Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2019 / Article
Special Issue

Natural Immunomodulators 2018

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 2198508 | 9 pages |

CD80 Expression Correlates with IL-6 Production in THP-1-Like Macrophages Costimulated with LPS and Dialyzable Leukocyte Extract (Transferon®)

Academic Editor: Daniel Ortuño-Sahagún
Received13 Nov 2018
Revised01 Feb 2019
Accepted12 Feb 2019
Published10 Apr 2019


Transferon® is a complex drug based on a mixture of low molecular weight peptides. This biotherapeutic is employed as a coadjuvant in clinical trials of several diseases, including viral infections and allergies. Given that macrophages play key roles in pathogen recognition, phagocytosis, processing, and antigen presentation, we evaluated the effect of Transferon® on phenotype and function of macrophage-like cells derived from THP-1 monocytes. We determined the surface expression of CD80 and CD86 by flow cytometry and IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 levels by ELISA. Transferon® alone did not alter the steady state of PMA-differentiated macrophage-like THP-1 cells. On the contrary, simultaneous stimulation of cells with Transferon® and LPS elicited a significant increase in CD80 () and CD86 () expression, as well as in IL-6 production () compared to the LPS control. CD80 expression and IL-6 production exhibited a positive correlation (, ) in cells exposed to Transferon® and LPS. Our results suggest that the administration of Transferon® induces the expression of costimulatory molecules and the secretion of cytokines in LPS-activated macrophages. Further studies are necessary to determine the implication of these findings in the therapeutic properties of Transferon®.

1. Introduction

Transferon® is a human dialyzable leucocyte extract (DLE), and its active pharmaceutical ingredient is a complex mixture of low molecular weight peptides with immunomodulatory properties. This complex biological drug has been used in several clinical trials in immune-related diseases like herpes simplex infection, atopic dermatitis, asthma, and allergy [17]. At the cellular level, DLEs activate TLR signaling in monocytes [8], NF-κB and cAMP in endothelial cells, and modify cytokine production in candida and herpes infection [3, 9]. Another dialyzable leukocyte extracts, such as bovine source (bDLEs), decrease nitric oxide and TNF-α production in LPS-stimulated murine peritoneal macrophages [10] and induce macrophage differentiation to M2 alternative profile [11]. Despite this evidence and by its complex composition, DLE could have diverse effects at the cellular level.

The mononuclear phagocytic system, which involves the differentiation of hematopoietic cells into blood monocytes and tissue macrophages, is an essential part of the innate immune system [12] since it performs several key functions, including phagocytosis, production of cell-activating cytokines, tissue remodeling, antigen presenting through MHC-II, and expression of costimulatory molecules. Altogether, these functions favor an appropriate adaptive immune response [13]. For example, during infections, macrophages can be activated by pathogen components, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) from Gram-negative bacteria, which is recognized by Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) [14]. In consequence, macrophages enhance their cytokine production and antigen-presenting cell (APC) capabilities [15].

Macrophages internalize and process antigens to present them to lymphocyte T-cell through MHC-II molecules [16]; however, other costimulatory signals are required to induce a full T-cell activation. CD80 and CD86 are the main costimulatory molecules expressed on the APC surface. CD80 and CD86 bind to CD28 or CD152 to promote or restrict T-cell activation depending on time and signal strength [17]. Once T-cells are activated, certain cytokines will define their polarization profile.

IL-6 is a cytokine involved in several immune functions; it could be produced by APC to promote polarization to the anti-inflammatory Th2 profile [18, 19] and induce a Th17 profile during priming of T-cells [20]. Furthermore, IL-6 also influences the acquisition of an M2 phenotype in macrophages [21].

The human monocytic cell line THP-1 has been extensively used for an in vitro study of the mononuclear phagocytic system. THP-1 cells can be easily differentiated into macrophage-like cells with increased adherence, loss of proliferative activity, and CD14+/CD11b+ phenotype [22]. In this work, we aimed to evaluate the effect of leukocyte dialyzable extract, Transferon®, on CD80 and CD86 surface expression as well as their relationship with IL-6 production in immunomodulatory macrophage-like THP1 cells.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. THP-1 Culture and Differentiation

THP-1 monocytes were obtained from ATCC® (Manassas, VA, USA). Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (ATCC®) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (GIBCO®, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) and 0.05 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Sigma®, St. Louis Missouri, USA) during 5 days in a humidified incubator at 37°C with 5% of CO2. THP-1 monocytes were differentiated to macrophage-like cells as previously reported [23]. Briefly, cells were exposed to 50 ng/mL phorbol myristate acetate (PMA) (Sigma®) during 24 h and then incubated for additional 24 h in the absence of PMA before further treatment. Macrophage-like THP1 cells were harvested by washing them with cold PBS (Gibco®) with 1% FBS and then exposed to cold 25 mM EDTA (Invitrogen®, AM9260G) for 10 min in ice. Cells were gently removed, suspended, and washed with RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% FBS. Cells were counted, and the viability was assessed using trypan blue (Sigma®, T8154-100ML). In all experiments, we used microscopy to confirm that PMA treatment induced the expected morphological changes; we also evaluated CD14 and CD11 expression by flow cytometry using anti-CD14 (BD Biosciences, La Jolla, CA, USA) and anti-CD11b (BioLegend®, San Diego, CA, USA) antibodies.

2.2. Transferon® Samples

Three different batches of Transferon® were employed in this work: 16F18, 16G22, and 16H23. Transferon® batches were manufactured and provided by Pharma-FT at ENCB-IPN facilities (Mexico City, Mexico).

2.3. Treatments

PMA-differentiated THP-1 cells were treated with Transferon® (0.1, 1.0, or 10.0 μg/mL) in the presence or absence of LPS (Sigma®). The employed concentrations of LPS were 0.1 and 1.0 μg/mL.

2.4. CD14, CD11b, CD80, and CD86 Detection by Flow Cytometry

CD14 and CD11b expressions were evaluated using anti-CD14-Pacific Blue (BD Biosciences®, clone M4E2), and anti-CD11b (BioLegend®, clone M1/70) antibodies were used to confirm the PMA-induced differentiation of THP-1 to macrophage-like cells. Macrophage activation markers were analyzed using αCD80-PE (BD Biosciences®, clone L307.4), αCD86-APC (BD Biosciences®, clone 2331), or αHLA-DR-PE antibodies (BD Biosciences®, cloneG46-6). In all cases, cells were incubated with 100 μL of blockade buffer (BD Biosciences®) during 20 min and washed with stain buffer. Subsequently, cells were stained with the corresponding antibodies during 30 min on ice. Finally, cells were washed twice with stain buffer and acquired in a BD FACSAria III cytometer (BD Biosciences®). Data were analyzed using FlowJo® software version 7.6.2. (La Jolla, CA).

2.5. Cytokine Detection by Flow Cytometry

Cells were incubated with Brefeldin A (Sigma®) for intracellular detection of IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6. After treatment, cells were washed with 100 μL of Perm/Wash® buffer (BioLegend®) and incubated with 200 μL of Cytofix/Cytoperm™ buffer (BD Biosciences®, 555028) in a light-protected ice bath. After 20 min, cells were washed with stain buffer and the respective antibody was added: anti-TNF-PerCP/Cy5.5 (BioLegend®, clone Mab11), anti-IL-1β-Pacific Blue (BioLegend®, clone H1b-98), or anti-IL-6-PE (BioLegend®, clone MQ2-13A5). Then, cells were washed again, suspended in stain buffer, and acquired on a BD FACSAria III cytometer. Data were analyzed using FlowJo software version 7.6.2.

2.6. Cytokine Quantitation

IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6 were quantified in supernatants of macrophage-like THP-1 cells treated with LPS and/or Transferon® during 24 and 48 h. IL-1β was analyzed using ELISA kit OptEIA Human IL-1β (BD Biosciences, 557953). TNF-α and IL-6 were analyzed using a human Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) (BD Biosciences®, 560484). Both assays were performed according to the instructions of the manufacturer.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical differences among treatments were determined as follows: the D’Agostino-Pearson omnibus normality test was performed to determine the normal distribution in our study groups, and then a one-way ANOVA followed by a Dunn’s multiple-comparison test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 6.00 for Windows, (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA; A -test was applied to distinguish macrophage-like THP-1 cells from undifferentiated cells. A Pearson correlation was executed to determine the association between IL-6 production and CD80 expression. In all cases, deviation (SD) is reported. The statistical significance is described using these signs: , , and .

3. Results

3.1. Transferon® Alone Did Not Induce Activation in Macrophage-Like THP1 Cells

PMA treatment induced a macrophage-like phenotype in THP-1 cells. After PMA stimulation, the cells showed a typical spreading (Figures 1(a) and 1(b)). Further characterization by flow cytometry confirmed that differentiated cells increased size and granularity (Figures 1(c) and 1(d)) and showed higher levels of CD11b and CD14 on their membrane (Figure 1(e)). The expression levels of both receptors showed significant differences between THP-1 cells before and after differentiation (CD11b: and CD14: ). Only differentiated cells were employed in the subsequent experimental procedures.

We stimulated THP-1-like macrophages with different concentrations of Transferon® without LPS. In these assays, we did not observe morphological changes nor alterations of the production of IL-1β, TNF-α, or IL-6 in macrophage-like THP1 cells (Figure 2). This result agrees with the null immunogenicity previously reported for Transferon® [24]. In contrast, stimulation with LPS (1 μg/mL) significantly increased the fraction of positive cells, as expected [25]; treatment with LPS was used as positive control in these experiments.

3.2. Transferon® Upregulated IL-6 Production in the Presence of LPS

In the second set of experiments, we tested whether Transferon® could modulate LPS-induced cytokine production. Interestingly, in the simultaneous treatment of macrophage-like THP-1 cells with Transferon® and LPS, IL-6 production was upregulated at high concentrations of Transferon®, which was statistically different when compared with LPS control (, , 32; ) (Figure 3(a)) but it did not affect IL-1β and TNF-α production (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)).

3.3. Transferon® Increased LPS-Induced CD80/CD86 Cell-Surface Expression

Macrophage-like THP1 cells were treated with LPS (1 μg/mL) and different concentrations of Transferon® (0.1, 1, and 10 μg/mL) to evaluate the effect of Transferon® on cell surface expression of costimulatory molecules. We observed that CD86 was upregulated in cells simultaneously treated with LPS and Transferon® (1 and 10 μg/mL) in comparison with cells treated with LPS alone (, , 32; for LPS vs. LPS+Transferon® 1 μg/mL and for LPS vs. LPS+Transferon® 10 μg/mL), as shown in Figure 4(a). A similar effect was determined for CD80 expression in all Transferon® concentrations used when compared to LPS control (, , 32; Transferon® 0.1 μg/mL , Transferon® 1 μg/mL and Transferon® 10 μg/mL ), as shown in Figure 4(b); also, we evaluated HLA-DR surface expression; however, no changes in each condition were observed (see Supplementary Materials (available here)). These results demonstrated that Transferon® has a costimulatory effect on macrophage-like THP1 cells, which could impact on immune response mediated by macrophages.

3.4. CD80 Expression and IL-6 Production Showed a Positive Correlation in Cells Costimulated with LPS Plus Transferon®

An association between CD80 and CD86 expression with IL-6 production in dendritic cells has been recently reported [26]. For this reason, we determined the association between the increment of IL-6 production and changes in CD80/CD86 surface expression in cells treated with Transferon® (10 μg/mL) plus LPS. A Pearson correlation test found a positive correlation between CD80 expression and IL-6 production (, ; Figure 5(a)). However, no correlation for CD86 expression and IL-6 production was observed (Figure 5(b)).

4. Discussion

Contradictory effects of DLE have been reported using in vitro assays. Our results agree with those reported by Ojeda et al. using a DLE extract made in Cuba [27]. In both reports, DLE increases IL-6 production in HUVECs and primary cultured human monocytes in a similar way to our THP-1 macrophage model, despite using different DLE concentrations and cellular models. In contrast, Franco-Molina et al. reported that a bovine DLE decreases IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β expression [28]; these differences could be attributed to the biological source of DLE, type of sample, and experimental conditions. THP-1 is a human leukemia-derived monocytic cell line that resembles monocytes and macrophages after PMA activation. Accordingly, it has been widely used for in vitro studies [2931]. THP-1 cells can be differentiated to macrophages using PMA. The resulting cells have phenotypic and functional characteristics that resemble those of primary human macrophages [32], including CD11b and CD14 expression. CD11b is an important integrin for the linkage to the extracellular matrix [33], while CD14 functions as coreceptor of TLR4 for LPS recognition [34].

In addition to their key functions in innate response, macrophages play a relevant role in adaptive immune response acting as APCs that load peptides into the MHC-II molecule, allowing interaction with specific T-cell receptors (TCRs). However, T-cell activation requires that the costimulatory receptors CD80 and CD86 bind to CD28 or CD152 on a T-cell surface to complete immunological synapse [35]. The costimulatory receptors drive the activation of T-cell by ligation with CD28 or restrict T-cell proliferation by CD152 ligation [36]. In addition, those interactions cooperate with local cytokine production to define the Th profile. For example, it is well known that IL-2 drives Th1 profile, while IL-4 drives anti-inflammatory Th2 profile [37].

Recently, it has been reported that IL-6 also drives to Th2 profile [18, 38]. IL-6 is a pleiotropic cytokine involved in both pro- and anti-inflammatory processes [39]. As an immunomodulatory cytokine, IL-6 has been related to tissue remodeling and macrophage polarization to M2 profile [40, 41].

Here, we found a positive correlation between IL-6 production and CD80 expression in LPS-activated THP-1-like macrophages in costimulation with Transferon®. Recently, it has been reported that ligation of CD80/CD86 in dendritic cells induces Notch signaling activation and IL-6 production to enhance T-cell response [26]. The binding site of CD80 comprises residues 87-94, which interacts with residues 110 to 120 of CD28 [42]. Since our experimental system did not include T-cells, we hypothesize that some of the low molecular weight peptides present in Transferon® may have a direct binding to CD80, eliciting an enhancement in IL-6 production. IL-6 stimulation could, in turn, induce a positive feedback that increases the expression of CD80 and CD86, as previously reported for dendritic cells [43]. However, further studies are required to determine (i) whether the CD80-activated Notch signaling is active in macrophage-like cells costimulated with Transferon®, (ii) what is the role of such pathway in the increment of IL-6 production, and (iii) what are the functional consequences of this phenomenon.

5. Conclusion

Transferon® has been used as an immunomodulatory drug in clinical trials of diseases with an inflammatory component. Due to its complex composition, it is possible that its therapeutic effects are elicited by several different mechanisms in the immune system. Thus, it is important to evaluate the response of different cell lineages to this immunomodulator. Our results showed that Transferon® is able to increase the expression of costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 in THP-1 macrophage-like cells. We also identified a new possible mechanism of action that involves CD80 and the production of IL-6.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

APJ-U, GC-U, EM-R, RC-S, GM-S, and SMP-T are involved in the research and development of Transferon®. SMP-T is the CEO of UDIBI. The rest of the authors declare no competing interests. Funding sources had no impact on the study design; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; the writing of the manuscript; nor the decision to submit it for publication.

Authors’ Contributions

Alexis P. Jiménez-Uribe and Hugo Valencia-Martínez contributed equally to this work.


This work was supported by the “Unidad de Desarrollo e Investigación en Bioprocesos (UDIBI)” de la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas (ENCB) del Instituto Politécnico Nacional (IPN) (Project FTU/DF/16/001/PRO) and the “Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría” (Project INPRF: NC092318.0 and NC092318.1). This work was entirely carried out with the equipment of “Laboratorios Nacional para Servicios Especializados de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación (I+D+I) para Farmoquímicos y Biotecnológicos,” LANSEIDI-FarBiotec-CONACyT, which is part of UDIBI-IPN. HV-M and LV-C were recipients of a scholarship from CONACyT during the development of this work (scholarship number 667203 and 407865, respectively).

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1: Transferon® did not modify HLA-DR expression. Macrophage-like THP1 cells were treated with 0.1 μg/mL, 1 μg/mL, and 10 μg/mL of Transferon® with or without LPS. After 24 hours of exposure, the cells were stained with an anti-HLA-DR. (Supplementary Materials)


  1. R. Berrón-Pérez, R. Chávez-Sánchez, I. Estrada-García et al., “Indications, usage, and dosage of the transfer factor,” Revista Alergia México, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 134–139, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  2. A. Bravo-Blas, R. Téllez, S. Uribe et al., “El factor de transferencia como inductor de la expresión de RNAm de IFN-γ e IL-2 en pollos vacunados contra influenza aviar,” Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 67–71, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. F. Robledo-Ávila, M. Pérez-Tapia, A. Limón-Flores et al., “Low-dose amphotericin B and murine dialyzable spleen extracts protect against systemic Candida infection in mice,” Clinical and Developmental Immunology, vol. 2013, Article ID 194064, 7 pages, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. N. Salinas-Jazmín, S. Estrada-Parra, M. A. Becerril-García et al., “Herpes murine model as a biological assay to test dialyzable leukocyte extracts activity,” Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2015, Article ID 146305, 9 pages, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. J. Gómez Vera, R. Chávez Sánchez, G. Flores Sandoval et al., “Transfer factor and allergy,” Revista Alergia México, vol. 57, no. 6, pp. 208–214, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S. E. Espinosa Padilla, S. Orozco, A. Plaza et al., “Effect of transfer factor on treatment with glucocorticoids in a group of pediatric patients with persistent moderate allergic asthma,” Revista Alergia México, vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 67–71, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  7. S. Estrada-Parra, A. Nagaya, E. Serrano et al., “Comparative study of transfer factor and acyclovir in the treatment of herpes zoster,” International Journal of Immunopharmacology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 521–535, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. U. García-Hernández, F. H. Robledo-Avila, V. D. Alvarez-Jiménez et al., “Dialyzable leukocyte extracts activate TLR-2 on monocytes,” Natural Product Communications, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 853–856, 2014. View at: Google Scholar
  9. J. Byston, K. Cech, J. Pekarek, and J. Jilkova, “Effect of anti-herpes specific transfer factor,” Biotherapy, vol. 9, no. 1-3, pp. 73–75, 1996. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. M. A. Franco-Molina, E. Mendoza-Gamboa, L. Castillo-León, R. S. Tamez-Guerra, and C. Rodríguez-Padilla, “Bovine dialyzable leukocyte extract modulates the nitric oxide and pro-inflammatory cytokine production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated murine peritoneal macrophages in vitro,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 20–26, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. C. A. Sierra-Rivera, M. A. Franco-Molina, E. Mendoza-Gamboa et al., “Effect of bovine dialyzable leukocyte extract on induction of cell differentiation and death in K562 human chronic myelogenous leukemia cells,” Oncology Letters, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 4449–4460, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. D. A. Hume, “The mononuclear phagocyte system,” Current Opinion in Immunology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 49–53, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. S. Gordon and P. R. Taylor, “Monocyte and macrophage heterogeneity,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 953–964, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. Y. C. Lu, W. C. Yeh, and P. S. Ohashi, “LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway,” Cytokine, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 145–151, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. M. Haniffa, V. Bigley, and M. Collin, “Human mononuclear phagocyte system reunited,” Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, vol. 41, pp. 59–69, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. C. V. Jakubzick, G. J. Randolph, and P. M. Henson, “Monocyte differentiation and antigen-presenting functions,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 349–362, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. M. Thiel, M. J. Wolfs, S. Bauer et al., “Efficiency of T-cell costimulation by CD80 and CD86 cross-linking correlates with calcium entry,” Immunology, vol. 129, no. 1, pp. 28–40, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. S. Diehl and M. Rincon, “The two faces of IL-6 on Th1/Th2 differentiation,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 531–536, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. E. Allen and T. A. Wynn, “Evolution of Th2 immunity: a rapid repair response to tissue destructive pathogens,” PLoS Pathogens, vol. 7, no. 5, article e1002003, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. Heink, N. Yogev, C. Garbers et al., “Trans-presentation of IL-6 by dendritic cells is required for the priming of pathogenic TH17 cells,” Nature Immunology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 74–85, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. J. Mauer, B. Chaurasia, J. Goldau et al., “Signaling by IL-6 promotes alternative activation of macrophages to limit endotoxemia and obesity-associated resistance to insulin,” Nature Immunology, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 423–430, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. E. Richter, K. Ventz, M. Harms, J. Mostertz, and F. Hochgräfe, “Induction of macrophage function in human THP-1 cells is associated with rewiring of MAPK signaling and activation of MAP3K7 (TAK1) protein kinase,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, vol. 4, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. T. Starr, T. J. Bauler, P. Malik-Kale, and O. Steele-Mortimer, “The phorbol 12-myristate-13-acetate differentiation protocol is critical to the interaction of THP-1 macrophages with Salmonella typhimurium,” PLoS One, vol. 13, no. 3, article e0193601, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. S. Avila, L. Muñoz-García, S. Vázquez-Leyva et al., “Transferon™, a peptide mixture with immunomodulatory properties is not immunogenic when administered with various adjuvants,” Journal of Immunotoxicology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 169–177, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. D. Leyva-Illades, R. P. Cherla, C. L. Galindo, A. K. Chopra, and V. L. Tesh, “Global transcriptional response of macrophage-like THP-1 cells to Shiga toxin type 1,” Infection and Immunity, vol. 78, no. 6, pp. 2454–2465, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. C. Koorella, J. R. Nair, M. E. Murray, L. M. Carlson, S. K. Watkins, and K. P. Lee, “Novel regulation of CD80/CD86-induced phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling by NOTCH1 protein in interleukin-6 and indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase production by dendritic cells,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 289, no. 11, pp. 7747–7762, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. M. O. Ojeda, C. van't Veer, C. B. Fernández Ortega, M. J. Araña Rosainz, and W. A. Buurman, “Dialyzable leukocyte extract differentially regulates the production of TNFα, IL-6, and IL-8 in bacterial component-activated leukocytes and endothelial cells,” Inflammation Research, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 74–81, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. A. Franco-Molina, E. Mendoza-Gamboa, P. Castillo-Tello et al., “Bovine dialyzable leukocyte extract modulates cytokines and nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human blood cells,” Cytotherapy, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 379–385, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M. Y. Abdalla, I. M. Ahmad, B. Switzer, and B. E. Britigan, “Induction of heme oxygenase-1 contributes to survival of Mycobacterium abscessus in human macrophages-like THP-1 cells,” Redox Biology, vol. 4, pp. 328–339, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. Y. C. Wang, Y. W. Hu, Y. H. Sha et al., “Ox-LDL upregulates IL-6 expression by enhancing NF-κB in an IGF2-dependent manner in THP-1 macrophages,” Inflammation, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 2116–2123, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. L. Bernal, A. Alvarado-Vázquez, D. W. Ferreira et al., “Evaluation of a nanotechnology-based approach to induce gene-expression in human THP-1 macrophages under inflammatory conditions,” Immunobiology, vol. 222, no. 2, pp. 399–408, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. E. Lund, J. To, B. A. O'Brien, and S. Donnelly, “The choice of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate differentiation protocol influences the response of THP-1 macrophages to a pro-inflammatory stimulus,” Journal of Immunological Methods, vol. 430, pp. 64–70, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. D. A. Solovjov, E. Pluskota, and E. F. Plow, “Distinct roles for the α and β subunits in the functions of integrin αMβ2,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 2, pp. 1336–1345, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. J. K. Ryu, S. J. Kim, S. H. Rah et al., “Reconstruction of LPS transfer cascade reveals structural determinants within LBP, CD14, and TLR4-MD2 for efficient LPS recognition and transfer,” Immunity, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 38–50, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. N. Porciello and L. Tuosto, “CD28 costimulatory signals in T lymphocyte activation: emerging functions beyond a qualitative and quantitative support to TCR signalling,” Cytokine & Growth Factor Reviews, vol. 28, pp. 11–19, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. C. Vasu, A. Wang, S. R. Gorla, S. Kaithamana, B. S. Prabhakar, and M. J. Holterman, “CD80 and CD86 C domains play an important role in receptor binding and co‐stimulatory properties,” International Immunology, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 167–175, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. I. Raphael, S. Nalawade, T. N. Eagar, and T. G. Forsthuber, “T cell subsets and their signature cytokines in autoimmune and inflammatory diseases,” Cytokine, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 5–17, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. O. Dienz and M. Rincon, “The effects of IL-6 on CD4 T cell responses,” Clinical Immunology, vol. 130, no. 1, pp. 27–33, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Scheller, A. Chalaris, D. Schmidt-Arras, and S. Rose-John, “The pro- and anti-inflammatory properties of the cytokine interleukin-6,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, vol. 1813, no. 5, pp. 878–888, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. L. M. Sanmarco, N. E. Ponce, L. M. Visconti et al., “IL-6 promotes M2 macrophage polarization by modulating purinergic signaling and regulates the lethal release of nitric oxide during Trypanosoma cruzi infection,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Molecular Basis of Disease, vol. 1863, no. 4, pp. 857–869, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. X. L. Fu, W. Duan, C. Y. Su et al., “Interleukin 6 induces M2 macrophage differentiation by STAT3 activation that correlates with gastric cancer progression,” Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, vol. 66, no. 12, pp. 1597–1608, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. P. Sorensen, M. Kussmann, A. Rosén et al., “Identification of protein-protein interfaces implicated in CD80-CD28 costimulatory signaling,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 172, no. 11, pp. 6803–6809, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. J. Park, T. Nakagawa, H. Kitamura et al., “IL-6 regulates in vivo dendritic cell differentiation through STAT3 activation,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 173, no. 6, pp. 3844–3854, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Alexis P. Jiménez-Uribe et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

2201 Views | 595 Downloads | 2 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.