Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2016 / Article
Special Issue

Clinical and Experimental Immunomodulation 2016

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2016 |Article ID 4789279 |

Ekaterina A. Ivanova, Alexander N. Orekhov, "Monocyte Activation in Immunopathology: Cellular Test for Development of Diagnostics and Therapy", Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2016, Article ID 4789279, 9 pages, 2016.

Monocyte Activation in Immunopathology: Cellular Test for Development of Diagnostics and Therapy

Academic Editor: Oscar Bottasso
Received02 Oct 2015
Revised20 Dec 2015
Accepted21 Dec 2015
Published18 Jan 2016


Several highly prevalent human diseases are associated with immunopathology. Alterations in the immune system are found in such life-threatening disorders as cancer and atherosclerosis. Monocyte activation followed by macrophage polarization is an important step in normal immune response to pathogens and other relevant stimuli. Depending on the nature of the activation signal, macrophages can acquire pro- or anti-inflammatory phenotypes that are characterized by the expression of distinct patterns of secreted cytokines and surface antigens. This process is disturbed in immunopathologies resulting in abnormal monocyte activation and/or bias of macrophage polarization towards one or the other phenotype. Such alterations could be used as important diagnostic markers and also as possible targets for the development of immunomodulating therapy. Recently developed cellular tests are designed to analyze the phenotype and activity of living cells circulating in patient’s bloodstream. Monocyte/macrophage activation test is a successful example of cellular test relevant for atherosclerosis and oncopathology. This test demonstrated changes in macrophage activation in subclinical atherosclerosis and breast cancer and could also be used for screening a panel of natural agents with immunomodulatory activity. Further development of cellular tests will allow broadening the scope of their clinical implication. Such tests may become useful tools for drug research and therapy optimization.

1. Introduction

Immunopathology is associated with the most common life-threatening disorders, including atherosclerosis and related cardiovascular diseases, cancer, and chronic inflammation. A number of diseases, such as lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, or HIV infections, are characterized by pronounced immunopathologies; others, such as atherosclerosis and cancer, by less obvious latent pathological changes in the immune system. Such changes may represent early events in the disease initiation and development and might therefore be especially interesting for timely diagnostics and for development of preventive treatment.

The role of the immune system dysfunction in cancer is currently well recognized [1]. Altered macrophage plasticity and polarization can contribute both to the malignancy development and to the tumor vascularization [2]. In that regard, comprehensive analysis of the macrophage population diversity would be necessary for developing adequate therapeutic approaches and monitoring the therapy efficiency.

Recent studies have revealed many aspects of the complex and important role of macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [3]. Formation of the atherosclerotic plaque begins with monocyte activation and transformation into macrophages that reside in the subendothelial area of the blood vessel wall and accumulate lipids in their cytoplasm becoming foam cells. This lipid trapping is performed by means of uncontrolled phagocytosis. At the same time, certain types of macrophages are implicated in tissue repair, and these cells have been found in regressing plaques in mouse models [4, 5]. Therefore, different types of macrophages are responsible for the plaque initiation, growth, and, eventually, regression [68]. Correspondingly, anti-inflammatory agents are considered as an important component of antiatherosclerotic therapy [9]. Here again, the analysis of macrophage phenotypic diversity could improve the understanding of the pathological process and assessment of the therapy efficiency.

According to current epidemiological data, atherosclerosis-related diseases and cancer are the two greatest contributors to the overall mortality in the developed countries [10, 11]. Given that these diseases are tightly associated with immunopathology, development of comprehensive diagnostic methods and therapeutic approaches to modulate the immune system appears to be of the greatest importance. However, the existing diagnostic methods are imperfect and their improvement remains challenging. Likewise, no drugs are available to date that allow targeted immune correction in atherosclerosis. It is clear that changes in cytokine expression and phenotypic features of macrophages may reflect the disease progression state. These features may therefore be used for monitoring the pathological process and treatment efficiency.

2. Cellular Tests for Diagnostics and Drug Research

In many pathological conditions, the analysis of different types of cells circulating in the bloodstream can provide valuable information about the disease progression. During the recent years, a number of cell types have been isolated and studied for possible application in diagnostics and drug development.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can be extracted from patient’s blood and used to analyze the expression of relevant genes and surface markers. For instance, successful isolation and molecular characterization have been described for metastatic breast cancer [12], metastatic colorectal cancer [13], and lung cancer [14]. This strategy is especially useful in cases of advanced metastatic cancer, where the patients could benefit from a personalized treatment. The analysis of CTCs has a great diagnostic potential but can also help in revealing the possible drug resistance of the tumor and designing the optimal therapy [15]. Many current studies are focused on the improvement of CTC-based analyses and their clinical implementation.

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are relatively easily obtainable cells that can be used for monitoring a wide spectrum of conditions and pathologies. The analysis of mRNA profiles of isolated PBMCs could be used for evaluation of metabolic changes [16]. PBMCs can also be kept in short-term culture and used for studying cytokine production induced by stimulation. For instance, changes in proinflammatory cytokine production by isolated PBMCs have been described in such conditions as allergies, alterations of immune response, and immunization [1719]. Studies on PBMCs have demonstrated that vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production was decreased in women with preeclampsia [20]. Isolated PBMCs can serve as a relevant system for testing various drugs, especially related to inflammation [21]. Recently, the potential of macrophage-based test system for diagnostics and treatment of atherosclerosis has been explored [22].

Atherosclerosis is associated with life-threatening cardiovascular diseases [7]. Atherosclerosis progression is usually slow, and the disease often remains asymptomatic until the ischemia of organs and tissues becomes evident. This may happen due to the obstruction of a blood vessel with growing atherosclerotic plaque or the embolism caused by a thrombus formed on a destabilized plaque. Therefore, the first manifestations of the disease are often lethal [23, 24]. Diagnostic of preclinical (asymptomatic) atherosclerosis is therefore especially important. However, it is hindered by the absence of clinical symptoms and complaints and by the fact that the spectrum of risk factors is very wide, including genetic predisposition, lifestyle and diet patterns, chronic inflammation, and metabolic factors. Immunopathology is likely to be one of the mechanisms underlying atherosclerosis development starting from the early stages, and its assessment can therefore have an important diagnostic value.

3. Monocyte/Macrophage Diversity and Functions

Monocytes and macrophages are the key players in the innate immune system. These cells can eliminate pathogens by phagocytosis, release of reactive oxygen species, production of proinflammatory cytokines, and modulation of the T-cell immune response [25]. Macrophages are present in all organs and tissues and represent the first line of immune defence, responsible for removal of foreign agents and pathogens. They participate in all stages of the inflammatory process. The pool of macrophages remains constant in every tissue, and the cells are renewed from the population of circulating monocytes [26], although the results of recent studies suggest that these cells are also capable of self-renewal [27]. It has been known for a long time that changes in the phagocytic activity of macrophages might be dependent on changes in the peripheral blood monocyte population, and alterations of the monocyte pool lead to various pathological conditions [28]. Proliferation of promonocytes, which can be stimulated by systemic inflammatory stimuli, leads to the increase of the number of circulating monocytes [29, 30]. Monocytes and macrophages, together with their precursors and dendritic cells, form the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) [31], although the identity of the dendritic cells remains disputed [32, 33]. The development, maintenance, differentiation, and function of MPS are regulated mostly by colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF-1) in homeostatic conditions [34] and by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) during inflammation [35]. Inflammatory signals and various pathological conditions, including atherosclerosis development, stimulate the inactive circulating monocytes to become activated macrophages that can be distinguished by their phenotypic properties. Macrophages can acquire different functional phenotypes influenced by the surrounding microenvironment in a process known as macrophage polarization.

Studies of macrophage population revealed significant heterogeneity and plasticity of this cell type. Reaching consensus on macrophage classification was challenging due to the high variety of activation types, dependence of the results on the particular experimental setup, and differences of macrophage activation profiles between humans and animal models. Recently, a group of leading immunologists have summarized the current knowledge on the issue and drawn recommendations for conducting and reporting the experiments involving macrophage polarization [36]. Initially, two main classes of macrophages, M1 and M2, have been defined which could be obtained by activation of macrophages by proinflammatory interferon γ (IFN-γ) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or by interleukin-4 (IL-4), respectively [3739]. A simplified scheme of macrophage polarization is presented in Figure 1.

M1 macrophages are characterized by the production of proinflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα), IL-1β, IL-6, IL-12, and proteolytic enzymes, as well as by the expression of Fc-γ receptors on the cell surface [40, 41]. Polarization towards the proinflammatory phenotype can be induced in vitro by toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands, including TNFα, lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and interferon γ (IFN-γ) that might also play a role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [42]. It has been demonstrated that M1 macrophages are present in the atherosclerotic plaques where they maintain the local inflammatory process and promote the extracellular matrix degradation contributing to the formation of unstable plaques that can induce thrombus formation and are therefore especially dangerous [4345].

The subpopulation of M2 macrophages was further divided into several subtypes depending on the activation stimuli (Figure 1): M2a (activated by IL-4), M2b (activated by immune complexes), and M2c (activated by IL-10) [46]. Each of these subtypes is characterized by a distinct pattern of cytokine and surface marker expression which can also vary between the species. It has been proposed therefore to refer to different subtypes of macrophages indicating the activation type (e.g., M(IL-4) instead of M2a) [36]. M2a macrophages have strong anti-inflammatory properties and can be regarded as tissue-repairing cells [47]. They have poor phagocytic capacity and participate in the formation of extracellular matrix by stimulating production of collagen. They express IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) and secrete CCL18, transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), and remodelling enzymes. M2b and M2c macrophages express different chemokine receptors, produce IL-10, and can modulate inflammation but do not synthesize the extracellular matrix and can therefore be regarded as regulatory macrophages [48]. Anti-inflammatory macrophages were also shown to express mannose receptor (CD206), stabilin-1, and decoy receptor IL-1RII on the surface [4951]. M2 phenotype can also be induced by T regulatory cells [52]. However, the heterogeneity of this population requires further studies and standardization of the nomenclature. For the sake of simplicity, later in this work, we will refer to the IL-4-activated M2a macrophages as “M2 phenotype.”

The production and release of the proinflammatory cytokines, such as IL-1β and IL-18, are dependent on the macrophage inflammasome status [53, 54]. Inflammasome is a caspase-activating complex formed by several proteins, including caspase-1, which is responsible for cytokine maturation. Active caspase-1 can also be released from the activated cells and may contribute to the damage of neighbouring cells [55]. The inflammasome activation has been reported in various pathological conditions and infections. In can be induced by danger- and pathogen-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs and PAMPs) [5659]. Importantly, inflammasome is activated in atherosclerosis in response to cholesterol accumulation in the blood vessel wall and formation of cholesterol crystals in foam cells [60]. On the other hand, atherogenesis can be associated with ongoing infections with various pathogens, such as Chlamydia pneumonia and Helicobacter pylori, which can induce the inflammasome activation [6163]. There might exist other factors that contribute to the inflammasome activation and atherosclerosis progression, including the formation of uric acid crystals [64] and impaired autophagy [65]. Therefore, the inflammasome activation and release of proinflammatory cytokines and caspase-1 are relevant for atherosclerosis progression and can be regarded as important markers of the pathological process.

4. Cellular Tests Based on Monocyte/Macrophage Phenotypic Changes in Atherosclerosis

Development of a reliable monocyte/macrophage-based functional test remains challenging due to several technical problems. Isolation of monocytes from blood can lead to their activation. A number of different isolation methods have been proposed during the recent years. The traditional method implies cell adhesion, which leads to monocytes activation and is therefore widely criticized. Another method is fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS), which is fast and accurate but requires labelling of cells with specific antibodies, which can also lead to activation. A pure fraction of monocytes/macrophages can be isolated using magnetic separation. In this method, unspecific activation can also occur due to possible phagocytosis of paramagnetic particles. So far, the only method that can extract nonactivated monocytes is elutriation [66, 67]. It requires, however, special equipment and is impossible to introduce into routine clinical practice. Because of these technical problems, recent studies focused on the identification of molecular markers that could substitute for functional tests in diagnostics of immunopathologies.

Studies of monocyte function include the assessment of their motility, adhesion, phagocytic activity, and low-density protein (LDL) uptake [68, 69]. Macrophages can take part in pathological processes via stimulation with circulating soluble activation factors, adhesion to the endothelium, and migration into the tissue where they meet local activation factors. The monocytes’ response to these stimuli depends on their priming in circulation and therefore can have a diagnostic potential. The analysis of macrophage pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotypic classes can provide important information on the disease progression, as has been demonstrated for atherosclerosis [22].

A monocyte/macrophage-based assay has recently been designed to evaluate changes in monocyte response to pro- and anti-inflammatory stimuli and to reveal possible bias of the macrophage polarization towards M1 or M2 phenotype. In this method, a pure population of blood monocytes was isolated using magnetic separation [49, 70] (Figure 2). The analysis of macrophage activity was performed by stimulating the cells with LPS, proinflammatory stimulus IFN-γ, and anti-inflammatory stimulus IL-4 [71]. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine production measurement was used as readout. Proinflammatory activity of macrophages was assessed by the levels of secreted TNFα and IL-1β and anti-inflammatory activity by the levels of CCL18 production and IL-1ra expression. Inflammasome activation can also be assessed in this experimental system by measuring the IL-1β expression at mRNA level and comparing the results with the amount of mature IL-1β detected by ELISA. Another evidence of inflammasome activation that can be used as readout is the release of active caspase-1 [55]. Expression and release of the inflammasome-dependent cytokines TNFα and IL-8 should also be measured to provide the control of inflammasome activity. Further characterization of macrophages can be performed by analyzing such markers as MMR, CD163, TGF-RII, CSFR1, TNFRI, CD16, CD32, CD64, and stabilin-1, as well as the expression of TLR1, TLR2, and TLR4 at mRNA level and on the cell surface. Changes in the expression of these markers correlate with stimulation type and intensity. The described experimental system can provide important information on monocyte activation state and possible skew of the monocyte predisposition towards pro- or anti-inflammatory response. Apart from altered polarization towards one or the other phenotype, pathological conditions can be associated with other phenotypical alterations of monocytes/macrophage, including phagocytosis, migration, and proliferation. Alterations of macrophage phenotype and plasticity associated with atherosclerosis have recently been discussed in a comprehensive review [46].

The described method has been used to analyze activation of monocytes isolated from blood of healthy subjects (), atherosclerosis patients (), and breast cancer patients (). The obtained results demonstrated that production of proinflammatory TNFα was significantly lower in atherosclerosis patients and significantly higher in cancer patients in comparison to healthy subjects. On the other hand, production of anti-inflammatory CCL18 was decreased both in atherosclerosis and in cancer patients [22].

To evaluate the diagnostic potential of macrophages’ activation test in asymptomatic atherosclerosis, a study was performed on individuals with predisposition to atherosclerosis (, mean age years) and subclinical atherosclerosis (, mean age years) in comparison to healthy subjects (, mean age years). Predisposition to atherosclerosis and subclinical atherosclerosis were detected by measuring the age-adjusted carotid intima media thickness (cIMT). The analysis of TNFα and CCL18 production by stimulated macrophages revealed dramatic individual differences between the analyzed subjects that may reflect the individuals’ predisposition to immunopathology. Macrophages from subjects with subclinical atherosclerosis were characterized by especially low degree of activation in response to stimuli [22] (Figure 3). Therefore, the ability of macrophages to polarize towards pro- and anti-inflammatory phenotypes was decreased at early stages of atherosclerosis development, although the causative significance of this observation remains unclear.

5. Application of Cellular Tests for Drug Development

Changes of the immune system occur early in many pathological processes, opening the intriguing possibility that patients may benefit from a preventive treatment targeting the underlying immunopathology. Imbalanced macrophage polarization is observed in such conditions as atherosclerosis and cancer. Enhanced monocyte activation may lead to macrophage polarization towards pro- or anti-inflammatory phenotype leading to chronic inflammation and atherosclerosis or to oncopathologies, respectively [22]. Therefore, macrophage depolarization might be exploited for the development of preventive treatment [72]. For instance, it has been demonstrated that depolarization of macrophages from the M2 phenotype was associated with tumor regression [73].

To explore the potential of the macrophage activation test for drug development, the macrophage depolarization effects of herbal extracts were studied on cells obtained from healthy subjects. Plant extracts with immune-modulating properties are widely used in traditional medicine, but their therapeutic potential for modern clinical practice remains to be investigated. The extracts of the following plants with known anti-inflammatory activity were included into the study: flowers of hawthorn (Crataegus sp.), elderberry (Sambucus nigra), and calendula (Calendula officinalis) and herbs of St. John’s wort (Hypericum perforatum) and violet (Viola sp.). Cultured macrophages were exposed to pro- and anti-inflammatory stimuli (IFN-γ and IL-4, resp.), and TNFα and CCL18 production was measured after 6 days. TNFα secretion by IFN-γ-stimulated macrophages treated with elderberry, calendula, and violet extracts was 10–13-fold higher than that of untreated stimulated macrophages. On the other hand, hawthorn and St. John’s wort extracts significantly inhibited TNFα secretion. Extracts of hawthorn and St. John’s wort also suppressed the secretion of CCL18 by IL-4-stimulated macrophages (Figure 4). Therefore, St. John’s wort and hawthorn extracts appear to be natural agents with immune-modulatory properties that could be used for macrophage depolarization. Importantly, natural agents are characterized by relatively good tolerance and minimal side effects and are therefore especially suitable for long-term therapy, which is necessary for successful immune correction.

One of the therapeutic strategies for treatment of atherosclerosis is the inhibition of intracellular cholesterol accumulation. It is well established that hypercholesterolemia is a potent risk factor for atherosclerosis development [7476]. However, the accumulating evidence demonstrates that atherogenic potential depends not so much on the total level of cholesterol as on the nature of cholesterol-containing lipoprotein particles that serve as a source of cholesterol storage in the arterial wall. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and especially its modifications, such as small dense, oxidized, desialylated, or electronegative LDL, play the key role in atherogenesis, and their levels positively correlate with the disease progression [7779]. Moreover, modified LDL particles can provoke formation of autoantibodies that initiate the inflammatory response and form highly atherogenic immune complexes with LDL particles [80]. In that regard, LDL composition of blood plasma may be a decisive factor that triggers atherogenesis. The ability of blood serum to induce cholesterol accumulation is referred to as serum atherogenicity. It has been previously demonstrated that serum obtained from atherosclerosis patients caused cholesterol accumulation in cultured cells and therefore was highly atherogenic [81].

Primary culture of human aorta cells can be a useful system for testing various antiatherosclerotic substances. Using this system, atherogenic properties of patient’s blood serum can be analyzed before and after drug administration to assess its therapeutic potential [8284]. Antiatherogenic activity of hawthorn and St. John’s wort extracts was tested using the described ex vivo model. Serum from study participants was added to cultured subendothelial intimal cells derived from uninvolved human aorta at concentration of 10%, and cholesterol accumulation was measured after 24 h using a previously established method [82]. It was demonstrated that blood serum atherogenicity decreased in study subjects treated with a single dose of hawthorn extract. The observed decrease was 73% and 83% after 2 and 4 hours, respectively, in comparison to the baseline (Figure 5). These results indicate that hawthorn extract may be regarded as a potent antiatherosclerotic agent. On the other hand, St. John’s wort extract had no statistically significant effect on cellular cholesterol accumulation.

Taken together, the obtained results demonstrate that the combination of hawthorn and St. John’s wort extracts appears promising for the development of antiatherosclerosis therapy. St. John’s wort extract was a potent macrophage depolarizing agent, and hawthorn was demonstrated to reduce the serum atherogenicity. Further studies employing macrophage-based cellular test systems will allow identification of novel agents with therapeutic potential.

6. Conclusion

Monocyte/macrophage-based test system is a versatile tool to detect immunopathology, including increased monocyte activation and altered polarization of macrophages towards pro- or anti-inflammatory phenotypes. Alterations in monocyte activation and imbalance in macrophage polarization can be associated with a variety of pathological conditions, including different types of cancer and atherosclerosis. Therefore, the development of immunomodulating therapy might contribute significantly to the improvement of the existing treatment strategies. However, the complexity of the immunopathology requires flexible and reliable methods for diagnostics and monitoring of treatment efficiency. The monocyte/macrophage activation test is one of such methods. It was proven to be suitable for the analysis of immunopathology in subclinical atherosclerosis and breast cancer. This method can also be applied for studying numerous other pathologies, where monocyte/macrophage activation is implicated, including other types of cancer, chronic inflammation, and autoimmune disorders. Given the broad spectrum of cytokines that may be analyzed, the described method can be improved to perform a more detailed study of macrophage activation. The application of monocyte/macrophage activation test for drug research was illustrated by screening a series of medicinal plant extracts for antiatherosclerotic activity. Study of macrophage polarization revealed a potent immunomodulatory activity of hawthorn and St. John’s wort extracts that might be beneficial for treatment and prevention of atherosclerosis. Together, these results demonstrate the possibilities of macrophage-based cellular tests for diagnostics and drug research in conditions associated with immunopathology.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.


This work was supported by the Russian Scientific Foundation (Grant no. 14-15-00112).


  1. F. Balkwill and A. Mantovani, “Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow?” The Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9255, pp. 539–545, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. K. Biswas and A. Mantovani, “Macrophage plasticity and interaction with lymphocyte subsets: cancer as a paradigm,” Nature Immunology, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 889–896, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Peled and E. A. Fisher, “Dynamic aspects of macrophage polarization during atherosclerosis progression and regression,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, no. 579, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. J. E. Feig, S. Parathath, J. X. Rong et al., “Reversal of hyperlipidemia with a genetic switch favorably affects the content and inflammatory state of macrophages in atherosclerotic plaques,” Circulation, vol. 123, no. 9, pp. 989–998, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. E. Feig, J. X. Rong, R. Shamir et al., “HDL promotes rapid atherosclerosis regression in mice and alters inflammatory properties of plaque monocyte-derived cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 17, pp. 7166–7171, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. R. Ross, “Atherosclerosis—an inflammatory disease,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 2, pp. 115–126, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Weber and H. Noels, “Atherosclerosis: current pathogenesis and therapeutic options,” Nature Medicine, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 1410–1422, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. G. K. Hansson and A. Hermansson, “The immune system in atherosclerosis,” Nature Immunology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 204–212, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Klingenberg and G. K. Hansson, “Treating inflammation in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: emerging therapies,” European Heart Journal, vol. 30, no. 23, pp. 2838–2844, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. R. Beaglehole and R. Bonita, “Global public health: a scorecard,” The Lancet, vol. 372, no. 9654, pp. 1988–1996, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. F. Fries, “Strategies for reduction of morbidity,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, vol. 55, supplement 6, pp. 1257S–1262S, 1992. View at: Google Scholar
  12. B. Mostert, A. M. Sieuwerts, J. Kraan et al., “Gene expression profiles in circulating tumor cells to predict prognosis in metastatic breast cancer patients,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 510–516, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. B. Mostert, A. M. Sieuwerts, J. Bolt-de Vries et al., “mRNA expression profiles in circulating tumor cells of metastatic colorectal cancer patients,” Molecular Oncology, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 920–932, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. V. Hofman, M. Ilie, E. Long et al., “Detection of circulating tumor cells from lung cancer patients in the era of targeted therapy: promises, drawbacks and pitfalls,” Current Molecular Medicine, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 440–456, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. Polzer, G. Medoro, S. Pasch et al., “Molecular profiling of single circulating tumor cells with diagnostic intention,” EMBO Molecular Medicine, vol. 6, no. 11, pp. 1371–1386, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. B. Reynés, R. Díaz-Rúa, M. Cifre, P. Oliver, and A. Palou, “Peripheral blood mononuclear cells as a potential source of biomarkers to test the efficacy of weight-loss strategies,” Obesity, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 28–31, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. K. L. Bentley-Hewitt, R. K.-Y. Chen, R. E. Lill et al., “Consumption of selenium-enriched broccoli increases cytokine production in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells stimulated ex vivo, a preliminary human intervention study,” Molecular Nutrition & Food Research, vol. 58, no. 12, pp. 2350–2357, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. V. Bordignon, F. Palamara, G. Altomonte et al., “A laboratory test based on determination of cytokine profiles: a promising assay to identify exposition to contact allergens and predict the clinical outcome in occupational allergic contact dermatitis,” BMC Immunology, vol. 16, article 4, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. M. Venkataswamy, S. N. Madhusudana, S. S. Sanyal et al., “Cellular immune response following pre-exposure and postexposure rabies vaccination by intradermal and intramuscular routes,” Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 68–74, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. G. Cardenas-Mondragon, G. Vallejo-Flores, J. Delgado-Dominguez et al., “Preeclampsia is associated with lower production of vascular endothelial growth factor by peripheral blood mononuclear cells,” Archives of Medical Research, vol. 45, no. 7, pp. 561–569, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. Jenny, M. Klieber, D. Zaknun et al., “In vitro testing for anti-inflammatory properties of compounds employing peripheral blood mononuclear cells freshly isolated from healthy donors,” Inflammation Research, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 127–135, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. N. Orekhov, I. A. Sobenin, M. A. Gavrilin et al., “Macrophages in immunopathology of atherosclerosis: a target for diagnostics and therapy,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 21, no. 9, pp. 1172–1179, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. W. E. Hellings, W. Peeters, F. L. Moll, and G. Pasterkamp, “From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: the search for biomarkers of plaque destabilization,” Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 162–171, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. A. Schaar, J. E. Muller, E. Falk et al., “Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques. Report of a meeting on the vulnerable plaque, June 17 and 18, 2003, Santorini, Greece,” European Heart Journal, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1077–1082, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  25. N. V. Serbina, T. Jia, T. M. Hohl, and E. G. Pamer, “Monocyte-mediated defense against microbial pathogens,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 26, pp. 421–452, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. van Furth and Z. A. Cohn, “The origin and kinetics of mononuclear phagocytes,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 128, no. 3, pp. 415–435, 1968. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. H. Sieweke and J. E. Allen, “Beyond stem cells: self-renewal of differentiated macrophages,” Science, vol. 342, no. 6161, Article ID 1242974, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. N. P. Hurst and G. Nuki, “Evidence for defect of complement-mediated phagocytosis by monocytes from patients with rheumatoid arthritis and cutaneous vasculitis,” British Medical Journal, vol. 282, no. 6282, pp. 2081–2083, 1981. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. Meuret and G. Hoffmann, “Monocyte kinetic studies in normal and disease states,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 275–285, 1973. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. G. Meuret, J. Bammert, and G. Hoffmann, “Kinetics of human monocytopoiesis,” Blood, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 801–816, 1974. View at: Google Scholar
  31. P. R. Taylor and S. Gordon, “Monocyte heterogeneity and innate immunity,” Immunity, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 2–4, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. F. Geissmann, S. Gordon, D. A. Hume, A. M. Mowat, and G. J. Randolph, “Unravelling mononuclear phagocyte heterogeneity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 453–460, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. S. J. Jenkins and D. A. Hume, “Homeostasis in the mononuclear phagocyte system,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 35, no. 8, pp. 358–367, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Bartocci, D. S. Mastrogiannis, G. Migliorati, R. J. Stockert, A. W. Wolkoff, and E. R. Stanley, “Macrophages specifically regulate the concentration of their own growth factor in the circulation,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 84, no. 17, pp. 6179–6183, 1987. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. C. Gasson, “Molecular physiology of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor,” Blood, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1131–1145, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  36. P. J. Murray, J. E. Allen, S. K. Biswas et al., “Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines,” Immunity, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 14–20, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. S. Gordon and F. O. Martinez, “Alternative activation of macrophages: mechanism and functions,” Immunity, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 593–604, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. C. D. Mills, K. Kincaid, J. M. Alt, M. J. Heilman, and A. M. Hill, “M-1/M-2 macrophages and the Th1/Th2 paradigm,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 164, no. 12, pp. 6166–6173, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. Gordon and P. R. Taylor, “Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 953–964, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. Gratchev, K. Schledzewski, P. Guillot, and S. Goerdt, “Alternatively activated antigen-presenting cells: molecular repertoire, immune regulation, and healing,” Skin Pharmacology and Applied Skin Physiology, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 272–279, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. Gordon, “The macrophage,” BioEssays, vol. 17, no. 11, pp. 977–986, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. F. De Paoli, B. Staels, and G. Chinetti-Gbaguidi, “Macrophage phenotypes and their modulation in atherosclerosis,” Circulation Journal, vol. 78, no. 8, pp. 1775–1781, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. R. N. Hanna, I. Shaked, H. G. Hubbeling et al., “NR4A1 (Nur77) deletion polarizes macrophages toward an inflammatory phenotype and increases atherosclerosis,” Circulation Research, vol. 110, no. 3, pp. 416–427, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. M. J. Davies, “Stability and instability: two faces of coronary atherosclerosis. The Paul Dudley White lecture 1995,” Circulation, vol. 94, no. 8, pp. 2013–2020, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. H. C. Stary, A. B. Chandler, R. E. Dinsmore et al., “A definition of advanced types of atherosclerotic lesions and a histological classification of atherosclerosis. A report from the committee on vascular lesions of the council on arteriosclerosis, American Heart Association,” Circulation, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 1355–1374, 1995. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. J. Rojas, J. Salazar, M. S. Martínez et al., “Macrophage heterogeneity and plasticity: impact of macrophage biomarkers on atherosclerosis,” Scientifica, vol. 2015, Article ID 851252, 17 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. T. J. Koh and L. A. DiPietro, “Inflammation and wound healing: the role of the macrophage,” Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, article e23, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. B. D. Fleming and D. M. Mosser, “Regulatory macrophages: setting the threshold for therapy,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2498–2502, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. A. Gratchev, J. Kzhyshkowska, K. Duperrier, J. Utikal, F. W. Velten, and S. Goerdt, “The receptor for interleukin-17E is induced by Th2 cytokines in antigen-presenting cells,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 233–237, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. V. Kodelja, C. Müller, O. Politz, N. Hakij, C. E. Orfanos, and S. Goerdt, “Alternative macrophage activation-associated CC-chemokine-1, a novel structural homologue of macrophage inflammatory protein-1α with a Th2- associated expression pattern,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 1411–1418, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  51. O. Politz, A. Gratchev, P. A. G. McCourt et al., “Stabilin-1 and -2 constitute a novel family of fasciclin-like hyaluronan receptor homologues,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 362, no. 1, pp. 155–164, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. M. M. Tiemessen, A. L. Jagger, H. G. Evans, M. J. C. van Herwijnen, S. John, and L. S. Taams, “CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T cells induce alternative activation of human monocytes/macrophages,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 49, pp. 19446–19451, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. F. Martinon, K. Burns, and J. Tschopp, “The inflammasome: a molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-β,” Molecular Cell, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 417–426, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. K. J. Moore and I. Tabas, “Macrophages in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis,” Cell, vol. 145, no. 3, pp. 341–355, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. A. Sarkar, S. Mitra, S. Mehta, R. Raices, and M. D. Wewers, “Monocyte derived microvesicles deliver a cell death message via encapsulated caspase-1,” PLoS ONE, vol. 4, no. 9, Article ID e7140, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. M. A. Gavrilin, S. Mitra, S. Seshadri et al., “Pyrin critical to macrophage IL-1β response to Francisella challenge,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 182, no. 12, pp. 7982–7989, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. M. A. Gavrilin, D. H. A. Abdelaziz, M. Mostafa et al., “Activation of the pyrin inflammasome by intracellular Burkholderia cenocepacia,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 188, no. 7, pp. 3469–3477, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. F. Martinon, A. Mayor, and J. Tschopp, “The inflammasomes: guardians of the body,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 27, pp. 229–265, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. C. A. Janeway Jr. and R. Medzhitov, “Innate immune recognition,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 20, pp. 197–216, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. P. Duewell, H. Kono, K. J. Rayner et al., “NLRP3 inflammasomes are required for atherogenesis and activated by cholesterol crystals,” Nature, vol. 464, no. 7293, pp. 1357–1361, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. V. V. Valtonen, “Infection as a risk factor for infarction and atherosclerosis,” Annals of Medicine, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 539–543, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. A. Luque, M. M. Turu, N. Rovira, J. O. Juan-Babot, M. Slevin, and J. Krupinski, “Early atherosclerotic plaques show evidence of infection by Chlamydia pneumoniae,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 2423–2432, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  63. M. Charakida and D. Tousoulis, “Infections and atheromatous plaque: current therapeutic implications,” Current Pharmaceutical Design, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 1638–1650, 2013. View at: Google Scholar
  64. E. Krishnan, “Inflammation, oxidative stress and lipids: the risk triad for atherosclerosis in gout,” Rheumatology, vol. 49, no. 7, Article ID keq037, pp. 1229–1238, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. B. Razani, C. Feng, T. Coleman et al., “Autophagy links inflammasomes to atherosclerotic progression,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 534–544, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. E. F. Strasser and R. Eckstein, “Optimization of leukocyte collection and monocyte isolation for dendritic cell culture,” Transfusion Medicine Reviews, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 130–139, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. S. B. Clarkson and P. A. Ory, “CD16. Developmentally regulated IgG Fc receptors on cultured human monocytes,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 167, no. 2, pp. 408–420, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. S. Krause, A. Pohl, C. Pohl et al., “Ex vivo investigation of blood monocyte and platelet behaviour in pigs maintained on an atherogenic diet,” Experimental and Toxicologic Pathology, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 144–146, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. F. P. Bell and R. G. Gerrity, “Evidence for an altered lipid metabolic state in circulating blood monocytes under conditions of hyperlipemia in swine and its implications in arterial lipid metabolism,” Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 155–162, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. A. Gratchev, P. Guillot, N. Hakiy et al., “Alternatively activated macrophages differentially express fibronectin and its splice variants and the extracellular matrix protein βIG-H3,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 386–392, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. A. Gratchev, J. Kzhyshkowska, K. Köthe et al., “Mφ1 and Mφ2 can be re-polarized by Th2 or Th1 cytokines, respectively, and respond to exogenous danger signals,” Immunobiology, vol. 211, no. 6–8, pp. 473–486, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. D. M. Mosser and J. P. Edwards, “Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 958–969, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. S. M. Pyonteck, L. Akkari, A. J. Schuhmacher et al., “CSF-1R inhibition alters macrophage polarization and blocks glioma progression,” Nature Medicine, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 1264–1272, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. E. R. Andreeva, I. M. Pugach, and A. N. Orekhov, “Subendothelial smooth muscle cells of human aorta express macrophage antigen in situ and in vitro,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 135, no. 1, pp. 19–27, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. E. R. Andreeva, I. M. Pugach, and A. N. Orekhov, “Collagen-synthesizing cells in initial and advanced atherosclerotic lesions of human aorta,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 130, no. 1-2, pp. 133–142, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. E. J. Mills, B. Rachlis, P. Wu, P. J. Devereaux, P. Arora, and D. Perri, “Primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality and events with statin treatments: a network meta-analysis involving more than 65,000 patients,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 22, pp. 1769–1781, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. S. Hirayama and T. Miida, “Small dense LDL: an emerging risk factor for cardiovascular disease,” Clinica Chimica Acta, vol. 414, pp. 215–224, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. D. Steinberg, S. Parthasarathy, T. E. Carew, J. C. Khoo, and J. L. Witztum, “Beyond cholesterol. Modifications of low-density lipoprotein that increase its atherogenicity,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 320, no. 14, pp. 915–924, 1989. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. A. N. Orekhov, V. V. Tertov, and D. N. Mukhin, “Desialylated low density lipoprotein—naturally occurring modified lipoprotein with atherogenic potency,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 86, no. 2-3, pp. 153–161, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. A. N. Orekhov, V. V. Tertov, A. E. Kabakov, I. Y. Adamova, S. N. Pokrovsky, and V. N. Smirnov, “Autoantibodies against modified low density lipoprotein. Nonlipid factor of blood plasma that stimulates foam cell formation,” Arteriosclerosis and Thrombosis, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 316–326, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. E. I. Chazov, A. N. Orekhov, N. V. Perova et al., “Atherogenicity of blood serum from patients with coronary heart disease,” The Lancet, vol. 328, no. 8507, pp. 595–598, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. A. N. Orekhov, V. V. Tertov, K. A. Khashimov, S. S. Kudryashov, and V. N. Smirnov, “Evidence of antiatherosclerotic action of verapamil from direct effects on arterial cells,” The American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 495–496, 1987. View at: Google Scholar
  83. S. E. Akopov, A. N. Orekhov, V. V. Tertov, K. A. Khashimov, E. S. Gabrielyan, and V. N. Smirnov, “Stable analogues of prostacyclin and thromboxane A2 display contradictory influences on atherosclerotic properties of cells cultured from human aorta The effect of calcium antagonists,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 72, no. 2-3, pp. 245–248, 1988. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. A. N. Orekhov, V. V. Tertov, S. A. Kudryashov, K. A. Khashimov, and V. N. Smirnov, “Primary culture of human aortic intima cells as a model for testing antiatherosclerotic drugs. Effects of cyclic AMP, prostaglandins, calcium antagonists, antioxidants, and lipid-lowering agents,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 101–110, 1986. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2016 Ekaterina A. Ivanova and Alexander N. Orekhov. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.