Journal of Immunology Research

Journal of Immunology Research / 2019 / Article
Special Issue

Recent Advances in the Immunopathogenesis and Immunotherapy of Autoimmune Diseases

View this Special Issue

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 |Article ID 4735040 |

Li Wang, Limeng Zhu, Song Qin, "Gut Microbiota Modulation on Intestinal Mucosal Adaptive Immunity", Journal of Immunology Research, vol. 2019, Article ID 4735040, 10 pages, 2019.

Gut Microbiota Modulation on Intestinal Mucosal Adaptive Immunity

Academic Editor: Minggang Zhang
Received31 May 2019
Accepted05 Aug 2019
Published03 Oct 2019


The mammalian intestine harbors a remarkable number of microbes and their components and metabolites, which are fundamental for the instigation and development of the host immune system. The intestinal innate and adaptive immunity coordinate and interact with the symbionts contributing to the intestinal homeostasis through establishment of a mutually beneficial relationship by tolerating to symbiotic microbiota and retaining the ability to exert proinflammatory response towards invasive pathogens. Imbalance between the intestinal immune system and commensal organisms disrupts the intestinal microbiological homeostasis, leading to microbiota dysbiosis, compromised integrity of the intestinal barrier, and proinflammatory immune responses towards symbionts. This, in turn, exacerbates the degree of the imbalance. Intestinal adaptive immunity plays a critical role in maintaining immune tolerance towards symbionts and the integrity of intestinal barrier, while the innate immune system regulates the adaptive immune responses to intestinal commensal bacteria. In this review, we will summarize recent findings on the effects and mechanisms of gut microbiota on intestinal adaptive immunity and the plasticity of several immune cells under diverse microenvironmental settings.

1. Introduction

The mammalian intestine harbors a vast microbiota, fundamental for the development and maintenance of the host immune system serving as an important epigenetic system [1]. A range of microbiota derivatives and metabolites can modulate host intestinal immune functions by influencing various cell types, including intestinal epithelial cells (IECs), mononuclear phagocytes, innate lymphoid cells (ILCs), and B and T lymphocytes [2]. The intestinal homeostasis requires a dexterously regulated network of the immune cells and their interplay with symbionts. The intestinal innate and adaptive immunities initiated by commensal microbiota coordinate protection of the host from invasion by foreign pathogens and intestine homeostasis [3, 4]. The intestinal adaptive immunity induced by intestinal resident microbiota, associated with differentiation of CD4+ T cells and IgA-producing B cells in Peyer’s patches (PPs) and lamina propria (LP), and intestinal epithelial lymphocytes (IELs) play a critical role in maintaining immune tolerance towards symbiotic bacteria, integrity of intestine barrier, and gut homeostasis [5]. A critical time window shortly after birth is regarded as vital for the development of gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) in addition to differentiation and maturation of T cells and B cells. This phenomenon is of high consequence as the sequence and composition of colonized intestinal microbiota in infants influence the vaccine efficacy [6].

Microbiota dysbiosis increases host susceptibility to various immune, inflammatory, and allergy disorders of intestine and remote organs [7, 8]. It is shown that restoration of microbiota dysbiosis induced by antibiotics or other factors through administration of probiotics or fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) of intestinal commensal bacterial species, such as Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus johnsonii, restores the suppressed adaptive immune functions in human and mice [911]. The microbiota and their derived small-molecule metabolites regulate immune cells through direct and indirect effects at the cellular and molecular level. For example, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs)—a gut microbiota metabolite—influence the fate of immune cells through direct epigenetic modification-induced alteration of metabolism via inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) [1214].

The fact that intestinal microbiota is a key orchestrator in cancer immunotherapy has recently gained acceptance [15, 16]. Intestinal dysbiosis contributes to primary resistance towards immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) [17]. Studies have revealed that certain species exhibit evident effects on antitumor efficacy of ICIs via promoting dendritic cell (DC) and CD8+ T cell functions and inhibiting regulatory T cells (Tregs) [18, 19]. For instance, melanoma does not respond to cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) blockade in antibiotic-treated or germ-free mice (GF), and this defect is rescued by administration of Bacteroides fragilis, B. fragilis polysaccharides, or B. fragilis-specific T cells [20].

The precise effect mechanisms underlying the effect of defined intestinal microbiota and metabolites on specific immune cell function still need to be elucidated. This review is aimed at highlighting the results of recent studies on the effects and mechanisms of intestinal microbiota and derived metabolites and signals on the development as well as differentiation of intestinal adaptive immune cells. This review also pays special emphasis on the induction of intestinal immune tolerance that is also associated with the intestinal innate immunity.

2. Composition of the Intestinal Adaptive Immunity

The intestinal mucosal immune system involves GALT that mainly includes aggregated lymphoid follicles, such as the PP, effector lymphocytes in LP, intraepithelial lymphocytes (IELs), and a series of molecules. The intestinal homeostasis requires a delicate balance between the effector T cells and the regulatory T cells, which mediate immune response to pathogens and confine excessive immune activation. Secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) that binds to commensal and invading microbes contributes to the homeostasis of intestinal mucosal immunity and barrier function [21]. In addition, intestinal innate immunity plays an important role in contributing immune tolerant features of adaptive immunity. Recent research has demonstrated that group 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3s) regulate interactions between T follicular helper (Tfh) cells and B cells, in a steady state, to limit mucosal IgA responses [22, 23]. Furthermore, and under physiological conditions, the IECs promote generation of T cell responses against the resident microbiota through endocytosis of antigens from commensal bacteria, such as proteins from segmented filamentous bacteria (SFB) [23].

3. Gut Microbiota and CD4+ T Cell Differentiation

CD4+ T cells are mainly located in the intestinal LP, most of which are effector or memory T cells. CD4+ T cell responses vary greatly depending on the niche of colonization, antigen type, and metabolic property of gut microbiota, which results in the generation of distinct T cell subsets and the functional plasticity of certain T cell subsets [24]. Upon activation by microbiota, antigens are presented by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) such as dendritic cells (DCs), and CD4+ T cells differentiate into Tregs and various T helper (Th1) cells such as IFN-γ, IL-4, B cell regulating, and IL-17 producing Th1, Th2, Tfh, and Th17 cells, respectively [25, 26]. Th17 cells and Treg cells are the extensively studied subsets of T cells constituting a large proportion of the effector cells. The imbalance between the cells of these two subsets results in various disorders ranging from inflammatory and autoimmune diseases to infection and cancer [27]. A recent study indicates that the transfer of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) microbiota into GF mice increases the number of intestinal Th17 cells and Th2 cells and decreases retinoic acid-related orphan receptor γt (RORγt)+ Treg cells as compared with transferred microbiota from healthy donors. Gut microbiota-derived SCFAs have been demonstrated to regulate T cell differentiation in a concentration and immunological milieu-dependent manner. For instance, Kespohl et al. have reported that although a lower butyrate concentration can facilitate Treg differentiation under steady-state conditions in vitro and in vivo, higher concentrations of butyrate induce the expression of the transcription factor T-bet in all the investigated T cell subsets resulting in the differentiation of IFN-γ-producing Tregs or conventional T cells [28]. In contrast, Chen et al. have shown that butyrate controls the T cell capacity in the induction of colitis through differential regulation of Th1 and Th17 cell differentiation and promotion of IL-10 production [14].

Proportions of Th17 and RORγt+ Treg cells induced by different microbiota are predictive of human disease status and contribute to disease severity in the Rag1-/- colitis model suggesting a general mechanism that enlightens the contributions of microbiota in IBD pathogenesis [29]. Han et al. have demonstrated that in patients of acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), the microbiota was depleted of Clostridia (e.g., the Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae families) and enriched for Gammaproteobacteria (e.g., the Enterobacteriaceae family) as compared with the non-aGVHD group. Moreover, the Treg/Th17 ratio positively correlates with the relative abundance of intestinal Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae. Furthermore, the Treg/Th17 ratio and Lachnospiraceae/Ruminococcaceae ratio are correlated with the level of acetylated H3 in CD4+ T cells [30]. Though functions of Treg and Th17 are prominently diverse, they share several important features during differentiation and function [31, 32].

3.1. Effects of Gut Microbiota and Metabolites on Th17 Cell Plasticity

Th17 cells are critical in the defense against pathogens, especially in the case of extracellular bacterial and fungal infections. In response to SFB colonization, naïve CD4+ T cells can migrate to LP of the small intestinal and differentiate into IL-17A producing Th17 cells. IL-17A, IL-17F, and IL-22 produced by Th17, in turn, stimulate IECs to produce antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) [33] and maintain integrity of the intestinal barrier in a noninflammatory manner [34]. In addition, Th17 cells are crucial for the production of T cell-dependent (TD) high-affinity bacteria-specific IgA [35]. Excessive activation of Th17 cells can result in autoimmune diseases [36]. Microbiota, especially SFB, influences the differentiation of Th17 cells [37]. Transcription factor RORγt is essential in the differentiation of IL-17 producing CD4+ Th17 and Th1/17 cells that coproduce IL-17 and IFN-γ. It has been demonstrated that T cell antigen receptors (TCR) specific for SFB-encoded peptides promote CD4+ T cell differentiation into RORγt-expressing Th17 cells, even if the SFB-colonized mice also harbors in their intestine Listeria monocytogenes—a strong Th1 cell inducer [38]. Nevertheless, a recently published data shows that the SFB responding T cells comprise of a heterogeneous population including Th1, Th17, and Tfh cells proven by single cell RT-PCR analysis [39].

The dichotomous nature of Th17 cells also enables them to be pathogenic drivers, especially in IBD [40]. Intestinal Th1 and Th17 cells also play an indispensable role in microbiota-promoted colorectal cancer development. A study has revealed that proportions of Th1 and Th17 cells and cytokines, IL-17A, IL-22, and IL-23A, produced by Th17 cells are higher in conventional mice than in GF mice when fed with stool from patients with colorectal cancer [41]. Furthermore, the Th1/Th17 balance has turned out to be associated with the prognosis of patients with colorectal tumors. Th1 cell-mediated anticancer responses are associated with better outcomes, whereas Th17 cell-mediated responses are associated with worse outcomes implicating that specific members of the gut microbiota promote IL-17A production, thereby contributing to carcinogenesis [42].

The role of intestinal microbiota in modulating response efficacy to ICI therapy has drawn considerable attention in recent years. In patients with melanoma, relative abundance of the Ruminococcaceae family is increased in responders who receive anti-PD1 therapy, while the poor responders exhibit increased counts of RORγt+ Th17 cells in tumors. FMT in GF mice has demonstrated that activation of Th17 cells and the polarization of IL-17A production in the tumor microenvironment are essentially mediated by components of the microbiota [43]. A study has shown that the number of pathogenic IL-17A+ IFN-γ+ and IL-22+ IFN-γ+ Th17 cell subsets is negatively regulated by intestinal HLA-DR-expressing-NKp44+-ILC3s in IBD patients [44]. IL-6 has been shown to trigger Th17 cell differentiation via STAT3 activation, thus promoting inflammation in IBD patients, whereas leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF)—a cytokine of the IL-6 family—effectively inhibits Th17 accumulation and promotes damaged intestinal epithelium repair [45]. In addition, the role of IL-6 in Th17 lineage priming and differentiation is tissue specific [46] and involves reversible induction of Th1-to-Th17 cell transdifferentiation in the intestine [47]. Smad7 is an intracellular inhibitor of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) signaling, whose expression in colorectal cancer-infiltrating Th17 cells increases tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interferon-γ (INF-γ) expression and decreases IL-17A expression that is responsible for effective killing of cancer cells [48]. Therefore, the plasticity of Th17 cells is dependent on the physiological or pathogenic cytokine milieu in vivo and interactions between different immune cells. However, precise driving factors for this shift remain less understood. Therefore, the development of therapeutic strategies targeting the IL-17 pathway needs to be carefully evaluated lest the potential side effects may hijack the beneficial functions of Th17 cells. The effects of SFB on Th17 cells in humans need further investigation, as it is not well known in human intestine.

3.2. Treg Cell Induction by Microbiota and Interactions with Other Immune Cells

Within the intestine, forkhead box P3 transcription factor- (Foxp3-) expressing Treg cells are primarily located in the LP [49] and have a fundamental role in immunological tolerance towards commensal microbiota. The Foxp3+ Treg repertoire is heavily influenced by the microbiota composition [50]. Upon migration to the epithelium, Tregs lose their Foxp3 expression and convert to effective CD4+ T cell in a microbiota-dependent manner [49].

Gut-derived Foxp3+ Treg cells are distinct from those in other organs and have gut-specific phenotypes and functions. Symbiotic bacteria, for instance, Clostridium species clusters [51, 52] and Bacteroides fragilis and its polysaccharide A [53], can facilitate the expansion and differentiation of intestinal Foxp3+-Tregs in addition to the production of IL-10 and TGF-β that regulate the functions of intestinal myeloid cells [54]. Some probiotic strains, for instance, Lactobacillus acidophilus, improve intestinal inflammation by modulating the balance of Th17 and Treg cells [55, 56]. SCFAs, which are an energy source for gut epithelial cells, serve an anti-inflammatory function by inhibiting HDACs in Tregs through G-protein-coupled receptors (GPRs). SCFAs can also promote naïve T cell differentiation into both effector T cells and Treg cells depending on the cytokine milieu, which is dependent on direct suppression of HDACs, independent of GPR41 or GPR43. Plasticity features of Foxp3+-Treg cells facilitate their acquisition of an effector T cell phenotype in highly virulent or inflammatory contexts, and their fates are controlled by pathogenic effector T cells [57].

RORγt+ Tregs are a distinct Treg population in the colon. The expression of transcription factor RORγt is induced by gut microbiota. The proportion of RORγt+ Tregs is much lower in GF mice than in their conventionally raised specific-pathogen-free (SPF) counterparts [58]. The context specificity of RORγ results in significantly different outcomes, even in closely related cell types, which are consistent with their involvement in a range of immunological and nonimmunological processes. A recent study has demonstrated that weaning immune reaction to microbiota is associated with the generation of RORγt+-Treg cells that decreases the susceptibility to allergic inflammation, colitis, and cancer later in life [59]. Moreover, in colorectal cancer (CAC) patients with IBD background, RORγt-expressing tumor-infiltrating Treg cells sustain tumor growth in a transcription factor FoxO3-dependent manner [60]. However, the frequency of RORγt+ Tregs correlates with the colitis score when momocolonized with different microbes in trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid- (TNBS-) challenged GF mice [58]. Foxp3+RORγt+ T cells are an important subset of effector Treg cells of the intestinal immune system that displays features of both Tregs and Th17 cells. They accumulate in the LP of IBD patients that have enhanced immunosuppressive capacity as compared with Foxp3+RORγt- Tregs during gut-specific immune responses [61]. However, a contradictory finding indicates that inactivation of RORγt in Treg cells has a minor effect on the balance of bacteria-specific Treg and Th17 cells and does not lead to inflammation. In addition, the expression of the transcription factor c-Maf is required for the terminal differentiation and function of RORγt+ Treg cells in inhibiting intestinal Th17 responses [62].

The close relationship between Th17 and Treg cells marks them important in modulating the immune responses and maintaining immune homeostasis. Molecular mediators that induce RORγt+ Treg development remain obscure. It is likely that SCFA is one of the mediators, and RORγt+ induction in Th17 and colonic Tregs may follow a different pathway [58]. Currently, availability of small-molecule inhibitors, such as TAK-828F, or activators of metabolic enzymes has made it possible to manipulate the metabolism of T cells and shift the Th17/Treg cell balance, providing a novel therapeutic option for the treatment of inflammatory and immune diseases [27, 63].

3.3. Regulation of Intestinal T Follicular Helper (Tfh) Cells by Microbiota

Tfh has been identified as the chief cell subpopulation regulating B cells in germinal centers (GCs) that promotes high-affinity antibody production. Tfh development is deficient in GF mice and can be restored when fed by toll-like receptor-2 (TLR2) agonists via activating intrinsic MyD88 signaling [64]. Ablation of Tfh cells results in reduced amount of PPs, IgG1, and GC B cells. And significantly changes the gut microbiome composition [26]. Thus, Tfh cell activity is important for the generation of a diverse microbiota community in the gut. IL-21 produced by Tfh cells in PPs is essential in driving the GC reaction and high-affinity sIgA production in the small intestine [26]. IL-21R-deficient mice exhibit a significant decrease in IgA+ plasmablasts and plasma cells, in response to SFB in the small intestine [65]. SFB can also drive differentiation of PP Tfh cells and egress into systemic sites, boosting systemic Tfh cell responses and autoantibody production that exacerbates arthritis [66]. Microbiota-derived extracellular ATP (eATP) limits Tfh cell expansion and GC reaction in the PPs via P2X7, regulates Tfh cell abundance, and affects high-affinity sIgA response against intestinal colonizing bacteria that leads to enteropathogenic infection [67, 68]. Thus, microbiota-derived eATP is an important signaling molecule, which can be a further modulation target of the intestinal immunity against intestinal bacteria. Several transcription factors are involved in the divergent functions of Tfh. Activating transcription factor 3 (ATF3) can protect against colitis by regulating Tfhs in the gut [69]. Interferon regulatory factor 8- (IRF8-) regulated Tfhs can function as pathogenic mediators of colitis in IBD, which is independent of B cells [70]. Transcription factor c-Maf is expressed early in Tfh cell precursors and identified as a regulator in the differentiation of Tfh cells in a cell-autonomous fashion [71].

Antibodies produced in the GC need precisely targeting of foreign pathogens while limiting excessive inflammation and autoimmunity for maintaining normal intestinal circumstances. T follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells, a recently identified cell subset, can migrate to the GC and inhibit Tfh-mediated B cell activation and Ig production. Deep understanding of Tfr cell function has potential to provide new insights into developing more effective vaccine strategies and new methods to treat antibody-mediated diseases [72].

4. Induction of Antivirus and Anticancer Immunity of Intestinal CD8+ T Cells by Gut Microbiota and Metabolites

The effects of intestinal microbiota and metabolites on intestinal CD8+ T cells functions are relatively uncharacterized. Previous studies have shown that recolonization of VSL#3 and L. johnsonii results in restoration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell population in the small and large intestinal LP and mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs) or partial restoration upon FMT after broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy [8, 10]. SCFAs, especially butyrate, directly modulate IFN-γ and granzyme B gene expression of CD8+ CTLs and IL-17-producing CD8+ T cells (Tc17 cells) in MLNs, which is mediated by inhibition of HDACs, independent of GPR41 and GPR43. Moreover, this influence is similar to the effects exerted by the pan-HDAC inhibitors trichostatin A (TSA) and sodium valproate [73]. It is shown that a consortium of 11 bacterial strains obtained from healthy human donor feces is capable of robustly inducing IFN-γ-producing CD8+ T cells in the intestine. Their colonization enhances both host resistance to Listeria monocytogenes infection and the therapeutic efficacy of ICIs in syngeneic tumor models [74].

IELs that distribute along the intestinal epithelium are a large and diverse population of lymphoid cells, which are classified into TCR+ and TCR- subsets. The former is similar to conventional T cells, whereas the latter functions resembling ILCs. Natural TCR+ IELs include TCRαβ+ or TCRγδ+ T cells. In the small intestine of mice, 50%–60% of the IELs are TCRγδ+ cells, whereas in humans, CD8αβ+ IELs are the predominant population. There exists an intricate interaction between IEL subsets and IECs in the intestine, and other immune cells outside IECs [75]. Colonization of commensal microbiota in early life is important for the development of diet-induced CD8αβ+ IELs [76]. Intestinal microbiota, such as Bacteroidales, recruits IL-6-producing IELs promoting intestinal epithelial proliferation, contributing to barrier integrity [77]. In antibiotic-treated and GF mice, the proportion and absolute number of CD8αβ+ IELs drop significantly. Microarray analysis has revealed that CD8αβ+ IELs expressed a series of genes encoding potent AMPs, which is supported by an antimicrobial-activity assay [78]. γδ+ IELs can promptly migrate to and remain localized near IEC lumen in direct contact with bacteria in the case of pathogen invasion within hours, suggesting their essential role in early host defense against pathogen invasion [79]. Their activation is dependent on microbe-activated secretion of intrinsic MyD88 by IECs [80]. Assay for Transposase-Accessible Chromatin with high-throughput sequencing (ATAC-seq) of intestinal αβ+ and γδ+ IELs has disclosed that their enhancer-associated transcription factors, signaling networks, and metabolic pathways are affected by the microbiota [12].

In mice, the small intestine contains CD4+CD8αα+ double-positive IELs (DP IELs), which have regulatory functions originated from intestinal CD4+ T cells through downstream of the transcriptional factor Thpok. Uncommon in human adults, the differentiation of DP IELs depends on microbial colonization because they are not present in GF mice [81]. Lactobacillus reuteri may reprogram intraepithelial CD4+ T cells into DP IELs in both GF mice and conventionally raised counterparts lacking these cells. Though not shaping the DP-IEL-TCR repertoire, it generates indole derivatives of tryptophan activating the aryl-hydrocarbon receptor that downregulates Thpok and promoting CD4+ T cell differentiation into DP IELs. Thus, L. reuteri, together with a tryptophan-rich diet, results in the reprograming of IELs into cells of regulatory phenotype [82].

5. Induction of sIgA Production by Gut Microbiota and Metabolites

In the gut lumen, sIgA serves as a first-line barrier protecting the epithelium from invasion of pathogens and toxins by promoting mutualistic microbe colonization and neutralization of invasive pathogens. SIgA coats bacteria and other targets, thus preventing them from direct contact with the host intestinal immune system. A high level of sIgA production results from the interactions of intestinal Tfhs and B cells in the GCs. Due to sustained microbial antigen exposure, intestinal lymphoid tissues generate flora-reactive IgA-producing B cells [83]. Maturation of isolated lymphoid follicles (ILFs) into large B cell clusters requires the detection of bacteria by pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) [84]. Peptidoglycan from gram-negative bacteria is necessary for the induction of ILFs in mice through recognition by the nucleotide oligomerization domain 1 (NOD1) receptor in epithelial cells and other signaling through the chemokine receptor CCR6 [83].

Intestinal microbiota influences not only the accumulation of sIgA-producing plasma cells but also the diversity of IgA in intestine lymphocyte tissue which has been demonstrated in gnotobiotic mice colonized with defined microbial consortia [85]. IgA directly participate in shaping the microbial community landscape. During infection, sIgA-coated pathogens are cleared via a process called immune exclusion [86, 87]. The diversity of IgA on the mammalian intestinal surface is paralleled with the intestinal taxa diversity [88]. PPs are essential sites for the TD IgA generation, contributing not only to the generation of somatically mutated gut antigen-specific IgAs production but also to the diversification of nonspecific antigen of the B cell repertoire [89, 90]. Moreover, PP can be substituted as the inductive sites for IgA production with the stimulation of specific immunostimulatory or pathogenic bacteria, such as SFB [84]. B cell development in GALT is also driven by super-antigen-like molecules, such as spores of Bacillus subtilis and other species of Bacillus [91]. SCFAs can promote IgA production through regulating the metabolism and gene expression in B cells independent of T cells [92, 93].

SIgA in response to the commensal microbiota is produced through a T cell-independent (TI) mechanism which has been confirmed in TCRαβ and TCRγδ T cell-deficient mice. These processes may not require PP-organized B cell follicles, which are specific for particular bacterial species. The intestinal TI-IgAs are highly stable antibody repertoires that perform a dual role in the protection against invading pathogens and the regulation of the composition of nonpathogenic microbial communities [94, 95].

5.1. Interactions of sIgA with Other Immune Cells and Tolerance Induction

Plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) are essential for the induction of plasma cells in response to oral immunization and noninfectious antibody responses with the production of TD or TI-IgA in the intestine [96, 97]. PP IgA production, affinity maturation, and class switch recombination require PP subepithelial dome DC–B cell interactions, which are dependent on the secretion of TGF-β by ILCs [89]. The bacteria-loaded DCs induce the differentiation of B cells into IgA+ plasma cells from lymphoid structures to LP, dimeric IgA secretion, and restrict the mucosal immunity locally [98]. In turn, sIgA-coated commensal bacteria contribute mucosal DCs towards tolerogenic profiles [99] and Treg cell expansion and IL-10 production, which dampen mucosal and systemic autoimmunity [100].

Human gut bacterial taxa targeted by IgA in the setting of barrier dysfunction result in intestinal pathology that may be attributed to the adhesion of these taxa to intestinal microfold (M) cells, a subset of IECs residing in the region of the epithelium covering PPs. For instance, the sIgA-coated Clostridium difficile [101] and adherent-invasive E. coli [102], which are located in proximity to the intestinal epithelium, elicit a Th17-cell-dependent sIgA-mediated response. The precise link of sIgA diversification and specific antigenic functions in modulating the microbiota composition, location, and metabolism are yet to be elucidated [88]. A novel technology of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing of immunoglobulin A- (IgA-) coated bacteria (IgA-SEQ) may be helpful in the isolation and identification of unique colitogenic intestinal bacteria [103].

In brief, commensal microbiota trains and regulates the development and maturation of the intestinal adaptive immune system. Under a steady state, the mucosal adaptive immune cells, especially Tregs and Tfh, and sIgA coordinate with IECs, DCs, and ILCs contributing to a tolerogenic state of intestinal ecological environment, maintaining intestinal homeostasis and mutualistic relationship between the host and the microbiota, thus preserving the ability of eliciting an efficient immune response to infectious agents. In the case of dysbiosis, the equilibrium is disturbed that leads to chronic inflammatory and autoimmune pathology. Mechanisms of intestinal microbiota modulation of intestinal adaptive immunity are depicted in Figure 1.

6. Conclusions and Perspectives

Under a steady state, commensal microbiota and intestinal adaptive immune cells and sIgA coordinate to contribute towards tolerance for symbiotic bacteria and mutualistic relationship between the host and the microbiota. This ultimately results in maintenance of intestinal homeostasis and the retention of the ability to elicit an efficient immune response to invading pathogenic agents. When this equilibrium relationship is disturbed, dysbiosis and intestinal immunological abnormalities develop leading to chronic local and systemic inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Identifying effector microorganisms, derived molecules, and metabolites that causally affect an immune phenotype holds the key for deciphering the underlying mechanisms and the development of microbiota-based therapeutics [104106]. The present-day widely applied molecular sequencing-based methods do not allow for the isolation of specific organisms, hindering the exploration of the association of their functional roles with host-specific immune parameters and definite disease phenotype. In the near future, database-centered predictions of strain-media, IgA-SEQ, engineered bacteria, high-throughput culturing, and microfluidic assays [106108] may help to isolate uncultivated species of interest [109, 110]. These technical advances may thus provide utmost probabilities for exploring the mechanisms of microbiota-host interactions improving diagnostic and therapeutic applications.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


The project was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD091102).


  1. M. Levy, A. A. Kolodziejczyk, C. A. Thaiss, and E. Elinav, “Dysbiosis and the immune system,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 219–232, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. A. M. Kabat, N. Srinivasan, and K. J. Maloy, “Modulation of immune development and function by intestinal microbiota,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 507–517, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. C. Gunther, C. Josenhans, and J. Wehkamp, “Crosstalk between microbiota, pathogens and the innate immune responses,” International Journal of Medical Microbiology, vol. 306, no. 5, pp. 257–265, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Honda and D. R. Littman, “The microbiota in adaptive immune homeostasis and disease,” Nature, vol. 535, no. 7610, pp. 75–84, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. W. W. Agace and K. D. McCoy, “Regionalized development and maintenance of the intestinal adaptive immune landscape,” Immunity, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 532–548, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. Q. N. Nguyen, J. E. Himes, D. R. Martinez, and S. R. Permar, “The impact of the gut microbiota on humoral immunity to pathogens and vaccination in early infancy,” PLOS Pathogens, vol. 12, no. 12, article e1005997, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. M. Meisel, T. Mayassi, H. Fehlner-Peach et al., “Interleukin-15 promotes intestinal dysbiosis with butyrate deficiency associated with increased susceptibility to colitis,” The ISME Journal, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. C. Y. Chiu, Y. L. Chan, M. H. Tsai, C. J. Wang, M. H. Chiang, and C. C. Chiu, “Gut microbial dysbiosis is associated with allergen-specific IgE responses in young children with airway allergies,” World Allergy Organization Journal, vol. 12, no. 3, article 100021, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. I. Ekmekciu, E. von Klitzing, U. Fiebiger et al., “The probiotic compound VSL#3 modulates mucosal, peripheral, and systemic immunity following murine broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 7, article 167, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. Y. D. Ren, Z. S. Ye, L. Z. Yang et al., “Fecal microbiota transplantation induces hepatitis B virus e-antigen (HBeAg) clearance in patients with positive HBeAg after long-term antiviral therapy,” Hepatology, vol. 65, no. 5, pp. 1765–1768, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. I. Ekmekciu, E. von Klitzing, C. Neumann et al., “Fecal microbiota transplantation, commensal Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus johnsonii strains differentially restore intestinal and systemic adaptive immune cell populations following broad-spectrum antibiotic treatment,” Frontiers in Microbiology, vol. 8, article 2430, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. N. P. Semenkovich, J. D. Planer, P. P. Ahern, N. W. Griffin, C. Y. Lin, and J. I. Gordon, “Impact of the gut microbiota on enhancer accessibility in gut intraepithelial lymphocytes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 113, no. 51, pp. 14805–14810, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. T. Xu, K. M. Stewart, X. Wang et al., “Metabolic control of TH17 and induced Treg cell balance by an epigenetic mechanism,” Nature, vol. 548, no. 7666, pp. 228–233, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. L. Chen, M. Sun, W. Wu et al., “Microbiota metabolite butyrate differentially regulates Th1 and Th17 cells’ differentiation and function in induction of colitis,” Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 1450–1461, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. S. Roy and G. Trinchieri, “Microbiota: a key orchestrator of cancer therapy,” Nature Reviews. Cancer, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 271–285, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. J. M. Pitt, M. Vetizou, N. Waldschmitt et al., “Fine-tuning cancer immunotherapy: optimizing the gut microbiome,” Cancer Research, vol. 76, no. 16, pp. 4602–4607, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. B. Routy, E. Le Chatelier, L. Derosa et al., “Gut microbiome influences efficacy of PD-1–based immunotherapy against epithelial tumors,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6371, pp. 91–97, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. A. Sivan, L. Corrales, N. Hubert et al., “Commensal Bifidobacterium promotes antitumor immunity and facilitates anti-PD-L1 efficacy,” Science, vol. 350, no. 6264, pp. 1084–1089, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. Matson, J. Fessler, R. Bao et al., “The commensal microbiome is associated with anti-PD-1 efficacy in metastatic melanoma patients,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6371, pp. 104–108, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. M. Vetizou, J. M. Pitt, R. Daillere et al., “Anticancer immunotherapy by CTLA-4 blockade relies on the gut microbiota,” Science, vol. 350, no. 6264, pp. 1079–1084, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. P. Chairatana and E. M. Nolan, “Defensins, lectins, mucins, and secretory immunoglobulin A: microbe-binding biomolecules that contribute to mucosal immunity in the human gut,” Critical Reviews in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 45–56, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. F. Melo-Gonzalez, H. Kammoun, E. Evren et al., “Antigen-presenting ILC3 regulate T cell–dependent IgA responses to colonic mucosal bacteria,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 216, no. 4, pp. 728–742, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. M. S. Ladinsky, L. P. Araujo, X. Zhang et al., “Endocytosis of commensal antigens by intestinal epithelial cells regulates mucosal T cell homeostasis,” Science, vol. 363, no. 6431, article eaat4042, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. Q. Zhao and C. O. Elson, “Adaptive immune education by gut microbiota antigens,” Immunology, vol. 154, no. 1, pp. 28–37, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. Feng and C. O. Elson, “Adaptive immunity in the host-microbiota dialog,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 15–21, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. L. Jones, W. Q. Ho, S. Ying et al., “A subpopulation of high IL-21-producing CD4+ T cells in Peyer’s Patches is induced by the microbiota and regulates germinal centers,” Scientific Reports, vol. 6, no. 1, article 30784, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. L. Sun, J. Fu, and Y. Zhou, “Metabolism controls the balance of Th17/T-regulatory cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, article 1632, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. M. Kespohl, N. Vachharajani, M. Luu et al., “The microbial metabolite butyrate induces expression of Th1-associated factors in CD4+ T Cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, article 1036, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. G. J. Britton, E. J. Contijoch, I. Mogno et al., “Microbiotas from humans with inflammatory bowel disease alter the balance of gut Th17 and RORγt+ regulatory T cells and exacerbate colitis in mice,” Immunity, vol. 50, no. 1, pp. 212–224.e4, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. L. Han, H. Jin, L. Zhou et al., “Intestinal microbiota at engraftment influence acute graft-versus-host disease via the Treg/Th17 balance in allo-HSCT recipients,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. E. Bettelli, Y. Carrier, W. Gao et al., “Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells,” Nature, vol. 441, no. 7090, pp. 235–238, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. M. Romano, S. L. Tung, L. A. Smyth, and G. Lombardi, “Treg therapy in transplantation: a general overview,” Transplant International, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 745–753, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. C. T. Weaver, C. O. Elson, L. A. Fouser, and J. K. Kolls, “The Th17 pathway and inflammatory diseases of the intestines, lungs, and skin,” Annual Review of Pathology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 477–512, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. B. Stockinger and S. Omenetti, “The dichotomous nature of T helper 17 cells,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 535–544, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. K. Hirota, J. E. Turner, M. Villa et al., “Plasticity of Th17 cells in Peyer’s patches is responsible for the induction of T cell-dependent IgA responses,” Nature Immunology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 372–379, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Zhao, Y. Tan, Q. Peng et al., “IL-6/STAT3 pathway induced deficiency of RFX1 contributes to Th17-dependent autoimmune diseases via epigenetic regulation,” Nature Communications, vol. 9, no. 1, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. K. Atarashi, T. Tanoue, M. Ando et al., “Th17 cell induction by adhesion of microbes to intestinal epithelial cells,” Cell, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 367–380, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. Y. Yang, M. B. Torchinsky, M. Gobert et al., “Focused specificity of intestinal TH17 cells towards commensal bacterial antigens,” Nature, vol. 510, no. 7503, pp. 152–156, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. J. Yi, J. Jung, D. Han, C. D. Surh, and Y. J. Lee, “Segmented filamentous bacteria induce divergent populations of antigen-specific CD4 T cells in the small intestine,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 228–236, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. A. Ueno, L. Jeffery, T. Kobayashi, T. Hibi, S. Ghosh, and H. Jijon, “Th17 plasticity and its relevance to inflammatory bowel disease,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 87, no. 3, pp. 38–49, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. S. H. Wong, L. Zhao, X. Zhang et al., “Gavage of fecal samples from patients with colorectal cancer promotes intestinal carcinogenesis in germ-free and conventional mice,” Gastroenterology, vol. 153, no. 6, pp. 1621–1633.e6, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. C. G. Hurtado, F. Wan, F. Housseau, and C. L. Sears, “Roles for interleukin 17 and adaptive immunity in pathogenesis of colorectal cancer,” Gastroenterology, vol. 155, no. 6, pp. 1706–1715, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. V. Gopalakrishnan, C. N. Spencer, L. Nezi et al., “Gut microbiome modulates response to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in melanoma patients,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6371, pp. 97–103, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. J. Li, A. L. Doty, Y. Tang et al., “Enrichment of IL‐17A+IFN‐γ+ and IL‐22+IFN‐γ+ T cell subsets is associated with reduction of NKp44+ILC3s in the terminal ileum of Crohn’s disease patients,” Clinical and Experimental Immunology, vol. 190, no. 1, pp. 143–153, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. Y. S. Zhang, D. E. Xin, Z. Wang et al., “STAT4 activation by leukemia inhibitory factor confers a therapeutic effect on intestinal inflammation,” The EMBO Journal, vol. 38, no. 6, article e99595, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. W. Hu and C. Pasare, “Location, location, location: tissue-specific regulation of immune responses,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 94, no. 3, pp. 409–421, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. J. Geginat, M. Paroni, I. Kastirr, P. Larghi, M. Pagani, and S. Abrignani, “Reverse plasticity: TGF-β and IL-6 induce Th1-to-Th17-cell transdifferentiation in the gut,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 2306–2310, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. A. Rizzo, V. de Mare, C. Rocchi et al., “Smad7 induces plasticity in tumor-infiltrating Th17 cells and enables TNF-alpha-mediated killing of colorectal cancer cells,” Carcinogenesis, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 1536–1546, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. Sujino, M. London, D. P. Hoytema van Konijnenburg et al., “Tissue adaptation of regulatory and intraepithelial CD4+ T cells controls gut inflammation,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6293, pp. 1581–1586, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. P. Kraj and L. Ignatowicz, “The mechanisms shaping the repertoire of CD4(+) Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells,” Immunology, vol. 153, no. 3, pp. 290–296, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. K. Atarashi, T. Tanoue, T. Shima et al., “Induction of colonic regulatory T cells by indigenous Clostridium species,” Science, vol. 331, no. 6015, pp. 337–341, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  52. K. Atarashi, T. Tanoue, K. Oshima et al., “Treg induction by a rationally selected mixture of Clostridia strains from the human microbiota,” Nature, vol. 500, no. 7461, pp. 232–236, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  53. J. L. Round and S. K. Mazmanian, “Inducible Foxp3+ regulatory T-cell development by a commensal bacterium of the intestinal microbiota,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 107, no. 27, pp. 12204–12209, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  54. H. Kayama and K. Takeda, “Regulation of intestinal homeostasis by innate and adaptive immunity,” International Immunology, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 673–680, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. J. Park, M. Kim, S. G. Kang et al., “Short-chain fatty acids induce both effector and regulatory T cells by suppression of histone deacetylases and regulation of the mTOR-S6K pathway,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 80–93, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. J. S. Park, J. W. Choi, J. Jhun et al., “Lactobacillus acidophilus improves intestinal inflammation in an acute colitis mouse model by regulation of Th17 and Treg cell balance and fibrosis development,” Journal of Medicinal Food, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 215–224, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. G. Oldenhove, N. Bouladoux, E. A. Wohlfert et al., “Decrease of Foxp3+ Treg cell number and acquisition of effector cell phenotype during lethal infection,” Immunity, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 772–786, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  58. E. Sefik, N. Geva-Zatorsky, S. Oh et al., “Individual intestinal symbionts induce a distinct population of RORγ+ regulatory T cells,” Science, vol. 349, no. 6251, pp. 993–997, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. Z. Al Nabhani, S. Dulauroy, R. Marques et al., “A weaning reaction to microbiota is required for resistance to immunopathologies in the adult,” Immunity, vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 1276–1288.e5, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  60. A. Rizzo, M. di Giovangiulio, C. Stolfi et al., “RORγt-expressing Tregs drive the growth of colitis-associated colorectal cancer by controlling IL6 in dendritic cells,” Cancer Immunology Research, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 1082–1092, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. B. H. Yang, S. Hagemann, P. Mamareli et al., “Foxp3+ T cells expressing RORγt represent a stable regulatory T-cell effector lineage with enhanced suppressive capacity during intestinal inflammation,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 444–457, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. C. Neumann, J. Blume, U. Roy et al., “c-Maf-dependent Treg cell control of intestinal TH17 cells and IgA establishes host-microbiota homeostasis,” Nature Immunology, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 471–481, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  63. A. Shibata, K. Uga, T. Sato et al., “Pharmacological inhibitory profile of TAK-828F, a potent and selective orally available RORγt inverse agonist,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 150, pp. 35–45, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  64. J. L. Kubinak, C. Petersen, W. Z. Stephens et al., “MyD88 signaling in T cells directs IgA-mediated control of the microbiota to promote health,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 153–163, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  65. H. Cho, H. Jaime, R. P. de Oliveira et al., “Defective IgA response to atypical intestinal commensals in IL-21 receptor deficiency reshapes immune cell homeostasis and mucosal immunity,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 85–96, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  66. F. Teng, C. N. Klinger, K. M. Felix et al., “Gut microbiota drive autoimmune arthritis by promoting differentiation and migration of Peyer’s patch T follicular helper cells,” Immunity, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 875–888, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  67. L. Perruzza, G. Gargari, M. Proietti et al., “T follicular helper cells promote a beneficial gut ecosystem for host metabolic homeostasis by sensing microbiota-derived extracellular ATP,” Cell Reports, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2566–2575, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  68. M. Proietti, L. Perruzza, D. Scribano et al., “ATP released by intestinal bacteria limits the generation of protective IgA against enteropathogens,” Nature Communications, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 250, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  69. Y. Cao, Q. Yang, H. Deng et al., “Transcriptional factor ATF3 protects against colitis by regulating follicular helper T cells in Peyer’s patches,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 116, no. 13, pp. 6286–6291, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  70. R. Zhang, C. F. Qi, Y. Hu et al., “T follicular helper cells restricted by IRF8 contribute to T cell-mediated inflammation,” Journal of Autoimmunity, vol. 96, pp. 113–122, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  71. F. Andris, S. Denanglaire, M. Anciaux, M. Hercor, H. Hussein, and O. Leo, “The transcription factor c-Maf promotes the differentiation of follicular helper T cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, p. 480, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  72. P. T. Sage and A. H. Sharpe, “T follicular regulatory cells,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 271, no. 1, pp. 246–259, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  73. M. Luu, K. Weigand, F. Wedi et al., “Regulation of the effector function of CD8+ T cells by gut microbiota-derived metabolite butyrate,” Scientific Reports, vol. 8, no. 1, article 14430, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  74. T. Tanoue, S. Morita, D. R. Plichta et al., “A defined commensal consortium elicits CD8 T cells and anti-cancer immunity,” Nature, vol. 565, no. 7741, pp. 600–605, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  75. D. Olivares-Villagomez and L. Van Kaer, “Intestinal intraepithelial lymphocytes: sentinels of the mucosal barrier,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 264–275, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  76. J. Jung, C. D. Surh, and Y. J. Lee, “Microbial colonization at early life promotes the development of diet-induced CD8αβ intraepithelial T cells,” Molecules and Cells, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 313–320, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  77. K. A. Kuhn, H. M. Schulz, E. H. Regner et al., “Bacteroidales recruit IL-6-producing intraepithelial lymphocytes in the colon to promote barrier integrity,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 357–368, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  78. B. Chen, X. Ni, R. Sun et al., “Commensal bacteria-dependent CD8αβ+ T cells in the intestinal epithelium produce antimicrobial peptides,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, article 1065, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  79. K. L. Edelblum, G. Singh, M. A. Odenwald et al., “γδ intraepithelial lymphocyte migration limits transepithelial pathogen invasion and systemic disease in mice,” Gastroenterology, vol. 148, no. 7, pp. 1417–1426, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  80. A. S. Ismail, K. M. Severson, S. Vaishnava et al., “γδ intraepithelial lymphocytes are essential mediators of host–microbial homeostasis at the intestinal mucosal surface,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 108, no. 21, pp. 8743–8748, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  81. C. Wu, R. B. Sartor, K. Huang, and S. L. Tonkonogy, “Transient activation of mucosal effector immune responses by resident intestinal bacteria in normal hosts is regulated by interleukin-10 signalling,” Immunology, vol. 148, no. 3, pp. 304–314, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  82. L. Cervantes-Barragan, J. N. Chai, M. D. Tianero et al., “Lactobacillus reuteri induces gut intraepithelial CD4+CD8αα+ T cells,” Science, vol. 357, no. 6353, pp. 806–810, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  83. D. Bouskra, C. Brézillon, M. Bérard et al., “Lymphoid tissue genesis induced by commensals through NOD1 regulates intestinal homeostasis,” Nature, vol. 456, no. 7221, pp. 507–510, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  84. M. Buettner and M. Lochner, “Development and function of secondary and tertiary lymphoid organs in the small intestine and the colon,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 7, p. 342, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  85. C. Moon, M. T. Baldridge, M. A. Wallace, C. A. D. Burnham, H. W. Virgin, and T. S. Stappenbeck, “Vertically transmitted faecal IgA levels determine extra-chromosomal phenotypic variation,” Nature, vol. 521, no. 7550, pp. 90–93, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  86. A. M. Roche, A. L. Richard, J. T. Rahkola, E. N. Janoff, and J. N. Weiser, “Antibody blocks acquisition of bacterial colonization through agglutination,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 176–185, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  87. O. Pabst, “New concepts in the generation and functions of IgA,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 821–832, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  88. A. J. Macpherson, B. Yilmaz, J. P. Limenitakis, and S. C. Ganal-Vonarburg, “IgA function in relation to the intestinal microbiota,” Annual Review of Immunology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 359–381, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  89. A. Reboldi, T. I. Arnon, L. B. Rodda, A. Atakilit, D. Sheppard, and J. G. Cyster, “IgA production requires B cell interaction with subepithelial dendritic cells in Peyer’s patches,” Science, vol. 352, no. 6287, article aaf4822, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  90. A. Reboldi and J. G. Cyster, “Peyer’s patches: organizing B-cell responses at the intestinal frontier,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 271, no. 1, pp. 230–245, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  91. K. M. Severson, M. Mallozzi, A. Driks, and K. L. Knight, “B cell development in GALT: role of bacterial superantigen-like molecules,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 12, pp. 6782–6789, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  92. M. Kim, Y. Qie, J. Park, and C. H. Kim, “Gut microbial metabolites fuel host antibody responses,” Cell Host & Microbe, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 202–214, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  93. W. Wu, M. Sun, F. Chen et al., “Microbiota metabolite short-chain fatty acid acetate promotes intestinal IgA response to microbiota which is mediated by GPR43,” Mucosal Immunology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 946–956, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  94. M. Bemark, P. Boysen, and N. Y. Lycke, “Induction of gut IgA production through T cell-dependent and T cell-independent pathways,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1247, no. 1, pp. 97–116, 2012. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  95. D. Allman, J. R. Wilmore, and B. T. Gaudette, “The continuing story of T-cell independent antibodies,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 288, no. 1, pp. 128–135, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  96. H. Tezuka, Y. Abe, J. Asano et al., “Prominent role for plasmacytoid dendritic cells in mucosal T cell-independent IgA induction,” Immunity, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 247–257, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  97. L. Moro-Sibilot, S. This, P. Blanc et al., “Plasmacytoid dendritic cells are dispensable for noninfectious intestinal IgA responses in vivo,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 354–359, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  98. A. J. Macpherson and T. Uhr, “Induction of protective IgA by intestinal dendritic cells carrying commensal bacteria,” Science, vol. 303, no. 5664, pp. 1662–1665, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  99. J. Diana, I. C. Moura, C. Vaugier et al., “Secretory IgA induces tolerogenic dendritic cells through SIGNR1 dampening autoimmunity in mice,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 191, no. 5, pp. 2335–2343, 2013. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  100. J. Mikulic, S. Longet, L. Favre, J. Benyacoub, and B. Corthesy, “Secretory IgA in complex with Lactobacillus rhamnosuspotentiates mucosal dendritic cell-mediated Treg cell differentiation via TLR regulatory proteins, RALDH2 and secretion of IL-10 and TGF-β,” Cellular & Molecular Immunology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 546–556, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  101. M. Džunková, A. Moya, J. F. Vázquez-Castellanos et al., “Active and secretory IgA-coated bacterial fractions elucidate dysbiosis in Clostridium difficile infection,” mSphere, vol. 1, no. 3, article e00101-16, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  102. M. Viladomiu, C. Kivolowitz, A. Abdulhamid et al., “IgA-coated E. coli enriched in Crohn’s disease spondyloarthritis promote TH17-dependent inflammation,” Science Translational Medicine, vol. 9, no. 376, article eaaf9655, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  103. N. W. Palm, M. R. de Zoete, T. W. Cullen et al., “Immunoglobulin A coating identifies colitogenic bacteria in inflammatory bowel disease,” Cell, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 1000–1010, 2014. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  104. N. Geva-Zatorsky, E. Sefik, L. Kua et al., “Mining the human gut microbiota for immunomodulatory organisms,” Cell, vol. 168, no. 5, pp. 928–943.e11, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  105. A. N. Skelly, Y. Sato, S. Kearney, and K. Honda, “Mining the microbiota for microbial and metabolite-based immunotherapies,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 305–323, 2019. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  106. M. Rajpoot, A. K. Sharma, A. Sharma, and G. K. Gupta, “Understanding the microbiome: emerging biomarkers for exploiting the microbiota for personalized medicine against cancer,” Seminars in Cancer Biology, vol. 52, Part 1, pp. 1–8, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  107. D. Rojo, C. Méndez-García, B. A. Raczkowska et al., “Exploring the human microbiome from multiple perspectives: factors altering its composition and function,” FEMS Microbiology Reviews, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 453–478, 2017. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  108. D. T. Riglar and P. A. Silver, “Engineering bacteria for diagnostic and therapeutic applications,” Nature Reviews. Microbiology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 214–225, 2018. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  109. M. A. Oberhardt, R. Zarecki, S. Gronow et al., “Harnessing the landscape of microbial culture media to predict new organism–media pairings,” Nature Communications, vol. 6, no. 1, article 8493, 2015. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  110. J. T. Lau, F. J. Whelan, I. Herath et al., “Capturing the diversity of the human gut microbiota through culture-enriched molecular profiling,” Genome Medicine, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 72, 2016. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2019 Li Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.