Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Journal of Immunology Research
Volume 2019, Article ID 5836476, 14 pages
https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5836476
Research Article

Altered Metabolism of Phospholipases, Diacylglycerols, Endocannabinoids, and N-Acylethanolamines in Patients with Mastocytosis

1Department of Translational Medical Sciences and Center for Basic and Clinical Immunology Research (CISI), University of Naples Federico II, WAO Center of Excellence, Naples, Italy
2Endocannabinoid Research Group, Istituto di Chimica Biomolecolare-Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (ICB-CNR), Pozzuoli, Italy
3Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Salerno, Italy
4Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
5Monaldi Hospital Pharmacy, Naples, Italy
6Canada Excellence Research Chair on the Microbiome-Endocannabinoidome Axis in Metabolic Health, Université Laval, Centre de Recherche de l’Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et Pneumologie de Quèbec, and Institut sur la Nutrition et les Aliments Fonctionnels, Québec City, Canada

Correspondence should be addressed to Maria Rosaria Galdiero; ti.aninu@oreidlag.airasorairam

Received 30 October 2018; Revised 2 April 2019; Accepted 14 May 2019; Published 1 July 2019

Academic Editor: Enrique Ortega

Copyright © 2019 Anne Lise Ferrara et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background. Mastocytosis is a condition characterized by the expansion and accumulation of mast cells (MCs) in various organs. The symptoms are related to the increased release of MC-derived mediators that exert local and distant effects. MCs are a source and target of phospholipase enzymes (PLs), which catalyze the cleavage of membrane phospholipids releasing lipid mediators (e.g., diacylglycerols (DAGs) and the endocannabinoid (EC) 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG)). To date, there are no data on the role of these lipid mediators in mastocytosis. Here, we analyzed plasma levels of PLA2, PLC, DAG, ECs, and EC-related N-acylethanolamines in patients with mastocytosis. Methods. In 23 patients with mastocytosis and 23 healthy individuals, we measured plasma PLA2 and PLC activities, DAG, 2-AG, anandamide (AEA), palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), and oleoylethanolamide (OEA). Results. Plasma PLA2 and PLC activities were increased in mastocytosis patients compared to controls. Concentrations of DAG (18:1 20:4 and 18:0 20:4), two second messengers produced by PLC, were higher in mastocytosis compared to controls, whereas the concentrations of their metabolite, 2-AG, were not altered. AEA was decreased in mastocytosis patients compared to controls; by contrast, AEA congener, PEA, was increased. PLA2 and PLC activities were increased only in patients with mediator-related symptoms. Moreover, PLC activity was positively correlated with disease severity and tryptase concentrations. By contrast, AEA was negatively correlated with tryptase concentrations. Conclusions. PLs and some lipid mediators are altered in patients with mastocytosis. Our results may pave the way for investigating the functions of these mediators in the pathophysiology of mastocytosis and provide new potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

1. Introduction

Mastocytosis is a disease characterized by the abnormal proliferation and/or accumulation of clonal mast cells (MCs) in the skin and other organs [1]. The pathogenesis of mastocytosis is related to an activating mutation of the KIT receptor localized on MCs, which leads to uncontrolled MC proliferation [2].

Patients with mastocytosis can be classified into two main groups characterized by different clinical courses and prognosis: cutaneous mastocytosis (CM) and systemic mastocytosis (SM) [3]. In CM, MC accumulation is limited to the skin, whereas in SM, at least one extracutaneous tissue is involved. The variants of mastocytosis are shown in Supplementary Table 1 [4]. In the majority of patients with mastocytosis, symptoms are due to the activation and degranulation of MCs and are the consequences of their local or systemic effects [5]. Mediator-related symptoms and clinical signs are found in all variants of mastocytosis and may involve different organ systems [6].

MCs produce a plethora of preformed (histamine, tryptase, etc.) and de novo synthesized (lipids, cytokines, etc.) mediators, which exert different biological effects [7, 8]. Activated MCs express and release phospholipase enzymes (PLs) which catalyze the cleavage of membrane phospholipids [9, 10]. There are four classes of phospholipases termed A (PLA), B (PLB), C (PLC), and D (PLD) [1113], distinguished by substrate specificity, subcellular location, and functional importance of their phospholipid metabolites. Enzymatic processing of phospholipids by PLs converts them into lipid mediators or second messengers (such as diacylglycerols (DAGs), endocannabinoids (ECs), and arachidonic acid (AA)), which activate effector enzymes (such as protein kinase C (PKC)) and regulate multiple cellular processes of several cells including MCs [1416].

Secreted PLA2 (sPLA2s), expressed by MCs, are released into the extracellular fluid upon cellular activation and modulate cell degranulation [9, 1719]. This feature of sPLA2s explains their presence in biological fluids of patients with inflammatory diseases including asthma, autoimmune diseases, allergic diseases, and cancer [2025]. sPLA2s can exert their function through cleavage of membrane phospholipids or via receptors [2629]. Murakami et al. reported that the blocking of the heparin-binding domain of sPLA2 suppresses PLA2 group IIA-induced histamine release in murine mast cells [30]. The sPLA2s are essential for the release of AA from phospholipids and, thereby, for the production of eicosanoids that are produced in large quantities in patients with mastocytosis [3134].

PLC together with PLD are essential signals for MC activation and degranulation [10, 3537]. Hydrolysis of phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphospate by PLC, and of phosphatidylcholine by PLD followed by the action of phosphatidic acid hydrolase, is the major source of DAGs in stimulated MCs [14, 38, 39]. DAGs are physiological activators of PKC, and in the case of sn-2-arachidonoyl-DAG species, they are also precursors of the endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG) through the action of DAG lipases (DAGLs). Apart from acting on cannabinoid receptors, 2-AG can also be an alternative precursor of AA and eicosanoids [14, 40].

The ECs 2-AG and anandamide (AEA), together with non-EC AEA congeners, i.e., N-acylethanolamines like oleoylethanolamide (OEA) and palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), are biosynthesized “on demand” from membrane phospholipids and modulate the functional activities of a variety of cells including MCs [4143]. However, unlike 2-AG, N-acylethanolamines are produced from the action serine hydrolases different from PLs [44]. Yet, PEA possess the ability to reduce both acute and chronic inflammations by downmodulating activated MCs [16, 43, 4548]. MCs express cannabinoid receptors (CB) [49] that regulate MC activation [43]. Indeed, CB2 activation by 2-AG and AEA downregulates MC degranulation [50, 51].

Owing to the ability of PLs, DAGs, ECs, and N-acylethanolamines to modulate MC biology (either by directly activating MCs or by catalyzing the production/degradation of other molecules), we have analyzed the plasma concentration or activity of these lipid mediators in patients with mastocytosis.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Population

We studied 23 adult patients with mastocytosis (10 males and 13 females; age range: 29–76 years; median age 49 years) followed up at the University of Naples Federico II and at the University of Salerno. Table 1 summarizes the patients’ characteristics. None of the patients was on treatment for mastocytosis at the time of blood sampling. Twenty-three healthy individuals (10 males and 13 females; age range: 29–70 years; median age 43 years) were studied as the control group. Inclusion criteria were the absence of any known chronic or acute pathological condition at the time of enrollment, years, ingestion of any anti-inflammatory and immunomodulating drugs at the time of the blood sampling, and expression of written informed consent. Exclusion criteria were the presence of any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could interfere with the completion of the study procedures and pregnancy.

Table 1: Characteristics of 23 adult patients with mastocytosis.

Mediator-related symptoms were classified according to severity and frequency as follows: 6 patients had grade 0 (no symptoms), 7 had grade 1 (mild/infrequent: prophylaxis and/or as-needed therapy), 5 had grade 2 (moderate: kept under control with antimediator-type drugs daily), and 5 had grade 3 (severe and frequent: not sufficiently controlled with therapy). None of the patients had grade 4 characterized by a severe adverse event which requires immediate therapy and hospitalization [1].

The diagnosis and classification of mastocytosis were based according to the recommendation of the World Health Organization (WHO) on the histological examination of a skin biopsy for CM and of a bone marrow biopsy for SM [52]. Patients were divided according to cutaneous and/or systemic involvement and assessing the severity and frequency of symptoms. The first group (indolent) included maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis (MPCM) (), mastocytosis in the skin (MIS) (), bone marrow mastocytosis (BMM) (), and indolent SM (ISM) (). The second group (advanced) included patients with smouldering SM (SSM) (), aggressive SM (ASM) (), and SM associated with hematologic disease (SM-AHD) (). The most common mutation of KIT receptors found in patients with indolent and aggressive SM is KIT D816V [53]. The assessment of KIT D816V mutation was performed in all patients with ASM (3 patients), SSM (5 patients), and SM-AHD (1 patient). Among patients with indolent mastocytosis, the assessment of KIT mutation was performed in those with high levels of tryptase (>100 ng/mL). Patient no. 14 and patient no. 21 show the presence of activating KIT mutation. We invited patients with provisional diagnosis of mastocytosis in the skin (4 patients) to undergo a bone marrow biopsy, but they refused. Lipid mediators, such as PLA2, are often lipoprotein-bound or associated with the circulation; therefore, lipid profile (cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein, high-density lipoprotein, and triglycerides) was assessed in all patients and controls. Three patients had a low level of cholesterol (84, 89, and 73 mg/dL, respectively); the remaining patients and controls had normal lipid profile.

2.2. Plasma Collection

The Ethical Committee Campania ASL Napoli 3 Sud (protocol number 68863) approved that plasma obtained during routine diagnostics could be used for research investigating the physiopathology of mastocytosis, and written informed consent was obtained from patients according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki. The controls had been referred for routine medical check-up and volunteered for the study by giving informed consent. The samples were collected by means of a clean venipuncture and minimal stasis using sodium citrate 3.2%. In case of recent anaphylactic reactions, the measurement of all metabolites was performed at least two weeks after the acute event.

2.3. Tryptase

Plasma tryptase concentrations were measured by a fluoroenzyme immune assay (FEIA) using Uni-CAP100 (Phadia Diagnostics AB, Uppsala, Sweden). This technique allowed the measurement of both α-tryptase and β-tryptase. Normal values are 12.5 μg/L.

2.4. Phospholipase Activity Assay

A modified liposomal-based fluorescent assay was used to measure PLA2 activity in plasma (Life Technologies EnzChek® phospholipase A2 assay). Results are expressed as units/L of PLA2 activity.

PLC activity was determined using the EnzChek® Direct Phospholipase C Assay kit (Life Technologies). Results are expressed as units/L of PLC activity.

PLD activity was assessed using a Sigma-Aldrich kit (catalogue number MAK137). This assay evaluates the hydrolysis of phosphatidylcholine to choline by PLD. Results are expressed as units/L of PLD activity.

2.5. Measurement of Endocannabinoids (AEA, 2-AG), N-Acylethanolamines (PEA, OEA), and DAGs

Plasma was sonicated and extracted with chloroform/methanol/Tris-HCl 50 mmol/L pH 7.5 (2 : 1 : 1, vol/vol) containing internal standards ([H2]8 AEA 5 pmol; [H2]5 2-AG, [H2]5 PEA, and [H2]4 OEA 50 pmol each) for EC quantification as well as 1,2-heptadecanoin (Larodan AB, Malmo, Sweden) for DAG measurement. The lipid-containing organic phase was dried down, weighed, and prepurified by open-bed chromatography on silica gel with 99 : 1, 90 : 10, and 50 : 50 () chloroform/methanol. The 90 : 10 fraction was used for EC and N-acylethanolamine quantification by LC-APCI-MS (LCMS-2020, Shimadzu) as previously reported [54]. DAG levels were measured by LC-MS-MS using an LC20AB coupled to a hybrid detector IT-TOF (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) equipped with an ESI interface [55].

2.6. Statistical Analysis

Data were analyzed with the GraphPad Prism 5 software package. Data were tested for normality using the D’Agostino-Pearson normality test. If normality was not rejected at the 0.05 significance level, we used parametric tests. Otherwise, for not-normally distributed data, we used nonparametric tests. Statistical analysis was performed by an unpaired two-tailed -test or two-tailed Mann-Whitney test as indicated in figure legends. Correlations between two variables were assessed by Spearman’s correlation analysis and reported as coefficient of correlation (). A value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Plasma levels of PLA2, PLC, DAGs, and ECs are shown as the median (horizontal black line), the 25th and 75th percentiles (boxes), and the 5th and 95th percentiles (whiskers) of 23 controls and 23 patients.

3. Results

3.1. PLA2 and PLC, but Not PLD, Plasma Activities Are Increased in Patients with Mastocytosis

We measured plasma PLA2, PLC, and PLD activities in patients with mastocytosis () and age- and gender-matched healthy controls () (Figure 1). Both PLA2 (Figure 1(a)) and PLC (Figure 1(b)) activities were increased in patients with mastocytosis compared to controls. There was a positive linear correlation between PLA2 and PLC activities (Figure 1(c)). By contrast, no difference in activity of PLD was found between patients and controls (Figure 1(d)).

Figure 1: Activity of PLA2, PLC, and PLD in plasma of patients with mastocytosis and healthy controls. Data are shown as the median (horizontal black line), the 25th and 75th percentiles (boxes), and the 5th and 95th percentiles (whiskers) of 23 healthy controls and 23 mastocytosis patients for PLA2 (a), PLC (b), and PLD (d) assessment. Correlation between PLA2 and PLC (c) was assessed by Spearman’s correlation analysis and reported as coefficient of correlation (). PLA2 and PLC were measured in mastocytosis females and males (e, f) and healthy females and males (g, h).

There was no correlation between the age and the activity of PLA2 and PLC in both patients and controls (data not shown). PLA2 and PLC activities were higher in male mastocytosis patients (Figures 1(e) and 1(f)) whereas there was no gender difference in controls (Figures 1(g) and 1(h)).

PLA2, in particular group VII, are often lipoprotein-associated [22]. Only three of our patients had altered plasma cholesterol, but no correlation between lipid profile and PLA2 plasma activity was found in these patients (data not shown).

3.2. Increased DAG Concentrations in Patients with Mastocytosis

To evaluate whether the enhancement of PLC activity was accompanied by an increased production of DAGs, we measured DAG 18:1 20:4 and DAG 18:0 20:4 concentrations in the plasma of mastocytosis patients. Figure 2 shows that both DAG 18:1 20:4 (a) and DAG 18:0 20:4 (b) concentrations in the plasma of mastocytosis patients were higher than in healthy controls. DAG 18:1 20:4 and DAG 18:0 20:4 concentrations were positively correlated with each other (Supplementary Figure 1). Like PLC, DAG concentrations did not correlate with the age of our study populations (data not shown) but were higher in male patients (Figures 2(e) and 2(f)). In mastocytosis patients, the concentrations of DAGs did not correlate with PLC activities (Supplementary Figures 2A-2B), suggesting that alternative sources of DAGs, or reduced DAG catabolism (see below), may occur in these patients or that phospholipid precursor availability, rather than PLC activity, is the limiting step for DAG biosynthesis.

Figure 2: DAG 18:1 20:4 and 18:0 20:4 concentrations in plasma of patients with mastocytosis and healthy controls. DAG 18:1 20:4 (a) and DAG 18:0 20:4 (b) concentrations in healthy controls and mastocytosis patients. DAG 18:1 20:4 and DAG 18:0 20:4 concentrations in healthy females and males (c, d) and in mastocytosis females and males (e, f).
3.3. Endocannabinoids in Patients with Mastocytosis

Unlike the concentrations of its precursors (DAGs) (see above), 2-AG concentrations in patients with mastocytosis were similar to controls (Figure 3(a)), although they correlated positively with DAG concentrations (Figures 3(b) and 3(c)). Interestingly, AEA concentrations were lower in patients with mastocytosis compared to controls (Figure 3(d)). By contrast, PEA concentrations were increased in mastocytosis (Figure 3(e)). OEA concentrations did not differ between the two groups (Figure 3(f)).

Figure 3: 2-AG, AEA, PEA, and OEA concentrations in plasma of patients with mastocytosis and healthy controls. (a) 2-AG concentrations in healthy controls and mastocytosis patients. Correlation between 2-AG and DAG 18:1 20:4 (b) and DAG 18:0 20:4 (c) was assessed by Spearman’s correlation analysis and reported as coefficient of correlation (). AEA (d), PEA (e), and OEA (f) concentrations in healthy controls and mastocytosis patients. 2-AG concentration in healthy females and males (g) and in mastocytosis females and males (h).

No correlation was found between age and EC and N-acylethanolamine concentrations in either patients or healthy controls (data not shown). Males exhibited higher levels of 2-AG in both controls and patients compared to females (Figures 3(g) and 3(h)), whereas no gender differences were found in AEA and PEA concentrations (Supplementary Figures 3A-3F).

3.4. Relationships among PLA2, PLC, DAGs, and ECs and Disease Severity

To understand whether altered concentrations of PLs and their metabolites reflected different degrees of disease severity, we used a multiple experimental analysis. First, we analyzed the correlation among lipid metabolites and tryptase because a significant proportion of patients with advanced forms of mastocytosis (ASM and SM-AHD) exhibit markedly elevated serum tryptase levels (often >200 mg/L) compared to those with ISM [44, 56]. PLC (Figure 4(a)), but not PLA2 (Figure 4(b)) and DAGs (Figures 4(c) and 4(d)), positively correlated with tryptase concentrations in mastocytosis patients. The concentrations of AEA, which are lower in patients (Figure 3(d)), negatively correlated with tryptase concentrations (Figure 4(e)). By contrast, the concentrations of PEA (Figure 4(f)) did not correlate with tryptase.

Figure 4: Relationships among PLC, PLA2, DAG, ECs, and tryptase concentrations. Correlations between two variables (PLC and tryptase (a), PLA2 and tryptase (b), DAG 18:1 20:4 and tryptase (c), DAG 18:0 20:4 and tryptase (d), AEA and tryptase (e), and PEA and tryptase (f)) were assessed by Spearman’s correlation analysis and reported as coefficient of correlation (). value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Next, patients with mastocytosis were grouped according to the severity of mediator-related symptoms, and concentrations of PL, DAGs, AEA, and PEA levels were compared among groups. PLA2 and PLC activities were not increased in asymptomatic patients (grading 0) as compared to controls (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). Patients with mediator-related symptoms (grading 1 to 3) had elevated PLA2 and PLC activities compared to both asymptomatic patients and healthy controls (Figures 5(a) and 5(b)). By contrast, DAG concentrations were increased in all groups of mastocytosis patients compared to controls (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)). AEA were generally lower (Figure 5(e)), and PEA were increased in all mastocytosis patients compared to controls, respectively (Figure 5(f)).

Figure 5: Relationships among PLA2, PLC, DAG, AEA, and PEA and symptom grading. PLA2 (a), DAG 18:1 20:4 (b), DAG 18:0 20:4 (c), PLC (d), AEA (e), and PEA (f) were determined in six patients with symptom grading 0, seven patients with grading 1, five patients with grading 2, and five patients with grading 3. value < 0.05 and value < 0.01 vs. healthy controls. § value < 0.01 vs. patients with symptom grading 0.

Finally, we grouped patients according to their clinical variants in two groups (see Methods): indolent (MPCM/MIS/ISM/BMM) and advanced (SSM/SM-AHD/ASM) mastocytosis. Figure 6 shows that PLA2 activities (Figure 6(a)), DAGs (Figures 6(b) and 6(c)), AEA (Figure 6(d)), and PEA (Figure 6(e)) concentrations did not differ between patients with indolent and advanced variants but were altered in both indolent and advanced variants when compared to controls. PLC activity, like tryptase, was higher in patients with advanced mastocytosis compared to indolent variants (Figure 6(f)), but unlike tryptase, PLC activities were also increased in indolent mastocytosis compared to controls (Figure 6(g)).

Figure 6: Relationships among PLA2, DAG, AEA, PEA, and PLC and mastocytosis clinical variants. PLA2 (a), DAG 18:1 20:4 (b), DAG 18:0 20:4 (c), AEA (d), PEA (e), tryptase (f), and PLC (g) were determined in healthy controls and in 15 patients with indolent variants and 8 patients with advanced variants.

4. Discussion

In this study, we describe for the first time that plasma PL activities and concentrations of their metabolites (e.g., DAGs and 2-AG) are significantly altered in patients with mastocytosis. Patients with mastocytosis have (1) increased plasma activities of PLA2 and PLC, (2) elevated DAGs and PEA concentrations, and (3) decreased levels of AEA. It is well known that PLs control MC degranulation [9, 35] and eicosanoid production, two conditions associated with mastocytosis [3134]. Antagonists and/or inhibitors of synthesis of eicosanoids are currently used to treat mediator-related symptoms in patients with mastocytosis [57, 58]. These observations are in line with the results of our study showing that some of these molecules, in particular PLs, are significantly increased in patients with more severe symptoms and disease phenotype.

Mastocytosis is caused by an activating mutation of KIT that leads to uncontrolled proliferation and accumulation of MCs with heterogeneous clinical manifestations ranging from cutaneous and advanced forms with poor prognosis [3, 4]. Our results suggest that PLA2 and PLC could be involved in the development of mediator-related symptoms in patients with mastocytosis. In fact, PLA2 and PLC activities are increased in symptomatic but not in asymptomatic patients when compared to healthy controls. These data are consistent with the known effects of PLA2 and PLC on MCs. Indeed, some evidence demonstrates the role of PLA2 in MC activation through cPLA2 involvement. Kikawada and coworkers reported that in MCs lacking PLA2 group V, the time course of phosphorylation of ERK 1/2 and cPLA2 was markedly decreased, leading to attenuation of eicosanoid formation in response to stimulation through TLR2 but not through c-kit or FcεRI [59]. Phospholipase C- (PLC-) β3 is crucial for FcεRI-mediated MC activation [35]. MCs are a source and target of sPLA2, in particular, of group IIA (PLA2G2A) and groups V (PLA2G5) and III (PLA2G3) [9, 18]. Overexpression of PLA2G2A in rat MCs augments degranulation [9, 17] and triggers histamine [30] and PGD2 release [60], whereas overexpression of PLA2G3 leads to spontaneous skin inflammation [9, 61, 62].

Secretory phospholipases are increased in biological fluids of patients with several disease such as inflammatory, cardiovascular, and autoimmune diseases and cancer [23, 6367]. In this study, we have not assessed the specific PLA2 group(s) secreted in mastocytosis; however, it is reasonable to hypothesize that PLA2G2A, which is the major secreted form of PLA2 in human serum and plasma [23, 6367], is responsible for most of the detected PLA2 activity in mastocytosis. A time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (TR-FIA) on plasma and confocal microscopy analysis of tissue biopsies could identify the existence of types of PLA2 involved in mastocytosis.

Tryptase is the most widely used circulating marker of mastocytosis [68, 69] and is also an easy accessible predictor for disease progression in patients with indolent mastocytosis [56, 68]. Our results show that most patients with advanced forms of mastocytosis have markedly increased plasma PLC activities compared to those with indolent forms. In addition, PLC activities were positively correlated with tryptase concentrations. It will be interesting to evaluate whether the plasma levels of this enzyme at time of diagnosis could predict the clinical severity of mastocytosis.

Several PLC products such as DAG 18:1 20:4 and DAG 18:0 20:4 are increased in patients with mastocytosis, but their concentrations are similar in indolent and advanced variants. Interestingly, DAG concentrations are positively correlated with those of their metabolite 2-AG, even though 2-AG concentrations are not altered. Other sources of DAGs and/or alternative biosynthetic precursors for 2-AG, rather than shortage of DAGL activity, might explain this finding. It is conceivable that the increased DAG concentrations in mastocytosis reflect altered PKC activation, essential for release of preformed mediators in MC granules [36], rather than the production of 2-AG, which by activating CB2 cannabinoid receptors would instead counteract this effect [40].

In addition to previously discovered molecules aimed at controlling cellular (MC) activation, N-acylethanolamines (for example, AEA and its congener PEA) are involved in endogenous, cannabinoid receptor-dependent and independent, protective mechanisms that are activated as a result of different types of tissue damage or stimulation of inflammatory responses and nociceptive fibers [70]. We mentioned above the large body of evidence indicating that PEA has anti-inflammatory actions and inhibits MC degranulation [40]. Thus, the increase of PEA plasma levels in mastocytosis could represent an attempt to control the activation of MCs. By contrast, the decrease of AEA concentrations and its negative correlation with tryptase levels may contribute to the underlying inflammation associated with this disorder.

Human tryptase is considered highly specific of MCs, which may contain high amounts, up to 35 pg per cell [7173]. Although basophils may produce small quantities of tryptase, the vast majority of tryptase in the blood is derived by MCs [74, 75]. Detection of tryptase provides information about MC distribution, numbers, proliferation, and activation status [76] and is, therefore, a major marker of mast cell disorders, including mastocytosis [44, 56, 77, 78].

Unlike tryptase, PLs and the metabolites measured in this study are produced not only from MCs but also from other leukocytes such as neutrophils, eosinophils, and macrophages [9, 18, 41, 7981]. The biologic activity of PLs is not confined to MCs but includes other immune and nonimmune cells [41, 8284]. Our data show that both PLA2 and PLC are increased in plasma of patients with mastocytosis and that there is a correlation between PLC activity and serum tryptase but not between PLA2 and tryptase. These results indicate that these enzymes are secreted by cells that are activated in mastocytosis, but they do not allow to discriminate whether they are released from MCs or by other cells that could be indirectly activated in these patients. On the other hand, the cellular sources of PLs, DAGs, and PEA in the plasma of patients with mastocytosis are unknown, and further studies are needed to understand the origin of these enzymes in these patients.

It has been shown that the KIT activation generates PLC signal, DAG formation, and PKC activation [8587]. This study shows an increase of PLs in patients with more symptoms and with advanced form of mastocytosis. A question that remains to be answered is whether activating mutations of KIT lead to an abnormal PL activation that could contribute to the development of symptoms and to increase severity of mastocytosis. Future studies will compare the levels of PLs and their metabolites in patients with and without KIT mutation.

In conclusion, we demonstrate that plasma levels of PLs, DAGs, and some N-acylethanolamines are altered in patients with mastocytosis and that PLC activity is further increased in patients with symptomatic and aggressive forms of disease. These results suggest a relevant but different and, in some cases, opposing role of these mediators in mastocytosis. Further studies are needed to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of PLs, DAGs, and N-acylethanolamines in different forms of mastocytosis and to understand whether pharmacological blockade of these molecules (e.g., PKC) may improve the symptoms and severity of mastocytosis.

Abbreviations

AEA:Anandamide
AA:Arachidonic acid
ASM:Aggressive systemic mastocytosis
2-AG:2-Arachidonoylglycerol
BMM:Bone marrow mastocytosis
CM:Cutaneous mastocytosis
DAGs:Diacylglycerols
DAGLs:DAG lipases
ECs:Endocannabinoids
FEIA:Fluoroenzyme immune assay
ISM:Indolent systemic mastocytosis
MCs:Mast cells
MPCM:Maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis
MIS:Mastocytosis in the skin
PLs:Phospholipase enzymes
PEA:Palmitoylethanolamide
PGD2:Prostaglandin D2
PKC:Protein kinase C
OEA:Oleoylethanolamide
sPLA2s:Secreted PLA2
SSM:Smouldering systemic mastocytosis
SM:Systemic mastocytosis
SM-AHD:Systemic mastocytosis associated with ematologic disease
WHO:World Health Organization.

Data Availability

All data are fully available without restriction. All relevant data are within the paper and its supporting information files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

The authors who conducted experiments are Loffredo S., Ferrara A. L., Galdiero M. R., and Piscitelli F. Those who worked on clinical enrollment are Petraroli A., Triggiani M., Parente R., Marone G., and Varricchi G. And those who performed data analysis are Loffredo S., Ferrara A. L., Di Marzo V., Parente R., Marone G., and Piscitelli F. All authors participated in research design and wrote or contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank scientists from CISI Laboratory not listed as authors for invaluable collaborations and administrative staff (Dr. Roberto Bifulco and Dr. Anna Ferraro), without whom we could not function as an integrated team. This work was supported in part by grants from the Regione Campania CISI-Lab Project, CRèME Project, and TIMING Project.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table 1: the variants of systemic mastocytosis (SM). Supplementary Figure 1: the correlation between DAG 18:1 20:4 and DAG 18:0 20:4 in plasma of patients with mastocytosis. Supplementary Figure 2: the correlation between PLC and DAGs in plasma of patients with mastocytosis. Supplementary Figure 3: the relationship between AEA, PEA, and OEA concentrations and gender of patients with mastocytosis and healthy controls. (Supplementary Materials)

References

  1. P. Valent, C. Akin, L. Escribano et al., “Standards and standardization in mastocytosis: consensus statements on diagnostics, treatment recommendations and response criteria,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 435–453, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. D. D. Metcalfe and Y. A. Mekori, “Pathogenesis and pathology of mastocytosis,” Annual Review of Pathology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 487–514, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. P. Valent, C. Akin, K. Hartmann et al., “Advances in the classification and treatment of mastocytosis: current status and outlook toward the future,” Cancer Research, vol. 77, no. 6, pp. 1261–1270, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. P. Valent, C. Akin, and D. D. Metcalfe, “Mastocytosis: 2016 updated WHO classification and novel emerging treatment concepts,” Blood, vol. 129, no. 11, pp. 1420–1427, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. C. Akin, “Mast cell activation syndromes,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 349–355, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Schuch and K. Brockow, “Mastocytosis and anaphylaxis,” Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 153–164, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. D. D. Metcalfe, “Mast cells and mastocytosis,” Blood, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 946–956, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. C. Moon, A. D. Befus, and M. Kulka, “Mast cell mediators: their differential release and the secretory pathways involved,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. M. Murakami and Y. Taketomi, “Secreted phospholipase A2 and mast cells,” Allergology International, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 4–10, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. M. Zhu, J. Zou, T. Li et al., “Differential Roles of Phospholipase D Proteins in FcεRI-Mediated Signaling and Mast Cell Function,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 195, no. 9, pp. 4492–4502, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. L. Ramrakhiani and S. Chand, “Recent progress on phospholipases: different sources, assay methods, industrial potential and pathogenicity,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, vol. 164, no. 7, pp. 991–1022, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. Murakami, Y. Taketomi, Y. Miki, H. Sato, T. Hirabayashi, and K. Yamamoto, “Recent progress in phospholipase A2 research: From cells to animals to humans,” Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 152–192, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. A. B. Fisher and M. Jain, Phospholipases: Degradation of Phospholipids in Membranes and Emulsions, eLS, 2009.
  14. T. O. Eichmann and A. Lass, “DAG tales: the multiple faces of diacylglycerol--stereochemistry, metabolism, and signaling,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 72, no. 20, pp. 3931–3952, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. A. Boyce, “Mast cells and eicosanoid mediators: a system of reciprocal paracrine and autocrine regulation,” Immunological Reviews, vol. 217, no. 1, pp. 168–185, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Aloe, A. Leon, and R. Levi-Montalcini, “A proposed autacoid mechanism controlling mastocyte behaviour,” Agents and Actions, vol. 39, no. S1, pp. C145–C147, 1993. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. S. P. Chock, E. A. Schmauder-Chock, E. Cordella-Miele, L. Miele, and A. B. Mukherjee, “The localization of phospholipase A2 in the secretory granule,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 300, no. 3, pp. 619–622, 1994, Pt 3. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. Triggiani, G. Giannattasio, C. Calabrese et al., “Lung mast cells are a source of secreted phospholipases A2,” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 558–565.e3, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. F. Granata, V. Nardicchi, S. Loffredo et al., “Secreted phospholipases A(2): a proinflammatory connection between macrophages and mast cells in the human lung,” Immunobiology, vol. 214, no. 9-10, pp. 811–821, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. T. S. Hallstrand, Y. Lai, Z. Ni et al., “Relationship between levels of secreted phospholipase A2 groups IIA and X in the airways and asthma severity,” Clinical and Experimental Allergy, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 801–810, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. F. Granata, R. I. Staiano, S. Loffredo et al., “The role of mast cell-derived secreted phospholipases A2 in respiratory allergy,” Biochimie, vol. 92, no. 6, pp. 588–593, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. E. A. Dennis, J. Cao, Y. H. Hsu, V. Magrioti, and G. Kokotos, “Phospholipase A2 enzymes: physical structure, biological function, disease implication, chemical inhibition, and therapeutic intervention,” Chemical Reviews, vol. 111, no. 10, pp. 6130–6185, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. M. Menschikowski, A. Hagelgans, U. Schuler, S. Froeschke, A. Rosner, and G. Siegert, “Plasma levels of phospholipase A2-IIA in patients with different types of malignancies: prognosis and association with inflammatory and coagulation biomarkers,” Pathology Oncology Research, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 839–846, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. M. Murakami, K. Yamamoto, Y. Miki, R. Murase, H. Sato, and Y. Taketomi, “The roles of the secreted phospholipase A2 gene family in immunology,” Advances in Immunology, vol. 132, pp. 91–134, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. V. Brglez, G. Lambeau, and T. Petan, “Secreted phospholipases A2 in cancer: diverse mechanisms of action,” Biochimie, vol. 107, Part A, pp. 114–123, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. D. Bernard and D. Vindrieux, “PLA2R1: expression and function in cancer,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1846, no. 1, pp. 40–44, 2014. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. E. Boilard, S. G. Bourgoin, C. Bernatchez, P. E. Poubelle, and M. E. Surette, “Interaction of low molecular weight group IIA phospholipase A2 with apoptotic human T cells: role of heparan sulfate proteoglycans,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 1068–1080, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Fujita, K. Zhu, C. K. Fujita et al., “Proinflammatory Secreted Phospholipase A2 Type IIA (sPLA-IIA) Induces Integrin Activation through Direct Binding to a Newly Identified Binding Site (Site 2) in Integrins αvβ3, α4β1, and α5β1,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 290, no. 1, pp. 259–271, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. G. Lambeau and M. H. Gelb, “Biochemistry and physiology of mammalian secreted phospholipases A2,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 495–520, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. M. Murakami, N. Hara, I. Kudo, and K. Inoue, “Triggering of degranulation in mast cells by exogenous type II phospholipase A2,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 151, no. 10, pp. 5675–5684, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  31. J. D. Morrow, C. Guzzo, G. Lazarus, J. A. Oates, and L. Jackson Roberts II, “Improved diagnosis of mastocytosis by measurement of the major urinary metabolite of prostaglandin D2,” Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 104, no. 6, pp. 937–940, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. R. J. T. OUWENDIJK, F. J. ZIJLSTRA, J. H. P. WILSON, I. L. BONTA, J. E. VINCENT, and E. STOLZ, “Raised plasma levels of thromboxane B2in systemic mastocytosis,” European Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 227–229, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. J. D. Morrow, J. A. Oates, L. Jackson Roberts II et al., “Increased Formation of ThromboxaneIn Vivo in Humans with Mastocytosis,” The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 93–97, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. C. Akin and D. D. Metcalfe, “Surrogate markers of disease in mastocytosis,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 127, no. 2, pp. 133–136, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. W. Xiao, J.-i. Kashiwakura, H. Hong et al., “Phospholipase C-β3 Regulates FcɛRI-Mediated Mast Cell Activation by Recruiting the Protein Phosphatase SHP-1,” Immunity, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 893–904, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Z. Peng and M. A. Beaven, “An essential role for phospholipase D in the activation of protein kinase C and degranulation in mast cells,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 174, no. 9, pp. 5201–5208, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. A. Chahdi, W. S. Choi, Y. M. Kim, P. F. Fraundorfer, and M. A. Beaven, “Serine/threonine protein kinases synergistically regulate phospholipase D1 and 2 and secretion in RBL-2H3 mast cells,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 38, no. 16-18, pp. 1269–1276, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. P. Lin, W. J. Fung, and A. M. Gilfillan, “Phosphatidylcholine-specific phospholipase D-derived 1,2-diacylglycerol does not initiate protein kinase C activation in the RBL 2H3 mast-cell line,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 287, no. 1, pp. 325–331, 1992, Pt 1. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  39. D. A. Kennerly, “Phosphatidylcholine is a quantitatively more important source of increased 1,2-diacylglycerol than is phosphatidylinositol in mast cells,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 144, no. 10, pp. 3912–3919, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  40. M. Reisenberg, P. K. Singh, G. Williams, and P. Doherty, “The diacylglycerol lipases: structure, regulation and roles in and beyond endocannabinoid signalling,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, vol. 367, no. 1607, pp. 3264–3275, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  41. R. I. Staiano, S. Loffredo, F. Borriello et al., “Human lung-resident macrophages express CB1 and CB2 receptors whose activation inhibits the release of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic factors,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 99, no. 4, pp. 531–540, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. A. Luchicchi and M. Pistis, “Anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol: pharmacological properties, functional features, and emerging specificities of the two major endocannabinoids,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 374–392, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. L. Facci, R. Dal Toso, S. Romanello, A. Buriani, S. D. Skaper, and A. Leon, “Mast cells express a peripheral cannabinoid receptor with differential sensitivity to anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 92, no. 8, pp. 3376–3380, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. W. R. Sperr, J. H. Jordan, M. Fiegl et al., “Serum tryptase levels in patients with mastocytosis: correlation with mast cell burden and implication for defining the category of disease,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 136–141, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. D. Skaper, L. Facci, and P. Giusti, “Glia and mast cells as targets for palmitoylethanolamide, an anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective lipid mediator,” Molecular Neurobiology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 340–352, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. D. De Filippis, A. D’Amico, M. P. Cinelli, G. Esposito, V. Di Marzo, and T. Iuvone, “Adelmidrol, a palmitoylethanolamide analogue, reduces chronic inflammation in a carrageenin-granuloma model in rats,” Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1086–1095, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. F. Roviezzo, A. Rossi, E. Caiazzo et al., “Palmitoylethanolamide supplementation during sensitization prevents airway allergic symptoms in the mouse,” Frontiers in Pharmacology, vol. 8, p. 857, 2017. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. S. Cerrato, P. Brazis, M. F. della Valle, A. Miolo, and A. Puigdemont, “Effects of palmitoylethanolamide on immunologically induced histamine, PGD2 and TNFα release from canine skin mast cells,” Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. A. H. Y. Lau and S. S. M. Chow, “Effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on immunologically induced histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 464, no. 2-3, pp. 229–235, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. G. A. Cabral, G. A. Ferreira, and M. J. Jamerson, “Endocannabinoids and the immune system in health and disease,” Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology, vol. 231, pp. 185–211, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  51. S. L. Cruz, E. Sanchez-Miranda, J. I. Castillo-Arellano, R. D. Cervantes-Villagrana, A. Ibarra-Sanchez, and C. Gonzalez-Espinosa, “Anandamide inhibits FcεRI-dependent degranulation and cytokine synthesis in mast cells through CB2 and GPR55 receptor activation. Possible involvement of CB2-GPR55 heteromers,” International Immunopharmacology, vol. 64, pp. 298–307, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. A. Pardanani, “Systemic mastocytosis in adults: 2017 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and management,” American Journal of Hematology, vol. 91, no. 11, pp. 1146–1159, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. M. Arock, K. Sotlar, C. Akin et al., “KIT mutation analysis in mast cell neoplasms: recommendations of the European Competence Network on Mastocytosis,” Leukemia, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1223–1232, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. I. Matias, G. Carta, E. Murru, S. Petrosino, S. Banni, and V. Di Marzo, “Effect of polyunsaturated fatty acids on endocannabinoid and N-acyl-ethanolamine levels in mouse adipocytes,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1781, no. 1-2, pp. 52–60, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. F. Piscitelli, G. Carta, T. Bisogno et al., “Effect of dietary krill oil supplementation on the endocannabinoidome of metabolically relevant tissues from high-fat-fed mice,” Nutrition & Metabolism (London), vol. 8, no. 1, p. 51, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. K. H. Lim, A. Tefferi, T. L. Lasho et al., “Systemic mastocytosis in 342 consecutive adults: survival studies and prognostic factors,” Blood, vol. 113, no. 23, pp. 5727–5736, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  57. J. H. Butterfield, “Survey of aspirin administration in systemic mastocytosis,” Prostaglandins & Other Lipid Mediators, vol. 88, no. 3-4, pp. 122–124, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. A. Pardanani, “How I treat patients with indolent and smoldering mastocytosis (rare conditions but difficult to manage),” Blood, vol. 121, no. 16, pp. 3085–3094, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. E. Kikawada, J. V. Bonventre, and J. P. Arm, “Group V secretory PLA2 regulates TLR2-dependent eicosanoid generation in mouse mast cells through amplification of ERK and cPLA2alpha activation,” Blood, vol. 110, no. 2, pp. 561–567, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. M. Murakami, I. Kudo, and K. Inoue, “Eicosanoid generation from antigen-primed mast cells by extracellular mammalian 14-kDa group II phospholipase A2,” FEBS Letters, vol. 294, no. 3, pp. 247–251, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. H. Sato, Y. Taketomi, Y. Isogai et al., “Group III secreted phospholipase A2 transgenic mice spontaneously develop inflammation,” The Biochemical Journal, vol. 421, no. 1, pp. 17–27, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. Y. Taketomi, N. Ueno, T. Kojima et al., “Mast cell maturation is driven via a group III phospholipase A2-prostaglandin D2-DP1 receptor paracrine axis,” Nature Immunology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 554–563, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. J. O. Gronroos, J. H. Salonen, M. Viander, T. J. Nevalainen, and V. J. O. Laine, “Roles of group IIA phospholipase A2 and complement in killing of bacteria by acute phase serum,” Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 413–419, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. E. Kupert, M. Anderson, Y. Liu et al., “Plasma secretory phospholipase A2-IIa as a potential biomarker for lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules,” BMC Cancer, vol. 11, no. 1, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. Z. Mallat, G. Lambeau, and A. Tedgui, “Lipoprotein-Associated and Secreted Phospholipases A2 in Cardiovascular Disease,” Circulation, vol. 122, no. 21, pp. 2183–2200, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. T. J. Nevalainen, L. I. Eerola, E. Rintala, V. J. O. Laine, G. Lambeau, and M. H. Gelb, “Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassays of the complete set of secreted phospholipases A2 in human serum,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1733, no. 2-3, pp. 210–223, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. S. Loffredo, A. L. Ferrara, M. Bova et al., “Secreted phospholipases A2 in hereditary angioedema with C1-inhibitor deficiency,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, p. 1721, 2018. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. A. Matito, J. M. Morgado, I. Álvarez-Twose et al., “Serum tryptase monitoring in indolent systemic mastocytosis: association with disease features and patient outcome,” PLoS One, vol. 8, no. 10, article e76116, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. J. Hallgren and G. Pejler, “Biology of mast cell tryptase. An inflammatory mediator,” The FEBS Journal, vol. 273, no. 9, pp. 1871–1895, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. P. Pacher, S. Batkai, and G. Kunos, “The endocannabinoid system as an emerging target of pharmacotherapy,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 389–462, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. L. SCHWARTZ, “Tryptase, a mediator of human mast cells,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 594–598, 1990, Pt 2. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. J. Vitte, “Human mast cell tryptase in biology and medicine,” Molecular Immunology, vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 18–24, 2015. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. H. P. McNeil, R. Adachi, and R. L. Stevens, “Mast Cell-restricted Tryptases: Structure and Function in Inflammation and Pathogen Defense,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 282, no. 29, pp. 20785–20789, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. M. C. Castells, A. M. Irani, and L. B. Schwartz, “Evaluation of human peripheral blood leukocytes for mast cell tryptase,” The Journal of Immunology, vol. 138, no. 7, pp. 2184–2189, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  75. S. Jogie-Brahim, H. K. Min, Y. Fukuoka, H. Z. Xia, and L. B. Schwartz, “Expression of alpha-tryptase and beta-tryptase by human basophils,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 113, no. 6, pp. 1086–1092, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. P. Valent, “Mast cell activation syndromes: definition and classification,” Allergy, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 417–424, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  77. L. B. Schwartz, “Diagnostic value of tryptase in anaphylaxis and mastocytosis,” Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 451–463, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. P. Valent, H. P. Horny, M. Triggiani, and M. Arock, “Clinical and laboratory parameters of mast cell activation as basis for the formulation of diagnostic criteria,” International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, vol. 156, no. 2, pp. 119–127, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. N. Degousee, F. Ghomashchi, E. Stefanski et al., “Groups IV, V, and X phospholipases A2s in human neutrophils: role in eicosanoid production and gram-negative bacterial phospholipid hydrolysis,” The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 7, pp. 5061–5073, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. T. Kawakami and W. Xiao, “Phospholipase C-β in immune cells,” Advances in Biological Regulation, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 249–257, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. T. S. Hallstrand, Y. Lai, K. A. Hooper et al., “Endogenous secreted phospholipase A2 group X regulates cysteinyl leukotrienes synthesis by human eosinophils,” The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 137, no. 1, pp. 268–277.e8, 2016. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. F. Granata, A. Frattini, S. Loffredo et al., “Production of vascular endothelial growth factors from human lung macrophages induced by group IIA and group X secreted phospholipases A2,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 184, no. 9, pp. 5232–5241, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. M. Triggiani, F. Granata, A. Frattini, and G. Marone, “Activation of human inflammatory cells by secreted phospholipases A2,” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1761, no. 11, pp. 1289–1300, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. F. Chouinard, J. S. Lefebvre, P. Navarro et al., “The endocannabinoid 2-arachidonoyl-glycerol activates human neutrophils: critical role of Its hydrolysis and de novo leukotriene B4 biosynthesis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 186, no. 5, pp. 3188–3196, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. J. Liang, Y. L. Wu, B. J. Chen, W. Zhang, Y. Tanaka, and H. Sugiyama, “The C-kit receptor-mediated signal transduction and tumor-related diseases,” International Journal of Biological Sciences, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 435–443, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. K. Vosseller, G. Stella, N. S. Yee, and P. Besmer, “c-kit receptor signaling through its phosphatidylinositide-3'-kinase-binding site and protein kinase C: role in mast cell enhancement of degranulation, adhesion, and membrane ruffling,” Molecular Biology of the Cell, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 909–922, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. O. Kozawa, P. Blume-Jensen, C. H. Heldin, and L. Ronnstrand, “Involvement of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in stem-cell-factor-induced phospholipase D activation and arachidonic acid release,” European Journal of Biochemistry, vol. 248, no. 1, pp. 149–155, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus