduces motility, host cell adherence and invasion,” Microbiology, vol. 157, no. 6, pp. 1776–1785, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. D. R. Buelow, J. E. Christensen, J. M. Neal-Mckinney, and M. E. Konkel, “Campylobacter jejuni survival within human epithelial cells is enhanced by the secreted protein CiaI,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1296–1312, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. L. A. Edwards, K. Nistala, D. C. Mills et al., “Delineation of the innate and adaptive T-cell immune outcome in the human host in response to Campylobacter jejuni infection,” PLoS ONE, vol. 5, no. 11, Article ID e15398, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. C. L. Pickett, E. C. Pesci, D. L. Cottle, G. Russell, A. N. Erdem, and H. Zeytin, “Prevalence of cytolethal distending toxin production in Campylobacter jejuni and relatedness of Campylobacter sp. cdtB genes,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 2070–2078, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  71. P. T. Richardson and S. F. Park, “Enterochelin acquisition in Campylobacter coli: characterization of components of a binding-protein-dependent transport system,” Microbiology, vol. 141, no. 12, pp. 3181–3191, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  72. P. Guerry, J. Perez-Casal, R. Yao, A. Mcveigh, and T. J. Trust, “A genetic locus involved in iron utilization unique to some Campylobacter strains,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 179, no. 12, pp. 3997–4002, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  73. M. A. Galindo, W. A. Day, B. H. Raphael, and L. A. Joens, “Cloning and characterization of a Campylobacter jejuni iron-uptake operon,” Current Microbiology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 139–143, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. R. A. Larsen, M. G. Thomas, and K. Postle, “Protonmotive force, ExbB and ligand-bound FepA drive conformational changes in TonB,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1809–1824, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  75. S. N. Wai, K. Nakayama, K. Umene, T. Moriya, and K. Amako, “Construction of a ferritin-deficient mutant of Campylobacter jejuni: contribution of ferritin to iron storage and protection against oxidative stress,” Molecular Microbiology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1127–1134, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. A. E. Zautner, S. Herrmann, J. Corso, A. M. Tareen, T. Alter, and U. Groß, “Epidemiological association of different Campylobacter jejuni groups with metabolism-associated genetic markers,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 77, no. 7, pp. 2359–2365, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. D. Hofreuter, V. Novik, and J. E. Galán, “Metabolic diversity in Campylobacter jejuni enhances specific tissue colonization,” Cell Host and Microbe, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 425–433, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. A. E. Zautner, C. Ohk, A. M. Tareen, R. Lugert, and U. Groß, “Epidemiological association of Campylobacter jejuni groups with pathogenicity-associated genetic markers,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 12, p. 171, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  79. E. C. Pesci, D. L. Cottle, and C. L. Pickett, “Genetic, enzymatic, and pathogenic studies of the iron superoxide dismutase of Campylobacter jejuni,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 2687–2694, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  80. K. A. Grant and S. F. Park, “Molecular characterization of katA from Campylobacter jejuni and generation of a catalase-deficient mutant of Campylobacter coli by interspecific allelic exchange,” Microbiology, vol. 141, no. 6, pp. 1369–1376, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  81. M.-L. A. Baillon, A. H. M. van Vliet, J. M. Ketley, C. Constantinidou, and C. W. Penn, “An iron-regulated alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) confers aerotolerance and oxidative stress resistance to the microaerophilic pathogen Campylobacter jejuni,” Journal of Bacteriology, vol. 181, no. 16, pp. 4798–4804, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  82. F. L. Thies, H. Karch, H.-P. Hartung, and G. Giegerich, “The ClpB protein from Campylobacter jejuni: molecular characterization of the encoding gene and antigenicity of the recombinant protein,” Gene, vol. 230, no. 1, pp. 61–67, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. F. L. Thies, H. Karch, H.-P. Hartung, and G. Giegerich, “Cloning and expression of the dnaK gene of Campylobacter jejuni and antigenicity of heat shock protein 70,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 1194–1200, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  84. F. L. Thies, A. Weishaupt, H. Karch, H.-P. Hartung, and G. Giegerich, “Cloning, sequencing and molecular analysis of the Campylobacter jejuni groESL bicistronic operon,” Microbiology, vol. 145, no. 1, pp. 89–98, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  85. Q. Yuan and W. A. Walker, “Innate immunity of the gut: mucosal defense in health and disease,” Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 463–473, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  86. L. Hu, J. P. McDaniel, and D. J. Kopecko, “Signal transduction events involved in human epithelial cell invasion by Campylobacter jejuni 81–176,” Microbial Pathogenesis, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 91–100, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. J. Zheng, J. Meng, S. Zhao, R. Singh, and W. Song, “Campylobacter-induced interleukin-8 secretion in polarized human intestinal epithelial cells requires Campylobacter-secreted cytolethal distending toxin- and toll-like receptor-mediated activation of NF-κB,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 76, no. 10, pp. 4498–4508, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. J. P. van Spreeuwel, G. C. Duursma, C. J. L. M. Meijer et al., “Campylobacter colitis: histological immunohistochemical and ultrastructural findings,” Gut, vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 945–951, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  89. R. I. Walker, M. B. Caldwell, and E. C. Lee, “Pathophysiology of Campylobacter enteritis,” Microbiological Reviews, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 81–94, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  90. J. M. Ketley, “Pathogeneis of enteric infection by Campylobacter,” Microbiology, vol. 143, no. 1, pp. 5–21, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  91. M. Zilbauer, N. Dorrell, A. Elmi et al., “A major role for intestinal epithelial nucleotide oligomerization domain 1 (NOD1) in eliciting host bactericidal immune responses to Campylobacter jejuni,” Cellular Microbiology, vol. 9, no. 10, pp. 2404–2416, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. L. Hu, M. D. Bray, Y. Geng, and D. J. Kopecko, “Campylobacter jejuni-mediated induction of CC and CXC chemokines and chemokine receptors in human dendritic cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 80, pp. 2929–2939, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  93. M. Klaas, C. Oetke, L. E. Lewis et al., “Sialoadhesin promotes rapid proinflammatory and type I IFN responses to a sialylated pathogen,Campylobacter jejuni,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 189, pp. 2414–2422, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  94. S. Bereswill, A. Fischer, R. Plickert et al., “Novel murine infection models provide deep insights into the “Ménage à trois” of Campylobacter jejuni, microbiota and host innate immunity,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 6, Article ID e20953, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. M. Zilbauer, N. Dorrell, P. K. Boughan et al., “Intestinal innate immunity to Campylobacter jejuni results in induction of bactericidal human beta-defensins 2 and 3,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 7281–7289, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. L. M. Haag, A. Fischer, B. Otto et al., “Campylobacter jejuni induces acute enterocolitis in gnotobiotic IL-10-/- mice via Toll-like-receptor-2 and -4 signaling,” PloS ONE, vol. 7, Article ID e40761, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  97. N. P. Mortensen, M. L. Kuijf, C. W. Ang et al., “Sialylation of Campylobacter jejuni lipo-oligosaccharides is associated with severe gastro-enteritis and reactive arthritis,” Microbes and Infection, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 988–994, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. H. N. Stephenson, C. M. John, N. Naz et al., “Campylobacter jejuni lipooligosaccharide sialylation, phosphorylation, and amide/ester linkage modifications fine-tune human Toll-like receptor 4 activation,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, pp. 19661–19672, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  99. A. P. Heikema, R. I. Koning, S. Duarte dos Santos Rico et al., “Enhanced, sialoadhesin-dependent uptake of Guillain-Barre syndrome-associated Campylobacter jejuni strains by human macrophages,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 81, pp. 2095–2103, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  100. P. A. Johanesen and M. B. Dwinell, “Flagellin-independent regulation of chemokine host defense in Campylobacter jejuni-infected intestinal epithelium,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 3437–3447, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. D. D. Taub, A. R. Lloyd, K. Conlon et al., “Recombinant human interferon-inducible protein 10 is a chemoattractant for human monocytes and T lymphocytes and promotes T cell adhesion to endothelial cells,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 177, no. 6, pp. 1809–1814, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  102. L. Hu, M. D. Bray, M. Osorio, and D. J. Kopecko, “Campylobacter jejuni induces maturation and cytokine production in human dendritic cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 2697–2705, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. A. J. MacCallum, D. Harris, G. Haddock, and P. H. Everest, “Campylobacter jejuni-infected human epithelial cell lines vary in their ability to secrete interleukin-8 compared to in vitro-infected primary human intestinal tissue,” Microbiology, vol. 152, no. 12, pp. 3661–3665, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. L. Hu and T. E. Hickey, “Campylobacter jejuni induces secretion of proinflammatory chemokines from human intestinal epithelial cells,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 4437–4440, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. J. E. Darnell Jr., “STATs and gene regulation,” Science, vol. 277, no. 5332, pp. 1630–1635, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. D. G. Newell, “Animal models of Campylobacter jejuni colonization and disease and the lessons to be learned from similar Helicobacter pylori models,” Journal of Applied Microbiology Symposium Supplement, vol. 90, no. 30, pp. 57S–67S, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  107. M. Kist and S. Bereswill, “Campylobacter jejuni,” Contributions to Microbiology, vol. 8, pp. 150–165, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  108. M. M. Heimesaat, S. Bereswill, A. Fischer et al., “Gram-negative bacteria aggravate murine small intestinal Th1-type immunopathology following oral infection with Toxoplasma gondii,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 177, no. 12, pp. 8785–8795, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  109. L. M. Haag, A. Fischer, B. Otto et al., “Campylobacter jejuni infection of infant mice: acute enterocolitis is followed by asymptomatic intestinal and extra-intestinal immune responses,” European Journal of Microbiology and Immunology, vol. 1, pp. 2–11, 2012. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2013 Wycliffe Omurwa Masanta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.