Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Immunology Research
Volume 2015, Article ID 851945, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/851945
Review Article

Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease

1Laboratoire d’Études Moléculaires des Valvulopathies (LEMV), Groupe de Recherche en Valvulopathies (GRV), Quebec Heart and Lung Institute/Research Center, Department of Surgery, Laval University, QC, Canada
2Institut de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, 2725 Chemin Sainte-Foy, Québec, QC, Canada G1V 4G5

Received 14 August 2014; Accepted 16 September 2014

Academic Editor: Giacomina Brunetti

Copyright © 2015 Patrick Mathieu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is the most common heart valve disorder. CAVD is a chronic process characterized by a pathologic mineralization of valve leaflets. Ectopic mineralization of the aortic valve involves complex relationships with immunity. Studies have highlighted that both innate and adaptive immunity play a role in the development of CAVD. In this regard, accumulating evidence indicates that fibrocalcific remodelling of the aortic valve is associated with activation of the NF-κB pathway. The expression of TNF-α and IL-6 is increased in human mineralized aortic valves and promotes an osteogenic program as well as the mineralization of valve interstitial cells (VICs), the main cellular component of the aortic valve. Different factors, including oxidized lipid species, activate the innate immune response through the Toll-like receptors. Moreover, VICs express 5-lipoxygenase and therefore produce leukotrienes, which may amplify the inflammatory response in the aortic valve. More recently, studies have emphasized that an adaptive immune response is triggered during CAVD. Herein, we are reviewing the link between the immune response and the development of CAVD and we have tried, whenever possible, to keep a translational approach.

1. Introduction

Ectopic cardiovascular mineralization occurs in different disorders and is associated with a substantial morbidity. Long seen as a passive process ectopic pathologic mineralization is now considered as a highly regulated process at the molecular and cellular levels [1]. Calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD) is a chronic disorder that involves a mineralization of the valvular tissue. Fibrosis often accompanies pathologic mineralization and both processes contribute to the fibrocalcific remodelling of the aortic valve. CAVD is the most common heart valve disease and encompasses a wide variety of clinical presentations. As such, there is a continuum from aortic valve sclerosis to severe aortic stenosis with a common underlying process: ectopic mineralization of the aortic valve [2]. One key central question, still unresolved, is what drives the fibrocalcific remodelling of the aortic valve. Is the mineralization of the aortic valve triggered and enhanced by factors that normally promote the mineralization of bone? Studies performed in the last decade have unravelled important key underlying mechanisms involved in the ectopic mineralization of the aortic valve. These works have highlighted that though there are, to some extent, similarities with the ossification process, the mineralization of the aortic valve relies on specific mechanisms that differ from bone ossification. In fact, the response to different stimuli may diverge considerably in VICs when compared to osteoblasts. These findings may thus explain the association between osteoporosis and ectopic vascular/valvular mineralization [3]. The tissue architecture and specific mechanical strain imposed on the aortic valve drive specific molecular events that may promote pathologic mineralization [4]. Apart from mineralization, key features of CAVD include the abnormal accumulation of different lipid species and inflammatory cells in explanted human pathologic samples [5].

Immunity, both innate and adaptive, has been shown to play an important role in different chronic disorders including atherosclerosis. In CAVD, accumulating evidence clearly indicates that inflammation is involved in the development and possibly in the progression of the disease process [6]. Innate response to different factors has been shown to promote the mineralization of valve interstitial cells (VICs) (Figure 1), the main cellular component of the aortic valve. On the other hand, emerging evidence suggests that specific adaptive immunity could play a substantial role in orchestrating an immune response during CAVD (Figure 1). In this review, we describe, at the molecular and cellular levels, the role of immunity in CAVD.

Figure 1: Scheme showing the interaction between inflammatory cells and valve interstitial cells (VICs) and its role during CAVD.

2. Pathobiology of CAVD: An Overview

The aortic valve is normally a thin structure that accomplishes the important task of promoting the unidirectional blood flow from the left ventricle to the aorta. The histological structure of the aortic valve is classically divided into three different layers: the fibrosa, the spongiosa, and the ventricularis. The fibrosa and the ventricularis are the outermost external layers that, respectively, face the aorta and the left ventricle in diastole. The fibrosa mostly contains collagen fibers with dispersed VICs, whereas the ventricularis has a high content of elastic fibers and is populated by both VICs and smooth muscle cells (SMCs). The central layer, the spongiosa, has a high content in glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) and is thought to play an important role in the biomechanical properties of the aortic valve in absorbing a part of the mechanical load during the cardiac cycle [7, 8]. The aortic valve is covered with an endothelium and studies have highlighted that the aortic and ventricular endothelium have different biological properties, which may impact on the development of CAVD [9].

The microscopic analyses of human mineralized aortic valves, obtained from surgeries, have revealed some important key features of CAVD. First, lipids infiltrate the valve tissue often in the vicinity of mineralized areas [10]. Second, dense inflammatory infiltrates are present in some valves where oxidized lipids and ectopic mineralization are observed [6, 11]. Three, in about 15% of mineralized aortic valves osteogenic metaplasia is observed [12]. Coté et al. showed in 285 mineralized valves that the presence of dense chronic inflammatory infiltrates, present in 28% of valves, was associated with osseous metaplasia, neovascularization, and a higher level of tissue remodeling [6]. Furthermore, the density of leukocytes in mineralized aortic valves was associated with a faster progression rate of aortic stenosis. Hence, these data suggest that CAVD has possibly important relationships with inflammation.

3. NF-Kappa B Pathway and CAVD

3.1. Regulation of the NF-κB Pathway

The nuclear factor-κ B (NF-κB) is at the center stage of inflammation. The NF-κB pathway is classically divided into the canonical and noncanonical cascades. The canonical pathway, which is activated by tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and IL-1β among others, relies on activation of the heterodimer formed by p65 (RelA) and p50, which control the expression of several genes involved in the inflammatory response [13]. Upstream, the inhibitor of IκB kinase (IKK), controls the activation of the cascade. IKK is a multisubunit complex, which consists of IKKα, IKKβ, and IKKγ (NEMO) [14]. IKKβ catalytic activity is promoted by IKKγ, a regulatory protein that promotes activity of the IKK complex. In turn, the IKK complex phosphorylates IκBα on Ser residues 32 and 36. As a result, IκBα is targeted for degradation and the p65/p50 heterodimer is liberated from the cytosol and migrates to the nucleus where it controls the expression of target genes [15]. It is worth underlining that posttranscriptional modification of p65 subunit is also important to control the nuclear translocation and transcriptional activities. Twelve phosphosites for p65 have been described so far and have been shown to either enhance or decrease transcriptional activity in a gene-specific and possibly cell-specific manner [16]. For instance, in U937 macrophages stimulated with LPS, Ser 536 phosphorylated p65 is specifically recruited on IL-8 promoter and not on IL-6 and TNF-α promoters [17]. Phosphorylation of Ser 276 on p65 by the catalytic unit of protein kinas A (PKAc) has been shown to promote the acetylation of p65 and to allow a stable association with its cofactors CREB-binding protein/p300 and chromatin targets [18]. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to act as cofactor in PKAc-mediated phosphorylation on Ser 276 of p65 [19]. Of note, ROS are generated in mineralized aortic valves and promote the expression of osteogenic genes [20]. On the other hand, the noncanonical pathway relies on the phosphorylation of IKKα by its upstream kinase NF-κB-inducing kinase (NIK/MEKK14) and is independent from IKKγ [21]. Activation of this pathway by different signals, such as lymphotoxin B, CD40L, or B cell activating factor, promotes the nuclear translocation of RelB/p52 [22].

3.2. Phosphate and Activation of the NF-κB Cascade

By producing a high level of cytokines VICs play a crucial role in the regulation of inflammation. In explanted human mineralized aortic valves the levels of phosphorylated IκB (Ser 32) are increased significantly [23]. One fact, which is often underappreciated, is that phosphate (Pi) is an important promoter of inflammation in isolated VICs [23]. Phosphates are produced in fairly good amounts by VICs during mineralization owing to a high expression of nucleotide metabolizing enzymes, the ectonucleotidases [24]. During the mineralization of the aortic valve, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and ectonucleotide phosphodiesterase/pyrophosphatase-1 (ENPP1) are overexpressed. The ectonucleotidases generate Pi at the cell membrane [2527]. In turn, Pi is internalized by VICs through the sodium-dependent phosphate cotransporter Pit1 (SLC20A1), which is overexpressed in stenotic aortic valves [28]. Though the molecular details are lacking, the intracellular channelling of Pi is associated with a lower level of Akt, a kinase involved in cell survival. We recently identified that Akt prevents the activation of the NF-κB pathway in VICs [23]. Also, the overexpression of ectonucleotidases contributes to the depletion of the extracellular levels of nucleotides, which, in turn, decrease the signalling through the P2Y2 receptor (P2Y2R) [24]. In VICs, secretion of ATP gives a survival signal through the P2Y2R and Akt. Hence, a lower signalling through Akt promotes a sustained activation of the NF-κB pathway. The mechanism whereby Akt decreases NF-κB signalling in VICs remains to be fully investigated, but overexpression of Akt in VICs prevents the nuclear translocation of NF-κB-p65 in response to phosphate and inhibits the mineralization of cell cultures [23].

3.3. IL-6 Regulates the Mineralization of the Aortic Valve

One important target of NF-κB-p65 is interleukin-6 (IL-6), a pleiotropic cytokine often used as a blood plasma marker of inflammation and cardiovascular risk [29]. However, little is known on the role of IL-6 in CAVD. By using a whole-genome transcriptomic approach El Husseini et al. identified that, among the family of cytokines that signal through gp130, IL-6 is highly expressed in mineralized aortic valves [23]. Evidence indicates that the NF-κB pathway is activated in human explanted aortic valves and thus directly contributes to the secretion of IL-6. IL-6 is produced and secreted in large amounts by VICs. As highlighted above several factors may contribute to promote the production of IL-6 by VICs. In this regard, a high activity of ectonucleotidases contributes to decreasing the signalling through Akt, which in VICs normally represses the NF-κB pathway [23]. Moreover, although not studied in VICs, it is possible that other factors including cytokines such as TNF-α and oxidized lipid species may also contribute to trigger the secretion of IL-6. In turn, IL-6 exerts an important control over the osteogenic transition of VICs through auto/paracrine effects. In this regard, silencing of IL-6 in VICs prevented phosphate-induced mineralization of cell cultures [23]. Moreover, the silencing of IL-6 in VICs abrogated the rise of osteogenic transcripts following a treatment with the phosphate-containing medium [23]. Conversely, treatment of VICs with exogenous IL-6 increased the expression of osteogenic genes severalfold. BMP2 is the gene which is the most highly upregulated following a treatment of VIC cultures with IL-6. Inhibition of BMP2 with Noggin, an antagonist of BMP2 and BMP4, prevented IL-6-induced mineralization of VICs [23]. Taken together, a high production of IL-6 by VICs is conducive to an osteogenic transition and mineralization of the aortic valve through a BMP2 pathway [23]. Recently, it has been identified that IL-6 promotes in the aortic valve the endothelial-mesenchymal transition (EndoMT) [30]. Hence, in the aortic valve it is possible that IL-6 increases the amount of mesenchymal cells with osteogenic properties through the EndoMT process. Of interest, in bone, IL-6 stimulates osteoclast activity. Of note, this effect is indirect as it needs the presence of osteoblasts. In this regard, IL-6 induces the expression of receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappa B ligand (RANKL) by osteoblasts whereby osteoclastogenesis is promoted [31]. Chronic and systemic elevation of IL-6 is one important feature of several clinical conditions, including obesity, which are linked with osteoporosis and a higher incidence of CAVD [32]. Hence, though it remains to be investigated it is possible that IL-6 explains, at least in part, the so-called calcification paradox, where bone demineralization occurs at the same time that valvular/vascular mineralization develops (Figure 2).

Figure 2: The calcification paradox could be explained by interleukin-6 (IL-6), which mediates the mineralization of the aortic valve and in bone activates osteoclastogenesis.
3.4. TNF Family of Cytokines

TNF-α strongly activates the canonical NF-κB pathway and promotes the mineralization of VICs [33, 34]. TNF-α is first synthesized as a type II transmembrane protein, which upon cleavage by TNF-α converting enzyme (TACE) is released in the extracellular space [35]. It is produced by different cells including monocytes/macrophages, smooth muscle cells, and adipocytes among others. When stimulated, the ubiquitous TNF receptor 1 (TNFR1) activates and recruits TNFR-associated death domain (TRADD), which, in turn, recruits the Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD) [36, 37]. As a result, FADD activates caspase-3 and caspase-8. Therefore, though not fully investigated, it is possible that TNF-α-induced mineralization of VIC culture is dependent on an apoptotic process. To this effect, apoptosis is one important process involved in the mineralization of the aortic valve [24]. Apoptotic bodies derived from plasma membrane and rich in ectonucleotidases promote the nucleation of hydroxyapatite and the formation of spheroid mineralized microparticles (2–5 μm), which incidentally are the basic unit of mineralized material formed in CAVD [4, 38]. On the other hand, in response to TNF-α, TNFR1 may also recruit a receptor associated complex formed by TNF receptor associated factors (TRAF) and TRADD proteins, which activates transforming growth factor β activated kinase-1 (TAK1) [39]. TAK1 phosphorylates IKKβ and triggers activation of NF-κB. In vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs), TNF-α induces the expression of Msx2, a homeobox transcription factor involved in osteogenic transition [40]. Msx2 is increased in mineralized aortic valve and promotes activation of the Wnt pathway, which is by the way involved in the development of CAVD [41]. TNF-α has also crosstalk with interleukin-1β (IL-1β). In this regard, in mice deficient for the IL-1 receptor antagonist, IL-1RA, the circulating levels of TNF-α are increased and the aortic valve is thickened [42]. The double knockout mice IL-1RA−/− TNF-α−/−, however, do not develop fibrosis of the aortic valve. On the other hand, in isolated VICs, IL-1β induces the expression of MMP-1, suggesting that it may participate in the remodelling process of the aortic valve [43]. Hence, it is likely that IL-1β and TNF-α have reciprocal crosstalk, which promotes CAVD in mice. Recently, the expression of TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has been shown to be elevated in mineralized aortic valves [44]. TRAIL, a member of the TNF superfamily, has been shown to promote apoptosis-mediated mineralization of VICs through the death receptor 4, which is overexpressed by VICs during mineralization. Hence, overexpression of the TNF family of cytokines in CAVD plays an important role in promoting fibrosis/mineralization of the aortic valve through both apoptosis and an osteogenic program.

RANKL is expressed by activated CD4+, CD8+ cells, osteoblast, and bone marrow stromal cells. It is a type 2 transmembrane protein, which can be cleaved by metalloproteinase [45]. RANKL binds to its receptor RANK whereby TNFR-associated factors 2 and 6 (TRAFF2-6) are recruited [46]. This leads to a sequence of events that mediates the activation of AP-1, c-Src, and c-Cbl [47]. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a soluble decoy receptor for RANKL and is thus a negative regulator of RANKL signaling [48]. In bone, stimulation of RANK activates osteoclast activity. The OPG−/− mice develop osteoporosis and vascular calcification [49]. In the aortic valve, a study based on immunodetection has revealed that RANKL is overexpressed in mineralized aortic valves, whereas the expression of OPG is decreased in the same valves [50]. In isolated VIC cultures, the stimulation of cells with RANKL activates mineralization and the expression of ALP [50]. In LDLR−/− mice under high fat diet, the administration of OPG reduced mineralization of the aortic valve and decreased the expression of osteogenic genes, such as osterix and osteocalcin [51]. Taken together, these observations suggest that RANK signaling may play a permissive role in the development of CAVD.

3.5. Angiotensin II

The renin angiotensin system (RAS) is activated in patients with visceral obesity, a condition associated with the development of CAVD [32]. Studies have underscored that enzymes, which generate angiotensin II, are present in stenotic mineralized aortic valves [52]. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) is present in human explanted stenotic aortic valves and colocalizes with low-density lipoprotein (LDL). Experiments with isolated LDL fraction showed that ACE was present in this fraction, suggesting that the angiotensin II-generating enzyme is possibly transported in the aortic valve. Moreover, mastocytes producing chymase, an angiotensin II-generating enzyme, are present in mineralized aortic valves and their density correlates with several indices of disease severity [53, 54]. As such, both ACE and chymase contribute to produce angiotensin II in the aortic valve. Moreover, Côté et al. identified in prehypertensive men with CAVD that the circulating levels of angiotensin II correlate with the valvular mRNA levels of TNF-α and IL-6 [55]. Moreover, immunohistological analyses revealed in stenotic aortic valves that angiotensin II was present in the vicinity of mineralized nodules and colocalized with TNF-α and IL-6 [55]. Patients under a therapy with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) have a lower level of transcript encoding for IL-6 in their aortic valves [56]. Moreover, a retrospective study showed that ARBs are associated with a slower progression rate of aortic stenosis [57]. In mice, the administration of angiotensin II promoted the fibrotic remodelling of the aortic valve [58]. Also, the administration of olmesartan, an ARB, prevented the fibrotic remodelling of the aortic valve in the hypercholesterolemic rabbit [59]. Taken together, these data suggest that both systemic and valvular production of angiotensin II may contribute to CAVD. It is worth pointing out that angiotensin II is a potent activator of the NF-κB pathway via the type 1 angiotensin receptor (AT1AR). The activation of NF-κB by angiotensin II is relatively complex and differs from the signalling induced by TNF-α. Stimulation of AT1AR, a Gq protein coupled receptor, activates phospholipase C β (PLCβ), which generates inositol triphosphate and diacylglycerol (DAG). In turn, DAG activates a typical protein kinase C (PKC). PKC phosphorylates an adaptor protein of the membrane guanylate kinase family, CARMA3 [60]. Next, activated CARMA3 forms a complex with Bcl10 and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma translocation 1 (MALT1), which deubiquitylates several members of the activating pathway of NF-κB including IKKγ. As a result, the accumulation of IKKγ promotes the nuclear translocation of p65. Moreover, in VSMCs angiotensin II activates RhoA, which leads to the phosphorylation of p65 on Ser 536. It is suspected that NIK may mediate the phosphorylation of p65 on Ser 536 [61]. This sequence of events has possibly important repercussion as p65 Ser 536 is not inhibited by IκB [62]. This creates a nuclear pool of p65 Ser 536, which is recycled with the chromatin-bound promoter [63]. Hence, this chain of events promotes a sustained activation of target genes of p65. However, whether a similar pathway of activation is present in VICs remains to be explored.

4. Innate Immune Response to Oxidized Lipid Species and Ectopic Mineralization of the Aortic Valve

4.1. Interaction between Lipid Retention and Toll-Like Receptors

The Toll-like receptors (TLRs), which are expressed by VICs, play a key role in driving the inflammatory reaction in response to several stimuli. In this regard, several lipid species can activate TLRs. Early investigations of CAVD have pointed out that apoB, oxidized-low-density lipoproteins (ox-LDL), and Lp(a) infiltrate mineralized aortic valves [64]. So far, several factors have been identified to play a role in lipid infiltration/retention of the aortic valve. To this effect, a high proportion of circulating small, dense, LDL has been associated with a higher accumulation of ox-LDL in the aortic valve and with an elevated level of TNF-α [10]. Small, dense LDLs have a higher oxidation rate and have a greater ability to infiltrate tissues. Of note, the small, dense LDL phenotype is one key feature of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome (MetS), two important risk factors for the development and progression of CAVD [65]. Also, during CAVD a higher production of proteoglycans (PGs) may help to promote the retention of lipids. The expression of decorin is increased in aortic valves and histological studies showed a colocalization of decorin with lipoprotein lipase (LPL), which is secreted by macrophages [66]. Studies have highlighted that interaction between LPL and decorin promotes the retention of LDL. The expression of biglycan is increased in human pathological samples of CAVD and participates in the retention of lipids within the aortic valve [67]. Moreover, emerging evidence indicates that biglycan is a potent agonist of TLRs. In this regard, in isolated VICs biglycan stimulates TLR-2, which leads to the secretion of phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP). In turn, PLTP may associate with apoA1 of high-density lipoproteins (HDLs), which may impede their function, namely, the reverse cholesterol transport (RCT) [67]. More recently, biglycan has been shown to promote the osteogenic transition of VICs through TLR-2, the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2), and the NF-κB pathways [68]. In isolated VICs, biglycan also induced the secretion of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) [69]. Also, it is worth underlining that ox-LDL has been shown to stimulate TLR-4, whereby the mineralization of VICs is promoted [70]. Zeng et al. reported in VICs that Notch1 promotes the activation of the NF-κB pathway following stimulation of TLR-4 with bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [71]. The authors documented that the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) interacted with IκB kinaseα (IKKα) and in doing so promoted the nuclear translocation of p65 subunit of NF-κB. However, the molecular mechanism whereby the NICD may impact on IKK and its phosphorylation status was not examined. The same group also identified that ox-LDL promoted the secretion of Jagged 1 by VICs, which ultimately led to increased levels of NICD and activation of an osteogenic response [72]. However, it is worth highlighting that frameshift mutations of the NOTCH1 gene have been associated with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) and mineralization of the aortic valve [73]. Investigations have shown that the NICD, which is the intracellular portion of the Notch1 receptor cleaved by the γ-secretase following stimulation of the Notch receptor, activates the expression of the hairy family of repressors that inhibit the expression of BMP2 and Runx-2, respectively, a bone morphogen and master transcription factor involved in osteogenesis [74]. Hence, Notch1 delivers signals that prevent the osteogenic transition of VICs. The apparent discrepancy between studies that have investigated the role of Notch in CAVD may result from different cell culture conditions and may be context dependent. Further work is needed to explore the interactions between Notch, inflammation, and the mineralization of the aortic valve.

The retention of lipids in the extracellular matrix of the aortic valve is also promoted by the elongation of GAG chains, which is enhanced by transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) [75]. The retention of lipids in the aortic valve promotes, in turn, the oxidation of lipid species, which are potent agonists of the TLRs. During CAVD, the uncoupling of nitric oxide synthase (NOS) contributes to the increase of the oxidative stress [76]. Though the mechanisms of NOS uncoupling in the aortic valve have not been investigated, it is possible that a decreased bioavailability of NOS substrate, L-arginine, or cofactors, such as tetrahydrobiopterin, contribute to the increase of the production of ROS [77]. As a result, the increased production of ROS in mineralized aortic valves promotes the formation of lipid peroxidation products with proinflammatory activities. Recently, pathways leading to the production of highly reactive lipid species, derived from ox-LDL, have been identified and may play an important role in the immune response and the mineralization of the aortic valve.

4.2. Lp(a), Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2, and Inflammation-Mediated Mineralization of the Aortic Valve

In a genome-wide association study (GWAS), Thanassoulis et al. have recently identified that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the LPA gene encoding for Lp(a) were associated with CAVD [78]. Using a Mendelian randomization study design two other independent studies have since then corroborated the positive association between Lp(a) and CAVD [79, 80]. These studies thus suggest a causal role for Lp(a) in the development of CAVD. Though the physiological role of Lp(a) is largely unknown, it is well accepted that it is a major carrier of oxidized-phospholipids (ox-PLs) in the blood plasma [81]. Ox-PLs are potent stimulators of inflammation through their metabolism by phospholipase enzymes [82]. Mahmut et al. have recently discovered that lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2) is overexpressed in mineralized aortic valve [83]. Immunohistological analyses suggest that Lp-PLA2 is transported in the aortic valve by lipoproteins and also secreted by infiltrating macrophages. The transcript level of Lp-PLA2 in stenotic aortic valves correlated with several indices of tissue remodelling and mineralization of the aortic valve. Of note, ox-PLs are the natural substrates for Lp-PLA2 and are hydrolyzed into lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC), which are highly reactive and proinflammatory. In isolated VICs, LPC promoted the expression of ALP, ENPP1, and the sodium-phosphate cotransporter Pit1 [83]. Of note, the expressions of ALP, ENPP1, and Pit1 are increased in mineralized aortic valves and contribute actively to the mineralization process [28]. Hence, it is likely that ox-PLs transported by Lp(a) are transformed into LPC by Lp-PLA2 in the aortic valve, whereby inflammation and mineralization are triggered.

4.3. Lipoxygenase and Leukotrienes: Role in CAVD

Arachidonate is a polyunsaturated fatty acid (20 : 4), which is produced from phospholipids and the action of PLA2 and lipoprotein lipase (LPL), which are incidentally overexpressed in the aortic valve during CAVD [66, 84]. Arachidonate is a powerful metabolite that exerts an important control over inflammation. In mineralized aortic valve the expressions of 5-lipoxygenase (5-LO) and LTC4S are increased and correlate with echocardiographic indices of aortic stenosis severity [85]. Moreover, the expression of 5-LO was documented in both macrophages and VICs. The combined action of 5-LO and LTC4S generates leukotriene C(4) (LTC4), which has potent proinflammatory activities [86]. In vitro, LTC4 induced oxidative stress in VICs with the loss of mitochondrial membrane potential and the concomitant expression of BMP2 and BMP6 [85]. Hence, the expression of 5-LO by VICs promotes the production of leukotrienes, which constitute short acting messengers that drives inflammation of tissues. Whether the 5-LO pathway plays a crucial role in the mineralization of the aortic valve remains to be investigated.

4.4. Remodelling, Neoangiogenesis, and MMPs

The activation of innate immunity leads to the expression of several factors involved in tissue remodelling. TGF-β1, which is overexpressed in CAVD, activates VICs and promotes their transformation into secretory myofibroblast-like cells [87]. Of interest, the inhibition of serotoninergic receptor 5-H prevents TGF-β1-induced transformation of VICs into myofibroblast [88]. This latter finding may have pathobiological significance, since mast cells are present in mineralized aortic valves and may thus affect TGF-β signalling through the production of serotonin. One simple observation of explanted human aortic valves is that neoangiogenesis is associated with the development of CAVD. Of note, the density of neovessels correlates with the presence of chronic inflammatory infiltrates [6]. The expression of heat shock protein 60 (HSP60), a marker of inflammation, correlates with the development of neoangiogenesis in stenotic aortic valves [89]. In mineralized aortic valves, endothelial progenitor cells CD34+ are present in valvular tissue [90]. In mice defective for chondromodulin-1, a protein with antiangiogenic properties, there is a neovascularization of the aortic valve and mineralization of leaflets [91]. Though the role of angiogenesis in CAVD is not elucidated yet, one hypothesis is that it contributes to the recruitment of inflammatory cells in a positive feedback loop. Osteonectin (SPARC), a matricellular protein highly expressed in stenotic aortic valves, is cleaved by metalloproteinases into a proangiogenic peptide [90]. The expression of several MMPs, including MMP2-3 and MMP9, is elevated in mineralized aortic valves [92]. In addition, a recent study has identified that MMP12, which is a potent elastase, is overexpressed in stenotic aortic valves [93]. Also, in human mineralized aortic valves the expression of cathepsins K, V, and S is increased [94]. In apoE−/− mice with 5/6 nephrectomy, cathepsin S induced elastolysis and promoted the mineralization of the aortic valve [95]. These studies thus suggest that during the remodelling process elastic fibers fragments with osteogenic properties are generated and may participate in the mineralization of the aortic valve.

5. Adaptive Immunity

From the above discussion it is clear that there is an activation of innate immunity in CAVD. Though it has been observed more than a decade ago that CD4+ and CD8+ T cells infiltrate the aortic valve during CAVD, it is only recently that investigations have shown a clonal expansion of T cells in mineralized aortic valves. In a seminal work, Winchester et al. showed that the proportion of circulating CD3+ T cells expressing HLA-DR was increased in subjects with CAVD [96]. Also, the proportion of circulating CD8+ CD57+ T cell subset expressing HLA-DR was elevated during CAVD. These findings thus suggest that a subset of memory T cells is activated in patients with CAVD. In mineralized aortic valves, both bicuspid and tricuspid, the clonal expansions of the TCR repertoire were documented. Immunohistological analyses of explanted mineralized aortic valves showed that CD8+ CD28 null cells were present at the proximity of mineralized nodules [96, 97]. These data thus suggest that a systemic adaptive immunity, coupled to lymphocytic infiltration of the aortic valve, is activated during CAVD. Though the antigen(s) responsible for this response in CAVD remains to be determined, it is possible that oxidatively modified epitopes may play a role [98]. Several questions though remain to be studied with regard to the role of adaptive immunity in the development of CAVD. The identification of epitopes that induce an adaptive immune response, as well as the role of this response in fibrocalcific remodelling of the aortic valve, remains to be explored.

6. An Integrative View of Inflammation in CAVD and Potential Therapeutic Opportunities

Several factors may promote inflammation in CAVD, but an important culprit is possibly the oxidized lipids [99]. In this regard, ox-LDL is a potent trigger of inflammation through the Toll-like receptors. Also, ox-LDL generates epitopes, which may activate adaptive immunity [100]. In addition, the overexpression of Lp-PLA2, LPL, and 5-LO in CAVD contributes to generate bioactive lipid-derived species, which amplify inflammation. These factors along with angiotensin II contribute to the activation of the NF-κB cascade. The activation of NF-κB in CAVD is substantiated by an elevated level of phosphorylated IκBα (Ser32) along with the overexpression of target genes such as IL-6 [23]. In this scheme of things, it is possible that NF-κB represents a hub of signalling, which may drive, at least in part, the fibrocalcific remodelling process of the aortic valve. Different therapeutic alternatives could be examined in order to prevent the progression of CAVD. In this regard, investigations to decrease activation of the RAS or blocking enzyme pathways that promote the production of highly reactive lipid species are needed. The recent discovery that IL-6 may represent an effector cytokine in promoting the osteogenic transition of VICs warrants further investigation. The use of monoclonal antibodies directed against TNF-α or IL-6 could be examined in preclinical animal models. The cardiovascular inflammation reduction trial (CIRT) will examine if the administration of methotrexate can reduce cardiovascular events [101]. This study will randomize 7000 patients to a placebo or methotrexate. Though this study is not designed and powered to study CAVD, it will examine as a secondary outcome the rate of CAVD in both arms. Though the mechanism by which methotrexate reduces inflammation remains, to some extent, obscure, in the hypercholesterolemic rabbit, it decreased the size of atherosclerotic plaques and in vitro it reduced the expression of TNF-α, IL1β, and CXCL2 in human umbilical vein endothelial cells treated with TNF-α [102]. The repositioning of drugs with an anti-inflammatory effect in CAVD is a potential therapeutic avenue, which needs further exploration [103]. However, basic and translational works are clearly needed in this field in order to tease out the key underpinning processes that link immunity with CAVD.

7. Conclusion

Research in the last several years has clearly identified that CAVD is an active disorder, which has an immune component. Both innate and adaptive immunity are activated during CAVD. Several upstream factors converge on the NF-κB. Oxidized lipid species and angiotensin II promote activation of the NF-κB cascade, which increases the expression of different cytokines. Both apoptosis-mediated mineralization and osteogenic transition of VICs are activated by NF-κB and promote the ectopic mineralization of the aortic valves. Recent discoveries linking the immune response with CAVD should spur more translational work in order to develop novel therapeutic alternatives for this chronic process affecting our aging societies.

Disclosure

Patrick Mathieu has patent application for the use of ectonucleotidases and Lp-PLA2 inhibitors in the treatment of CAVD.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

The work of the authors is supported by HSFC grant, CIHR Grants MOP245048 and MOP114893, and the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute Fund. Patrick Mathieu is a research scholar from the Fonds de Recherche en Santé du Québec, Montreal, QC, Canada.

References

  1. P. Mathieu, M. C. Boulanger, and R. Bouchareb, “Molecular biology of calcific aortic valve disease: towards new pharmacological therapies,” Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 851–862, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  2. N. M. Rajamannan, F. J. Evans, E. Aikawa et al., “Calcific aortic valve disease: not simply a degenerative process: a review and agenda for research from the national heart and lung and blood institute aortic stenosis working group. Executive summary: calcific aortic valve disease—2011 update,” Circulation, vol. 124, no. 16, pp. 1783–1791, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. V. Persy and P. D'Haese, “Vascular calcification and bone disease: the calcification paradox,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 405–416, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. R. Bouchareb, M.-C. Boulanger, D. Fournier, P. Pibarot, Y. Messaddeq, and P. Mathieu, “Mechanical strain induces the production of spheroid mineralized microparticles in the aortic valve through a RhoA/ROCK-dependent mechanism,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 67, pp. 49–59, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. D. O'Brien, D. D. Reichenbach, S. M. Marcovina, J. Kuusisto, C. E. Alpers, and C. M. Otto, “Apolipoproteins B, (a), and E accumulate in the morphologically early lesion of 'degenerative' valvular aortic stenosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 523–532, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. N. Coté, A. Mahmut, Y. Bosse et al., “Inflammation is associated with the remodeling of calcific aortic valve disease,” Inflammation, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 573–581, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. J.-H. Chen and C. A. Simmons, “Cell-matrix interactions in the pathobiology of calcific aortic valve disease: critical roles for matricellular, matricrine, and matrix mechanics cues,” Circulation Research, vol. 108, no. 12, pp. 1510–1524, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. T. Butcher, C. A. Simmons, and J. N. Warnock, “Mechanobiology of the aortic heart valve,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 62–73, 2008. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. F. Davies, A. G. Passerini, and C. A. Simmons, “Aortic valve: turning over a new leaf(let) in endothelial phenotypic heterogeneity,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 24, no. 8, pp. 1331–1333, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. D. Mohty, P. Pibarot, J.-P. Després et al., “Association between plasma LDL particle size, valvular accumulation of oxidized LDL, and inflammation in patients with aortic stenosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 187–193, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. M. Otto, J. Kuusisto, D. D. Reichenbach, A. M. Gown, and K. D. O'Brien, “Characterization of the early lesion of 'degenerative' valvular aortic stenosis: histological and immunohistochemical studies,” Circulation, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 844–853, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. I. Steiner, P. Kašparová, A. Kohout, and J. Dominik, “Bone formation in cardiac valves: a histopathological study of 128 cases,” Virchows Archiv, vol. 450, no. 6, pp. 653–657, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. R. Brasier, “The nuclear factor-B-interleukin-6 signalling pathway mediating vascular inflammation,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 211–218, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. F. Liu, Y. Xia, A. S. Parker, and I. M. Verma, “IKK biology,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 246, no. 1, pp. 239–253, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. A. A. Beg, T. S. Finco, P. V. Nantermet, and A. S. Baldwin Jr., “Tumor necrosis factor and interleukin-1 lead to phosphorylation and loss of IκBα: a mechanism for NF-κB activation,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 3301–3310, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. K. Hochrainer, G. Racchumi, and J. Anrather, “Site-specific phosphorylation of the p65 protein subunit mediates selective gene expression by differential NF-κB and RNA polymerase II promoter recruitment,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 288, no. 1, pp. 285–293, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. C. Ghosh, S. Ramaswami, A. Juvekar et al., “Gene-specific repression of proinflammatory cytokines in stimulated human macrophages by nuclear IκBα,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 185, no. 6, pp. 3685–3693, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. H. Zhong, R. E. Voll, and S. Ghosh, “Phosphorylation of NF-κB p65 by PKA stimulates transcriptional activity by promoting a novel bivalent interaction with the coactivator CBP/p300,” Molecular Cell, vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 661–671, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. Jamaluddin, S. Wang, I. Boldogh, B. Tian, and A. R. Brasier, “TNF-α-induced NF-κB/RelA Ser276 phosphorylation and enhanceosome formation is mediated by an ROS-dependent PKAc pathway,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 19, no. 7, pp. 1419–1433, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. E. Branchetti, R. Sainger, P. Poggio et al., “Antioxidant enzymes reduce DNA damage and early activation of valvular interstitial cells in aortic valve sclerosis,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. e66–e74, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Xiao, A. Fong, and S.-C. Sun, “Induction of p100 processing by NF-κB-inducing kinase involves docking IκB kinase α (IKKα) to p100 and IKKα-mediated phosphorylation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 279, no. 29, pp. 30099–30105, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. D. Morrison, W. Reiley, M. Zhang, and S.-C. Sun, “An atypical Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) receptor-associated factor-binding motif of B cell-activating factor belonging to the TNF Family (BAFF) receptor mediates induction of the noncanonical NF-κB signaling pathway,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 11, pp. 10018–10024, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. El Husseini, M.-C. Boulanger, A. Mahmut et al., “P2Y2 receptor represses IL-6 expression by valve interstitial cells through Akt: implication for calcific aortic valve disease,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 72, pp. 146–156, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. Côté, D. El Husseini, A. Pépin et al., “ATP acts as a survival signal and prevents the mineralization of aortic valve,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 1191–1202, May 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  25. P. Mathieu, P. Voisine, A. Pépin, R. Shetty, N. Savard, and F. Dagenais, “Calcification of human valve interstitial cells is dependent on alkaline phosphatase activity,” Journal of Heart Valve Disease, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 353–357, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. N. Côté, D. El Husseini, A. Pépin et al., “Inhibition of ectonucleotidase with ARL67156 prevents the development of calcific aortic valve disease in warfarin-treated rats,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 689, no. 1–3, pp. 139–146, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. P. Mathieu, “Pharmacology of ectonucleotidases: relevance for the treatment of cardiovascular disorders,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 696, no. 1–3, pp. 1–4, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. D. El Husseini, M.-C. Boulanger, D. Fournier et al., “High expression of the Pi-transporter SLC20A1/Pit1 in calcific aortic valve disease promotes mineralization through regulation of Akt-1,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 1, Article ID e53393, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. P. Mathieu, I. Lemieux, and J.-P. Després, “Obesity, inflammation, and cardiovascular risk,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 407–416, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. G. J. Mahler, E. J. Farrar, and J. T. Butcher, “Inflammatory cytokines promote mesenchymal transformation in embryonic and adult valve endothelial cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 121–130, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. T. Wada, T. Nakashima, N. Hiroshi, and J. M. Penninger, “RANKL-RANK signaling in osteoclastogenesis and bone disease,” Trends in Molecular Medicine, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 17–25, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. P. Mathieu, P. Poirier, P. Pibarot, I. Lemieux, and J.-P. Després, “Visceral obesity the link among inflammation, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease,” Hypertension, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 577–584, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. Z. Yu, K. Seya, K. Daitoku, S. Motomura, I. Fukuda, and K.-I. Furukawa, “Tumor necrosis factor-α accelerates the calcification of human aortic valve interstitial cells obtained from patients with calcific aortic valve stenosis via the BMP2-Dlx5 pathway,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 337, no. 1, pp. 16–23, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. J. J. Kaden, R. Kiliç, A. Sarikoç et al., “Tumor necrosis factor alpha promotes an osteoblast-like phenotype in human aortic valve myofibroblasts: a potential regulatory mechanism of valvular calcification,” International Journal of Molecular Medicine, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 869–872, 2005. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. R. A. Black, C. T. Rauch, C. J. Kozlosky et al., “A metalloproteinase disintegrin that releases tumour-necrosis factor-α from cells,” Nature, vol. 385, no. 6618, pp. 729–733, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. H. Hsu, J. Xiong, and D. V. Goeddel, “The TNF receptor 1-associated protein TRADD signals cell death and NF-κB activation,” Cell, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 495–504, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. H. Hsu, H.-B. Shu, M.-G. Pan, and D. V. Goeddel, “TRADD-TRAF2 and TRADD-FADD interactions define two distinct TNF receptor 1 signal transduction pathways,” Cell, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 299–308, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. S. Bertazzo, E. Gentleman, K. L. Cloyd, A. H. Chester, M. H. Yacoub, and M. M. Stevens, “Nano-analytical electron microscopy reveals fundamental insights into human cardiovascular tissue calcification,” Nature Materials, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 576–583, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. A. Adhikari, M. Xu, and Z. J. Chen, “Ubiquitin-mediated activation of TAK1 and IKK,” Oncogene, vol. 26, no. 22, pp. 3214–3226, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  40. H.-L. Lee, K. M. Woo, H.-M. Ryoo, and J.-H. Baek, “Tumor necrosis factor-α increases alkaline phosphatase expression in vascular smooth muscle cells via MSX2 induction,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 391, no. 1, pp. 1087–1092, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. Z. Al-Aly, J.-S. Shao, C.-F. Lai et al., “Aortic Msx2-Wnt calcification cascade is regulated by TNF-α-dependent signals in diabetic Ldlr−/− mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 27, no. 12, pp. 2589–2596, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. K. Isoda, T. Matsuki, H. Kondo, Y. Iwakura, and F. Ohsuzu, “Deficiency of interleukin-1 receptor antagonist induces aortic valve disease in BALB/c Mice,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 708–715, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. J. J. Kaden, C.-E. Dempfle, R. Grobholz et al., “Interleukin-1 beta promotes matrix metalloproteinase expression and cell proliferation in calcific aortic valve stenosis,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 205–211, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Galeone, G. Brunetti, A. Oranger et al., “Aortic valvular interstitial cells apoptosis and calcification are mediated by TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 296–304, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. L. Lum, B. R. Wong, R. Josien et al., “Evidence for a role of a tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)-converting enzyme-like protease in shedding of TRANCE, a TNF family member involved in osteoclastogenesis and dendritic cell survival,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 19, pp. 13613–13618, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. B. R. Wong, R. Josien, S. Y. Lee, M. Vologodskaia, R. M. Steinman, and Y. Choi, “The TRAF family of signal transducers mediates NF-κB activation by the TRANCE receptor,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 273, no. 43, pp. 28355–28359, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. B. R. Wong, D. Besser, N. Kim et al., “TRANCE, a TNF family member, activates Akt/PKB through a signaling complex involving TRAF6 and c-Src,” Molecular Cell, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 1041–1049, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. W. S. Simonet, D. L. Lacey, C. R. Dunstan et al., “Osteoprotegerin: a novel secreted protein involved in the regulation of bone density,” Cell, vol. 89, no. 2, pp. 309–319, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. N. Bucay, I. Sarosi, C. R. Dunstan et al., “Osteoprotegerin-deficient mice develop early onset osteoporosis and arterial calcification,” Genes and Development, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1260–1268, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. J. J. Kaden, S. Bickelhaupt, R. Grobholz et al., “Receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand and osteoprotegerin regulate aortic valve calcification,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 57–66, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. R. M. Weiss, D. D. Lund, Y. Chu et al., “Osteoprotegerin inhibits aortic valve calcification and preserves valve function in hypercholesterolemic mice,” PLoS ONE, vol. 8, no. 6, Article ID e65201, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. K. D. O'Brien, D. M. Shavelle, M. T. Caulfield et al., “Association of angiotensin-converting enzyme with low-density lipoprotein in aortic valvular lesions and in human plasma,” Circulation, vol. 106, no. 17, pp. 2224–2230, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. S. Helske, K. A. Lindstedt, M. Laine et al., “Induction of local angiotensin II-producing systems in stenotic aortic valves,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1859–1866, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. E. Wypasek, J. Natorska, G. Grudzień, G. Filip, J. Sadowski, and A. Undas, “Mast cells in human stenotic aortic valves are associated with the severity of stenosis,” Inflammation, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 449–456, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. N. Côté, P. Pibarot, A. Pépin et al., “Oxidized low-density lipoprotein, angiotensin II and increased waist cirumference are associated with valve inflammation in prehypertensive patients with aortic stenosis,” International Journal of Cardiology, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 444–449, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. N. Côté, A. Mahmut, D. Fournier et al., “Angiotensin receptor blockers are associated with reduced fibrosis and interleukin-6 expression in calcific aortic valve disease,” Pathobiology, vol. 81, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. R. Capoulade, M.-A. Clavel, P. Mathieu et al., “Impact of hypertension and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in aortic stenosis,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1262–1272, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. T. Fujisaka, M. Hoshiga, J. Hotchi et al., “Angiotensin II promotes aortic valve thickening independent of elevated blood pressure in apolipoprotein-E deficient mice,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 226, no. 1, pp. 82–87, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. K. Arishiro, M. Hoshiga, N. Negoro et al., “Angiotensin receptor-1 blocker inhibits atherosclerotic changes and endothelial disruption of the aortic valve in hypercholesterolemic rabbits,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 49, no. 13, pp. 1482–1489, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. L. M. McAllister-Lucas, J. Ruland, K. Siu et al., “CARMA3/Bcl10/MALT1-dependent NF-κB activation mediates angiotensin II-responsive inflammatory signaling in nonimmune cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 1, pp. 139–144, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. S. Choudhary, M. Lu, R. Cui, and A. R. Brasier, “Involvement of a novel Rac/RhoA guanosine triphosphatase-nuclear factor-κB inducing kinase signaling pathway mediating angiotensin II-induced RelA transactivation,” Molecular Endocrinology, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 2203–2217, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. C. Y. Sasaki, T. J. Barberi, P. Ghosh, and D. L. Longo, “Phosphorylation of Re1A/p65 on serine 536 defines an IκBα- independent NF-κB pathway,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 41, pp. 34538–34547, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. D. Bosisio, I. Marazzi, A. Agresti, N. Shimizu, M. E. Bianchi, and G. Natoli, “A hyper-dynamic equilibrium between promoter-bound and nucleoplasmic dimers controls NF-κB-dependent gene activity,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 798–810, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. Olsson, J. Thyberg, and J. Nilsson, “Presence of oxidized low density lipoprotein in nonrheumatic stenotic aortic valves,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 1218–1222, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. M. Briand, I. Lemieux, J. G. Dumesnil et al., “Metabolic syndrome negatively influences disease progression and prognosis in aortic stenosis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2229–2236, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. A. Mahmut, M.-C. Boulanger, D. Fournier et al., “Lipoprotein lipase in aortic valve stenosis is associated with lipid retention and remodelling,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 570–578, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. H. Derbali, Y. Bosse, N. Cote et al., “Increased biglycan in aortic valve stenosis leads to the overexpression of phospholipid transfer protein via toll-like receptor 2,” The American Journal of Pathology, vol. 176, no. 6, pp. 2638–2645, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. R. Song, Q. Zeng, L. Ao et al., “Biglycan induces the expression of osteogenic factors in human aortic valve interstitial cells via toll-like receptor-2,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 32, no. 11, pp. 2711–2720, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. R. Song, L. Ao, K.-S. Zhao et al., “Soluble biglycan induces the production of ICAM-1 and MCP-1 in human aortic valve interstitial cells through TLR2/4 and the ERK1/2 pathway,” Inflammation Research, vol. 63, no. 9, pp. 703–710, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. N. A. Nadlonek, J. H. Lee, M. J. Weyant, X. Meng, and D. A. Fullerton, “Ox-LDL induces PiT-1 expression in human aortic valve interstitial cells,” Journal of Surgical Research, vol. 184, no. 1, pp. 6–9, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. Q. Zeng, R. Song, L. Ao et al., “Notch1 promotes the pro-osteogenic response of human aortic valve interstitial cells via modulation of erk1/2 and nuclear factor-κb activation,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1580–1590, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. Q. Zeng, C. Jin, L. Ao et al., “Cross-talk between the toll-like receptor 4 and notch1 pathways augments the inflammatory response in the interstitial cells of stenotic human aortic valves,” Circulation, vol. 126, no. 11, supplement 1, pp. S222–S230, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. V. Garg, A. N. Muth, J. F. Ransom et al., “Mutations in NOTCH1 cause aortic valve disease,” Nature, vol. 437, no. 7056, pp. 270–274, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. V. Nigam and D. Srivastava, “Notch1 represses osteogenic pathways in aortic valve cells,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 828–834, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. N. Osman, K. J. Grande-Allen, M. L. Ballinger et al., “Smad2-dependent glycosaminoglycan elongation in aortic valve interstitial cells enhances binding of LDL to proteoglycans,” Cardiovascular Pathology, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 146–155, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. J. D. Miller, Y. Chu, R. M. Brooks, W. E. Richenbacher, R. Peña-Silva, and D. D. Heistad, “Dysregulation of antioxidant mechanisms contributes to increased oxidative stress in calcific aortic valvular stenosis in humans,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 10, pp. 843–850, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. H. Li and U. Forstermann, “Uncoupling of endothelial NO synthase in atherosclerosis and vascular disease,” Current Opinion in Pharmacology, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 161–167, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. G. Thanassoulis, C. Y. Campbell, D. S. Owens et al., “Genetic associations with valvular calcification and aortic stenosis,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 368, no. 6, pp. 503–512, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. P. R. Kamstrup, A. Tybjærg-Hansen, and B. G. Nordestgaard, “Elevated lipoprotein(a) and risk of aortic valve stenosis in the general population,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 470–477, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. B. J. Arsenault, S. M. Boekholdt, M. P. Dube et al., “Lipoprotein(a) levels, genotype, and incident aortic valve stenosis: a prospective mendelian randomization study and replication in a case-control cohort,” Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 304–310, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. M.-Y. Hung, J. L. Witztum, and S. Tsimikas, “New therapeutic targets for calcific aortic valve stenosis: the lipoprotein(a)-lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2-oxidized phospholipid axis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 478–480, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. Y. I. Miller, S.-H. Choi, P. Wiesner et al., “Oxidation-specific epitopes are danger-associated molecular patterns recognized by pattern recognition receptors of innate immunity,” Circulation Research, vol. 108, no. 2, pp. 235–248, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. A. Mahmut, M.-C. Boulanger, D. El Husseini et al., “Elevated expression of lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 in calcific aortic valve disease: implications for valve mineralization,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 460–469, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. A. Mahmut, H. Mahjoub, M.-C. Boulanger et al., “Lp-PLA2 is associated with structural valve degeneration of bioprostheses,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 136–145, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. E. Nagy, D. C. Andersson, K. Caidahl et al., “Upregulation of the 5-lipoxygenase pathway in human aortic valves correlates with severity of stenosis and leads to leukotriene-induced effects on valvular myofibroblasts,” Circulation, vol. 123, no. 12, pp. 1316–1325, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. D. Poeckel and C. D. Funk, “The 5-lipoxygenase/leukotriene pathway in preclinical models of cardiovascular disease,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 86, no. 2, pp. 243–253, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. J. H. Chen, W. L. K. Chen, K. L. Sider, C. Y. Yip, and C. A. Simmons, “β-catenin mediates mechanically regulated, transforming growth factor-β1-induced myofibroblast differentiation of aortic valve interstitial cells,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 590–597, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. J. D. Hutcheson, L. M. Ryzhova, V. Setola, and W. D. Merryman, “5-HT2B antagonism arrests non-canonical TGF-β1-induced valvular myofibroblast differentiation,” Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 707–714, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. A. Mazzone, M. C. Epistolato, R. De Caterina et al., “Neoangiogenesis, T-lymphocyte infiltration, and heat shock protein-60 are biological hallmarks of an immunomediated inflammatory process in end-stage calcified aortic valve stenosis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1670–1676, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. A. Charest, A. Pépin, R. Shetty et al., “Distribution of SPARC during neovascularisation of degenerative aortic stenosis,” Heart, vol. 92, no. 12, pp. 1844–1849, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. Yoshioka, S. Yuasa, K. Matsumura et al., “Chondromodulin-I maintains cardiac valvular function by preventing angiogenesis,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 10, pp. 1151–1159, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. O. Fondard, D. Detaint, B. Iung et al., “Extracellular matrix remodelling in human aortic valve disease: the role of matrix metalloproteinases and their tissue inhibitors,” European Heart Journal, vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 1333–1341, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. I. Perrotta, E. Russo, C. Camastra et al., “New evidence for a critical role of elastin in calcification of native heart valves: Immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study with literature review,” Histopathology, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 504–513, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. S. Helske, S. Syväranta, K. A. Lindstedt et al., “Increased expression of elastolytic cathepsins S, K, and V and their inhibitor cystatin C in stenotic aortic valves,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 1791–1798, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. E. Aikawa, M. Aikawa, G. Rusanescu et al., “Arterial and aortic valve calcification abolished by elastolytic cathepsin S deficiency in chronic renal disease,” Circulation, vol. 119, no. 13, pp. 1785–1794, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. R. Winchester, M. Wiesendanger, W. O'Brien et al., “Circulating activated and effector memory T cells are associated with calcification and clonal expansions in bicuspid and tricuspid valves of calcific aortic stenosis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 1006–1014, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. H. D. Wu, M. S. Maurer, R. A. Friedman et al., “The lymphocytic infiltration in calcific aortic stenosis predominantly consists of clonally expanded T cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 178, no. 8, pp. 5329–5339, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. R. Wu, R. Giscombe, G. Holm, and A. K. Lefvert, “Induction of human cytotoxic T lymphocytes by oxidized low density lipoproteins,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 381–384, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. C. Cote, P. Pibarot, J. P. Despres et al., “Association between circulating oxidised low-density lipoprotein and fibrocalcific remodelling of the aortic valve in aortic stenosis,” Heart, vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1175–1180, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. S. Stemme, B. Faber, J. Holm, O. Wiklund, J. L. Witztum, and G. K. Hansson, “T lymphocytes from human atherosclerotic plaques recognize oxidized low density lipoprotein,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 9, pp. 3893–3897, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. P. M. Ridker, “Testing the inflammatory hypothesis of atherothrombosis: scientific rationale for the cardiovascular inflammation reduction trial (CIRT),” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 7, supplement 1, pp. 332–339, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. A. Bulgarelli, A. A. Martins Dias, B. Caramelli, and R. C. Maranhão, “Treatment with methotrexate inhibits atherogenesis in cholesterol-fed rabbits,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 308–314, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  103. M. R. Hurle, L. Yang, Q. Xie, D. K. Rajpal, P. Sanseau, and P. Agarwal, “Computational drug repositioning: from data to therapeutics,” Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 335–341, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus